1
|
Myers P, Gunnarsdottir KM, Li A, Razskazovskiy V, Craley J, Chandler A, Wyeth D, Wyeth E, Zaghloul KA, Inati SK, Hopp JL, Haridas B, Gonzalez‐Martinez J, Bagíc A, Kang J, Sperling MR, Barot N, Sarma SV, Husari KS. Diagnosing Epilepsy with Normal Interictal EEG Using Dynamic Network Models. Ann Neurol 2025; 97:907-918. [PMID: 39817338 PMCID: PMC12010061 DOI: 10.1002/ana.27168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Revised: 12/05/2024] [Accepted: 12/09/2024] [Indexed: 01/18/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Whereas a scalp electroencephalogram (EEG) is important for diagnosing epilepsy, a single routine EEG is limited in its diagnostic value. Only a small percentage of routine EEGs show interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) and overall misdiagnosis rates of epilepsy are 20% to 30%. We aim to demonstrate how network properties in EEG recordings can be used to improve the speed and accuracy differentiating epilepsy from mimics, such as functional seizures - even in the absence of IEDs. METHODS In this multicenter study, we analyzed routine scalp EEGs from 218 patients with suspected epilepsy and normal initial EEGs. The patients' diagnoses were later confirmed based on an epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) admission. About 46% ultimately being diagnosed with epilepsy and 54% with non-epileptic conditions. A logistic regression model was trained using spectral and network-derived EEG features to differentiate between epilepsy and non-epilepsy. Of the 218 patients, 90% were used for training and 10% were held out for testing. Within the training set, 10-fold cross validation was performed. The resulting tool was named "EpiScalp." RESULTS EpiScalp achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.940, an accuracy of 0.904, a sensitivity of 0.835, and a specificity of 0.963 in classifying patients as having epilepsy or not. INTERPRETATION EpiScalp provides an accurate diagnostic aid from a single initial EEG recording, even in more challenging epilepsy cases with normal initial EEGs. This may represent a paradigm shift in epilepsy diagnosis by deriving an objective measure of epilepsy likelihood from previously uninformative EEGs. ANN NEUROL 2025;97:907-918.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Myers
- Department of Biomedical EngineeringJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMDUSA
- Institute for Computational MedicineJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - Kristin M. Gunnarsdottir
- Department of Biomedical EngineeringJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMDUSA
- Institute for Computational MedicineJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - Adam Li
- Department of Biomedical EngineeringJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMDUSA
- Institute for Computational MedicineJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - Vlad Razskazovskiy
- Neurosurgery and Epilepsy CenterUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical CenterPittsburghPAUSA
| | - Jeff Craley
- Department of Biomedical EngineeringJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMDUSA
- Institute for Computational MedicineJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - Alana Chandler
- Department of Biomedical EngineeringJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMDUSA
- Institute for Computational MedicineJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - Dale Wyeth
- Division of EpilepsyThomas Jefferson University HospitalPhiladelphiaPAUSA
| | - Edmund Wyeth
- Division of EpilepsyThomas Jefferson University HospitalPhiladelphiaPAUSA
| | - Kareem A. Zaghloul
- Surgical Neurology BranchNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of HealthBethesdaMDUSA
| | - Sara K. Inati
- Surgical Neurology BranchNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of HealthBethesdaMDUSA
| | - Jennifer L. Hopp
- Department of NeurologyUniversity of Maryland Medical CenterBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - Babitha Haridas
- Department of Neurology, Comprehensive Epilepsy CenterJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMDUSA
| | | | - Anto Bagíc
- Neurosurgery and Epilepsy CenterUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical CenterPittsburghPAUSA
| | - Joon‐yi Kang
- Department of Neurology, Comprehensive Epilepsy CenterJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMDUSA
| | | | - Niravkumar Barot
- Department of NeurologyBeth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterBostonMAUSA
| | - Sridevi V. Sarma
- Department of Biomedical EngineeringJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMDUSA
- Institute for Computational MedicineJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - Khalil S. Husari
- Department of Neurology, Comprehensive Epilepsy CenterJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMDUSA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kerr WT, McFarlane KN, Figueiredo Pucci G. The present and future of seizure detection, prediction, and forecasting with machine learning, including the future impact on clinical trials. Front Neurol 2024; 15:1425490. [PMID: 39055320 PMCID: PMC11269262 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1425490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2024] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Seizures have a profound impact on quality of life and mortality, in part because they can be challenging both to detect and forecast. Seizure detection relies upon accurately differentiating transient neurological symptoms caused by abnormal epileptiform activity from similar symptoms with different causes. Seizure forecasting aims to identify when a person has a high or low likelihood of seizure, which is related to seizure prediction. Machine learning and artificial intelligence are data-driven techniques integrated with neurodiagnostic monitoring technologies that attempt to accomplish both of those tasks. In this narrative review, we describe both the existing software and hardware approaches for seizure detection and forecasting, as well as the concepts for how to evaluate the performance of new technologies for future application in clinical practice. These technologies include long-term monitoring both with and without electroencephalography (EEG) that report very high sensitivity as well as reduced false positive detections. In addition, we describe the implications of seizure detection and forecasting upon the evaluation of novel treatments for seizures within clinical trials. Based on these existing data, long-term seizure detection and forecasting with machine learning and artificial intelligence could fundamentally change the clinical care of people with seizures, but there are multiple validation steps necessary to rigorously demonstrate their benefits and costs, relative to the current standard.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wesley T. Kerr
- Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kerr WT, McFarlane KN. Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Applications to Epilepsy: a Review for the Practicing Epileptologist. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2023; 23:869-879. [PMID: 38060133 DOI: 10.1007/s11910-023-01318-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Machine Learning (ML) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) are data-driven techniques to translate raw data into applicable and interpretable insights that can assist in clinical decision making. Some of these tools have extremely promising initial results, earning both great excitement and creating hype. This non-technical article reviews recent developments in ML/AI in epilepsy to assist the current practicing epileptologist in understanding both the benefits and limitations of integrating ML/AI tools into their clinical practice. RECENT FINDINGS ML/AI tools have been developed to assist clinicians in almost every clinical decision including (1) predicting future epilepsy in people at risk, (2) detecting and monitoring for seizures, (3) differentiating epilepsy from mimics, (4) using data to improve neuroanatomic localization and lateralization, and (5) tracking and predicting response to medical and surgical treatments. We also discuss practical, ethical, and equity considerations in the development and application of ML/AI tools including chatbots based on Large Language Models (e.g., ChatGPT). ML/AI tools will change how clinical medicine is practiced, but, with rare exceptions, the transferability to other centers, effectiveness, and safety of these approaches have not yet been established rigorously. In the future, ML/AI will not replace epileptologists, but epileptologists with ML/AI will replace epileptologists without ML/AI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wesley T Kerr
- Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, 3471 Fifth Ave, Kaufmann 811.22, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, 3471 Fifth Ave, Kaufmann 811.22, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
- Department of Neurology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| | - Katherine N McFarlane
- Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, 3471 Fifth Ave, Kaufmann 811.22, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Can Presurgical Interhemispheric EEG Connectivity Predict Outcome in Hemispheric Surgery? A Brain Machine Learning Approach. Brain Sci 2022; 13:brainsci13010071. [PMID: 36672052 PMCID: PMC9856795 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13010071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2022] [Revised: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Hemispherotomy (HT) is a surgical option for treatment of drug-resistant seizures due to hemispheric structural lesions. Factors affecting seizure outcome have not been fully clarified. In our study, we used a brain Machine Learning (ML) approach to evaluate the possible role of Inter-hemispheric EEG Connectivity (IC) in predicting post-surgical seizure outcome. METHODS We collected 21 pediatric patients with drug-resistant epilepsy; who underwent HT in our center from 2009 to 2020; with a follow-up of at least two years. We selected 5-s windows of wakefulness and sleep pre-surgical EEG and we trained Artificial Neuronal Network (ANN) to estimate epilepsy outcome. We extracted EEG features as input data and selected the ANN with best accuracy. RESULTS Among 21 patients, 15 (71%) were seizure and drug-free at last follow-up. ANN showed 73.3% of accuracy, with 85% of seizure free and 40% of non-seizure free patients appropriately classified. CONCLUSIONS The accuracy level that we reached supports the hypothesis that pre-surgical EEG features may have the potential to predict epilepsy outcome after HT. SIGNIFICANCE The role of pre-surgical EEG data in influencing seizure outcome after HT is still debated. We proposed a computational predictive model, with an ML approach, with a high accuracy level.
Collapse
|
5
|
Kerr WT, Tatekawa H, Lee JK, Karimi AH, Sreenivasan SS, O'Neill J, Smith JM, Hickman LB, Savic I, Nasrullah N, Espinoza R, Narr K, Salamon N, Beimer NJ, Hadjiiski LM, Eliashiv DS, Stacey WC, Engel J, Feusner JD, Stern JM. Clinical MRI morphological analysis of functional seizures compared to seizure-naïve and psychiatric controls. Epilepsy Behav 2022; 134:108858. [PMID: 35933959 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2022.108858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Revised: 06/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Functional seizures (FS), also known as psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES), are physical manifestations of acute or chronic psychological distress. Functional and structural neuroimaging have identified objective signs of this disorder. We evaluated whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) morphometry differed between patients with FS and clinically relevant comparison populations. METHODS Quality-screened clinical-grade MRIs were acquired from 666 patients from 2006 to 2020. Morphometric features were quantified with FreeSurfer v6. Mixed-effects linear regression compared the volume, thickness, and surface area within 201 regions-of-interest for 90 patients with FS, compared to seizure-naïve patients with depression (n = 243), anxiety (n = 68), and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD, n = 41), respectively, and to other seizure-naïve controls with similar quality MRIs, accounting for the influence of multiple confounds including depression and anxiety based on chart review. These comparison populations were obtained through review of clinical records plus research studies obtained on similar scanners. RESULTS After Bonferroni-Holm correction, patients with FS compared with seizure-naïve controls exhibited thinner bilateral superior temporal cortex (left 0.053 mm, p = 0.014; right 0.071 mm, p = 0.00006), thicker left lateral occipital cortex (0.052 mm, p = 0.0035), and greater left cerebellar white-matter volume (1085 mm3, p = 0.0065). These findings were not accounted for by lower MRI quality in patients with FS. CONCLUSIONS These results reinforce prior indications of structural neuroimaging correlates of FS and, in particular, distinguish brain morphology in FS from that in depression, anxiety, and OCD. Future work may entail comparisons with other psychiatric disorders including bipolar and schizophrenia, as well as exploration of brain structural heterogeneity within FS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wesley T Kerr
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Neurology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Hiroyuki Tatekawa
- Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - John K Lee
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Amir H Karimi
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Siddhika S Sreenivasan
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Joseph O'Neill
- Division of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Jane & Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Brain Research Institute, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jena M Smith
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - L Brian Hickman
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ivanka Savic
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institute and Neurology Clinic, Karolinksa University Hospital, Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Nilab Nasrullah
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institute and Neurology Clinic, Karolinksa University Hospital, Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Randall Espinoza
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Katherine Narr
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Noriko Salamon
- Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Nicholas J Beimer
- Department of Neurology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Lubomir M Hadjiiski
- Department of Radiology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Dawn S Eliashiv
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - William C Stacey
- Department of Neurology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jerome Engel
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Brain Research Institute, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jamie D Feusner
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - John M Stern
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fujita Y, Yanagisawa T, Fukuma R, Ura N, Oshino S, Kishima H. Abnormal phase-amplitude coupling characterizes the interictal state in epilepsy. J Neural Eng 2022; 19. [PMID: 35385832 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac64c4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Diagnosing epilepsy still requires visual interpretation of electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography (MEG) by specialists, which prevents quantification and standardization of diagnosis. Previous studies proposed automated diagnosis by combining various features from electroencephalography and MEG, such as relative power (Power) and functional connectivity. However, the usefulness of interictal phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) in diagnosing epilepsy is still unknown. We hypothesized that resting-state PAC would be different for patients with epilepsy in the interictal state and for healthy participants such that it would improve discrimination between the groups. METHODS We obtained resting-state MEG and magnetic resonance imaging in 90 patients with epilepsy during their preoperative evaluation and in 90 healthy participants. We used the cortical currents estimated from MEG and magnetic resonance imaging to calculate Power in the δ (1-3 Hz), θ (4-7 Hz), α (8-13 Hz), β (13-30 Hz), low γ (35-55 Hz), and high γ (65-90 Hz) bands and functional connectivity in the θ band. PAC was evaluated using the synchronization index (SI) for eight frequency band pairs: the phases of δ, θ, α, and β and the amplitudes of low and high γ. First, we compared the mean SI values for the patients with epilepsy and the healthy participants. Then, using features such as PAC, Power, functional connectivity, and features extracted by deep learning individually or combined, we tested whether PAC improves discrimination accuracy for the two groups. RESULTS The mean SI values were significantly different for the patients with epilepsy and the healthy participants. The SI value difference was highest for θ/low γ in the temporal lobe. Discrimination accuracy was the highest, at 90%, using the combination of PAC and deep learning. SIGNIFICANCE Abnormal PAC characterized the patients with epilepsy in the interictal state compared with the healthy participants, potentially improving the discrimination of epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuya Fujita
- Institute for Advanced co-creation studies, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka Suita Osaka Japan, Suita, 565-0871, JAPAN
| | - Takufumi Yanagisawa
- Institute for Advanced co-creation studies, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka Suita Osaka Japan, Suita, 565-0871, JAPAN
| | - Ryohei Fukuma
- Institute for Advanced co-creation studies, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka Suita Osaka Japan, Suita, 565-0871, JAPAN
| | - Natsuko Ura
- Institute for Advanced co-creation studies, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka Suita Osaka Japan, Suita, 565-0871, JAPAN
| | - Satoru Oshino
- Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka University Faculty of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, suita, Osaka, Japan, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Dept of Neurosurgery, Osaka, Osaka, 5670871, JAPAN
| | - Haruhiko Kishima
- Department of neurosurgery, Osaka University, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Suita, Osaka, 5650871, JAPAN
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tong X, Wang J, Qin L, Zhou J, Guan Y, Zhai F, Teng P, Wang M, Li T, Wang X, Luan G. Analysis of power spectrum and phase lag index changes following deep brain stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy: A retrospective study. Seizure 2022; 96:6-12. [PMID: 35042005 DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2022.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Revised: 12/18/2021] [Accepted: 01/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The mechanisms underlying the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT) deep brain stimulation (DBS) for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) have not been fully explored. The present study aimed to measure the changes in whole-brain activity generated by ANT DBS using interictal electroencephalography (EEG). MATERIALS AND METHODS Interictal EEG signals were retrospectively collected in 20 DRE patients who underwent ANT DBS surgery. Patients were classified as responders or non-responders depending on their response to ANT DBS treatment. The power spectrum (PS) and Phase Lag Index (PLI) were determined and data analyzed using a paired sample t-test to evaluate activity differences between pre-and-post-treatment on different frequency categories. Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney test (non-parametric test) and Fisher exact test were used to compare groups in terms of clinical variables and EEG metrics. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant, and FDR-corrected values were used for multiple testing. RESULTS PS analysis revealed that whole-brain spectral power had a significant decrease in the beta (p = 0.005) and gamma (p = 0.037) bands following ANT DBS treatment in responders. The analysis of scalp topographic images of all patients showed that ANT DBS decreases PS in the beta band at the F3, F7 and Cz electrode sites. The findings indicated a decrease in PS in the gamma band at the Fp2, F3, Cz, T3, T5 and Oz electrode sites. After ANT DBS treatment, PLI analysis showed a significant decrease in PLI between Fp1 and T3 in the gamma band in responders. CONCLUSION The findings showed that ANT DBS induces a decrease in power in the left frontal lobe, left temporal lobe and midline areas in the beta and gamma bands. Lower whole-brain power in the beta and gamma bands can be used as biomarkers for a favorable therapeutic response to ANT DBS, and decreased synchronization between the left frontal pole and temporal lobe in the gamma band can also be used as a biomarker for effective clinical stimulation to guide postoperative programming.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuezhi Tong
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100093, China
| | - Jing Wang
- Department of Neurology, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100093, China
| | - Lang Qin
- McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Peking University, Beijing 100093, China; Center for MRI Research, Peking University, Beijing 100093, China
| | - Jian Zhou
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100093, China
| | - Yuguang Guan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100093, China
| | - Feng Zhai
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100093, China
| | - Pengfei Teng
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100093, China
| | - Mengyang Wang
- Department of Neurology, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100093, China
| | - Tianfu Li
- Department of Neurology, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100093, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Epilepsy, Beijing 100093, China
| | - Xiongfei Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100093, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Epilepsy, Beijing 100093, China; Epilepsy Institute, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing 100093, China
| | - Guoming Luan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100093, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Epilepsy, Beijing 100093, China; Epilepsy Institute, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing 100093, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Saeidi M, Karwowski W, Farahani FV, Fiok K, Taiar R, Hancock PA, Al-Juaid A. Neural Decoding of EEG Signals with Machine Learning: A Systematic Review. Brain Sci 2021; 11:1525. [PMID: 34827524 PMCID: PMC8615531 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11111525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Revised: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Electroencephalography (EEG) is a non-invasive technique used to record the brain's evoked and induced electrical activity from the scalp. Artificial intelligence, particularly machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) algorithms, are increasingly being applied to EEG data for pattern analysis, group membership classification, and brain-computer interface purposes. This study aimed to systematically review recent advances in ML and DL supervised models for decoding and classifying EEG signals. Moreover, this article provides a comprehensive review of the state-of-the-art techniques used for EEG signal preprocessing and feature extraction. To this end, several academic databases were searched to explore relevant studies from the year 2000 to the present. Our results showed that the application of ML and DL in both mental workload and motor imagery tasks has received substantial attention in recent years. A total of 75% of DL studies applied convolutional neural networks with various learning algorithms, and 36% of ML studies achieved competitive accuracy by using a support vector machine algorithm. Wavelet transform was found to be the most common feature extraction method used for all types of tasks. We further examined the specific feature extraction methods and end classifier recommendations discovered in this systematic review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maham Saeidi
- Computational Neuroergonomics Laboratory, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Systems, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA; (F.V.F.); (K.F.)
| | - Waldemar Karwowski
- Computational Neuroergonomics Laboratory, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Systems, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA; (F.V.F.); (K.F.)
| | - Farzad V. Farahani
- Computational Neuroergonomics Laboratory, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Systems, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA; (F.V.F.); (K.F.)
- Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
| | - Krzysztof Fiok
- Computational Neuroergonomics Laboratory, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Systems, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA; (F.V.F.); (K.F.)
| | - Redha Taiar
- MATIM, Moulin de la Housse, Université de Reims Champagne Ardenne, CEDEX 02, 51687 Reims, France;
| | - P. A. Hancock
- Department of Psychology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA;
| | - Awad Al-Juaid
- Industrial Engineering Department, Taif University, Taif 26571, Saudi Arabia;
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kerr WT, Lee JK, Karimi AH, Tatekawa H, Hickman LB, Connerney M, Sreenivasan SS, Dubey I, Allas CH, Smith JM, Savic I, Silverman DHS, Hadjiiski LM, Beimer NJ, Stacey WC, Cohen MS, Engel J, Feusner JD, Salamon N, Stern JM. A minority of patients with functional seizures have abnormalities on neuroimaging. J Neurol Sci 2021; 427:117548. [PMID: 34216975 DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2021.117548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Revised: 06/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Functional seizures often are managed incorrectly as a diagnosis of exclusion. However, a significant minority of patients with functional seizures may have abnormalities on neuroimaging that typically are associated with epilepsy, leading to diagnostic confusion. We evaluated the rate of epilepsy-associated findings on MRI, FDG-PET, and CT in patients with functional seizures. METHODS We studied radiologists' reports from neuroimages at our comprehensive epilepsy center from a consecutive series of patients diagnosed with functional seizures without comorbid epilepsy from 2006 to 2019. We summarized the MRI, FDG-PET, and CT results as follows: within normal limits, incidental findings, unrelated findings, non-specific abnormalities, post-operative study, epilepsy risk factors (ERF), borderline epilepsy-associated findings (EAF), and definitive EAF. RESULTS Of the 256 MRIs, 23% demonstrated ERF (5%), borderline EAF (8%), or definitive EAF (10%). The most common EAF was hippocampal sclerosis, with the majority of borderline EAF comprising hippocampal atrophy without T2 hyperintensity or vice versa. Of the 87 FDG-PETs, 26% demonstrated borderline EAF (17%) or definitive EAF (8%). Epilepsy-associated findings primarily included focal hypometabolism, especially of the temporal lobes, with borderline findings including subtle or questionable hypometabolism. Of the 51 CTs, only 2% had definitive EAF. SIGNIFICANCE This large case series provides further evidence that, while uncommon, EAF are seen in patients with functional seizures. A significant portion of these abnormal findings are borderline. The moderately high rate of these abnormalities may represent framing bias from the indication of the study being "seizures," the relative subtlety of EAF, or effects of antiseizure medications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wesley T Kerr
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - John K Lee
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Amir H Karimi
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Hiroyuki Tatekawa
- Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - L Brian Hickman
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Michael Connerney
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Ishita Dubey
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Corinne H Allas
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jena M Smith
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ivanka Savic
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institute and Neurology Clinic, Karolinksa University Hospital, Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Daniel H S Silverman
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lubomir M Hadjiiski
- Department of Radiology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Nicholas J Beimer
- Department of Neurology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - William C Stacey
- Department of Neurology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Mark S Cohen
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Departments of Bioengineering, Psychology and Biomedical Physics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jerome Engel
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Brain Research Institute, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jamie D Feusner
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institute and Neurology Clinic, Karolinksa University Hospital, Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Noriko Salamon
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - John M Stern
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kerr WT, Zhang X, Hill CE, Janio EA, Chau AM, Braesch CT, Le JM, Hori JM, Patel AB, Allas CH, Karimi AH, Dubey I, Sreenivasan SS, Gallardo NL, Bauirjan J, Hwang ES, Davis EC, D'Ambrosio SR, Al Banna M, Cho AY, Dewar SR, Engel J, Feusner JD, Stern JM. Epilepsy, dissociative seizures, and mixed: Associations with time to video-EEG. Seizure 2021; 86:116-122. [PMID: 33601302 PMCID: PMC7979505 DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2021.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 01/23/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Video-electroencephalographic monitoring (VEM) is a core component to the diagnosis and evaluation of epilepsy and dissociative seizures (DS)-also known as functional or psychogenic seizures-but VEM evaluation often occurs later than recommended. To understand why delays occur, we compared how patient-reported clinical factors were associated with time from first seizure to VEM (TVEM) in patients with epilepsy, DS or mixed. METHODS We acquired data from 1245 consecutive patients with epilepsy, VEM-documented DS or mixed epilepsy and DS. We used multivariate log-normal regression with recursive feature elimination (RFE) to evaluate which of 76 clinical factors interacting with patients' diagnoses were associated with TVEM. RESULTS The mean and median TVEM were 14.6 years and 10 years, respectively (IQR 3-23 years). In the multivariate RFE model, the factors associated with longer TVEM in all patients included unemployment and not student status, more antiseizure medications (current and past), concussion, and ictal behavior suggestive of temporal lobe epilepsy. Average TVEM was shorter for DS than epilepsy, particularly for patients with depression, anxiety, migraines, and eye closure. Average TVEM was longer specifically for patients with DS taking more medications, more seizure types, non-metastatic cancer, and with other psychiatric comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS In all patients with seizures, trials of numerous antiseizure medications, unemployment and non-student status was associated with longer TVEM. These associations highlight a disconnect between International League Against Epilepsy practice parameters and observed referral patterns in epilepsy. In patients with dissociative seizures, some but not all factors classically associated with DS reduced TVEM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wesley T Kerr
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
| | - Xingruo Zhang
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Chloe E Hill
- Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Emily A Janio
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Andrea M Chau
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Chelsea T Braesch
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Justine M Le
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Jessica M Hori
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Akash B Patel
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Corinne H Allas
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Amir H Karimi
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Ishita Dubey
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Siddhika S Sreenivasan
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Norma L Gallardo
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Janar Bauirjan
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Eric S Hwang
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Emily C Davis
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Shannon R D'Ambrosio
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Mona Al Banna
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Andrew Y Cho
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Sandra R Dewar
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Jerome Engel
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Department of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Brain Research Institute, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Jamie D Feusner
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - John M Stern
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lenio S, Kerr WT, Watson M, Baker S, Bush C, Rajic A, Strom L. Validation of a predictive calculator to distinguish between patients presenting with dissociative versus epileptic seizures. Epilepsy Behav 2021; 116:107767. [PMID: 33545649 PMCID: PMC7951947 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.107767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2020] [Revised: 12/29/2020] [Accepted: 12/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Dissociative seizures (also known as psychogenic nonepileptic seizures) are a common functional neurological disorder that can be difficult to distinguish from epileptic seizures. Patients with dissociative seizures provide diagnostic challenges, leading to delays in care, inappropriate care, and significant healthcare utilization and associated costs. The dissociative seizure likelihood score (DSLS) was developed by Kerr and colleagues at UCLA to distinguish between patients with epileptic seizures and dissociative seizures based on clinical and medication history as well as features of seizure semiology. We validated this calculator at the University of Colorado, which is a Level 4 National Association of Epilepsy Center. The DSLS accurately predicted the diagnosis in 81% of patients, despite local variability in the factors associated with epileptic versus dissociative seizures between the two populations. The DSLS can be a useful tool to assist with history taking and may have important utility for clinical decision making with these difficult to distinguish patient populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Lenio
- Department of Neurology, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
| | - Wesley T Kerr
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Meagan Watson
- Department of Neurology, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Sarah Baker
- Department of Neurology, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Chad Bush
- Department of Neurology, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Alex Rajic
- Department of Neurology, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Laura Strom
- Department of Neurology, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kerr WT, Zhang X, Hill CE, Janio EA, Chau AM, Braesch CT, Le JM, Hori JM, Patel AB, Allas CH, Karimi AH, Dubey I, Sreenivasan SS, Gallardo NL, Bauirjan J, Hwang ES, Davis EC, D'Ambrosio SR, Al Banna M, Cho AY, Dewar SR, Engel J, Feusner JD, Stern JM. Factors associated with delay to video-EEG in dissociative seizures. Seizure 2021; 86:155-160. [PMID: 33621828 DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2021.02.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 01/23/2021] [Accepted: 02/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE While certain clinical factors suggest a diagnosis of dissociative seizures (DS), otherwise known as functional or psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES), ictal video-electroencephalography monitoring (VEM) is the gold standard for diagnosis. Diagnostic delays were associated with worse quality of life and more seizures, even after treatment. To understand why diagnoses were delayed, we evaluated which factors were associated with delay to VEM. METHODS Using data from 341 consecutive patients with VEM-documented dissociative seizures, we used multivariate log-normal regression with recursive feature elimination (RFE) and multiple imputation of some missing data to evaluate which of 76 clinical factors were associated with time from first dissociative seizure to VEM. RESULTS The mean delay to VEM was 8.4 years (median 3 years, IQR 1-10 years). In the RFE multivariate model, the factors associated with longer delay to VEM included more past antiseizure medications (0.19 log-years/medication, standard error (SE) 0.05), more medications for other medical conditions (0.06 log-years/medication, SE 0.03), history of physical abuse (0.75 log-years, SE 0.27), and more seizure types (0.36 log-years/type, SE 0.11). Factors associated with shorter delay included active employment or student status (-1.05 log-years, SE 0.21) and higher seizure frequency (0.14 log-years/log[seizure/month], SE 0.06). CONCLUSIONS Patients with greater medical and seizure complexity had longer delays. Delays in multiple domains of healthcare can be common for victims of physical abuse. Unemployed and non-student patients may have had more barriers to access VEM. These results support earlier referral of complex cases to a comprehensive epilepsy center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wesley T Kerr
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
| | - Xingruo Zhang
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Chloe E Hill
- Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Emily A Janio
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Andrea M Chau
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Chelsea T Braesch
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Justine M Le
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Jessica M Hori
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Akash B Patel
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Corinne H Allas
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Amir H Karimi
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Ishita Dubey
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Siddhika S Sreenivasan
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Norma L Gallardo
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Janar Bauirjan
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Eric S Hwang
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Emily C Davis
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Shannon R D'Ambrosio
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Mona Al Banna
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Andrew Y Cho
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Sandra R Dewar
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Jerome Engel
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Department of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Brain Research Institute, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Jamie D Feusner
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - John M Stern
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Objective score from initial interview identifies patients with probable dissociative seizures. Epilepsy Behav 2020; 113:107525. [PMID: 33197798 PMCID: PMC7736162 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2020] [Revised: 09/21/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop a Dissociative Seizures Likelihood Score (DSLS), which is a comprehensive, evidence-based tool using information available during the first outpatient visit to identify patients with "probable" dissociative seizures (DS) to allow early triage to more extensive diagnostic assessment. METHODS Based on data from 1616 patients with video-electroencephalography (vEEG) confirmed diagnoses, we compared the clinical history from a single neurology interview of patients in five mutually exclusive groups: epileptic seizures (ES), DS, physiologic nonepileptic seizure-like events (PSLE), mixed DS plus ES, and inconclusive monitoring. We used data-driven methods to determine the diagnostic utility of 76 features from retrospective chart review and applied this model to prospective interviews. RESULTS The DSLS using recursive feature elimination (RFE) correctly identified 77% (95% confidence interval (CI), 74-80%) of prospective patients with either ES or DS, with a sensitivity of 74% and specificity of 84%. This accuracy was not significantly inferior than neurologists' impression (84%, 95% CI: 80-88%) and the kappa between neurologists' and the DSLS was 21% (95% CI: 1-41%). Only 3% of patients with DS were missed by both the fellows and our score (95% CI 0-11%). SIGNIFICANCE The evidence-based DSLS establishes one method to reliably identify some patients with probable DS using clinical history. The DSLS supports and does not replace clinical decision making. While not all patients with DS can be identified by clinical history alone, these methods combined with clinical judgement could be used to identify patients who warrant further diagnostic assessment at a comprehensive epilepsy center.
Collapse
|
14
|
Saunders CH, Petersen CL, Durand MA, Bagley PJ, Elwyn G. Bring on the Machines: Could Machine Learning Improve the Quality of Patient Education Materials? A Systematic Search and Rapid Review. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2018; 2:1-16. [PMID: 30652611 PMCID: PMC6874040 DOI: 10.1200/cci.18.00010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Clear and trustworthy information is essential for people who are ill. People with cancer, in particular, are targeted with vast quantities of patient education material, but of variable quality. Machine learning technologies are popular across industries for automated tasks, like analyzing language and spotting readability issues. With the experience of patients with cancer in mind, we reviewed whether anyone has proposed, modeled, or applied machine learning technologies for the assessment of patient education materials and explored the utility of this application. METHODS We systematically searched the literature to identify English-language articles published in peer-reviewed journals or as conference abstracts that proposed, used, or modeled the use of machine learning technology to assess patient education materials. Specifically, we searched MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Compendex. Two reviewers assessed study eligibility and performed study screening. RESULTS We identified 1,570 publications in our search after duplicate removal. After screening, we included five projects (detailed in nine articles) that proposed, modeled, or used machine learning technology to assess the quality of patient education materials. We evaluated the utility of each application across four domains: multidimensionality (2 of 5 applications), patient centeredness (1 of 5 applications), customizability (0 of 5 applications), and development stage (theoretical, 1 of 5 applications; in development, 3 of 5 applications; complete and available, 1 of 5 applications). Combining points across each domain, the mean utlity score across included projects was 1.8 of 5 possible points. CONCLUSION Given its potential, machine learning has not yet been leveraged substantially in the assessment of patient education materials. We propose machine learning systems that can dynamically identify problematic language and content by assessing the quality of patient education materials across a range of flexible, customizable criteria. Assessment may help patients and families decide which materials to use and encourage developers to improve materials overall.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine H. Saunders
- Catherine H. Saunders, Curtis L. Petersen, Marie-Anne Durand, and Glyn Elwyn, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice; Curtis L. Petersen, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth; and Pamela J. Bagley, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH
| | - Curtis L. Petersen
- Catherine H. Saunders, Curtis L. Petersen, Marie-Anne Durand, and Glyn Elwyn, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice; Curtis L. Petersen, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth; and Pamela J. Bagley, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH
| | - Marie-Anne Durand
- Catherine H. Saunders, Curtis L. Petersen, Marie-Anne Durand, and Glyn Elwyn, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice; Curtis L. Petersen, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth; and Pamela J. Bagley, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH
| | - Pamela J. Bagley
- Catherine H. Saunders, Curtis L. Petersen, Marie-Anne Durand, and Glyn Elwyn, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice; Curtis L. Petersen, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth; and Pamela J. Bagley, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH
| | - Glyn Elwyn
- Catherine H. Saunders, Curtis L. Petersen, Marie-Anne Durand, and Glyn Elwyn, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice; Curtis L. Petersen, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth; and Pamela J. Bagley, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kerr WT, Janio EA, Braesch CT, Le JM, Hori JM, Patel AB, Gallardo NL, Bauirjan J, Chau AM, Hwang ES, Davis EC, Buchard A, Torres-Barba D, D'Ambrosio S, Al Banna M, Cho AY, Engel J, Cohen MS, Stern JM. An objective score to identify psychogenic seizures based on age of onset and history. Epilepsy Behav 2018; 80:75-83. [PMID: 29414562 PMCID: PMC5845850 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.11.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2017] [Revised: 11/27/2017] [Accepted: 11/28/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Psychogenic nonepileptic seizure (PNES) is a common diagnosis after evaluation of medication resistant or atypical seizures with video-electroencephalographic monitoring (VEM), but usually follows a long delay after the development of seizures, during which patients are treated for epilepsy. Therefore, more readily available diagnostic tools are needed for earlier identification of patients at risk for PNES. A tool based on patient-reported psychosocial history would be especially beneficial because it could be implemented in the outpatient clinic. METHODS Based on the data from 1375 patients with VEM-confirmed diagnoses, we used logistic regression to compare the frequency of specific patient-reported historical events, demographic information, age of onset, and delay from first seizure until VEM in five mutually exclusive groups of patients: epileptic seizures (ES), PNES, physiologic nonepileptic seizure-like events (PSLE), mixed PNES plus ES, and inconclusive monitoring. To determine the diagnostic utility of this information to differentiate PNES only from ES only, we used multivariate piecewise-linear logistic regression trained using retrospective data from chart review and validated based on data from 246 prospective standardized interviews. RESULTS The prospective area under the curve of our weighted multivariate piecewise-linear by-sex score was 73%, with the threshold that maximized overall retrospective accuracy resulting in a prospective sensitivity of 74% (95% CI: 70-79%) and prospective specificity of 71% (95% CI: 64-82%). The linear model and piecewise linear without an interaction term for sex had very similar performance statistics. In the multivariate piecewise-linear sex-split predictive model, the significant factors positively associated with ES were history of febrile seizures, current employment or active student status, history of traumatic brain injury (TBI), and longer delay from first seizure until VEM. The significant factors associated with PNES were female sex, older age of onset, mild TBI, and significant stressful events with sexual abuse, in particular, increasing the likelihood of PNES. Delays longer than 20years, age of onset after 31years for men, and age of onset after 40years for women had no additional effect on the likelihood of PNES. DISCUSSION Our promising results suggest that an objective score has the potential to serve as an early outpatient screening tool to identify patients with greater likelihood of PNES when considered in combination with other factors. In addition, our analysis suggests that sexual abuse, more than other psychological stressors including physical abuse, is more associated with PNES. There was a trend of increasing frequency of PNES for women during childbearing years and plateauing outside those years that was not observed in men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wesley T Kerr
- Department of Biomathematics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Department of Internal Medicine, Eisenhower Medical Center, Rancho Mirage, CA, United States.
| | - Emily A Janio
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Chelsea T Braesch
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Justine M Le
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Jessica M Hori
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Akash B Patel
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Norma L Gallardo
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Janar Bauirjan
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Andrea M Chau
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Eric S Hwang
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Emily C Davis
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Albert Buchard
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - David Torres-Barba
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Shannon D'Ambrosio
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Mona Al Banna
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Andrew Y Cho
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Jerome Engel
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Departments of Neurology and Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Brain Research Institute, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Mark S Cohen
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Departments of Neurology and Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Departments of Radiology, Psychology, Biomedical Physics, and Bioengineering, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States; California NanoSystems Institute, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - John M Stern
- Departments of Neurology and Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kerr WT, Janio EA, Braesch CT, Le JM, Hori JM, Patel AB, Gallardo NL, Bauirjan J, D'Ambrosio SR, Chau AM, Hwang ES, Davis EC, Buchard A, Torres-Barba D, Al Banna M, Barritt SE, Cho AY, Engel J, Cohen MS, Stern JM. Identifying psychogenic seizures through comorbidities and medication history. Epilepsia 2017; 58:1852-1860. [PMID: 28895657 DOI: 10.1111/epi.13888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/08/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Low-cost evidence-based tools are needed to facilitate the early identification of patients with possible psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES). Prior to accurate diagnosis, patients with PNES do not receive interventions that address the cause of their seizures and therefore incur high medical costs and disability due to an uncontrolled seizure disorder. Both seizures and comorbidities may contribute to this high cost. METHODS Based on data from 1,365 adult patients with video-electroencephalography-confirmed diagnoses from a single center, we used logistic and Poisson regression to compare the total number of comorbidities, number of medications, and presence of specific comorbidities in five mutually exclusive groups of diagnoses: epileptic seizures (ES) only, PNES only, mixed PNES and ES, physiologic nonepileptic seizurelike events, and inconclusive monitoring. To determine the diagnostic utility of comorbid diagnoses and medication history to differentiate PNES only from ES only, we used multivariate logistic regression, controlling for sex and age, trained using a retrospective database and validated using a prospective database. RESULTS Our model differentiated PNES only from ES only with a prospective accuracy of 78% (95% confidence interval =72-84%) and area under the curve of 79%. With a few exceptions, the number of comorbidities and medications was more predictive than a specific comorbidity. Comorbidities associated with PNES were asthma, chronic pain, and migraines (p < 0.01). Comorbidities associated with ES were diabetes mellitus and nonmetastatic neoplasm (p < 0.01). The population-level analysis suggested that patients with mixed PNES and ES may be a population distinct from patients with either condition alone. SIGNIFICANCE An accurate patient-reported medical history and medication history can be useful when screening for possible PNES. Our prospectively validated and objective score may assist in the interpretation of the medication and medical history in the context of the seizure description and history.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wesley T Kerr
- Department of Internal Medicine, Eisenhower Medical Center, Rancho Mirage, California, U.S.A.,Department of Biomathematics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.,Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Emily A Janio
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Chelsea T Braesch
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Justine M Le
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Jessica M Hori
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Akash B Patel
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Norma L Gallardo
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Janar Bauirjan
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Shannon R D'Ambrosio
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Andrea M Chau
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Eric S Hwang
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Emily C Davis
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Albert Buchard
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - David Torres-Barba
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Mona Al Banna
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Sarah E Barritt
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Andrew Y Cho
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Jerome Engel
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.,Departments of Neurology and Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.,Brain Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Mark S Cohen
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.,Departments of Neurology and Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.,Departments of Radiology, Psychology, Biomedical Physics, and Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.,California NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - John M Stern
- Departments of Neurology and Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kerr WT, Janio EA, Braesch CT, Le JM, Hori JM, Patel AB, Barritt SE, Gallardo NL, Bauirjan J, Chau AM, Hwang ES, Davis EC, Torres-Barba D, Cho AY, Engel J, Cohen MS, Stern JM. Diagnostic implications of review-of-systems questionnaires to differentiate epileptic seizures from psychogenic seizures. Epilepsy Behav 2017; 69:69-74. [PMID: 28236725 PMCID: PMC5423814 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2016] [Revised: 10/31/2016] [Accepted: 11/03/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Early and accurate diagnosis of patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) leads to appropriate treatment and improves long-term seizure prognosis. However, this is complicated by the need to record seizures to make a definitive diagnosis. Suspicion for PNES can be raised through knowledge that patients with PNES have increased somatic sensitivity and report more positive complaints on review-of-systems questionnaires (RoSQs) than patients with epileptic seizures. If the responses on the RoSQ can differentiate PNES from other seizure types, then these forms could be an early screening tool. METHODS Our dataset included all patients admitted from January 2006 to June 2016 for video-electroencephalography at UCLA. RoSQs prior to May 2015 were acquired through retrospective chart review (n=405), whereas RoSQs from subsequent patients were acquired prospectively (n=190). Controlling for sex and number of comorbidities, we used binomial regression to compare the total number of symptoms and the frequency of specific symptoms between five mutually exclusive groups of patients: epileptic seizures (ES), PNES, physiologic nonepileptic seizure-like events (PSLE), mixed PNES plus ES, and inconclusive monitoring. To determine the diagnostic utility of RoSQs to differentiate PNES only from ES only, we used multivariate logistic regression, controlling for sex and the number of medical comorbidities. RESULTS On average, patients with PNES or mixed PNES and ES reported more than twice as many symptoms than patients with isolated ES or PSLE (p<0.001). The prospective accuracy to differentiate PNES from ES was not significantly higher than naïve assumption that all patients had ES (76% vs 70%, p>0.1). DISCUSSION This analysis of RoSQs confirms that patients with PNES with and without comorbid ES report more symptoms on a population level than patients with epilepsy or PSLE. While these differences help describe the population of patients with PNES, the consistency of RoSQ responses was neither accurate nor specific enough to be used solely as an early screening tool for PNES. Our results suggest that the RoSQ may help differentiate PNES from ES only when, based on other information, the pre-test probability of PNES is at least 50%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wesley T. Kerr
- Department of Biomathematics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California,Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Emily A. Janio
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Chelsea T. Braesch
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Justine M. Le
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jessica M. Hori
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Akash B. Patel
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Sarah E. Barritt
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Norma L. Gallardo
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Janar Bauirjan
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Andrea M. Chau
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Eric S. Hwang
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Emily C. Davis
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - David Torres-Barba
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Andrew Y. Cho
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jerome Engel
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California,Departments of Neurology and Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California,Brain Research Institute, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Mark S. Cohen
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California,Departments of Neurology and Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California,Departments of Radiology, Psychology, Biomedical Physics, and Bioengineering, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California,California NanoSystems Institute, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - John M. Stern
- Departments of Neurology and Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kerr WT, Janio EA, Le JM, Hori JM, Patel AB, Gallardo NL, Bauirjan J, Chau AM, D'Ambrosio SR, Cho AY, Engel J, Cohen MS, Stern JM. Diagnostic delay in psychogenic seizures and the association with anti-seizure medication trials. Seizure 2016; 40:123-6. [PMID: 27398686 PMCID: PMC4966997 DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2016.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2016] [Accepted: 06/17/2016] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The average delay from first seizure to diagnosis of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) is over 7 years. The reason for this delay is not well understood. We hypothesized that a perceived decrease in seizure frequency after starting an anti-seizure medication (ASM) may contribute to longer delays, but the frequency of such a response has not been well established. METHODS Time from onset to diagnosis, medication history and associated seizure frequency was acquired from the medical records of 297 consecutive patients with PNES diagnosed using video-electroencephalographic monitoring. Exponential regression was used to model the effect of medication trials and response on diagnostic delay. RESULTS Mean diagnostic delay was 8.4 years (min 1 day, max 52 years). The robust average diagnostic delay was 2.8 years (95% CI: 2.2-3.5 years) based on an exponential model as 10 to the mean of log10 delay. Each ASM trial increased the robust average delay exponentially by at least one third of a year (Wald t=3.6, p=0.004). Response to ASM trials did not significantly change diagnostic delay (Wald t=-0.9, p=0.38). CONCLUSION Although a response to ASMs was observed commonly in these patients with PNES, the presence of a response was not associated with longer time until definitive diagnosis. Instead, the number of ASMs tried was associated with a longer delay until diagnosis, suggesting that ASM trials were continued despite lack of response. These data support the guideline that patients with seizures should be referred to epilepsy care centers after failure of two medication trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wesley T Kerr
- Department of Biomathematics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
| | - Emily A Janio
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Justine M Le
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Jessica M Hori
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Akash B Patel
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Norma L Gallardo
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Janar Bauirjan
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Andrea M Chau
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Shannon R D'Ambrosio
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Andrew Y Cho
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Jerome Engel
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Departments of Neurology and Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Brain Research Institute, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Mark S Cohen
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Departments of Neurology and Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Departments of Radiology, Psychology, Biomedical Physics, and Bioengineering, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States; California NanoSystems Institute, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - John M Stern
- Departments of Neurology and Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Pyrzowski J, Siemiński M, Sarnowska A, Jedrzejczak J, Nyka WM. Interval analysis of interictal EEG: pathology of the alpha rhythm in focal epilepsy. Sci Rep 2015; 5:16230. [PMID: 26553287 PMCID: PMC4639771 DOI: 10.1038/srep16230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2015] [Accepted: 10/09/2015] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The contemporary use of interictal scalp electroencephalography (EEG) in the context of focal epilepsy workup relies on the visual identification of interictal epileptiform discharges. The high-specificity performance of this marker comes, however, at a cost of only moderate sensitivity. Zero-crossing interval analysis is an alternative to Fourier analysis for the assessment of the rhythmic component of EEG signals. We applied this method to standard EEG recordings of 78 patients divided into 4 subgroups: temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), frontal lobe epilepsy (FLE), psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) and nonepileptic patients with headache. Interval-analysis based markers were capable of effectively discriminating patients with epilepsy from those in control subgroups (AUC~0.8) with diagnostic sensitivity potentially exceeding that of visual analysis. The identified putative epilepsy-specific markers were sensitive to the properties of the alpha rhythm and displayed weak or non-significant dependences on the number of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) taken by the patients. Significant AED-related effects were concentrated in the theta interval range and an associated marker allowed for identification of patients on AED polytherapy (AUC~0.9). Interval analysis may thus, in perspective, increase the diagnostic yield of interictal scalp EEG. Our findings point to the possible existence of alpha rhythm abnormalities in patients with epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Pyrzowski
- Department of Adult Neurology, Medical University of Gdansk, Poland
| | | | - Anna Sarnowska
- Department of Neurology and Epileptology, Medical Centre for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Joanna Jedrzejczak
- Department of Neurology and Epileptology, Medical Centre for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Walenty M Nyka
- Department of Adult Neurology, Medical University of Gdansk, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Memarian N, Kim S, Dewar S, Engel J, Staba RJ. Multimodal data and machine learning for surgery outcome prediction in complicated cases of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Comput Biol Med 2015; 64:67-78. [PMID: 26149291 PMCID: PMC4554822 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2015.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2015] [Revised: 06/04/2015] [Accepted: 06/10/2015] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study sought to predict postsurgical seizure freedom from pre-operative diagnostic test results and clinical information using a rapid automated approach, based on supervised learning methods in patients with drug-resistant focal seizures suspected to begin in temporal lobe. METHOD We applied machine learning, specifically a combination of mutual information-based feature selection and supervised learning classifiers on multimodal data, to predict surgery outcome retrospectively in 20 presurgical patients (13 female; mean age±SD, in years 33±9.7 for females, and 35.3±9.4 for males) who were diagnosed with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) and subsequently underwent standard anteromesial temporal lobectomy. The main advantage of the present work over previous studies is the inclusion of the extent of ipsilateral neocortical gray matter atrophy and spatiotemporal properties of depth electrode-recorded seizures as training features for individual patient surgery planning. RESULTS A maximum relevance minimum redundancy (mRMR) feature selector identified the following features as the most informative predictors of postsurgical seizure freedom in this study's sample of patients: family history of epilepsy, ictal EEG onset pattern (positive correlation with seizure freedom), MRI-based gray matter thickness reduction in the hemisphere ipsilateral to seizure onset, proportion of seizures that first appeared in ipsilateral amygdala to total seizures, age, epilepsy duration, delay in the spread of ipsilateral ictal discharges from site of onset, gender, and number of electrode contacts at seizure onset (negative correlation with seizure freedom). Using these features in combination with a least square support vector machine (LS-SVM) classifier compared to other commonly used classifiers resulted in very high surgical outcome prediction accuracy (95%). CONCLUSIONS Supervised machine learning using multimodal compared to unimodal data accurately predicted postsurgical outcome in patients with atypical MTLE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Negar Memarian
- Department of Psychology, David Geffen School of Medicine and at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States; Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine and at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States.
| | - Sally Kim
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine and at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States
| | - Sandra Dewar
- Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine and at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States
| | - Jerome Engel
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine and at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States; Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine and at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States; Department of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine and at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States; Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine and at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States
| | - Richard J Staba
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine and at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kerr WT, Hwang ES, Raman KR, Barritt SE, Patel AB, Le JM, Hori JM, Davis EC, Braesch CT, Janio EA, Lau EP, Cho AY, Anderson A, Silverman DH, Salamon N, Engel J, Stern JM, Cohen MS. Multimodal diagnosis of epilepsy using conditional dependence and multiple imputation. ... INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON PATTERN RECOGNITION IN NEUROIMAGING. INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON PATTERN RECOGNITION IN NEUROIMAGING 2014:1-4. [PMID: 25311448 PMCID: PMC4188529 DOI: 10.1109/prni.2014.6858526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
The definitive diagnosis of the type of epilepsy, if it exists, in medication-resistant seizure disorder is based on the efficient combination of clinical information, long-term video-electroencephalography (EEG) and neuroimaging. Diagnoses are reached by a consensus panel that combines these diverse modalities using clinical wisdom and experience. Here we compare two methods of multimodal computer-aided diagnosis, vector concatenation (VC) and conditional dependence (CD), using clinical archive data from 645 patients with medication-resistant seizure disorder, confirmed by video-EEG. CD models the clinical decision process, whereas VC allows for statistical modeling of cross-modality interactions. Due to the nature of clinical data, not all information was available in all patients. To overcome this, we multiply-imputed the missing data. Using a C4.5 decision tree, single modality classifiers achieved 53.1%, 51.5% and 51.1% average accuracy for MRI, clinical information and FDG-PET, respectively, for the discrimination between non-epileptic seizures, temporal lobe epilepsy, other focal epilepsies and generalized-onset epilepsy (vs. chance, p<0.01). Using VC, the average accuracy was significantly lower (39.2%). In contrast, the CD classifier that classified with MRI then clinical information achieved an average accuracy of 58.7% (vs. VC, p<0.01). The decrease in accuracy of VC compared to the MRI classifier illustrates how the addition of more informative features does not improve performance monotonically. The superiority of conditional dependence over vector concatenation suggests that the structure imposed by conditional dependence improved our ability to model the underlying diagnostic trends in the multimodality data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wesley T. Kerr
- Dept. of Biomathematics, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, Semel Institute, 760 Westwood Plaza, Suite 17-369, Los Angeles, California 90095, Telephone: (310) 986-3307
- Dept. of Psychiatry, Neuropsychiatric Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, Semel Institute, 760 Westwood Plaza, Suite 17-369, Los Angeles, California 90095
| | - Eric S. Hwang
- Dept. of Psychiatry, Neuropsychiatric Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, Semel Institute, 760 Westwood Plaza, Suite 17-369, Los Angeles, California 90095
| | - Kaavya R. Raman
- Dept. of Psychiatry, Neuropsychiatric Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, Semel Institute, 760 Westwood Plaza, Suite 17-369, Los Angeles, California 90095
| | - Sarah E. Barritt
- Dept. of Psychiatry, Neuropsychiatric Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, Semel Institute, 760 Westwood Plaza, Suite 17-369, Los Angeles, California 90095
| | - Akash B. Patel
- Dept. of Psychiatry, Neuropsychiatric Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, Semel Institute, 760 Westwood Plaza, Suite 17-369, Los Angeles, California 90095
| | - Justine M. Le
- Dept. of Psychiatry, Neuropsychiatric Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, Semel Institute, 760 Westwood Plaza, Suite 17-369, Los Angeles, California 90095
| | - Jessica M. Hori
- Dept. of Psychiatry, Neuropsychiatric Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, Semel Institute, 760 Westwood Plaza, Suite 17-369, Los Angeles, California 90095
| | - Emily C. Davis
- Dept. of Psychiatry, Neuropsychiatric Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, Semel Institute, 760 Westwood Plaza, Suite 17-369, Los Angeles, California 90095
| | - Chelsea T. Braesch
- Dept. of Psychiatry, Neuropsychiatric Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, Semel Institute, 760 Westwood Plaza, Suite 17-369, Los Angeles, California 90095
| | - Emily A. Janio
- Dept. of Psychiatry, Neuropsychiatric Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, Semel Institute, 760 Westwood Plaza, Suite 17-369, Los Angeles, California 90095
| | - Edward P. Lau
- Dept. of Psychiatry, Neuropsychiatric Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, Semel Institute, 760 Westwood Plaza, Suite 17-369, Los Angeles, California 90095
| | - Andrew Y. Cho
- Dept. of Psychiatry, Neuropsychiatric Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, Semel Institute, 760 Westwood Plaza, Suite 17-369, Los Angeles, California 90095
| | - Ariana Anderson
- Dept. of Psychiatry, Neuropsychiatric Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, Semel Institute, 760 Westwood Plaza, Suite 17-369, Los Angeles, California 90095
| | - Daniel H.S. Silverman
- Dept. of Molecular & Medical Pharmacology, Ahmanson Translational Imaging Division, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, Semel Institute, 760 Westwood Plaza, Suite 17-369, Los Angeles, California 90095
| | - Noriko Salamon
- Dept. of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, Semel Institute, 760 Westwood Plaza, Suite 17-369, Los Angeles, California 90095
| | - Jerome Engel
- Dept. of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, Semel Institute, 760 Westwood Plaza, Suite 17-369, Los Angeles, California 90095
| | - John M. Stern
- Dept. of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, Semel Institute, 760 Westwood Plaza, Suite 17-369, Los Angeles, California 90095
| | - Mark S. Cohen
- Dept. of Psychiatry, Neuropsychiatric Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, Semel Institute, 760 Westwood Plaza, Suite 17-369, Los Angeles, California 90095
- Dept. of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, Semel Institute, 760 Westwood Plaza, Suite 17-369, Los Angeles, California 90095
- Dept. of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, Semel Institute, 760 Westwood Plaza, Suite 17-369, Los Angeles, California 90095
- Dept. of Psychology, Biomedical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, California Nanosystems Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, Semel Institute, 760 Westwood Plaza, Suite 17-369, Los Angeles, California 90095
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kerr WT, Cho AY, Anderson A, Douglas PK, Lau EP, Hwang ES, Raman KR, Trefler A, Cohen MS, Nguyen ST, Reddy NM, Silverman DH. Balancing Clinical and Pathologic Relevence in the Machine Learning Diagnosis of Epilepsy. ... INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON PATTERN RECOGNITION IN NEUROIMAGING. INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON PATTERN RECOGNITION IN NEUROIMAGING 2013; 2013:86-89. [PMID: 25302313 PMCID: PMC4188528 DOI: 10.1109/prni.2013.31] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
The application of machine learning to epilepsy can be used both to develop clinically useful computer-aided diagnostic tools, and to reveal pathologically relevant insights into the disease. Such studies most frequently use neurologically normal patients as the control group to maximize the pathologic insight yielded from the model. This practice yields potentially inflated accuracy because the groups are quite dissimilar. A few manuscripts, however, opt to mimic the clinical comparison of epilepsy to non-epileptic seizures, an approach we believe to be more clinically realistic. In this manuscript, we describe the relative merits of each control group. We demonstrate that in our clinical quality FDG-PET database the performance achieved was similar using each control group. Based on these results, we find that the choice of control group likely does not hinder the reported performance. We argue that clinically applicable computer-aided diagnostic tools for epilepsy must directly address the clinical challenge of distinguishing patients with epilepsy from those with non-epileptic seizures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wesley T. Kerr
- Laboratory of Integrative Neuroimaging Technology University of California, Los Angeles Los Angeles, USA
| | - Andrew Y. Cho
- Laboratory of Integrative Neuroimaging Technology University of California, Los Angeles Los Angeles, USA
| | - Ariana Anderson
- Laboratory of Integrative Neuroimaging Technology University of California, Los Angeles Los Angeles, USA
| | - Pamela K. Douglas
- Laboratory of Integrative Neuroimaging Technology University of California, Los Angeles Los Angeles, USA
| | - Edward P. Lau
- Laboratory of Integrative Neuroimaging Technology University of California, Los Angeles Los Angeles, USA
| | - Eric S. Hwang
- Laboratory of Integrative Neuroimaging Technology University of California, Los Angeles Los Angeles, USA
| | - Kaavya R. Raman
- Laboratory of Integrative Neuroimaging Technology University of California, Los Angeles Los Angeles, USA
| | - Aaron Trefler
- Laboratory of Integrative Neuroimaging Technology University of California, Los Angeles Los Angeles, USA
| | - Mark S. Cohen
- Laboratory of Integrative Neuroimaging Technology University of California, Los Angeles Los Angeles, USA
| | - Stefan T. Nguyen
- Ahmanson Translational Imaging Division University of California, Los Angeles Los Angeles, USA
| | - Navya M. Reddy
- Ahmanson Translational Imaging Division University of California, Los Angeles Los Angeles, USA
| | - Daniel H. Silverman
- Ahmanson Translational Imaging Division University of California, Los Angeles Los Angeles, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kerr WT, Nguyen ST, Cho AY, Lau EP, Silverman DH, Douglas PK, Reddy NM, Anderson A, Bramen J, Salamon N, Stern JM, Cohen MS. Computer-Aided Diagnosis and Localization of Lateralized Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Using Interictal FDG-PET. Front Neurol 2013; 4:31. [PMID: 23565107 PMCID: PMC3615243 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2013.00031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2013] [Accepted: 03/18/2013] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Interictal FDG-PET (iPET) is a core tool for localizing the epileptogenic focus, potentially before structural MRI, that does not require rare and transient epileptiform discharges or seizures on EEG. The visual interpretation of iPET is challenging and requires years of epilepsy-specific expertise. We have developed an automated computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) tool that has the potential to work both independent of and synergistically with expert analysis. Our tool operates on distributed metabolic changes across the whole brain measured by iPET to both diagnose and lateralize temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). When diagnosing left TLE (LTLE) or right TLE (RTLE) vs. non-epileptic seizures (NES), our accuracy in reproducing the results of the gold standard long term video-EEG monitoring was 82% [95% confidence interval (CI) 69-90%] or 88% (95% CI 76-94%), respectively. The classifier that both diagnosed and lateralized the disease had overall accuracy of 76% (95% CI 66-84%), where 89% (95% CI 77-96%) of patients correctly identified with epilepsy were correctly lateralized. When identifying LTLE, our CAD tool utilized metabolic changes across the entire brain. By contrast, only temporal regions and the right frontal lobe cortex, were needed to identify RTLE accurately, a finding consistent with clinical observations and indicative of a potential pathophysiological difference between RTLE and LTLE. The goal of CADs is to complement - not replace - expert analysis. In our dataset, the accuracy of manual analysis (MA) of iPET (∼80%) was similar to CAD. The square correlation between our CAD tool and MA, however, was only 30%, indicating that our CAD tool does not recreate MA. The addition of clinical information to our CAD, however, did not substantively change performance. These results suggest that automated analysis might provide clinically valuable information to focus treatment more effectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wesley T. Kerr
- Department of Biomathematics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los AngelesLos Angeles, CA, USA
- Laboratory of Integrative Neuroimaging Technology, Department of Psychiatry, Neuropsychiatric Institute, University of California Los AngelesLos Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Stefan T. Nguyen
- Ahmanson Translational Imaging Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los AngelesLos Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Andrew Y. Cho
- Laboratory of Integrative Neuroimaging Technology, Department of Psychiatry, Neuropsychiatric Institute, University of California Los AngelesLos Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Edward P. Lau
- Laboratory of Integrative Neuroimaging Technology, Department of Psychiatry, Neuropsychiatric Institute, University of California Los AngelesLos Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Daniel H. Silverman
- Ahmanson Translational Imaging Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los AngelesLos Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Pamela K. Douglas
- Laboratory of Integrative Neuroimaging Technology, Department of Psychiatry, Neuropsychiatric Institute, University of California Los AngelesLos Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Navya M. Reddy
- Ahmanson Translational Imaging Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los AngelesLos Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ariana Anderson
- Laboratory of Integrative Neuroimaging Technology, Department of Psychiatry, Neuropsychiatric Institute, University of California Los AngelesLos Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jennifer Bramen
- Laboratory of Integrative Neuroimaging Technology, Department of Psychiatry, Neuropsychiatric Institute, University of California Los AngelesLos Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Noriko Salamon
- Department of Neurology, Seizure Disorder Center, University of California Los AngelesLos Angeles, CA, USA
| | - John M. Stern
- Department of Neurology, Seizure Disorder Center, University of California Los AngelesLos Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Mark S. Cohen
- Laboratory of Integrative Neuroimaging Technology, Department of Psychiatry, Neuropsychiatric Institute, University of California Los AngelesLos Angeles, CA, USA
- Laboratory of Integrative Neuroimaging Technology, Departments of Psychiatry, Neurology, Radiology, Biomedical Physics, Psychology and Bioengineering, University of California Los AngelesLos Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|