Survival impact of lymph node dissection in endometrial adenocarcinoma: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results analysis

Range of Resection in Endometrial Cancer-Clinical Issues of Made-to-Measure Surgery

Endometrial cancer (EC) poses a significant health issue among women, and its incidence has been rising for a couple of decades. Surgery remains its principal treatment method and may have a curative, staging, or palliative aim. The type and extent of surgery depends on many factors, and the risks and benefits should be carefully weighed. While simple hysterectomy might be sufficient in early stage EC, modified-radical hysterectomy is sometimes indicated. In advanced disease, the evidence suggests that, similarly to ovarian cancer, optimal cytoreduction improves survival rate. The role of lymphadenectomy in EC patients has long been a controversial issue. The rationale for systematic lymphadenectomy and the procedure of the sentinel lymph node biopsy are thoroughly discussed. Finally, the impact of the molecular classification and new International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system on EC treatment is outlined. Due to the increasing knowledge on the pathology and molecular features of EC, as well as the new advances in the adjuvant therapies, the surgical management of EC has become more complex. In the modern approach, it is essential to adjust the extent of the surgery to a specific patient, ensuring an optimal, made-to-measure personalized surgery. This narrative review focuses on the intricacies of surgical management of EC and aims at summarizing the available literature on the subject, providing an up-to-date clinical guide.

Therapeutic role of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Lymph nodal involvement is a prognostic factor in endometrial cancer. The added value of para-aortic lymphadenectomy compared with pelvic nodal evaluation alone remains a matter of debate in the management of patients with intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess the prognostic value of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in terms of overall survival and disease-free survival in patients with intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer.

METHODS

The study adhered to the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Google Scholar and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from January 2000 to April 2023. Studies on intermediate- and high-risk patients who underwent pelvic versus pelvic and para-aortic dissection were included in the analysis. The Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies (MINORS) and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool (QUADAS-2) were used for quality assessment of the selected articles.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were identified, encompassing 9415 patients with a median age of 62 years (IQR 56.5-66.5). The majority had International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I-II disease (76%) and endometrioid histology (89%). The 72% of patients who underwent only pelvic nodal evaluation and the 87% who underwent pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy received adjuvant treatment (p=0.44). Pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy was associated with a significant improvement in 5-year overall survival (RR=0.71, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.88, p<0.01), translating to a 41% reduction in the risk of overall death. However, no significant differences were observed in the 5-year risk of recurrence (RR=1.12, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.34, p=0.15). Additionally, patients undergoing pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy experienced a 26% increased risk of post-operative complications (RR=1.26, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.53, p=0.03) and prolonged operative times (MD=56.27, 95% CI 15.94 to 96.60, p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy appears to confer a prognostic benefit in patients with intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer. Robust prospective studies are needed to further validate these findings and elucidate the precise role of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the optimal management of these patients.

Lymphatic Complications Following Sentinel Node Biopsy or Pelvic Lymphadenectomy for Endometrial Cancer

Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) is performed worldwide in patients with endometrial cancer (EC). The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the occurrence rate of lymphatic complications between SNB and pelvic lymphadenectomy (LND) for EC. The medical records of women who underwent SNB or pelvic LND for EC between September 2012 and April 2022 were assessed. A total of 388 patients were enrolled in the current study. Among them, 201 patients underwent SNB and 187 patients underwent pelvic LND. The occurrence rates of lower-extremity lymphedema (LEL) and pelvic lymphocele (PL) were compared between the patients who underwent SNB and those who underwent pelvic LND. The SNB group had a significantly lower occurrence rate of lower-extremity LEL than the pelvic LND group (2.0% vs. 21.3%, p < 0.01). There were no patients who had PL in the SNB group; however, 4 (2.1%) patients in the pelvic LND group had PL. The occurrence rates of lower-extremity LEL and PL were significantly lower in patients who underwent SNB than those who underwent pelvic LND. SNB for EC has a lower risk of lymphatic complications compared to systemic LND.

Impact of examined lymph node number on lymph node status and prognosis in FIGO stage IB-IIA cervical squamous cell carcinoma: A population-based study

Objective

We aimed to investigate the association of examined lymph node (ELN) number with lymph node status and long-term survival in FIGO stage IB-IIA cervical squamous cell carcinoma(CSCC) and to determine the minimum number of ELN associated with survival improvement.

Method

Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database of FIGO stage IB-IIA CSCC patients undergoing hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in 2004-2016 were analyzed to explore the relationship between ELN number and lymph node status and overall survival (OS) by using the multivariable approach. The estimated probability of falsely identifying a patient as node-negative and the hazard ratios (HRs) for each ELN was fitted with a LOWESS smoother, and the structural breakpoints were determined. X-tile software was used to determine the optimal cutoff value for ELNs.

Results

A total of 2627 patients were analyzed. The optimal cutoff value of the ELN number was identified as 7 based on the results of X-tile software. The structural breakpoints according to the associations between the number of ELNs and the estimated risk of false-negative lymph node dissection and HRs for overall survival were 9 and 8, respectively. The multivariate analysis indicated that ELN number was an independent prognostic factor for OS, both as a continuous or categorical variable. To further explore the effect of more ELNs on survival, another cutoff value of 17 was chosen to compare the survival curves of patients. The multivariate-adjusted COX model showed that patients with ELN<8 had a significantly higher risk of death than those with ELN8-17 (HR=1.447, 95% CI =1.075-1.947, p=0.015), but there was no significant difference in overall survival between patients with ELN>17 and patients with ELN8-17 (HR=0.822, 95%CI =0.665-1.016, p=0.070).

Conclusion

A sufficient number of ELNs was associated with better long-term survival in FIGO stage IB-IIA CSCC. At least 8 ELNs need to be examined for prognostic stratification. Excessive lymph node dissection (ELN>17) may not confer additional survival benefits.

Lymphadenectomy for high-grade endometrial cancer: Does it impact lymph node recurrence?

INTRODUCTION

The diagnostic role of lymph node (LN) assessment is established in endometrial cancer. Our study assesses whether surgical removal of metastatic LNs has oncologic benefit in high-grade endometrial cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

High-grade endometrial cancer cases (2000-2010) were collected from two tertiary cancer centres. In patients with at least one positive LN, recurrence free survival (RFS) was compared by the number of LNs removed. Factors predicting nodal recurrence (NR) were explored. Univariate statistical analyses by log rank test and multivariable cox proportional hazards model were performed using SAS version 9.4.

RESULTS

Of 570 patients identified, 334 patients underwent staging lymphadenectomy, 74 (22.2%) patients had at least one positive LN. The median RFS with at least one positive lymph node was 87.1 months (95% CI ≥ 14.3) when greater than 15 LNs were removed, compared to 16.9 months (95% CI, 13.6-35.6) and 17.3 months (95% CI, 8.5-39.8) when 5-15 and less than 5 LNs were removed, respectively (p = 0.02). In the cohort of 570 patients, there were 167 disease recurrences with location described on imaging, 98 (58.7%) had a NR and 69 (41.3%) recurred at other sites. Multivariable modeling identified that only positive LNs at surgical staging predicted NR (HR 3.8, 95% CI 1.4-10.2).

CONCLUSION

In high-grade endometrial cancer, positive LNs predict NR, and RFS is longer with a more extensive LN dissection in women with positive LNs. Future prospective studies should evaluate the oncologic benefit of surgical removal of metastatic LNs in high-grade endometrial cancer.

Relevance of sentinel lymph node biopsy in early endometrial cancer: A series of 249 cases

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the impact of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy on adjuvant therapy, recurrence and survival in early endometrial cancer (EC).

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively included all patients who underwent SLN biopsy for EC between February 2007 and March 2018.

RESULTS

Of the 249 EC patients included, the overall SLN detection rate was 91 %. SLNs were positive in 36 (14.4 %) cases. Nine of the 13 preoperative low-risk patients with positive SLNs were re-operated and 22 % presented positive non-SLNs. No second surgery was required for the 10 patients upstaged to intermediate risk after negative SLN biopsy. Nine of the 11 preoperative intermediate-risk patients with positive SLNs were re-operated and 33 % presented positive non-SLNs. Eleven of the 24 preoperative high-risk patients with negative SLNs were re-operated and 27 % presented positive non-SLNs. For the whole population, 3-year overall survival was 99 % (CI 95 % (97-1)) and 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 92 % (CI 95 % (0.87-0.95)).

CONCLUSION

Our study supports the feasibility of the SLN procedure for assessing risk recurrence in patients with early-stage EC. SLN biopsy should lead to major reductions in secondary staging and better adaptation of adjuvant therapy.

Lymphedema and Post-Operative Complications after Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy versus Lymphadenectomy in Endometrial Carcinomas-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Lymph node dissection (LND) is recommended as staging procedure in presumed low stage endometrial cancer. LND is associated with risk of lower-extremity lymphedema and post-operative complications. The sentinel lymph node (SLN) procedure has been shown to have high diagnostic accuracy, but its effects on complication risk has been little studied. This systematic review compares the risk of lower-extremity lymphedema and post-operative complications in SLN versus LND in patients with endometrial carcinoma. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed and Cochrane Library. Results: Seven retrospective and prospective studies (total n = 3046 patients) were included. Only three studies reported the odds ratio of lower-extremity lymphedema after SLN compared to LND, which was 0.05 (95% CI 0.01-0.37; p = 0.067), 0.07 (95% CI 0.00-1.21; p = 0.007) and 0.54 (95% CI 0.37-0.80; p = 0.002) in these studies. The pooled odds ratio of any post-operative complications after SLN versus LND was 0.52 (95% CI 0.36-0.73; I² = 48%; p < 0.001). For severe post-operative complications the pooled odds ratio was 0.52 (95% CI 0.28-0.96; I² = 0%; p = 0.04). Conclusions: There are strong indications that SLN results in a lower incidence of lower-extremity lymphedema and less often severe post-operative complications compared to LND. In spite of the paucity and heterogeneity of studies, direction of results was similar in all studies, supporting the aforementioned conclusion. These results support the increasing uptake of SLN procedures in endometrial cancer.

Comprehensive lymphadenectomy and survival prediction in uterine serous cancer patients after surgery: A population-based analysis

OBJECTIVE

Evidence on uterine serous cancer (USC) prognosis has been limited and inconclusive. We aim to explore the survival benefits of comprehensive lymphadenectomy in USC patients after surgery and develop a prognostic nomogram to predict survival.

METHODS

USC patients who had undergone hysterectomy between 2010 and 2015 were identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. The relationship between the extent of lymphadenectomy and survival, including overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS), was estimated with Kaplan-Meier (K-M) analysis. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were utilized to determine the independent prognostic factors. A nomogram was then developed, calibrated and internally validated.

RESULTS

A total of 2853 patients were identified. K-M survival analysis revealed that patients with ≥12 pelvic lymph nodes (PLNs) removed had significantly better OS and CSS than those without (both P < 0.001). However, patients with ≥6 para-aortic lymph nodes removed was not associated with similar survival benefits than patients without (P > 0.1). Multivariate analyses for OS and CSS revealed that age, T-stage, N-stage, tumor size, adjuvant therapy and ≥12 PLNs removed were independent prognostic factors (all P < 0.05) and were subsequently incorporated into the nomogram. The Harrell's C-index of the nomogram was significantly higher than that of the FIGO staging system (OS: 0.739 vs 0.671, P < 0.001; CSS: 0.752 vs 0.695, P < 0.001). Furthermore, the nomogram was well calibrated with satisfactory consistency.

CONCLUSIONS

Comprehensive pelvic lymphadenectomy should be recommended to USC patients for its survival benefits. And a nomogram has been developed to predict the survivals of USC patients after surgery.

Effect of Lymphadenectomy on Survival in Early-Stage Type II Endometrial Carcinoma and Carcinosarcoma

Purpose

We aimed to investigate whether systematic pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection delivers any survival advantage in a subgroup of patients with type II endometrial carcinoma and carcinosarcoma.

Methods

We evaluated 135 patients with clinically early-stage (Stage I-II) type II endometrial carcinoma and carcinosarcoma who underwent systematic pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection or who did not undergo any lymph node dissection.

Results

Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survivals (RFS) were significantly longer in the systematic lymph node dissection group (hazard ratio 0.28, 95% CI 0.13–0.62 p=0.002 for OS and hazard ratio 0.31, 95% CI 0.14–0.69 p=0.004 for RFS). Multivariate analysis showed that lymph node dissection, age, lymph node metastasis, and adjuvant therapy were independent prognostic variables of OS and RFS.

Conclusions

Systematic pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection independently and significantly prolongs the survival of patients with early-stage type II endometrial carcinoma and carcinosarcoma.

The effect of introducing pelvic lymphadenectomy on survival and recurrence rates in Danish endometrial cancer patients at high risk: a Danish Gynecological Cancer Group study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the rate of survival and recurrence related to the introduction of pelvic lymphadenectomy in Danish high-risk endometrial cancer patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Data on 713 high-risk patients defined as grade 3 with >50% myometrial invasion or serous/clear/undifferentiated carcinomas stage I-IV endometrial cancer patients diagnosed from 2005 to 2012 were retrieved from the Danish Gynecological Cancer Database. Of these, 305 were high-risk stage I. Five year Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and actuarial recurrence rates were calculated, and adjusted Cox used for comparison. Findings were compared with earlier Danish results.

RESULTS

Lymphadenectomy in 390 radically operated high-risk patients resulted in upstaging of 31 patients from stage I to IIIC and 19 patients from stage II to IIIC corresponding to 12.8%. Upstaging from stage I to IIIC had a cancer-specific survival of 77%, almost comparable to lymph node-negative high-risk stage I patients (81%). Lymphadenectomy patients had a significant higher overall survival as compared with non-lymph node resected for all patients, but not for stage I patients. Lymphadenectomy, however, did not significantly affect cancer-specific survival, progression-free survival, recurrence rate or risk of local, distant, or lymph node recurrence. When the survival of high-risk stage I patients was compared with earlier Danish results, a small improvement in overall survival (7%) and cancer-specificsurvival (8%) was demonstrated.

CONCLUSION

Only a small number of high-risk patients were upstaged from stage I to III due to lymphadenectomy. These patients showed a surprisingly good survival possibly due to correct stage identification and subsequent relevant adjuvant therapy. However, even though introduction of lymphadenectomy in the Danish high-risk population seems to increase overall survival, no significant change in cancer-specific survival, progression-free survival or recurrence patterns was demonstrated.

Lymphadenectomy and prognosis for elderly females with stage I endometrioid endometrial cancer

PURPOSE

The potential therapeutic benefits of lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (EC) patients are still ambiguous. Therefore, a population-based retrospective analysis was conducted to determine the association between lymphadenectomy and survival in elderly female patients with stage I endometrioid EC.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program database was retrospectively analyzed, and data of 63,372 female patients with early-stage type I EC from 1988 to 2013 were collected. The main patient and tumor characteristics included marital status, age, ethnicity, time of diagnosis, tumor grade, radiotherapy, and lymphadenectomy status. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were performed to determine the association between lymph node dissection and the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival in women older than 50 years with stage I endometrioid EC.

RESULTS

The majority (83.7%) of the patients who met the inclusion criteria for the study were older than 50 years. In both grade 1 and 2 patients aged over 50 years, lymph node conservation was associated with a higher mortality risk compared to lymphadenectomy (all P < 0.005). Multivariate analysis indicated that lymphadenectomy was an independent predictor of improved OS in early-stage type 1 EC patients, with hazard ratios of 0.893 and 0.827 for the grade 1 and grade 2 patients, respectively (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Lymphadenectomy could improve long-term OS in women older than 50 years with grade 1 and 2 endometrioid EC.

Lymphadenectomy in Early-Stage Intermediate-/High-Risk Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer: Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes in an Australian Cohort

Objective

The role of lymphadenectomy (LND) in early-stage endometrial cancer (EC) remains controversial. Previous studies have included low-risk patients and nonendometrioid histologies for which LND may not be beneficial, whereas long-term morbidity after LND is unclear. In a large Australian cohort of women with clinical early-stage intermediate-/high-risk endometrioid EC, we analyzed the association of LND with clinicopathological characteristics, adjuvant treatment, survival, patterns of disease recurrence, and morbidity.

Materials and Methods

From a larger prospective study (Australian National Endometrial Cancer Study), we analyzed data from 328 women with stage IA grade 3 (n = 63), stage IB grade 1 to 3 (n = 160), stage II grade 1 to 3 (n = 71), and stage IIIC1/2 grade 1 to 3 (n = 31/3) endometrioid EC. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. The association of LND with OS was assessed using Cox regression analysis adjusted for age, stage, grade, and adjuvant treatment. The association with risk of recurrent disease was analyzed using logistic regression adjusted for age, stage, and grade. Morbidity data were analyzed using χ2 tests.

Results

Median follow-up was 45.8 months. Overall survival at 3 years was 93%. Lymphadenectomy was performed in 217 women (66%), 16% of this group having positive nodes. Median node count was 12. There were no significant differences in OS between LND and no LND groups, or by number of nodes removed. After excluding stage IB grade 1/2 tumors, there was no association between LND and OS among a “high-risk” group of 190 women with a positive node rate of 24%. However, a similar cohort (n = 71) of serous EC in the Australian National Endometrial Cancer Study had improved survival after LND. Women who underwent LND had significantly higher rates of critical events (5% vs 0%, P = 0.02) and lymphoedema (23% vs 4%, P < 0.0001).

Conclusions

In this cohort with early-stage intermediate-/high-risk endometrioid EC, LND did not improve survival but was associated with significantly increased morbidity.

ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer: Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-up

The first joint European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) consensus conference on endometrial cancer was held on 11-13 December 2014 in Milan, Italy, and comprised a multidisciplinary panel of 40 leading experts in the management of endometrial cancer. Before the conference, the expert panel prepared three clinically-relevant questions about endometrial cancer relating to the following four areas: prevention and screening, surgery, adjuvant treatment and advanced and recurrent disease. All relevant scientific literature, as identified by the experts, was reviewed in advance. During the consensus conference, the panel developed recommendations for each specific question and a consensus was reached. Results of this consensus conference, together with a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation, are detailed in this article. All participants have approved this final article.

ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

The first joint European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) consensus conference on endometrial cancer was held on 11-13 December 2014 in Milan, Italy, and comprised a multidisciplinary panel of 40 leading experts in the management of endometrial cancer. Before the conference, the expert panel prepared three clinically relevant questions about endometrial cancer relating to the following four areas: prevention and screening, surgery, adjuvant treatment and advanced and recurrent disease. All relevant scientific literature, as identified by the experts, was reviewed in advance. During the consensus conference, the panel developed recommendations for each specific question and a consensus was reached. Results of this consensus conference, together with a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation, are detailed in this article. All participants have approved this final article.

Survival analysis of pelvic lymphadenectomy alone versus combined pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients exhibiting endometrioid type endometrial cancer

The therapeutic benefit of lymphadenectomy in patients exhibiting endometrial cancer (EC) remains controversial. The aim of the present study was to determine whether the addition of para-aortic lymphadenectomy to pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLND) improves survival in patients with endometrioid type EC. A single tertiary-center, retrospective analysis was conducted in a total of 186 patients who were surgically treated with either PLND alone (n=97) or combined pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy (PPaLND; n=89). Adjuvant treatments were assigned according to the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) risk of recurrence analysis. The primary endpoint of the present study was progression-free survival (PFS). The median follow-up time was 38 months (95% confidence interval, 36.47-42.90) for all patients. No statistically significant differences were identified between the two groups in terms of overall survival (OS), PFS or time to progression (TTP). Kaplan-Meier estimates of three-year OS, PFS and TTP for patients with low or low-intermediate risk were as follows: PLND, 100, 98.7 and 98.7%, respectively; and PPaLND, all 100%. The estimated three-year OS, PFS and TTP for patients with high or high-intermediate risk were as follows: PLND, 92.3, 81.3 and 81.3%; and PPaLND, 90.7, 77.1 and 80.9%, respectively. No statistically significant differences were detected in the three-year OS, PFS and TTP between the lymphadenectomy groups, regardless of the GOG risk of recurrence (PLND, 98.4, 95.3 and 95.3%; and PPaLND, 94.9, 87.1 and 89.4%). Therefore, the combination treatment, PPaLND did not provide any survival advantage over pelvic lymphadenectomy alone.

[Endometrial carcinoma. Application of the guidelines of 2010: multicentre trial]

The endometrial cancer is the most frequent gynecological cancer. To improve and homogenize the professional practices of endometrial cancer, guidelines were developed in November 2010. The aim of this study is to estimate the implementation of these recommendations. This is a retrospective multicentre study, using the databases of three French centers made between November 2010 and December 2012: the university hospital in Reims, the Tenon hospital in Paris and the Cancer Center Georges-François-Leclerc in Dijon. This study consists in the evaluation of the diagnoses and therapeutic assessment modalities for women with endometrial cancer and the concordance with the INCa guidelines. During this study, 161 patients were treated for an endometrial cancer. A histological and radiological preoperative assessment was respectively made in 92.5% and 73.3% of the cases. It revealed an agreement between anatomo-radiologic pre- and postoperative in 62.3% and 53.4% of the cases for myometrial invasion and the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetric classification. The surgical modalities were in agreement with the guidelines in 64.6% (n = 104) and 60.3% (n = 97) of the cases. The discrepancy of the guidelines resulted from the absence or the excess realization of a lymphadenectomy. An adjuvant therapy was administered in 67.1% (n = 108) of the cases and was in agreement with the guidelines in 62.3% of the cases. s The pre- and postoperative discordance between histological and radiological results are at the origin of a default in treatment for certain patients. This discordance leads to excess or lack of nodes exploration.

A study of pelvic and para-aortic lymph node involvement in surgically staged endometrioid carcinoma of endometrium

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of the depth of myometrial invasion and tumor grade on lymph node involvement in endometrial carcinoma.

METHODS

Patients with endometrioid carcinoma of endometrium who underwent surgical staging between January 1999 and September 2010 under the division of gynecologic oncology were studied retrospectively. Patients treated by radiotherapy or chemotherapy before surgeries were excluded.

RESULTS

The study group included 61 patients. Six patients had lymph node metastasis, of which 83.3 % had >50 % myometrial invasion (P = 0.052). Grades 1, 2, and 3 were each seen in 33.3 % of them (P = 0.061). When the study group was divided into two sets, namely, those with <50 and >50 % myometrial invasion, the odds ratio was 10.3, which means that the chance of the prevalence of lymph node metastasis in the latter group is 10 times more.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the P value was not significant, the odds ratio reveals that there is an increased risk of lymph node positivity with deeper myometrial invasion. Surgical staging needs to be done for all operable cases of carcinoma endometrium to determine the prognosis and further management.

Cause-specific effects of radiotherapy and lymphadenectomy in stage I-II endometrial cancer: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy and lymphadenectomy have been associated with improved survival in population-based studies of endometrial cancer, which is in contrast with findings from randomized trials and meta-analyses. The primary study aim was to estimate the cause-specific effects of adjuvant radiotherapy and lymphadenectomy on competing causes of mortality.

METHODS

We analyzed Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data from 1988 to 2006. The sample comprised 58172 patients with stage I and II endometrial adenocarcinoma. Patients were risk stratified by stage, grade, and age. Cumulative incidences and cause-specific hazards of competing causes of mortality were estimated according to treatment. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

Pelvic radiotherapy was associated with statistically significantly increased endometrial cancer mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.52 to 1.82) in all stage I and II patients and decreased noncancer mortality in intermediate and high-risk stage I and II patients (HR = 0.82; 95% CI = 0.77 to 0.89). Lymphadenectomy was associated with increased endometrial cancer mortality in stage I patients (HR = 1.27; 95% CI = 1.16 to 1.39), decreased endometrial cancer mortality in stage II patients (HR = 0.61; 95% CI = 0.52 to 0.72), and decreased noncancer mortality in both stage I and II patients (HR = 0.84; 95% CI = 0.80 to 0.88). Effects of radiotherapy and lymphadenectomy on second cancer mortality varied according to risk strata.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiotherapy and lymphadenectomy are associated with statistically significantly reduced noncancer mortality in stage I and II endometrial cancer. The improved overall survival associated with these treatments reported from SEER studies is largely attributable to their selective application in healthier patients rather than their effects on endometrial cancer.

Determinants of lymph node count in endometrial cancer surgical staging

OBJECTIVE

Lymphadenectomy is a fundamental procedure in gynecologic oncology, but there is an ongoing debate concerning its indication in endometrial cancer. Lymph node (LN) count has been used as a surrogate marker for quality of staging in endometrial cancer. Because of variability in reported LN counts in the literature and within our practice, we aimed to better understand the factors that influence the final LN count in endometrial cancer staging.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective case study of patients with endometrial cancer who underwent surgical staging at our institution between April 1, 2005, and February 3, 2007. Linear regression was used to determine the association between LN count and a series of predictor variables.

RESULTS

Of 131 patients, 100 patients (76%) had stage I disease and 9 patients (7%) had LN metastasis. The mean (SD) LN count was 9.5 (7.8). We found no significant difference in LN count according to age, tumor histology, stage, or surgeon. Lymph node count decreased by 1 for each 5-unit (kg/m(2)) increase in body mass index (coefficient, -0.2; P = 0.038). The strongest predictor associated with LN count was the pathologist, with 2 groups of pathologists counting an average 7.7 (P < 0.001) and 6.42 (P = 0.001) fewer LNs per case compared to the referent group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirms that LN count varies markedly. Although not the only contributor, the pathologist, we found, was the most significant determining factor in LN count variation. This highlights the need to exercise caution when drawing conclusions from published LN counts in endometrial cancer research.

Dual targeting of mTOR and aurora-A kinase for the treatment of uterine Leiomyosarcoma

PURPOSE

The significance of mTOR activation in uterine leiomyosarcoma (ULMS) and its potential as a therapeutic target were investigated. Furthermore, given that effective therapies likely require combination mTOR blockade with inhibition of other targets, coupled with recent observations suggesting that Aurora-A kinase (Aurk-A) deregulations commonly occur in ULMS, the preclinical impact of dually targeting both pathways was evaluated.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Immunohistochemical staining was used to evaluate expression of activated mTOR components in a large (>200 samples) ULMS tissue microarray. Effects of mTOR blockade (using rapamycin) and Aurk-A inhibition (using MLN8237) alone and in combination on human ULMS cell growth, cell-cycle progression, and apoptosis were assessed in cellular assays. Drug interactions were determined via combination index analyses. The antitumor effects of inhibitors alone or in combination were evaluated in vivo.

RESULTS

Enhanced mTOR activation was seen in human ULMS samples. Increased pS6RP and p4EBP1 expression correlated with disease progression; p4EBP1 was found to be an independent prognosticator of patient outcome. Rapamycin inhibited growth and cell-cycle progression of ULMS cell strains/lines in culture. However, only a cytostatic effect on tumor growth was found in vivo. Combining rapamycin with MLN8237 profoundly (and synergistically) abrogated ULMS cells' growth in culture; interestingly, these effects were seen only when MLN8237 was preadministered. This novel therapeutic combination and scheduling regimen resulted in marked tumor growth inhibition in vivo.

CONCLUSIONS

mTOR and Aurk-A pathways are commonly deregulated in ULMS. Preclinical data support further exploration of dual mTOR and Aurk-A therapeutic blockade for human ULMS.

Pre-operative systemic inflammatory response markers in predicting lymph node metastasis in endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the correlation of pre-operative systemic inflammatory response (SIR) markers with lymph node (LN) metastasis compared with serum CA-125 in endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of 319 patients who were pathologically proven to have endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma after staging operations. Serum CA-125 and pre-operative SIR markers [neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), C-reactive protein (CRP), albumin, platelets and fibrinogen] were assessed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted for each SIR marker and serum CA-125.

RESULTS

NLR, PLR and serum CA-125 were higher in the LN-positive group compared with the LN-negative group (p=0.003, 0.012 and 0.025, respectively). Serum albumin was significantly lower in the LN-positive group compared with the LN-negative group (p<0.001). ROC curves demonstrated the best cut-off values for NLR (≥1.97), PLR (≥9.14), albumin (≤4.15 g/dl) and serum CA-125 (≥32.50 U/ml) for pre-operative diagnosis of LN metastasis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of serum CA-125 were 63.3%, 87.6%, 37.3%, 95.4% and 85.1%, respectively. No pre-operative SIR markers were superior to serum CA-125 in terms of sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV or accuracy, with the exception of the slightly higher sensitivity of PLR (64.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-operative SIR markers do not appear to be more effective in predicting LN metastasis than serum CA-125 in endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma.

Therapeutic role of systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic role of systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy in patients with endometrial cancer.

METHODS

From December 2003 to December 2008, 349 eligible patients who underwent surgical staging procedures at primary treatment were retrospectively analyzed: systematic lymphadenectomy group (n = 246) and no-lymphadenectomy group (n = 103). Survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Overall, patients who underwent lymphadenectomy improved 5-year disease-free survival (89.0% versus 80.7%, P = 0.019) and overall survival (92.8% versus 81.5%, P = 0.001) compared to those who did not undergo lymphadenectomy. Overall survival was not related to lymphadenectomy in 212 low-risk patients (93.1% versus 84.6%, P = 0.176). However, this association was found in 137 patients with intermediate and high-risk (86.2% versus 73.3%, P = 0.021). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that FIGO stage (P = 0.037) and lymphadenectomy (P = 0.023) were independent prognostic factors for overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy has a potentially therapeutic role on survival in surgically staged patients with endometrial cancer.

Current therapy of patients with endometrial carcinoma. A critical review

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 18-FDG positron emission tomography ((18)FDG PET-CT), and computed tomography (CT) have demonstrated disappointing detectability of lymph node metastases in endometrial cancer. The treatment of choice in patients with endometrial cancer is hysterectomy and bilateral salpingoophorectomy. Above all, obese patients with comorbidity have benefited the most from laparoscopically assisted approaches. For inoperable patients in FIGO stage I/II, radiation remains an alternative to hysterectomy. The role of pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy is the most controversial issue in endometrial carcinoma treatment. The current spectrum of treatment ranges from no lymphadenectomy, exclusive pelvic or additional inframesentric paraaortic sampling, or complete pelvic to infrarenal paraaortic lymphadenectomy. The sentinel concept in patients with endometrial carcinoma is far from being introduced into routine clinical practice. Without a lymphadenectomy, decision making for adjuvant therapy remains a challenge, because no information is available from lymph node status and the reliability of pathologic grading is poor. For patients after hysterectomy with a low risk of local relapse (stage I/II without additional risk factors), vaginal brachytherapy is sufficient to prevent vaginal relapses. Adjuvant external beam irradiation (EBRT) in stage I/II demonstrated improved local control which impacted overall survival only in patients with high-risk features (higher age, grading myometrial infiltration). Stage IIIC patients seem to benefit from EBRT with regard to overall survival. In patients at high risk of progression (grade 3, MI > 50%, FIGO IIIC, unfavorable histology), multimodal treatment should be considered. The optimal substances and sequences are under investigation.

Endometrial cancer - reduce to the minimum. A new paradigm for adjuvant treatments?

BACKGROUND

Up to now, the role of adjuvant radiation therapy and the extent of lymph node dissection for early stage endometrial cancer are controversial. In order to clarify the current position of the given adjuvant treatment options, a systematic review was performed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Both, Pubmed and ISI Web of Knowledge database were searched using the following keywords and MESH headings: "Endometrial cancer", "Endometrial Neoplasms", "Endometrial Neoplasms/radiotherapy", "External beam radiation therapy", "Brachytherapy" and adequate combinations.

CONCLUSION

Recent data from randomized trials indicate that external beam radiation therapy - particularly in combination with extended lymph node dissection - or radical lymph node dissection increases toxicity without any improvement of overall survival rates. Thus, reduced surgical aggressiveness and limitation of radiotherapy to vaginal-vault-brachytherapy only is sufficient for most cases of early stage endometrial cancer.

Trends in the utilization of adjuvant vaginal cuff brachytherapy and/or external beam radiation treatment in stage I and II endometrial cancer: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end-results study

PURPOSE

The optimal adjuvant radiation treatment for endometrial carcinoma (EC) remains controversial. Adjuvant vaginal cuff brachytherapy (VB) has emerged as an increasingly common treatment modality. However, the time trends for using VB, external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), or combined therapy (VB+EBRT) have not been well characterized. We therefore examined the utilization trends of VB, EBRT, and VB+EBRT for adjuvant RT in International Federation of Gynecologic Oncology (FIGO) stage I and II EC over time.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We evaluated treatment patterns for 48,122 patients with EC diagnosed between January 1995 and December 2005, using the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) public use database. Chi-squared tests were used to assess differences by radiation type (VB, EBRT, and VB+EBRT) and various demographic and clinical variables.

RESULTS

Analyses were limited to 9,815 patients (20.4%) with EC who met the inclusion criteria. Among women who received adjuvant RT, the proportion receiving VB increased yearly (12.9% in 1995 compared to 32.8% in 2005 (p < 0.0001). The increasing use of VB was proportional to the decreasing use of EBRT (56.1% in 1995 to 45.8% in 2005; p < 0.0001) and VB+EBRT (31.0% in 1995 to 21.4% in 2005; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This population-based report demonstrates an increasing trend in the use of VB in the adjuvant setting after hysterectomy for treatment of women with FIGO stage I-II EC. VB alone appears to be replacing pelvic EBRT and VB+EBRT therapy in the management of stage I-II EC.

Prognostic discrimination of subgrouping node-positive endometrioid uterine cancer: location vs nodal extent

BACKGROUND

The 2009 International Federation of Gynecologists and Obstetricians elected to substage patients with positive retroperitoneal lymph nodes as IIIC 1 (pelvic lymph node metastasis only) and IIIC 2 (paraaortic node metastasis with or with positive pelvic lymph nodes). We have investigated the discriminatory ability of subgrouping patients with retroperitoneal nodal involvement based on location, number, and ratio of positive nodes.

METHODS

For 1075 patients with stage IIIC endometrioid corpus cancer abstracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results databases for 2003-2007, Kaplan-Meier analyses, Cox proportional hazard models, and other quantitative measures were used to compare the prognostic discrimination for disease-specific survival (DSS) of nodal subgroupings.

RESULTS

In univariate analysis, the 3-year DSS were significantly different for subgroupings by location (IIIC 1 vs IIIC 2; 80.5% vs 67.0%, respectively, P=0.001), lymph node ratio (≤ 23.2% vs >23.2%; 80.8% vs 67.6%; P<0.001), and number of positive lymph nodes (1, 2-5, >5; 79.5, 75.4, 62.9%, P=0.016). The ratio of positive nodes showed superior discriminatory substaging in Cox models.

CONCLUSION

Subgrouping of stage IIIC patients by the ratio of positive nodes, either as a dichotomized or continuous parameter, shows the strongest ability to discriminate the survival, controlling for other confounding factors.

The impact of surgical guidelines and periodic quality assessment on the staging of endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

To determine the impact of surgical guidelines and transparent periodic assessment of surgical quality on endometrial cancer (EC) staging by gynecologic oncologists in a single institution and to identify process-of-care, patient-specific, and disease-specific risk factors that influence surgical quality.

METHODS

In January 2004, a prospective treatment algorithm was implemented for EC at our institution. The number of nodes harvested was a surrogate, and staging quality from 2004 to 2008 (quality assessment [QA] interval) was compared with the previous 5 years (pre-QA interval). Since 2004, low-risk cases based on frozen section examination had not undergone lymphadenectomy and were excluded. Independent patient-specific, disease-specific, and surgery-related risk factors influencing lymphadenectomy quality during both intervals were identified with multivariable logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissection (LND) in surgical EC management before QA (n=420) were 77.9% and 48.8% vs 89.3% and 83.4% during the QA (n=561) (P<.001). The median number of pelvic and para-aortic nodes harvested in LND was 29 and 10 before QA vs 34 and 16 during the QA interval (P<.001). With acceptance of stringent criteria for defining systematic LND (mean node count-1 SD) during the QA, systematic pelvic (≥22 nodes) and para-aortic (≥10 nodes) LNDs occurred in 57.4% and 25.7% of cases before QA vs 77.9% and 70.7% during the QA interval (P<.001). In patients with LND, rates of systematic pelvic and para-aortic LND were 73.7% and 53.0% before vs 87.2% and 84.8% after QA (P<.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed independent factors influencing systematic pelvic and para-aortic LND (P<.01): surgeon and stage during the pre-QA interval vs surgical approach; intraoperative ascites; body mass index; surgeon; patient age; and myometrial invasion after QA implementation.

CONCLUSION

Inclusion of detailed surgical guidelines and transparent periodic assessment of surgical quality translated to dramatic improvement in quality of surgical EC staging. This implementation was associated with a transition to more patient-specific risk factors influencing systematic LND. Although surgical quality metrics were markedly enhanced during QA, persistent variability observed among surgeons and the change in surgical approach render continuous QA and improvement obligatory.

Is Lymphadenectomy Justified in Endometrial Cancer?

Endometrial cancer has in the meantime become the most frequent malignant tumor of the female genital tract. With a 5-year survival rate of 82% for all stages and more than 90% for the most common stage I, it is a carcinoma with an excellent prognosis. Against this background and in light of the results of recent studies, the value of extensive surgical staging including pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy beyond the standard therapy of hysterectomy with bilateral adnexectomy must be questioned.

To Stage or Not to Stage? That is the Question: (With Apologies to Shakespeare)

The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging rules for endometrial cancer require pelvic and para-aortic node dissection to define the extent of disease. Retrospective studies have reported improved survival in women who underwent lymphadenectomy compared with those who did not. This association may not be causally related because of bias. Recently reported prospective randomized trials of pelvic lymphadenectomy have failed to demonstrate a survival benefit. Critics of these trials remain skeptical because of perceived limitations in design, particularly the inclusion of non-high-risk women and the lack of full para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Until new trial evidence is produced to the contrary, routine lymphadenectomy cannot be recommended for endometrial cancer.

The diagnosis and treatment of endometrial cancer: progress and controversies

BACKGROUND

Endometrial carcinoma is the fourth most common type of cancer among women in Germany, with more than 11 000 newly diagnosed cases each year. The present lack of clarity about the optimal clinical management of these patients is due in part to inconsistencies in the scientific evidence and in part to recent modifications of the FIGO classification. In this article, the issues requiring clarification are presented and discussed.

METHODS

This article is based on a selective review of the pertinent literature, including evidence-based guidelines and recommendations.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Current scientific evidence does not support the screening of asymptomatic women. On the other hand, women with postmenopausal and acyclic bleeding should undergo histopathological evaluation, particularly if they have risk factors for endometrial cancer. The current FIGO classification divides endometrial cancer into stages depending on the findings at surgery. On the basis of risk stratification (e.g., by tumor stage and histological differentiation grade), women who are judged to be at high risk (FIGO Stage IB and above, Grade 3) should undergo not just hysterectomy and adnexectomy, but also systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Risk stratification also determines whether adjuvant radiotherapy should be given. The additional or alternative administration of chemotherapy is a particular consideration for women at high risk, although the pertinent clinical trials to date have yielded conflicting evidence on this point.

Is lymphadenectomy a prognostic marker in endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the human endometrium?

Background

During surgery for endometrial cancer, a pelvic lymphadenectomy with or without para-aortic lymphadenectomy is performed at least in patients with risk factors (stage I, grading 2 and/or histological subtypes with higher risk of lymphatic spread), and is hence recommended by the International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO). Although lymph node metastases are important prognostic parameters, it has been contentious whether a pelvic lymph node dissection itself has a prognostic impact in the treatment of endometrial cancer, especially in endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Therefore, this study evaluated whether lymphadenectomy has a prognostic impact in patients with endometrioid adenocarcinoma.

Methods

The benefits of lymphadenectomy were examined in 214 patients with a histological diagnosis of endometrial adenocarcinoma. Tumour characteristics were analysed with respect to the surgical and pathological stage.

Results

Of the 214 patients with endometrial adenocarcinoma, 171 (79.9%) were classified as FIGO stage I, 15 (7.0%) FIGO stage II, 21 (9.8%) FIGO stage III and 7 (3.3%) FIGO stage IV. One hundred and thirty four (62.6%) of the patients had a histological grade 1 tumour, while 56 (26.2%) and 24 (11.2%) had a histological grade 2 or grade 3 tumour, respectively. Lymphadenectomy was performed in 151 (70.6%) patients. Only 11 (5.1%) patients showed metastatic disease in the lymph nodes. The performance of a lymphadenectomy resulted in significantly increased cause-specific and overall survival, while progression-free survival was not affected by this operative procedure.

Conclusions

The performance of an operative lymphadenectomy resulted in better survival of patients with endometrioid adenocarcinoma. This increase was significant for cause-specific and overall survival, while there was a tendency only towards increased progression-free survival. Therefore, even in endometrioid adenocarcinoma, a pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy should be performed.

[Modern therapy concepts for endometrial cancer]

Most cases of endometrial cancer (EC) become symptomatic at an early stage and have a good prognosis. EC has been traditionally treated with total abdominal hysterectomy plus bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. For early stage, low grade cases (endometrioid, pT1a, pT1b; G1, G2) this is adequate therapy. For higher stages and grades, especially for type II EC (serous, clear cell) this therapy is insufficient. The efficacy of systematic pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy for high risk EC, however, remains to be evaluated. External pelvic radiotherapy has been shown to improve local control in stage I and II EC, but has no positive effect on survival. A comparable improvement of local control can be achieved by vaginal brachytherapy with significantly less toxicity. Adjuvant chemotherapy is probably efficacious in EC. Its usefulness as exclusive adjuvant therapy or in combination with brachytherapy and/or external beam therapy remains to be evaluated by prospective trials.

Node-positive adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: outcome and patterns of recurrence with and without external beam irradiation

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate treatment outcomes and patterns of recurrence in patients with node-positive (International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology stage IIIC) adenocarcinoma of the uterus without serous or clear cell differentiation.

METHODS

The records of 71 women who were treated for stage IIIC endometrial adenocarcinoma at our institution between 1984 and 2005 were reviewed. All patients underwent total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and lymphadenectomy. Fifty patients received definitive pelvic or extended-field radiotherapy with or without systemic therapy (regional RT group). Eighteen received adjuvant systemic platinum-based chemotherapy or hormonal therapy without external beam RT. The median follow-up for patients not dying of disease was 67 months. Survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method; differences were assessed using log-rank tests.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine percent (28/71) of patients had involved paraaortic lymph nodes while 61% (43/71) had only pelvic lymph nodes. Five- and 10-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rates were 63% and 54%, respectively; corresponding overall survival rates were 60% and 47%. Grade was strongly associated with DSS (76% vs 46% at 5 years for low-grade vs high-grade tumors, P=0.004). Cervical or adnexal involvement was associated with decreased DSS, but lymph-vascular space invasion, age, race, body mass index, and number and location of positive nodes were not. Five-year pelvic-relapse-free survival (98% vs 61%, P=0.001), DSS (78% vs 39%, P=0.01), and overall survival (73% vs 40%, P=0.03) were significantly better for the regional RT group than the systemic therapy group. In patients treated without regional RT, the most common site of relapse was the pelvis. DSS was not significantly correlated with number of nodes removed in the regional RT group but was in patients treated without regional RT (P=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated without regional RT had a high rate of locoregional recurrence. Patients with stage IIIC endometrial adenocarcinoma who underwent surgical staging followed by external beam irradiation had a high rate of cure. Relapses in patients treated with EBRT primarily occurred in patients with grade 3 cancer who may be most likely to benefit from combined-chemoradiation treatment.

Is lymph node count an ideal quality indicator for cancer care?

Although lymph node count has substantial appeal as a quality indicator because of the ease of measurement, the presence of variation in the population, the association with survival for many cancers, and the previous success of quality intervention programs, improvements in patient outcome by increasing lymph node counts have not yet been demonstrated. This article discusses potential pitfalls in the use of lymph node count as a quality indicator.