Measurement of vaginal length: Reliability of the vaginal sound--a Gynecologic Oncology Group study

Change in vaginal length and sexual function in women who undergo surgery ± radiation therapy for endometrial cancer

PURPOSE

Endometrial Cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States. Standard treatment is TAH/BSO with radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy given based on risk. Treatment can cause significant vaginal changes, including shortening, narrowing, loss of elasticity, atrophy, and dryness. These are not life threatening, but affect a woman's physical, psychological, and social functioning. Adjuvant vaginal dilator use is often advised, but there are inconsistent recommendations on use. This prospective study compared vaginal length changes and sexual function in women compliant with dilation versus not after surgery and RT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Enrolled patients underwent surgery for Stage I-IIIC EC ±RT. Vaginal dilator use was recommended for women receiving RT (external beam or brachytherapy). Vaginal length was measured with a vaginal sound and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) was used to assess sexual function.

RESULTS

Forty-one enrolled patients had sufficient data for analysis. Dilation significantly increased FSFI scores (p = 0.02) while RT without dilation showed a significant decrease (p = 0.04). Dilation helped maintain vaginal length for all patients (0 cm vs. 1.8 cm loss (p = 0.03)). Individual arms did not show statistically significant changes in length with dilation, though the trend showed RT without dilation had an average loss of 2.3 cm as compared to only 0.2 cm for regular dilation. Notably, there was no difference in length change with dilation for surgery alone versus surgery and RT (p = 0.14).

CONCLUSION

This data provides novel, prospective evidence of the benefit of vaginal dilation for maintaining vaginal length and improving sexual health after any pelvic treatment for EC. This evidence also supports that the addition of RT after surgery does not appear to significantly worsen vaginal shortening. This study has important implications for providing a strong foundation for future studies and helping to establish solid clinical management criteria for the prevention of vaginal stenosis and promotion of female sexual health.

Vaginal cuff brachytherapy: do we need to treat to more than a two-centimeter active length?

Purpose

American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) guidelines recommend using a 3-5 cm active length (AL) when treating vaginal cuff (VC) in adjuvant setting of endometrial cancer (EC). The purpose of this study was to evaluate local control and toxicity, using an AL of 1 or 2 cm and immobilization with a traditional table-mounted (stand) or patient-mounted (suspenders) device.

Material and methods

Between 2005 and 2019, 247 patients with EC were treated with adjuvant high-dose-rate vaginal cuff (HDR-VC) brachytherapy with or without external beam radiation (EBRT). Treatment was prescribed to a 0.5 cm depth, with an AL of 1 or 2 cm, using stand or suspenders. VC boost after EBRT was typically administered with 2 fractions of 5.5 Gy, while VC brachytherapy alone was typically applied with 3 fractions of 7 Gy or 5 fractions of 5.5 Gy.

Results

The combination of suspender immobilization and an AL of 2 cm (n = 126, 51%) resulted in 5-year local control of 100%. An AL of 2 cm compared to 1 cm correlated with better local control (99.1% vs. 88.5%, p = 0.0479). Regarding immobilization, suspenders correlated with improved local control compared to stand (100% vs. 86.7%, p = 0.0038). Immobilization technique was significantly correlated with AL (p < 0.0001). Only 5 (2.0%) patients experienced grade ≥ 3 toxicity, all of whom received EBRT.

Conclusions

In the present series, an AL of 2 cm provided excellent local control, while 1 cm was inadequate. Suspender immobilization was a practical alternative to stand immobilization in HDR brachytherapy of the vaginal cuff.

Vaginal stenosis in women with cervical or endometrial cancer after pelvic radiotherapy: a cross-sectional study of vaginal measurements, risk for sexual dysfunction and quality of life

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Radiotherapy (RT) for cervical (CC) and endometrial cancer (EC) is known to lead to vaginal stenosis (VS), but the comparison between vaginal anatomical measurements and the risk of sexual dysfunction presents a wide variety of results among the literature. Thus, we sought to assess the prevalence of VS, vaginal measurements, sexual dysfunction and QOL in women with CC and EC submitted to pelvic RT with or without previous surgery.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study that included 61 women with CC and 69 with EC. VS was classified by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Effects version 5.0 (CTCAE v5.0), sexual function by the validated Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and QOL by the validated World Health Organization questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF). Acrylic cylinders were used for vaginal measurements. Uni-/multivariate analyses to address factors associated with VC in both groups were performed.

RESULTS

The prevalence of VS was 79% and 67% within patients with CC and EC, respectively. Vagina length was decreased in both groups without statistical difference (7.2 ± 1.7 vs. 6.6 ± 1.8;p = 0.072). Vaginal diameter was significantly higher (p = 0.047) in women with EC (25.4 ± 6.3) than in those with CC (23.1 ± 5.7). Sexual dysfunction was highly prevalent for both CC and EC (88% vs. 91%; p = 0.598). There was no difference in all WHOQOL-BREF domains between women with CC and EC.

CONCLUSIONS

VS is highly prevalent in CC and EC patients, with vaginal length decreased in both groups but with a higher vaginal diameter in those with EC. Nevertheless, sexual dysfunction is highly prevalent in both groups.

Prospective randomized trial of email and/or telephone reminders to enhance vaginal dilator compliance in patients undergoing brachytherapy for gynecologic malignancies

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether email survey +/- telephone reminder versus no intervention would facilitate compliance with vaginal dilator use in women undergoing brachytherapy for gynecologic malignancies and to assess changes in vaginal canal (VC) length between the groups.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A 72 patients were enrolled onto a three-arm single-institution randomized prospective clinical trial and stratified by whether they received external beam radiation treatment in addition to brachytherapy and by total radiation dose to the VC. Patients were subsequently randomized to one of three groups: email survey alone, email survey + telephone reminder, or no intervention. Change in VC length over time was measured for each patient.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 17.3 months. There were no differences in patient-reported compliance between the 3 groups. Vaginal dilator compliance fell over the course of the study period and was 33% at 24 months. Baseline VC length and radiation dose were found to be the most important predictors of VC shortening over time. When accounting for baseline length, radiation dose, and follow-up time, type of intervention did not impact changes in VC length from baseline (p = 0.20).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study is the first to show the importance of baseline VC length as it relates to VC shortening following brachytherapy for gynecologic cancers and highlights the difficulties in improving VC compliance among this patient population. Further study is required to improve the incidence of late effects in this group.

Diagnostic Methods for Vaginal Stenosis and Compliance to Vaginal Dilator Use: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Vaginal stenosis (VS) is a common side effect of pelvic radiotherapy for gynecological cancer in women. It has a high incidence variability, likely due to unstandardized and subjective assessment methods. Furthermore, even though the worldwide standard treatment for VS is vaginal dilation, low compliance rates have been noted.

AIM

To evaluate the parameters used to diagnose VS and to assess whether the lack of an objective measure of VS hampers vaginal dilator use.

METHODS

A systematic review in accordance with the PRISMA reporting guidelines was conducted. PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were searched. Randomized trials and prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional studies published from January 2011 to February 2020 were included.

OUTCOMES

The main outcome of this study was a review of the published literature on assessment methods for VS and compliance to vaginal dilator use.

RESULTS

Of the 28 articles obtained, only 7 used objective methods to measure the vaginal volume. 3 studies have demonstrated patient's concern with VS development and showed a high compliance to dilator use, whereas others reported several barriers to dilator use.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Lack of an objective assessment method can be a predisposing factor for uncertain VS incidence rates and impair compliance to vaginal dilator therapy, leading to long-term VS and sexual dysfunction.

STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS

This is the first systematic review on the heterogeneity of VS evaluation methods and compliance to vaginal dilator use. All studies were comprehensively evaluated by 2 reviewers. The limitations included the heterogeneity of the study designs and the unstandardized criteria used to classify stenosis or to evaluate compliance to dilator use. Although 3 well-known databases were used, the inclusion of more data sources could have increased the number of publications included in this review.

CONCLUSION

VS is frequently diagnosed using subjective parameters. Few unstandardized objective methods are used to evaluate this condition. Regarding compliance to vaginal dilator use, there was a high dropout rate during follow-up and no consensus on starting time or ideal usage. Haddad NC, Soares Brollo LC, Pinho Oliveira MA, et al. Diagnostic Methods for Vaginal Stenosis and Compliance to Vaginal Dilator Use: A Systematic Review. J Sex Med 2021;18:493-514.

Clinical and Psychological Outcomes of the Use of Vaginal Dilators After Gynaecological Brachytherapy: a Randomized Clinical Trial

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate the dimensions of the vaginal canal in patients undergoing gynaecological brachytherapy and the effect of the use of vaginal dilators (VD) used in the follow-up of pelvic physiotherapy.

METHODS

A total of 88 patients were randomly allocated to the control group (CG) and intervention group (IG). Three evaluations were performed: pre-brachytherapy, post-brachytherapy and follow-up of 3 months. The CG received standard guidance from the health team while the IG was instructed to use VD for 3 months. The dimensions of the vaginal canal (main outcome) were defined by the length of the vagina (centimetres), width (number of full clockwise turns of the opening thread of a gynaecological speculum) and area (defined by the size of the VD). Quality of life and pelvic floor (PF) functionality were also evaluated.

RESULTS

There was no effect of the VD on vaginal length, width and area among the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. However, in the analysis stratified by adhesion, the CG had a significant decrease in the vaginal area. PF was predominantly hypoactive throughout the follow-up. Quality of life improved in both groups, but the reduction of constipation, vaginal dryness and stress urinary incontinence manifested only in the IG.

CONCLUSION

The use of VD did not alter the dimensions of the vaginal canal within the first 3 months after the end of radiotherapy treatment. However, there was a large sample loss during follow-up so studies with a larger sample number and longer follow-up time need to be conducted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03090217.

Literature Review of Vaginal Stenosis and Dilator Use in Radiation Oncology

PURPOSE

Guidelines for the care of women undergoing pelvic radiation therapy (RT) recommend vaginal dilator therapy (VDT) to prevent radiation-induced vaginal stenosis (VS); however, no standard protocol exists. This review seeks to update our current state of knowledge concerning VS and VDT in radiation oncology.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A comprehensive literature review (1972-2017) was conducted using search terms "vaginal stenosis," "radiation," and "vaginal dilator." Information was organized by key concepts including VS definition, time course, pathophysiology, risk factors, and interventions.

RESULTS

VS is a well-described consequence of pelvic RT, with early manifestations and late changes evolving over several years. Strong risk factors for VS include RT dose and volume of vagina irradiated. Resultant vaginal changes can interfere with sexual function and correlational studies support the use of preventive VDT. The complexity of factors that drive noncompliance with VDT is well recognized. There are no prospective data to guide optimal duration of VDT, and the consistency with which radiation oncologists monitor VS and manage its consequences is unknown.

CONCLUSIONS

This review provides information concerning VS definition, pathophysiology, and risk factors and identifies domains of VDT practice that are understudied. Prospective efforts to monitor and measure outcomes of patients who are prescribed VDT are needed to guide practice.

Factors associated with changes in vaginal length and diameter during pelvic radiotherapy for cervical cancer

OBJECTIVES

This study reports the incidence and factors associated with vaginal stenosis and changes in vaginal dimensions after pelvic radiotherapy for cervical cancer.

METHODS

A descriptive longitudinal study with 139 women with cervical cancer was conducted from January 2013 to November 2015. The outcome variables were vaginal stenosis assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v3.0) and changes in vaginal diameter and length after the end of radiotherapy. Independent variables were the characteristics of the neoplasm, clinical and sociodemographic data. Bivariate analysis was carried out using χ ², Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney's test. Multiple analysis was carried out using Poisson regression and a generalized linear model.

RESULTS

Most women (50.4%) had stage IIIB tumors. According to CTCAE v3.0 scale, 30.2% had no stenosis, 69.1% had grade 1 and 0.7% had grade 2 stenosis after radiotherapy. Regarding changes in vaginal measures, the mean variation in diameter was - 0.6 (± 1.7) mm and the mean variation in length was - 0.6 (± 1.3) cm. In the final statistical model, having tumoral invasion of the vaginal walls (coefficient + 0.73, p < 0.01) and diabetes (coefficient + 1.16; p < 0.01) were associated with lower vaginal stenosis and lower reduction of vaginal dimensions. Advanced clinical stage (coefficient + 1.44; p = 0.02) and receiving brachytherapy/teletherapy (coefficient - 1.17, p < 0.01) were associated with higher reduction of vaginal dimensions.

CONCLUSIONS

Most women had mild vaginal stenosis with slight reductions in both diameter and length of the vaginal canal. Women with tumoral invasion of the vagina have an increase in vaginal length soon after radiotherapy due to a reduction in tumoral volume.

American Brachytherapy Task Group Report: Adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy for early-stage endometrial cancer: A comprehensive review

This article aims to review the risk stratification of endometrial cancer, treatment rationale, outcomes, treatment planning, and treatment recommendations of vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) in the postoperative management of endometrial cancer patients. The authors performed a thorough review of the literature and reference pertinent articles pertaining to the aims of this review. Adjuvant VBT for early-stage endometrial cancer patients results in very low rates of vaginal recurrence (0-3.1%) with low rates of late toxicity which are primarily vaginal in nature. Post-Operative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Cancer 2 (PORTEC-2) supports that VBT results in noninferior rates of vaginal recurrence compared to external beam radiotherapy for the treatment of high-intermediate risk patients. VBT as a boost after external beam radiotherapy, in combination with chemotherapy, and for high-risk histologies have shown excellent results as well though randomized data do not exist supporting VBT boost. There are many different applicators, dose-fractionation schedules, and treatment planning techniques which all result in favorable clinical outcomes and low rates of toxicity. Recommendations have been published by the American Brachytherapy Society and the American Society of Radiation Oncology to help guide practitioners in the use of VBT. Data support that patients and physicians prefer joint decision making regarding the use of VBT, and patients often desire additional treatment for a marginal benefit in risk of recurrence. Discussions regarding adjuvant therapy for endometrial cancer are best performed in a multidisciplinary setting, and patients should be counseled properly regarding the risks and benefits of adjuvant therapy.

Predictors of vaginal stenosis after intravaginal high-dose-rate brachytherapy for endometrial carcinoma

PURPOSE

Intravaginal high-dose-rate brachytherapy is an effective adjuvant treatment for localized endometrial carcinoma. However, relatively little is known about risk factors of post-treatment vaginal stenosis (VS).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We included patients treated with brachytherapy for endometrial carcinoma from September 2011 to January 2014 with at least 3 months of followup. Patients who received external beam radiation therapy were excluded. VS was prospectively graded at each followup visit per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03. χ(2) and t test analyses were used to assess the association of VS with various patient, tumor, treatment, and post-treatment factors. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of VS Grade ≥1 and ≥2.

RESULTS

All 101 patients were disease free at last followup. Mean followup was 12.9 months (range, 3-34). Highest VS grades were zero in 67%, one in 26%, two in 6%, and three in 1%. Borderline significant variables associated with Grade ≥1 VS included vagina length, proportion of vagina treated, and total dose. Dilator use was significantly associated with Grade ≥2. Multivariable analysis revealed that proportion of vagina treated >60% (odds ratio [OR], 3.48; p = 0.009) and total dose >14 Gy (OR, 4.27; p = 0.015) were independent predictors of Grade ≥1 VS, and lack of consistent dilator use was an independent predictor of Grade ≥2 VS (OR, 5.60; p = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with a higher total dose to a larger proportion of the vagina were more likely to develop Grade ≥1 VS. Consistent dilator use may also be protective against Grade ≥2 VS.

Vaginal dilator therapy for women receiving pelvic radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Vaginal dilation therapy is advocated after pelvic radiotherapy to prevent stenosis (abnormal narrowing of the vagina), but can be uncomfortable and psychologically distressing.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of different types of vaginal dilation methods offered to women treated by pelvic radiotherapy for cancer.

SEARCH METHODS

Searches included the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2013, Issue 5), MEDLINE (1950 to June week 2, 2013), EMBASE (1980 to 2013 week 24) and CINAHL (1982 to 2013).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Comparative data of any type, which evaluated dilation or penetration of the vagina after pelvic radiotherapy treatment for cancer.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed whether potentially relevant studies met the inclusion criteria. We found no trials and therefore analysed no data.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified no studies for inclusion in the original review or for this update. However, we felt that some studies that were excluded warranted discussion. These included one randomised trial (RCT), which showed no improvement in sexual scores associated with encouraging women to practise dilation therapy; a recent small RCT that did not show any advantage to dilation over vibration therapy during radiotherapy; two non-randomised comparative studies; and five correlation studies. One of these showed that objective measurements of vaginal elasticity and length were not linked to dilation during radiotherapy, but the study lacked power. One study showed that women who dilated tolerated a larger dilator, but the risk of objectivity and bias with historical controls was high. Another study showed that the vaginal measurements increased in length by a mean of 3 cm after dilation was introduced 6 to 10 weeks after radiotherapy, but there was no control group; another case series showed the opposite. Three recent studies showed less stenosis associated with prophylactic dilation after radiotherapy. One small case series suggested that dilation years after radiotherapy might restore the vagina to a functional length.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no reliable evidence to show that routine, regular vaginal dilation during radiotherapy treatment prevents stenosis or improves quality of life. Several observational studies have examined the effect of dilation therapy after radiotherapy. They suggest that frequent dilation practice is associated with lower rates of self reported stenosis. This could be because dilation is effective or because women with a healthy vagina are more likely to comply with dilation therapy instructions compared to women with strictures. We would normally suggest that a RCT is needed to distinguish between a casual and causative link, but pilot studies highlight many reasons why RCT methodology is challenging in this area.

Nursing research in the Gynecologic Oncology Group

OBJECTIVES

To review nursing science history within the Gynecology Oncology Group (GOG); to discuss challenges of nursing science in the cooperative group (CG) using a current nurse-led protocol (GOG-0259) as an exemplar; and to propose recommendations to advance nursing science in the CG setting.

DATA SOURCES

Indexed citations and personal experience.

CONCLUSION

Benefits of CG research include opportunities for inter-disciplinary collaboration and ability to rapidly accrue large national samples. Challenges include limited resources to support non-treatment trials, a burdensome protocol approval process, and lack of experience with nursing/quality-of-life intervention studies. Formal GOG structures need to evolve to encourage nurse scientists to become active members; promote collaboration between experienced GOG advanced practice nurses and nurse scientists to identify nursing research priorities; and consider new funding sources to support pilot intervention studies.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Understanding the CG research process is critical for nurse scientists. A multi-disciplinary team of CG leaders can help investigators navigate a complex research environment and increase awareness of the value of nursing research.