Residual risk of D alloimmunization: is it time to feel safe about platelets from D+ donors?

RhD-Alloimmunization in Adult and Pediatric Trauma Patients

The actual risk of providing RhD-positive units to RhD-negative recipients remains debatable. There is no standard of care in the United States (US) to guide transfusion decisions regarding RhD type for patients with an unknown blood type, except for women of childbearing age and neonates. The risk of alloantibody formation by an RhD-negative patient exposed to RhD-positive blood is reported to be from 3% to 70%. Due to such wide variations, this review was undertaken to determine the prevalence of anti-D alloimmunization in trauma patients who are RhD-negative and were transfused RhD-positive blood products. This study used the "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses" (PRISMA) approach to answer the question, "In trauma patients who were transfused blood, what is the prevalence of alloimmunization to the D-antigen?" The review included all published articles through April 3, 2022 in databases. Articles published after the search period found by the authors were added to the manuscript if they addressed the primary question and there was unanimous consensus. There were 1683 full-text articles that met the search criteria, with 19 studies meeting eligibility criteria. In addition, 57 references were added after the search period had closed. The incidence of anti-D alloimmunization in adult trauma patients receiving whole blood varied from 7.8% to 42.7%. In contrast, incidence varied in patients receiving red blood cells (RBCs), from 0 to 94%, depending on number of categories analyzed. Anti-D alloimmunization with platelet transfusions varied from 0% to 19%. The alloimmunization rate increased with age and was detected only in children older than 5 years. Recent guidelines recommend the administration of Rh immune globulin (RhIG) to all traumatically injured patients who are both RhD-negative and pregnant. However, there is no specific guidance focused on the RhD-negative patient, pregnant or nonpregnant, and who have received RhD-positive red blood cells (RBC) and platelets. While numerous studies have attempted to evaluate the frequency of RhD alloimmunization rate in trauma settings, emerging data suggests that many factors affect this phenomenon. Additionally, the role of RhIG administration in cases of RhD-incompatible transfusions within the trauma setting adds complexity. As our trajectory propels us towards precision medicine and tailored transfusion practices, gaining a big data approach becomes indispensable.

Platelet Transfusion-Insights from Current Practice to Future Development

Since the late sixties, therapeutic or prophylactic platelet transfusion has been used to relieve hemorrhagic complications of patients with, e.g., thrombocytopenia, platelet dysfunction, and injuries, and is an essential part of the supportive care in high dose chemotherapy. Current and upcoming advances will significantly affect present standards. We focus on specific issues, including the comparison of buffy-coat (BPC) and apheresis platelet concentrates (APC); plasma additive solutions (PAS); further measures for improvement of platelet storage quality; pathogen inactivation; and cold storage of platelets. The objective of this article is to give insights from current practice to future development on platelet transfusion, focusing on these selected issues, which have a potentially major impact on forthcoming guidelines.

Rhesus D Antigenic Determinants on Residual Red Blood Cells in Apheresis and Buffy Coat Platelet Concentrates

BACKGROUND

The level of residual red blood cells (RBCs) in platelet concentrates (PCs) is of interest because of clinical concerns related to alloimmunization to RBC antigens in transfused patients. This work aims at characterizing and quantifying the levels of intact and fragmented RBCs in apheresis (AP-PCs) and buffy coat PCs (BC-PCs) to assess their potential risk for RhD antigen alloimmunization.

METHODS

After staining with anti-CD41 (platelets) and anti-CD235a (RBCs) antibodies, the size and density of RhD antigen on intact and fragmented RBCs were analyzed by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

Residual RBC counts were 29 ± 22 × 106/unit in AP-PCs and 121 ± 54 × 106/unit in BC-PCs, which correspond to about 3 and 11 µL of RBCs by product, respectively. RhD expression was about 4 times higher on RBC particles in AP-PCs, and these particles contribute to 66 and 75% of the total antigenic load in BC-PCs and AP-PCs, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Processing methods influence the quantity and nature of contaminating residual RBCs and RBC-derived particles in PCs. The estimation of residual RBCs in these blood products is generally based on measurements of intact RBCs, which might underestimate the risk for alloim-munization in transfused patients. The question of whether these RBC-derived particles can produce an immune response and, thus, should then be taken into consideration for Rh immune prophylactic treatments, remains to be clarified.

Mitigation strategies for anti-D alloimmunization by platelet transfusion in haematopoietic stem cell transplant patients: a survey of NCCN® centres

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

D-negative patients are at risk of developing an alloantibody to D (anti-D) if exposed to D during transfusion. The presence of anti-D can lead to haemolytic transfusion reactions and haemolytic disease of the newborn. Anti-D alloimmunization can also complicate allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with haemolysis and increased transfusion requirements. The goal of this study was to determine whether cancer centres have transfusion practices intended to prevent anti-D alloimmunization with special attention in patients considered for HSCT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

To understand transfusion practices regarding D-positive platelets in D-negative patients with large transfusion needs, we surveyed the 28 cancer centres that are members of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network^® (NCCN^® ).

RESULTS

Nineteen centres responded (68%). Most centres (79%) avoid transfusing D-positive platelets to RhD-negative patients when possible. Four centres (21%) avoid D-positive platelets only in D-negative women of childbearing age. If a D-negative patient receives a D-positive platelet transfusion, 53% of centres would consider treating with Rh immune globulin (RhIg) to prevent alloimmunization in women of childbearing age. Only one centre also gives RhIg to all D-negative patients who are HSCT candidates including adult men and women of no childbearing age.

CONCLUSION

There is wide variation in platelet transfusion practices for supporting D-negative patients. The majority of centres do not have D-positive platelet transfusion policies focused on preventing anti-D alloimmunization specifically in patients undergoing HSCT. Multicentre, longitudinal studies are needed to understand the clinical implications of anti-D alloimmunization in HSCT patients.

Predisposing factors for anti-D immune response in D- patients with chronic liver disease transfused with D+ platelet concentrates

BACKGROUND

Recent reports have indicated that the risk of anti-D alloimmunization following D-incompatible platelet (PLT) transfusion is low in hematology and oncology patients. We investigated the rate of anti-D alloimmunization in RhD-negative (D^- ) patients with chronic liver disease transfused with D⁺ platelet concentrates (PCs) and the factors involved, at a liver transplant (LT) center.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We reviewed the blood bank database from January 2003 to October 2016. D^- patients who had received D⁺ PLT transfusions were eligible if they had undergone antibody screening at least 28 days after the first D⁺ PC transfusion, had no previous or concomitant exposure to D⁺ blood products, and had not received anti-D immunoglobulins.

RESULTS

Six of the 56 eligible patients (10.7%) had anti-D antibodies. All had received whole blood-derived PCs. Four of 20 patients (20%) untransplanted or transfused before LT and only two of 36 patients (5.6%) transfused during or after LT produced anti-D antibodies. These two patients were on maintenance immunosuppression based on low-dose steroids and tacrolimus. The factors identified as significantly associated with anti-D immune response were the presence of red blood cell immune alloantibodies before D⁺ PLT transfusion (p = 0.003), and D⁺ PLT transfusion outside the operative and postoperative (5 days) periods for LT (p = 0.023).

CONCLUSION

D^- patients with chronic liver disease transfused with D⁺ PLTs before LT are at high risk of developing anti-D antibodies. Preventive measures should be considered for these patients.

Anti-D Alloimmunization after RhD-Positive Platelet Transfusion in RhD-Negative Women under 55 Years Diagnosed with Acute Leukemia: Results of a Retrospective Study

Background

Anti-D alloimmunization can occur when platelets from RhD-positive donors are transfused to RhD-negative patients, due to red blood cell residues in the platelet concentrates.

Methods

Our objective was to analyze the anti-D alloimmunization rate in a selected group of women under 55 years of age diagnosed with acute leukemia over an 18-year period. We focused the analysis on RhD-negative patients who received RhD-positive platelet transfusions.

Results

From January 1998 to October 2016, 382 women under 55 years were diagnosed with acute leukemia. A total of 56 patients were RhD-negative, and 48 (85.7%) received RhD-positive platelets. The median number of platelet concentrates transfused per patient was 23, and 48% of all platelet transfusions were RhD-positive. The 48 RhD-negative patients received a total of 949 RhD-positive platelet concentrates. Two patients developed anti-D: a 36-year-old woman with M3 acute myeloblastic leukemia and a 52-year-old patient with a secondary acute myeloblastic leukemia.

Conclusion

We conclude that there is a need for agreement in the transfusion guidelines on the recommendation of anti-D alloimmunization prophylaxis. We suggest a possible benefit in favor of anti-D prophylaxis in childbearing women with acute leukemia.

Current trends in platelet transfusions practice: The role of ABO-RhD and human leukocyte antigen incompatibility

Platelet transfusions have contributed to the revolutionary modern treatment of hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia. Despite the long-term application of platelet transfusion in therapeutics, all aspects of their optimal use (i.e., in cases of ABO and/or Rh (D incompatibility) have not been definitively determined yet. We reviewed the available data on transfusion practices and outcome in ABO and RhD incompatibility and platelet refractoriness due to anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies. Transfusion of platelets with major ABO-incompatibility is related to reduced posttransfusion platelet (PLT) count increments, compared to ABO-identical and minor, but still are equally effective in preventing clinical bleeding. ABO-minor incompatible transfusions pose the risk of an acute hemolytic reaction of the recipient that is not always related to high anti-A, B donor titers. ABO-identical PLT transfusion seems to be the most effective and safest therapeutic strategy. Exclusive ABO-identical platelet transfusion policy could be feasible, but alternative approaches could facilitate platelet inventory management. Transfusion of platelets from RhD positive donors to RhD negative patients is considered to be effective and safe though is associated with low rate of anti-D alloimmunization due to contaminating red blood cells. The prevention of D alloimmunization is recommended only for women of childbearing age. HLA alloimmunization is a major cause of platelet refractoriness. Managing patients with refractoriness with cross-matched or HLA-matched platelets is the current practice although data are still lacking for the efficacy of this practice in terms of clinical outcome. Leukoreduction contributes to the reduction of both HLA and anti-D alloimmunization.