Obesity and risk of venous thromboembolism among postmenopausal women: differential impact of hormone therapy by route of estrogen administration. The ESTHER Study

Obesity and menopause

Obesity is not a choice or a result of lack of willpower, but a multifactorial, chronic, progressive, and relapsing disease. During menopause, hormonal and body composition changes lead to greater visceral adiposity, that aggravates women's health at a cardiometabolic, mechanic and mental level. Adiposity has been identified as an important modifier of reproductive hormones. During female midlife, obesity has been associated with menstrual cycle alterations (anovulatory cycles ending with abnormal bleedings), menopausal symptoms including hot flashes, poor quality of sleep, aches and joint pain, genitourinary symptoms, and reduced quality of life. However, the relationships between weight, the menopausal process, aging, and hormone levels remain poorly understood. Women with obesity have an increased risk of thromboembolic disease when using menopause hormone therapy (MHT), and it is probably the main medical condition to prescribe or not MHT. However, this risk depends on the route and type of MHT. The use of estrogen-only or combined transdermal MHT does not increase the risk of a thrombotic event in women with obesity.

Exploring the potential for a set of UK hormone replacement therapy eligibility guidelines: A suggested proposal on the topic of venous thromboembolism

OBJECTIVE

To explore the feasibility for a set of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) eligibility guidelines that follow a similar structure and appearance to the UKMEC guidance for contraception. To enable non-specialists to feel confident in safely prescribing HRT and to aid selection of the most appropriate first line treatment.

METHODS

A literature review was undertaken with evidence summarised on the topic of venous thromboembolism (VTE) which is an area frequently considered a barrier to prescribing. Medical eligibility tables which separated HRT by type were then produced for a set of VTE-related topics.

RESULTS

The literature search confirmed the importance of distinguishing between different types and routes of administration when considering the suitability of HRT. Much of the evidence has been based on older synthetic types of HRT and whilst they still have a role in management, these medications carry different risks to the now more accepted use of body identical types. The search also highlighted the nuances involved, increasing the complexity of forming guidelines, with the need for consideration to be given to an individual's own perception of risks and benefits.

CONCLUSION

The demand for HRT has risen in recent years and there is a need for this to be managed effectively, particularly for patients in primary care. The production of this type of guidance will enable the non-specialist to feel confident in safe and evidence-based prescribing. The guidelines are also designed to demonstrate to prescribers which complex patients should be referred onto menopause specialists.

Withholding of Hormone Replacement Therapy Prior to Total Joint Arthroplasty Surgery to Reduce the Risk of Postoperative Thromboembolic Events: Is It Justified?-A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines

BACKGROUND

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT), menopausal hormone therapy (MHT), and estrogen-containing medications are frequently withheld before elective lower limb arthroplasty, based on a perceived risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, evidence linking HRT, MHT, and an increased VTE risk is equivocal. This systematic review evaluated the concordance of international clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) on the withholding of HRT or MHT.

METHODS

The PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane, and Ovid databases were searched for CPGs for the preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative management of patients on HRT and MHT undergoing elective lower limb arthroplasty. This was supplemented by an internet search. There were 7 international CPGs in English, from Europe and North America, published between January 2000 and February 2023 reviewed against the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation Instrument (AGREE-II) criteria, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist.

RESULTS

The guidelines reviewed revealed a mixed picture on HRT or MHT withdrawal and use in arthroplasty, with some featuring detailed advice on the preoperative and postoperative management of HRT or MHT (Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network), while others featured no guidance (American College of Chest Physicians). The evidence referenced in these guidelines highlighted studies showing HRT or MHT to play a limited role in increasing VTE risk, with most studies from the 1990s and 2000s.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on current evidence, non-estrogen-containing transdermal HRT or MHT should not be withheld in patients undergoing elective joint arthroplasty, though further evidence is required to justify withholding estrogen-containing forms.

Menopause-Biology, consequences, supportive care, and therapeutic options

Menopause is the cessation of ovarian function, with loss of reproductive hormone production and irreversible loss of fertility. It is a natural part of reproductive aging. The physiology of the menopause is complex and incompletely understood. Globally, menopause occurs around the age of 49 years, with geographic and ethnic variation. The hormonal changes of the menopause transition may result in both symptoms and long-term systemic effects, predominantly adverse effects on cardiometabolic and musculoskeletal health. The most effective treatment for bothersome menopausal symptoms is evidence-based, menopausal hormone therapy (MHT), which reduces bone loss and may have cardiometabolic benefits. Evidence-based non-hormonal interventions are also available for symptom relief. Treatment should be individualized with shared decision-making. Most MHT regimens are not regulator approved for perimenopausal women. Studies that include perimenopausal women are needed to determine the efficacy and safety of treatment options. Further research is crucial to improve menopause care, along with research to guide policy and clinical practice.

Vasomotor Symptoms During Menopause: A Practical Guide on Current Treatments and Future Perspectives

Vasomotor symptoms affect as many as 80% of midlife women, but only about one in four women receive treatment due to many factors. Menopausal hormone therapy remains the most effective treatment for vasomotor symptoms, and current professional guidelines conclude that the benefits of treatment typically outweigh the risks for healthy, symptomatic women under age 60 years and those within 10 years from their final menstrual period. For women with medical comorbidities, an individualized approach to treatment is recommended. For women who cannot use or choose not to use menopausal hormone therapy, there are many evidence-based non-hormonal options available including pharmacologic therapies. This review aims to summarize treatment options for bothersome vasomotor symptoms to guide clinicians caring for midlife women.

Eligibility criteria for Menopausal Hormone Therapy (MHT): a position statement from a consortium of scientific societies for the use of MHT in women with medical conditions. MHT Eligibility Criteria Group

This project aims to develop eligibility criteria for menopausal hormone therapy (MHT). The tool should be similar to those already established for contraception A consortium of scientific societies coordinated by the Spanish Menopause Society met to formulate recommendations for the use of MHT by women with medical conditions based on the best available evidence. The project was developed in two phases. As a first step, we conducted 14 systematic reviews and 32 metanalyses on the safety of MHT (in nine areas: age, time of menopause onset, treatment duration, women with thrombotic risk, women with a personal history of cardiovascular disease, women with metabolic syndrome, women with gastrointestinal diseases, survivors of breast cancer or of other cancers, and women who smoke) and on the most relevant pharmacological interactions with MHT. These systematic reviews and metanalyses helped inform a structured process in which a panel of experts defined the eligibility criteria according to a specific framework, which facilitated the discussion and development process. To unify the proposal, the following eligibility criteria have been defined in accordance with the WHO international nomenclature for the different alternatives for MHT (category 1, no restriction on the use of MHT; category 2, the benefits outweigh the risks; category 3, the risks generally outweigh the benefits; category 4, MHT should not be used). Quality was classified as high, moderate, low or very low, based on several factors (including risk of bias, inaccuracy, inconsistency, lack of directionality and publication bias). When no direct evidence was identified, but plausibility, clinical experience or indirect evidence were available, "Expert opinion" was categorized. For the first time, a set of eligibility criteria, based on clinical evidence and developed according to the most rigorous methodological tools, has been defined. This will provide health professionals with a powerful decision-making tool that can be used to manage menopausal symptoms.

Management of postmenopausal women: Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français (CNGOF) and Groupe d'Etude sur la Ménopause et le Vieillissement (GEMVi) Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The aim of these recommendations is to set forth an individualized approach to the management of early postmenopausal women (i.e., within the first 10 years after natural menopause) covering all aspects of lifestyle and therapeutic management, with or without menopause hormone therapy (MHT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Literature review and consensus of French expert opinion. Recommendations were graded according to the HAS methodology and levels of evidence derived from the international literature, except when there was no good-quality evidence.

SUMMARY RECOMMENDATIONS

The beginning of menopause is an ideal time for each woman to evaluate her health status by assessing her bone, cardiovascular, and cancer-related risk factors that may be amplified by postmenopausal estrogen deficiency and by reviewing her lifestyle habits. Improving lifestyle, including nutrition and physical activity, and avoiding risk factors (notably smoking), should be recommended to all women. MHT remains the most effective treatment for vasomotor symptoms but it could be also recommended as first-line treatment for the prevention of osteoporosis in early postmenopausal women at low to moderate risk for fracture. The risks of MHT differ depending on its type, dose, duration of use, route of administration, timing of initiation, and whether a progestogen is used. There is reasonable evidence that using transdermal estradiol in association with micronized progesterone or dydrogesterone may limit both the venous thromboembolic risk associated with oral estrogens and the risk of breast cancer associated with synthetic progestins. Treatment should be individualized to each woman, by using the best available evidence to maximize benefits and minimize risks, with periodic reevaluation of its benefit-risk balance. For bothersome genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) symptoms, vaginal treatment with lubricants and moisturizers is recommended as first-line treatment together with low-dose vaginal estrogen therapy, depending on the clinical course. No recommendation of an optimal duration of MHT can be made, but it must take into consideration the initial indication for MHT as well as each woman's benefit-risk balance. Management of gynecological side-effects of MHT is also examined. These recommendations are endorsed by the Groupe d'Etude sur la Ménopause et le Vieillissement hormonal (GEMVI) and the Collège National des Gynécologues-Obstétriciens Français (CNGOF).

Glucocorticoids and Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Asthma Patients Aged 20-59 Years in the United Kingdom's CPRD 1995-2015

BACKGROUND

Glucocorticoids, the class of steroids used in management of asthma, have been observed to be associated with adverse events such as increased coagulation and inhibition of fibrinolysis. This study evaluated the risk of VTE in relation to the use of glucocorticoids in patients with asthma.

METHODS

We conducted a nested case-control study among patients aged 20-59 years with asthma who received at least one glucocorticoid prescription during 1995-2015 in the UK-based Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD. We used descriptive analyses and conditional logistic regression to evaluate the risk of VTE associated with glucocorticoid use.

RESULTS

The adjusted ORs (aORs) (95% CI) for VTE in patients exposed to glucocorticoids were 1.9 (1.6-2.3), 1.4 (1.1-1.8), and 1.2 (0.9-1.5) for current, recent, and past glucocorticoid users, respectively, compared to the unexposed. The aORs (95% CI) for VTE in patients exposed to systemic glucocorticoid and inhaled glucocorticoids, compared to the unexposed, were 3.5 (2.7-4.5) and 1.5 (1.3-1.8), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Current and systemic glucocorticoid use was associated with a dose-response increased risk of incident idiopathic VTE.

Transdermal estrogen therapy in menopausal women at increased risk for thrombotic events: a scoping review

IMPORTANCE AND OBJECTIVE

It is estimated that over 45% of women in the United States are menopausal. Many of these women suffer from vasomotor symptoms of menopause, for which the gold standard treatment is menopause hormone therapy (MHT). However, MHT use has been controversial since the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) study in 2001. Transdermal MHT has been shown to be effective for treatment of vasomotor symptoms and does not increase the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) when used in healthy postmenopausal women. However, there is little data on its safety in women at increased risk for VTE such as women with prior VTE, increased body mass index, thrombophilia, tobacco use, autoimmune disease, chronic inflammatory disorders, recent surgery, trauma, or immobilization. This scoping review of the literature provides clinicians with an overview of the evidence on the risk profile of transdermal MHT use in these postmenopausal women at increased risk of VTE.

METHODS

We searched all published studies from 2000 to 2020 and included 13 primary articles on transdermal MHT use in postmenopausal women at increased risk of VTE.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

In women with prior VTE, two studies found a decrease in coagulability and no increased risk of recurrent VTE with transdermal MHT use. In women with increased body mass index, three studies found no increased VTE risk in transdermal MHT users. In women with prothrombotic genetic polymorphisms, three studies found minimal to no increased VTE risk in transdermal MHT users. In women with various proinflammatory comorbidities, five studies found an improved thrombotic profile and no increased VTE risk with transdermal MHT use. This scoping review provides data regarding the safety of transdermal MHT use in postmenopausal women with risk factors for VTE, and clinicians should have risk versus benefit discussions with each patient regarding its use.

Successful Treatment of Massive Pulmonary Embolism with Rescue Fibrinolysis in Young Patient with Homocystinemia - Case Report

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the most frequently missed diagnosis in the urgent clinical department with serious consequences. Patients with unprovoked PE have increased risk of recurrent PE. Approximately 5 to 8% of PE patients have inherited thrombophilias. A solated homocystinemia is a rare cause of unprovoked acute pulmonary embolism. Timely diagnosis and proper treatment can prevent complications, costs and mortality and provide patient better quality of life. We are presenting a 42-year-old woman was admitted to our emergency department with the first episode of severe dyspnea and chest pain. She had no history of previous cardiovascular or respiratory disease and no history of previous pulmonary embolism (PE) or deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Urgent echocardiography showed indirect signs of pulmonary embolism which was confirmed by the pulmonary artery CT angiography performed one day after the patient’s admission. After two days of heparin infusion, she developed a hemodynamic instability with cardiogenic shock and was treated successfully with fibrinolysis. After the clinical stabilization, she was put on the rivaroxaban therapy, which was recommended for additional six months. The thrombophilia profile was done two weeks after stopping the therapy with rivaroxaban. The thrombophilia panel came back positive for high levels of homocysteine (67 μmol/L), with other thrombophilia results within normal limits. The patient was stable during the follow-up period. Pulmonary embolism should be always suspected in younger patients with acute severe dyspnea even without provocable risk factors. High suspicion level and fast diagnosis are lifesaving. In younger patients presented with unprovoked pulmonary embolism, clinicians should consider inherited prothrombotic factors and homocystinemia as a potential cause. Rescue fibrinolysis is a lifesaving therapy in hemodynamic worsening in intermediate high-risk PE patients. A longer anticoagulation therapy should be considered in these cases with novel oral anticoagulants that are recommended as safer and superior therapy.

[Menopause and risk of thromboembolic events. Postmenopausal women management: CNGOF and GEMVi clinical practice guidelines]

The incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) increases with age with an annual incidence of 1.25/1000 women in the 40-59 age group. Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) may also increase the risk of VTE. This risk must be assessed during the first consultation before initiating MHT and assess each renewal of the MHT. MHT with oral estrogen combined (or not) with progestin increases the risk of VTE by about 70%. Using transdermal estrogen does not appear to increase the risk of VTE in women. VTE risk appears to be modulated by the type of progestin combined in MHT. The risk of VTE associated with MHT with transdermal estradiol appears to be safe in women using micronised progesterone and pregnane derivatives and higher in women using norpregnane derivatives . To limit the risk of VTE associated with MHT, transdermal estradiol use is recommended. In women at risk of VTE, MHT with oral estrogen is contraindicated. MHT with transdermal estradiol associated (or not) with micronised progesterone or dydrogesterone may be used in women with low or moderate risk of VTE.

Does the route of administration for estrogen hormone therapy impact the risk of venous thromboembolism? Estradiol transdermal system versus oral estrogen-only hormone therapy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to quantify the magnitude of risk reduction for venous thromboembolism events associated with an estradiol transdermal system relative to oral estrogen-only hormone therapy agents.

METHODS

A claims analysis was conducted using the Thomson Reuters MarketScan database from January 2002 to October 2009. Participants 35 years or older who were newly using an estradiol transdermal system or an oral estrogen-only hormone therapy with two or more dispensings were analyzed. Venous thromboembolism was defined as one or more diagnosis codes for deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. Cohorts of estradiol transdermal system and oral estrogen-only hormone therapy were matched 1:1 based on both exact factor and propensity score matching, and an incidence rate ratio was used to compare the rates of venous thromboembolism between the matched cohorts. Remaining baseline imbalances from matching were included as covariates in multivariate adjustments.

RESULTS

Among the matched estradiol transdermal system and oral estrogen-only hormone therapy users (27,018 women in each group), the mean age of the cohorts was 48.9 years; in each cohort, 6,044 (22.4%) and 1,788 (6.6%) participants had a hysterectomy and an oophorectomy at baseline, respectively. A total of 115 estradiol transdermal system users developed venous thromboembolism, compared with 164 women in the estrogen-only hormone therapy cohort (unadjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.57-0.91; P = 0.006). After adjustment for confounding factors, the incidence of venous thromboembolism remained significantly lower for estradiol transdermal system users than for estrogen-only hormone therapy users.

CONCLUSIONS

This large population-based study suggests that participants receiving an estradiol transdermal system have a significantly lower incidence of venous thromboembolism than do participants receiving oral estrogen-only hormone therapy.

Menopausal hormone therapy and heart disease prevention: desired or valid?

Cardiovascular diseases are the main cause of death for women in older age groups. For many decades, specialists have tried to prevent their development by the use of estrogen. The review of the literature presents current data on the effect of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) on the risk of cardiovascular complications. The results of the main randomized clinical and observational studies in this area, conducted over several decades, are discussed. We described the concept of “window of opportunities”, in accordance with which an improvement in cardiovascular prognosis can be expected only at the onset of MHT in women under the age of 60 years in early postmenopause (menopause duration <10 years). There are experimental and clinical data explaining the different effects of estrogen on the cardiovascular prognosis in women of various age groups and different duration of postmenopause. The recommendations given in the review on the use of MHT are based on modern international guidelines.

NAMS 3rd Utian Translational Science Symposium, October 2016, Orlando, Florida A conversation about hormone therapy: is there an appropriate dose, route, and duration of use?

The North American Menopause Society (NAMS) held the 3rd Utian Translational Symposium on October 4, 2016, in Orlando, Florida, to answer questions about the benefits and risks of hormone therapy (HT) for postmenopausal women. This report is a record of the proceedings of that symposium.The maxim about HT for the past 15 years since the publication of the initial results of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) has been to prescribe the "lowest dose for the shortest period of time." With new clinical trials, observational data, and further analysis of the WHI and the cumulative 13 years' follow-up, it was time to hold a conversation about the state of the evidence and recommendations for HT dose, route, and duration of use.The symposium brought together experts in the field of HT to speak on these topics, organized by session, after which working groups gathered to synthesize the presentations into areas of what still needs to be known and how to proceed with areas of needed research. After the presentations, there was consensus that postmenopausal women aged younger than 60 years or within 10 years of menopause onset without contraindications and who desire to take HT for relief of vasomotor symptoms or prevention of bone loss if at elevated risk can safely do so.The working groups raised the possibility that the use of "Big Data" (pharmacy and cancer databases) would allow answers that cannot be found in clinical trials. This could lead to more appropriate FDA labeling and patient package inserts reflecting the true risks associated with various types and formulations of HT, with differences among estrogen alone, estrogen with a progestogen, and estrogen plus a selective estrogen-receptor modulator for the younger women most likely to initiate these therapies for symptom relief. Differences were found for potential risk among estrogen alone, estrogen with synthetic progestins contrasted to progesterone, lower doses, nonoral doses, and low-dose vaginal estrogen.With all of the available routes and dosages, including vaginal estrogen alone for genitourinary symptoms, there are many options when considering the most appropriate type, dose, formulation, route of administration, and duration of use, taking into account the age of the woman at initiation of HT and the time from menopause.

Comparison of clinical outcomes among users of oral and transdermal estrogen therapy in the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study

OBJECTIVE

To examine associations of estrogen preparations with an index of health risks versus benefits.

METHODS

Using data from 45,112 participants of the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study (average follow-up 5.5 years), we examined associations of estrogen type and oral conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) dose with time to first global index event (GIE), defined as coronary heart disease, breast cancer, stroke, pulmonary embolism, hip fracture, colorectal cancer, endometrial cancer, or death.

RESULTS

Oral CEE less than 0.625 mg/d + progestogen (P) users had a lower risk of a GIE (adjusted hazard ratio 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.56-0.97) than oral CEE 0.625 mg/d + P users. GIE risk in oral CEE 0.625 mg/d + P users was greater with at least 5-year use (adjusted hazard ratio 1.22, 95% confidence interval 1.06-1.41) than with less than 5-year use. In women with prior hysterectomy, compared with women taking oral CEE 0.625 mg/d for less than 5 years, GIE risk was similar with oral CEE below 0.625 mg/d, oral estradiol (E2), and transdermal E2, whether used for less than 5 years or for at least 5 years. There was no difference in GIE risk between users of the following: oral CEE + P versus oral E2 + P; oral CEE + P versus transdermal E2 + P; oral E2 + P versus transdermal E2 + P. Findings were similar among women with hysterectomy taking estrogen alone.

CONCLUSIONS

The summary index of risks versus benefits was similar for oral CEE versus oral or transdermal E2-containing regimens. CEE + P containing less than 0.625 mg/d of CEE (vs 0.625 mg/d) for less than 5 years appeared safer.

Progestogens and venous thromboembolism in menopausal women: an updated oral versus transdermal estrogen meta-analysis

Postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) is a modifiable risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). While the route of estrogen administration is now well recognized as an important determinant of VTE risk, there is also increasing evidence that progestogens may modulate the estrogen-related VTE risk. This review updates previous meta-analyses of VTE risk in HT users, focusing on the route of estrogen administration, hormonal regimen and progestogen type. Among women using estrogen-only preparations, oral but not transdermal preparations increased VTE risk (relative risk (RR) 1.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.39-1.58; RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.87-1.09, respectively). In women using opposed estrogen, results were highly heterogeneous due to important differences between the molecules of progestogen. In transdermal estrogen users, there was no change in VTE risk in women using micronized progesterone (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.65-1.33), whereas norpregnane derivatives were associated with increased VTE risk (RR 2.42, 95% CI 1.84-3.18). Among women using opposed oral estrogen, there was higher VTE risk in women using medroxyprogesterone acetate (RR 2.77, 95% CI 2.33-3.30) than in those using other progestins. These clinical findings, together with consistent biological data, emphasize the safety advantage of transdermal estrogen combined with progesterone and support the current evidence-based recommendations on HT, especially in women at high VTE risk.

Venous thromboembolism and cardiovascular disease complications in menopausal women using transdermal versus oral estrogen therapy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) complications, and assess healthcare costs in menopausal women using an estradiol transdermal system versus oral estrogen therapy (ET).

METHODS

Health insurance claims from 60 self-insured US companies from 1999 to 2011 were analyzed. Women at least 50 years of age, newly initiated on transdermal or oral ET, were included. Cohorts were matched 1:1 based on exact factors and propensity score-matching methods. The incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of CVD complications, as well as VTE and other CVD events separately, were assessed through conditional Poisson models. Cohorts were also compared for healthcare costs using linear regression models to assess per-patient per-month cost differences. Confidence intervals (CIs) and P values were determined using a nonparametric method for cost outcomes.

RESULTS

From each cohort, 2,551 users were matched to form the study population. A total of 274 transdermal ET users developed CVD complications compared with 316 women in the oral ET cohort (adjusted IRR 0.81; 95% CI, 0.67-0.99). Transdermal ET users also incurred lower adjusted all-cause and VTE/CVD-related healthcare costs relative to oral ET users (all-cause per-patient per-month cost difference [95% CI] = $41 [-34; 137], P = 0.342).

CONCLUSIONS

This large matched-cohort study based on real-world data suggests that women receiving transdermal ET have significantly lower incidences of CVD events compared with those receiving oral ET, and that they also incur lower healthcare costs.

HRT for women with premature ovarian insufficiency: a comprehensive review

BACKGROUND

Premature ovarian insufficiency (POI), often and misleadingly referred to as ‘premature menopause’, is defined as a loss of ovarian activity before the age of 40 years and is characterized by irregular or absent periods and reduced fertility. Symptoms include those associated with the natural menopause (night sweats and vaginal dryness), and with the long-term adverse effects of estrogen deficiency (osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease): the latter is believed to explain the shorter life expectancy associated with POI.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

The objective of the current review was to collect all relevant studies supporting recommendations on the indications, treatment options, and risks of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) (estrogen, progestogens and androgens) for women with POI.

SEARCH METHODS

The current review was written based on the best available evidence on the topic collected for the recently published ESHRE guideline on the management of women with POI. PUBMED/MEDLINE and the Cochrane library were searched in a stepwise approach. Relevant references were summarized in evidence tables, with assessment of the quality.

OUTCOMES

HRT is strongly recommended for women with POI, mainly for vasomotor and genito-urinary symptom relief. In addition, HRT has been shown to have a role in bone protection and probably also in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. There is little evidence on the optimal type, regimen and dose of HRT; patient preference for route and method of administration of each component of HRT must be considered when prescribing, as should contraceptive needs. In women with POI, physiological replacement of estrogen (and progesterone) is essential for their health, and the controversies that surround the use of HRT in postmenopausal women do not apply.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

N/A.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

New areas of study on HRT for women with POI should focus on life expectancy, quality of life and neurological function. Furthermore, randomized controlled trials comparing transdermal estradiol with oral estrogens with regard to efficacy, patient satisfaction and side effects are urgently needed.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

The authors received no funding for the review. The costs for the development of the ESHRE guideline were covered by ESHRE. The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

How do you decide on hormone replacement therapy in women with risk of venous thromboembolism?

Women are increasingly encouraged to participate in making decisions about hormone replacement therapy (HRT). In postmenopausal women with severe vasomotor symptoms, HRT can significantly improve the quality of life. However, the use of HRT may also increase the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), the risk which depends of both treatment-related and patient-related factors. This review summarizes some important points about the selection of the safest hormonal replacement modality in women with a history of VTE and management of VTE risks in postmenopausal women wishing to take HRT.

Hormone therapy and risk of venous thromboembolism among postmenopausal women

Despite a decrease in the use of postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) over the last decade, many women are still prescribed this treatment, as it remains the most effective means of counteracting climacteric symptoms. Its use declined when it was shown that HT increases the risk of breast cancer, stroke and venous thromboembolism (VTE). Nevertheless, that benefit/risk ratio was established among women using oral estrogens alone or combined with a specific progestogen and it cannot necessarily be extrapolated to other HTs. Oral estrogens increase the risk of VTE especially during the first year of treatment and past users revert to a similar risk as women who have never used them. There is now growing evidence that VTE risk among HT users strongly depends on the route of administration. Indeed, transdermal estrogens, unlike oral estrogens, are not associated with an increased VTE risk and biological data support this difference between oral and transdermal estrogens. In addition, transdermal estrogens may not confer additional risk in women at high risk of VTE. Significant differences in thrombotic risk between HT preparations also relate to the concomitant progestogen. Studies have consistently shown that VTE risk is higher among users of combined estrogens plus progestogens than among users of estrogens alone. With respect to the different pharmacological classes of progestogens, two observational studies found that norpregnane derivatives are associated with an increased VTE risk, whereas micronized progesterone may be safe with respect to thrombotic risk. In conclusion, transdermal estrogens alone or combined with micronized progesterone may represent the safest alternative for women who require HT.

The risk of venous thrombosis in women over 50 years old using oral contraception or postmenopausal hormone therapy

BACKGROUND

Oral contraception (OC) and postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) can be used to alleviate menopausal symptoms. However, the risk of venous thrombosis (VT) associated with OC use in women over 50 years old has never been assessed and the two preparations have not been directly compared.

OBJECTIVES

To determine and compare the risk of VT associated with OC and HT use.

METHODS

From a large case-control study, 2550 women aged over 50 years old, 1082 patients with a first VT and 1468 controls, were included. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals for VT were calculated for OC-users (164 patients and 54 controls) and HT-users (88 patients and 102 controls) compared with non-hormone users (823 patients and 1304 controls).

RESULTS

OC-users had a 6.3-fold (4.6-9.8) increased risk of VT. This ranged from 5.4 (3.3-8.9) for preparations containing levonorgestrel to 10.2 (4.8-21.7) for desogestrel. The VT-risk associated with oral HT use was 4.0 (1.8-8.2) for conjugated equine estrogen combined with medroxyprogesterone acetate and 3.9 (1.5-10.7) for micronized estradiol combined with norethisterone acetate. Non-oral HT did not increase the risk of VT: OR 1.1 (0.6-1.8). Relative risk estimates were further increased in hormone users with factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A or blood group non-O and hormone users with a family history of VT.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, non-oral HT seemed to be the safest hormonal preparation in women over 50 years old. OC use increased the VT risk the most, especially in women with inherited thrombophilia or a family history of VT.

Venous thromboembolism risk in relation to use of different types of postmenopausal hormone therapy in a large prospective study

BACKGROUND

Current use of menopausal hormone therapy (HT) increases the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and the formulations used may affect risk.

METHODS

A total of 1,058,259 postmenopausal UK women were followed by record linkage to routinely collected National Health Service hospital admission and death records. HT use and risk of VTE was examined using Cox regression to estimate relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

During 3.3 million years of follow-up, 2200 women had an incident VTE, diagnosed, on average, 1.5 years after last reporting HT use. RRs in current vs. never users at last reporting varied by HT formulation: the risk was significantly greater for oral estrogen-progestin than oral estrogen-only therapy (RR = 2.07 [95%CI, 1.86-2.31] vs. 1.42 [1.21-1.66]), with no increased risk with transdermal estrogen-only therapy (0.82 [0.64-1.06]). Among users of oral estrogen-progestin, the risk from HT varied by progestin type, with significantly greater risks for preparations containing medroxyprogesterone acetate than other progestins (2.67 [2.25-3.17] vs. 1.91 [1.69-2.17]; Pheterogeneity = 0.0007). Current users of oral HT at last reporting had twice the risk of VTE in the first 2 years after starting HT than later (Pheterogeneity = 0.0006). Associations were similar for deep vein thrombosis with and without pulmonary embolism. Over 5 years, 1 in 660 who had never used HT were admitted to hospital for (or died from) pulmonary embolism, compared with 1 in 475 current users of oral estrogen-only HT,1 in 390 users of estrogen-progestin HT containing norethisterone/norgestrel, and 1 in 250 users of estrogen-progestin HT containing medroxyprogesterone acetate.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of VTE varied considerably by HT formulation, being greatest in users of oral estrogen-progestin HT, especially formulations containing medroxyprogesterone acetate.

Does the route of administration for estrogen hormone therapy impact the risk of venous thromboembolism? Estradiol transdermal system versus oral estrogen-only hormone therapy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to quantify the magnitude of risk reduction for venous thromboembolism events associated with an estradiol transdermal system relative to oral estrogen-only hormone therapy agents.

METHODS

A claims analysis was conducted using the Thomson Reuters MarketScan database from January 2002 to October 2009. Participants 35 years or older who were newly using an estradiol transdermal system or an oral estrogen-only hormone therapy with two or more dispensings were analyzed. Venous thromboembolism was defined as one or more diagnosis codes for deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. Cohorts of estradiol transdermal system and oral estrogen-only hormone therapy were matched 1:1 based on both exact factor and propensity score matching, and an incidence rate ratio was used to compare the rates of venous thromboembolism between the matched cohorts. Remaining baseline imbalances from matching were included as covariates in multivariate adjustments.

RESULTS

Among the matched estradiol transdermal system and oral estrogen-only hormone therapy users (27,018 women in each group), the mean age of the cohorts was 48.9 years; in each cohort, 6,044 (22.4%) and 1,788 (6.6%) participants had a hysterectomy and an oophorectomy at baseline, respectively. A total of 115 estradiol transdermal system users developed venous thromboembolism, compared with 164 women in the estrogen-only hormone therapy cohort (unadjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.57-0.91; P = 0.006). After adjustment for confounding factors, the incidence of venous thromboembolism remained significantly lower for estradiol transdermal system users than for estrogen-only hormone therapy users.

CONCLUSIONS

This large population-based study suggests that participants receiving an estradiol transdermal system have a significantly lower incidence of venous thromboembolism than do participants receiving oral estrogen-only hormone therapy.

The effects of obesity on venous thromboembolism: A review

Obesity has emerged as a global health issue that is associated with wide spectrum of disorders, including coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, stroke, and venous thromboembolism (VTE). VTE is one of the most common vascular disorders in the United States and Europe and is associated with significant mortality. Although the association between obesity and VTE appears to be moderate, obesity can interact with other environmental or genetic factors and pose a significantly greater risk of VTE among individuals who are obese and who are exposed simultaneously to several other risk factors for VTE. Therefore, identification of potential interactions between obesity and certain VTE risk factors might offer some critical points for VTE interventions and thus minimize VTE morbidity and mortality among patients who are obese. However, current obesity measurements have limitations and can introduce contradictory results in the outcome of obesity. To overcome these limitations, this review proposes several future directions and suggests some avenues for prevention of VTE associated with obesity as well.

Are all estrogens created equal? A review of oral vs. transdermal therapy

BACKGROUND

To compare oral and transdermal delivery systems in domains of lipid effects; cardiovascular, inflammatory, and thrombotic effects; effect on insulin-like growth factor, insulin resistance, and metabolic syndrome; sexual effects; metabolic effects including weight; and effects on target organs bone, breast, and uterus.

METHODS

Review of the literature 1990-2010. Studies selected on basis of applicability, quality of data, and relationship to topic.

RESULTS

Data applicable to the comparisons of oral versus transdermal delivery systems for postmenopausal estrogen therapy were utilized to perform a review and formulate conclusions.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant differences appear to exist between oral and transdermal estrogens in terms of hormonal bioavailability and metabolism, with implications for clinical efficacy, potential side effects, and risk profile of different hormone therapy options, but neither results nor study designs are uniform. Bypassing hepatic metabolism appears to result in more stable serum estradiol levels without supraphysiologic concentrations in the liver. By avoiding first-pass metabolism, transdermal hormone therapy may have less pronounced effects on hepatic protein synthesis, such as inflammatory markers, markers of coagulation and fibrinolysis, and steroid binding proteins, while oral hormone therapy has more pronounced hyper-coagulant effects and increases synthesis of C-reactive protein and fibrinolytic markers. Both oral and transdermal delivery systems have beneficial effects on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratios (oral>transdermal), while the transdermal system has more favorable effects on triglycerides. Incidence of metabolic syndrome and weight gain appears to be slightly lower with a transdermal delivery system. Oral estrogen's significant increase in hepatic sex hormone binding globulin production lowers testosterone availability compared with transdermal delivery, with clinically relevant effects on sexual vigor.

[Comparison of two different types of hormone therapy effects on haemostatic parameters in early postmenopausal women]

INTRODUCTION

Most postmenopausal women have some of menopausal symptoms due to oestrogen deprivation. Many therapeutic options are available for managing menopausal problems. However, hormone therapy is associated with a heightened risk for thromboembolic events.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of different types of hormone therapy on some haemostatic parameters.

METHODS

This randomized, controlled study included 56 healthy, early postmenopausal women aged 46-58 years on different types of hormone therapy (tibolone 2.5 mg/day, 25 women, or CCHT 2 mg estradiol plus 1 mg norethisteron acetate, 31 women) and 20 healthy postmenopausal women of the same age receiving placebo. Effects of these 2 medicaments on some haemostasis parameters were measured 3 and 6 months after the onset of treatment.

RESULTS

Short-term use (3 months) of both tibolone and CCHT had a detrimental effect on antithrombin, protein C and protein S levels (decreased), and even more so in the group treated with CCHT. Plasminogen-activator inhibitor type 1 levels were decreased by both tibolone and CCHT, but more so by CCHT; thrombin-antithrombin complex were increased in both groups. There were no changes in haemostatic parameters between 3-month and 6-month treatment in any group.

CONCLUSION

Both therapeutic options are associated with an activation of thrombogenic and fibrinolytic markers within 3 months of use. Tibolone appears to produce a better balance between thrombogenesis and fibrinolysis. Since our results show a lower incidence of thrombotic events, further studies are required.

EMAS position statement: Managing menopausal women with a personal or family history of VTE

INTRODUCTION

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a serious cardiovascular event whose incidence rises with increasing age.

AIMS

To formulate a position statement on the management of the menopause in women with a personal or family history of VTE.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Literature review and consensus of expert opinion.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Randomized controlled trials have shown an increased risk of VTE in oral hormone therapy (HT) users. There are no randomized trial data on the effect of transdermal estrogen on VTE. Recent observational studies and meta-analyses suggest that transdermal estrogen does not increase VTE risk. These clinical observations are supported by experimental data showing that transdermal estrogen has a minimal effect on hepatic metabolism of hemostatic proteins as the portal circulation is bypassed. A personal or family history of VTE, especially in individuals with a prothrombotic mutation, is a strong contraindication to oral HT but transdermal estrogen can be considered after careful individual evaluation of the benefits and risks. Transdermal estrogen should be also the first choice in overweight/obese women requiring HT. Observational studies suggest that micronized progesterone and dydrogesterone might have a better risk profile than other progestins with regard to VTE risk. Although these findings should be confirmed by randomized clinical trials, they strongly suggest that both the route of estrogen administration and the type of progestin may be important determinants of the overall benefit-risk profile of HT.

Metabolic and hormonal parameters in post-menopausal women 10 years after transdermal oestradiol treatment, alone or combined to micronized oral progesterone

BACKGROUND

In the post-Women's Health Initiative Study era few post-menopausal women complete long term hormonal treatment (HT).

OBJECTIVE

To analyse metabolic/hormonal parameters and frequency of the metabolic syndrome (METS) in post-menopausal women after 10 years of HT.

METHODS

Retrospective data from parallel cohorts of post-menopausal women receiving HT for 10 years was analysed. Regimens included: transdermal oestradiol (50 microg) (n=22), sequential cyclic HT with transdermal oestradiol (50 microg) plus 200 mg/day micronized oral progesterone (cycle days 12-25) (n=83), or continuous combined HT with transdermal oestradiol (50 microg) plus 100 mg/day micronized oral progesterone (n=46). A group of women who elected not to use HT served as a control group (n=35).

RESULTS

Frequency of the METS did not significantly increase after 10 years of HT. Oestradiol and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) levels displayed a significant increase compared to baseline after 10 years of HT (all regimens). These values were significant higher when compared to the control group. Glucose levels were significantly higher after 10 years in women receiving the sequential cyclic regimen. Although not reaching statistical significance, there was a trend for transdermal oestradiol alone to increase HDL-C and decrease triglyceride levels.

CONCLUSION

Serum oestradiol and SHBG levels were significantly higher after 10 years of transdermal oestradiol, alone or combined with micronized oral progesterone, without differences observed in serum metabolic parameters. More research through randomised clinical trials is required.

Transdermal hormone therapy and the risk of stroke and venous thrombosis

Recent case-control and cohort studies have indicated that the transdermal administration of postmenopausal estrogen therapy is not associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular complications, specifically stroke and venous thrombosis. These studies have prompted the clinical promotion of transdermal treatment as 'safer'. There are reasons, however, to be cautious regarding postmenopausal transdermal hormone therapy, especially in regard to stroke. Previous reports linking postmenopausal estrogen therapy and the risk of stroke have not yielded consistent results, finding it difficult to adjust for all confounding factors, including compliance with treatment. Age of the population studies may be a critical issue. Notably, the risk of stroke with oral estrogen was not increased in the Women's Health Initiative when women with prior cardiovascular disease or those older than 60 years were excluded. There does appear to be a dose-response relationship with stroke, similar to that observed with estrogen-progestin contraceptives, and this may be a problem when studying standard doses of transdermal treatment, in that many women receiving transdermal estrogen display lower estrogen blood levels when compared with oral treatment. Clinicians should administer low doses of estrogen to women with risk factors for stroke, and the transdermal route of administration is indicated for women at high risk for venous thrombosis and for older postmenopausal women, especially for women with stroke risk factors. In a recent study, Renoux and colleagues from McGill University in Montreal performed a nested case-control study deriving the data from a cohort of women in the UK General Practice Research Database (GPRD). Current use of oral and transdermal hormone therapy, based on recorded prescriptions, was compared to no use in 15 710 cases and 59 958 controls. The adjusted rate ratio (RR) for stroke for current use of transdermal estrogens, with or without a progestin, was not increased (RR 0.95; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75-1.20) compared with a significant increase associated with oral estrogen, with or without a progestin (RR 1.28; 95% CI 1.15-1.42). This would amount to an attributal risk of 0.8 additional strokes per 1000 women per year. There was an indication of a dose-response relationship; a significant increase in risk was observed with transdermal estrogen doses greater than 50 microg. The case-control study by Renoux and colleagues is the first major analysis to compare transdermal and oral hormone therapy and conclude that, compared with an increased risk of stroke with oral therapy, there was no increased risk with transdermal treatment at a dose of 50 microg or less. This report is about as strong an observational study as can be achieved. Large numbers of cases (15 710) and controls (59 958) were available for analysis using the well-known UK GPRD. The use of this computerized database precludes selection bias by the investigators and recall bias by the women in the study. The results support the growing conventional wisdom that transdermal therapy at standard doses is free of the cardiovascular risks associated with oral therapy.

Transdermal menopausal hormone therapy: delivery through skin changes the rules

IMPORTANCE TO THE FIELD

Transdermal hormone therapy is replacing oral estrogens and androgens as safe enhancements of life quality for postmenopausal women. Estradiol and testosterone are dosed into the microvascular circulation directly through skin so there is no first-pass hepatic transformation or deactivation of the dosed estradiol or testosterone.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

This review critically examines recent clinical trials describing experience with transdermal estradiol and testosterone in postmenopausal women. Transdermal estradiol is effective in the treatment of vasomotor symptoms (VMS) and can provide its benefits at higher levels of safety than have been heretofore possible with oral estrogens. Transdermal testosterone is effective in the treatment of hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD) documented in multiple, well-powered randomized clinical trials with demonstrated high levels of safety.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

The reader will learn that transdermal estradiol and testosterone, in properly selected postmenopausal women, significantly and safely enhance life quality, are likely to become increasingly popular, and will probably replace oral hormone therapy.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Transdermal delivery of native estradiol for VMS and testosterone for HSDD has significant advantages in safety and efficacy over traditional oral preparations which are now available for clinical use.

Factors associated with positive D-dimer results in patients evaluated for pulmonary embolism

OBJECTIVES

Available D-dimer assays have low specificity and may increase radiographic testing for pulmonary embolism (PE). To help clinicians better target testing, this study sought to quantify the effect of risk factors for a positive quantitative D-dimer in patients evaluated for PE.

METHODS

This was a prospective, multicenter, observational study. Emergency department (ED) patients evaluated for PE with a quantitative D-dimer were eligible for inclusion. The main outcome of interest was a positive D-dimer. Odds ratio (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were determined by multivariable logistic regression. Adjusted estimates of relative risk were also calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 4,346 patients had D-dimer testing, of whom 2,930 (67%) were women. A total of 2,500 (57%) were white, 1,474 (34%) were black or African American, 238 (6%) were Hispanic, and 144 (3%) were of other race or ethnicity. The mean (+/-SD) age was 48 (+/-17) years. Overall, 1,903 (44%) D-dimers were positive. Model fit was adequate (c-statistic = 0.739, Hosmer and Lemeshow p-value = 0.13). Significant positive predictors of D-dimer positive included female sex; increasing age; black (vs. white) race; cocaine use; general, limb, or neurologic immobility; hemoptysis; hemodialysis; active malignancy; rheumatoid arthritis; lupus; sickle cell disease; prior venous thromboembolism (VTE; not under treatment); pregnancy and postpartum state; and abdominal, chest, orthopedic, or other surgery. Warfarin use was protective. In contrast, several variables known to be associated with PE were not associated with positive D-dimer results: body mass index (BMI), estrogen use, family history of PE, (inactive) malignancy, thrombophilia, trauma within 4 weeks, travel, and prior VTE (under treatment).

CONCLUSIONS

Many factors are associated with a positive D-dimer test. The effect of these factors on the usefulness of the test should be considered prior to ordering a D-dimer.

Hormone replacement therapy and the risk of venous thromboembolism: a population-based study

SUMMARY BACKGROUND

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) using oral estrogen alone or combined with a progestogen is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in postmenopausal women. This risk may differ for tibolone and transdermal HRT.

METHODS

Among the United Kingdom's General Practice Research Database, we identified the cohort of all women aged 50-79 between 1 January 1987 and 1 March 2008. Using a nested case-control approach, all incident cases of VTE occurring during the study period were identified and matched with up to 10 controls selected from the cohort members. Rate ratios (RR) of VTE with current use of tibolone, transdermal and oral HRT were estimated using conditional logistic regression.

RESULTS

The cohort of 955 582 postmenopausal women included 23 505 cases of VTE matched with 231 562 controls. The risk of VTE was not increased with current use of transdermal estrogen alone (RR 1.01; 95% CI, 0.89-1.16) or combined with a progestogen (RR 0.96; 95% CI, 0.77-1.20), or with current use of tibolone (RR 0.92; 95% CI: 0.77-1.10), relative to non-use. On the other hand, the risk was increased with current use of oral estrogen (RR 1.49; 95% CI, 1.37-1.63) and oral estrogen-progestogen (RR 1.54; 95% CI, 1.44-1.65), and increased with estrogen dosage. The risks with oral formulations were particularly elevated during the first year of use but disappeared 4 months after discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

Transdermal HRT and tibolone were not associated with an increased risk of VTE in postmenopausal women.