The risk of cancer in patients with venous thromboembolism does not exceed that expected in the general population after the first 6 months

Thrombosis and cachexia in cancer: two partners in crime?

Among cancer patients, thrombosis and cachexia are major causes of morbidity and mortality. Although the two may occur together, little is known about their possible relationship. Thus, a literature review was conducted by screening the databases PubMed, Scopus, SciELO, Medline and Web of Science. To summarize, cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) and cancer-associated cachexia (CAC) seem to share several patient-, tumour- and treatment-related risk factors. Inflammation alongside metabolic and endocrine derangement is the potential missing link between CAT, CAC and cancer. Many key players, including specific pro-inflammatory cytokines, immune cells and hormones, appear to be implicated in both thrombosis and cachexia, representing attractive predictive markers and potential therapeutic targets. Altogether, the current evidence suggests a link between CAT and CAC, however, epidemiological studies are required to explore this potential relationship. Given the high incidence and negative impact of both diseases, further studies are needed for the better management of cancer patients.

Screening for Occult Cancer in Patients with Venous Thromboembolism

Unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) can be the first sign of an occult cancer. The rate of occult cancer detection within 12 months of a newly diagnosed unprovoked VTE is approximately 5%. Therefore, it is appealing for clinicians to screen patients with unprovoked VTE for occult cancer, as it could potentially decrease cancer-related mortality and morbidity and improve quality of life. However, several randomized controlled trials have failed to report that an extensive occult cancer screening strategy (e.g., computed tomography of the abdomen/pelvis) is improving these patient-important outcomes. Therefore, clinical guidance documents suggest that patients should only undergo a limited screening strategy including a thorough medical history, physical examination, basic laboratory investigations (i.e., complete blood count and liver function tests), chest X-ray, as well as age- and gender-specific cancer screening (breast, cervical, colon and prostate). More intensive occult cancer screening including additional investigations is not routinely recommended. This narrative review will focus on the epidemiology, timing, and evidence regarding occult cancer detection in patients with unprovoked VTE.

Risk of cancer after anticoagulation in patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism: an observational cohort study

Essentials Data on long-term cancer risk are controversial in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). We assessed long-term rates and risk factors of cancer in patients with VTE. Cancer risk after anticoagulation is not higher in VTE patients than in the general population. VTE recurrence is not predictive of a future cancer diagnosis.

SUMMARY

Background Patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) are at risk of having a subsequent cancer diagnosis. The risk is highest during the first 6 months. Reports on cancer rates thereafter are controversial. We aimed to assess long-term rates and risk factors of cancer in patients with VTE. Methods and Results We followed patients with a first unprovoked VTE after discontinuation of anticoagulation, and excluded those receiving long-term antithrombotic therapy or with major thrombophilia. The study endpoint was the occurrence of cancer. Sixty-two (5.2%) of 1188 patients developed cancer during a median follow-up of 98 months. The cumulative incidence rates of cancer were 0.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.2-1.2%), 3.1% (95% CI 2.0-4.1%) and 9% (95% CI 6.5-11.5) after 1, 5 and 15 years; these were not significantly different from those in the matched general population (0.6%, 3.4%, and 12.2%, respectively). The corresponding standardized incidence ratios (ratio of the observed cancer cases and the number of cases based on national cancer incidence rates) of 1.1 (95% CI 0.5-2.5), 1.0 (95% CI 0.6-1.4) and 0.9 (95% CI 0.7-1.2) did not indicate a difference in cancer incidence between our cohort and the general population. Advancing age (hazard ratio [HR] per decade 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-2.0) and shorter duration of anticoagulation (HR per 1-month decrease 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.6) were associated with an increased cancer risk, whereas VTE recurrence was not (HR 1.17, 95% CI 0.66-2.07). Conclusions Asymptomatic patients with unprovoked VTE who have completed anticoagulation therapy do not have a higher cancer risk. The inverse association between the duration of anticoagulation and the incidence of cancer warrants further investigation.

ANMCO Position Paper: long-term follow-up of patients with pulmonary thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis, is the third most common cause of cardiovascular death. The management of the acute phase of VTE has already been described in several guidelines. However, the management of the follow-up (FU) of these patients has been poorly defined. This consensus document, created by the Italian cardiologists, wants to clarify this issue using the currently available evidence in VTE. Clinical and instrumental data acquired during the acute phase of the disease are the cornerstone for planning the FU. Acquired or congenital thrombophilic disorders could be identified in apparently unprovoked VTE during the FU. In other cases, an occult cancer could be discovered after a VTE. The main targets of the post-acute management are to prevent recurrence of VTE and to identify the patients who can develop a chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Knowledge of pathophysiology and therapeutic approaches is fundamental to decide the most appropriate long-term treatment. Moreover, prognostic stratification during the FU should be constantly updated on the basis of the new evidence acquired. Currently, the cornerstone of VTE treatment is represented by both the oral and the parenteral anticoagulation. Novel oral anticoagulants should be an interesting alternative in the long-term treatment.

Apatinib to combat EGFR-TKI resistance in an advanced non-small cell lung cancer patient with unknown EGFR status: a case report

Lung adenocarcinoma is the most common pathological pattern of lung cancer. During the past decades, a number of targeted agents have been explored to treat advanced lung adenocarcinoma. In the present clinical practice, antagonists of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-directed therapies are widely used. In the former category, the agent erlotinib (tyrosine kinase inhibitor) has shown obvious advantages over cytotoxic therapy. Anti-VEGF therapy bevacizumab used for lung adenocarcinoma was recommended in NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) as first-line therapy. Similarly, apatinib is speculated to response by selectively inhibiting the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2. The patient with unknown EGFR status benefited 5-month progressive free survival (PFS) from erlotinib, and then another 5.1-month PFS with combined treatment of apatinib, which suggested a new option for lung adenocarcinoma. However, when dabigatran was used to cancer-related venous thromboembolism during apatinib therapy, extensive subcutaneous bleeding occurred, warning us against the risks of bleeding. Besides, hypertension and anorexia were observed, causing dosage adjustment.

Guidance for the prevention and treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a highly prevalent complication of malignancy with emerging changes in incidence, diagnosis and treatment paradigms. This manuscript, initiated by the Anticoagulation Forum, provides clinical guidance based on existing guidelines and consensus expert opinion where guidelines are lacking. We address a) the appropriate workup to search for occult malignancy in patients with idiopathic VTE, b) identification of high-risk cancer patients for primary thromboprophylaxis, c) the appropriate immediate and long-term treatment for people with cancer diagnosed with acute thromboembolism, d) the appropriate duration of anticoagulation and e) the appropriate treatment strategy in patients with recurrent VTE on anticoagulation. Areas of controversy and future directions in this field are highlighted.

Frequency of malignancy is high in patients admitted for a first venous thromboembolism episode: an observational study

Patients with a cancer at time of first venous thromboembolism (VTE) have not been thoroughly analyzed. Our study aimed to (1) determine the frequency of cancer diagnosed in patients hospitalized for a first VTE episode, (2) investigate the characteristics of VTE and cancer in such patients. All consecutive adults patients hospitalized over a 6-years period for a first VTE episode in a tertiary care hospital were considered. Patients with congenital or acquired thrombophilia were excluded. Demographic, medical history, and follow up data were retrieved from medical records. 216 patients (63.6 ± 19.7 years, 63.4 % females) hospitalized for a first VTE were analyzed. Among them, 64 patients (29.6 %) had cancer, either revealed (n = 26) or already known (n = 38) at VTE diagnosis. Cancer was in an advanced stage in 26 patients (40.6 %). Patients with cancer were older and displayed a higher frequency of vena cava thrombosis, as compared to patients without cancer. VTE was more recurrent and mortality was higher in patients with cancer. Cancer occurred after VTE diagnosis in only 2 (2/127, 1.6 %) cases during a protracted follow-up of 24.1 ± 22.5 months. Overall, VTE preceded cancer diagnosis in only 3 % (2/66) of cases. Frequency of cancer is high among patients hospitalized for a first VTE. In such setting, VTE often involved unusual sites such as vena cava. In most cases, cancer was either already known or diagnosed at time of VTE, with a poor prognosis.

Risk factors predictive of occult cancer detection in patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism

Risk factors predictive of occult cancer detection in patients with a first unprovoked symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) are unknown. Cox proportional hazard models and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the effect of specific risk factors on occult cancer detection within 1 year of a diagnosis of unprovoked VTE in patients randomized in the Screening for Occult Malignancy in Patients with Idiopathic Venous Thromboembolism (SOME) trial. A total of 33 (3.9%; 95% CI, 2.8%-5.4%) out of the 854 included patients received a new diagnosis of cancer at 1-year follow-up. Age ≥ 60 years (hazard ratio [HR], 3.11; 95% CI, 1.41-6.89; ITALIC! P= .005), previous provoked VTE (HR, 3.20; 95% CI, 1.19-8.62; ITALIC! P= .022), and current smoker status (HR, 2.80; 95% CI, 1.24-6.33; ITALIC! P= .014) were associated with occult cancer detection. Age, prior provoked VTE, and smoking status may be important predictors of occult cancer detection in patients with first unprovoked VTE. This trial was registered atwww.clinicaltrials.govas #NCT00773448.