The flow cytometric VASP assay can be used to determine the effectiveness of clopidogrel in patients treated with abciximab

High-on-treatment platelet reactivity predicts adverse outcome after carotid artery stenting: A prospective study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

High-on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) has been established as a predictor of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), but no data are available on its predictive value in patients on DAPT after carotid artery stenting (CAS). We aimed to evaluate the possible association between HTPR in patients on aspirin plus clopidogrel therapy after CAS and subsequent MACE.

METHODS

All consecutive patients treated with CAS in a single institution were enrolled in a prospective clinical study. HTPR was evaluated with 5 different laboratory assays carried out just before CAS. MACE incidence (cerebral ischemia, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, acute limb ischemia and vascular death) was evaluated at 30 days and thereafter at yearly visits.

RESULTS

A total of 300 patients were enrolled in the study, and eight were then excluded because blood samples resulted unsuitable for the laboratory testing or CAS aborted for technical problems. Median follow-up was 5.8 years and during this period 47 MACE occurred. HTPR detected by multiplate electronic aggregometry (MEA) and the VASP phosphorylation assay (VASP) were associated with a significantly enhanced risk of MACE (p = 0.048 and p = 0.038, respectively). However, HTPR to three tests (HTPR3) was more strongly predictive of increased risk of a vascular event at follow up (p = 0.005) at bivariate analysis and also at Cox regression multivariate analysis (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

HTPR to three different assays (mainly to VASP + PFA P2Y+ VerifyNow) in patients on DAPT after CAS has predictive value for subsequent MACE. Prospective studies to assess whether platelet function testing-guided antiplatelet therapy is superior to standard DAPT in patient undergoing CAS should be considered.

Predictive Value of Methods Measuring Platelet Activation for Ischemic Events in Patients Receiving Clopidogrel: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

This study investigates the efficiency and predictive value of light-transmission aggregometry (LTA), vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) and VerifyNow for ischemia in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Studies that used LTA, VASP or VerifyNow to predict ischemia were included, and their quality and efficiency were analyzed using Review Manager 5.3. The sensitivity and specificity of subgroup studies based on the outcome, cut-off value, and follow-up days were calculated and the summary ROC (sROC) curves were compared after having been fitted. Thirty-one studies including a total of 17,314 participants were analyzed. LTA, VASP and VerifyNow presented a considerable efficiency in predicting ischemic clinical events. In the subgroup analysis, the sensitivities of LTA, VASP and VerifyNow in predicting cardiac death, all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, and revascularization were 0.40/0.63/0.62, 0.47/0.56/0.39, 0.40/0.48/0.60, 0.44/0.58/0.70, 0.29/not applicable/0.60 and 0.44/0.57/0.37, respectively and the specificities of LTA, VASP, and VerifyNow were 0.85/0.48/0.63, 0.73/0.52/0.63, 0.74/0.55/0.64, 0.75/0.47/0.61, 0.72/not applicable/ 0.61, and 0.70/0.47/0.67, respectively. LTA showed a higher sensitivity in predicting the outcomes over six months than those within six months, while VerifyNow prediction sensitivity was found to be higher within six months. Meanwhile, VerifyNow showed no statistically significant higher AUC of sROC in comparison to LTA and VASP in predicting ischemic events in patients undergoing clopidogrel treatment. The cut-off values of LTA, VASP and VerifyNow were suggested to be 56%, 50% and 235 respectively according to our study.

Candidate gene and pathway analyses identifying genetic variations associated with prasugrel pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics

AIM

We aimed to investigate the genetic polymorphisms and pharmacogenetic variability associated with the pharmacodynamics (PD) and pharmacokinetics (PK) of prasugrel, in healthy Han Chinese subjects.

PATIENTS & METHODS

Healthy, native, Han Chinese subjects (n = 36) aged 18 to 45 years with unknown genotypes were included. All subjects received a loading dose (LD) on day 1 and a maintenance dose (MD) from day 2 until day 11. Candidate gene association and gene-set analysis of biological pathways related to prasugrel and platelet activity were analyzed.

RESULTS

28 SNPs of 17 candidate genes previously associated with prasugrel or platelet activity were selected after a literature search. In the 30 mg LD groups (n = 24), ITGA2-rs28095 was found to be significantly associated with the P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) value at 24 h after the LD (p = 0.015). 165 study genes related to platelet activation-related processes and prasugrel activity were selected from the MSigDB database, including curated gene sets from KEGG, Bio Carta, and Gene Cards. 14 SNPs of 9 genes were found to be significantly correlated both at 24 h and 12 days after LD: ADAMTSL1, PRKCA, ITPR2, P2RY12, P2RY14, PLCB4, PRKG1, ADCY1, and LYN. Seven SNPs of 6 protein-coding genes associated with area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-tlast) were significantly identified among the 47 selected genes, including ADAMTSL1, CD36, P2RY1, PCSK9, PON1, and SCD.

CONCLUSION

These results show that genetic variation affects the PK and PD of prasugrel in normal individuals. Further studies with larger sample sizes are required to explore whether the SNPs are associated only with prasugrel activity or also with cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality.

Multiple electrode aggregometry and vasodilator stimulated phosphoprotein-phosphorylation assay in clinical routine for prediction of postprocedural major adverse cardiovascular events

Reduced antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel assessed with multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) and vasodilator stimulated phosphoprotein-phosphorylation (VASP-P) assay has been proven to predict major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after coronary stenting. So far no consecutive registry has evaluated the usefulness of different adenosine diphosphate-based platelet function tests to predict outcome in unselected patients. Hence, our objective was to determine the feasibility of MEA and VASP-P for clinical routine and whether low-response to clopidogrel as determined by MEA and/or the VASP-P assays predicts MACE in a “real-life” population undergoing coronary stenting. Threehundred consecutive patients were included in this prospective registry. Blood was sampled 6–24 hours after stenting to measure MEA and VASP-P. The use of glycoprotein-IIb/IIIa-blockers limited MEA to 196 measurements. Concerning the VASP-P assay, 300 measurements were achieved. Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC)-curves of sensitivity and specificity estimates for MACE were plotted for VASP-P assay. The area under the ROC-curve was 0.683 (p=0.014) for the platelet reactivity index (PRI) calculated from median fluorescence intensities (FI) with an optimal cut-off at 60.2% PRI. Patients above 60.2% had a significantly increased risk for MACE at six months follow-up (p=0.007). Estimating the cut-offs for the PRI from mean FI (52%) or from geometric mean FI (56.6%) led to clinically relevant differences. VASP-P assay is feasible for clinical routine to measure clopidogrel effects and to predict post-procedural MACE in unselected patients. With regard to differing cut-offs, exact standardisation of the VASP-P assay is mandatory. The use of GP-IIb/IIIa-blockers prevents MEA testing and limits its usability in unselected patients.

Comparison of current platelet functional tests for the assessment of aspirin and clopidogrel response

The two most widely used antiplatelet drugs in the world are aspirin and clopidogrel. However, some patients on aspirin and/or clopidogrel therapy do not respond appropriately to either aspirin or clopidogrel. This phenomenon is usually called “aspirin/clopidogrel resistance”. Several platelet function tests have been used in various studies for the assessment of aspirin and clopidogrel resistance in healthy individuals and patients admitted in cardiology departments. An accurate assessment of platelet response to aspirin/clopidogrel could benefit patients by proposing tailored-antiplatelet therapy based on test results. However, there is a clear lack of standardisation of such techniques and their analytical variability may induce misinterpretation. After a quick report of the mechanisms responsible for aspirin/clopidogrel resistance, we describe the pre-analytical aspects and the analytical performances of current platelet function tests (Light-transmission aggregometry, whole-blood aggregometry, VerifyNow®, Platelet Function Analyzer®, thromboelastography, VASP assay) that are used for the assessment of aspirin/clopidogrel resistance in clinical studies. Considering the different variables that have to be taken into account with each of the platelet function tests, a particular attention should be paid when interpreting results.

Vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein-phosphorylation assay in patients on clopidogrel: does standardisation matter?

The vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein-phosphorylation (VASP-P) flow-cytometric assay is mainly used in clinical trials to measure thienopyridine effects. However, there are remarkable differences in the reported optimal cut-offs, ranging from 48-61% platelet reactivity index (PRI). We therefore investigated whether a lack of standardisation might explain the differences in the cut-offs. We measured VASP-P in 62 individuals. PRI was calculated using the mean, geometric mean and median fluorescence intensities (FI). Stability of the blood-samples (time-to-assay, 0-2 days) and stability of the processed samples (0-120 minutes) within the recommended time-span were tested. Time-to-assay significantly influenced the PRI (p<0.001): the PRI from mean FI after two days was lower compared to values on day 1 (52 ± 22.9 vs. 57.7 ± 24.1, p<0.001). The PRI from the geometric mean FI after two days was lower compared to day 0 as well as day 1 (51.3 ± 23 vs. 58.2 ± 24.2 and vs. 59.1 ± 23.7, both p<0.001). The PRI from median FI was stable over time (day 0: 59.1 ± 25%, day 1: 59.7 ± 24.1% and day 2: 56.4 ± 23.9%, all p=ns). Furthermore, the lag time of the processed samples significantly altered the PRI (all p<0.001) with a maximum difference for PRI based on geometric mean FI after 90 minutes compared to baseline (Δ=3.92%PRI, p<0.001). The differences in the reported cut-offs might be explained by a lack of standardisation. More precise standardisation is inevitable, as the PRI significantly depends on the method of calculation, the time-to-assay as well as on the lag time after processing. Tolerably stable results were obtained for the PRI from the median FI.

Platelet function testing in hirudin and BAPA anticoagulated blood

BACKGROUND

Sodium citrate is the most commonly used anticoagulant for platelet function testing. However, the use of citrated blood for platelet function analysis has been criticized due to creation of a non-physiological milieu. Moreover, platelet function measurements performed with citrated blood need to be completed within 4 h after blood collection. Alternatively, hirudin and recently, a dual thrombin/factor Xa inhibitor benzylsulfonyl-D-Arg-Pro-4-amidinobenzylamide (BAPA), can be used to improve the reactivity after prolonged storage of platelets. The present study investigated platelet function tests using hirudin and BAPA anticoagulated blood.

METHODS

Blood was obtained from 30 healthy individuals and 20 patients on aspirin or clopidogrel therapy, and stored for 2, 12, 24 or 48 h. Light transmission aggregometry and impedance platelet aggregometry were performed using adenosine 5-diphosphate (ADP) and arachidonic acid as agonists. The vasodilator stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation assay was evaluated.

RESULTS

Platelet aggregation measurements of healthy individuals and patients showed stable platelet aggregation values induced by arachidonic acid, after 24 h, when hirudin or BAPA anticoagulated blood was used. However, citrated blood resulted in significantly reduced platelet response after 12 h. ADP-induced light transmission aggregation of healthy individuals and patients exhibited unchanged platelet aggregation after 12 h using hirudin or BAPA anticoagulated blood, while significantly reduced platelet response was observed after 12 h when using citrated blood. In contrast, measurement of ADP-induced aggregation by use of impedance aggregometry resulted in reduced stability over 12 h using hirudin or BAPA anticoagulated blood. The VASP assay exhibited no significant changes in results over a storage period of 48 h, independent of the anticoagulants used.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of hirudin or BAPA anticoagulated blood resulted in improvement of stability of platelet function measurements.

A protein phosphorylation-based assay for screening and monitoring of drugs modulating cyclic nucleotide pathways

Cyclic nucleotide regulation is an important target for drug development, particularly for treatment and prophylaxis of cardiovascular diseases. Determination of cyclic nucleotide levels for screening and monitoring of cyclic nucleotide modulating drug action is necessary, yet the techniques available are cumbersome and not sufficiently accurate. Here we present an approach based on the detection of cyclic nucleotide-dependent protein phosphorylation. By use of a common substrate of cyclic nucleotide-dependent protein kinases, the protein vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) featuring two phosphorylation sites specifically phosphorylated by these kinases, an assay was developed for the monitoring of intracellular cyclic nucleotide levels. The assay was tested with human platelets ex vivo treated with stimulants of nucleotide cyclases, kinases, and phosphodiesterase inhibitors. Phosphorylation of the protein VASP correlates with intracellular cyclic nucleotide concentration (R(2)>0.90 for cGMP and cAMP); however, VASP phosphorylation is more sensitive to elevated cyclic nucleotide levels and significantly more stable over time. Quantification of VASP phosphorylation offers a reliable and robust tool for fast and easy monitoring of cyclic nucleotide levels and is also applicable to unprocessed biological matrices. Owing to these properties, VASP is a promising biomarker for screening and monitoring of cyclic nucleotide modulating drugs.

Platelet function tests for the monitoring of P2Y12 inhibitors

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

The individual response to clopidogrel therapy is unpredictable, resulting in high on-treatment platelet reactivity in a substantial number of patients. Moreover, consistent findings across multiple investigations point out that a strong relationship exists between high on-treatment platelet reactivity and the occurrence of atherothrombotic events.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

This paper describes the current available methods of platelet function evaluation, including their advantages and drawbacks, reviews the evidence for the relation between high on-treatment platelet reactivity and clinical outcome, and discusses data concerning the clinical implications of platelet function testing in patients treated with thienopyridine therapy.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

The reader will be introduced to platelet function testing and its clinical applicability. The reader will gain a better understanding of the techniques used and will learn how to interpret the numerous data on platelet function testing and clinical outcome.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Although a growing body of evidence demonstrates the promising potential of platelet function tests in predicting atherothrombotic events post stenting, platelet function testing should not yet be used routinely, as adequate treatment of high on-treatment platelet reactivity is unknown.

Which platelet function test is suitable to monitor clopidogrel responsiveness? A pharmacokinetic analysis on the active metabolite of clopidogrel

BACKGROUND

Multiple platelet function tests claim to be P2Y12-pathway specific and capable of capturing the biological activity of clopidogrel.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present study was to determine which platelet function test provides the best reflection of the in vivo plasma levels of the active metabolite of clopidogrel (AMC).

PATIENTS/METHODS

Clopidogrel-naive patients scheduled for elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) received a 600 mg loading dose of clopidogrel and 100 mg of aspirin. For pharmacokinetic analysis, blood was drawn at 0, 20, 40, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240 and 360 min after clopidogrel loading and peak plasma concentrations (C(max)) of the AMC were quantified with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Platelet function testing was performed at baseline and 360 min after the clopidogrel loading.

RESULTS

The VASP-assay, the VerifyNow P2Y12-assay and 20 micromol L(-1) adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) showed strong correlations with C(max) of the AMC (VASP: R(2) = 0.56, P < 0.001; VerifyNow platelet reactivity units (PRU): R(2) = 0.48, P < 0.001; VerifyNow %inhibition: R(2) = 0.59, P < 0.001; 20 micromol L(-1) ADP-induced LTA: R(2) = 0.47, P < 0.001). Agreement with C(max) of the AMC was less evident for 5 micromol L(-1) ADP-induced LTA or whole blood aggregometry (WBA), whereas the IMPACT-R ADP test did not show any correlation with plasma levels of the AMC.

CONCLUSION

The flow cytometric VASP-assay, the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay and, although to a lesser extent, 20 micromol L(-1) ADP-induced LTA correlate best with the maximal plasma level of the AMC, suggesting these may be the preferred platelet function tests for monitoring the responsiveness to clopidogrel.

High loading dose of clopidogrel is unable to satisfactorily inhibit platelet reactivity in patients with glycoprotein IIIA gene polymorphism: a genetic substudy of PRAGUE-8 trial

The study aimed to assess the impact of nine polymorphisms of genes encoding platelet receptors, enzymes, and hemostatic factors on clopidogrel efficacy to inhibit platelet reactivity in patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing elective coronary angiography either with or without ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention. The study was performed as a genetic substudy of the PRAGUE-8 trial. Ninety-five patients pretreated with 600 mg clopidogrel at least 6 h prior to coronary angiography were tested. Baseline platelet reactivity to ADP was assessed before the drug was administered. Clopidogrel efficacy was tested again at 12 and 28 h after administration. Polymorphisms of platelet receptors, glycoprotein (GP) Ia (807C/T), GPVI (13254C/T), GPIIIa (PlA1/PlA2), PAR-1 (IVSn-14A/T), P2Y12 (32C/T), P2Y12 (H1/H2) haplotype, gene variations of cyclooxygenase-1, Leiden, and factor II mutations were studied. Flow cytometric tests of vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation states were used as a measure of drug efficacy. None of the gene polymorphisms influenced baseline ADP-induced platelet reactivity significantly. Twenty-eight hours after drug administration, differences in suppression of ADP-induced platelet reactivity were observed between polymorphism-positive and polymorphism-negative patients. Inhibition of platelet reactivity, after 600 mg of clopidogrel, was significantly less in carriers of PlA2 (P=0.009) for mean decrease in platelet reactivity index. The proportion of clopidogrel nonresponders (platelet reactivity index >50%) was apparently higher in PlA2 carriers in comparison with PlA1/PlA1 patients (54 vs. 24%, P=0.082). A 600 mg loading dose of clopidogrel failed to acceptably inhibit platelet reactivity in patients who were positive for the PlA2 polymorphism.