1
|
Wang T, Remberger M, Björklund A, Watz E. The impact of transportation time on apoptosis in allogeneic stem cell grafts and the clinical outcome in malignant patients with unrelated donors. Cytotherapy 2022; 24:508-515. [PMID: 35210189 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2021.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Revised: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The quality of cells in peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) grafts is important for allogeneic stem cell transplantation outcome. The viability of PBSC grafts may decrease during transportation time between donor and transplant center. We hypothesize that the graft viability based on apoptosis and necrosis in the graft may better reflect graft quality and clinical outcome. METHODS PBSC graft viability from unrelated donors was analyzed in 91 patients. Viable cells were defined as 7-aminoactinomycin D- and Annexin V-negative. The clinical outcome, including survival, transplant-related mortality and graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), was correlated to graft viability. RESULTS Grafts transported for 1 day had a median viability of 86.4% (range 63.8 to 98.9%), and grafts transported for 2 days had median viability of 83.2% (range 52.8% to 96.2%) (P = .003). Grafts were divided into two groups based on the median graft viability of 85.1%. Patients who received low viability grafts had lower 1-year survival of 63.7% compared with 88.9% for those who received high viability grafts (P = .007). In the multivariate analysis, transplant-related mortality (TRM) was higher in the low viability group (P = .03), whereas overall survival was not significantly associated with graft viability. The incidence of acute GvHD grade II to IV, chronic GvHD and relapse risk remained comparable between the groups. CONCLUSION Low graft viability was an independent predictor of 1-year survival and TRM after adjusting for multiple confounders. Better graft quality markers are important for the detection of clinically important variations in the stem cell graft.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tengyu Wang
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Mats Remberger
- Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University and KFUE, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Andreas Björklund
- Unit for Cell Therapy and Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation (CAST), Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Emma Watz
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
GPR4 signaling is essential for the promotion of acid-mediated angiogenic capacity of endothelial progenitor cells by activating STAT3/VEGFA pathway in patients with coronary artery disease. Stem Cell Res Ther 2021; 12:149. [PMID: 33632325 PMCID: PMC7905863 DOI: 10.1186/s13287-021-02221-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) are characterized by a decline in vascular regeneration, which is related to the dysfunction of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs). G-protein-coupled receptor 4 (GPR4) is a proton-sensing G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that contributes to neovascularization in acidic microenvironments. However, the role of GPR4 in regulating the angiogenic capacity of EPCs from CAD patients in response to acidity generated in ischemic tissue remains completely unclear. METHODS The angiogenic capacity of EPCs collected from CAD patients and healthy subjects was evaluated in different pH environments. The GPR4 function of regulating EPC-mediated angiogenesis was analyzed both in vitro and in vivo. The downstream mechanisms were further investigated by genetic overexpression and inhibition. RESULTS Acidic environment prestimulation significantly enhanced the angiogenic capacity of EPCs from the non-CAD group both in vivo and in vitro, while the same treatment yielded the opposite result in the CAD group. Among the four canonical proton-sensing GPCRs, GPR4 displays the highest expression in EPCs. The expression of GRP4 was markedly lower in EPCs from CAD patients than in EPCs from non-CAD individuals independent of acid stimulation. The siRNA-mediated knockdown of GPR4 with subsequent decreased phosphorylation of STAT3 mimicked the impaired function of EPCs from CAD patients at pH 6.4 but not at pH 7.4. Elevating GPR4 expression restored the neovessel formation mediated by EPCs from CAD patients in an acidic environment by activating STAT3/VEGFA signaling. Moreover, the beneficial impact of GPR4 upregulation on EPC-mediated angiogenic capacity was abrogated by blockade of the STAT3/VEGFA signaling pathway. CONCLUSIONS Our present study demonstrated for the first time that loss of GPR4 is responsible for the decline in proton sensing and angiogenic capacity of EPCs from CAD patients. Augmentation of GPR4 expression promotes the neovessel formation of EPCs by activating STAT3/VEGF signaling. This finding implicates GPR4 as a potential therapeutic target for CAD characterized by impaired neovascularization in ischemic tissues.
Collapse
|
3
|
Moldenhauer LM, Cockshell MP, Frost L, Parham KA, Tvorogov D, Tan LY, Ebert LM, Tooley K, Worthley S, Lopez AF, Bonder CS. Interleukin-3 greatly expands non-adherent endothelial forming cells with pro-angiogenic properties. Stem Cell Res 2015; 14:380-95. [PMID: 25900163 DOI: 10.1016/j.scr.2015.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2014] [Revised: 03/25/2015] [Accepted: 04/01/2015] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) provide revascularisation for cardiovascular disease and the expansion of these cells opens up the possibility of their use as a cell therapy. Herein we show that interleukin-3 (IL3) strongly expands a population of human non-adherent endothelial forming cells (EXnaEFCs) with low immunogenicity as well as pro-angiogenic capabilities in vivo, making their therapeutic utilisation a realistic option. Non-adherent CD133(+) EFCs isolated from human umbilical cord blood and cultured under different conditions were maximally expanded by day 12 in the presence of IL3 at which time a 350-fold increase in cell number was obtained. Cell surface marker phenotyping confirmed expression of the hematopoietic progenitor cell markers CD133, CD117 and CD34, vascular cell markers VEGFR2 and CD31, dim expression of CD45 and absence of myeloid markers CD14 and CD11b. Functional experiments revealed that EXnaEFCs exhibited classical properties of endothelial cells (ECs), namely binding of Ulex europaeus lectin, up-take of acetylated-low density lipoprotein and contribution to EC tube formation in vitro. These EXnaEFCs demonstrated a pro-angiogenic phenotype within two independent in vivo rodent models. Firstly, a Matrigel plug assay showed increased vascularisation in mice. Secondly, a rat model of acute myocardial infarction demonstrated reduced heart damage as determined by lower levels of serum creatinine and a modest increase in heart functionality. Taken together, these studies show IL3 as a potent growth factor for human CD133(+) cell expansion with clear pro-angiogenic properties (in vitro and in vivo) and thus may provide clinical utility for humans in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lachlan M Moldenhauer
- Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology and University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Co-operative Research Centre for Biomarker Translation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michaelia P Cockshell
- Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology and University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Co-operative Research Centre for Biomarker Translation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lachlan Frost
- School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Kate A Parham
- Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology and University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Denis Tvorogov
- Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology and University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Lih Y Tan
- Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology and University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Lisa M Ebert
- Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology and University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Katie Tooley
- Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology and University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Co-operative Research Centre for Biomarker Translation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stephen Worthley
- School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Centre for Stem Cell Research, Robinson Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Angel F Lopez
- Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology and University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Co-operative Research Centre for Biomarker Translation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Claudine S Bonder
- Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology and University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Co-operative Research Centre for Biomarker Translation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Centre for Stem Cell Research, Robinson Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Peplow PV. Growth factor- and cytokine-stimulated endothelial progenitor cells in post-ischemic cerebral neovascularization. Neural Regen Res 2014; 9:1425-9. [PMID: 25317152 PMCID: PMC4192942 DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.139457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/20/2014] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Endothelial progenitor cells are resident in the bone marrow blood sinusoids and circulate in the peripheral circulation. They mobilize from the bone marrow after vascular injury and home to the site of injury where they differentiate into endothelial cells. Activation and mobilization of endothelial progenitor cells from the bone marrow is induced via the production and release of endothelial progenitor cell-activating factors and includes specific growth factors and cytokines in response to peripheral tissue hypoxia such as after acute ischemic stroke or trauma. Endothelial progenitor cells migrate and home to specific sites following ischemic stroke via growth factor/cytokine gradients. Some growth factors are less stable under acidic conditions of tissue ischemia, and synthetic analogues that are stable at low pH may provide a more effective therapeutic approach for inducing endothelial progenitor cell mobilization and promoting cerebral neovascularization following ischemic stroke.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip V Peplow
- Department of Anatomy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Peplow PV. Influence of growth factors and cytokines on angiogenic function of endothelial progenitor cells: a review of in vitro human studies. Growth Factors 2014; 32:83-116. [PMID: 24712317 DOI: 10.3109/08977194.2014.904300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Growth factors and cytokines released at sites of injury and inflammation play an important role in stimulating endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) migration to these sites. A comparative analysis of the literature shows under neutral in vitro conditions (pH 7.4), several growth factors and cytokines influenced favorably indices of EPC angiogenic function. They included SDF-1, VEGF, PlGF, FGF-2, NGF and IL-1β. Others, e.g. TNF-α, have an unfavorable influence. SDF-1 and VEGF in combination increased chemotactic cell migration and reduced apoptosis caused by serum starvation. Under acidic conditions (pH 6.5), the biological activity of certain growth factors may be impaired, although TPO, SCF and IL-3 were each able to rescue EPCs from acidic exposure apoptosis, a combination of these three factors stimulated cell proliferation and prevented apoptosis. Possible combinations of growth factors and cytokines together with EPC transplantation may provide for a greater extent of vessel repair and new vessel formation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip V Peplow
- Department of Anatomy, University of Otago , Dunedin , New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mena HA, Lokajczyk A, Dizier B, Strier SE, Voto LS, Boisson-Vidal C, Schattner M, Negrotto S. Acidic preconditioning improves the proangiogenic responses of endothelial colony forming cells. Angiogenesis 2014; 17:867-79. [DOI: 10.1007/s10456-014-9434-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2014] [Accepted: 05/13/2014] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|