Threshold and polarization properties of modern active fixation atrial leads

Pacemaker leads: performance and progress

Pacing leads remain the "weaker link" of the permanent pacing system. Lead failure has been an issue since the beginning of implantable pacemaker therapy. Modern electronics have brought about considerable progress in pacing technology, but lead design has been slower to evolve and problems persist. IS-1 standardization must be considered a significant advance, but some issues regarding IS-1 standardization persist and have been the cause of some compatibility problems. With respect to lead insulation, silicone has proved to offer total reliability for > 30 years. In the search for better handling characteristics, polyurethane 80A was employed for bipolar leads, but it failed to demonstrate satisfactory insulating properties. New insulation materials, such as ethylene-fluoro-ethylene (ETFE), and coated wire technology look promising, having shown 99.32% survival at 5-year follow-up. Reliability is the main objective in lead design, but leads should provide low battery consumption as well. Low coil resistance, with high electrode impedance in steroid-eluting leads, is the standard at present. Low polarization is a desirable property for 2 main reasons: (1) in conjunction with low-threshold leads, it decreases battery consumption; and (2) it allows capture detection and, therefore, safer pacing at low battery consumption. Lead tip design as well as pacing pulse configuration can influence polarization.

A new steroid-eluting screw-in electrode

A new lead design was tested that combined a small microporous steroid-eluting electrode with an insulated, exposed helix for active fixation. This lead (model 5078, Medtronic, Inc., group I, n = 10) was compared to a conventional model (model Y 60 BP, Biotronik) with a larger surface of polished platinum-iridium, equipped with a fixed, noninsulated screw but without steroid elution (group II, n = 10). The two lead models were studied in the atrial position of dual chamber pacing systems, which all had a tined ventricular lead (model 5024, Medtronic, Inc.), with essentially the same steroid-eluting tip as the new active fixation lead design. Sensing and pacing data were recorded acutely and during 1 year of follow-up, via the telemetry of a Relay pulse generator (Intermedics, Inc.). Intraoperatively, unfiltered atrial electrogram amplitudes did not differ between groups (group I: 7.12 +/- 2.56 mV vs group II: 6.42 +/- 1.87 mV; P > 0.05), nor did sensing thresholds 1 year after implantation (group I: 5.33 +/- 1.70 mV vs group II: 4.26 +/- 1.40 mV; P > 0.05). Atrial pacing thresholds as measured during surgery at a pulse width of 0.5 msec were lower in group I (0.49 +/- 0.15 V) than in group II (0.68 +/- 0.19 V; P < 0.05). From day 5 through day 360 of follow-up, the difference in atrial pacing thresholds was highly significant (P < 0.01), with a smaller peaking of early thresholds and a much lower scattering of data for the steroid screw-in leads than for controls.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)