Ventricular fibrillation after intravenous atropine in a patient with atrioventricular block

Administration of atropine in the setting of acute myocardial infarction: potentiation of the ischemic process?

Atropine has also been suggested to potentially worsen the ischemic situation in patients who are in the midst of acute coronary ischemia. We report the case of a female patient with ischemic chest pain and third degree atrioventricular block who developed acute myocardial infarction (AMI) immediately after atropine administration. The use of atropine in this instance remains a reasonable option and should be strongly considered-despite this apparent complication. Undoubtedly in some cases, acute ischemia is intensified by hypoperfusion attributable to vagally mediated bradyarrhythmia; atropine is the antidote for such situations. An awareness of this potential adverse reaction coupled with a prudent selection of candidates for atropine therapy will show the risk/benefit ratio in each individual patient and, therefore, guide the clinician.

Acute myocardial infarction complicated by hemodynamically unstable bradyarrhythmia: prehospital and ED treatment with atropine

The purpose of this study was to investigate the therapeutic response to atropine of patients experiencing hemodynamically compromising bradyarrhythmia related to acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the prehospital (PH) setting and the therapeutic impact of the PH response to atropine on further Emergency Department (ED) care. In addition, the prevalence of AMI in patients presenting with atrioventricular block (AVB) is noted. Retrospective review of PH, emergency department (ED), and hospital records. PH patients, with hemodynamically compromising bradycardia or AVB with evidence of spontaneous circulation, who received atropine as delivered by emergency medical services (EMS) personnel, were used. Urban/suburban fire department-based emergency medical services (EMS) system with on-line medical control serving a population of approximately 1.6 million persons. Hemodynamic instability was defined as the presence of any of the following: ischemic chest pain, dyspnea, syncope, altered mental status, and systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg. Bradycardia was defined as sinus bradycardia, junctional bradycardia, or idioventricular bradycardia (grouped as bradycardia), whereas AVB included first-, second- (types I and II), or third-degree (grouped as AVB). The response that occurred within 1 minute of atropine dosing was recorded as none, partial, complete, or adverse. Comparisons were made between patients with AMI and non-AMI hospital discharge diagnoses. The diagnosis of AMI was confirmed by abnormal elevations in creatinine phosphokinase MB fraction. One hundred seventy-two patients meeting entry criteria were identified. Of these, 131 (76.1%) had complete PH, ED, and hospital records and were used for data analysis. Forty-five patients (34.3%) had a primary hospital discharge diagnosis of AMI; the remaining patients had a non-AMI discharge diagnosis. AMI patients were significantly younger (67 +/- 12 v 73 +/- 13 years, P = .025), were less likely to have a history of heart disease (35.5% v54.7%, P = .038), and were more likely to present with chest pain (68.9% v24.4%, P < .001) or hypotension (60% v37.2%, P = .013) compared with non-AMI patients. Forty-five of 131 patients presented with AVB, of which 25 had a hospital discharge diagnosis of AMI (55.6%). The mean time from first dose of atropine to ED arrival and the total dose of atropine received in the PH setting did not differ between AMI and non-AMI groups (15.2 +/- 7.7 v 16.2 +/- 8.7 minutes, P= .5; and 0.9 +/- 0.49 v 1.0 +/- 0.58 mg, P = .25). The likelihood of achieving normal sinus rhythm in the PH setting did not differ between AMI and non-AMI groups (40% v 18.6%, P = .07). No differences were found between AMI and non-AMI groups in the amount of additional atropine given (1.2 +/- 0.58 v 1.3 +/- 1.1 mg, P = .58) or the use of other resuscitative therapies after ED arrival (isoproterenol, 13.3% v12.8%, P = .93; dopamine, 28.9% v26.7% P = .79; transcutaneous pacing, 26.7% v26.7%, P = .99; transvenous pacing, 8.9% v5.8%, P = .51), with the exception of thrombolytic therapy (24.4% v 0%, P< .001) and cardiac catheterization (22.2% v3.4%, P = .001). Despite a lack of significant difference in achieving a normal sinus rhythm in the prehospital or ED setting, AMI patients were more likely to achieve a normal sinus rhythm over the total course of PH and ED care than non-AMI patients (44.4% v24.4%, P = .019). Hemodynamically unstable (by ACLS criterion) AVB presenting in the PH setting is associated with a hospital diagnosis of AMI in most (55.6%) patients in this study. AMI patients with hemodynamically unstable AVB or bradycardia are no more likely to respond to atropine therapy in the PH setting than patients with non-AMI hospital diagnoses. Finally, although there is no difference in the treatment of compromising AVB or bradycardia received by AMI versus non-AMI patients in the PH or ED setting, AMI patients are more likely to achieve a normal sinus rhythm over the t

The efficacy of atropine in the treatment of hemodynamically unstable bradycardia and atrioventricular block: prehospital and emergency department considerations

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy of atropine therapy in patients with hemodynamically compromising bradycardia or atrioventricular block (AVB) in the prehospital and emergency department settings.

METHODS

DESIGN

Retrospective review of prehospital, emergency department, and hospital records.

PARTICIPANTS

Prehospital patients with hemodynamically compromising bradycardia or AVB with evidence of spontaneous circulation who received atropine as delivered by emergency medical services personnel (advanced life support level).

SETTING

Urban/suburban fire department-based emergency medical service system with on-line medical control serving a population of approximately 1.6 million persons.

DEFINITIONS

Hemodynamic instability was defined as the presence of any of the following: ischemic chest pain, dyspnea, syncope, altered mental status, and systolic blood pressure less than 90 mmHg. Bradycardia was defined as sinus bradycardia, junctional bradycardia, or idioventricular bradycardia (grouped as bradycardia) while AVB included first-, second- (types I and II), or third-degree (grouped as AVB). The response that occurred within one minute following each dose of atropine was defined as none, partial, complete, or adverse.

MAIN RESULTS

Of 172 patients meeting entry criterion complete data was available for 131 (76.1%) and constitutes the study population. The mean age was 71 years. Fifty-one percent were female. Forty-five patients had AVB and 86 bradycardia. Patients with AVB were more likely to have a presenting systolic blood pressure less than 90 mmHg than those with bradycardia. In the 131 patients, responses to atropine were as follows: 26 (19.8%) = partial, 36 (27.5%) = complete, 65 (49.6%) = none, and 4 (2.3%) = adverse. Patients presenting with bradycardia (compared to AVB) more commonly: (1) received a single dose of atropine; (2) a lower total dose of atropine in the prehospital interval; (3) were more likely to arrive in the ED with a normal sinus rhythm; and (4) were less likely to receive additional atropine or isoproterenol in the ED. Those patients who achieved normal sinus rhythm over the total course of care were likely to have achieved that rhythm during the prehospital interval. There was no difference between groups in the likelihood of leaving the ED with a normal sinus rhythm achieved during the ED interval. Acute myocardial infarction was more common in patients presenting with AVB (55.5%) than with bradycardia (23.2%, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately one-half of patients who received atropine in the prehospital setting for compromising rhythms had either a partial or complete response to therapy. Adverse responses were uncommon. Those patients who presented with hemodynamically unstable bradycardia to EMS personnel responded more commonly to a single dose and a lower total dose of atropine compared to similar patients with AVB. Those patients who achieve normal sinus rhythm by ED discharge were likely to have achieved it during the prehospital interval.

Potentiating effect of acetylcholine on stimulation by isoproterenol of L-type Ca2+ current and arrhythmogenic triggered activity in guinea pig ventricular myocytes

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to determine whether the effect of isoproterenol (Iso) to increase L-type Ca2+ current [I(Ca(L))] and action potential duration (APD) was potentiated in ventricular myocytes following termination of an exposure of these cells to acetylcholine (ACh), and whether this potentiating effect of ACh could be arrhythmogenic.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Transmembrane currents and potentials of guinea pig isolated ventricular myocytes were measured using the whole cell, patch clamp technique. Stimulation of I(Ca(L)) and prolongation of APD caused by Iso (10 nmol/L) were attenuated in the presence of ACh (10 micromol/L), but were transiently enhanced by 111% +/- 20% and 214% +/- 44%, respectively, following termination of a 2- to 4-minute exposure of myocytes to ACh. No changes were observed in the absence of Iso. Both the amplitude and incidence of Iso-induced transient inward current, afterdepolarizations, and sustained triggered activity were greater immediately after termination of exposure to ACh than before application of ACh.

CONCLUSION

Stimulation by Iso of I(Ca(L)) is transiently enhanced in guinea pig ventricular myocytes following termination of exposure of these cells to ACh. The rebound increase of Iso-stimulated I(Ca(L)) is associated with an increase of APD and induction of arrhythmogenic triggered activity.

Evaluation and management of bradyarrhythmias in the emergency department

Bradyarrhythmias may be due to varied causes, although acute myocardial infarction, hypoxia, sepsis, and hypothermia should be considered. Emergency department therapy consists of treatment of the underlying cause, pharmacologic interventions, and temporary pacing. This article provides a detailed discussion of the causes and treatment of bradyarrhythmias in the emergency department.