1
|
Ding JL, Ritchie CS, Vranceanu AM, Mace RA. Palliative Care Interventions for Persons With Neurodegenerative Disease: A Scoping Review of Clinical Trial Study Design Features. J Palliat Med 2024; 27:939-950. [PMID: 38364178 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Within palliative care research, best practice guidelines to conduct scientifically rigorous clinical trials for neurodegenerative diseases are underexplored. This patient population experiences unique challenges, including fluctuations in cognitive capacity, care partner (CP) and proxy involvement, and high adverse events (AEs), that necessitate special consideration when designing clinical trials. Objective: The objective of this study was to describe and identify clinical trial design features that have been documented in studies involving a neuropalliative intervention for persons with neurodegenerative diseases, highlighting features that have been adapted for this unique patient population. Design: We conducted a scoping review of clinical trials with a neuropalliative intervention for persons with neurodegenerative disease. We searched Cochrane, Web of Science, EMBASE, Scopus, and PubMed (MEDLINE) databases for articles published in English between 1950 and 2023. Two reviewers screened, extracted, and synthesized data from the included articles. A third reviewer adjudicated instances of conflict. The data were analyzed using a thematic framework approach. Results: Of 1025 texts, 44 articles were included. Seven study design features were analyzed: (1) consent, (2) proxies and CPs, (3) recruitment strategies, (4) retention strategies, (5) choice of comparator, (6) AEs, and (7) internal validity. This scoping review found disparities in study design features around structured consent, proxies and CPs, comparators, and AEs. Conclusions: To date, neuropalliative care clinical trials have had varied study designs and the majority of research has focused on dementia. Research guideline development for high-quality neuropalliative care clinical trials is greatly needed across the range of neurodegenerative diseases. To increase the scientific rigor of clinical trials and neuropalliative care, we recommend a standardized capacity assessment for consent, defining conditions for the CP, proxy, and AEs, systematizing appropriate comparators, and outlining preemptive recruitment and retention strategies to address the broader unpredictable challenges of palliative care research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica L Ding
- Division of Palliative Care and Geriatric Medicine, Mongan Institute Center for Aging and Serious Illness, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- MD-PhD Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
| | - Christine S Ritchie
- Division of Palliative Care and Geriatric Medicine, Mongan Institute Center for Aging and Serious Illness, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ana-Maria Vranceanu
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ryan A Mace
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Harris JI, Hanson D, Leskela J, Billig J, Padilla-Martinez V, Boyd J, Nienow T. Reconsidering research exclusion for serious mental illness: Ethical principles, current status, and recommendations. J Psychiatr Res 2021; 143:138-143. [PMID: 34487990 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Revised: 07/19/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Historically, individuals managing serious mental illness (SMI) have often been excluded from research, typically because of concern that these individuals may not be able to understand and provide truly informed consent. As treatment has improved, the assumption that individuals managing SMI may not be capable of consent needs to be re-examined. Systematic exclusion from research may limit empirically tested treatments available for people managing SMI, and may contribute to the health care disparities seen in this population. OBJECTIVES This article examines this issue by documenting current rates of research exclusion for high disease burden conditions, based on empirical review of studies in ClinicalTrials.gov. RESEARCH DESIGN Current rates of exclusion from studies for psychiatric conditions were assessed through systematic review of relevant clinical trials on ClinicalTrials.gov. SUBJECTS Subjects in this inquiry are either articles accessed in the literature reviews, or descriptions of studies in public data on ClinicalTrials.gov. MEASURES The primary measure was a previously published coding system to document the extent and types of research exclusion related to psychiatric status. RESULTS Among studies of interventions for substance use disorders and chronic pain, individuals managing SMI were more likely to be excluded than those with other psychiatric disorders at statistically significant levels. This was not the case among studies of interventions for ischemic heart disease. In studies of substance use disorders, 9% explicitly excluded SMI and 83% could exclude people with SMI based on broader exclusion criteria. In studies of chronic pain these two categories of exclusion were 16% and 55%, and in studies of ischemic heart disease, these two categories of exclusion were 1% and 20%. CONCLUSIONS Evidence indicates that it is ethically and scientifically more appropriate to exclude based on capacity to consent than membership in the group of individuals managing SMI. The discussion outlines techniques researchers can use for more equitable and generalizable sampling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Irene Harris
- VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA, USA; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
| | | | - Jennie Leskela
- University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA; ABPP Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - John Billig
- ABPP, National Center for Ethics in Health Care, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Jennifer Boyd
- San Francisco VA Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, USA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Tasha Nienow
- Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ries N, Mansfield E. Advance Research Directives: Dementia Researchers' Views on a Prototype Directive and Implementation Strategies. Ethics Hum Res 2021; 43:10-25. [PMID: 34019338 DOI: 10.1002/eahr.500091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Advance research directives (ARDs) enable people to document preferences for future research participation in the event of incapacity. This article reports on interviews with 11 dementia researchers in Australia that focused on the content of a prototype ARD and processes for making and using ARDs. Participants agreed that an ARD template should provide information to explain research and the rationale for making a directive, allow the person to nominate trusted individuals to be involved in future decisions, and record the person's general willingness or unwillingness to be involved in research. Providing a list of various research activities elicits preferences and risk tolerances in more detail. Priority groups for ARD implementation include people with a diagnosis involving progressive cognitive impairment and people interested in research. Researchers and health and legal professionals have a role in promoting ARDs. Our findings suggest that, as a voluntary strategy, ARDs could promote appropriate inclusion in research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nola Ries
- Professor of the Faculty of Law at the University of Technology Sydney
| | - Elise Mansfield
- Research associate of the Faculty of Health and Medicine at the University of Newcastle, Australia, and Hunter Medical Research Institute
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hérault É, Bravo G, Trottier L. Advance Directives for Research: How Do They Compare with Surrogates’ Predictions of Older Adults’ Preferences? ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018. [DOI: 10.1002/eahr.405002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Élodie Hérault
- University Institute of Geriatrics of Sherbrooke; Research Center on Aging
| | - Gina Bravo
- Research Center on Aging; Université de Sherbrooke; Department of Community Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
| | - Lise Trottier
- University Institute of Geriatrics of Sherbrooke; Research Center on Aging
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Laver K, Milte R, Dyer S, Crotty M. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Carer Focused and Dyadic Multicomponent Interventions for Carers of People With Dementia. J Aging Health 2016; 29:1308-1349. [PMID: 27458254 PMCID: PMC5680909 DOI: 10.1177/0898264316660414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of two approaches: multicomponent interventions that focus on working with the carer and dyadic interventions that work with both the carer and the person with dementia. Method: A systematic review involving a search of Medline, EMBASE, and PsycINFO in October 2015 was performed. Randomized controlled trials involving carers of people with dementia and comparing multicomponent interventions with usual care were included. Results: Pooling of all studies demonstrated that multicomponent interventions can reduce depressive symptoms, improve quality of life, reduce carer impact, and reduce behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia as well as caregiver upset with these symptoms. We were unable to find a significant difference in the effects of dyadic interventions in comparison with carer focused interventions for these outcomes. Discussion: Although effect sizes associated with intervention are small, multicomponent interventions are relatively inexpensive to deliver, acceptable, and widely applicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Laver
- 1 Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,2 NHMRC Cognitive Decline Partnership Centre, Australia
| | - Rachel Milte
- 1 Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,2 NHMRC Cognitive Decline Partnership Centre, Australia
| | - Suzanne Dyer
- 1 Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,2 NHMRC Cognitive Decline Partnership Centre, Australia
| | - Maria Crotty
- 1 Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,2 NHMRC Cognitive Decline Partnership Centre, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Boland J, Currow DC, Wilcock A, Tieman J, Hussain JA, Pitsillides C, Abernethy AP, Johnson MJ. A systematic review of strategies used to increase recruitment of people with cancer or organ failure into clinical trials: implications for palliative care research. J Pain Symptom Manage 2015; 49:762-772.e5. [PMID: 25546286 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.09.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2014] [Revised: 08/31/2014] [Accepted: 09/22/2014] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT The challenges of palliative care clinical trial recruitment are well documented. OBJECTIVES The aim of the study was to review tested strategies to improve recruitment to trials of people with a range of conditions who may access palliative care services but are not explicitly stated to be "palliative." METHODS This was a systematic review with narrative description. The Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, PsycINFO, and CINAHL electronic databases were searched (English; January 2002 to February 2014) for quasi-experimental and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) testing the effect of recruitment strategies on accrual to clinical trials of people with organ failure and cancer. Titles, abstracts, and retrieved articles were screened by two researchers and categorized by recruitment challenge: 1) patients with reduced cognition, 2) those requiring emergency treatment, and 3) willingness of patients and clinical staff to contribute to trials. RESULTS Of 549 articles identified, 15 were included. Thirteen reported RCTs and two papers reported three quasi-experimental studies. Five were cluster RCTs of recruiting sites/institutions. One was a randomized cluster, crossover, feasibility study. Seven studies recruited patients with cancer. Others included patients with dementia, stroke, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, frail elderly, and bereaved carers. Some interventions improved recruitment: memory aid, contact before arrival, cluster consent, "opt out" consent. Others either reduced recruitment (formal mental capacity assessment) or made no difference (advance research directive; a variety of educational, supportive, and advertising interventions). CONCLUSION Successful strategies from other disciplines could be considered by palliative care researchers. Tailored, efficient, evidence-based strategies must be developed, acknowledging that strategies with face validity are not necessarily the most effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Boland
- Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom
| | - David C Currow
- Discipline, Palliative and Supportive Services, Flinders University, Daw Park, South Australia, Australia
| | | | - Jennifer Tieman
- Discipline, Palliative and Supportive Services, Flinders University, Daw Park, South Australia, Australia
| | | | | | - Amy P Abernethy
- Discipline, Palliative and Supportive Services, Flinders University, Daw Park, South Australia, Australia; Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Miriam J Johnson
- Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Palmer BW, Savla GN, Roesch SC, Jeste DV. Changes in capacity to consent over time in patients involved in psychiatric research. Br J Psychiatry 2013; 202:454-8. [PMID: 23661766 PMCID: PMC3669878 DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.121160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2012] [Revised: 01/04/2013] [Accepted: 02/18/2013] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Informed consent is a key element of ethical clinical research. Patients with serious mental illness may be at risk for impaired consent capacity. Corrective feedback improves within-session comprehension of consent-relevant information, but little is known about the trajectory of patients' comprehension after the initial enrolment session. AIMS To examine whether within-session gains in understanding after feedback were maintained between study visits and to examine stability of decisional capacity over time. METHOD This was a longitudinal, within-participants comparison of decisional capacity assessed at baseline, 1 week, 3 months, 12 months and 24 months in 161 people with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. RESULTS Within-session gains from corrective feedback generally dissipated over each follow-up interval. Decisional capacity showed a general pattern of stability, but there was significant between-participant heterogeneity. Better neuropsychological performance was associated with better decisional capacity across time points. Positive symptoms of schizophrenia did not predict any aspects of decisional capacity, but general psychopathology, negative symptoms and depression evidenced some modest associations with certain subdomains of decisional capacity. CONCLUSIONS Informed consent may be most effectively construed as an ongoing dialogue with participants at each study visit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barton W Palmer
- University of California, San Diego MC 0993, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla CA 92093-0993, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Temporal stability of receptiveness to clinical research on Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2012; 24 Suppl:S30-4. [PMID: 20711058 DOI: 10.1097/wad.0b013e3181f14ac0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Research advance directives are a proposed mechanism for ensuring that decisions with regard to research participation adhere to preferences voiced by persons with Alzheimer disease (AD) before losing decisional capacity. Although this approach rests on the assumption that preferences with regard to research participation are consistent over time, little is known about the stability of such preferences. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the temporal stability of older adults' receptiveness to participation in clinical trials, neuroimaging studies, and psychosocial investigations on AD. One hundred and four participants in the University of Pittsburgh Alzheimer Disease Research Center were annually surveyed with regard to their willingness to be contacted with regard to clinical drug trials, neuroimaging studies, and psychosocial research for which they might be eligible. Receptiveness to contact with regard to AD research was compared at 2 time points, 1 year apart. At baseline, most respondents were willing to be contacted with regard to their eligibility for drug trials, imaging studies, and psychosocial research. Thirty-seven percent of respondents voiced a different set of preferences at year 2 as compared with year 1. Differences included both increased and decreased willingness to be contacted. Neither stability of preferences nor direction of change (more vs. less willing) varied by diagnostic group. Bivariate analyses revealed that participation in at least 1 ancillary research study was associated with an overall increase in willingness to be contacted. We conclude that a significant proportion of research-friendly individuals voice different sets of preferences with regard to the possibility of research participation when queried at different points in time. Amenability to participating in clinical research on AD is a relatively dynamic personal attribute that may be influenced by personal experience with research participation. This finding has relevance for the policy debate around research advance directives, an approach which assumes that preferences with regard to research participation are consistent over time.
Collapse
|
9
|
Bravo G, Arcand M, Blanchette D, Boire-Lavigne AM, Dubois MF, Guay M, Hottin P, Lane J, Lauzon J, Bellemare S. Promoting advance planning for health care and research among older adults: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Ethics 2012; 13:1. [PMID: 22221980 PMCID: PMC3328256 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-13-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2011] [Accepted: 01/05/2012] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Family members are often required to act as substitute decision-makers when health care or research participation decisions must be made for an incapacitated relative. Yet most families are unable to accurately predict older adult preferences regarding future health care and willingness to engage in research studies. Discussion and documentation of preferences could improve proxies' abilities to decide for their loved ones. This trial assesses the efficacy of an advance planning intervention in improving the accuracy of substitute decision-making and increasing the frequency of documented preferences for health care and research. It also investigates the financial impact on the healthcare system of improving substitute decision-making. Methods/Design Dyads (n = 240) comprising an older adult and his/her self-selected proxy are randomly allocated to the experimental or control group, after stratification for type of designated proxy and self-report of prior documentation of healthcare preferences. At baseline, clinical and research vignettes are used to elicit older adult preferences and assess the ability of their proxy to predict those preferences. Responses are elicited under four health states, ranging from the subject's current health state to severe dementia. For each state, we estimated the public costs of the healthcare services that would typically be provided to a patient under these scenarios. Experimental dyads are visited at home, twice, by a specially trained facilitator who communicates the dyad-specific results of the concordance assessment, helps older adults convey their wishes to their proxies, and offers assistance in completing a guide entitled My Preferences that we designed specifically for that purpose. In between these meetings, experimental dyads attend a group information session about My Preferences. Control dyads attend three monthly workshops aimed at promoting healthy behaviors. Concordance assessments are repeated at the end of the intervention and 6 months later to assess improvement in predictive accuracy and cost savings, if any. Copies of completed guides are made at the time of these assessments. Discussion This study will determine whether the tested intervention guides proxies in making decisions that concur with those of older adults, motivates the latter to record their wishes in writing, and yields savings for the healthcare system. Trial Registration ISRCTN89993391
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gina Bravo
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dubois J, Bante H, Hadley WB. Ethics in Psychiatric Research: A Review of 25 Years of NIH-funded Empirical Research Projects. AJOB PRIMARY RESEARCH 2011; 2:5-17. [PMID: 23259152 PMCID: PMC3524581 DOI: 10.1080/21507716.2011.631514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This paper reviews the past 25 years of empirical research funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) on matters of ethics in psychiatric research. METHODS: Using the NIH RePORTER and Medline databases, we identified 43 grants and 77 publications that involved the empirical study of a matter of ethics in research involving mental health service users. RESULTS: These articles provide original and useful information on important topics, most especially the capacity to consent and the voluntariness of consent. For example, participants who share a diagnosis vary widely in levels of cognitive impairment that correlate with decisional capacity, and capacity to consent can be enhanced easily using iterative consent processes. Few articles address matters of justice or benefits in research, particularly from the perspectives of participants. No articles address matters of privacy, confidentiality, or researcher professionalism. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the usefulness of data from the studies conducted to date, current research on research ethics in psychiatry does not adequately address the concerns of service users as expressed in recent publications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Dubois
- Saint Louis University - Gnaegi Center for Health Care Ethics, 221 North Grand Blvd, St. Louis, Missouri 63103,
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jones RW, Andrieu S, Knox S, Mackell J. Physicians and caregivers: ready and waiting for increased participation in clinical research. J Nutr Health Aging 2010; 14:563-8. [PMID: 20818472 DOI: 10.1007/s12603-010-0269-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Progressive development of pharmacotherapy for Alzheimer's disease (AD) as well as non-pharmacological treatments is critically dependent on the timely recruitment of appropriate subjects for clinical trials. Accordingly, the IMPACT survey sought to determine the level of awareness of clinical trials and the willingness to foster patient involvement/participation in research studies. IMPACT survey participants were recruited via the Internet in equal numbers from 5 European countries-France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom. During April and May 2009, 250 caregivers and 500 physicians who agreed to participate in this market-based survey completed a 30-minute Web-based questionnaire that included items concerning awareness of clinical research and willingness to facilitate participation of AD patients in such research. Awareness of local clinical trials amongst both caregivers (24% overall; range by country, 14% to 34%) and physicians (19% overall; range by country, 13% to 30%) was found to be low in all countries surveyed. In contrast, the willingness of physicians to refer patients to, and caregivers to support their participation in, clinical trials was extremely high (98% and 81%, respectively). These results strongly indicate that physicians and caregivers are ready and waiting to become more involved in clinical research. Initiatives to increase awareness of clinical trials amongst caregivers and physicians and to conduct clinical trials within the geographical area of as many potential participants as possible should result in much more effective patient recruitment to AD clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R W Jones
- RICE, Royal United Hospital, Combe Park, Bath, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mayo AM, Wallhagen MI. Considerations of Informed Consent and Decision-Making Competence in Older Adults with Cognitive Impairment. Res Gerontol Nurs 2009; 2:103-11. [DOI: 10.3928/19404921-20090401-08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
13
|
Willingness to participate in Alzheimer disease research and attitudes towards proxy-informed consent: results from the Health and Retirement Study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2009; 17:65-74. [PMID: 19092313 DOI: 10.1097/jgp.0b013e31818cd3d3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate public opinion about participation in Alzheimer disease (AD) research and willingness to have a proxy-informed consent. DESIGN Cross-sectional. SETTING A national survey of community-dwelling adults over the age of 50 and their spouse of any age. PARTICIPANTS The 2006 wave of the Health and Retirement Study (N = 1,517). MEASUREMENTS Willingness to participate in one of four possible research scenarios and to have a proxy-informed consent for AD research. RESULTS Overall, 65.8% agreed to participate in AD research and 70.7% agreed to proxy-informed consent. Relative to a minimal benefit and moderate risk scenario, participants were more likely to favor participation in a moderate benefit and minimal risk scenario and less likely to endorse a minimal benefit and severe risk scenario. Those agreeing to participate in the study were more likely to agree to proxy consent and to give leeway to a research proxy to go against their will. CONCLUSIONS Most participants view AD research favorably and are agreeable toward participating in such research as well as toward having a research proxy. Participants are able to distinguish between studies of different levels of benefit and risk. Nevertheless, over 50% agreed to a study of minimal benefit and severe risk. Researchers and clinicians should be aware that those less agreeable toward AD research are less interested in having a research proxy.
Collapse
|
14
|
Helmchen H. [Ethical questions in clinical research with the mentally ill]. DER NERVENARZT 2008; 79:1036-50. [PMID: 18633585 DOI: 10.1007/s00115-008-2523-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
The review deals with present problems of protecting mentally ill patients who are incompetent to give informed consent to participating in clinical research, and of assessment of the capacity to consent. 1. Clinical trials of drugs on efficacy and safety in incompetent patients are ethically justified and legally admissible if the investigational drug can be expected to exert a direct potential individual benefit and if such trials will be performed under defined criteria to protect these vulnerable patients. In Germany it is questionable how far these prescriptions of the German Drug Law (AMG) are transferable to other than drug research. 2. Research with no direct potential individual benefit or only a group-specific benefit in incompetent patients is controversially discussed. However, it may be ethically justified as an exception, and is in Germany legally admissible only in minors, but not in adults. 3. However, internationally there exists a wide range of legal regulations, terms, interpretations, and practices of research with vulnerable persons. In the past years a shift seems to have developed from normatively oriented discussions to more empirically based investigations. Especially vague but clinically relevant terms in protection declarations or guidelines have been better specified, put in concrete form by anchor examples, and empirically studied. 4. In general the criteria of protecting the dignity and, even if impaired, the autonomy of incompetent patients as subjects for research appear to guarantee a high standard of protection. However, the application of these criteria must be improved by practicable procedures. This is valid particularly for the assessment of the basic criterion whether a patient is capable of consenting or not. 5. Open Questions are formulated as need of research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Helmchen
- Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, CBF, Charite - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Eschenallee 3, 14050, Berlin, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Stocking CB, Hougham GW, Danner DD, Patterson MB, Whitehouse PJ, Sachs GA. Variable judgments of decisional capacity in cognitively impaired research subjects. J Am Geriatr Soc 2008; 56:1893-7. [PMID: 19054202 DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01922.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare assessments of the decisional capacity of cognitively impaired patients by research assistants (RAs) and by family caregiver/proxies and to determine whether either or both groups judge capacity differently depending on the specific (hypothetical) research enrollment decision being made. DESIGN Cross-sectional. SETTING Three clinics, one each in Ohio, Kentucky, and Illinois. PARTICIPANTS One hundred forty-nine patients with established dementia diagnoses and their caregiver/proxies. MEASUREMENTS As part of a longer interview, patients were asked about future enrollment in five hypothetical research projects with varying risks and benefits. After patients reported each decision and reasons for that decision, RAs (using Applebaum and Grisso's four standards) indicated whether the patients were competent to make that decision on their own. In separate interviews, caregiver/proxies were asked for a similar appraisal based on life experience with the patient. RA and proxy judgments were compared. RESULTS Capacity judgments by RAs and by caregiver/proxies differed according to specific project for most patients. Agreement between RA and caregiver/proxy judgments varied according to project, but agreement was only fair when tested using kappa (range in data 0.21-0.39). Caregiver/proxies appraised 50 patients as competent for all decisions, and RAs assessed 47 as so. Of these, only 24 were the same patients. CONCLUSION If capacity were assessed anew for each enrollment decision, more potential participants could maintain authority in making those decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carol B Stocking
- Department of Medicine, Section of Geriatrics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|