Phase II study of irinotecan plus doxorubicin for early recurrent or platinum-refractory ovarian cancer: interim analysis

Hyaluronic Acid Nanoparticles for Immunogenic Chemotherapy of Leukemia and T-Cell Lymphoma

Ratiometric delivery of combination chemotherapy can achieve therapeutic efficacy based on synergistic interactions between drugs. It is critical to design such combinations with drugs that complement each other and reduce cancer growth through multiple mechanisms. Using hyaluronic acid (HA) as a carrier, two chemotherapeutic agents—doxorubicin (DOX) and camptothecin (CPT)—were incorporated and tested for their synergistic potency against a broad panel of blood-cancer cell lines. The pair also demonstrated the ability to achieve immunogenic cell death by increasing the surface exposure levels of Calreticulin, thereby highlighting its ability to induce apoptosis via an alternate pathway. Global proteomic profiling of cancer cells treated with HA–DOX–CPT identified pathways that could potentially predict patient sensitivity to HA–DOX–CPT. This lays the foundation for further exploration of integrating drug delivery and proteomics in personalized immunogenic chemotherapy.

Role of synergy and immunostimulation in design of chemotherapy combinations: An analysis of doxorubicin and camptothecin

Combination chemotherapy is often employed to improve therapeutic efficacies of drugs. However, traditional combination regimens often utilize drugs at or near-their maximum tolerated doses (MTDs), elevating the risk of dose-related toxicity and impeding their clinical success. Further, high doses of adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapies can cause myeloablation, which compromises the immune response and hinders the efficacy of chemotherapy as well as accompanying treatments such as immunotherapy. Clinical outcomes can be improved if chemotherapy combinations are designed to reduce the overall doses without compromising their therapeutic efficacy. To this end, we investigated a combination of camptothecin (CPT) with doxorubicin (DOX) as a low-dose treatment option for breast cancer. DOX-CPT combinations were synergistic in several breast cancer cell lines in vitro and one particular ratio displayed extremely high synergy on human triple negative breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231). This combination led to excellent long-term survival of mice bearing MDA-MB-231 tumors at doses roughly five-fold lower than the reported MTD values of its constituent drugs. Impact of low dose DOX-CPT treatment on local tumor immune environment was assessed in immunocompetent mice bearing breast cancer (4T1) tumors. The combination was not only superior in inhibiting the disease progression compared to individual drugs, but it also generated a more favorable antitumor immunogenic response. Engineering DOX and CPT ratios to manifest synergy enables treatment at doses much lower than their MTDs, which could ultimately facilitate their translation into the clinic as a promising combination for breast cancer treatment.

Hyaluronic acid-decorated dual responsive nanoparticles of Pluronic F127, PLGA, and chitosan for targeted co-delivery of doxorubicin and irinotecan to eliminate cancer stem-like cells

Dual responsive nanoparticles are developed for co-delivery of multiple anticancer drugs to target the drug resistance mechanisms of cancer stem-like cells (CSCs). The nanoparticles consist of four polymers approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for medical use: Poly(d,l-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA), Pluronic F127 (PF127), chitosan, and hyaluronic acid (HA). By combining PLGA and PF127 together, more stable and uniform-sized nanoparticles can be obtained than using PLGA or PF127 alone. The HA is used for not only actively targeting CSCs to reduce their drug resistance due to dormancy (i.e., slow metabolism), but also replacing the commonly used poly(vinyl alcohol) as a stabilizing agent to synthesize the nanoparticles using the double-emulsion approach and to allow for acidic pH-triggered drug release and thermal responsiveness. Besides minimizing drug efflux from CSCs, the nanoparticles encapsulated with doxorubicin hydrochloride (DOX, hydrophilic) and irinotecan (CPT, hydrophobic) to inhibit the activity of topoisomerases II and I, respectively, can fight against the CSC drug resistance associated with their enhanced DNA repair and anti-apoptosis. Ultimately, the two drugs-laden nanoparticles can be used to efficiently destroy the CSCs both in vitro and in vivo with up to ∼500 times of enhancement compared to the simple mixture of the two drugs.

Synergistic antitumor activity of camptothecin-doxorubicin combinations and their conjugates with hyaluronic acid

Combinations of topoisomerase inhibitors I and II have been found to synergistically inhibit cancer cell growth in vitro, yet clinical studies of these types of combinations have not progressed beyond phase II trials. The results of clinical combinations of topoisomerase (top) I and II inhibitors typically fall within one of two categories: little to no improvement in therapeutic efficacy, or augmented toxicity compared to the single drug counterparts. Hence, despite the promising activity of top I and II inhibitor combinations in vitro, their clinical applicability has not been realized. Here, we report the use of polymer-drug conjugates as a means to co-deliver synergistic doses of top I and II inhibitors camptothecin (CPT) and doxorubicin (DOX) to tumors in vivo in a 4T1 breast cancer model. At specific molar ratios, DOX and CPT were found to be among the most synergistic combinations reported to date, with combination indices between 0.01 and 0.1. The identified optimal ratios were controllably conjugated to hyaluronic acid, and elicited significant tumor reduction of murine 4T1 breast cancer model when administered intravenously. This study elucidates a method to identify synergistic drug combinations and translate them to in vivo by preserving the synergistic ratio via conjugation to a carrier polymer, thus opening a promising approach to translate drug combinations to clinically viable treatment regimens.

A phase I study of irinotecan and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in recurrent ovarian cancer (Tohoku Gynecologic Cancer Unit 104 study)

Purpose

A phase I clinical study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended dose (RD) of irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) in CPT-11/pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) combination therapy, a novel treatment regimen for platinum- and taxane-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer.

Methods

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin was administered intravenously on day 3 at a fixed dose of 30 mg/m². CPT-11 was administered intravenously on days 1 and 15, at a dose of 50 mg/m² on both days. One course of chemotherapy was 28 days, and patients were given a maximum of six courses, with the CPT-11 dose being increased in increments of 10 mg/m² (level 1, 50 mg/m²; level 2, 60 mg/m²; level 3, 70 mg/m²; level 4, 80 mg/m²) to determine MTD and RD.

Results

During the period from April 2010 to March 2013, three patients were enrolled for each level. In the first course, no dose-limiting toxicity occurred in any of the patients. Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in two of three patients at level 4. At level 4, the antitumor effect was a partial response (PR) in two of the three patients and stable disease (SD) in one. At level 3, one of the three patients showed PR and two had SD. At level 4, the start of the next course was postponed in two of three patients. In addition, one patient at level 4 experienced hemotoxicity that met the criteria for dose reduction in the next course. The above results suggested that administration of CPT-11 at dose level 5 (90 mg/m²) would result in more patients with severe neutropenia and in more patients requiring postponement of the next course or a dose reduction. Based on the above, the RD of CPT-11 was determined to be 80 mg/m².

Conclusions

The results suggest that CPT-11/PLD combination therapy for recurrent ovarian cancer is a useful treatment method with a high response rate and manageable adverse reactions. In the future phase II study, the safety and efficacy of this therapy will be assessed at 80 mg/m² of CPT-11 and 30 mg/m² of PLD.

The changing landscape of therapeutic strategies for recurrent ovarian cancer

Advanced epithelial ovarian cancer, cancer of the fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer have a poor prognosis and a high rate of disease recurrence following primary therapy. Recurrent ovarian cancer is currently classified according to sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy. Data on targeted therapy provide evidence of improvement with systemic treatment in addition to chemotherapy. Other strategies, although not proven in randomized trials, offer interesting options for future research and therapeutic development. In this review, the covered treatment modalities include surgery, chemotherapy and targeted therapy, immunological approaches and irradiation.

Management strategies for recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer

Although ovarian cancer is often a chemosensitive malignancy, patients who are resistant to platinum-based chemotherapy represent a therapeutic challenge. Currently, the only drugs that are US FDA approved to treat this subset of patients are paclitaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) and topotecan. The response rates with these agents is in the 10-15% range and overall survival is around 12 months. Other drugs that have shown some activity in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer include the taxane analogues, oral etoposide, pemetrexed and bevacizumab. Unfortunately, randomized phase III trials of second-line chemotherapy in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer have not shown an advantage over existing therapy with respect to progression-free survival or overall survival. The only trial that has reported a significant progression-free survival advantage over standard therapy is a randomized phase II trial of PLD with or without EC145, a folate-linked vinca alkaloid. Final survival results of this trial are pending.

Overcoming platinum resistance in ovarian carcinoma

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Ovarian cancer remains a deadly malignancy because most patients develop recurrent disease that is resistant to chemotherapy, including platinum. Because response rates for current treatment regimens are relatively similar and unfortunately low, no standard chemotherapy for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer exists.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

A systematic literature review of clinical studies published between January 2005 and March 2010 was conducted using search engines, PubMed and MEDLINE with the entry keywords 'ovarian cancer' and 'platinum resistance'. This search revealed 40 clinical trials (1793 patients).

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

Gemcitabine was the most common drug used in clinical trials reporting higher response rates, ≥ +1 SD of overall response rate (5 out of 8). Gemcitabine-based combination therapy showed an average response rate of 27.2% (95% CI, 22.4-32.0). Combination of gemcitabine and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) was the most common regimen (n = 3) and was associated with possible additive effects in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients: response rate, gemcitabine alone 6.1%, PLD alone 19.8%, and gemcitabine with PLD 28.7% (95% CI, 20.4-37.0), respectively.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Analysis of recent clinical trials showed that gemcitabine-based combination chemotherapy was associated with the highest antitumor effects in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients during the study period.

Key role of topoisomerase I inhibitors in the treatment of recurrent and refractory epithelial ovarian carcinoma

Ovarian cancer remains one of the most difficult gynecologic cancers to treat, owing to its aggressive biology and high relapse rate, as well as the toxic side effects of available chemotherapeutic agents used to treat recurrent disease. Topoisomerase I inhibitors, including topotecan and irinotecan, are some of the most effective and tolerable treatment options for recurrent ovarian cancer. The ideal dosing, timing of administration, role in combination with other chemotherapies or biologics and potential role in up-front therapy remains an area of active research. This article reviews the mechanism of action of topoisomerase I inhibitors and the efficacy, dosing, schedule and toxicity for topotecan, irinotecan, 9-nitrocamptothecin, DX-8951 and 9-aminocamptothecin. Conclusions include a discussion of future avenues of research and ongoing projects.

Prognostic factors associated with response in platinum retreatment of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer

The goal of this study was to determine the factors associated with response to platinum retreatment in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. A review of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer retreated with cisplatin or carboplatin between 2002 and 2004 was performed. The platinum-free interval (PFI) and treatment-free interval (TFI) were determined for each patient. Response was based on serial CA125 levels using a modification of the Rustin criteria. Patients with clinical benefit ([CB] those who attained at least stable disease) were compared to patients with disease progression (PD). An analysis was performed to determine factors associated with CB in platinum-resistant patients retreated with platinum. Of 48 patients identified, 37 were evaluable included in this analysis. CB was observed in 27 (73%) while disease progression was noted in 10 (27%) women. The PFI was longer in those women who achieved CB (12.3 vs 6.9 months; P = 0.02). The TFI was 7.1 months for patients benefited from platinum retreatment vs 3.5 months for those with disease progression (P = 0.06). There was no statistically significant difference in the number of cytotoxic agents between the time of platinum retreatment and the prior platinum regimen (2 vs 1.5 months; P = 0.61). A prolonged PFI was associated with an improved chance of achieving CB with platinum retreatment. There was no association between the response to platinum retreatment and the number of intervening cytotoxic agents utilized. Further prospective study is warranted to define the optimal timing of platinum retreatment.