Acetaldehyde Production and Other ADH-Related Characteristics of Aerobic Bacteria Isolated From Hypochlorhydric Human Stomach

The oral microbiome and oral and upper gastrointestinal diseases

Background

Microbiomes are essential components of the human body, and their populations are substantial. Under normal circumstances, microbiomes coexist harmoniously with the human body, but disturbances in this equilibrium can lead to various diseases. The oral microbiome is involved in the occurrence and development of many oral and gastrointestinal diseases. This review focuses on the relationship between oral microbiomes and oral and upper gastrointestinal diseases, and therapeutic strategies aiming to provide valuable insights for clinical prevention and treatment.

Methods

To identify relevant studies, we conducted searches in PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science using keywords such as "oral microbiome," "oral flora, " "gastrointestinal disease, " without any date restrictions. Subsequently, the retrieved publications were subject to a narrative review.

Results

In this review, we found that oral microbiomes are closely related to oral and gastrointestinal diseases such as periodontitis, dental caries, reflux esophagitis, gastritis, and upper gastrointestinal tumors (mainly the malignant ones). Oral samples like saliva and buccal mucosa are not only easy to collect, but also display superior sample stability compared to gastrointestinal tissues. Consequently, analysis of the oral microbiome could potentially serve as an efficient preliminary screening method for high-risk groups before undergoing endoscopic examination. Besides, treatments based on the oral microbiomes could aid early diagnosis and treatment of these diseases.

Conclusions

Oral microbiomes are essential to oral and gastrointestinal diseases. Therapies centered on the oral microbiomes could facilitate the early detection and management of these conditions.

Ex vivo emission of volatile organic compounds from gastric cancer and non-cancerous tissue

The presence of certain volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the breath of patients with gastric cancer has been reported by a number of research groups; however, the source of these compounds remains controversial. Comparison of VOCs emitted from gastric cancer tissue to those emitted from non-cancerous tissue would help in understanding which of the VOCs are associated with gastric cancer and provide a deeper knowledge on their generation. Gas chromatography with mass spectrometric detection (GC-MS) coupled with head-space needle trap extraction (HS-NTE) as the pre-concentration technique, was used to identify and quantify VOCs released by gastric cancer and non-cancerous tissue samples collected from 41 patients during surgery. Excluding contaminants, a total of 32 VOCs were liberated by the tissue samples. The emission of four of them (carbon disulfide, pyridine, 3-methyl-2-butanone and 2-pentanone) was significantly higher from cancer tissue, whereas three compounds (isoprene, γ-butyrolactone and dimethyl sulfide) were in greater concentration from the non-cancerous tissues (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p < 0.05). Furthermore, the levels of three VOCs (2-methyl-1-propene, 2-propenenitrile and pyrrole) were correlated with the occurrence of H. pylori; and four compounds (acetonitrile, pyridine, toluene and 3-methylpyridine) were associated with tobacco smoking. Ex vivo analysis of VOCs emitted by human tissue samples provides a unique opportunity to identify chemical patterns associated with a cancerous state and can be considered as a complementary source of information on volatile biomarkers found in breath, blood or urine.

Local Acetaldehyde-An Essential Role in Alcohol-Related Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Carcinogenesis

The resident microbiome plays a key role in exposure of the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract mucosa to acetaldehyde (ACH), a carcinogenic metabolite of ethanol. Poor oral health is a significant risk factor for oral and esophageal carcinogenesis and is characterized by a dysbiotic microbiome. Dysbiosis leads to increased growth of opportunistic pathogens (such as Candida yeasts) and may cause an up to 100% increase in the local ACH production, which is further modified by organ-specific expression and gene polymorphisms of ethanol-metabolizing and ACH-metabolizing enzymes. A point mutation in the aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 gene has randomized millions of alcohol consumers to markedly increased local ACH exposure via saliva and gastric juice, which is associated with a manifold risk for upper GI tract cancers. This human cancer model proves conclusively the causal relationship between ACH and upper GI tract carcinogenesis and provides novel possibilities for the quantitative assessment of ACH carcinogenicity in the human oropharynx. ACH formed from ethanol present in "non-alcoholic" beverages, fermented food, or added during food preparation forms a significant epidemiologic bias in cancer epidemiology. The same also concerns "free" ACH present in mutagenic concentrations in multiple beverages and foodstuffs. Local exposure to ACH is cumulative and can be reduced markedly both at the population and individual level. At best, a person would never consume tobacco, alcohol, or both. However, even smoking cessation and moderation of alcohol consumption are associated with a marked decrease in local ACH exposure and cancer risk, especially among established risk groups.

Key role of local acetaldehyde in upper GI tract carcinogenesis

Ethanol is neither genotoxic nor mutagenic. Its first metabolite acetaldehyde, however, is a powerful local carcinogen. Point mutation in ALDH2 gene proves the causal relationship between acetaldehyde and upper digestive tract cancer in humans. Salivary acetaldehyde concentration and exposure time are the two major and quantifiable factors regulating the degree of local acetaldehyde exposure in the ideal target organ, oropharynx. Instant microbial acetaldehyde formation from alcohol represents >70% of total ethanol associated acetaldehyde exposure in the mouth. In the oropharynx and achlorhydric stomach acetaldehyde is not metabolized to safe products, instead in the presence of alcohol it accumulates in saliva and gastric juice in mutagenic concentrations. A common denominator in alcohol, tobacco and food associated upper digestive tract carcinogenesis is acetaldehyde. Epidemiological studies on upper GI tract cancer are biased, since they miss information on acetaldehyde exposure derived from alcohol and acetaldehyde present in 'non-alcoholic' beverages and food.

ALDH2-deficiency as genetic epidemiologic and biochemical model for the carcinogenicity of acetaldehyde

Humans are cumulatively exposed to acetaldehyde from various sources including alcoholic beverages, tobacco smoke, foods and beverages. The genetic-epidemiologic and biochemical evidence in ALDH2-deficient humans provides strong evidence for the causal relationship between acetaldehyde-exposure due to alcohol consumption and cancer of the upper digestive tract. The risk assessment has so far relied on thresholds based on animal toxicology with lower one-sided confidence limit of the benchmark dose values (BMDL) typically ranging between 11 and 63 mg/kg bodyweight (bw)/day dependent on species and endpoint. The animal data is problematic for regulatory toxicology for various reasons (lack in study quality, problems in animal models and appropriateness of endpoints - especially cancer - for transfer to humans). In this study, data from genetic epidemiologic and biochemical studies are reviewed. The increase in the daily exposure dose to acetaldehyde in alcohol-consuming ALDH2-deficients vs. ALDH2-actives was about twofold. The acetaldehyde increase due to ALDH2 inactivity was calculated to be 6.7 μg/kg bw/day for heavy drinkers, which is associated with odds ratios of up to 7 for head and neck as well as oesophageal cancer. Previous animal toxicology based risk assessments may have underestimated the risk of acetaldehyde. Risk assessments of acetaldehyde need to be revised using this updated evidence.

Alcohol consumption and corresponding factors: A novel perspective on the risk factors of esophageal cancer

Esophageal cancer is the eighth most common type of cancer in the world, and the sixth most common cause of mortality from cancer. Alcohol consumption is the major risk factor for esophageal cancer, due to the worldwide prevalence and high carcinogenicity of the ethanol metabolite. In epidemiological studies, the efficiency of alcohol intake to enhance the risk of esophageal cancer is altered by daily ethanol consumption, type of alcoholic beverages ingested, time since quitting drinking, age of drinking initiation, differences in population and subtypes of esophageal cancer. Corresponding factors, including gene polymorphisms, tobacco smoking, oral microorganisms and folate deficiency, reveal a synergistic effect in concurrent alcohol users that may lead to an increased risk of developing esophageal cancer. Consequently, esophageal cancer prevention involves multiple aspects, including quitting drinking and smoking, maintaining an adequate oral health and ingesting adequate quantities of folate, particularly in genetically high-risk populations.

A single sip of a strong alcoholic beverage causes exposure to carcinogenic concentrations of acetaldehyde in the oral cavity

The aim of this study was to explore oral exposure to carcinogenic (group 1) acetaldehyde after single sips of strong alcoholic beverages containing no or high concentrations of acetaldehyde. Eight volunteers tasted 5 ml of ethanol diluted to 40 vol.% with no acetaldehyde and 40 vol.% calvados containing 2400 μM acetaldehyde. Salivary acetaldehyde and ethanol concentrations were measured by gas chromatography. The protocol was repeated after ingestion of ethanol (0.5 g/kg body weight). Salivary acetaldehyde concentration was significantly higher after sipping calvados than after sipping ethanol at 30s both with (215 vs. 128 μmol/l, p<0.05) and without (258 vs. 89 μmol/l, p<0.05) alcohol ingestion. From 2 min onwards there were no significant differences in the decreasing salivary acetaldehyde concentration, which remained above the level of carcinogenicity still at 10 min. The systemic alcohol distribution from blood to saliva had no additional effect on salivary acetaldehyde after sipping of the alcoholic beverages. Carcinogenic concentrations of acetaldehyde are produced from ethanol in the oral cavity instantly after a small sip of strong alcoholic beverage, and the exposure continues for at least 10 min. Acetaldehyde present in the beverage has a short-term effect on total acetaldehyde exposure.

Reducing carcinogenic acetaldehyde exposure in the achlorhydric stomach with cysteine

BACKGROUND

Acetaldehyde, associated with alcohol consumption, has recently been classified as a group 1 carcinogen in humans. Achlorhydric atrophic gastritis is a well-known risk factor for gastric cancer. Achlorhydria leads to microbial colonization of the stomach. Several of these microbes are able to produce significant amounts of acetaldehyde by oxidation from alcohol. Acetaldehyde can be eliminated from saliva after alcohol intake and during smoking with a semi-essential amino acid, L-cysteine. The aim of this study was to determine whether cysteine can be used to bind acetaldehyde in the achlorhydric stomach after ethanol ingestion.

METHODS

Seven volunteers with achlorhydric atrophic gastritis were given either slow-release L-cysteine or placebo capsules in a double-blinded randomized trial. Volunteers served as their own controls. A naso-gastric tube was inserted to each volunteer. The volunteers ingested placebo or 200 mg of L-cysteine capsules, and ethanol 0.3 g/kg body weight (15 vol%) was infused intragastrically through a naso-gastric tube. Five-milliliter samples of gastric contents were aspirated at 5-minute intervals.

RESULTS

During the follow-up period, the mean acetaldehyde level of gastric juice was 2.6 times higher with placebo than with L-cysteine (13 vs. 4.7 μM, p < 0.05, n = 7).

CONCLUSIONS

L-cysteine can be used to decrease acetaldehyde concentration in the achlorhydric stomach during alcohol exposure. Intervention studies with L-cysteine are needed on reducing acetaldehyde exposure in this important risk group for gastric cancer.

Deficient aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 is associated with increased risk for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the presence of gastric hypochlorhydria

OBJECTIVE

In Orientals, deficient aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2) is associated with an increased risk for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The local metabolism of carcinogenic acetaldehyde in the upper gastrointestinal tract could be involved in the association, but the underlying mechanism has not been fully elucidated. Since an anacidic stomach can promote bacteria-catalyzed local acetaldehyde production, the gastric acid level could also affect acetaldehyde metabolism. This study investigated whether ALDH2-related susceptibility to ESCC differs depending on the gastric secretion level.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Sixty-two patients with ESCC and sex- and age-matched normal controls were enrolled in this study. ALDH2 polymorphism was analyzed by polymerase chain-restriction fragment length polymorphism, and those with an inactive allele (ALDH2-1/2-2 or ALDH2-2/2-2) were defined as ALDH2 deficient. Gastrin-stimulated acid output was assessed by endoscopic gastrin test and hypochlorhydria was defined as 0.6 mEq/10 min or lower. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to adjust for other potential confounders.

RESULTS

ALDH2 deficiency or hypochlorhydria was more prevalent in ESCC compared with controls and both showed increased independent associations with ESCC in multivariate analysis. Stratified analysis by the gastric acid secretion level revealed that the associations between the ALDH2 genotype and ESCC differed according to the individual gastric acid secretion levels and that ALDH2 deficiency was a significant risk factor for ESCC exclusively in individuals with hypochlorhydria with an odds ratio (95% confidence interval): 5.0 (1.2-21.2).

CONCLUSION

Microbial production of carcinogen acetaldehyde in the presence of gastric hypochlorhydria is most probably involved in the mechanism of ALDH2-related susceptibility to ESCC.

The diagnostic value of alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) isoenzymes and aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) measurement in the sera of gastric cancer patients

Alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) are present in gastric cancer cells (GC). Moreover, the activity of total ADH and class IV isoenzymes is significantly higher in cancer tissue than in healthy mucosa. The activity of these enzymes in cancer cells is probably reflected in the sera and could thus be helpful for diagnostics of gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate a potential role of ADH and ALDH as tumor markers for gastric cancer. We defined diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, predictive value for positive and negative results, and receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve for tested enzymes. Serum samples were taken from 168 patients with gastric cancer before treatment and from 168 control subjects. Total ADH activity and class III and IV isoenzymes were measured by photometric but ALDH activity and ADH I and II by the fluorometric method, with class-specific fluorogenic substrates. There was significant increase in the activity of ADH IV isoenzyme and ADH total in the sera of gastric cancer patients compared to the control. The diagnostic sensitivity for ADH IV was 73%, specificity 79%, positive and negative predictive values were 81 and 72% respectively. Area under ROC curve for ADH IV was 0.67. The results suggest a potential role for ADH IV as marker of gastric cancer.

Acetaldehyde as a common denominator and cumulative carcinogen in digestive tract cancers

The key issue in cancer prevention is the identification of specific aetiologic factors. Acetaldehyde, the first metabolite of ethanol oxidation, is carcinogenic in animals. ADH and ALDH2 gene mutations provide an exceptional human model to estimate the long-term effects of acetaldehyde exposure in man. These models provide strong evidence for the local carcinogenic potential of acetaldehyde also in humans. Ethanol is metabolized to acetaldehyde by both mucosal and microbial enzymes. Many microbes produce acetaldehyde from ethanol, but their capacity to eliminate acetaldehyde is low, which leads to the accumulation of acetaldehyde in saliva during an alcohol challenge. Acetaldehyde is the most abundant carcinogen in tobacco smoke, and it readily dissolves into saliva during smoking. Fermented food and many alcoholic beverages can also contain significant amounts of acetaldehyde. Thus acetaldehyde, derived from mucosal or microbial oxidation of ethanol, tobacco smoke, and/or diet, appears to act as a cumulative carcinogen in the upper digestive tract of humans. The evidence strongly suggests the importance of world-wide screening of acetaldehyde and ethanol levels in many beverages and foodstuffs, as well as an urgent need for regulatory measures and consumer guidance. Screening of the risk groups with enhanced acetaldehyde exposure, e.g. people with ADH and ALDH2 gene polymorphisms and hypochlorhydric atrophic gastritis, should also be seriously considered. Most importantly, the GRAS (generally regarded as safe) status of acetaldehyde, which allows it to be used as a food additive, should be re-evaluated, and the classification of acetaldehyde as a carcinogen should be upgraded.

The activity of class I, III, and IV of alcohol dehydrogenase isoenzymes and aldehyde dehydrogenase in gastric cancer

The metabolism of cancer is in many way different than in healthy cells. Increased metabolism of several carcinogenic substances may take place in cancer cells. The one of them was ethanol, that is oxidized by alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) to high concentration of acetaldehyde, a toxic and carcinogenic compound. The enzyme responsible for oxidation of acetaldehyde is aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH). The aim of this study was to compare the capacity for ethanol metabolism measured by ADH isoenzymes and ALDH activity between gastric cancer and normal gastric mucosa. Total ADH activity was measured by photometric method with p-nitrosodimethylaniline (NDMA) as a substrate and ALDH activity by the fluorometric method with 6-methoxy-2-naphtaldehyde as a substrate. For the measurement of the activity of class I isoenzymes, we used fluorometric methods, with class-specific fluorogenic substrates. The activity of class III ADH was measured by the photometric method with n-octanol and class IV with m-nitrobenzaldehyde as a substrate. The samples were taken surgically during routine operations of gastric carcinomas from 55 patients. The activities of total ADH, and the most important in gastric mucosa, class IV ADH were significantly higher in cancer cells than in healthy tissues. The other tested classes of ADH and ALDH showed a tendency toward higher activity in cancer than in healthy mucosa. The activities of all tested enzymes and isoenzymes were not significantly higher in men than in women in wither gastric cancer tissues or normal mucosa. The increased ADH IV activity may be 1 of the factors intensifying carcinogenesis by the increased ability to acetaldehyde formation from ethanol.

Acetaldehyde production from ethanol by oral streptococci

Alcohol is a well documented risk factor for upper digestive tract cancers. It has been shown that acetaldehyde, the first metabolite of ethanol is carcinogenic. The role of microbes in the production of acetaldehyde to the oral cavity has previously been described in several studies. In the present study, the aim was to investigate the capability of viridans group streptococci of normal oral flora to produce acetaldehyde in vitro during ethanol incubation. Furthermore, the aim was to measure the alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) activity of the bacteria. Eight clinical strains and eight American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) strains of viridans group streptococci were selected for the study. Bacterial suspensions were incubated in two different ethanol concentrations, 11 mM and 1100 mM and the acetaldehyde was measured by gas chromatography. ADH-activity was measured by using a sensitive spectroscopy. The results show significant differences between the bacterial strains regarding acetaldehyde production capability and the detected ADH-activity. In particular, clinical strain of Streptococcus salivarius, both clinical and culture collection strains of Streptococcus intermedius and culture collection strain of Streptococcus mitis produced high amounts of acetaldehyde in 11 mM and 1100 mM ethanol incubation. All these four bacterial strains also showed significant ADH-enzyme activity. Twelve other strains were found to be low acetaldehyde producers. Consequently, our study shows that viridans group streptococci may play a role in metabolizing ethanol to carcinogenic acetaldehyde in the mouth. The observation supports the concept of a novel mechanism in the pathogenesis of oral cancer.

Contribution of the alcohol dehydrogenase-1B genotype and oral microorganisms to high salivary acetaldehyde concentrations in Japanese alcoholic men

The less-active homozygous alcohol dehydrogenase-1B (ADH1B*1/*1) and inactive heterozygous aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 (ALDH2*1/*2) increase the risk of upper aerodigestive tract cancer (UADTC) in Japanese alcoholics. We evaluated associations between ADH1B/ALDH2 genotypes and the blood and salivary ethanol/acetaldehyde levels of 80 Japanese alcoholic men in the morning when they first visited our hospital after drinking the day before. Higher levels of ethanol persisted in the blood for longer periods in ADH1B*1/*1 carriers (n = 25) than in ADH1B*2 allele carriers after adjustment for the amount and time of the preceding alcohol consumption and body weight [median (25th-75th %): 20.5 mM (15.5-52.4) vs. below detection level (<DL) (<DL-6.4), p = 0.0003]. The ethanol levels in blood and saliva were similar, but the acetaldehyde levels in saliva were strikingly higher than in the blood, and were higher in ADH1B*1/*1 carriers than in ADH1B*2 allele carriers [47.4 muM (22.2-87.6) vs. 1.60 (<DL-26.3) in the saliva, p = 0.009]. The salivary acetaldehyde levels were correlated with salivary acetaldehyde production (r = 0.34, p = 0.002). The oral bacteria and yeast counts were correlated with salivary acetaldehyde production. Both the microorganisms counts and acetaldehyde production decreased after 3 weeks of abstinence, and the decreases were correlated (r = 0.35, p = 0.042). No effect of inactive ALDH2 (n = 12) on ethanol lingering the next morning was observed. In conclusion, the high salivary acetaldehyde levels in the alcoholics were partly attributable to prolonged ethanol exposure because of the less-active ADH1B and increased salivary acetaldehyde production as a result of oral microorganism overgrowth, and may explain their high risk for UADTC.