Intravenous iron therapy in end-stage renal disease

Ferritin in Kidney and Vascular Related Diseases: Novel Roles for an Old Player

Iron is at the forefront of a number of pivotal biological processes due to its ability to readily accept and donate electrons. However, this property may also catalyze the generation of free radicals with ensuing cellular and tissue toxicity. Accordingly, throughout evolution numerous pathways and proteins have evolved to minimize the potential hazardous effects of iron cations and yet allow for readily available iron cations in a wide variety of fundamental metabolic processes. One of the extensively studied proteins in the context of systemic and cellular iron metabolisms is ferritin. While clinicians utilize serum ferritin to monitor body iron stores and inflammation, it is important to note that the vast majority of ferritin is located intracellularly. Intracellular ferritin is made of two different subunits (heavy and light chain) and plays an imperative role as a safe iron depot. In the past couple of decades our understanding of ferritin biology has remarkably improved. Additionally, a significant body of evidence has emerged describing the significance of the kidney in iron trafficking and homeostasis. Here, we briefly discuss some of the most important findings that relate to the role of iron and ferritin heavy chain in the context of kidney-related diseases and, in particular, vascular calcification, which is a frequent complication of chronic kidney disease.

Comparative Evaluation of U.S. Brand and Generic Intravenous Sodium Ferric Gluconate Complex in Sucrose Injection: Biodistribution after Intravenous Dosing in Rats

Relative biodistribution of FDA-approved innovator and generic sodium ferric gluconate (SFG) drug products was investigated to identify differences in tissue distribution of iron after intravenous dosing to rats. Three equal cohorts of 42 male Sprague-Dawley rats were created with each cohort receiving one of three treatments: (1) the innovator SFG product dosed intravenously at a concentration of 40 mg/kg; (2) the generic SFG product dosed intravenously at a concentration of 40 mg/kg; (3) saline dosed intravenously at equivalent volume to SFG products. Sampling time points were 15 min, 1 h, 8 h, 1 week, two weeks, four weeks, and six weeks post-treatment. Six rats from each group were sacrificed at each time point. Serum, femoral bone marrow, lungs, brain, heart, kidneys, liver, and spleen were harvested and evaluated for total iron concentration by ICP-MS. The ICP-MS analytical method was validated with linearity, range, accuracy, and precision. Results were determined for mean iron concentrations (µg/g) and mean total iron (whole tissue) content (µg/tissue) for each tissue of all groups at each time point. A percent of total distribution to each tissue was calculated for both products. At any given time point, the overall percent iron concentration distribution did not vary between the two SFG drugs by more than 7% in any tissue. Overall, this study demonstrated similar tissue biodistribution for the two SFG products in the examined tissues.

Safety of intravenous iron in hemodialysis patients

Among end-stage renal disease patients maintained by hemodialysis, anemia has been managed primarily through erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) and intravenous (IV) iron. Following concerns about the cardiovascular (CV) safety of ESAs and changes in the reimbursement policies in Medicare's ESRD program, the use of IV iron has increased. IV iron supplementation promotes hemoglobin production and reduces ESA requirements, yet there exists relatively little evidence on the long-term safety of iron supplementation in hemodialysis patients. Labile iron can induce oxidative stress and is also essential in bacterial growth, leading to concerns about IV iron use and risk of CV events and infections in hemodialysis patients. Existing randomized controlled trials provide little evidence about safety due to insufficient power and short follow-up; recent observational studies have been inconsistent, but some have associated iron exposure with increased risk of infections and CV events. Given the widespread use and potential safety concerns related to IV iron, well-designed large prospective studies are needed to assess to identify optimal strategies for iron administration that maximize its benefits while avoiding potential risks.

Comparative Short-term Safety of Sodium Ferric Gluconate Versus Iron Sucrose in Hemodialysis Patients

BACKGROUND

Despite different pharmacologic properties, little is known about the comparative safety of sodium ferric gluconate versus iron sucrose in hemodialysis patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study using the clinical database of a large dialysis provider (2004-2005) merged with administrative data from the US Renal Data System.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

66,207 patients with Medicare coverage who received center-based hemodialysis.

PREDICTORS

Iron formulation use assessed during repeated 1-month exposure periods (n=278,357).

OUTCOMES

All-cause mortality, infection-related hospitalizations and mortality, and cardiovascular-related hospitalizations and mortality occurring during a 3-month follow-up period.

MEASUREMENTS

For all outcomes, we estimated 90-day risk differences between the formulations using propensity score weighting of Kaplan-Meier functions, which controlled for a wide range of demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables. Risk differences were also estimated within various clinically important subgroups.

RESULTS

Ferric gluconate was administered in 11.4%; iron sucrose, in 48.9%; and no iron in 39.7% of the periods. Risks for most study outcomes did not differ between ferric gluconate and iron sucrose; however, among patients with a hemodialysis catheter, use of ferric gluconate was associated with a slightly decreased risk for both infection-related death (risk difference, -0.3%; 95% CI, -0.5% to 0.0%) and infection-related hospitalization (risk difference, -1.5%; 95% CI, -2.3% to -0.6%). Bolus dosing was associated with an increase in infection-related events among both ferric gluconate and iron sucrose users.

LIMITATIONS

Residual confounding and outcome measurement error.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the 2 iron formulations studied exhibited similar safety profiles; however, ferric gluconate was associated with a slightly decreased risk for infection-related outcomes compared to iron sucrose among patients with a hemodialysis catheter. These associations should be explored further using other data or study designs.

Acceleration of iron utilization after intravenous iron administration during activated erythropoiesis in hemodialysis patients: a randomized study

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different timings of iron administration during erythropoiesis activated by continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (CERA) on reticulocyte iron uptake in hemodialysis patients. In total, 110 patients were randomized to receive 40 mg intravenous elemental iron doses at all three hemodialysis sessions in the first week (IW1 group: n = 57) or in the third week (IW3 group: n = 53) after CERA administration. Following CERA administration at day 0, reticulocyte count increased, peaking at day 7. At days 7 and 14, the observed changes in Ret-He were higher in the IW1 group than in the IW3 group. Increases in total reticulocyte hemoglobin at day 7 were higher in the IW1 group than in the IW3 group. In contrast, there was only tendency toward greater total reticulocyte hemoglobin after iron administration in the third week in the IW3 group. Intravenous iron supplementation in the first week of CERA administration increases reticulocyte iron uptake; however, iron supplementation in the third week does not. The findings indicate that iron should be intravenously administered to increase the efficacy of CERA within 1 week of CERA administration during highly active erythropoiesis.

Comparative short-term safety of bolus versus maintenance iron dosing in hemodialysis patients: a replication study

Background

Recent research has reported that patients receiving bolus (frequent large doses to achieve iron repletion) versus maintenance dosing of iron have an increased short-term risk of infection, but a similar risk of cardiovascular events. We sought to determine whether these findings could be replicated using the same methods and a different data source.

Methods

Clinical data from 6,605 patients of a small U.S. dialysis provider merged with Medicare claims data were examined. Iron dosing patterns (bolus, maintenance, no iron) were identified during 1-month exposure periods and cardiovascular and infection-related outcomes were assessed during 3-month follow-up periods. The effects of bolus versus maintenance dosing were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression analyses to estimate hazard ratios and semiparametric additive risk models to estimate hazard rate differences, controlling for demographic and clinical characteristics, laboratory values and medications, and comorbidities.

Results

48,050 exposure/follow-up periods were examined. 13.9 percent of the exposure periods were bolus dosing, 49.3 percent were maintenance dosing, and the remainder were no iron use. All of the adjusted hazard ratios were >1.00 for the infection-related outcomes, suggesting that bolus dosing increases the risk of these events. The effects were greatest for hospitalized for infection of any major organ system (hazard ratio 1.13 (1.03, 1.24)) and use of intravenous antibiotics (hazard ratio 1.08 (1.02, 1.15). When examining the subgroup of individuals with catheters, the hazard ratios for the infection-related outcomes were generally greater than in the overall sample. There was little association between type of dosing practice and cardiovascular outcomes.

Conclusions

Results of this study provide further evidence of the association between bolus dosing and increased infection risk, particularly in the subgroup of patients with a catheter, and of the lack of an association between dosing practices and cardiovascular outcomes.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2369-15-154) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Variation in intravenous iron use internationally and over time: the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS)

BACKGROUND

To examine patterns of intravenous (IV) iron use across 12 countries from 1999 to 2011.

METHODS

Trends in iron use are described among 32 192 hemodialysis (HD) patients in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study. Adjusted associations of IV iron dose with serum ferritin and transferrin saturation (TSAT) values were also studied.

RESULTS

IV iron was administered to 50% of patients over 4 months in 1999, increasing to 71% during 2009-11, with increasing use in most countries. Among patients receiving IV iron, the mean monthly dose increased from 232 ± 167 to 281 ± 211 mg. Most countries used 3 to 4 doses/month, but Canada used about 2 doses/month, Italy increased from 3 to almost 6 doses/month and Germany used 5 to 6 doses/month. The USA and most European countries predominantly used iron sucrose and sodium ferric gluconate. A significant use of iron dextran was limited to Canada and France; iron polymaltose was used in Australia and New Zealand; and Japan used ferric oxide saccharate, chondroitin polysulfate iron complex and cideferron. Ferritin values rose in most countries: 22% of patients had ≥ 800 ng/mL in the recent years of study. TSAT levels increased to a lesser degree over time. Japan had much lower IV iron dosing and ferritin levels, but similar TSAT levels. In adjusted analyses, serum ferritin and TSAT levels increased signifcantly by 14 ng/mL and 0.16%, respectively, for every 100 mg/month higher mean monthly iron dose.

CONCLUSIONS

IV iron prescription patterns varied between countries and changed over time from 1999 to 2011. IV iron use and dose increased in most countries, with notable increases in ferritin but not TSAT levels. With rising cumulative IV iron doses, studies of the effects of changing IV iron dosing and other anemia management practices on clinical outcomes should be a high priority.

Pretransplantation erythropoiesis-stimulating agent hyporesponsiveness is associated with increased kidney allograft failure and mortality

BACKGROUND

Poor response to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) is associated with morbidity and mortality among dialysis patients. It is unclear whether the risk associated with poor ESA response during dialysis extends beyond kidney transplantation. We examined pretransplantation ESA response and its effect on allograft failure and mortality.

METHODS

The cohort included all adult Medicare recipients from the U.S. Renal Data System who had received a kidney transplant during years 2000 to 2007 and had at least 6 months of hemodialysis immediately before transplantation. ESA hyporesponsiveness was primarily defined as a monthly ESA dose of 75,000 units or higher and hematocrit 33% or less for at least 3 consecutive months in the pretransplantation period. Crude and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate the effect of ESA hyporesponsiveness on allograft failure and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

The study group consisted of 36,450 patients; 1004 exhibited hyporesponsiveness. The adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for allograft failure and mortality after transplantation were 1.23 (1.10-1.42) and 1.61 (1.43-1.81), respectively, supporting that poor ESA response during hemodialysis is associated with adverse posttransplantation outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

ESA hyporesponsiveness may be useful in identifying potential allograft recipients who are at high risk for subsequent morbidity and mortality and may benefit from more intensive pretransplantation and posttransplantation monitoring.

Iron and infection in hemodialysis patients

Intravenous iron is an important component of the treatment of anemia of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), but it is biologically plausible that iron could increase the risk of infection through impairment of neutrophil and T-cell function and promotion of microbial growth. Any such increase in risk would be particularly important because infection is a significant cause of mortality and morbidity in dialysis patients. The overall evidence favors an association between iron and infection in hemodialysis patients, but the optimal iron management strategy to minimize infection risk has yet to be identified. There is a need for further research on this topic, particularly in light of increased utilization of intravenous iron following implementation of the bundled ESRD reimbursement system.

Intravenous iron supplementation practices and short-term risk of cardiovascular events in hemodialysis patients

Background & Objectives

Intravenous iron supplementation is widespread in the hemodialysis population, but there is uncertainty about the safest dosing strategy. We compared the safety of different intravenous iron dosing practices on the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in a large population of hemodialysis patients.

Design settings, participants, & measurements

A retrospective cohort was created from the clinical database of a large dialysis provider (years 2004-2008) merged with administrative data from the United States Renal Data System. Dosing comparisons were (1) bolus (consecutive doses ≥ 100 mg exceeding 600 mg during one month) versus maintenance (all other iron doses during the month); and (2) high (> 200 mg over 1 month) versus low dose (≤ 200 mg over 1 month). We established a 6-month baseline period (to identify potential confounders and effect modifiers), a one-month iron exposure period, and a three-month follow-up period. Outcomes were myocardial infarction, stroke, and death from cardiovascular disease.

Results

117,050 patients contributed 776,203 unique iron exposure/follow-up periods. After adjustment, we found no significant associations of bolus dose versus maintenance, hazards ratio for composite outcome, 1.03 (95% C.I. 0.99, 1.07), or high dose versus low dose intravenous iron, hazards ratio for composite outcome, 0.99 (95% C.I. 0.96, 1.03). There were no consistent associations of either high or bolus dose versus low or maintenance respectively among pre-specified subgroups.

Conclusions

Strategies favoring large doses of intravenous iron were not associated with increased short-term cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Investigation of the long-term safety of the various intravenous iron supplementation strategies may still be warranted.

Approaches to inverse-probability-of-treatment--weighted estimation with concurrent treatments

OBJECTIVES

In a setting with two concurrent treatments, inverse-probability-of-treatment weights can be used to estimate the joint treatment effects or the marginal effect of one treatment while taking the other to be a confounder. We explore these two approaches in a study of intravenous iron use in hemodialysis patients treated concurrently with epoetin alfa (EPO).

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

We linked US Renal Data System data with electronic health records (2004-2008) from a large dialysis provider. Using a retrospective cohort design with 776,203 records from 117,050 regular hemodialysis patients, we examined a composite outcome: mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke.

RESULTS

With EPO as a joint treatment, inverse-probability-of-treatment weights were unstable, confidence intervals for treatment effects were wide, covariate balance was unsatisfactory, and the treatment and outcome models were sensitive to omission of the baseline EPO covariate. By handling EPO exposure as a confounder instead of a joint treatment, we derived stable weights and balanced treatment groups on measured covariates.

CONCLUSIONS

In settings with concurrent treatments, if only one treatment is of interest, then including the other in the treatment model as a confounder may result in more stable treatment effect estimates. Otherwise, extreme weights may necessitate additional analysis steps.

Infection risk with bolus versus maintenance iron supplementation in hemodialysis patients

Intravenous iron may promote bacterial growth and impair host defense, but the risk of infection associated with iron supplementation is not well defined. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of hemodialysis patients to compare the safety of bolus dosing, which provides a large amount of iron over a short period of time on an as-needed basis, with maintenance dosing, which provides smaller amounts of iron on a regular schedule to maintain iron repletion. Using clinical data from 117,050 patients of a large US dialysis provider merged with data from Medicare's ESRD program, we estimated the effects of iron dosing patterns during repeated 1-month exposure periods on risks of mortality and infection-related hospitalizations during the subsequent 3 months. Of 776,203 exposure/follow-up pairs, 13% involved bolus dosing, 49% involved maintenance dosing, and 38% did not include exposure to iron. Multivariable additive risk models found that patients receiving bolus versus maintenance iron were at increased risk of infection-related hospitalization (risk difference [RD], 25 additional events/1000 patient-years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 16 to 33) during follow-up. Risks were largest among patients with a catheter (RD, 73 events/1000 patient-years; 95% CI, 48 to 99) and a recent infection (RD, 57 events/1000 patient-years; 95% CI, 19 to 99). We also observed an association between bolus dosing and infection-related mortality. Compared with no iron, maintenance dosing did not associate with increased risks for adverse outcomes. These results suggest that maintenance iron supplementation may result in fewer infections than bolus dosing, particularly among patients with a catheter.

Changing patterns of anemia management in US hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and adjuvant intravenous iron have been the primary treatment for anemia in chronic kidney disease. Recent clinical and policy-related events have challenged this traditional paradigm, particularly in regard to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. Less is known about the impact of these events on intravenous iron use.

METHODS

United States Renal Data System data (2002-2008) on Medicare hemodialysis patients were examined. For each patient, monthly intravenous iron dose, erythropoiesis-stimulating agent dose, and hemoglobin values were determined. Data were summarized by calendar quarter and plotted for the entire sample and by demographic, clinical, and facility-level subgroups. Marginal means for these variables also were computed to account for changes in patient characteristics over time.

RESULTS

Quarterly iron use increased from 64% in 2002 to 76% in 2008. Mean quarterly iron dose increased from 500 mg in 2002 to 650 mg in 2008. Mean monthly erythropoiesis-stimulating agent dose (per quarter) increased from 2002 to 2006 and then declined. Mean hemoglobin values followed a pattern similar to erythropoiesis-stimulating agent dose. The same patterns in iron, erythropoiesis-stimulating agent dose, and hemoglobin were generally observed across demographic, clinical, facility, and geographic subgroups, with some important differences between subgroups, specifically race and dialysis vintage.

CONCLUSIONS

Anemia management patterns have changed markedly between 2002 and 2008, with a steady increase in intravenous iron use even after declines in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent dose and hemoglobin. The clinical impacts of these changes need further evaluation.

Iron and vascular calcification. Is there a link?

Iron deficiency is frequently seen in patients with end-stage renal disease, particularly in those treated by dialysis, this is because of an impairment in gastrointestinal absorption and ongoing blood losses or alternatively, due to an impaired capacity to mobilize iron from its stores, called functional iron deficiency. Therefore, these patients may require intravenous iron to sustain adequate treatment with erythropoietin-stimulating agents. Aside from this, they are also prone to vascular calcification, which has been reported a major contributing factor in the development of cardiovascular disease and the increased mortality associated herewith. Several factors and mechanisms underlying the development of vascular calcification in chronic kidney diseased patients have been put forward during recent years. In view of the ability of iron to exert direct toxic effects and to induce oxidative stress on the one hand versus its essential role in various cellular processes on the other hand, the possible role of iron in the development of vascular calcification should be considered.

It's time to compare anemia management strategies in hemodialysis

Randomized trials of intravenous (IV) iron have repeatedly demonstrated a rise in hemoglobin (Hgb), an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) dose-sparing effect, and apparent safety. Such benefits were confirmed in a trial in hemodialysis patients with high ferritin receiving high ESA doses. But long-term randomized safety trials of IV iron have not been performed, which critics blame on IV iron manufacturers, leading some to question widespread use of IV iron to optimize Hgb and reduce ESA dose. ESAs increase risks of cardiovascular events and death when used to target higher versus lower Hgb values. Association studies report increasing risk with higher ESA doses at approved Hgb targets. Nevertheless, ESAs remain essential in dialysis practice. After early termination of the Normal Hematocrit Trial in 1996, analysis suggested IV iron was a risk factor for harm. In 2006, dangers related to ESA use were recognized. Trial results demonstrating IV iron was efficacious and ESA-sparing even at higher serum ferritin have intensified the focus on iron safety. Two principal alternatives in the management of anemia among dialysis patients are: (1) more intensive ESA dosing sparing iron dosing and (2) more intensive iron dosing sparing ESA dosing. Extended safety trials of IV iron versus no iron will become confounded by ESA dose differences between arms. Similarly higher ESA doses are associated with increased mortality risk, but trials comparing ESA doses will be confounded by Hgb differences. Rather than focus on individual products, we should perform trials comparing anemia management strategies to assess safety, efficacy, and cost.

Anemia in renal disease: diagnosis and management

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a widespread health problem in the world and anemia is a common complication. Anemia conveys significant risk for cardiovascular disease, faster progression of renal failure and decreased quality of life. Patients with CKD can have anemia for many reasons, including but not invariably their renal insufficiency. These patients require a thorough evaluation to identify and correct causes of anemia other than erythropoietin deficiency. The mainstay of treatment of anemia secondary to CKD has become erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). The use of ESAs does carry risks and these agents need to be used judiciously. Iron deficiency often co-exists in this population and must be evaluated and treated. Correction of iron deficiency can improve anemia and reduce ESA requirements. Partial, but not complete, correction of anemia is associated with improved outcomes in patients with CKD.

Use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients with anemia of chronic kidney disease: overcoming the pharmacological and pharmacoeconomic limitations of existing therapies

Stage 3 chronic kidney disease (CKD), which is characterized by a glomerular filtration rate of 30 to 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (reference range, 90-200 mL/min/1.73m2 for a 20-year-old, with a decrease of 4 mL/min per decade), affects approximately 8 million people in the United States. Anemia is common in patients with stage 3 CKD and, if not corrected, contributes to a poor quality of life. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), introduced almost 2 decades ago, have replaced transfusions as first-line therapy for anemia. This review summarizes the current understanding of the role of ESAs in the primary care of patients with anemia of CKD and discusses pharmacological and pharmacoeconomic issues raised by recent data. Relevant studies in the English language were identified by searching the MEDLINE database (1987-2006). Two ESAs are currently available in the United States, epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa. More frequent dosing with epoetin alfa is recommended by the labeled administration guidelines because it has a shorter half-life than darbepoetin alfa. Clinical experience also supports extended dosing intervals for both these ESAs. Use of ESAs in the management of anemia of CKD is associated with improved quality of life, increased survival, and decreased progression of renal failure. Some evidence suggests that ESAs have a cardioprotective effect. However, correction of anemia to hemoglobin levels greater than 12 g/dL (to convert to g/L, multiply by 10) appears to increase the risk of adverse cardiac outcomes and progression of kidney disease in some patients. The prescription of ESAs in the primary care setting requires an understanding of the accepted use of these agents, the associated pharmacoeconomic challenges, and the potential risks. This review considers the need to balance effective ESA dosing intervals against the potential risks of treatment.