Comparison of intrinsic versus paced ventricular function

Cardiomyopathy induced by artificial cardiac pacing: myth or reality sustained by evidence?

Implantable cardiac pacing systems are a safe and effective treatment for symptomatic irreversible bradycardia. Under the proper indications, cardiac pacing might bring significant clinical benefit. Evidences from literature state that the action of the artificial pacing system, mainly when the ventricular lead is located at the apex of the right ventricle, produces negative effects to cardiac structure (remodeling, dilatation) and function (dissinchrony). Patients with previously compromised left ventricular function would benefit the least with conventional right ventricle apical pacing, and are exposed to the risk of developing higher incidence of morbidity and mortality for heart failure. However, after almost 6 decades of cardiac pacing, just a reduced portion of patients in general would develop these alterations. In this context, there are not completely clear some issues related to cardiac pacing and the development of this cardiomyopathy. Causality relationships among QRS widening with a left bundle branch block morphology, contractility alterations within the left ventricle, and certain substrates or clinical (previous systolic dysfunction, structural heart disease, time from implant) or electrical conditions (QRS duration, percentage of ventricular stimulation) are still subjecte of debate. This review analyses contemporary data regarding this new entity, and discusses alternatives of how to use cardiac pacing in this context, emphasizing cardiac resynchronization therapy.

The prescription of minimal ventricular pacing

Contemporary devices include sophisticated algorithms specifically designed to minimize ventricular pacing, with the intention of limiting the patient's exposure to potentially deleterious effects of right ventricular pacing. The added complexity and adverse effects (some potentially life-threatening) associated with the use of these algorithms are often under-appreciated. The operational features, efficacy, and the potential adverse effects associated with one of these algorithms to minimize ventricular pacing-the Managed Ventricular Pacing™ algorithm-are reviewed to guide the appropriate prescription of this therapy.

Dual Site Right Atrial Pacing can Improve the Impact of Standard Dual Chamber Pacing on Atrial and Ventricular Mechanical Function in Patients with Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation: Further Observations from the Dual Site Atrial Pacing for Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation Trial

BACKGROUND

The effects of atrial pacing mode on atrial and ventricular function in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and bradycardia have not been evaluated. We evaluated atrial and ventricular function during randomization to support pacing (SP), high right atrial pacing (HRA), and dual site right atrial pacing (DAP).

METHODS

Seventy-nine patients (66 +/- 12 yr, 46 male) with standard pacing indications and symptomatic AF were randomized to each of three pacing modes (DAP, HRA, SP) for 6 months in a crossover design. Echocardiographic studies were performed at enrollment and the end of each mode. Paired comparisons of atrial and ventricular function parameters were performed between each pacing mode and baseline.

RESULTS

HRA pacing in DDDR mode resulted in increased left ventricular (LV) end systolic volume (78 +/- 42 vs. 60 +/- 31 ml, p = 0.001) and reduced LV ejection fraction (44 +/- 14 vs. 50 +/- 11%, p = 0.007) compared to baseline. These parameters did not change during DAP. DAP resulted in increased peak A wave velocity (75 +/- 19 vs. 63 +/- 23 cm/s, p = 0.003) and atrial filling fraction compared to baseline (0.47 +/- 0.15 vs. 0.38 +/- 0.13, p = 0.005). Atrial and ventricular function were similar between control and SP.

CONCLUSION

DAP, but not HRA or SP, improved left atrial (LA) function in patients with AF and bradycardia. HRA pacing in DDDR mode resulted in LA dilatation and deterioration of LV function which was not observed with DAP.

Is right ventricular outflow tract pacing an alternative to left ventricular/biventricular pacing?

The right ventricular apex has been used as the traditional pacing site since the development of transvenous pacing in 1959. Some studies suggest that pacing the right ventricular apex may cause remodeling and is harmful. In the past decade, there have been a multitude of studies of the hemodynamic, electrophysiological, electrocardiographic, and clinical effects of ventricular pacing at other sites. Pacing of the left ventricle singly or with biventricular pacing has emerged as an effective and safe therapy for moderate to severe congestive heart failure in patients with prolonged QRS complexes. Studies of alternate right ventricular sites, like the right ventricular outflow tract, have given mixed results. Not all patients can be treated with left ventricular pacing, which is a time-consuming and difficult procedure. Right ventricular pacing is easier and less expensive than left ventricular pacing and further study of additional right ventricular sites seems warranted.

Direct His-Bundle Pacing:. Present and Future

Direct His-bundle pacing (DHBP) produces rapid sequential multisite synchronous ventricular activation and, therefore, would be an ideal alternative to right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing. In 54 patients with cardiomyopathy, ejection fraction (EF) 0.23 +/- 0.11, persistent atrial fibrillation, and normal QRS < 120 ms. DHBP was attempted. This was successful in 39 patients. In seven patients, the effect of increasing heart rate on contractility (Treppe effect) was investigated. Twelve patients who also received a RVA lead underwent cardiopulmonary testing. After a mean follow-up of 42 months, 29 patients are still alive with EF improving from 0.23 +/- 0.11 to 0.33 +/- 0.15. Functional class improved from 3.5 to 2.2. DP/dt increased at each pacing site (P < 0.05) as the heart rate increased to 60, 100, and 120 beats/min. Rise in dP/dt by DHBP pacing at 120 beats/min was at least 170 +/- mmHg/s, greater than any other site in the ventricle (P < 0.05). Cardiopulmonary testing revealed longer exercise time (RVA 255 +/- 110 s) (His 280 +/- 104 s) (P < 0.05), higher O2 uptake (RVA 15 +/- 4 mL/kg per minute) (His 16 +/- 4 mL/kg minute) (P < 0.05), and later anaerobic threshold (RVA 126 +/- 71 s) (His 145 +/- 74 s) (P < 0.05) with DHBP compared to RVA pacing. Long-term DHBP is safe and effective in humans. DHBP is associated with a superior Treppe effect and increased cardiopulmonary reserve when compared to RVA pacing.

Dual chamber versus single chamber ventricular pacemakers for sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block

BACKGROUND

Dual chamber pacing or single chamber atrial pacing ('physiologic' pacing) is believed to have an advantage over single chamber ventricular pacing in that it resembles cardiac physiology more closely by maintaining atrioventricular (AV) synchrony and dominance of the sinus node, which in turn may reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality thus contributing to patient survival and quality of life. However, a significant proportion of pacemakers currently implanted are single chamber ventricular pacemakers.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess the short- and long-term clinical effectiveness of dual chamber pacemakers compared to single chamber ventricular pacemakers in adults with AV block, sick sinus syndrome or both. An additional objective was to assess separately any potential differences in effectiveness between dual chamber pacing and single chamber atrial pacing. The clinical effectiveness of single chamber atrial pacing versus single chamber ventricular pacing was not examined.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2002), MEDLINE (1966 to 2002), EMBASE (1980 to 2002) and the Science Citation Index (1980 to 2002) were searched on 19th August 2002. Citation lists and web sites were checked and researchers in the field contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Parallel group or crossover randomised controlled trials of at least 48 hours duration comparing dual chamber pacing and single chamber ventricular pacing, and investigating cardiovascular morbidity, mortality, patient related quality of life, exercise capacity and complication rates.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data was extracted onto pre-piloted data extraction forms. Quality assessment was undertaken using a checklist, with a sub-sample of quality data independently extracted by a second reviewer. Where appropriate data was available, meta-analysis was performed. Where meta-analysis was not possible, the number of studies showing a positive, neutral or negative direction of effect and statistical significance were simply counted.

MAIN RESULTS

Five parallel and 26 crossover randomised controlled trials were identified. The quality of reporting was found to be poor. Pooled data from parallel studies shows a statistically non-significant preference for physiologic pacing (primarily dual chamber pacing) for the prevention of stroke, heart failure and mortality, and a statistically significant beneficial effect regarding the prevention of atrial fibrillation (odds ratio (OR) 0.79, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.93). Both parallel and crossover studies favour dual chamber pacing with regard to pacemaker syndrome (parallel: Peto OR 0.11, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.14; crossover: standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.74, 95% CI - 0.95 to -0.52). Pooled data from crossover studies shows a statistically significant trend towards dual chamber pacing being more favourable in terms of exercise capacity (SMD -0.24, 95% CI -0.03 to -0.45). No individual studies reported a significantly more favourable outcome with single chamber ventricular pacing.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

This review shows a trend towards greater effectiveness with dual chamber pacing compared to single chamber ventricular pacing, which supports the current British Pacing and Electrophysiology Group's Guidelines regarding atrioventricular block. Additional randomised controlled trial evidence from ongoing trials in this area will further inform the debate.

Permanent, direct His-bundle pacing: a novel approach to cardiac pacing in patients with normal His-Purkinje activation

BACKGROUND

Direct His-bundle pacing (DHBP) produces synchronous ventricular depolarization and improved cardiac function relative to apical pacing. Although it has been performed transiently in the electrophysiology laboratory and persistently in open-chested canines, permanent DHBP in humans has not been achieved.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 18 patients aged 69+/-10 years who had a history of chronic atrial fibrillation, dilated cardiomyopathy, and normal activation (ie, QRS< or =120 ms) were screened for permanent DHBP using an electrophysiology catheter. In 14 patients, the His bundle could be reliably stimulated. Of these 14, permanent DHBP using a fixed screw-in lead was successful in 12 patients. Radiofrequency atrioventricular node ablation was performed in patients exhibiting a fast ventricular response. All patients received single-chamber rate-responsive pacemakers. Acute pacing thresholds were 2.4+/-1.0 V at a pulse duration of 0.5 ms. Lead complications included exit block requiring reoperative adjustment and gross lead dislodgment. Echocardiographic improvement in heart function was shown by reductions in the left ventricular end-diastolic dimension from 59+/-8 to 52+/-6 mm (P</=0.01) and in the end-systolic dimension from 51+/-10 to 43+/-8 mm (P<0.01), with an accompanying increase in fractional shortening from 14+/-7% to 20+/-10% (P=0.05). The left ventricular ejection fraction improved from 20+/-9% to 31+/-11% (P<0. 01), and the cardiothoracic ratio decreased from 0.61+/-0.06 to 0. 57+/-0.07 (P<0.01). Despite DHBP, 2 patients died at 8 and 36 months. Conclusions-Permanent DHBP is feasible in select patients who have chronic atrial fibrillation and dilated cardiomyopathy. Long-term, DHBP results in a reduction of left ventricular dimensions and improved cardiac function.

Pacing for patients with congestive heart failure and dilated cardiomyopathy

Considerable evidence has now accumulated that permanent pacing may provide symptomatic benefit for at least some patients with CHF. Recently, the most promising results with left ventricular or biventricular pacing have been obtained. The data for improvement in survival with pacing is less compelling. The mortality of CHF associated with systolic dysfunction of the left ventricle remains high and arrhythmic deaths are frequent. Clinical trials such as the Sudden Cardiac Death Heart Failure Trial (SCD-HeFT) are currently underway to investigate the role of the implantable defibrillator in patients with heart failure. The development and general availability of ICDs with biventricular pacing capability may play an increasingly important role in the overall therapeutic plan for this group of patients to allow for optimization of functional status with pacing and protection from sudden cardiac death with defibrillation.

Preserving normal ventricular activation versus atrioventricular delay optimization during pacing: the role of intrinsic atrioventricular conduction and pacing rate

The purpose of the study was to compare the effects of DDD pacing with optimal AV delay and AAI pacing on the systolic and diastolic performance at rest in patients with prolonged intrinsic AV conduction (first-degree AV block). We studied 17 patients (8 men, aged 69 +/- 9 years) with dual chamber pacemakers implanted for sick sinus syndrome in 15 patients and paroxysmal high degree AV block in 2 patients. Aortic flow and mitral flow were evaluated using Doppler echocardiography. Study protocol included the determination of the optimal AV delay in the DDD mode and comparison between AAI and DDD with optimal AV delay for pacing rate 70/min and 90/min. Stimulus-R interval during AAI (ARI) was 282 +/- 68 ms for rate 70/min and 330 +/- 98 ms for rate 90/min (P < 0.01). The optimal AV delay was 159 +/- 22 ms. AV delay optimization resulted in an increase of an aortic flow time velocity integral (AFTVI) of 16% +/- 9%. At rate 70/min the patients with ARI < or = 270 ms had higher AFTVI in AAI than in DDD (0.214 +/- 0.05 m vs 0.196 +/- 0.05 m, P < 0.01), while the patients with ARI > 270 ms demonstrated greater AFTVI under DDD compared to AAI (0.192 +/- 0.03 m vs 0.166 +/- 0.02 m, P < 0.01). At rate 90/min AFTVI was higher during DDD than AAI (0.183 +/- 0.03 m vs 0.162 +/- 0.03 m, P < 0.01). Mitral flow time velocity integral (MFTVI) at rate 70/min was higher in DDD than in AAI (0.189 +/- 0.05 m vs 0.173 +/- 0.05 m, P < 0.01), while at rate 90/min the difference was not significant in favor of DDD (0.149 +/- 0.05 m vs 0.158 +/- 0.04 m). The results suggest that in patients with first-degree AV block the relative impact of DDD and AAI pacing modes on the systolic performance depends on the intrinsic AV conduction time and on pacing rate.

Rate adaptive atrial pacing in the bradycardia tachycardia syndrome

In 42 patients (26 men, 16 women; mean age 69 +/- 10 years), who were paced and medicated with antiarrhythmic drugs for the bradycardia tachycardia syndrome, chronotropic response and AV conduction with rapid atrial pacing during exercise were studied. Patients were included if they had no second- or third-degree AV block, no complete bundle branch or bifascicular block, and a PQ interval < or = 240 ms during sinus rhythm at rest. The interval between the atrial spike and the following Q wave (SQ) was measured in the supine position at rest with an AAI pacing rate of 5 beats/min above the sinus rate (SQ-R + 5), and at the end of exercise with 110 beats/min (SQ-E110). Bicycle ergometry was performed using the Chronotropic Assessment Exercise Protocol with the pacemakers being programmed to AAI with a fixed rate of 60 beats/min. Chronotropic incompetence was defined as peak exercise heart rate: (1) < 100 beats/min; (2) < 75% of the maximum predicted heart rate; or (3) the heart rate at half the maximum workload < 60 + 2 beats/min per mL O2/kg per minute (calculated O2 consumption). During exercise, one patient developed atrial fibrillation. Chronotropic incompetence was present in 71% (29/41) of the patients according to definition 2, and in 76% (31/41) according to definition 1 or 3. Ten out of 41 patients (24%) exhibited a second-degree AV block with atrial pacing at 110 beats/min at the end of exercise. Only 9 out of the remaining 31 patients (29%) showed a physiological adaptation of the SQ-E110, and 21 patients (68%) exhibited a paradoxical increase of the SQ interval with rapid atrial pacing at the end of exercise as compared to the SQ-R + 5. These observations indicate that the pacing system to be used in most patients paced and medicated for the bradycardia tachycardia syndrome should be dual chamber, and the option of rate adaptation should be considered.

AAIR versus DDDR pacing in patients with impaired sinus node chronotropy: an echocardiographic and cardiopulmonary study

The aim of this study was to compare AAIR and DDDR pacing at rest and during exercise. We studied 15 patients (10 men, age 65 +/- 6 years) who had been paced for at least 3 months with activity sensor rate modulated dual chamber pacemakers. All had sick sinus syndrome (SSS) with impaired sinus node chronotropy. The patients underwent a resting echocardiographic evaluation of systolic and diastolic LV function at 60 beats/min during AAIR and DDDR pacing with an AV delay, which ensured complete ventricular activation capture. Cardiac output (CO) was also measured during pacing at 100 beats/min in both pacing modes. Subsequently, the oxygen consumption (VO2AT) and VO2AT pulse at the anaerobic threshold were measured during exercise in AAIR mode and in DDDR mode with an AV delay of 120 ms. The indices of diastolic function showed no significant differences between the two pacing modes, except for patients with a stimulus-R interval > 220 ms, for whom the time velocity integral of LV filling and LV inflow time were significantly lower under AAI than under DDD pacing. At 60 beats/min, CO was higher under AAI than under DDD mode only when the stimulus-R interval was below 220 ms. For stimulus-R intervals longer than 220 ms, and also during pacing at 100 beats/min, the CO was higher in DDD mode. The stimulus-R interval decreased in all patients during exercise. The time to anaerobic threshold, VO2AT, and VO2AT pulse showed no significant differences between the two pacing modes. Our results indicate that, at rest, although AAIR pacing does not improve diastolic function in patients with SSS, it maintains a higher CO than does DDDR pacing in cases where the stimulus-R interval is not excessively prolonged. On exertion, the two pacing modes appear to be equally effective, at least in cases where the stimulus-R interval decreases in AAIR mode.

Acute hemodynamic effects of atrioventricular pacing at differing sites in the right ventricle individually and simultaneously

We hypothesized that pacing, which provided a rapid uniform contraction of the ventricles with a narrower QRS, would produce a better stroke volume and cardiac output (CO). We sought to study whether pacing simultaneously at two sites in the right ventricle (right ventricular apex and outflow tract) would provide a narrower QRS and improved CO in 11 patients undergoing elective electrophysiology studies. Patients were studied by transthoracic echocardiography measurement of CO using the Doppler flow velocity method in normal sinus rhythm, AOO pacing (rate 80), DOO pacing in the right ventricular apex (AV delay 100 ms), DOO pacing in the right ventricular outflow tract, and DOO pacing at both right ventricular sites simultaneously in random order. The COs were 5.42 +/- 1.83, 5.61 +/- 1.97, 5.67 +/- 1.6, 5.84 +/- 1.68, and 5.86 +/- 1.52 L/min, respectively (no significant difference by repeated measures analysis of variance [ANOVA]). The QRS durations were 0.09 +/- 0.02, 0.09 +/- 0.02, 0.13 +/- 0.027, 0.13 +/- 0.03, and 0.11 +/- 0.03 secs respectively. Repeated measures ANOVA showed that the QRS duration significantly increased with right ventricular apex or right ventricular outflow tract pacing compared to sinus rhythm and AOO pacing (P < 0.001) but then diminished with pacing at both sites (P < 0.01). QRS duration was not correlated with CO, however the change in QRS duration correlated significantly with the change in CO when pacing was performed at the two right ventricular sites simultaneously. In conclusion, during DOO pacing, there was a trend for pacing in the right ventricular outflow tract or both sites to improve the CO compared to the right ventricular apex. With simultaneous pacing at both ventricular sites, the QRS narrowed. Further studies will be required to see if this approach has value in patients with poor left ventricular function or congestive heart failure.

Influence of exercise induced myocardial ischemia on right ventricular dP/dt: potential implications for rate responsive pacing

BACKGROUND

Right ventricular (RV) dP/dtmax has been used as a simple parameter for rate responsive pacing to simulate the normal sinus node function. However, the effect of acute myocardial ischemia on RV dP/dtmax has not yet been evaluated.

METHODS

RV high fidelity pressure was measured in 21 patients at rest and during supine bicycle exercise. Nine patients (Group 1 = controls) had no or only minimal alterations of the coronary arteries and 12 (Group 2 = CAD) had significant coronary artery disease with exercise induced left ventricular (LV) wall-motion abnormalities (n = 10) and/or angina pectoris (n = 6). RV pressure and its first derivative (RV dP/dt) were determined by an 8 French micromanometer catheter. The time constant of RV pressure decay (Tau) was calculated from the negative reciprocal of RV pressure versus negative dP/dt during isovolumic relaxation. RV volumes and ejection fraction were calculated from RV biplane angiograms (multiple slice method) at rest and during exercise.

RESULTS

Heart rate (HR), RV dP/dtmax and dP/dtmin increased significantly during exercise, whereas Tau decreased. There were no significant differences between the two groups, although RV ejection fraction increased from 67% to 72% in the control group but decreased from 63% to 51% in the CAD group (P < 0.05). An exponential relationship was found between HR and dP/dtmax with a correlation coefficient of 0.82 (P < 0.01; SEE = 7% of the mean value).

CONCLUSIONS

Acute exercise induced myocardial ischemia does not significantly influence RV dP/dtmax during sinus rhythm. Consequently, this index of RV contractility may be used in patients with coronary artery disease as a simple parameter for rate responsive pacing.

Hemodynamic importance of preserving the normal sequence of ventricular activation in permanent cardiac pacing

Pacing the right ventricle in the apex profoundly modifies the sequence of activation and thus the sequence of contraction and relaxation of the left ventricle. To evaluate the relative importance of preserving normal ventricular activation sequence and optimal atrioventricular (AV) synchrony in permanent pacing, we compared the effects of three pacing modes: AAI, preserving both normal AV synchrony and normal activation sequence; DDD, with complete ventricular capture that preserves only AV synchrony; and VVI, disrupting both, at rest and during exercise. Hemodynamic and radionuclide studies were performed in 11 patients who had normal intrinsic conduction and who were implanted on a long-term basis with a DDDR pacemaker for isolated sinus node dysfunction. AAI versus DDD and VVI significantly increased cardiac output at rest (6.6 +/- 1.3 L/min vs 6 +/- 0.9 L/min vs 5 +/- 1 L/min; p < 0.01) and during exercise (13.5 +/- 2 L/min vs 12.1 +/- 2.2 L/min vs 14.4 +/- 2.1 L/min; p < 0.01). Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was lowest with AAI (15.4 +/- 4.5 mm Hg), with an average reduction of 17% compared with DDD (19.6 +/- 5 mm Hg; p < 0.01) and of 30% compared with VVI (25.8 +/- 7 mm Hg; p < 0.01) during exercise. Identical benefits were observed for all other hemodynamic parameters: right atrial pressure, pulmonary artery pressure, left ventricular (LV) stroke work index, and systemic vascular resistances. LV ejection fraction was significantly higher in AAI than in DDD at rest (61% vs 58%, respectively; p < 0.05) and during exercise (65% vs 60%, respectively; p < 0.05). This improvement in LV systolic function resulted principally from the increase in septal ejection fraction. LV filling also was improved in AAI as demonstrated by a significant increase in peak filling rate at rest and during exercise. These data show the importance of preserving, whenever possible, not only normal AV synchrony but also normal ventricular activation sequence in permanent cardiac pacing.

Critical PQ interval for the appearance of diastolic mitral regurgitation and optimal PQ interval in patients implanted with DDD pacemakers

Diastolic mitral regurgitation (MR) may be induced by prolonging atrioventricular (AV) delay, and a significant negative correlation has been described between the critical PQ interval for the appearance of diastolic MR and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) in patients with DDD pacemakers. We report the relationship between the critical PQ interval for the appearance of diastolic MR and the optimal PQ interval in 11 patients (69.1 +/- 12.6 years). Cardiac output (CO) and PCWP were measured by Swan-Ganz catheter and transmitral blood flow was recorded by pulsed-Doppler echocardiography. AV delay was prolonged stepwise by 0.025 seconds starting from 0.065 seconds. The pacing rate was fixed at 70 beats/min. CO was highest when the PQ interval was 0.18 +/- 0.04 seconds. There was a significant positive correlation between the critical PQ interval for the appearance of diastolic MR and the PQ interval at which CO was the highest (r = 0.91, P < 0.01). The PQ interval at which CO was the highest was 0.02 +/- 0.02 seconds shorter than the critical PQ interval for the appearance of diastolic MR (P < 0.05). When the PQ interval was increased by 0.025 seconds from the critical PQ interval for the appearance of diastolic MR, CO decreased from 4.3 +/- 0.6 L/min to 4.1 +/- 0.6 L/min and PCWP increased from 7.5 +/- 6.4 mmHg to 8.5 +/- 7.3 mmHg (P < 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Comparison of ventricular function in atrial rate adaptive versus dual chamber rate adaptive pacing during exercise

The hemodynamic effects of two different pacing modes--rate adaptive atrial (AAIR) versus dual chamber (DDDR) pacing--were assessed in 12 patients with DDDR pacemakers during upright bicycle exercise first-pass radionuclide angiography using a multiwire gamma camera with tantalum-178 as a tracer. All patients had sinus node disease with intact AV conduction. Patients exercised to the same heart rate in random order in these two different pacing modes, AAIR and DDDR with AV delay (of 100 msec) selected to maintain 100% ventricular capture. Cardiac output increased significantly above baseline values during exercise in both pacing modes: 154 +/- 41% (mean +/- SEM, P = 0.002) with AAIR, versus 95 +/- 24% (P = 0.004) with DDDR (P = NS between the two modes). The peak filling rate, likewise, increased in both pacing modes (2.3 +/- 0.21 end-diastolic volumes/sec to 3.8 +/- 0.31 end-diastolic volumes/sec in AAIR [P = 0.0004] and 2.2 +/- 0.18 end-diastolic volumes/sec to 3.4 +/- 0.27 end-diastolic volumes/sec in DDDR [P = 0.0008]). LV ejection fraction was normal at rest (60 +/- 4%, SEM) and did not significantly change with submaximal exercise in either pacing mode (both 56%, P = NS). No significant changes in end-diastolic volume or stroke volume indexes occurred with exercise in either pacing mode. Our study demonstrates that in patients with normal resting LV function, AAIR and DDDR pacing are equally effective in attaining appropriate increases in cardiac output and LV filling during exercise.