A clinical evaluation of an improved Holter monitoring technique for artificial pacemaker function

Holter, loop recorder, and event counter capabilities of implanted devices

The current generation of cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators almost all have some capabilities to store data regarding device activity and patient events for future retrieval. This information may provide valuable information regarding device function and whether this is proving valuable in patient management. Examples include "pace-sense" counters, which can reveal under sensing of patient events, and serial lead impedance measurements, which are able to demonstrate trends not seen on isolated measurements. Holter capabilities become vital in more advanced devices for documenting the utility of, and fine tuning the programming of features such as antitachycardia pacing, rate-responsiveness, and mode-switching. Finally, the ability to store patient events as marker channels and even intracardiac electrograms adds a diagnostic capability not available through external monitoring. This role has now been advanced by the development of a purely diagnostic implantable loop recorder.

Ambulatory electrocardiography for the detection of pacemaker lead failure

The suboptimal performance of some polyurethane bipolar pacing leads has highlighted concern about the optimal method of monitoring pacemaker lead performance. Since the manifestations of premature lead failure may be initially intermittent, we hypothesized that ambulatory electrocardiography (AECG) would be a more sensitive tool for the detection of pacing lead failure compared to increased pacemaker clinic surveillance. Since the Medtronic safety alerts on the 4012, 4082, and 4004 leads, we have followed 261 patients by serial AECG and 165 patients by increased pacemaker clinic surveillance. Lead failures were identified in 75 patients: 68 in the AECG group (31%) and 7 in the clinic group (4%, P < 0.001). Repeat AECG confirmed the lead failure in 38 (97%) of 39 patients in which it could be done. Pacing lead failure documented by AECG could be confirmed by a subsequent clinic assessment in only 15 (25%) of 60 patients evaluated (P < 0.001). The actuarial survival of the 4012 lead was significantly lower in the AECG group compared to the clinic group (56% vs 87% survival at 8 years, P < 0.002). Similar trends were observed for the 4082 and 4004 leads. AECG is a more sensitive method of surveillance for pacemaker lead function compared to pacemaker clinic assessment. AECG should be incorporated into the routine follow-up of pacemaker patients.

Fusion or confusion on Holter recording

Holter recording of a patient with an implanted dual chamber rate responsive pacemaker revealed an electrocardiogram, where ventricular depolarization seemed to be initiated by the atrial stimulus. In a second patient with a VVI pacemaker, Holter recording showed delay of the pacemaker impulse that was registered after the onset of ventricular depolarization. Misalignment in one of the recorder heads of the display system was responsible for this phenomenon, which in case of dual chamber pacing could have been easily misinterpreted as pacemaker malfunction.

Computerized interpretation of the paced ECG

Analysis of the paced electrocardiogram (ECG) is important to the follow-up evaluation of patients with implanted pacemakers. Because of the complexity and variability of pacemaker algorithms, diagnosis of paced ECGs is often considerably more difficult than the interpretation of usual ECGs. Automated interpretation of the paced ECG can provide great clinical benefit because few clinicians are adequately trained in the diagnosis of such ECGs for the interpretation of pacemaker functionality. However, comparatively little work has been done in this area, mainly because the diversity and complexity of pacemaker logic makes interpretation, automated or manual, a difficult task. The following paper reviews research in computer interpretation of the pacemaker ECG and presents a new automated method which yields more detailed and accurate results than any previous technique.

Utility of ambulatory electrocardiography in detecting pacemaker dysfunction in the early postimplantation period

The value of ambulatory electrocardiography (AECG) in detecting pacemaker dysfunction before hospital discharge was assessed in 100 patients a mean of 1.2 days after pacemaker implantation. The incidence of permanent pacemaker dysfunction detected by AECG in the early postimplantation period, the frequency that pacemaker dysfunction detected by AECG was not detected by telemetric monitoring and the frequency that results of AECG led to pacemaker reprogramming before hospital discharge were determined. AECG detected at least 1 type of pacemaker dysfunction in 35% of patients and routine telemetry identified the abnormality in only 8% (p less than 0.001). Pacemaker dysfunction occurred in 42% of patients with dual-chamber devices and 27% of those with single-chamber devices (difference not significant). In the 35 patients who had pacemaker malfunction, a total of 50 instances of pacemaker dysfunction were detected. Failure of atrial capture occurred in 2% of patients, failure of atrial sensing in 9%, failure of atrial output in 1%, failure of ventricular capture in 8%, failure of ventricular sensing in 14%, failure of ventricular output due to myopotential inhibition in 11% and pacemaker-mediated tachycardia in 5%. The results of the AECG led to a clinical intervention in 22 patients (pacemaker reprogramming in 21 patients and lead repositioning in 1 patient) in whom no pacemaker dysfunction was suspected on the basis of telemetry or clinical symptoms. In conclusion, AECG provides additional benefit beyond that of routine telemetry monitoring in identifying pacemaker dysfunction in the early period after implantation.

Ambulatory electrocardiography and computer technology--practical advantages

Ambulatory electrocardiography has employed computer technology for more than two decades. This review pertains to current state-of-the-art interaction between ambulatory electrocardiography and computer technology with regard to data analysis, quantitation and standardization, data formatting, data storage and retrieval, and comparative interpretation of ambulatory ECGs. This report also addresses evolving techniques expected in the near future.