Impact of plasma von Willebrand factor levels in the diagnosis of type 1 von Willebrand disease: results from a multicenter European study (MCMDM-1VWD)

ASH ISTH NHF WFH 2021 guidelines on the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease

BACKGROUND

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder known in humans. Accurate and timely diagnosis presents numerous challenges.

OBJECTIVE

These evidence-based guidelines of the American Society of Hematology (ASH), the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH), the National Hemophilia Foundation (NHF), and the World Federation of Hemophilia (WFH) are intended to support patients, clinicians, and other health care professionals in their decisions about VWD diagnosis.

METHODS

ASH, ISTH, NHF, and WFH established a multidisciplinary guideline panel that included 4 patient representatives and was balanced to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The Outcomes and Implementation Research Unit at the University of Kansas Medical Center (KUMC) supported the guideline-development process, including performing or updating systematic evidence reviews up to 8 January 2020. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The panel used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, including GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks, to assess evidence and make recommendations, which were subsequently subject to public comment.

RESULTS

The panel agreed on 11 recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

Key recommendations of these guidelines include the role of bleeding-assessment tools in the assessment of patients suspected of VWD, diagnostic assays and laboratory cutoffs for type 1 and type 2 VWD, how to approach a type 1 VWD patient with normalized levels over time, and the role of genetic testing vs phenotypic assays for types 2B and 2N. Future critical research priorities are also identified.

[Von Willebrand disease]

Von Willebrand factor is involved in primary hemostasis (adhesion of platelets to subendothelium and platelet aggregation) and acts as the carrier of coagulation factor VIII. Von Willebrand disease, resulting from a quantitative or qualitative defect of this factor, is the most frequent inherited bleeding disorder. It is mainly responsible for symptoms such as mucocutaneous bleeding and excessive bleeding after trauma or invasive procedures, but can also cause gastro-intestinal bleeding or hemarthrosis in the most severe forms of the disease. There are numerous causes of physiological variation of von Willebrand factor plasma levels which can be responsible for diagnostic difficulty or changes in symptoms over time. Diagnosis relies primarily on clinical symptoms but requires the use of several laboratory analyses: von Willebrand factor activity and antigen testing and factor VIII activity. More specialized assays allow classification of the disease in various types and subtypes which imply different management strategies (types 1, 2A, 2B, 2M, 2N, and 3). Treatment is based on desmopressin, responsible for an increase in plasma concentration of von Willebrand factor, and plasma-derived von Willebrand factor concentrates which can be combined with factor VIII.

High proportion of patients with bleeding of unknown cause in persons with a mild-to-moderate bleeding tendency: Results from the Vienna Bleeding Biobank (VIBB)

INTRODUCTION

Data on clinical characteristics and the prevalence of underlying coagulopathies in patients with mild-to-moderate bleeding disorders (MBDs) are scarce.

AIM

We established the Vienna Bleeding Biobank (VIBB) to characterize and thoroughly investigate Austrian patients with MBDs.

RESULTS

Four hundred eighteen patients (female = 345, 82.5%) were included. A platelet function defect (PFD) was diagnosed in 26 (6.2%) and a possible PFD in 30 (7.2%) patients. Eight patients (1.9%) were diagnosed with von Willebrand disease (VWD) (type 1 n = 6; type 2 n = 2), and 29 patients had low VWF (30-50 IU/dL). Deficiencies in factor VIII, IX, XI or XIII were found in 11 (2.6%), 3 (0.7%), 3 (0.7%) and 1 patient(s), 2 patients had dysfibrinogenaemia, and further 2 had possible PFD and FXI deficiency. Probable causal mutations were detected in 8 of 11 patients with FVIII deficiency, 2 of 3 patients with FIX deficiency and 2 of 8 patients with VWD. Three hundred three patients (72.5%) had normal results in the coagulation assays and were categorized as patients with bleeding of unknown cause (BUC). The bleeding score did not differ between patients with and without established diagnosis. A diagnosis of a bleeding disorder was more frequently made in men than in women (49.3% vs 22.9%). Male sex (OR 3.55, 95% CI: 2.02-6.22; P < .001) and blood group 0 (OR 1.86, 95% CI: 1.17-2.94; P = .008) were independently associated with diagnosis of a bleeding disorder.

CONCLUSION

The high rate of patients with BUC despite in-depth haemostatic assessment underlines the incompleteness of available routine laboratory tests. Males with MBDs were more likely to be diagnosed with an established bleeding disorder than females.

Diagnostic and therapeutic medical devices for safer blood management in cardiac surgery: systematic reviews, observational studies and randomised controlled trials

Background

Anaemia, coagulopathic bleeding and transfusion are strongly associated with organ failure, sepsis and death following cardiac surgery.

Objective

To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of medical devices used as diagnostic and therapeutic tools for the management of anaemia and bleeding in cardiac surgery.

Methods and results

Workstream 1 – in the COagulation and Platelet laboratory Testing in Cardiac surgery (COPTIC) study we demonstrated that risk assessment using baseline clinical factors predicted bleeding with a high degree of accuracy. The results from point-of-care (POC) platelet aggregometry or viscoelastometry tests or an expanded range of laboratory reference tests for coagulopathy did not improve predictive accuracy beyond that achieved with the clinical risk score alone. The routine use of POC tests was not cost-effective. A systematic review concluded that POC-based algorithms are not clinically effective. We developed two new clinical risk prediction scores for transfusion and bleeding that are available as e-calculators. Workstream 2 – in the PAtient-SPecific Oxygen monitoring to Reduce blood Transfusion during heart surgery (PASPORT) trial and a systematic review we demonstrated that personalised near-infrared spectroscopy-based algorithms for the optimisation of tissue oxygenation, or as indicators for red cell transfusion, were neither clinically effective nor cost-effective. Workstream 3 – in the REDWASH trial we failed to demonstrate a reduction in inflammation or organ injury in recipients of mechanically washed red cells compared with standard (unwashed) red cells.

Limitations

Existing studies evaluating the predictive accuracy or effectiveness of POC tests of coagulopathy or near-infrared spectroscopy were at high risk of bias. Interventions that alter red cell transfusion exposure, a common surrogate outcome in most trials, were not found to be clinically effective.

Conclusions

A systematic assessment of devices in clinical use as blood management adjuncts in cardiac surgery did not demonstrate clinical effectiveness or cost-effectiveness. The contribution of anaemia and coagulopathy to adverse clinical outcomes following cardiac surgery remains poorly understood. Further research to define the pathogenesis of these conditions may lead to more accurate diagnoses, more effective treatments and potentially improved clinical outcomes.

Study registration

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN20778544 (COPTIC study) and PROSPERO CRD42016033831 (systematic review) (workstream 1); Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN23557269 (PASPORT trial) and PROSPERO CRD4201502769 (systematic review) (workstream 2); and Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN27076315 (REDWASH trial) (workstream 3).

Funding

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Programme Grants for Applied Research programme and will be published in full inProgramme Grants for Applied Research; Vol. 5, No. 17. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Plasma factor XIII level variations during menstrual cycle

Factor XIII (FXIII) has an important role in the control of bleeding through fibrin cross-linking; however, its effect within the menstrual cycle is not fully understood. The aim of this study was to examine changes in FXIII activity during the normal menstrual cycle and correlate FXIII activity with menstrual blood loss. A total of 32 healthy normal women of reproductive age were recruited. Menstrual blood loss was measured using the pictorial blood-assessment chart (PBAC). A bleeding score questionnaire was also completed. Blood samples were taken during the menstrual, proliferative, periovulatory, secretory and premenstrual phase for assessment of FXIII level. The mean ± SD FXIII level was lowest during menstrual and periovulatory phases (114 ± 23 and 114 ± 21 IU/dl, respectively). Mean FXIII level during the secretory and premenstrual phases were higher than the menstrual phase (P = 0.036). Mean secretory phase FXIII was also significantly higher compared with the periovulatory phase (P = 0.02). There was no significant correlation between FXIII level during the menstrual phase and age (P = 0.53) or PBAC score (P = 0.53). There were no significant differences in FXIII level during the menstrual phase between women with PBAC scores of at least 100 (n = 14; mean 116 IU/dl) and women with PBAC scores less than 100 (n = 18; mean 113 IU/dl). There was no correlation between FXIII level and bleeding score. FXIII activity was lower during menstrual and periovulatory phases of the cycle. However, the small difference between mean values (8 IU/dl) would be unlikely to have a significant impact on diagnosis of FXIII deficiency and clinical management.

Clinical and laboratory variability in a cohort of patients diagnosed with type 1 VWD in the United States

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder, and type 1 VWD is the most common VWD variant. Despite its frequency, diagnosis of type 1 VWD remains the subject of debate. In order to study the spectrum of type 1 VWD in the United States, the Zimmerman Program enrolled 482 subjects with a previous diagnosis of type 1 VWD without stringent laboratory diagnostic criteria. von Willebrand factor (VWF) laboratory testing and full-length VWF gene sequencing was performed for all index cases and healthy control subjects in a central laboratory. Bleeding phenotype was characterized using the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis bleeding assessment tool. At study entry, 64% of subjects had VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) or VWF ristocetin cofactor activity below the lower limit of normal, whereas 36% had normal VWF levels. VWF sequence variations were most frequent in subjects with VWF:Ag <30 IU/dL (82%), whereas subjects with type 1 VWD and VWF:Ag ≥30 IU/dL had an intermediate frequency of variants (44%). Subjects whose VWF testing was normal at study entry had a similar rate of sequence variations as the healthy controls (14%). All subjects with severe type 1 VWD and VWF:Ag ≤5 IU/dL had an abnormal bleeding score (BS), but otherwise BS did not correlate with VWF:Ag. Subjects with a historical diagnosis of type 1 VWD had similar rates of abnormal BS compared with subjects with low VWF levels at study entry. Type 1 VWD in the United States is highly variable, and bleeding symptoms are frequent in this population.

The Role of Bleeding History and Clinical Markers for the Correct Diagnosis of VWD

Quantification of the bleeding severity by use of bleeding assessment tools (BAT) and bleeding score (BS) has been consistently shown to improve the clinical diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD) while helping researchers establish phenotype/genotype correlations. Subjects with a BS equal or higher than 3 may be consider having a bleeding tendency, and should be referred for a laboratory investigation, particularly for VWD. In the diagnosis of type 1 VWD, the use of the BS has been shown to be highly specific (>95%) with reported sensitivities ranging from 40 to 100%. The BS is related to all available measurements of von Willebrand factor activity, including the PFA-100 closure time. Therefore, in clinical practice the use of BAT should always be the first step to standardize the assessment of patients with suspected VWD. The use of the recent ISTH consensus BAT is suggested to harmonize the collection of bleeding symptoms in patients with a suspected or confirmed hemostatic disorder, particularly VWD. The ISTH BAT is also coupled with a Web-based repository of bleeding symptoms, therefore providing an integrated framework for collaboration in the field of clinical evaluation of VWD and mild bleeding disorders.

Comparison of Thrombin Generation Assay With Conventional Coagulation Tests in Evaluation of Bleeding Risk in Patients With Rare Bleeding Disorders

Based on the premise that the capacity of plasma to generate thrombin in vitro is a comprehensive and precise functional test of the clotting system, we designed a cross-sectional, single-center study involving 83 patients with rare bleeding disorders (RBDs) to compare the usefulness of the thrombin generation (TG) assay versus conventional tests including prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) in predicting bleeding risk in patients with RBD in southern Iran. The TG parameters consisted of endogenous thrombin potential, lag time, peak, time to peak (ttPeak), and start tail. The area under the receiver–operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed statistically significant associations between bleeding risk and lag time, ttPeak, and start tail. We determined cutoff values for these 3 TG parameters and obtained a negative predictive value of 86% to 90% in patients with RBD who had a bleeding score (BS) ≤13. The ROC curves for the association of PT and aPTT with BS did not indicate any significant association. Correlation analysis supported the results of ROC curve analysis, only lag time, ttPeak, and start tail showed significant positive correlations with BS ( P < .05). Disease severity based on plasma factor activity was significantly associated with prolonged lag time and ttPeak and with prolonged PT ( P <.05). We suggest that TG assay is a potentially more useful tool for predicting the bleeding risk in patients with RBD. However, the small sample size in different RBD subgroups precluded subgroup analysis. Prospective multicenter studies with larger numbers of patients are therefore advisable.

VWF propeptide and ratios between VWF, VWF propeptide, and FVIII in the characterization of type 1 von Willebrand disease

During posttranslational modifications of von Willebrand factor (VWF), the VWF propeptide (VWFpp) is cleaved. The ratio between VWFpp and VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) and the ratio between factor VIII (FVIII:C) and VWF:Ag may be used to assess synthesis and clearance of VWF. We analyzed the contribution of VWFpp and ratios of VWFpp/VWF:Ag and FVIII:C/VWF:Ag in the pathophysiological characterization of type 1 von Willebrand disease (VWD) in the Molecular and Clinical Markers for the Diagnosis and Management of Type 1 VWD (MCMDM-1VWD) study. The VWFpp/VWF:Ag and FVIII:C/VWF:Ag ratios were increased among patients compared with unaffected family members and healthy controls. The VWFpp/VWF:Ag ratio was higher in individuals heterozygous for missense mutations than in those heterozygous for null alleles. In contrast, the FVIII:C/VWF:Ag ratio was highest among heterozygotes for VWF null alleles. The ratios of VWFpp/VWF:Ag and FVIII:C/VWF:Ag indicate that the pathophysiological mechanisms of type 1 VWD include reduced production and accelerated clearance of VWF, but that often a combination of both mechanisms is implicated.

Von Willebrand disease: an overview

Most commonly inherited bleeding disorder, first described in Aland Islands by Erik von Willebrand. It occurs as a result of decrease in plasma levels or defect in von Willebrand factor which is a large multimeric glycoprotein. Monomers of this glycoprotein undergo N-glycosylation to form dimers which get arranged to give multimers. Binding with plasma proteins (especially factor VIII) is the main function of von Willebrand factor. The disease is of two forms: Inherited and acquired forms. Inherited forms are of three major types. They are type 1, type 2, and type 3; in which type 2 is sub-divided into 2A, 2B, 2M, 2N. Type 1 is more prevalent than all other types. Mucocutaneous bleeding is mild in type 1 whereas it is mild to moderate in types 2A, 2B, and 2M. Type 2N has similar symptoms of haemophilia. The pathophysiology of each type depends on the qualitative or quantitative defects in von Willebrand factor. The diagnosis is based on von Willebrand factor antigen, von Willebrand factor activity assay, FVIII coagulant activity and some other additional tests. Results should be analyzed within the context of blood group. von Willebrand factor multimer analysis is essential for typing and sub typing the disease. The management of the disease involves replacement therapy, non-replacement therapy and other therapies that include antifibrinolytics and topical agents.

Effect of genetic variation in STXBP5 and STX2 on von Willebrand factor and bleeding phenotype in type 1 von Willebrand disease patients

Background

In type 1 von Willebrand Disease (VWD) patients, von Willebrand Factor (VWF) levels and bleeding symptoms are highly variable. Recently, the association between genetic variations in STXBP5 and STX2 with VWF levels has been discovered in the general population. We assessed the relationship between genetic variations in STXBP5 and STX2, VWF levels, and bleeding phenotype in type 1 VWD patients.

Methods

In 158 patients diagnosed with type 1 VWD according to the current ISTH guidelines, we genotyped three tagging-SNPs in STXBP5 and STX2 and analyzed their relationship with VWF:Ag levels and the severity of the bleeding phenotype, as assessed by the Tosetto bleeding score.

Results

In STX2, rs7978987 was significantly associated with VWF:Ag levels (bèta-coefficient (β) = −0.04 IU/mL per allele, [95%CI −0.07;−0.001], p = 0.04) and VWF:CB activity (β = −0.12 IU/mL per allele, [95%CI −0.17;−0.06], p<0.0001). For rs1039084 in STXBP5 a similar trend with VWF:Ag levels was observed: (β = −0.03 IU/mL per allele [95% CI −0.06;0.003], p = 0.07). In women, homozygous carriers of the minor alleles of both SNPs in STXBP5 had a significantly higher bleeding score than homozygous carriers of the major alleles. (Rs1039084 p = 0.01 and rs9399599 p = 0.02).

Conclusions

Genetic variation in STX2 is associated with VWF:Ag levels in patients diagnosed with type 1 VWD. In addition, genetic variation in STXBP5 is associated with bleeding phenotype in female VWD patients. Our findings may partly explain the variable VWF levels and bleeding phenotype in type 1 VWD patients.

Evaluation of the new INNOVANCE® PFA P2Y cartridge in patients with impaired primary haemostasis

Recently, the INNOVANCE® PFA P2Y (P2Y) cartridge of the PFA-100® system (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Marburg, Germany) has been developed for the monitoring of adenosine diphosphate (ADP) P2Y(12) receptor inhibition in patients under dual antiplatelet therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of pre-existing defects in primary haemostasis on the P2Y cartridge independent from specific antiplatelet medication. Therefore, the closure time (CT) of the P2Y cartridge was measured in a cohort of 176 patients with assumed bleeding disorders and compared with the results of established methods for the assessment of primary haemostasis. Von Willebrand disease (VWD) was found in 25 patients (14%). The detection rate of the P2Y cartridge regarding VWD was 64% and lower compared to the two conventional cartridges (collagen/epinephrine cartridge, CEPI, 80%; collagen/ADP cartridge, CADP, 76%). In the subgroup of VWD patients with VWF:RCo < 60 IU/dL (n = 22), the correlation analysis and the inter-rater agreement revealed only limited accordance with the two established cartridges. The correlation with the CADP cartridge (C(r) = 0.767, R(2) = 0.461; Kappa = 0.41) was higher than the correlation with the CEPI cartridge. Except for severe forms, platelet function disorders (9 patients, 5%) did not prolong the CT of the P2Y cartridge. Interestingly, the P2Y cartridge was less interference-prone to unspecific medications (23 patients, 13%). As the main conclusion, it must be taken into account that low von Willebrand factor activity can significantly influence the CTs of the P2Y cartridge when using it for the monitoring of antiplatelet therapy.

The influence of the ABO blood type on the distribution of von Willebrand factor in healthy children with no bleeding symptoms

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of ABO blood groups on von Willebrand factor-ristocetin cofactor activity (vWF-RCo) and on vWF-antigen (vWF-Ag) in children who have no personal or familial history of bleeding.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A survey and testing were performed on 200 children with no personal or familial history of bleeding. In all, 100 of them belonged to blood group O, and the remaining 100 belonged to other blood groups. The blood samples were stored at -80°C for a maximum period of 2 weeks to detect vWF-RCo and vWF-Ag levels.

RESULTS

The mean vWF-Ag (± 2 standard deviation [SD]) level in children with blood group O was 86% (± 20%); and for those with non-O blood group, it was 98.8% (± 25%). There was a significant difference between the 2 groups (P < .001). The mean vWF-RCo (± 2 SD) level in children with blood group O was 89% (± 23%); and for those with non-O blood group, it was 103% (± 17%). There was a significant difference between those in the 2 groups (P < .001). The lowest value of vWF-Ag and vWF-RCo levels in children with blood group O was found to be 50%. In conclusion, we showed that the selection of normal ranges based on the ABO group might influence the clinical diagnosis of vWD and that while the approach of using ABO group ranges for a vWF-Ag level lower than 50 IU/dL is scientifically sound, it might not be useful to assist a clinician in identifying people at increased risk of bleeding.

Advances in the diagnosis and management of type 1 von Willebrand disease

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is an autosomally inherited bleeding disorder caused by a deficiency and/or abnormality of von Willebrand factor (VWF). VWF is a multimeric adhesive protein that plays an important role in primary hemostasis by promoting platelet adhesion to the subendothelium at sites of vascular injury and platelet-platelet interactions at high-shear rate conditions. Furthermore, VWF is the carrier of factor VIII, thus indirectly contributing to the coagulation process. Most cases have a partial quantitative deficiency of VWF (type 1 VWD) with variable bleeding tendency, whereas qualitative variants (type 2 VWD), due to a dysfunctional VWF, are clinically more homogeneous and account for approximately 20-30% of cases. Type 3 VWD is rare and these patients have moderate-to-severe bleeding diathesis, display a recessive pattern of inheritance and virtual absence of VWF. The diagnosis of VWD may be difficult, especially in type 1 disease, since the laboratory phenotype of the disorder is very heterogeneous and confounded by the influence on VWF levels by factors outside the VWF gene (e.g., blood group). An array of tests are usually required to characterize the several types of the disorder in order to predict the best treatment modality. Desmopressin is the treatment of choice for most patients with type 1 VWD because it corrects the the dual defects of hemostasis, that is, abnormal coagulation expressed by low levels of factor VIII and abnormal platelet adhesion expressed by the reduction of VWF.

Application of UKHCDO 2004 guidelines in type 1 von Willebrand Disease--a single centre paediatric experience of the implications of altered or removed diagnosis

Diagnosis of type I von Willebrand Disease (VWD) can be challenging. In 2004, the United Kingdom Haemophilia Centre Doctors' Organisation (UKHCDO) proposed more stringent diagnostic criteria to replace the 1995 guidelines. To determine the true number of cases of type 1 VWD in a single paediatric centre, the 2004 UKHCDO Guideline for the diagnosis of VWD was used to evaluate 114 patients on our type 1 VWD register. Clinical and laboratory data were collected and analysed to see whether they met the criteria for type 1 VWD. Only 8% remained on the type 1 VWD register. 18% have been classified as 'possible type 1 VWD'. Twenty five surgical procedures have since been performed on patients from the group in which the diagnosis was removed without any haemostatic support or bleeding complications. Reaction to the removal of the VWD diagnosis or delivery of an alternative diagnosis was positive for most patients and families. This study is the first to assess the impact of the 2004 UKHCDO Guidelines on the diagnosis of VWD. It provides evidence that the prevalence of type 1 VWD may actually be closer to that of haemophilia instead of the previously reported 1-3% of the general population. We propose that all centres should review their patients with a diagnosis of VWD to revalidate this disease that claims to be our most common inherited bleeding disorder.

Establishment of reference intervals for von Willebrand factor antigen and eight coagulation factors in a Korean population following the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines

Establishment of reference intervals for coagulation molecules is important but is costly and sometimes not feasible. Since reference intervals from manufacturers or the literature are mostly out of date or involved Western populations, the authors determined reference intervals for VWF: Ag and eight factors in a Korean population. VWF: Ag, factor VIII (FVIII), FII, FV, FVII, FIX, FX, FXI, and FXII were determined in Korean individuals visiting for routine checkup following the CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute) guidelines. Reagents by Diagnostica Stago were used on the STA Compact Analyzer (Diagnostica Stago). Exclusion criteria were medical history or laboratory findings that could affect the factor levels. Influence of demographic factors was analyzed. Mean +/- 2 x SD or central 95 percentile was used, as appropriate. We obtained data from 266 adults for VWF: Ag, 371 adults for FVIII, and minimum 136 adults for the rest. Reference interval for VWF was 51-176% (52-155% in blood group O and 71-186% for non-O). Reference interval for FVIII was 64-197% (55-150% in O and 77-205% in non-O). Reference interval for FII was 77-121%, FV 81-160%, FVII 68-149%, FIX 67-154%, FX 69-126%, FXI 59-138%, and FXII 48-177%. The medians of VWF: Ag, FVIII, and FIX were significantly higher in the elderly group (> or =60 years). We established local reference intervals for VWF: Ag and eight coagulation factors in a Korean population according to the CLSI guidelines. Significantly, different reference intervals were obtained in blood group O vs. non-O for VWF: Ag and FVIII. The reference intervals obtained in this study could be adopted in other clinical laboratories after appropriate validation.

Common VWF exon 28 polymorphisms in African Americans affecting the VWF activity assay by ristocetin cofactor

The diagnosis of von Willebrand disease relies on abnormalities in specific tests of von Willebrand factor (VWF), including VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) and VWF ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo). When examining healthy controls enrolled in the T. S. Zimmerman Program for the Molecular and Clinical Biology of von Willebrand disease, we, like others, found a lower mean VWF:RCo compared with VWF:Ag in African American controls and therefore sought a genetic cause for these differences. For the African American controls, the presence of 3 exon 28 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), I1380V, N1435S, and D1472H, was associated with a significantly lower VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratio, whereas the presence of D1472H alone was associated with a decreased ratio in both African American and Caucasian controls. Multivariate analysis comparing race, SNP status, and VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratio confirmed that only the presence of D1472H was significant. No difference was seen in VWF binding to collagen, regardless of SNP status. Similarly, no difference in activity was seen using a GPIb complex-binding assay that is independent of ristocetin. Because the VWF:RCo assay depends on ristocetin binding to VWF, mutations (and polymorphisms) in VWF may affect the measurement of "VWF activity" by this assay and may not reflect a functional defect or true hemorrhagic risk.

How I treat von Willebrand disease

Recent multicenter studies have clarified the molecular basis underlying the different von Willebrand disease (VWD) types, all of which are caused by the deficiency and/or abnormality of von Willebrand factor (VWF). These studies have suggested a unifying pathophysiologic concept. The diagnosis of VWD, remains difficult because its clinical and laboratory phenotype is very heterogeneous and may overlap with normal subjects. Stringent criteria are therefore required for a clinically useful diagnosis. In this paper, we delineate a practical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of VWD. Our approach is based on the critical importance of a standardized bleeding history that has been condensed into a final bleeding score and a few widely available laboratory tests, such as VWF ristocetin cofactor activity, VWF antigen and factor VIII. This approach would help identify those subjects who will probably benefit from a diagnosis of VWD. The next step involves performing a trial infusion with desmopressin in all patients who fail to exhibit an enhanced responsiveness to ristocetin. On the basis of these results and through a series of illustrative examples, the clinician will be able to select the best approach for the optimal management of VWD, according to the patient's characteristics and clinical circumstances.

Gynaecological and obstetrical problems in women with different bleeding disorders

The aim of this case-control study was to analyse the prevalence of gynaecological, obstetrical and other more general bleeding symptoms in 114 women affected by various inherited bleeding disorders, who were compared with 114 apparently healthy women. Retrospective information were collected by means of two specific questionnaires, one on gynaecological and obstetrical bleeding symptoms, with special focus on the presence of menorrhagia as defined by a pictorial blood loss assessment chart (PBAC); and the other on general bleeding symptoms, whose severity was graded by means of the bleeding score (BS). Compared to normal women, the whole group of women with inherited bleeding disorders had a higher prevalence of excessive bleeding at menarche (25% vs. 5%, P < 0.0001) and menorrhagia (59% vs. 46%, P = 0.06). Affected women also had a higher frequency than controls of general bleeding symptoms that scored as severe by a BS > or = 12 (49% vs. 0%, P < 0.0001). In affected women, the BS increased according to the severity of the haemostasis defect. In conclusions, the BS and the PBAC are simple tools to evaluate the severity of general bleeding symptoms and menorrhagia in women with inherited bleeding disorders. These instruments may help to identify those women for whom a therapeutic intervention is warranted.

Applying diagnostic criteria for type 1 von Willebrand disease to a pediatric population

BACKGROUND

Definitive diagnosis of type 1 von Willebrand disease (VWD) remains elusive in clinical practice. Both the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) and the Hospital for Sick Children (HSC) have proposed diagnostic criteria for type 1 VWD, which include abnormal laboratory values, significant mucocutaneous bleeding history, and/or positive family history. The objective of this study was to apply ISTH and HSC criteria to a large pediatric population previously diagnosed with type 1 VWD. We hypothesized that a substantial number of patients would not meet these diagnostic criteria.

PROCEDURE

We performed a retrospective medical record review of all type 1 VWD patients at a single children's hospital. Frequencies of fit for ISTH and HSC diagnostic criteria were calculated.

RESULTS

Of 201 patients, 4.5% and 34% met the ISTH and HSC definitions, respectively. An additional 15% (ISTH) and 56% (HSC) met the definition of possible disease. For each definition, criteria for significant bleeding were most likely to be met, while criteria for abnormal laboratory values were least likely. When defined as simply VWF:Ag 5-20 IU/ml, as recently proposed by the ISTH, only 9% of patients met the definition of type 1 VWD.

CONCLUSIONS

ISTH criteria failed to identify the majority of children and adolescents who presented to medical attention with significant mucocutaneous bleeding. Further work is needed to develop diagnostic criteria with improved clinical validity in the pediatric setting.

Optimizing treatment of von Willebrand disease by using phenotypic and molecular data

The wide clinical spectrum of von Willebrand disease (VWD), its complex pathophysiology and its classification into distinct quantitative (type 1 or type 3) and qualitative (type 2) types with further subtle distinctions have prevented most clinicians from establishing a straightforward approach to diagnosing and treating this inherited bleeding disorder. The results of studies involving large cohorts of patients with a wide range of bleeding manifestations and variable von Willebrand factor (VWF) reduction have recently become available. These data have allowed the proposal of minimal criteria for a clinically useful diagnosis and for differentiating patients with mild VWD from subjects with borderline or only slightly reduced VWF levels who will not benefit from a specific diagnosis. These criteria are based on measurement of VWF ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo), VWF antigen (VWF:Ag), factor VIII and a standardized bleeding score (BS). Demonstration of the inheritance of the disorder could help to classify patients for whom insufficient hemostatic challenges may produce a falsely reassuring BS (like in children). Using this approach, mild VWD appears to be mostly composed of type 1 cases. Complemented by the results of desmopressin trial infusion, these parameters form the basis for a clinically oriented classification of all forms of VWD and may be useful for selecting the best treatment according to the severity of the disease. Although few molecular data have revealed practical utility, there is no doubt that the clarification of the molecular pathophysiology of VWD has allowed the unification of this complex disorder into a simple conceptual framework. This framework underlies the proposed utilization of simple phenotypic markers for optimizing treatments in individual patients.

Type 1 von Willebrand disease: application of emerging data to clinical practice

There has been much recent data published on type 1 von Willebrand disease (VWD) predominantly from three multi-centre cohort studies. These data have influenced a revision of the classification of type 1 VWD and have important implications for the management of this disorder. Patients with low von Willebrand factor (VWF) levels tend to have VWF mutations and VWD is transmitted predictably within families. In patients with VWF levels close to the lower end of the normal range, candidate mutations are found less often, ABO blood group is a more important factor and the disease has variable heritability within families. The importance of bleeding symptoms, in addition to VWF levels, in the diagnosis of type 1 VWD has been highlighted.

Detailed von Willebrand factor multimer analysis in patients with von Willebrand disease in the European study, molecular and clinical markers for the diagnosis and management of type 1 von Willebrand disease (MCMDM-1VWD)

BACKGROUND

Type 1 von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a congenital bleeding disorder characterized by a partial quantitative deficiency of plasma von Willebrand factor (VWF) in the absence of structural and/or functional VWF defects. Accurate assessment of the quantity and quality of plasma VWF is difficult but is a prerequisite for correct classification.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the proportion of misclassification of patients historically diagnosed with type 1 VWD using detailed analysis of the VWF multimer structure.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Previously diagnosed type 1 VWD families and healthy controls were recruited by 12 expert centers in nine European countries. Phenotypic characterization comprised plasma VWF parameters and multimer analysis using low- and intermediate-resolution gels combined with an optimized visualization system. VWF genotyping was performed in all index cases (ICs).

RESULTS

Abnormal multimers were present in 57 out of 150 ICs; however, only 29 out of these 57 (51%) had VWF ristocetin cofactor to antigen ratio below 0.7. In most cases multimer abnormalities were subtle, and only two cases had a significant loss of the largest multimers.

CONCLUSIONS

Of the cases previously diagnosed as type 1 VWD, 38% showed abnormal multimers. Depending on the classification criteria used, 22 out of these 57 cases (15% of the total cohort) may be reclassified as type 2, emphasizing the requirement for multimer analysis compared with a mere ratio of VWF functional parameters and VWF:Ag. This is further supported by the finding that even slightly aberrant multimers are highly predictive for the presence of VWF mutations.

Evidence-based diagnosis of type 1 von Willebrand disease: a Bayes theorem approach

The diagnosis of type 1 von Willebrand disease (VWD) is based on the presence of bleeding symptoms, reduced von Willebrand factor (VWF) levels, and autosomal inheritance of the phenotype. To better appreciate the contribution of clinical and laboratory data to the final diagnosis of VWD, we computed the likelihoods of having VWD as a function of the bleeding score (LRscore), of VWF level (LRVWF), and of number of first-degree family members with reduced VWF levels (LRfamily). The 3 likelihoods were therefore combined using the Bayes theorem, giving the final probability (odds) of having VWD. LRfamily and LRVWF were the 2 factors mostly influencing the final probability of having VWD. Data from the present study provide an evidence-based description of the minimal criteria for the diagnosis of type 1 VWD. As an example, presence of VWF levels lower than 40 IU/dL in at least 2 family members (including the proband) and a bleeding score of at least 1 were found to be required for a final odd of VWD higher than 2.0 (false-positive rate less than one-half). Validation of this approach and of its clinical utility is, however, required by analysis in other cohorts of well-characterized type 1 VWD patients.

How to estimate bleeding risk in mild bleeding disorders

The concept of mild bleeding disorders (MBD) has evolved in contrast to severe hemophilia A and B to indicate less severe disorders, characterized by the presence of more frequent and/or more prominent bleeding symptoms than in the normal population. These symptoms occur mostly after a recognizable challenge and do not lead to major discomfort or organ damage, even in the absence of specific medical intervention. However, it has become clear that, from the most severe to the mildest hemostatic disorders, there is a continuous spectrum of bleeding manifestations, which overlap with the occasional bleeding occurring in people without any identifiable hemostatic abnormality. By reviewing the principal hemorrhagic disorders we have tried to identify those entities that could fit a diagnosis of MBD and result, at the same time, in a net benefit for treatment or prophylaxis of patients rather than being simply accurate. This goal can usually be achieved by comparing the patient's phenotype with known nosological entities. However, limitations of this approach are evident, considering the paucity of clinical data and the biases of most published reports on the different disorders. In addition, in a partial deficiency of a clotting factor, a reliable relationship between the residual activity and bleeding severity is not invariably found. Molecular characterization of the defects is also generally useless. Accordingly, an accurate bleeding history in the propositus and his/her family remains of major importance. For this purpose, new standardized and possibly quantitative tools are being developed in several institutions. Innovative approaches, combining into a single probability phenotypic and genetic data, could possibly estimate better the bleeding risk in specific disorders.

Type 1 von Willebrand disease

Since its first description in 1926, the precise nature and indeed significance of von Willebrand factor (VWD) in the area of human bleeding has been unsure and often controversial. The recognition of VWD as a distinct entity in blood and the cloning of the von Willebrand factor (VWF) gene in the 1980s encouraged both phenotypic and genotypic studies, culminating in 1994 with the recognition, by the VWF subcommittee of the Scientific and Standardization Committee (SSC) of International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasy (ISTH), of three types of VWD, characterized by severe plasma VWF deficiency (type 3), functionally deficient plasma VWF (type 2) and reduced (below normal) levels of plasma VWF, which is functionally essentially normal (type 1; 70% of all cases). Since then, whereas gene analysis has recognized VWF gene (VWF) mutations in most individuals with type 3 and type 2 disease, the latter mutations correlating well with recognized functional domains within the VWF protein, few mutations have been reported in cases with type 1 VWD. This led to speculation that other factors, particularly ABO blood group, may be primarily responsible for the majority of such patients, perhaps combined with a generic bleeding tendency throughout the normal population. Recent large studies in Europe and Canada have considerably clarified this situation, revealing that the majority of type 1 VWD is associated with mutations within VWF. The role of these mutations in the aetiology of the disease opens up new approaches to the study of the diagnosis and treatment of the condition. Conversely, the lack of a change in the VWF gene in many recruited families will lead to enhanced efforts to identify non-VWF gene causes both at the genetic and epigenetic level.