A central venous temperature sensing lead

Temperature may be an appropriate sensor for chronotropically incompetent patients with postural syncope

Chronotropically incompetent patients benefit most from sensor driven rate response during exercise. Postural syncope may occur despite the chronotropic response because of the failure of currently available sensors to respond physiologically to postural changes. Seven chronotropically incompetent patients with postural syncope who had a dual chamber rate adaptive pacemaker (Circadia) that modulates heart rate in response to temperature change were studied with respect to: (1) response to exercise; and (2) head-up tilt (HUT). During exercise, continuous-wave Doppler of aortic velocities and two-dimensional echocardiographic derived measurements of left ventricular systolic function were used to assess cardiac function. Patients exercised longer (by an average of 168 sec) in the DDDR compared to the DDI mode (P = 0.013). Increase in exercise duration was due mostly to the sensor driven increase during DDDR pacing. During DDDR pacing, heart rate increased from 71 +/- 6 to 121 +/- 17 ppm compared to 70 +/- 1 to 103 +/- 21 ppm for the DDI pacing (P = 0.038). Stroke volume as assessed by Doppler derived stroke distance (SD) contributed more significantly to the cardiac output increase during exercise in the DDI mode (SD increased from 13.4 +/- 4 to 18 +/- 7 cm in DDI compared to 13 +/- 4 to 14 +/- 2 cm in DDDR mode), although these mechanisms were insufficient to fully compensate for failure of appropriate chronotropic response. In response to the HUT, right ventricular temperature increased from 36.78 degrees C +/- 0.29 degrees C to 36.89 degrees +/- 0.28 degrees C (P = 0.0002), and heart rate increased from 54 +/- 3 to 71 +/- 8 ppm (P = 0.0003) in the DDDR mode. No significant change in heart rate occurred in the DDI mode in response to the HUT. Strong positive correlation of temperature and heart rate was noted in all patients in response to HUT (P = 0.001, R2 = 0.755-0.976). We conclude that temperature sensor responds physiologically to exercise and HUT. Therefore, temperature sensing rate adaptive dual chamber pacing may be appropriate for chronotropically incompetent patients with posture related syncope.

Evaluation of the temperature response to exercise testing in patients with single chamber, rate adaptive pacemakers: a multicenter study

Temperature responsive pacemakers were implanted in 45 patients (ages 44 to 90); 31 patients were evaluated by randomized, paired treadmill exercise tests 1 month postimplant. Of 28 males and 17 females, 19 had coronary artery disease; 8 had congestive heart failure. Pacing indications included sinus node disease (26), atrial fibrillation (15), AV block (10), and brady/tachy syndrome (10); some had multiple indications. Blood temperature (every 10 seconds, resolution = 0.004 degrees C) and pacing rate (every minute) were telemetered from the pacemaker. Average heart rate, exercise duration (5.7 min VVI; 6.7 min VVIR), VVIR response time (22 sec), initial temperature drop (0.23 degrees C) and maximum rate of drop (0.65 degrees C/min), temperature rise (0.31 degrees C VVI; 0.38 degrees C VVIR) and rate of rise (0.27 degrees C/min) were studied in a subset of patients. In pacer-dependent patients, average paired increases in exercise duration and heart rate was 56% and 34%, respectively. Including all (31) patients, some with intermittent sinus rhythm, increases were 28% and 9%, respectively. Because exercise duration increased, temperature rise was higher with rate adaptation. Rate adaptation was obtainable in all patients and patients averaged 99 +/- 48 increases above basic pacing rate per day at nominal temperature sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

Beneficial rate adaptation is achievable using blood temperature to modify rate in a sensor based system.