Clinical guidelines and off-license recombinant activated factor VII: content, use, and association with patient outcomes

The Australian and New Zealand Haemostasis Registry: ten years of data on off-licence use of recombinant activated factor VII

BACKGROUND

Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) has been widely used as an off-licence pan-haemostatic agent in patients with critical bleeding. However, outside the trauma setting, there is relatively little high quality evidence on the risks and benefits of this agent. The Haemostasis Registry was established to investigate the extent of use, dosing, safety and outcomes of patients after off-licence rFVIIa treatment of critical bleeding.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Registry recruited non-haemophiliac patients treated with rFVIIa from 2000-2009 (inclusive) in Australia and New Zealand. Detailed information was gathered on patients' demographics, context of bleeding, rFVIIa administration, laboratory results, blood component and other therapies, and outcomes. Outcome measures included subjectively assessed effect of rFVIIa on bleeding (response), adverse events (thromboembolic and other) and 28-day mortality.

RESULTS

The registry included 3,446 cases in 3,322 patients (median [IQR] age 56 [33-70] years, 65% (n=2,147) male). Clinical indications included cardiac surgery (45%), other surgery (18%), trauma (13%), medical bleeding (6%), liver disease (6%), and obstetric haemorrhage (5%). The median [IQR] dose was 91 [72-103] μg/kg and 77% received a single dose. Reduction or cessation of bleeding was reported in 74% and 28-day survival was 71% but outcomes varied depending on clinical context. pH strongly correlated with outcome measures; 81% of patients with pH <7.1 died. Approximately 11% of patients had thromboembolic adverse events. In multivariate analysis, pH prior to administration and bleeding context were independently associated with reported response to rFVIIa and 28-day mortality.

DISCUSSION

The Haemostasis Registry is the largest dataset of its kind and provides observational data on the off-licence use of rFVIIa over a 10-year period. It has been an invaluable resource for rigorously tracking adverse events and helping to inform clinical practice.

Recombinant activated factor VII use in critically ill patients: clinical outcomes and thromboembolic events

BACKGROUND

Hemorrhage and coagulopathy are associated with morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) is frequently used in these situations to control bleeding; however, few controlled clinical trials have demonstrated clinical benefit and prolonged survival.

OBJECTIVE

To compare clinical outcomes and thromboembolic events in intensive care unit (ICU) patients who received rFVIIa versus ICU patients who did not between 2000 and 2005.

METHODS

A total of 2918 nonhemophiliac adult ICU patients, which included 1459 who received at least 1 dose of rFVIIa and 1459 matched controls who did not, were included in a retrospective database study. Data were extracted from the Solucient ACTracker database, which included 550 hospitals across the US. Measures included patient demographics, rFVIIa prescribing, death, thromboembolic events, discharge disposition, length of stay, and transfusion data.

RESULTS

The most common primary diagnoses for patients receiving rFVIIa included traumatic brain injury, cirrhosis, and nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage. Patients receiving rFVIIa were more likely to have comorbidities, including mechanical ventilation, acute kidney injury, sepsis, hemodialysis, and gastrointestinal bleeding (p < 0.0001). The average rFVIIa dose was 4.8 mg and 82% of patients received 1 dose. Compared to controls, patients receiving rFVIIa had greater odds of death (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.8-2.6, p < 0.0001), transfusion (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.8-2.5, p < 0.0001), and longer length of stay (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in thromboembolic events between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

While we cannot show direct causality between rFVIIa and the poor clinical outcomes documented in ICU patients, they provide important insight for critical care clinicians.