Short- and long-term effects on serum lipoproteins by three different techniques of apheresis

Lipoprotein turnover and possible remnant accumulation in preeclampsia: insights from the Freiburg Preeclampsia H.E.L.P.-apheresis study

Background

Preeclampsia is a life-threatening disease in pregnancy, and its complex pathomechanisms are poorly understood. In preeclampsia, lipid metabolism is substantially altered. In late onset preeclampsia, remnant removal disease like lipoprotein profiles have been observed. Lipid apheresis is currently being explored as a possible therapeutic approach to prolong preeclamptic pregnancies. Here, apheresis-induced changes in serum lipid parameters are analyzed in detail and their implications for preeclamptic lipid metabolism are discussed.

Methods

In the Freiburg H.E.L.P.-Apheresis Study, 6 early onset preeclamptic patients underwent repeated apheresis treatments. Serum lipids pre- and post-apheresis and during lipid rebound were analyzed in depth via ultracentrifugation to yield lipoprotein subclasses.

Results

The net elimination of Apolipoprotein B and plasma lipids was lower than theoretically expected. Lipids returned to previous pre-apheresis levels before the next apheresis even though apheresis was repeated within 2.9 ± 1.2 days. Apparent fractional catabolic rates and synthetic rates were substantially elevated, with fractional catabolic rates for Apolipoprotein B / LDL-cholesterol being 0.7 ± 0.3 / 0.4 ± 0.2 [day^− 1] and synthetic rates being 26 ± 8 / 17 ± 8 [mg*kg^− 1*day^− 1]. The distribution of LDL-subclasses after apheresis shifted to larger buoyant LDL, while intermediate-density lipoprotein-levels remained unaffected, supporting the notion of an underlying remnant removal disorder in preeclampsia.

Conclusion

Lipid metabolism seems to be highly accelerated in preeclampsia, likely outbalancing remnant removal mechanisms. Since cholesterol-rich lipoprotein remnants are able to accumulate in the vessel wall, remnant lipoproteins may contribute to the severe endothelial dysfunction observed in preeclampsia.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrails.gov, NCT01967355.

Lipoprotein Apheresis

Patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) have early development of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Lipid level-lowering medications are not always successful in reducing increased low-density lipoprotein C (LDL-C) levels. Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) therapy has proven its clinical benefit in reducing CVD events for patients with FH with hypercholesterolemia. LA reduces LDL-C levels by more than 60% in patients with FH and reduces CVD events. LA also reduces Lp(a) levels and CVD events. LA reduces inflammatory markers and blood viscosity.

In vivo metabolism of LDL subfractions in patients with heterozygous FH on statin therapy

LDL can be subfractionated into buoyant (1.020-1.029 g/ml(-1)), intermediate (1.030-1.040 g/ml(-1)), and dense (1.041-1.066 g/ml(-1)) LDLs. We studied the rebound of these LDL-subfractions after LDL apheresis in seven patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) regularly treated by apheresis (58 +/- 9 years, LDL-cholesterol = 342 +/- 87 mg/dl(-1), triglycerides = 109 +/- 39 mg/dl(-1)) and high-dose statins. Apolipoprotein B (apoB) concentrations were measured in LDL subfractions immediately after and on days 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 after apheresis. Compartmental models were developed to test three hypotheses: 1) that dense LDLs are derived from the delipidation of buoyant and intermediate LDLs (model A); 2) that dense LDLs are generated directly from LDL-precursors (model B); or 3) that a model combining both pathways (model C) is necessary to describe the metabolism of dense LDLs. In all models, it was assumed that apoB production and fractional catabolic rate (FCR) did not change with apheresis. Apheresis decreased buoyant, intermediate, and dense LDL-apoB by 60 +/- 12%, 67 +/- 5%, and 69 +/- 11%, respectively. Models B and C, but not model A, described the rebound data. The model with the greatest biological plausibility (model C) was used to estimate metabolic parameters. FCR was 1.05 +/- 0.86 d(-1), 0.48 +/- 0.11 d(-1), and 0.69 +/- 0.24 d(-1) for buoyant, intermediate, and dense LDLs, respectively. Dense LDL production was 17.3 +/- 0.2 mg/kg(-1)/d(-1), 58% of which was derived directly from LDL precursors (VLDL, IDL, or direct secretion), while 42% was derived from buoyant and intermediate LDLs. Thus, our data indicate that in statin-treated patients with heterozygous FH dense LDLs originate from two sources. Whether this is also valid in other metabolic situations (with predominant small, dense LDLs) remains to be determined.

Long-term reduction of C-reactive protein concentration by regular LDL apheresis

BACKGROUND

Increased C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration is an independent risk predictor for coronary heart disease (CHD). A therapeutic reduction of CRP might, therefore, reduce the risk of cardiovascular events. A single LDL apheresis lowers LDL cholesterol by 45-70%, and CRP by 20-65%, however, less is known about the long-term effects of LDL apheresis on CRP levels.

METHODS

We investigated 34 CHD patients (20 males, 14 females, 52 +/- 10 years) on statin therapy who were regularly treated by LDL apheresis because of drug-resistant hypercholesterolemia. Measurements of CRP (ultrasensitive nephelometric assay) were performed before the first apheresis, before a current apheresis (1 or 2 weeks after the last apheresis), and after a current apheresis (treatment period: 5.3 +/- 4.2 years, range: 0.25-12.5 years). LDL apheresis was performed by immunoadsorption (n = 6), dextran sulfate adsorption (n = 13), heparin-induced extracorporal LDL precipitation (HELP, n = 9), or direct adsorption of lipoproteins (DALI, n = 6).

RESULTS

CRP was significantly lower before a current apheresis (median: 0.75 mg/l, range: 0.16-4.33 mg/l) compared to before the first apheresis (median: 0.85 mg/l, range: 0.16-7.02 mg/l; P < 0.05). As expected, total and LDL cholesterol were lower before a current apheresis compared to before the initial apheresis while fibrinogen concentration did not differ significantly.

CONCLUSION

Over the period of more than 5 years LDL apheresis slightly, but significantly reduced CRP concentrations in patients with CHD on statin therapy, which may contribute to the stabilization of atherosclerosis in hypercholesterolemic patients treated with LDL apheresis. These results are even more impressive when the known age-related increase in CRP over the treatment period is taken into account.

Efficacy and Safety of a New Whole-blood Low-density Lipoprotein Apheresis System (Liposorber D) in Severe Hypercholesterolemia

Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis is an extracorporeal modality to lower LDL cholesterol. While most of the devices eliminate LDL particles from plasma, a recently introduced whole-blood perfusion column (DALI) adsorbs lipoproteins directly from whole blood. We investigated the efficacy and safety of a new whole-blood LDL apheresis system (Liposorber D) in 10 patients with severe hypercholesterolemia in a multicenter trial. In 93 LDL aphereses, the mean reduction in LDL cholesterol and lipoprotein(a) was 62.2 +/- 11.5% and 55.6 +/- 16.9%, respectively (P < 0.01). If hemodilution during apheresis was considered, the reductions were 58.0 +/- 10.9 and 55.3 +/- 10.9%, respectively (P < 0.01), while high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol did not change significantly. Three mild episodes of hypocalcemia and two mild episodes of arterial hypotension were observed; however, LDL apheresis could be continued in each case. In conclusion, the new whole-blood LDL apheresis with Liposorber D is a safe, simple, and useful modality to reduce LDL cholesterol and lipoprotein(a) in cardiovascular high-risk patients.

Lipid reductions by low-density lipoprotein apheresis: a comparison of three systems

There are currently three established low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis systems: immunoadsorption, heparin-induced extracorporeal LDL precipitation (HELP), and dextran sulfate. We treated the same patient with all three systems and compared the lipid reductions achieved. A total of 135 consecutive treatments were studied, 57 with immunoadsorption, followed by 30 with HELP and 48 with dextran sulfate adsorption. The mean plasma volume (mean +/- SD) treated was 4.9 +/- 0.05, 3.08 +/- 0.091, and 3.39 +/- 0.71 L, respectively. The LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction was 75.5% +/- 7.4%, 61.6% +/- 5.1%, and 57.1% +/- 12.4%, respectively (P < .001 for immunoadsorption vHELP and dextran sulfate). The mean removal efficiency (mass removed/plasma volume treated) for LDL-C was 1.0 +/- 0.12, 1.42 +/- 0.25, and 1.15 +/- 0.21 g/L, respectively (P < .001 for HELP v immunoadsorption and dextran sulfate). The mean LDL-C plasma concentration before apheresis was 199 +/- 23.9, 201 +/- 25.7, and 186 +/- 28 mg/dL, respectively (P < .001 for dextran sulfate adsorption v immunoadsorption and HELP). Among the three LDL apheresis systems, immunoadsorption caused the greatest percent reduction in LDL-C, while HELP eliminated LDL-C from the plasma most efficiently. Dextran sulfate was similar to HELP in terms of LDL-C reduction, and its removal efficiency was similar to immunoadsorption. Dextran sulfate was also associated with the lowest pretreatment plasma LDL-C concentration.

Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) oxidizability before and after LDL apheresis

Oxidation of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) plays a major role in the development of atherosclerosis. Hypercholesterolemia has been associated with enhanced in vitro oxidation of LDL, and lipid-lowering therapy reduces LDL oxidizability. In the present study, we investigated whether LDL apheresis performed with different techniques affects in vitro diene formation (lag phase) and modification of apolipoprotein B-100 (apoB). Baseline and posttreatment diene formation was correlated with the baseline pattern of plasma total fatty acids. We then performed a computer-simulation study to test the hypothesis that LDL apheresis-induced changes in LDL oxidizability are related to changes in the mass ratio between freshly produced and older LDL. In 19 patients aged 49+/-7 years with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) regularly treated with either immunoadsorption, heparin-induced LDL precipitation (HELP), or dextran sulfate (DS) adsorption, we determined lipoprotein levels, the lag phase, apoB modification, and the fatty acid pattern in plasma samples drawn at the onset and termination of one LDL apheresis. LDL apheresis significantly decreased total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglycerides by 50.4%, 14.9%, 62.6%, and 33.6%, respectively. The lag phase increased by a significant mean of 9.8%; the charge of apoB was not altered. The lag phase before treatment positively correlated with the baseline concentration of plasma total palmitic, myristic, and oleic acid. The increase in the lag phase during treatment correlated with a high pretreatment concentration of lauric, linoleic, and docosahexanoic acid. The simulation study indicates that a temporary imbalance between two LDL compartments, one representing freshly secreted LDL and the other representing older LDL, could explain the observed increase in the lag phase after LDL apheresis. In conclusion, in patients with heterozygous FH, LDL apheresis performed with different techniques decreases the susceptibility of LDL to oxidation. This decrease may be related to a temporary mass imbalance between freshly produced and older LDL particles. Furthermore, the baseline fatty acid pattern influences pretreatment and posttreatment susceptibility to oxidation.