Practice of ABO antibody titration in a transplant center: From tube method to manual gel column testing to automated column agglutination technology

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

High-quality ABO antibody titre testing is required for ABO-incompatible haematopoietic stem cell transplantation and kidney transplantation. To assess the feasibility of automated ABO titration as an alternative to manual and semi-automatic titration during the peri-transplant period, a comparative study was conducted internally in a transfusion medicine laboratory.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was performed in two stages. Firstly, the differences in anti-A/B detecting using conventional tube test (CTT) and manual column agglutination technology (CAT) were compared in group O pregnant women. Then, manual and automated CAT were applied to simultaneously detect ABO antibody levels in non-AB-group adult haematological oncology patients.

RESULTS

In the first stage, four groups of 192 comparable results were generated from 48 subjects, which showed a high correlation between CTT and manual CAT (p < 0.001). However, the detection sensitivity of the latter was at least 1 fold higher dilution than that of the former. Fifty-six patients were tested in the second stage by simultaneous manual and automated CAT, and the paired titers differed within an acceptable range (±1 fold dilution). However, the concordance was slightly higher in group IgM (85.4%) than in group IgG (80.5%). Blood group specificity of ABO titers was also observed in this population, and no association between titers and other factors was found.

CONCLUSION

Automated CAT standardises ABO titre testing and saves labor costs, although manual review of weak positive reactions is still necessary. Due to the blood group specificity of ABO antibodies, special attention should be paid to the quality control and clinical relevance of titre testing for group O recipients in ABO-mismatched transplantation.

The impact of infused red blood cell volume on major and bidirectional ABO-mismatched bone marrow transplantation

BACKGROUND AIMS

ABO incompatibility does not hinder bone marrow transplantation (BMT), but it has been associated with worse outcomes and additional adverse events. This study aimed to verify the impact of incompatible red blood cells (iRBCs) in allogeneic BMT and to determine a safe number of iRBCs to be infused.

METHODS

We compared ABO-incompatible (iABO) allogeneic BMT (n = 42) with ABO-compatible allogeneic BMT (n = 44) and evaluated the impact of the number of infused iRBCs on outcomes and adverse events.

RESULTS

The iABO patients demonstrated delayed time to transfusion independence at 30 days and 60 days, increased requirement for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion and greater hemolysis signals and incidence of pure red cell aplasia. Neutrophil/platelet engraftment, length of hospitalization post-transplant, platelet units required, graft-versus-host disease occurrence and overall survival were similar in both groups. Patients in the iABO group received 1.03 × 1010 iRBCs/kg (range, 0.36-3.88). Infusion of iRBCs >1.0 × 1010 /kg was related to graft failure or death before neutrophil engraftment or platelet engraftment or both as well as increased plasma requirement and increased creatinine. Our results also suggest that antibody titers impact the transplantation scenario.

CONCLUSIONS

The iABO transplantation showed some unfavorable outcomes. It is important to monitor the value of iRBCs to be infused, considering the recipient antibody titers. We propose using the number of iRBCs (iRBCs/kg) as a dose parameter with regard to infused iRBCs. Further studies are necessary to clarify the maximum safe number of iRBCs in iABO transplants.

Immuno-Hematologic Complexity of ABO-Incompatible Allogeneic HSC Transplantation

ABO incompatibility is not considered a contraindication for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Approximately 30% of transplants from related donors and up to 50% of transplants from unrelated donors are ABO incompatible. Immuno-hematologic investigations allow to estimate donor/recipient ABO mismatch and anti-A/B isohemagglutinin (IHA) titration in the pre-HSCT phase. Immediate hemolysis or delayed complications (passenger lymphocyte syndrome and pure red cell aplasia) can occur post HSCT. Some preventive measures take into consideration either decision-making algorithms based on the recipient's IHA titration or clinical protocols for the removal/reduction of IHAs through plasma exchange or immunoadsorption procedures. Product manipulation through red blood cell (RBC) and/or plasma depletion can also be taken into account. Currently, the best approach in the management of ABO-incompatible transplant is not defined in expert consensus documents or with solid evidence. In addition, the methods for IHA titration are not standardized. A transfusion strategy must consider both the donor's and recipient's blood group systems until the RBC engraftment catches on and ABO conversion (forward and reverse typing) is confirmed on two consecutive and independent samples. Therefore, ABO incompatibility in HSCT represents a demanding immuno-hematologic challenge and requires all necessary preventive measures, including the appropriate selection of ABO blood components for transfusion.

Comparison of Haemonetics Cell Saver 5+ and manual density separation for optimum depletion of red blood cells and preservation of CD34+ cells in major ABO-incompatible bone marrow grafts

BACKGROUND AIMS

The current approach for preventing hemolysis of red blood cells (RBCs) in major ABO-incompatible bone marrow (BM) grafts after infusion is to deplete RBCs from BM products before transplantation. Traditionally, manual density separation (MDS) using Ficoll-Hypaque (Cytiva Sweden AB, Uppsala, Sweden has been used to accomplish RBC depletion. This process yields good CD34+ cell recovery, but it requires open manipulation and is labor-intensive and time-consuming. We hypothesized that an alternative automated method using Haemonetics Cell Saver 5+ (Haemonetics Corporation, Boston, MA, USA) would offer equivalent RBC depletion and CD34+ cell recovery. Small marrow volumes from pediatric donors can be processed using Cell Saver (CS) without adding the third-party RBCs necessary for other automated methods.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis comprised data from 58 allogeneic BM grafts. RBC depletion and CD34+ cell recovery from BM using MDS (35 grafts) were compared with CS (14 grafts). Nine products underwent RBC depletion using CS with Ficoll (CS-F) when RBC volume was less than 125 mL.

RESULTS

Linear regression analysis of log transformation of CD34+ cell recovery adjusted for log transformation of both baseline CD34+ cell content and baseline total volume showed no significant difference between MDS and CS (estimated coefficient, -0.121, P = 0.096). All products contained an RBC volume of less than 0.25 mL/kg post-processing. CD34+ cell recovery with CS-F was comparable to MDS and CS and suitable for pediatric recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

We provide evidence that an automated method using Haemonetics Cell Saver 5+ achieves RBC depletion and CD34+ cell recovery comparable to MDS when adjusting for baseline factors.

Passenger Lymphocyte Syndrome and Autoimmune Hypothyroidism Following Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

We present the case of a 24-year-old male, who received a minor ABO-incompatible allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT, blood group O⁺ ⟶ A⁺) from an HLA-matched unrelated female donor, as consolidation therapy for relapsed precursor-B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The donor had a known history of Hashimoto's thyroiditis before HSCT. At day +10 posttransplant, the patient developed severe hemolysis, which required emergent red blood cell exchange. Additionally, about a year posttransplant, he had circulating antithyroglobulin antibodies, decreased free-T4 (fT4) and increased serum thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH). The potential causes of the posttransplant hemolytic episode and hypothyroidism are discussed. While the hemolysis was worsened by the transfusion of A red blood cells (RBCs) in the context of passenger lymphocyte syndrome, the thyroid dysfunction might be explained by an autoimmune disease transferred from the donor. The case highlights the possibility of several non-relapse-related complications of HSCT occurring in the same patient. It is critical that such adverse outcomes are distinguished from classical graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) for adequate recipient counseling, posttransplant screening, and prompt treatment.

Low rates of anti-recipient isohemagglutinins in ABO incompatible hematopoietic stem cell transplants

INTRODUCTION

Isohemagglutinins occur naturally and form in an 'opposite' (antigen-negative) pattern to a patient's ABO blood type. Patients undergoing minor and bidirectional ABO incompatible hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) may demonstrate detectable antibodies against their native blood type. In this study, we sought to characterize the rates of such antibody formation and evaluate the clinical significance of our findings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An internal database of HSCT patients at an academic medical center was queried for ABO incompatible transplant patients from 2009-2019. Serum typing results, clinical histories, and laboratory data were compiled and reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 182 minor and bidirectional ABO incompatible HSCT patients were identified. Anti-recipient isohemagglutinins were found in 9% (16/182) of the HSCT patients. The rate was higher in patients with minor incompatibility (12%: 15/127) versus bidirectional ABO incompatibility (2%: 1/55) (p = 0.04). No anti-recipient isohemagglutinins were identified in umbilical cord HSCT patients (0%: 0/7). Serologic agglutination reactions of recipient isohemagglutinins were overall mostly weak (13/16 weak + to 1+). There was a trend towards a higher rate of acute graft-versus-host-disease in patients with anti-recipient isohemagglutinins compared to those without (75% vs. 53%; p = 0.12), though not statistically significant. Rates of alloimmunization to minor red cell antigens were similar between the two groups. Few patients showed laboratory evidence of hemolysis at 12 months follow up.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Anti-recipient isohemagglutinins occur at low rates in ABO incompatible HSCT and are significantly more common in minor ABO incompatible transplant compared to bidirectional transplants. Larger cohort studies are needed to better understand the relationship between anti-recipient isohemagglutinins and HSCT outcomes.

Effects of ABO incompatibility on the outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

ABO compatibility between donor and recipient is no necessary in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT). Incompatible transplantations can be divided into three groups based on the donor and recipient blood groups. The influence of each kind of incompatibilities on the outcome of patients does not seem to be consistent. This study aimed to investigate the outcome of AHSCT patients focusing on compatibility statues.

METHOD

This retrospective study was conducted on 186 patients who underwent first AHSCT, includes 108 identical, 38 minor, 32 major and eight bidirectionalABO incompatible recipients. Comparative analysis was performed for common clinical transplantation outcomes.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant association betweenABO incompatibility and graft-versus-host disease, WBC or platelet engraftment, and transfusion requirement. WBC engraftment rate was significantly lower in minor-incompatible patients. Furthermore, total and direct bilirubin which (the hemolysis biomarkers) were considerably higher in the bidirectional incompatible group, compared to the other patients.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that theABO incompatibility might be an effective factor in engraftment time and laboratory hemolysis. Elucidating the impact of ABO incompatibility on the clinical outcome of patients warrants an extended and deep investigation in a large-scale study with comprehensive variables such as survival, relapse, and other complication of transplantation.

Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice - Evidence-Based Approach from the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: The Eighth Special Issue

The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Journal of Clinical Apheresis (JCA) Special Issue Writing Committee is charged with reviewing, updating and categorizing indications for the evidence-based use of therapeutic apheresis (TA) in human disease. Since the 2007 JCA Special Issue (Fourth Edition), the committee has incorporated systematic review and evidence-based approaches in the grading and categorization of apheresis indications. This Eighth Edition of the JCA Special Issue continues to maintain this methodology and rigor in order to make recommendations on the use of apheresis in a wide variety of diseases/conditions. The JCA Eighth Edition, like its predecessor, continues to apply the category and grading system definitions in fact sheets. The general layout and concept of a fact sheet that was introduced in the Fourth Edition, has largely been maintained in this edition. Each fact sheet succinctly summarizes the evidence for the use of TA in a specific disease entity or medical condition. The Eighth Edition comprises 84 fact sheets for relevant diseases and medical conditions, with 157 graded and categorized indications and/or TA modalities. The Eighth Edition of the JCA Special Issue seeks to continue to serve as a key resource that guides the utilization of TA in the treatment of human disease.

ABO-mismatched marrow processing for transplantation: Comparative results of 80 procedures performed with Cobe Spectra and Spectra Optia

BACKGROUND

removal of incompatible red blood cells (RBCs) or plasma is usually required to avoid hemolysis during infusion of ABO incompatible bone marrow (BM) allogeneic transplants. This process often involves separation of buffy coat (BC) by centrifugation in automated devices. We have evaluated the Spectra Optia™ (Optia) apheresis system to determine its effectiveness in BC concentration, volume reduction and RBCs depletion of ABO-incompatible BM compared with our previous method using Cobe Spectra™ (Cobe).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

28 processes were performed with Optia and 52 with Cobe. We compared volume reduction, RBCs depletion, and recovery of total nucleated cells (TNCs), mononuclear cells (MNCs), CD34+ and CD3+ cells in the final product. Hematopoietic engraftment was ascertained. We used Saphiro-Wilks and Kolmorgorov- Smirnov tests to test normality and Mann-Whitney's U test to compare means between both groups.

RESULTS

We found statistically significant differences favoring Optia versus Cobe in TNCs recovery (62% vs. 37%), CD34+ cell recovery (98 vs 84%), volume reduction (91 vs 84%), and RBCs depletion (99 vs. 97%), but not in processing time or time to engraftment.

CONCLUSION

Optia achieves high RBCs and volume depletion of BM, while providing excellent CD34+ recovery in clinical routine. Some parameters compare favorably with Cobe Spectra.

Infusion hemolysis after pediatric major ABO-mismatched bone marrow transplant: Comparison of two red blood cell depletion techniques

BACKGROUND

During major ABO-mismatched bone marrow transplant (BMT), the infusion of incompatible red blood cells (RBCs) that are present in the bone marrow graft can cause adverse events from hemolysis. RBC depletion of the bone marrow graft can decrease this risk, but the optimal method to prevent hemolysis is unclear.

PROCEDURE

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent major ABO-mismatched BMT at a pediatric center and had RBC depletion with either hydroxyethyl starch (HES) sedimentation or Ficoll density gradient separation. Postinfusion hemoglobinuria and creatinine values were compared.

RESULTS

Between 2002 and 2016, 37 patients received HES-treated and 16 patients received Ficoll-treated major ABO-mismatched bone marrow grafts. The median residual volume of RBCs was significantly greater with HES-treated grafts (HES 21.0 ml vs. Ficoll 1.4 ml, P < 0.0001). Patients who received HES-treated grafts had a higher prevalence of postinfusion hemoglobinuria (HES 57% vs. Ficoll 6%, P = 0.0009), but renal impairment was rare. Considering only HES-treated grafts, the volume of RBCs was not associated with either postinfusion hemoglobinuria or a creatinine increase.

CONCLUSIONS

Ficoll density gradient separation achieves smaller RBC volumes and less postinfusion hemoglobinuria than HES sedimentation, but both can prevent significant hemolysis. Further studies are needed to determine the residual incompatible RBC volume threshold in major ABO-mismatched BMT.

Erythrocyte depletion from bone marrow: performance evaluation after 50 clinical-scale depletions with Spectra Optia BMC

BACKGROUND

Red blood cell (RBC) depletion is a standard graft manipulation technique for ABO-incompatible bone marrow (BM) transplants. The BM processing module for Spectra Optia, "BMC", was previously introduced. We here report the largest series to date of routine quality data after performing 50 clinical-scale RBC-depletions.

METHODS

Fifty successive RBC-depletions from autologous (n = 5) and allogeneic (n = 45) BM transplants were performed with the Spectra Optia BMC apheresis suite. Product quality was assessed before and after processing for volume, RBC and leukocyte content; RBC-depletion and stem cell (CD34+ cells) recovery was calculated there from. Clinical engraftment data were collected from 26/45 allogeneic recipients.

RESULTS

Median RBC removal was 98.2% (range 90.8-99.1%), median CD34+ cell recovery was 93.6%, minimum recovery being 72%, total product volume was reduced to 7.5% (range 4.7-23.0%). Products engrafted with expected probability and kinetics. Performance indicators were stable over time.

DISCUSSION

Spectra Optia BMC is a robust and efficient technology for RBC-depletion and volume reduction of BM, providing near-complete RBC removal and excellent CD34+ cell recovery.

Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice-Evidence-Based Approach from the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: The Seventh Special Issue

The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Journal of Clinical Apheresis (JCA) Special Issue Writing Committee is charged with reviewing, updating, and categorizing indications for the evidence-based use of therapeutic apheresis in human disease. Since the 2007 JCA Special Issue (Fourth Edition), the Committee has incorporated systematic review and evidence-based approaches in the grading and categorization of apheresis indications. This Seventh Edition of the JCA Special Issue continues to maintain this methodology and rigor to make recommendations on the use of apheresis in a wide variety of diseases/conditions. The JCA Seventh Edition, like its predecessor, has consistently applied the category and grading system definitions in the fact sheets. The general layout and concept of a fact sheet that was used since the fourth edition has largely been maintained in this edition. Each fact sheet succinctly summarizes the evidence for the use of therapeutic apheresis in a specific disease entity. The Seventh Edition discusses 87 fact sheets (14 new fact sheets since the Sixth Edition) for therapeutic apheresis diseases and medical conditions, with 179 indications, which are separately graded and categorized within the listed fact sheets. Several diseases that are Category IV which have been described in detail in previous editions and do not have significant new evidence since the last publication are summarized in a separate table. The Seventh Edition of the JCA Special Issue serves as a key resource that guides the utilization of therapeutic apheresis in the treatment of human disease. J. Clin. Apheresis 31:149-162, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

ABO blood group antigen mismatch has an impact on outcome after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

ABO blood group antigen incompatibility (ABO mismatch) is not an obstacle to allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). However, the impact on clinical outcome after allo-SCT remains controversial. We analyzed 512 patients after allogeneic peripheral blood SCT (allo-PBSCT) for an association of ABO mismatch with transfusion requirements, myeloid and platelet engraftment, the incidence of GvHD, relapse, transplant-related mortality (TRM), and overall survival (OS). A total of 260 patients underwent ABO-mismatched transplantation and the control group consisted of 252 patients with ABO-matched allo-PBSCT. We found a significant association between major-0 ABO mismatch (group 0 recipient/group A, B, or AB donor) and increased red blood cell (RBC) and platelet transfusion requirements (both P<.001) as well as delayed platelet engraftment (P<.001). Minor-A (group A recipient/group 0 donor) and minor-AB (group AB recipient/group 0, A, or B donor) ABO mismatch was significantly associated with an increased TRM after allo-PBSCT (P=.001 and P=.02). In multivariate analysis performed using Cox regression, minor ABO mismatch appeared as independent risk factor for TRM after allo-PBSCT. No association was found for ABO mismatch with the incidence of GvHD, relapse, and OS. Our results suggest that ABO blood group mismatch has a significant impact on the outcome and that minor-A and minor-AB ABO mismatch represents a risk factor for increased TRM after allo-PBSCT.

Complex Transfusion Issues in Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Advances in the fields of pediatric transfusion medicine and hematopoietic stem cell transplant have resulted in improved outcomes but also present new questions for research. The diagnostic capabilities involved in transfusion medicine have improved in recent times, now including methods for determination of red blood cell minor antigens, detection of anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies, and noninvasive iron quantification. At the same time, transplants are being performed for more indications including nonmalignant disease and with less intense conditioning regimens that allow some recipient blood cells to persist after transplant. We are therefore faced with new opportunities to understand the implications of transfusion medicine testing and to develop data-driven guidelines relevant to the current-day approach to transfusion and transplantation.

An update on ABO incompatible hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation

Hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) transplantation has long been established as the optimal treatment for many hematologic malignancies. In the setting of allogenic HLA matched HPC transplantation, greater than 50% of unrelated donors and 30% of related donors demonstrate some degree of ABO incompatibility (ABOi), which is classified in one of three ways: major, minor, or bidirectional. Major ABOi refers to the presence of recipient isoagglutinins against the donor's A and/or B antigen. Minor ABOi occurs when the HPC product contains the isoagglutinins targeting the recipient's A and/or B antigen. Bidirectional refers to the presence of both major and minor ABOi. Major adverse events associated with ABOi HPC transplantation includes acute and delayed hemolysis, pure red cell aplasia, and delayed engraftment. ABOi HPC transplantation poses a unique challenge to the clinical transplantation unit, the HPC processing lab, and the transfusion medicine service. Therefore, it is essential that these services actively communicate with one another to ensure patient safety. This review will attempt to globally address the challenges related to ABOi HPC transplantation, with an increased focus on aspects related to the laboratory and transfusion medicine services.

Clinico-serologic co-relation in bi-directional ABO incompatible hemopoietic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

The ABO blood group system is of prime significance in red cell transfusion and organ transplantation. However, ABO compatibility is not critical in allogenic hemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and approximately 40-50% of hemopoietic stem cell transplants are ABO incompatible. This incompatibility may be major, minor or bi-directional. Though there are descriptions of transfusion practice and protocols in ABO incompatible HSCT, there are considerable variations and transfusion support in these patients can be very challenging.

AIMS

The immunohematologic observations in two cases of bi-directional ABO incompatible HSCT have been described, and clinico-serologic correlation has been attempted.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In both cases, peripheral blood stem cell harvests were obtained using the Cobe spectra cell separator. Immunohematologic assessments in the donor and recipient were done as a part of pre HSCT evaluation. Both the standard tube technique and column agglutination method (Ortho Biovue Micro Bead System) was used. Antibody screen was done by column agglutination method using three cell panel (Surgiscreen cells). Isoagglutinin titration was done by the master dilution method and standard validated techniques were used.

RESULTS

The pattern of laboratory findings in the two cases was different and so were the clinical outcomes. Although there was early engraftment in the first case, the second case developed pure red cell aplasia and this was well-reflected in the immunohematologic assessments.

CONCLUSION

Immunohematologic assessment correlated well with the clinical picture and could be used to predict clinical outcome and onset of complications in ABO incompatible HSCT.

Transfusion support issues in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation require extensive transfusion support until red blood cell and platelet engraftment occurs. Rare but predictable complications may arise when the transplanted stem cells are incompatible with the native ABO type of the patient. Immediate and delayed hemolysis is often seen.

METHODS

A literature review was performed and the results from peer-reviewed papers that contained reproducible findings were integrated.

RESULTS

A strong body of clinical evidence has developed around the common complications experienced with ABO-incompatible hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. These complications are discussed and the underlying pathophysiology is explained. General treatment options and guidelines are enumerated.

CONCLUSIONS

ABO-incompatible hematopoietic stem cell transplantations are frequently performed. Immune-related hemolysis is a commonly encountered complication; therefore, health care professionals must recognize the signs of immune-mediated hemolysis and understand the various etiologies that may drive the process.

Micro gel column technique is fit for detecting mixed fields post ABO incompatible hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

How to choose suitable serologic method for assessment of the actual stages of ABO chimera is more important to establish transfusion strategy for patients post-ABO incompatible hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. We reported ABO phenotypes of a patient post-ABO minor incompatible hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from 1+ weak agglutination by tube method was obviously reaffirmed to mixed fields with 4+ positive reaction by micro gel column card. Hence, blood bank technologists must continually work together with hematologist to establish appropriate transfusion strategy, and micro gel column technique can be more appropriate for detecting mixed fields during the whole period of transplantation.

Primary graft failure after myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for hematologic malignancies

Clinical outcomes after primary graft failure (PGF) remain poor. Here we present a large retrospective analysis (n=23,272) which investigates means to prevent PGF and early detection of patients at high risk. In patients with hematologic malignancies, who underwent their first myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, PGF was reported in 1,278 (5.5%), and there was a marked difference in PGFs using peripheral blood stem cell compared to bone marrow grafts (2.5 vs. 7.3%; P<0.001). A 4-fold increase of PGF was observed in myeloproliferative disorders compared to acute leukemia (P<0.001). Other risk factors for PGF included recipient age below 30, HLA-mismatch, male recipients of female donor grafts, ABO-incompatibility, busulfan/cyclophosphamide conditioning, and cryopreservation. In bone marrow transplants, total nucleated cell doses ≤2.4 × 10⁸/kg were associated with PGF (OR 1.39; P<0.001). The use of tacrolimus-based immunosuppression and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor were associated with decreased PGF risk. These data, allow clinicians to do more informed choices with respect to graft source, donor selection, conditioning and immunosuppressive regimens to reduce the risk of PGF. Moreover, a novel risk score determined on day 21 post-transplant may provide the rationale for an early request for additional hematopoietic stem cells.

Red blood cell depletion from bone marrow and peripheral blood buffy coat: a comparison of two new and three established technologies

BACKGROUND

Red blood cell (RBC) depletion is a standard technique for preparation of ABO-incompatible bone marrow transplants (BMTs). Density centrifugation or apheresis are used successfully at clinical scale. The advent of a bone marrow (BM) processing module for the Spectra Optia (Terumo BCT) provided the initiative to formally compare our standard technology, the COBE2991 (Ficoll, manual, "C") with the Spectra Optia BMP (apheresis, semiautomatic, "O"), the Sepax II NeatCell (Ficoll, automatic, "S"), the Miltenyi CliniMACS Prodigy density gradient separation system (Ficoll, automatic, "P"), and manual Ficoll ("M"). C and O handle larger product volumes than S, P, and M.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Technologies were assessed for RBC depletion, target cell (mononuclear cells [MNCs] for buffy coats [BCs], CD34+ cells for BM) recovery, and cost/labor. BC pools were simultaneously purged with C, O, S, and P; five to 18 BM samples were sequentially processed with C, O, S, and M.

RESULTS

Mean RBC removal with C was 97% (BCs) or 92% (BM). From both products, O removed 97%, and P, S, and M removed 99% of RBCs. MNC recovery from BC (98% C, 97% O, 65% P, 74% S) or CD34+ cell recovery from BM (92% C, 90% O, 67% S, 70% M) were best with C and O. Polymorphonuclear cells (PMNs) were depleted from BCs by P, S, and C, while O recovered 50% of PMNs. Time savings compared to C or M for all tested technologies are considerable.

CONCLUSION

All methods are in principle suitable and can be selected based on sample volume, available technology, and desired product specifications beyond RBC depletion and MNC and/or CD34+ cell recovery.

Major ABO incompatible BMT in children: determining what residual volume of donor red cells can safely be infused following red cell depletion

Major ABO incompatible BM transplantation carries a risk of acute haemolysis. Red cell depletion reduces this risk but not all incompatible RBC (iRBCs) are removed and in children the residual volume can be significant relative to body weight. We sought to determine the volume of iRBCs that can be safely given to children. All patients receiving fresh BM from a donor with a major ABO blood group mismatch between January 2000 and July 2013 at the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, were included. Seventy-eight patients were identified. The median volume of iRBCs transfused was 1.6 mL/kg (range 0.1-10.6 mL/kg). Thirty-five patients had minor haemolytic events and five patients had clinically significant adverse events. Two patients, who received 3.66 and 3.9 mL iRBCs/kg, developed renal impairment and in one case hypoxia and hyperbilirubinaemia. One patient had mild hypotension that resolved with i.v. fluid. Two patients developed hypotension secondary to sepsis and unrelated to BM infusion. Although signs of haemolysis occur, with appropriate hydration and monitoring of renal function, clinically significant adverse events related to the infusion of ABO incompatible BM are rare, and, in this study, were only seen in patients receiving >3 mL/kg of iRBCs per kg.

Management of hemolytic anemia following allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Hemolytic anemia (HA) is a frequent condition with variable pathophysiology. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is unique because it is performed across the ABO blood group barrier. Thereby, there is a transfer of plasma, red blood cells, and immunocompetent cells from the donor to the recipient, possibly leading to HA, due to red blood cell incompatibility. The underlying disease, drugs (particularly those used for conditioning and immunosuppressants), infections, graft-versus-host disease, and autoimmune diseases may all contribute to the clinical and laboratory picture of HA. Additionally, transplantation-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA) may occur and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. This review highlights the current knowledge on HA after allogeneic HSCT, particularly due to ABO incompatibility. We follow the timeline of the transplantation process and discuss investigations, differential diagnosis, and prophylactic measures including graft processing to avoid hemolysis in case of ABO incompatibility. Finally, current therapeutic approaches for both TA-TMA and post-HSCT autoimmune HA, which are associated with high morbidity and mortality, are discussed.

Impact of recipient ABH secretor status on outcome in minor ABO-incompatible hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

The impact of ABO incompatibility on hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) outcome is controversial. As ABH substances are expressed on tissues and secreted in body fluids, they could drive an immune response in minor ABO-incompatible HSCT. The aim of the study was to investigate the prognostic role of the recipients' ABH secretor status.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients who underwent minor ABO-incompatible HSCT were included. Secretor status was determined either serologically or by molecular genetics.

RESULTS

Between March 1996 and June 2012, a total of 176 patients received minor ABO-incompatible HSCT and 150 (85%) were secretors. Incidence and severity of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and chronic GVHD did not differ between secretors and nonsecretors (cumulative incidences ± standard errors: acute GVHD on Day 100, 41 ± 11 and 46 ± 5%, p = 0.59; chronic GVHD at 2 years, 52 ± 13 and 56 ± 5%, p = 0.62, for secretors and nonsecretors, respectively). Additionally, nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and overall survival (OS) were similar in the two groups (2-year NRM, 27 ± 9 and 23 ± 3%, p = 0.45; 4-year OS, 64 ± 10 and 55 ± 4%, p = 0.28, for secretors and nonsecretors, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The recipients' ABH secretor status in minor ABO-incompatible HSCT has no prognostic impact on major transplant outcomes.

Current thawing and infusion practice of cryopreserved cord blood: the impact on graft quality, recipient safety, and transplantation outcomes

Methods of handling, thawing, and infusion of cord blood (CB) products vary substantially among thaw/transplant centers (TCs). This review 1) compares currently available CB product types and thaw methods recommended by CB banks (CBBs), 2) discusses causes of inconsistency in thaw method application at TCs, 3) advises elements to consider in thaw method approval or selection at the TC, 4) provides a procedural template for the traditional thaw methods, and 5) suggests acceptable time from product thaw to infusion and other considerations for safe infusion. It also compares postinfusion adverse reaction and engraftment data as functions of thaw methods. Remarks and suggestions made throughout this review are: 1) not intended to supersede manufacturer's instructions but meant to support the standardization of preparative procedures recommended by CBBs and 2) intended to help TCs to investigate relevant quality issues and handle challenges, especially when the TC is unable to follow recommendations due to foreseeable technical, quality, and/or clinical factors.

Analysis of donor and recipient ABO incompatibility and antibody-associated complications after allogeneic stem cell transplantation with reduced-intensity conditioning

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) can be performed across the ABO blood group barrier. The impact of ABO incompatibility on clinical outcome is controversial. A retrospective analysis of 310 patients who underwent HSCT with reduced-intensity conditioning between 1998 and 2011 was performed to investigate the frequency and clinical implications of anti-RBC antibodies in passenger lymphocyte syndrome (PLS) after minor ABO mismatch (mm), persistent or recurring recipient type ABO antibodies (PRABO) after major ABO mm HSCT, and autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA). Transplantation characteristics and clinical outcome were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis for groups with or without anti-RBC antibodies. ABO blood group incompatibility did not affect clinical outcome despite an increased requirement of blood transfusion. Twelve patients with AIHA, 6 patients with PLS, and 12 patients with PRABO post-HSCT were identified. AIHA did not affect overall survival (OS) or transplant-related mortality (TRM), but patients with AIHA had a lower incidence of grades II to IV acute graft-versus-host disease (P = .05). OS in the PLS group was 0% compared with 61% in the whole group receiving minor ABO mm transplants (P < .001). Comparing PRABO patients with those receiving a major ABO mm HSCT, the OS was 17% versus 73% (P = .002) and TRM was 50% versus 21% (P = .03). At our center, PLS after minor ABO mm and PRABO antibodies after major ABO mm HSCT are significant risk factors for decreased OS and TRM. Our results suggest that occurrence of unexpected ABO antibodies after HSCT warrant a wider investigation individual to find the underlying cause.