Albumin Dialysis in Critically Ill Patients: Use Versus Omission of Intradialytic Heparin

Effectiveness and Safety Assessment of Citrate Anticoagulation During Albumin Dialysis in Comparison to Other Methods of Anticoagulation

Liver failure is a serious and often deadly disease often requiring MARS (Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System) therapy. Choosing the safe and effective method of anticoagulation during artificial liver support systems seems to be very difficult and extremely important. The aim of this study was to assess effectiveness and safety of regional anticoagulation with citrate in liver failure patients during MARS. We used a single center observational study. We analyzed 158 MARS sessions performed in 65 patients: 105 (66.5%) sessions in 41 patients with heparin anticoagulation, 40 (25.3%) sessions in 19 patients with citrate, and 13 (8%) sessions in only five patients without anticoagulation, that were excluded from part of the analysis. To determine the effectiveness of regional anticoagulation with citrate, probability of filter survival and changes in laboratory parameters were analyzed according to the applied method of anticoagulation. The safety of citrate was determined by Ca/Ca²⁺ ratio, acid-base balance, bleeding complications, and the need for blood product transfusions. The probability of filter survival in the citrate group was 94% and in the heparin group 82% (P = 0.204). There was no relationship between the method of anticoagulation and effectiveness of MARS therapy in lowering the levels of the analyzed parameters. Only one patient had a Ca/Ca²⁺ ratio higher than he safety margin. There were no statistically significant changes in pH and lactate level irrespective of anticoagulation; bicarbonate dropped significantly only in the heparin group (P = 0.03). The frequency of bleeding complications and the need for transfusions did not differ significantly between groups. Regional anticoagulation with citrate can be an effective and safe method of anticoagulation during MARS therapy, but requires attentive monitoring and further studies in liver failure patients.

No sustained impact of intermittent extracorporeal liver support on thrombocyte time course in a randomized controlled albumin dialysis trial

Reduction of platelets is a common finding in patients with liver disease and can be aggravated by extracorporeal therapies, e.g. artificial liver support. The impact of extracorporeal albumin dialysis on the time count and time course of platelets in liver failure patients was evaluated in a randomized controlled clinical trial. Mean thrombocyte reduction during a single extracorporeal liver support therapy was -15.1% [95%CI: -17.7; -12.5]. No differences were found between treatments of patients with a more reduced platelet count (<100 GPT/L: -15.6% [-19.5; -11.7%]; n = 43) compared to patients with normal or slightly decreased thrombocytes (-14.6% [-18.3%; -11.0%]; n = 43; P = 0.719). The variation of platelet count within 24 h after onset of extracorporeal therapy treatment was less, albeit significant (-3.5% [-6.3%; -0.7%], P < 0.016). Absolute thrombocyte variability was comparable between both groups (with extracorporeal therapy -5.6 GPT/L [-9.7; -1.4], without extracorporeal therapy -1.3 GPT/L [-7.3; 4.7]; P = 0.243), whereas relative decrease of thrombocytes within a 24-h period of extracorporeal therapy was greater than the changes in patients without extracorporeal therapy (-3.5% [-6.3%; -0.7%] vs. 2.0% [-2.0%; 5.9%]; P = 0.026]. Within a period of two weeks after enrollment, no significant differences of platelet count were observed either between the two groups or in the time course (P(group) = 0.337, P(time) = 0.277). Reduction of platelets during intermittent extracorporeal liver support was less pronounced within a 24-h period as before and after a single treatment and was comparable to variations in the control group without extracorporeal therapy.

A prospective randomized open-label crossover trial of regional citrate anticoagulation vs. anticoagulation free liver dialysis by the Molecular Adsorbents Recirculating System

Introduction

The Molecular Adsorbent Recycling System (MARS) is used to treat patients with liver failure. Observational data suggest that citrate anticoagulation during MARS is feasible. Comparative studies on the optimal anticoagulation regimen during MARS are lacking. The aim of the current study was to evaluate two heparin-free anticoagulation regimens.

Methods

We performed a prospective randomized open-label crossover study of regional citrate anticoagulation against no anticoagulation. Ten patients (age 55 ± 11 years) with liver failure undergoing MARS treatment were included. The primary endpoint was completion of MARS sessions. Secondary endpoints included treatment efficacy and safety. Longevity of MARS treatment was plotted as a Kaplan-Meier estimate. Fisher's exact test was used for contingency table analysis.

Results

Of a total of 27 6-hour sessions, four sessions had to be terminated prematurely, three due to occlusive clotting of the extracorporeal circuit and one due to uncontrollable bleeding from the vascular access site. All four events occurred in the group without anticoagulation. Between group comparison demonstrated citrate anticoagulation to significantly increase the likelihood of completed MARS treatment (Fisher's exact test, P 0.04). This translates into higher bilirubin reduction ratios when citrate was applied (reduction ratio 0.25 vs. 0.15, P 0.02). Systemic ionized calcium concentrations were significantly reduced during citrate anticoagulation (P < 0.001) but remained within a safe range. We observed no major adverse events.

Conclusions

Regional citrate anticoagulation in patients with liver failure is feasible. Citrate anticoagulation provides superior patency of the extracorporeal circuit. Avoidance of anticoagulation during MARS results in significant loss of treatment efficacy, due to treatment downtime. Additional studies are required to identify the optimal anticoagulation regimen for extracorporeal circulation in patients with liver failure.

Use of the molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS™) for the management of acute poisoning with or without liver failure

INTRODUCTION

There is an increasing interest in recent developments in bioartificial and non-bioartificial devices, so called extracorporeal liver assist devices, which are now used widely not only to increase drug elimination, but also to enhance the removal of endogenous substances in acute liver failure. Most of the non-bioartificial techniques are based on the principle of albumin dialysis. The objective is to remove albumin-bound substances that could play a role in the pathophysiology of acute liver failure by dialysing blood against an albumin-containing solution across a high flux permeable membrane. The most widely used device is the Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System (MARS™).

METHODS

The relevant English and French literature was identified through Medline using the terms, 'molecular adsorbent recirculating system', 'MARS', 'acute liver failure', 'acute poisoning', 'intoxication'. This search identified 139 papers of which 48 reported on a toxic cause for the use of MARS™. Of these 48 papers, 39 specified the substance (eighteen different substances were identified); two papers reported on the same group of patients. BIOARTIFICIAL AND NON-BIOARTIFICIAL SYSTEMS: Bioartificial systems based on porcine hepatocytes incorporated in the extracorporeal circuit are no longer in use due to the possibility of porcine retroviral transmission to humans. Historically, experience with such devices was limited to a few cases of paracetamol poisoning. In contrast, an abundant literature exists for the non-bioartificial systems based on albumin dialysis. The MARS™ has been used more widely than other techniques, such as the one using fractionated plasma separation and adsorption (Prometheus™). All the extracorporeal liver assist devices are able to some extent to remove biological substances (ammonia, urea, creatinine, bilirubin, bile acids, amino acids, cytokines, vasoactive agents) but the real impact on the patient's clinical course has still to be determined. Improvement in cardiovascular or neurological dysfunction has been shown both in acute liver failure and acute-on-chronic liver failure but no impact on mortality has been reported. ACUTE POISONING WITH LIVER FAILURE: Randomized controlled trials are very limited in number and patients poisoned by paracetamol or Amanita phalloides are usually included for outcome analysis in larger groups of acute liver failure patients. Initial results look promising but should be confirmed. Beyond its effect in liver failure, MARS™ could also enhance the elimination of the drug or toxin responsible for the failure, as is described with paracetamol. ACUTE POISONING WITHOUT LIVER FAILURE: Extracorporeal liver assist devices have also been used to promote elimination of drugs that are highly protein bound. Data in various case reports confirm a high elimination of phenytoin, theophylline and diltiazem. However, definite conclusions on the toxicokinetic or clinical efficacy cannot be drawn.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the lack of large multicentre randomized trials on the use of MARS™ in patients with acute liver failure, the literature shows clinical and biological benefit from this technique. In drug or toxin-induced acute liver failure, such as paracetamol or mushroom poisoning, MARS™ has been used extensively, confirming in a non-randomized fashion, the positive effect observed in the larger population of acute liver failure patients. Furthermore, as MARS™ has been shown in experimental studies to remove protein-bound substances, it is potentially a promising treatment for patients with acute poisoning from drugs that have high protein-binding capacity and are metabolized by the liver, especially, if they develop liver failure concomitantly.

Albumin dialysis without anticoagulation in high-risk patients: an observational study

Severe liver failure causes coagulopathy and high bleeding risk. Albumin dialysis with Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System (MARS) (Gambro, Lund, Sweden) is useful for treatment. However, anticoagulation during its use is of uncertain value. We omitted heparin-saline priming and intradialytic heparin and examined its effects. Albumin dialysis was performed in critically ill patients with intermittent circuit saline flushes (2664 ± 2420 mL per treatment). A total of 12 patients (M : F = 10:2; age 49 ± 9 years) were thus treated: 6 for fulminant hepatic failure and 6 for acute-on-chronic liver failure. The overall hospitalization duration was 31 ± 30 days. A total of 44 treatment sessions were performed (average 8 ± 7 sessions per patient). Prescribed versus achieved MARS duration were 13 ± 3 versus 11 ± 4 h, P < 0.05. Twenty-three percent (10/44) of MARS sessions clotted, 11% (5/44) of treatments were electively terminated, and 2% (1/44) developed vascular catheter occlusion. Spontaneous bleeding occurred in 9% (4/44). Pre- versus post-MARS systemic and blood circuit transmembrane pressures (mm Hg), and albumin dialysate afferent and efferent pressures were all stable. Coagulation indices were (pre- vs. post-MARS): (i) prothrombin time (seconds): 36 ± 30 versus 42 ± 33, P = 0.143; (ii) activated partial thromboplastin time (seconds): 78 ± 43 versus 88 ± 45, P = 0.117; and (iii) platelet count (×10(3) /µL): 87 ± 40 versus 76 ± 48, P = 0.004. Systemic blood solute concentrations pre- versus post-MARS were: (i) serum urea (mg/dL): 22.4 ± 19.6 versus 14.0 ± 8.4, P < 0.05; (ii) serum creatinine (mg/dL): 2.8 ± 2.3 versus 1.9 ± 1.5, P < 0.05; (iii) total bilirubin (mg/dL): 29.5 ± 8.8 versus 20.5 ± 5.1, P < 0.05; and (iv) plasma ammonia (µg/dL): 186 ± 85 versus 129 ± 66, P < 0.05. Anticoagulant-free albumin dialysis remained effective despite frequent circuit clotting. This led to significant exacerbation of thrombocytopenia although bleeding risk remained low.

Liver transplantation avoided in patients with fulminant hepatic failure who received albumin dialysis with the molecular adsorbent recirculating system while on the waiting list: impact of the duration of therapy

Eighteen patients with fulminant hepatic failure due to various medical causes were listed for emergency liver transplantation and treated with extracorporeal albumin dialysis sessions using the molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) at our center over a 74-month period. Due to improvement of liver function, transplantation could be avoided in 9 patients (50%, 95% confidence interval 29% to 71%) who fully recovered afterwards. This improvement rate was higher than the rate of improvement in the French cohort of fulminant hepatic failure patients with similar etiologies (19.3%, 95% confidence interval 14.9% to 24.6%, P = 0.002). In our 18 patients, there were no statistically significant differences in any baseline characteristics or in the time with liver failure meeting transplant criteria between the patients who improved while waiting and those who did not. However, the patients who improved received a greater number of sessions and a longer total duration of MARS therapy (all P < 0.001). In the whole study population, a MARS therapy duration > or =15 h was significantly associated with improvement of liver function without transplantation (adjusted adds ratio [OR] 65.76, 2.48-1743.11, P = 0.01). Tolerance of therapy was acceptable. These results suggest that MARS therapy could contribute to native liver recovery and is safe in patients on the waiting list for fulminant hepatic failure. A minimum duration of therapy (> or =15 h) could be necessary to expect significant liver function improvement.