Prothrombin complex concentrates reduce blood loss in murine coagulopathy induced by warfarin, but not in that induced by dabigatran etexilate

Correction of haemorrhagic shock-associated coagulopathy and impaired haemostasis by plasma, prothrombin complex concentrates or an activated protein C-targeted DNA aptamer in mice

Even with extensive transfusion support, trauma-induced bleeding often leads to death. Early intervention may improve outcomes, yet which blood products, factor concentrates, or other drugs constitute optimal treatment is unclear. Patients with acute traumatic coagulopathy (ATC), arising from trauma and haemorrhagic shock, have the worst prognosis. Here, multiple interventions were compared in a mouse model of ATC. After the trauma of tissue excision, anaesthetized mice were bled to 35 mm Hg mean arterial pressure, maintained under shock for 60 min, and resuscitated with fluids equal in volume to the shed blood. Resuscitated mice were subjected to liver laceration to test haemostasis and blood loss was quantified. Saline-treated mice lost two- to three-fold more blood than sham-treated animals and were coagulopathic by prothrombin time elevation post- versus pre-procedure. Murine fresh-frozen plasma (mFFP), anti-activated protein C aptamer HS02-52G, or prothrombin complex concentrates eliminated the bleeding diathesis and coagulopathy; fibrinogen, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, or tranexamic acid ameliorated bleeding or coagulopathy, but not both. HS02-52G and mFFP also eliminated the changes in plasma aPC and tissue plasminogen activator levels observed in saline-treated mice, as judged via microtiter plate biomarker assays. Procoagulant interventions, especially inhibiting aPC, could be beneficial in human ATC.

Direct Oral Anticoagulant Reversal in the Pediatric Emergency Department

ABSTRACT

Direct oral anticoagulants have been used in the adult population for years and are being used more frequently in pediatrics. Direct oral anticoagulants are chosen preferentially because they do not require close outpatient monitoring, have an equal or better safety profile, and are easy for patients to take. Warfarin is the previous, more commonly used oral anticoagulant and acts as a vitamin K antagonist. Direct oral anticoagulants mechanism of action is different in that they directly inhibit part of the coagulation cascade accomplishing the same end goal. Given their differing mechanisms, they require alternate medications for proper reversal when concerned about overdose of life-threatening bleeds. This review will outline the most commonly used direct oral anticoagulants in pediatric populations and the supporting (mainly adult) data available for proper reversal of these medications in times of need.

A Historical Perspective on the Reversal of Anticoagulants

There has been a landmark shift in the last several decades in the management and prevention of thromboembolic events. From the discovery of parenteral and oral agents requiring frequent monitoring as early as 1914, to the development of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) that do not require monitoring or dose adjustment in the late 20th century, great advances have been achieved. Despite the advent of these newer agents, bleeding continues to be a key complication, affecting 2 to 4% of DOAC-treated patients per year. Bleeding is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Although specific reversal agents for DOACs have lagged the release of these agents, idarucizumab and andexanet alfa are now available as antagonists. However, the efficacy of these reversal agents is uncertain, and complications, including thrombosis, have not been adequately explored. As such, guidelines continue to advise the use of nonspecific prohemostatic agents for patients requiring reversal of the anticoagulant effect of these drugs. As the indications for DOACs and the overall prevalence of their use expand, there is an unmet need for further studies to determine the efficacy of specific compared with nonspecific pro-hemostatic reversal agents. In this review, we will discuss the evidence behind specific and nonspecific reversal agents for both parenteral and oral anticoagulants.

Direct oral anticoagulants: a review on the current role and scope of reversal agents

New guideline recommendations prefer direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over warfarin in DOAC-eligible patients with atrial fibrillation and patients with venous thromboembolism. As expected with all antithrombotic agents, there is an associated increased risk of bleeding complications in patients receiving DOACs that can be attributed to the DOAC itself, or other issues such as acute trauma, invasive procedures, or underlying comorbidities. For the majority of severe bleeding events, the widespread approach is to withdraw the DOAC, then provide supportive measures and "watchful waiting" with the expectation that the bleeding event will resolve with time. However, urgent reversal of anticoagulation may be advantageous in patients with serious or life-threatening bleeding or in those requiring urgent surgery or procedures. Until recently, the lack of specific reversal agents, has affected the uptake of these agents in clinical practice despite a safer profile compared to warfarin in clinical trials. In cases of life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding or when patients require emergency surgery or urgent procedures, idarucizumab has been recently approved for reversal of anticoagulation in dabigatran-treated patients and andexanet alfa for factor Xa inhibitor-treated treated patients. The current review summarizes the current clinical evidence and scope of these agents with the potential impact on DOAC use in clinical practice.

Reversal strategies and outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and warfarin-associated intracranial hemorrhage

PURPOSE

Evaluate reversal strategies in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with warfarin-associated intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in clinical care.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Observational cohort of AF patients with warfarin-associated ICH at two referral hospitals (2007-2010), with patient features, reversal agents, and outcomes collected from medical records.

RESULTS

Among 498 ICH patients 403 received fresh frozen plasma (FFP) without 3-factor prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) or recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa), 65 received PCCs or rFVIIa, mostly with FFP, and 30 received no acute reversal agents. Median time from presentation to reversal agent administration was 3.4 h (IQR 2.3-5.3). INR was reversed to ≤1.4 by 6 h post-presentation in 46% of patients receiving PCCs/rFVIIa versus 15% receiving FFP alone (p<0.0001). Among PCCs/rFVIIa recipients, 31% died in-hospital vs. 24% receiving FFP alone (p=0.27). Adjusted OR for death accounting for age and Glasgow Coma Score was 0.78 (0.36-1.69) for PCCs/rFVIIa vs FFP only and 1.16 (0.59-2.27) comparing those reaching vs. not reaching INR ≤ 1.4 at 6 h.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with PCCs/rFVIIa led to faster INR reversal than treatment with FFP alone. Neither treatment with PCCs/rFVIIa nor rapid INR reversal was associated with improved survival. Delays receiving PCCs may largely eliminate the benefit of treatment.

Activated prothrombin complex concentrates for direct oral anticoagulant-associated bleeding or urgent surgery: Hemostatic and thrombotic outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Studies evaluating the use of activated prothrombin complex concentrates (aPCCs) for DOAC-associated bleeding are sparse.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of patients receiving aPCC for DOAC-associated bleeding or for pre-operative optimization of hemostasis prior to urgent surgery. The primary efficacy outcome was hemostatic efficacy, the primary safety outcome was the 30-day thromboembolic complication rate.

RESULTS

Eighty-two patients were included in the analysis; 14 patients on dabigatran, 39 patients on rivaroxaban and 29 patients on apixaban. Fifty-four patients received aPCC for major bleeding and 28 patients prior to urgent surgery. Mean aPCC dosing was 2974 IU (SD ± 857 IU). Hemostasis was deemed effective by ISTH criteria in 50% of cases and "Good" or "Moderate" by Sarode criteria in 45.2% and 14.3% of cases, respectively. Surgical hemostasis was rated as "Normal" in 84% of cases pre-operative administration. Median pre-aPCC INR was 1.6 (IQR 0.5) and median post-aPCC INR was 1.2 (IQR 0.2) (p < 0.00001). Median pre-aPCC aPTT was 36 s (IQR 12.8), median post-aPCC aPTT was 29 s (IQR 9.8) (p = 0.0001). The 30-day thromboembolic event rate was 6.1%.

CONCLUSION

Further study is needed to characterize the hemostatic effects and thromboembolic risk of aPCC among patients with DOAC-associated bleeding or for attempted normalization of hemostasis prior to urgent surgery.

Mechanisms of vascular permeability and remodeling associated with hemarthrosis in factor VIII-deficient mice

BACKGROUND

Vascular remodeling associated with hemophilic arthropathy (HA) may contribute to bleed propagation, but the mechanisms remain poorly understood.

OBJECTIVES

To explore molecular mechanisms of HA and the effects of hemostasis correction on synovial vascular remodeling after joint injury in hypocoagulable mice.

METHODS

Factor VIII (FVIII)-deficient mice +/- FVIII treatment and hypocoagulable wild-type mice (Hypo BALB/c) were subjected to subpatellar puncture. Hypo BALB/c mice were treated with warfarin and anti-FVIII before injury, after which warfarin was continued for 2 weeks or reversed +/- continuous anti-FVIII until harvest. Synovial vascularity was analyzed at baseline and 2 to 4 weeks post injury by histology, musculoskeletal ultrasound with power Doppler (microvascular flow), and Evans blue extravasation (vascular permeability). Synovial gene expression and systemic markers of vascular collagen turnover were studied in FVIII-deficient mice by RNA sequencing and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

Vascular changes occurred in FVIII-deficient and Hypo BALB/c mice after injury with minimal effect of hemostasis correction. Increased vascular permeability was only significant in FVIII-deficient mice, who exhibited more pronounced vascular remodeling than Hypo BALB/c mice despite similar bleed volumes. FVIII-deficient mice exhibited a strong transcriptional response in synovium that was only partially affected by FVIII treatment and involved genes relating to angiogenesis and extracellular matrix remodeling, with vascular collagen turnover markers detected systemically.

CONCLUSIONS

Intact hemostasis at the time of hemarthrosis and during healing are both critical to prevent vascular remodeling, which appears worse with severe and prolonged FVIII deficiency. Unbiased RNA sequencing revealed potential targets for intervention and biomarker development to improve management of HA.

Prothrombin, alone or in complex concentrates or plasma, reduces bleeding in a mouse model of blood exchange-induced coagulopathy

Prothrombin complex concentrates (PCC) are fractionated plasma protein drugs that reverse warfarin anticoagulation. PCC may control more general bleeding. We sought to identify the dominant procoagulant factor in PCC in vivo. We tested PCC or coagulation factor (F) treatment in CD1 mice made coagulopathic by exchange of whole blood for washed red cells. Anesthetized mice were transfused with murine fresh-frozen plasma (mFFP), PCC, mixtures of human vitamin K-dependent proteins (VKDP) (prothrombin, FVII, FIX, or FX), or purified single human VKDP, immediately prior to tail transection (TT), liver laceration (LL), or intravascular laser injury (ILI). Plasma donor mice were treated with vehicle or control antisense oligonucleotide (ASO-CON) or ASO specific for prothrombin (FII) (ASO-FII) to yield mFFP or ASO-CON mFFP or ASO-FII mFFP. Blood losses were determined spectrophotometrically (TT) or gravimetrically (LL). Thrombus formation was quantified by intravital microscopy of laser-injured arterioles. PCC or four factor- (4F-) VKDP or prothrombin significantly reduced bleeding from TT or LL. Omission of prothrombin from 4F-VKDP significantly reduced its ability to limit bleeding. Mice transfused with ASO-FII mFFP demonstrated inferior haemostasis versus those transfused with ASO-FII following TT, LL, or ILI. Prothrombin is the dominant procoagulant component of PCC and could limit bleeding in trauma.

Intracerebral Hemorrhage

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article describes the advances in the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in adults.

RECENT FINDINGS

Therapeutic intervention in intracerebral hemorrhage has continued to focus on arresting hemorrhage expansion, with large randomized controlled trials addressing the effectiveness of rapidly lowering blood pressure, hemostatic therapy with platelet transfusion, and other clotting complexes and clot volume reduction both of intraventricular and parenchymal hematomas using minimally invasive techniques. Smaller studies targeting perihematomal edema and inflammation may also show promise.

SUMMARY

The management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage, long relegated to the management and prevention of complications, is undergoing a recent evolution in large part owing to stereotactically guided clot evacuation techniques that have been shown to be safe and that may potentially improve outcomes.

Idarucizumab, but not procoagulant concentrates, fully restores dabigatran-altered platelet and fibrin components of hemostasis

BACKGROUND

Comparative studies on the restoration of hemostasis with different reversal agents after dabigatran therapy have not been performed. We compared the efficacy and prothrombotic potential of the specific antidote idarucizumab with that of previously recommended non-specific procoagulant concentrates.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We explored the in vitro effects of dabigatran (184 ng/mL) on fibrin and platelet-aggregate formation onto a damaged vessel under flow conditions (600 s^-1 ). The reversal mechanisms and efficacy of idarucizumab (0.3-3 mg/mL) were compared with that of the non-specific procoagulant concentrates aPCC (25-75 U/Kg), PCC (70 U/Kg), or rFVIIa (120 μg/Kg). Generation of thrombin and prothrombin fragment (F1 + 2), and thromboelastometry parameters of clot formation were measured.

RESULTS

Dabigatran caused pronounced reductions in fibrin (87%) and platelet interactions (36%) with damaged vessels (p < 0.01) and significantly impaired thrombin generation and thromboelastometric parameters (delayed dynamics and reduced firmness). Idarucizumab completely normalized rates of fibrin and platelet coverage to baseline values in flow studies; and reversed the alterations in thrombin generation, F1 + 2 and thromboelastometry parameters produced by dabigatran. In comparison, aPCC and PCC only partially compensated for the dabigatran-induced alterations in fibrin deposition, but were unable to fully restore them to baseline values. Reversal with aPCC or PCC improved the majority of alterations in coagulation-related tests, but tended to overcompensate thrombin generation kinetics and significantly increased F1 + 2 levels.

CONCLUSION

Idarucizumab antagonizes alterations of direct and indirect biomarkers of hemostasis caused by dabigatran. In our studies, idarucizumab was clearly more efficacious than strategies with non-specific procoagulant concentrates and devoid of the excessive procoagulant tendency observed with the latter.

Pharmacological reversal of the direct oral anticoagulants-A comprehensive review of the literature

The direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are used for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (SPAF) and the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolic disease (VTE). Although DOAC-associated bleeding events are less frequent as compared to vitamin K antagonists, there is significant concern surrounding physicians' ability to evaluate and manage DOAC-associated bleeding when it does occur. Idarucizumab is a specific reversal agent for dabigatran and is the agent of choice for dabigatran reversal in the setting of major bleeding or urgent surgery/procedures. There are no commercially available specific reversal agents for the direct Xa inhibitors. Although they have not been rigorously studied in DOAC-treated patients requiring urgent anticoagulant reversal, limited evidence from in vitro studies, animal bleeding models, human volunteer studies (in vivo and in vitro) and case series suggest that coagulation factor replacement with prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) and activated PCC (FEIBA) may contribute to hemostasis. However, the safety and efficacy of these agents and the optimal dosing strategies remain uncertain.

Update on the Treatment of Spontaneous Intraparenchymal Hemorrhage: Medical and Interventional Management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Spontaneous intraparenchymal hemorrhage (IPH) is a prominent challenge faced globally by neurosurgeons, neurologists, and intensivists. Over the past few decades, basic and clinical research efforts have been undertaken with the goal of delineating biologically and evidence-based practices aimed at decreasing mortality and optimizing the likelihood of meaningful functional outcome for patients afflicted with this devastating condition. Here, the authors review the medical and surgical approaches available for the treatment of spontaneous intraparenchymal hemorrhage, identifying areas of recent progress and ongoing research to delineate the scope and scale of IPH as it is currently understood and treated.

RECENT FINDINGS

The approaches to IPH have broadly focused on arresting expansion of hemorrhage using a number of approaches. Recent trials have addressed the effectiveness of rapid blood pressure lowering in hypertensive patients with IPH, with rapid lowering demonstrated to be safe and at least partially effective in preventing hematoma expansion. Hemostatic therapy with platelet transfusion in patients on anti-platelet medications has been recently demonstrated to have no benefit and may be harmful. Hemostasis with administration of clotting complexes has not been shown to be effective in reducing hematoma expansion or improving outcomes although correcting these abnormalities as soon as possible remains good practice until further data are available. Stereotactically guided drainage of IPH with intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) has been shown to be safe and to improve outcomes. Research on new stereotactic surgical methods has begun to show promise. Patients with IPH should have rapid and accurate diagnosis with neuroimaging with computed tomography (CT) and computed tomography angiography (CTA). Early interventions should include control of hypertension to a systolic BP in the range of 140 mmHg for small hemorrhages without intracranial hypertension with beta blockers or calcium channel blockers, correction of any coagulopathy if present, and assessment of the need for surgical intervention. IPH and FUNC (Functional Outcome in Patients with Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage) scores should be assessed. Patients should be dispositioned to a dedicated neurologic ICU if available. Patients should be monitored for seizures and intracranial pressure issues. Select patients, particularly those with intraventricular extension, may benefit from evacuation of hematoma with a ventriculostomy or stereotactically guided catheter. Once stabilized, patients should be reassessed with CT imaging and receive ongoing management of blood pressure, cerebral edema, ICP issues, and seizures as they arise. The goal of care for most patients is to regain capacity to receive multidisciplinary rehabilitation to optimize functional outcome.

Emergency care of patients receiving non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), which inhibit thrombin (dabigatran) and factor Xa (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban) have been introduced in several clinical indications. Although NOACs have a favourable benefit-risk profile and can be used without routine laboratory monitoring, they are associated-as any anticoagulant-with a risk of bleeding. In addition, treatment may need to be interrupted in patients who need surgery or other procedures. The objective of this article, developed by a multidisciplinary panel of experts in thrombosis and haemostasis, is to provide an update on the management of NOAC-treated patients who experience a bleeding episode or require an urgent procedure. Recent advances in the development of targeted reversal agents are expected to help streamline the management of NOAC-treated patients in whom rapid reversal of anticoagulation is required.

Therapy with activated prothrombin complex concentrate is effective in reducing dabigatran-associated blood loss in a porcine polytrauma model

Clinical use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants is increasingly well established. However, specific agents for reversal of these drugs are not currently available. It was to objective of this study to investigate the impact of activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) on the anticoagulant effects of dabigatran in a randomised, controlled, porcine trauma model. Twenty-one pigs received oral and intravenous dabigatran, resulting in supratherapeutic plasma concentrations. Twelve minutes after injury (standardised bilateral femur fractures and blunt liver injury), animals (n=7/group) received 25 or 50 U/kg aPCC (aPCC25 and aPCC50) or placebo (control) and were followed for 5 hours. The primary endpoint was total volume of blood loss (BL). Haemodynamic and coagulation variables (prothrombin time [PT], activated partial thromboplastin time, diluted thrombin time, thrombin–antithrombin complexes, thromboelastometry, thrombin generation and D-dimers) were measured. Twelve minutes post-injury, BL was similar between groups. Compared with control (total BL: 3807 ± 570 ml) and aPCC25 (3690 ± 454 ml; p=0.77 vs control), a significant reduction in total BL (1639 ± 276 ml; p< 0.0001) and improved survival (p< 0.05) was observed with aPCC50. Dabigatran’s anticoagulant effects were effectively treated in the aPCC50 group, as measured by several parameters including EXTEM clotting time (CT) and PT. In contrast, with aPCC25, laboratory values were initially corrected but subsequently deteriorated due to ongoing blood loss. Thromboembolic or bleeding effects were not detected. In conclusion, blood loss following trauma in dabigatran-anticoagulated pigs was successfully reduced by 50 U/kg aPCC. Optimal methodology for measuring amelioration of dabigatran anticoagulation by aPCC is yet to be determined.

Reversal of dabigatran anticoagulation ex vivo: Porcine study comparing prothrombin complex concentrates and idarucizumab

Urgent surgery or life-threatening bleeding requires prompt reversal of the anticoagulant effects of dabigatran. This study assessed the ability of three- and four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) and idarucizumab (specific antidote for dabigatran) to reverse the anticoagulant effects of dabigatran in a porcine model of trauma. Twelve animals were given dabigatran etexilate (DE) orally and dabigatran intravenously, before infliction of trauma. Six animals received tranexamic acid plus fibrinogen concentrate 12 minutes post-injury. Six PCCs (each 30 and 60 U/kg) and idarucizumab (30 and 60 mg/kg) were added to blood samples ex vivo. Coagulation was assessed by several coagulation assays. All coagulation parameters were altered after dabigatran infusion (plasma level: 442 ± 138 ng/ml). Both threeand four-factor PCCs mostly or completely reversed the effects of dabigatran on thromboelastometry variables and PT but not on aPTT. Idarucizumab neutralised plasma concentrations of dabigatran, and reversed the effects of the drug on coagulation variables. Thrombin generation showed dose-dependent over-correction following the addition of PCC, implying that elevated levels of thrombin are required to overcome dabigatran-induced coagulopathy. In contrast, treatment with idarucizumab returned thrombin generation to baseline levels. Following trauma, therapy with tranexamic acid plus fibrinogen improved correction of coagulation parameters by PCC, and thromboelastometry parameters by idarucizumab. All investigated PCCs improved dabigatran- and trauma-induced coagulopathy to a similar degree. In conclusion, this study shows that three- and four-factor PCCs are similarly effective for dabigatran reversal. Idarucizumab also reversed the effects of dabigatran and, unlike PCCs, was not associated with over-correction of thrombin generation.

Note: This study was performed at the RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelsstrasse 30, D-52074 Aachen, Germany.

Direct oral anticoagulant reversal: how, when and issues faced

INTRODUCTION

The number of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients requiring thrombo-prophylaxis with oral anticoagulation is greatly increasing. The introduction of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in addition to standard therapy with dose-adjusted warfarin has increased the therapeutic options for AF patients. Despite a generally better safety profile of the NOACs, the risk of major bleedings still persists, and the management of serious bleeding is a clinical challenge. Areas covered: In the current review, risk of major bleeding in patients taking NOACs and general approaches to manage bleeding depending on severity, with a particular focus on specific reversal agents, are discussed. Expert commentary: Due to short half-life of NOACs compared to warfarin, discontinuation of drug, mechanical compression, and volume substitution are considered to be sufficient measures in most of bleeding cases. In case of life-threatening bleeding or urgent surgery, hemostasis can be achieved with non-specific reversal agents (prothrombin complex concentrates) in patients treated with factor Xa inhibitor until specific antidotes (andexanet α and ciraparantag) will receive approval. Thus far, idarucizumab has been the only reversal agent approved for dabigatran.

The Reversal of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Animal Models

Several direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), including direct thrombin and factor Xa inhibitors, have been approved as alternatives to vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants. As with any anticoagulant, DOAC use carries a risk of bleeding. In patients with major bleeding or needing urgent surgery, reversal of DOAC anticoagulation may be required, presenting a clinical challenge. The optimal strategy for DOAC reversal is being refined, and may include use of hemostatic agents such as prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs; a source of concentrated clotting factors), or DOAC-specific antidotes (which bind their target DOAC to abrogate its activity). Though promising, most specific antidotes are still in development.Preclinical animal research is the key to establishing the efficacy and safety of potential reversal agents. Here, we summarize published preclinical animal studies on reversal of DOAC anticoagulation. These studies (n = 26) were identified via a PubMed search, and used rodent, rabbit, pig, and non-human primate models. The larger of these animals have the advantages of similar blood volume/hemodynamics to humans, and can be used to model polytrauma. We find that in addition to varied species being used, there is variability in the models and assays used between studies; we suggest that blood loss (bleeding volume) is the most clinically relevant measure of DOAC anticoagulation-related bleeding and its reversal.The studies covered indicate that both PCCs and specific reversal agents have the potential to be used as part of a clinical strategy for DOAC reversal. For the future, we advocate the development and use of standardized, clinically, and pharmacologically relevant animal models to study novel DOAC reversal strategies.

Management of Bleeding With Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in the Era of Specific Reversal Agents

Vitamin K antagonists are commonly used by clinicians to provide anticoagulation to patients who have or are at risk of having thrombotic events. In addition to familiarity with the dosing and monitoring of vitamin K antagonists, clinicians are accustomed to using vitamin K if there is a need to reverse the anticoagulant effect of vitamin K antagonists. There are now 4 new non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) that are attractive alternatives to vitamin K antagonists. Despite similar or lower rates of serious bleeding with NOACs in comparison with warfarin, there is a pressing need for strategies to manage bleeding when it does occur with NOACs and to reverse the pharmacological effect of these agents if needed. Important steps in minimizing bleeding risks with NOACs include dose adjustment of the agents in the setting of renal dysfunction and avoidance of the concomitant use of other antithrombotic agents if feasible. Laboratory measurement of the anticoagulant effect of NOACs is best accomplished with specialized assays, although some of the more widely available coagulation tests can provide information that is potentially useful to clinicians. Nonspecific hemostatic agents such as prothrombin complex concentrates and recombinant factor VIIa can be used to reverse the effect of NOACs. More specific reversing agents include the approved humanized monoclonal antibody fragment idarucizumab for reversing the effects of dabigatran, the investigational factor Xa decoy andexanet alfa, and the synthetic small molecule ciraparantag. Both andexanet and ciraparantag have been reported to reverse the effects of the anti-Xa NOACs (rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban), and a number of other anticoagulant agents in common clinical use, as well.

Management of bleeding in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants

BACKGROUND

Recently, a new generation of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) with a greater specificity towards activated coagulation factors was introduced based on encouraging results for efficacy and safety in clinical studies. An initial limitation of these new drugs was the absence of an adequate strategy to reverse the effect if a bleeding event occurs or an urgent invasive procedure has to be carried out.

MAIN TEXT

Specific reversing agents for DOACs have become available, however, and are now evaluated in clinical studies. For the anti-factor Xa agents (rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban) a number of studies have shown that the administration of prothrombin complex concentrate resulted in a correction of the prolonged prothrombin time and restored depressed thrombin generation after rivaroxaban treatment in a controlled trial in healthy human subjects. In view of the relatively wide availability of prothrombin complex concentrates, this would be an interesting option if the results can be confirmed in patients on oral factor Xa inhibitors who present with bleeding complications. More specific reversal can be achieved with andexanet, a new agent currently in development that competitively binds to the anti-factor Xa agents. For the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran, the administration of prothrombin complex concentrates showed variable results in various volunteer trials and efficacy at relatively high doses in animal studies. Recently, a Fab fragment of a monoclonal antibody (idarucizumab) was shown to be an effective reversal agent for dabigatran in human studies.

CONCLUSION

For the new generation of DOACs, several reversal strategies and specific antidotes are under evaluation, although most interventions need further evaluation in clinical trials.

Idarucizumab for Reversal of Dabigatran-Associated Anticoagulation

Objective: To review clinical data on idarucizumab for the reversal of dabigatran-associated anticoagulation. Data Sources: Articles for this review were identified via PubMed using the MeSH term dabigatran combined with the keyword idarucizumab. Additional online searches via PubMed and Google Scholar were conducted for both prescribing and cost information. Study Selection and Data Extraction: English-language clinical trials published between 1946 and May 2016 were included for review. Bibliographies of selected articles were also manually reviewed for relevant publications that focused on reversal strategies for dabigatran-associated anticoagulation. Data Synthesis: The safety and tolerability of idarucizumab has been evaluated in 3 phase I clinical trials. The use of idarucizumab for reversing dabigatran-associated anticoagulation is also being evaluated in the phase III RE-VERSE AD study. Interim results of the RE-VERSE AD study have been published. Conclusions: Idarucizumab rapidly neutralizes the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran in healthy volunteers, in patients with life-threatening bleeding, and in patients requiring urgent surgery that cannot be delayed. These observations are largely based on laboratory assessments rather than clinical outcomes. Idarucizumab is well tolerated, and it does not appear to induce procoagulant or immunogenic adverse effects.

Reversing the Effect of Oral Anticoagulant Drugs: Established and Newer Options

The vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) have been the standard (and only) oral anticoagulants used for the long-term treatment or prevention of venous thromboembolism or stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. The coagulopathy induced by VKAs can be reversed with vitamin K, and in urgent situations, the vitamin K-dependent coagulation factors can be replaced by transfusion. In the last decade, a new class of oral anticoagulants has been developed, direct oral anticoagulants that bind to a specific coagulation factor and neutralize it. These compounds were shown to be effective and safe compared with the VKAs and were licensed for specific indications, but without a specific reversal agent. The absence of a reversal agent is a barrier to more widespread use of these agents. Currently, for the management of major life-threatening bleeding with the direct oral anticoagulants, most authorities recommend the use of four factor prothrombin complex concentrates. There are now three reversal agents in development and poised to enter the market. Idarucizumab is a specific antidote targeted to reverse the direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran, which was recently approved for use in the USA. Andexanet alfa is an antidote targeted to reverse the oral direct factor Xa inhibitors as well as the indirect inhibitor enoxaparin. Ciraparantag is an antidote targeted to reverse the direct thrombin and factor Xa inhibitors as well as the indirect inhibitor enoxaparin.

New Target-Specific Oral Anticoagulants and Intracranial Bleeding: Management and Outcome in a Single-Center Case Series

INTRODUCTION

New target-specific anticoagulants such as the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and the factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban are used in an increasing number of patients. Several studies comparing these new oral anticoagulants with vitamin K antagonists revealed a lower risk of severe bleeding complications and reduced thromboembolic events. However, the lack of antidotes is a challenging issue in the treatment of traumatic or spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients with intracranial bleeding under new oral anticoagulants was performed; these patients were admitted to our department between January 2011 and November 2014. Treatment, reversal management of blood coagulopathy, and outcome of the patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients were included. The median age was 80.4 years. Seven patients were treated with dabigatran and 10 with rivaroxaban. Eight patients had traumatic intracranial bleeding and 9 patients had spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage. Complex perioperative hematologic treatment followed. In 9 cases, the clinical outcome was devastating with severe neurologic deficits (n = 2), comatose status (n = 4), or death (n = 3). Patients with the indication for acute surgical treatment had a high risk for a critical clinical outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Only a few case reports have analyzed the clinical course and the outcome after intracranial bleeding under new target-specific oral anticoagulants. Here, one of the first larger series is presented. Because of the lack of reversibility of the anticoagulative effects and the overall risks with geriatric patients, surgical treatment should be delayed as long as possible and comorbidities have to be considered.

Managing target-specific oral anticoagulant associated bleeding including an update on pharmacological reversal agents

Target-specific oral anticoagulants (TSOACs) dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban are approved for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolism in several clinical settings. Bleeding is the major complication of anticoagulant therapy, including TSOACs, and anticoagulant reversal strategies are highly desired for the management of anticoagulant-associated major bleeding in addition to maximum supportive care and procedural/surgical intervention. Unlike VKAs for which vitamin K and coagulation factor replacement with prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) can restore hemostasis, there are no clinically available agents proven to reverse TSOAC anticoagulant effect and ameliorate TSOAC-related major bleeding. This narrative review critically evaluates the evidence for TSOAC reversal using non-specific reversal agents PCC, activated PCC (APCC) and recombinant activated factor VII (rVIIa) which have been assessed primarily using in vitro experiments, animal models and healthy human volunteers. Aripazine is a novel agent undergoing clinical development for non-specific anticoagulant reversal, including TSOACs. Data are presented regarding specific reversal agents idarucizumab (dabigatran) and andexanet alfa (oral factor Xa inhibitors) currently being evaluated in clinical trials. A practical approach to management of patients with TSOAC-associated bleeding is also provided. There is an urgent need for clinical studies that evaluate the efficacy and safety of reversal strategies for TSOAC-related major bleeding with assessment of clinical outcomes such as bleeding and mortality.

Mortality outcomes in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used as an alternative for warfarin. However, the impact of DOACs on mortality outcomes compared with warfarin remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the mortality outcomes in patients treated with DOACs vs. warfarin (or another vitamin K antagonist).

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases (inception to September 2014), conference abstracts and www.clinicaltrials.gov, were searched, without language restriction. Studies were selected if there were phase III, randomized trials comparing DOACs with warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism.

RESULTS

Thirteen randomized controlled trials involving 102 707 adult patients were included in the analysis. The case-fatality rate of major bleeding was 7.57% (95% CI, 6.53-8.68; I(2) = 0%) in patients taking DOACs and 11.04% (95% CI, 9.16-13.07; I(2) = 33.3%) in patients taking warfarin. The rate of fatal bleeding in adult patients receiving DOACs was 0.16 per 100 patient-years (95% CI, 0.12-0.20; I(2) = 36.5%). When compared with warfarin, DOACs were associated with significant reductions in fatal bleeding (RR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.43-0.64; I(2) = 0%), cardiovascular mortality (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.82-0.94; I(2) = 0%) and all-cause mortality (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.87-0.96; I(2) = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of DOACs compared with warfarin is associated with a lower rate of fatal bleeding, case-fatality rate of major bleeding, cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality.

Dabigatran-Associated Intracranial Hemorrhage: Literature Review and Institutional Experience

Dabigatran etexilate is an oral direct thrombin inhibitor approved for prevention of stroke and systemic embolization in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and for the treatment of venous thromboembolism. Although dabigatran has a favorable safety profile, predictable pharmacokinetics, fewer drug interactions than warfarin, and does not require monitoring, clinical data regarding dabigatran reversal are limited. In addition, currently available laboratory assays allow measurement of the presence, but not extent, of dabigatran-associated anticoagulation. Patient age, renal function, weight, concurrent drug therapy, adherence, and concomitant disease states can affect dabigatran's efficacy and safety. Management of dabigatran-related intracranial hemorrhage must be approached on a case-by-case basis and include assessment of degree of anticoagulation, severity of hemorrhage, renal function, timing of last dabigatran dose, and risk of thromboembolic events. Initial management includes dabigatran discontinuation and general supportive measures. Oral activated charcoal should be administered in those who ingested dabigatran within 2 hours. Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrates (4PCCs), activated PCC, or recombinant activated factor VII use may be reasonable but is not evidence based. Reserve fresh frozen plasma for patients with dilutional coagulopathy. If readily available, hemodialysis should be considered, particularly in patients with advanced kidney injury or excessive risk of thromboembolic events. More clinical studies are needed to determine a standardized approach to treating dabigatran-associated intracranial hemorrhage. Institutional protocol development will facilitate safe, efficacious, and timely use of the limited management options.

Direct oral anticoagulants: new drugs and new concepts

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are approved for multiple thromboembolic disorders and provide advantages over existing agents. As with all anticoagulants, management protocols for the eventuality of bleeding are important. Randomized phase III studies generally show that DOACs have a similar risk of clinically relevant bleeding compared with standard anticoagulants, with reductions in major bleeding in some cases. This may be particularly important in patients with atrial fibrillation, for whom the rate of intracranial hemorrhage was approximately halved with DOACs compared with warfarin. Conversely, the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding may be increased. Specific patient characteristics, such as renal impairment, comedications, and particular aspects of each drug, including the proportion eliminated by the kidneys, must be taken into account when assessing the risk of bleeding. Although routine coagulation monitoring of DOACs is not required, it may be useful under some circumstances. Of the traditional clotting assays, a sensitive and calibrated prothrombin time may be useful for detecting the presence or absence of clinically relevant factor Xa inhibitor concentrations (rivaroxaban or apixaban), but specific anti-factor Xa assays can measure drug levels quantitatively. For dabigatran, the results of an activated partial thromboplastin time test may exclude a clinically relevant pharmacodynamic effect, but a calibrated dilute thrombin time assay can be used for quantification of drug levels. In the event of mild or moderate bleeding, normal hemostatic support measures are recommended. For life-threatening bleeding, use of nonspecific prohemostatic agents may be considered, although clinical evidence is scarce. Specific antidotes are in development.

Practical management of bleeding in patients receiving non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are increasingly used in the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism and in the prevention of stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. In phase III clinical trials and meta-analyses, the NOACs were at least as effective as vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and were associated with a similar or lower incidence of major bleeding, including consistent and significant decreases in intracranial bleeding, although with an increase in gastrointestinal bleeding for some agents compared with VKAs. Subsequent real-world evidence supports these outcomes. Despite this, physicians have concerns about serious bleeding or emergencies because there are no specific reversal agents for the NOACs. However, in clinical trials, patients receiving NOACs generally had similar or better outcomes after these events than those taking VKAs. As with any bleeding, anticoagulant-related bleeding should first be stratified according to severity and location; risk can be minimised by ongoing assessment. Management protocols for NOAC-related bleeding are similar to those for VKAs but should take into account the pharmacological profile of the specific drug. Because of their short half-lives, NOAC-related mild bleeding can often be controlled by temporarily withholding treatment. More severe bleeding requires standard escalating haemodynamic support measures, and non-specific reversal agents can be considered in life-threatening situations, based on limited clinical data. Specific and rapid reversal agents are not currently available for any oral anticoagulant and restoration of coagulation may not necessarily lead to better outcomes. Nevertheless, specific NOAC reversal agents are in development and show promise in healthy volunteers.

Antidotes for novel oral anticoagulants: current status and future potential

The direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and the anti-Xa agents rivaroxaban, edoxaban, and apixaban are a new generation of oral anticoagulants. Their advantage over the vitamin K antagonists is the lack of the need for monitoring and dose adjustment. Their main disadvantage is currently the absence of a specific reversal agent. Dabigatran's, unlike the anti-Xa agents, absorption can be reduced by activated charcoal if administered shortly after ingestion and it can be removed from the blood with hemodialysis. Prothrombin complex concentrate, activated prothrombin complex concentrate, and recombinant factor VIIa all show some activity in reversing the anticoagulant effect of these drugs but this is based on ex vivo, animal, and volunteer studies. It is unclear, which, if any, of these drugs is the most suitable for emergency reversal. Three novel molecules (idarucizumab, andexanet, and PER977) may provide the most effective and safest way of reversal. These agents are currently in premarketing studies.

Direct oral anticoagulants: key considerations for use to prevent stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia worldwide. Strokes that occur as a complication of AF are usually more severe and associated with a higher disability or morbidity and mortality rate compared with non-AF-related strokes. The risk of stroke in AF is dependent on several risk factors; AF itself acts as an independent risk factor for stroke. The combination of effective anticoagulation therapy, risk stratification (based on stroke risk scores, such as CHADS₂ and CHA₂DS₂-VASc), and recommendations provided by guidelines is essential for decreasing the risk of stroke in patients with AF. Although effective in preventing the occurrence of stroke, vitamin K antagonists (VKAs; eg, warfarin) are associated with several limitations. Therefore, direct oral anticoagulants, such as apixaban, dabigatran etexilate, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban, have emerged as an alternative to the VKAs for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular AF. Compared with the VKAs, these agents have more favorable pharmacological characteristics and, unlike the VKAs, they are given at fixed doses without the need for routine coagulation monitoring. It remains important that physicians use these direct oral anticoagulants responsibly to ensure optimal safety and effectiveness. This article provides an overview of the existing data on the direct oral anticoagulants, focusing on management protocols for aiding physicians to optimize anticoagulant therapy in patients with nonvalvular AF, particularly in special patient populations (eg, those with renal impairment) and other specific clinical situations.

Novel Oral Anticoagulants: Efficacy, Laboratory Measurement, and Approaches to Emergent Reversal

Warfarin, the most commonly used of the vitamin K antagonists, has been a mainstay of oral anticoagulation for decades. However, its usage is limited by morbidity and mortality secondary to bleeding as well as a cumbersome therapeutic monitoring process. In the past several years, a number of competing novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been developed, each of which aspires to match or exceed warfarin's effectiveness while mitigating bleeding risk and eliminating therapeutic monitoring requirements. At present, 1 oral direct thrombin inhibitor and 2 direct factor Xa inhibitors are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. Here, we compare the clinical efficacy and safety profiles of these new drugs. In addition, we discuss various laboratory assays that may be useful to measure these drugs in certain clinical circumstances. Finally, we discuss emerging strategies to reverse these agents in an emergency. The purpose of this article is to provide a framework for practicing pathologists to advise clinicians on NOAC laboratory measurement and management of NOAC-associated bleeding.

Management of oral anticoagulation in the surgical patient

New oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have recently emerged as an alternative for vitamin K antagonists and are now widely available. Although there is good evidence for their roles in the appropriate clinical settings, so far no reversal agent is currently available. Likewise, there is no readily available laboratory test to quantify drug levels but coagulation assays may provide qualitative information about the presence of some NOACs. We aim to review the current literature regarding the optimal management of oral anticoagulation in the perioperative setting.

Use of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate in the treatment of a gastrointestinal hemorrhage complicated by dabigatran

Target-specific oral anticoagulants (TSOACs) provide patients and healthcare providers with an alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKA). The TSOACs are of similar or superior efficacy to warfarin, but unlike VKAs, there are no approved ‘antidotes’ for rapid reversal of life-threatening bleeding on therapy. We report here the case of an 83-year-old gentleman, who presented to the emergency department with severe gastrointestinal hemorrhage and coagulopathy (hemoglobin: 5.3 g/dL and INR: 2.2) while on the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran. His coagulopathy reversed rapidly after administration of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4 F-PCC), and after initial administration of 2 units of packed red blood cells, no further product transfusions were required. He was discharged 4 days later without further complications.

Plasma and Plasma Protein Product Transfusion: A Canadian Blood Services Centre for Innovation Symposium

Plasma obtained via whole blood donation processing or via apheresis technology can either be transfused directly to patients or pooled and fractionated into plasma protein products that are concentrates of 1 or more purified plasma protein. The evidence base supporting clinical efficacy in most of the indications for which plasma is transfused is weak, whereas high-quality evidence supports the efficacy of plasma protein products in at least some of the clinical settings in which they are used. Transfusable plasma utilization remains composed in part of applications that fall outside of clinical practice guidelines. Plasma contains all of the soluble coagulation factors and is frequently transfused in efforts to restore or reinforce patient hemostasis. The biochemical complexities of coagulation have in recent years been rationalized in newer cell-based models that supplement the cascade hypothesis. Efforts to normalize widely used clinical hemostasis screening test values by plasma transfusion are thought to be misplaced, but superior rapid tests have been slow to emerge. The advent of non-vitamin K-dependent oral anticoagulants has brought new challenges to clinical laboratories in plasma testing and to clinicians needing to reverse non-vitamin K-dependent oral anticoagulants urgently. Current plasma-related controversies include prophylactic plasma transfusion before invasive procedures, plasma vs prothrombin complex concentrates for urgent warfarin reversal, and the utility of increased ratios of plasma to red blood cell units transfused in massive transfusion protocols. The first recombinant plasma protein products to reach the clinic were recombinant hemophilia treatment products, and these donor-free equivalents to factors VIII and IX are now being supplemented with novel products whose circulatory half-lives have been increased by chemical modification or genetic fusion. Achieving optimal plasma utilization is an ongoing challenge in the interconnected worlds of transfusable plasma, plasma protein products, and recombinant and engineered replacements.

New oral anticoagulants: a practical guide on prescription, laboratory testing and peri-procedural/bleeding management. Australasian Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis

New oral anticoagulants (NOAC) are becoming available as alternatives to warfarin to prevent systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and for the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism. An in-depth understanding of their pharmacology is invaluable for appropriate prescription and optimal management of patients receiving these drugs should unexpected complications (such as bleeding) occur, or the patient requires urgent surgery. The Australasian Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis has set out to inform physicians on the use of the different NOAC based on current available evidence focusing on: (i) selection of the most suitable patient groups to receive NOAC, (ii) laboratory measurements of NOAC in appropriate circumstances and (iii) management of patients taking NOAC in the perioperative period, and strategies to manage bleeding complications or 'reverse' the anticoagulant effects for urgent invasive procedures.

Reversal of Dabigatran Effects in Models of Thrombin Generation and Hemostasis by Factor VIIa and Prothrombin Complex Concentrate

Background:

The oral thrombin inhibitor dabigatran has the drawbacks that it does not have a validated antidote. Data from animal studies and plasma coagulation assays suggest that prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) or recombinant factor VIIa (FVIIa) might reverse dabigatran anticoagulation.

Methods:

Cellular elements make a significant contribution to hemostasis. Our goals were to (1) test the hypothesis that both FVIIa and a 4-factor PCC improve parameters of thrombin generation in the presence of dabigatran in a cell-based model; and (2) determine whether results in a cell-based model correlate with hemostasis in vivo.

Results:

PCC reversed dabigatran effects on the rate, peak, and total amount of thrombin but did not shorten the lag (n = 6 experiments in triplicate). By contrast, FVIIa shortened the lag, increased the rate and peak, but did not improve total thrombin (n = 6). Effects of PCC were seen at both therapeutic and markedly supratherapeutic dabigatran levels, whereas beneficial effects of FVIIa decreased as the dabigatran level increased. The PCC effect was reproduced by adding prothrombin, factor X, and factor IX. At therapeutic dabigatran levels, both PCC and FVIIa normalized hemostasis time in a mouse saphenous vein bleeding model.

Conclusions:

A cell-based model reflects the effects on thrombin generation of clinically relevant levels of FVIIa and PCC in the presence of dabigatran. Enhancing the rate of thrombin generation and peak thrombin level appear to correlate best with hemostasis in vivo. The ineffectiveness of FVIIa at supratherapeutic dabigatran levels may explain conflicting reports of its efficacy in dabigatran reversal.

Reversing targeted oral anticoagulants

Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban are orally active anticoagulants that are approved in many countries. Dabigatran inhibits thrombin, whereas rivaroxaban and apixaban are factor Xa inhibitors. In clinical trials, these novel oral anticoagulants were at least as effective as warfarin for preventing stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation, but with a lower rate of serious bleeding. However, the lack of true antidotes for these agents has caused concern when patients suffer life-threatening bleeding or trauma or require emergent invasive procedures. True antidotes are under development for all of these agents. In the meantime, activated and nonactivated prothrombin complex concentrates have been used as reversal agents. Factor VIIa may also be effective for reversal of the factor Xa inhibitors. Reversal of novel oral anticoagulants by these hemostatic agents has not been studied in bleeding human patients, so their true efficacy and appropriate dosing are not known.

A mouse bleeding model to study oral anticoagulants

New oral anticoagulants to reduce the incidence of thrombosis have recently become available. When compared to the existing therapy, warfarin, these novel agents have similar efficacy with a reduced risk of spontaneous bleeding. However, these novel agents have been associated with significant, even fatal, bleeding following trauma. Reversal agents are being developed that bind and neutralize these oral anticoagulants. However, these are not yet available. Another strategy is to increase thrombin generation by administration of "bypassing" agents such as prothrombin complex concentrates or factor VIIa. Several animal models have been used to model the hemostatic defect induced by the thrombin inhibitor dabigatran. A rat tail injury model, a rabbit cuticle bleeding model, and a rabbit kidney laceration model have all been reported to show increased bleeding, but with supratherapeutic doses of dabigatran. A mouse tail transection model has been reported to reflect increased bleeding at peak therapeutic dabigatran levels. We found that the Whinna saphenous vein hemostasis model reliably reflects a hemostatic defect at therapeutic levels of dabigatran. This model can potentially reflect the effects of reversal or bypassing agents.

Clinical Applications of 4-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate: A Practical Pathologist's Perspective

A 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC), containing therapeutic doses of vitamin K–dependent coagulation factors, was recently licensed in the United States for reversal of vitamin K antagonist therapy. However, given the emergence of several oral anticoagulants for which there are no specific reversal agents, and the existence of many other complex bleeding disorders, it is likely that clinicians will seek to use 4F-PCCs for any number of off-label indications. Thus, the goal of this review is to explore practical issues regarding 4F-PCC, with an emphasis on issues relevant to blood bankers and pathologists. Specifically, our aims are to (1) examine the role of 4F-PCC in vitamin K antagonist reversal, (2) review its potential use in the treatment of hemorrhage due to novel oral anticoagulants, and (3) explore potential uses in liver disease, trauma-associated bleeding, and rare coagulopathies. Safety and other practical considerations of 4F-PCCs will also be discussed.

Management of the bleeding patient receiving new oral anticoagulants: a role for prothrombin complex concentrates

Ease of dosing and simplicity of monitoring make new oral anticoagulants an attractive therapy in a growing range of clinical conditions. However, newer oral anticoagulants interact with the coagulation cascade in different ways than traditional warfarin therapy. Replacement of clotting factors will not reverse the effects of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban. Currently, antidotes for these drugs are not widely available. Fortunately, withholding the anticoagulant and dialysis are freqnently effective treatments, particularly with rivaroxaban and dabigatran. Emergent bleeding, however, requires utilization of Prothrombin Complex Concentrates (PCCs). PCCs, in addition to recombinant factor VIIa, are used to activate the clotting system to reverse the effects of the new oral anticoagulants. In cases of refractory or emergent bleeding, the recommended factor concentrate in our protocols differs between the new oral anticoagulants. In patients taking dabigatran, we administer an activated PCC (aPCC) [FELBA] due to reported benefit in human in vitro studies. Based on human clinical trial evidence, the 4-factor PCC (Kcentra) is suggested for patients with refractory rivaroxaban- or apixaban-associated hemorrhage. If bleeding continues, recombinant factor VIIa may be employed. With all of these new procoagulant agents, the risk of thrombosis associated with administration of factor concentrates must be weighed against the relative risk of hemorrhage.