Comparison of the in vitro storage properties of Amicus apheresis platelets collected using single- and double-needle procedures from the same donors

Are Buffy-coat Pooled Platelet Concentrates an Effective Alternative to Apheresis Platelet Concentrates? An In vitro Analysis at a Tertiary Care Center in Northern India

Background

There is a need for platelet products to have the best quality. Apheresis platelet concentrates (PCs) obtained from single-donors PCs (SD-PCs) are considered best but have issues such as feasibility and cost. Buffy-coat pooled PCs (BCP-PCs) are considered an alternative to SD-PCs. This study compares BCP-PCs and SD-PCs for in vitro quality parameters and their changes during storage.

Materials and Methods

Fifteen units of BCP-PCs and 15 units of SD-PCs were prepared. In this study, a pool of five buffy coats was prepared. Fifteen units of BCP-PCs were analyzed on day 1 and day 5 of storage, while 15 SD-PCs were analyzed on day 1 while ten units on day 5. The parameters analyzed were volume, hematological parameters, pH, swirling, and sterility.

Results

The mean platelets count of SD-PCs was found to be significantly higher as compared to BCP-PCs. White blood cells (WBCs) contamination was significantly lower in BCP-PCs as compared to SD-PCs. The mean pH and mean platelet volume of SD-PCs were significantly lower than BCP-PCs. During storage, the mean platelets count of BCP-PCs was decreased significantly while that of SD-PCs nonsignificantly. The mean WBCs count and pH decreased in both BCP-PCs and SD-PCs significantly. All units in both types of PCs were sterile.

Conclusion

Platelet yield was significantly better in SD-PCs, while mean WBCs contamination was significantly lower in BCP-PCs. BCP-PCs may be preferred in place of SD-PCs in case of nonavailability of apheresis, difficulty in finding a willing donor, or when the cost is of consideration.

Quality validation of platelets obtained from the Haemonetics and Trima Accel automated blood-collection systems

BACKGROUND

Platelet transfusion is required to treat haemo-oncology or trauma patients. Platelet apheresis (PA) performed with apheresis equipment has increased rapidly in recent years. Leucocyte-reduced platelet apheresis (LRPA) can reduce the risk of platelet refractoriness and febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reactions (FNHTRs) for transfusion. Accordingly, this study aimed to investigate and compare the platelet metabolic and functional responses between PA performed with Haemonetics and LRPA performed with Trima Accel cell separator.

METHODS

The qualities of platelets collected through PA and LRPA were evaluated in terms of visual appearance, morphology, platelet-aggregation changes, metabolic activities, and bacterium-screening test during 5-day storage. Statistical analyses included two-sample t-test and generalised estimating equation(GEE) method.

RESULTS

During 5-day storage in LRPA, residual leucocytes were all <1.0×10⁶, and the parameters of platelet function were as follows: platelet aggregated to agonists such as adenosine 5'-diphosphate (ADP) and collagen, and the extent of shape change and pO₂ showed no statistically significant difference between PA and LRPA. The hypotonic shock reaction (HSR) on days 0, 1, and 3 were significantly higher in LRPA than in PA (71.78±6.92 vs. 64.10±7.42; P=0.002; 71.53±8.98 vs. 62.96±9.84; P=0.007; 68.05±7.28 vs. 57.76±6.80; P<0.0001, respectively). Values of mean platelet volume (MPV) were statistically larger in PA than in LRPA on days 0, 1, and 3. On day 5, the swirling score was higher in LRPA than in PA. The mean lactate levels had no statistically significant difference between PA and LRPA. Moreover, no growth was observed through bacterium-screening test conducted on 40 samples.

CONCLUSION

Comparison of LRPA and PA products collected from the Trima Accel and Haemonetics automated blood-collection systems, respectively, revealed that both products possessed good platelet qualities even though additional processes are needed to reduce leucocytes. Furthermore, investigating the outcomes of other apheresis instruments with focus on the safety of donors, products, and recipients is necessary.

Influence of apheresis collection device and container on the storage properties of platelets in 90% PAS-5/10% plasma

BACKGROUND

The storage properties of apheresis platelets suspended in the experimental additive solution PAS-5 and 10% plasma may be affected by the collection instrument or storage container.

METHODS AND EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The same consenting 12 donors provided A or T platelets with concurrent plasma on four occasions in 100% plasma. Following collection and resting, the platelets were centrifuged, and plasma was expressed and resuspended in PAS-5 to yield units with 10% plasma. Platelets were either maintained in the original storage container or transferred to another of the manufacturer's storage containers. On days 1, 5 and 7, units were assayed for an array of in vitro tests.

RESULTS

Average unit volume, yield and percent plasma was 291±11 mL, 3.7±0.4×10¹¹, and 10.3±0.7%, respectively, and were comparable between collections with either of the apheresis instruments and stored with either of the manufacturer's containers. Day 1 platelet activation (CD62P+) was 40±22% and was similar in either of the collection instruments or containers. Except for pH (days 1, 5), CO₂ (days 1, 5, 7), and extent of shape change (day 5), every other in vitro parameter was similar between apheresis platforms or the manufacturer's container. pH values of all units on all days of storage were ≥6.8, except one unit that was collected on T and stored in an A container, which had pH values of 6.8 and 5.7 on days 5 and 7, respectively.

DISCUSSION

Storage of platelets suspended in PAS-5 with 10% plasma is feasible in the original manufacturer's container for seven days. Based on CO₂ levels, T containers have greater gas exchange than A containers.

Efficacy and Usefulness of New Single-Needle Intensive Granulocyte and Monocyte Adsorptive Apheresis in Active Ulcerative Colitis Patients Without Corticosteroids and Biologics

Intensive granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis (GMA) twice weekly is effective and safe for patients with active ulcerative colitis (UC), but the requirement for maintaining two blood access routes is problematic. Here we compared the efficacy and safety of one-route blood access intensive GMA using a single-needle (SN) and conventional two-route blood access intensive GMA using a double-needle (DN) in patients with active UC not undergoing corticosteroid therapy. Among 80 active UC patients, 38 patients received SN intensive GMA and 42 patients received DN intensive GMA. The clinical remission ratio and mucosal healing ratio at 6 weeks, and the cumulative non-relapse ratio at 52 weeks did not differ significantly between groups. In addition, no serious or mild adverse effects were observed in SN intensive GMA. SN intensive GMA may be an adequate and novel therapeutic option for active UC as an alternative therapy before using corticosteroids.