Effect of steroid eluting versus conventional electrodes on propafenone induced rise in chronic ventricular pacing threshold

Effects of coronary artery disease in patients with permanent left bundle branch area pacing: A retrospective study

Aims

Myocardial ischemia can affect traditional right ventricular (RV) pacing parameters, but it is unclear whether coronary artery disease (CAD) impact the pacing parameters and electrophysiological characteristics of left bundle branch area pacing (LBBaP) as a physiological pacing representative.

Methods

Patients who underwent coronary angiography (CAG) after/before the LBBaP procedure and underwent percutaneous coronary intervention after LBBaP procedure were divided into CAD group and Non-CAD group according to visual CAG. Pacing parameters and electrophysiological characteristics were recorded at LBBaP implantation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was implemented to evaluate the association between CAD and higher capture threshold. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to verify result stability.

Results

A total of 176 patients met inclusion criteria (115 Non-CAD patients and 61 CAD patients) with a mean age of 71.1 ± 9.0 years. Compared with the Non-CAD patients, CAD patients had the higher capture threshold (0.67 ± 0.22 V vs. 0.82 ± 0.28 V, P < 0.001) and lower R-wave amplitude (12.5 ± 4.8 mV vs. 10.1 ± 2.7 mV, P = 0.001). Moreover, CAD was independently associated with higher capture threshold (adjusted Odds ratio (OR) 3.418, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.621-7.206, P = 0.001), which was further validated through sensitivity analyses.

Conclusion

Patients without CAD might have safer pacing parameters in the LBBaP procedure. Besides, CAD might be the risk factor of capture threshold increase during permanent LBBaP implantation.

Effects of Rhythm and Rate-Controlling Drugs in Patients With Permanent His-Bundle Pacing

Introduction: Antiarrhythmic drug therapy can affect pacemaker parameters in both the atrial and ventricular myocardium. It is not known whether antiarrhythmic drugs impact His bundle pacing/sensing parameters and His to ventricle (H-V) intervals following permanent His bundle pacing (HBP). The aims of the study were to prospectively determine the influence of rhythm and rate-controlling drugs on pacing parameters and H-V conduction after His bundle lead implantation and to assess the impact of rhythm and rate-controlling drugs on the safety of HBP.

Materials and Methods: Patients (N = 140) with QRS duration < 120 ms who met permanent pacing indications were prospectively enrolled. Propafenone, lidocaine, and adenosine were injected intravenously after implantation of 3,830 lead during the procedure. Metoprolol succinate, amiodarone, and digoxin were taken orally for 1 month. Pacing parameters before and after drug intervention was measured, including His capture threshold, sensing and impedance, H-V interval, and conduction.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences in His bundle pacing thresholds, impedance, and sensing after drug intervention at implantation or during a 2-month follow-up (P > 0.05). The HV interval was not affected except in the large-dose propafenone group where HV interval prolonged (P = 0.001). All patients maintained 1:1 H-V conduction following drug administration.

Conclusion: There was no adverse impact on the HBP parameters or H-V conduction after the administration of commonly used dosage of rhythm and rate-controlling drugs. The drugs were safe in patients with permanent His bundle pacing.

The electrode-tissue interface: the revolutionary role of steroid-elution

The electrode-tissue interface is that area lying between the cathode of a low-voltage implantable pacemaker or cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) lead and the endocardium or epi-myocardium of the cardiac chamber being paced. The electrical stimulus that is delivered to this interface is responsible for myocyte depolarization with consequent cardiac contraction. The process by which this occurs is reasonably well understood and any explanation requires a basic understanding of the physics and cellular electrophysiology of pacing. The effective and efficient delivery of electrical energy to the myocardium via the lead is dependent on many factors to be discussed in this review. However, despite numerous evolutionary changes occurring in the cathode's material, design, and surface configuration, it was not until the incorporation of steroid-elution to the electrode-tissue interface that reliable and significantly low stimulation threshold cardiac pacing became possible.

Effectiveness of ibutilide in cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation in patients with dual chamber stimulation

AIM OF THE STUDY

To evaluate the effectiveness of Ibutilide in cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation in patients with sinus node disease wearing a dual chamber pacemaker and to assess the potential role of overdrive ventricular pacing in prevention of drug related proarrhythmia.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Fifty-three sinus node disease patients (35 males; mean age 75 +/- 9.5 years), implanted with a dual chamber pacing system, with persistent atrial fibrillation, lasting for 328 +/- 416 days, received 1-2 mg of intravenous Ibutilide. Pacing mode was programmed in VVI at 90 ppm, in order to suppress spontaneous ventricular activity. All patients were monitored for 4 hours. Late occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias was evaluated using the pacemaker memory. Ventricular pacing threshold, spontaneous electrogram amplitude and pacing impedance were measured before and after Ibutilide infusion. Cardioversion to sinus rhythm occurred in twenty-two patients (41.5%). Treatment success was significantly related to shorter atrial fibrillation duration. Paced QT interval duration increased from 412 +/- 36 ms to 481 +/- 40 ms (p < 0.0001), without differences between responders and non responders; QRS width did not change significantly (from 152 +/- 25 ms to 161 +/- 25 ms; p = n.s.). No early or late episodes of sustained or non sustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardia were observed. Pacing and sensing threshold did not show any significant variation.

CONCLUSIONS

Ibutilide showed a good effectiveness in treating persistent atrial fibrillation in paced patients. Overdrive ventricular pacing may have played a role in preventing drug induced ventricular proarrhythmia. No adverse effect on pacing threshold was observed.

Influence of acute exposure to high altitude and hypoxemia on ventricular stimulation thresholds in pacemaker patients

Cardiac stimulation threshold of implanted pacemakers may be influenced by a variety of endogenous and exogenous factors. High altitude provokes hypoxemia, which may change stimulation thresholds, besides causing other important physiological changes. The aim of our study was to investigate the influence of high altitude on ventricular stimulation thresholds in pacemaker patients. Thirteen patients (10 men; aged 65.5 +/- 4.8 years) with implanted single chamber pacemakers (nine with Pacesetter Regency SR+ with the Autocapture feature) were exposed to an altitude of 4,000 m above sea level, as simulated in a hypobaric chamber. Stepwise ascension was performed with a speed of 5 m/s starting at 450 m above sea level. A 5-minute rest was performed every 500 m to measure stimulation threshold at each step. After a stay of 30 minutes at 4,000 m stimulation threshold was measured, followed by a stepwise descent. Pacemaker interrogation and arterial blood gas analysis were performed at 450 and at 4,000 m, and a strength-duration curve was determined. Blood pressure, heart rate, and oxygen saturation were monitored continuously during the study. Ascent to 4,000 m above sea level induced a significant decrease in arterial pO2 (10.7 +/- 1.1 vs 5.5 +/- 0.3 kPa), pCO2 (5.3 +/- 0.3 vs 4.7 +/- 0.4 kPa), oxygen saturation measured by arterial blood gas analysis (95.5% +/- 1.2% vs 79.1% +/- 2.5%), and increase in pH (7.39 +/- 0.02 vs 7.45 +/- 0.04) (P < 0.0001). Stimulation thresholds and the strength-duration curve remained unchanged in all patients throughout the study. In conclusion, exposure to an altitude of 4,000 m above sea level with resultant hypobaric hypoxemia has no impact on ventricular stimulation thresholds. Therefore, in regard to the safety of pacing, pacemaker patients can safely be exposed to this altitude.

Combining antiarrhythmic drugs and implantable devices therapy: benefits and outcome

At least 50% of patients who received an ICD have been treated with antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD). The potential indications for combining antiarrhythmic drugs and ICD are generally the following: reduction of the number of episodes of ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation and therefore of the number of shocks, improving patient's quality of life and extending the battery life of the ICD, prevention of supraventricular arrhythmias and/or control of their rate, lengthening of the tachycardia cycle length to allow ventricular tachycardia conversion by antitachycardia pacing and reduction of the number of episodes of syncope. Although previous papers reported conflicting results about pharmacologic therapy in reducing the frequency of iCD shocks, some recent randomized prospective studies showed the efficacy of pharmacologic therapy in reducing the frequency of ICD shocks. The use of antiarrhythmic drugs can have also adverse effect: an increase in the defibrillation threshold, an increase in the pacing threshold and an increase in the VT cycle length leading to detection failure. We have also to consider that some advantages derived from antiarrhythmic drugs can be reached by the new devices with atrial sensing and pacing and/or the possibility of atrial defibrillation or by using catheter ablation as adjunctive therapy to ICD. For these reasons, the concomitant use of antiarrhythmic drugs and ICD should be evaluated in each patient in relation to specific clinical and electrophysiologic features including: the frequency, the rate and the clinical presentation of the ventricular arrhythmia, the effect of the selected drug on the defibrillation threshold, the defibrillation threshold at the implant, the effect of the selected drug on the ventricular function and the likelihood of proarrhythmic events.

Steroid-eluting electrodes prevent chronic pacing threshold rise in the atrial chamber after oral propafenone administration

The aim of the study was to evaluate chronic atrial pacing threshold increase after oral propafenone therapy. Fifty patients affected by advanced AV block and sick sinus syndrome were studied at least 6 months after pacemaker implantation, before and after oral propafenone therapy (450-900 mg/day based on body weight). The patients were subdivided into three groups as to the type of electrode implanted, all three unipolar: group I (20 patients) Medtronic CapSure 4003, group II (13 patients) Medtronic Target Tip 4011, group III (17 patients) Medtronic 4057 screw-in leads. In all cases, Medtronic unipolar pacemakers were implanted with the same noninvasive autothreshold measurement method. Propafenone and 5-OH-propafenone blood levels were measured 3-5 hours after drug administration. The packing autothreshold was measured at 0.8, 1.6, and 2.5 V by reducing the pulse width. After propafenone, groups II and III showed a statistically significant threshold rise (P ranging from < 0.01 to 0.05), whereas no significant difference was found in group I. Propafenone and 5-OH-propafenone blood vessels did not show any significant difference among the three groups. Strength-duration curves were drawn for the three groups before and after propafenone: at baseline the curves shifted to the left with the steep part above the knee, clearly favoring CapSure over the other two groups. After propafenone, the curves shifted to the right, with the flat par progressively more evident in groups II and III. In the atrial chamber, steroid-eluting leads prevented threshold increase after propafenone therapy, in contrast with a significant threshold rise with conventional porous and screw-in leads.

An unusual cause of high threshold values at pacemaker implantation

An 81-year old man with third-degree AV block and weakness underwent an unsuccessful attempt to DDD pacemaker implant caused by hypothyroidism. Administration of thyroxin until he was euthyroid permitted implantation with normal stimulation thresholds.