Dialytic therapies to prevent NSF following gadolinium exposure in high-risk patients

Effective removal of gadolinium with hemodialysis in a dog with severe acute on chronic kidney injury

OBJECTIVE

To describe the use of intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) to remove gadolinium (28.1 mg/kg dose) in a dog with severe kidney disease.

CASE SUMMARY

A 12-year-old neutered female Yorkshire Terrier presented with severe acute-on-chronic kidney injury and concurrent neurological signs. The dog received extracorporeal therapy as part of management. Uremia improved after hemodialysis, but central nervous system signs persisted; therefore, a contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging was performed, immediately followed by IHD. Two IHD treatments with a low-flux dialyzer were performed 1.5 and 25.75 hours after administration of gadolinium, with almost complete removal of gadolinium. More than 96% of gadolinium was removed with a single treatment.

NEW OR UNIQUE INFORMATION PROVIDED

Extracorporeal therapy is effective at removing gadolinium-based chelated contrast agents and could be considered if magnetic resonance imaging is indicated in a patient with substantial kidney impairment. Alternatively, newer contrast agents that have been deemed safer in this patient population could be used.

Gadolinium: pharmacokinetics and toxicity in humans and laboratory animals following contrast agent administration

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) have transformed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by facilitating the use of contrast-enhanced MRI to allow vital clinical diagnosis in a plethora of disease that would otherwise remain undetected. Although over 500 million doses have been administered worldwide, scientific research has documented the retention of gadolinium in tissues, long after exposure, and the discovery of a GBCA-associated disease termed nephrogenic systemic fibrosis, found in patients with impaired renal function. An understanding of the pharmacokinetics in humans and animals alike are pivotal to the understanding of the distribution and excretion of gadolinium and GBCAs, and ultimately their potential retention. This has been well studied in humans and more so in animals, and recently there has been a particular focus on potential toxicities associated with multiple GBCA administration. The purpose of this review is to highlight what is currently known in the literature regarding the pharmacokinetics of gadolinium in humans and animals, and any toxicity associated with GBCA use.

[Contrast media use in kidney disease - clinical practice recommendations]

Contrast media use in patients with renal disease regularly ensures discussions in everyday clinical practice. Both X-ray and MRI contrast media are predominantly eliminated by the kidneys and therefore closely linked to kidney function. Risk stratification prior to contrast media use in patients with pre-existing renal dysfunction should be based on eGFR-determination. Patients with an eGFR ≥ 30 ml/min require an individual risk assessment. In patients with advanced renal insufficiency ensuring euvolemia is crucial. Currently, there is no evidence for any other preventive approach. Therefore, no further specific procedures preventing contrast-associated kidney injury are recommended. Timing of contrast media injection and dialysis sessions in patients with end stage renal disease is necessary only after MRI contrast media use. Independently, acute kidney injury requires a patient individual decision.

2021 Update on Safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Joint Statement From Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often considered the gold-standard test for characterizing cardiac as well as noncardiac structure and function. However, many patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and/or severe renal dysfunction are unable to undergo this test because of safety concerns. In the past 10 years, newer-generation CIEDs and gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) as well as coordinated care between imaging and heart rhythm device teams have mitigated risk to patients and improved access to MRI at many hospitals. The purpose of this statement is to review published data on safety of MRI in patients with conditional and nonconditional CIEDs in addition to patient risks from older and newer GBCAs. This statement was developed through multidisciplinary collaboration of pan-Canadian experts after a relevant and independent literature search by the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. All recommendations align with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Key recommendations include: (1) the development of standardized protocols for patients with a CIED undergoing MRI; (2) patients with MRI nonconditional pacemakers and pacemaker dependency should be programmed to asynchronous mode and those with MRI nonconditional transvenous defibrillators should have tachycardia therapies turned off during the scan; and (3) macrocyclic or newer linear GBCAs should be used in preference to older GBCAs because of their better safety profile in patients at higher risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis.

Risks and Options With Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents in Patients With CKD: A Review

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) improve the diagnostic capabilities of magnetic resonance imaging. Although initially believed to be without major adverse effects, GBCA use in patients with severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) was demonstrated to cause nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF). Restrictive policies of GBCA use in CKD and selective use of GBCAs that bind free gadolinium more strongly have resulted in the virtual elimination of NSF cases. Contemporary studies of the use of GBCAs with high binding affinity for free gadolinium in severe CKD demonstrate an absence of NSF. Despite these observations and the limitations of contemporary studies, physicians remain concerned about GBCA use in severe CKD. Concerns of GBCA use in severe CKD are magnified by recent observations demonstrating gadolinium deposition in brain and a possible systemic syndrome attributed to GBCAs. Radiologic advances have resulted in several new imaging modalities that can be used in the severe CKD population and that do not require GBCA administration. In this article, we critically review GBCA use in patients with severe CKD and provide recommendations regarding GBCA use in this population.

Cardiovascular disease in patients with chronic kidney disease

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at increased risk for kidney failure, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and death. In fact, the likelihood of dying from CVD is markedly higher than that for reaching end-stage renal disease. Evidence-based management of comorbidities such as CVD remains challenging in patients with advanced CKD, as they were usually excluded from randomized controlled trials. This review focuses on the epidemiology, risk factors, and clinical manifestations of CVD in patients with advanced CKD. Specific topics of interest include diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of heart failure, coronary artery disease, and atrial fibrillation.

Updated Clinical Practice Guideline on Use of Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents in Kidney Disease Issued by the Canadian Association of Radiologists

In 2017, the Canadian Association of Radiologists issued a clinical practice guideline (CPG) regarding the use of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) in patients with acute kidney injury (AKI), chronic kidney disease (CKD), or on dialysis due to mounting evidence indicating that nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) occurs with extreme rarity or not at all when using Group II GBCAs or the Group III GBCA gadoxetic acid (compared to first generation Group I linear GBCAs). One of the goals of the work group was to re-evaluate the CPG after 24 months to determine the effect of more liberal use of GBCA on reported cases of NSF in patients with AKI, CKD Stage 4 or 5 (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2), or those that are dialysis-dependent. A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted by a subcommittee of the initial CPG panel between the dates of January 1, 2017-December 31, 2018 to identify new unconfounded cases of NSF linked to Group II or Group III GBCAs and an updated CPG developed. To our knowledge, when using a Group II or Group III GBCA between 2017-2018, only a single unconfounded case report of a fibrosing dermopathy has been reported in a patient who received gadobenate dimeglumine with Stage 2 CKD. No other unconfounded cases of NSF have been reported with Group II or III agents in during this timeframe. The subcommittee concluded that the main recommendations from the 2017 CPG should remain unaltered, but agreed that screening for renal disease in the outpatient setting is no longer justifiable, cost-effective or recommended. Patients on hemodialysis (HD) should, however, be identified prior to GBCA administration to arrange timely HD to optimize gadolinium clearance, although there remains no evidence that HD reduces the risk of NSF. When administering Group II or III GBCAs to patients with AKI, on dialysis or with severe CKD, informed consent relating to NSF is also no longer explicitly recommended.

Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents in Kidney Disease: A Comprehensive Review and Clinical Practice Guideline Issued by the Canadian Association of Radiologists

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Use of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA) in renal impairment is controversial, with physician and patient apprehension in acute kidney injury (AKI), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and dialysis because of concerns regarding nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF). The position that GBCA are absolutely contraindicated in AKI, category G4 and G5 CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2), and dialysis-dependent patients is outdated and may limit access to clinically necessary contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations. This review and clinical practice guideline addresses the discrepancy between existing Canadian guidelines regarding use of GBCA in renal impairment and NSF.

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

Published literature (including clinical trials, retrospective cohort series, review articles, and case reports), online registries, and direct manufacturer databases were searched for reported cases of NSF by class and specific GBCA and exposed patient population.

METHODS

A comprehensive review was conducted identifying cases of NSF and their association to class of GBCA, specific GBCA used, patient, and dose (when this information was available). Based on the available literature, consensus guidelines were developed by an expert panel of radiologists and nephrologists.

KEY FINDINGS

In patients with category G2 or G3 CKD (eGFR ≥ 30 and < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2), administration of standard doses of GBCA is safe and no additional precautions are necessary. In patients with AKI, with category G4 or G5 CKD (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) or on dialysis, administration of GBCA should be considered individually and alternative imaging modalities utilized whenever possible. If GBCA are necessary, newer GBCA may be administered with patient consent obtained by a physician (or their delegate) citing an exceedingly low risk (much less than 1%) of developing NSF. Standard GBCA dosing should be used; half or quarter dosing is not recommended and repeat injections should be avoided. Dialysis-dependent patients should receive dialysis; however, initiating dialysis or switching from peritoneal to hemodialysis to reduce the risk of NSF is unproven. Use of a macrocyclic ionic instead of macrocyclic nonionic GBCA or macrocyclic instead of newer linear GBCA to further prevent NSF is unproven. Gadopentetate dimeglumine, gadodiamide, and gadoversetamide remain absolutely contraindicated in patients with AKI, those with category G4 or G5 CKD, or those on dialysis. The panel agreed that screening for renal disease is important but less critical when using macrocyclic and newer linear GBCA. Monitoring for and reporting of potential cases of NSF in patients with AKI or CKD who have received GBCA is recommended.

LIMITATIONS

Limited available literature (number of injections and use in renal impairment) regarding the use of gadoxetate disodium. Limited, but growing and generally high-quality, number of clinical trials evaluating GBCA administration in renal impairment. Limited data regarding the topic of Gadolinium deposition in the brain, particularly as it related to patients with renal impairment.

IMPLICATIONS

In patients with AKI and category G4 and G5 CKD (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) and in dialysis-dependent patients who require GBCA-enhanced MRI, GBCA can be administered with exceedingly low risk of causing NSF when using macrocyclic agents and newer linear agents at routine doses.

Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents in Kidney Disease: Comprehensive Review and Clinical Practice Guideline Issued by the Canadian Association of Radiologists

Use of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) in renal impairment is controversial, with physician and patient apprehension in acute kidney injury (AKI), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and dialysis because of concerns regarding nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF). The position that GBCAs are absolutely contraindicated in AKI, CKD stage 4 or 5 (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <30 mL/min/1.73 m²) and dialysis-dependent patients is outdated, and may limit access to clinically necessary contrast-enhanced MRI examinations. Following a comprehensive review of the literature and reported NSF cases to date, a committee of radiologists and nephrologists developed clinical practice guidelines to assist physicians in making decisions regarding GBCA administrations. In patients with mild-to-moderate CKD (eGFR ≥30 and <60 mL/min/1.73 m²), administration of standard doses of GBCA is safe and no additional precautions are necessary. In patients with AKI, with severe CKD (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m²), or on dialysis, administration of GBCAs should be considered individually and alternative imaging modalities utilized whenever possible. If GBCAs are necessary, newer GBCAs may be administered with patient consent obtained by a physician (or their delegate), citing an exceedingly low risk (much less than 1%) of developing NSF. Standard GBCA dosing should be used; half or quarter dosing is not recommended and repeat injections should be avoided. Dialysis-dependent patients should receive dialysis; however, initiating dialysis or switching from peritoneal to hemodialysis to reduce the risk of NSF is unproven. Use of a macrocyclic ionic instead of macrocyclic nonionic GBCA or macrocyclic instead of newer linear GBCA to further prevent NSF is unproven. Gadopentetate dimeglumine, gadodiamide, and gadoversetamide remain absolutely contraindicated in patients with AKI, with stage 4 or 5 CKD, or on dialysis. The panel agreed that screening for renal disease is important but less critical when using macrocyclic and newer linear GBCAs. Monitoring for and reporting of potential cases of NSF in patients with AKI or CKD who have received GBCAs is recommended.

Gadolinium and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: an update

Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) is a multisystem disease seen exclusively in patients with renal impairment. It can be severely debilitating and sometimes fatal. There is a strong association with gadolinium-based contrast agents used in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Risk factors include renal impairment and proinflammatory conditions, e.g. major surgery and vascular events. Although there is no single effective treatment for NSF, the most successful outcomes are seen following restoration of renal function, either following recovery from acute kidney injury or following renal transplantation. There have been ten biopsy-proved pediatric cases of NSF, with no convincing evidence that children have a significantly altered risk compared with the adult population. After implementation of guidelines restricting the use of gadolinium-based contrast agents in at-risk patients, there has been a sharp reduction in new cases and no new reports in children. Continued vigilance is recommended: screening for renal impairment, use of more stable gadolinium chelates, consideration of non-contrast-enhanced MRI or alternative imaging modalities where appropriate.

Dialysis disequilibrium syndrome induced by neoplastic meningitis in a patient receiving maintenance hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Dialysis disequilibrium syndrome is characterized by neurological symptoms resulting from cerebral edema, which occurs as a consequence of hemodialysis. Dialysis disequilibrium syndrome most often occurs in patients who have just started hemodialysis, during hemodialysis, or soon after hemodialysis; although it may also occur in patients who are under maintenance hemodialysis with pre-existing neurological disease.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 70-year-old woman, who had been receiving maintenance hemodialysis for one year, was diagnosed with ovarian cancer by ascites cytological examination. Two years later, she reported severe headache and nausea during hemodialysis and was diagnosed with dialysis disequilibrium syndrome. Although brain images revealed mild hydrocephalus without any mass lesions, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma cells were detected in her cerebrospinal fluid. These findings indicated that DDS was induced by neoplastic meningitis due to ovarian cancer metastasis.

CONCLUSION

Neoplastic meningitis should be considered and excluded in hemodialysis patients with dialysis disequilibrium syndrome and malignancy by cytological examination of the cerebrospinal fluid even if cerebral imaging shows no obvious lesions. This is the first reported case of dialysis disequilibrium syndrome induced by neoplastic meningitis in a patient receiving maintenance hemodialysis.

Gadolinium-induced nephrogenic systemic fibrosis

Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis is a new disease whose incidence has peaked and receded over the past decade. It occurs in the presence of significant renal impairment, either acute or chronic (MDRD creatinine clearance of <30 mL/min/1.73 m(2)), and is associated with the administration of gadolinium-based contrast (GBC). Since 2006, the incidence of this disease has decreased markedly in patients with renal impairment, mainly owing to protocols that have not administered GBC to patients with creatinine clearances of less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m(2), and in some cases with the use of less toxic and lower doses of GBC. The purpose of this article is to review the current status of GBC use for imaging in patients with kidney disease.

MRI safety: nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and other risks

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is now a commonly used imaging modality in many neurosurgical and neurological conditions. Although generally regarded as safe, there are a number of important safety considerations. These include a recently recognised, rare condition termed nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) that occurs in patients with significant renal impairment who receive gadolinium based contrast. Currently, NSF remains poorly understood and there is no universally effective treatment beyond the avoidance of contrast in patients with significant renal impairment. Other safety considerations include MRI contraindicated devices and the role of MRI in pregnancy.

Contemporary applications and limitations of magnetic resonance imaging contrast materials

PURPOSE

Improvements in imaging technologies have dramatically increased the ability to accurately diagnose and treat many urological disease processes. As urological patients often have chronic kidney disease, the well characterized nephrotoxicity of contrast induced nephropathy when using iodine based contrast materials has long been a concern. With the development of gadolinium based contrast agents it seemed that the concern regarding nephrotoxicity had been resolved. In 1997 a new disorder, nephrogenic systemic fibrosis, appeared in patients with severe renal failure. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis is a serious and potentially devastating disorder characterized by progressive thickening and hardening of the skin and other body tissues, and complicated by flexion contractures of the joints.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a survey of the available literature on nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and magnetic resonance contrast media. We focused on mechanisms in the development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis as well as its association with magnetic resonance contrast media, disease treatment and prevention, and its relevance to clinical urology.

RESULTS

An association between nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and gadolinium based contrast agents has been reported. Gadolinium is a toxic metal and it must be chelated to be a safe injectable contrast agent. It is now hypothesized that the majority of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis cases present with gadolinium based contrast agent exposure as the triggering factor, although this mechanism has not been elucidated. As gadolinium enhanced magnetic resonance imaging is an important tool in the diagnosis and surveillance of urological diseases, the severe consequences of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis demand that practicing urologists understand and know its history and treatment strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

This review provides clarification of the gadolinium based contrast agent characteristics, tissue interactions that lead to the development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis, prevention possibilities and available treatment options.

Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: what the hospitalist needs to know

Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) has now been linked to gadolinium-based contrast (GBC) exposure in those with compromised kidney function, particularly those with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). When ESRD is present, symptoms can be quite devastating for the patient including severe pain and immobility and even death. For those at risk, avoidance of GBC exposure, whenever possible, is absolutely essential to prevent this potentially devastating complication. Identifying those at risk depends in some circumstances on appropriate recognition of renal dysfunction and understanding appropriate use of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation formulas. Although hemodialysis (but not peritoneal dialysis) removes gadolinium, the availability of dialysis should never be used as a justification for GBC use in this high-risk population. Unfortunately there is a lack of a universally effective therapy. Resolution of acute kidney injury (AKI) appears to attenuate disease in most cases, while kidney transplantation has been associated with variable success.

Skin problems in chronic kidney disease

Skin disorders associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) can markedly affect a patient's quality of life and can negatively impact their mental and physical health. Uremic pruritus, which is frequently encountered in patients with CKD, is considered to be an inflammatory systemic disease rather than a local skin disorder. Biomarkers of inflammation are increased in patients with uremic pruritus and an imbalance of the endogenous opioidergic system might be involved in the complex pathogenesis of the disease. Treatment options for uremic pruritus include emollients, topical capsaicin cream, ultraviolet B phototherapy, gabapentin, oral activated charcoal and nalfurafine, a kappa-opioid-receptor agonist. Calcific uremic arteriolopathy is triggered by an imbalance of promoters and inhibitors of vascular calcification, caused by the inflammatory changes that occur in uremia. Promising therapeutic strategies for calcific uremic arteriolopathy include bisphosphonates and intravenous sodium thiosulfate. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis is a devastating condition associated with the use of gadolinium-based contrast agents in patients with CKD. At present, no therapies are available for this complication. Preventive measures include use of iodine-based contrast agents, particularly in patients with CKD stage 4 and 5. If gadolinium contrast is necessary, administration of low volumes of the more stable macrocyclic ionic types of gadolinium-based contrast agent is advocated. Hemodialysis following gadolinium exposure might offer benefits but evidence is lacking.

Prevalence of different gadolinium enhancement patterns in patients after heart transplantation

OBJECTIVES

Transplant coronary artery disease (TCAD) limits long-term survival after heart transplantation (HTX). We hypothesized that contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) detects chronic TCAD-related myocardial infarctions (MIs), even in patients with angiographically classified mild TCAD.

BACKGROUND

Coronary angiography underestimates the TCAD-degree, subsequently missing occluded small coronary arteries and resulting MI. CE-MRI as a noninvasive imaging technique identifies infarct-typical MI and myocardial fibrosis.

METHODS

CE-MRI (gadolinium: 0.2 mmol/kg/bw) was performed in 53 HTX patients on a 1.5-T MRI scanner (Philips, Best, the Netherlands). Infarct-typical CE-MRI areas were classified as: I=<or=25%, II=25% to 50%, III=50% to 75% and IV=>or=75%. Infarct-atypical forms were divided into diffuse, spotted, intramural, and infero-septal. Coronary angiography results were reviewed qualitatively with the TCAD score (TCAD I=mild evidence; II=30% to 75%, III=>or=75% stenosis). Groups were compared with analysis of variance (statistically significant p values<or=0.05).

RESULTS

Infarct-typical CE-MRI was already present in TCAD I+II, increased significantly between groups (I=23%, II=33%, III=84%, p<0.05), and involved only single coronary territories in TCAD I but multiple vessels in TCAD II+III. Infarct-atypical CE-MRI was equally distributed across all TCAD stages (I=50% vs. II=58% vs. III=42%, p=NS) without relation to a coronary territory. Patients with only infarct-atypical CE-MRI were associated with significantly better left ventricular function compared with patients with infarct-typical or combined CE-MRI patterns (ejection fraction=66+/-6% vs. 45+/-16% or 60+/-13%; end-diastolic volume=139+/-32 ml vs. 148+/-27 ml or 164+/-43 ml; end-systolic volume=47+/-15 ml vs. 81+/-27 ml or 69+/-38 ml, p<or=0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

CE-MRI allows identification of silent MI in apparently event-free HTX patients and is able to disclose myocardial fibrosis already in patients with absent or mild angiographic TCAD. CE-MRI might be helpful to establish an earlier TCAD diagnosis and to intensify medical treatment. Future studies are necessary to test prognostic implications associated with CE-MRI patterns.