Initial experience with intracardiac atrial defibrillation in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation

Role of Intracardiac Defibrillation During the Ablation Procedure as a Predictor of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Catheter Ablation

Intracardiac defibrillation (IDF) is performed to restore sinus rhythm (SR) during radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to investigate the change in the IDF threshold before and after RFCA during the ablation procedure and determine whether the IDF threshold after RFCA was associated with the AF substrate and AF recurrence. A total of 141 consecutive patients with drug-refractory persistent AF (age 62.5 ± 10.3 years, 84.4% male) were enrolled in this study. Before RFCA, we initially performed IDF with an output of 1 J. When IDF failed to restore SR, the output was gradually increased to 30 J. After RFCA, we attempted pacing-induced AF to provoke other focuses of AF. When AF was induced, we performed IDF again to terminate AF with outputs of 1 to 30 J. The change in the IDF threshold to restore SR before and after RFCA was evaluated. After RFCA, the IDF threshold for restoring SR significantly decreased (from 11.5 ± 8.6 J to 4.0 ± 3.8 J, P < 0.001). During the follow-up (24.3 ± 12.2 months), SR was maintained in 107 patients (75.9%). The multivariate analysis using a Cox proportional-hazards model revealed that an IDF threshold of > 5 J after RFCA was significantly associated with the AF recurrence (HR, 3.99; 95% confidence interval 1.93-8.22; P = 0.0001). RFCA decreased the IDF threshold for restoring SR in patients with persistent AF. The IDF output of > 5 J after RFCA could be a predictor of AF recurrence independent of the AF substrate.

Waveform optimization for internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

A novel atrial defibrillator was developed at the Royal Victoria Hospital in collaboration with the Nanotechnology and Integrated Bio-Engineering Centre, University of Ulster. This device is powered by an external pulse of radiofrequency energy and designed to cardiovert using low-tilt monophasic waveform (LTMW) and low-tilt biphasic waveform (LTBW), 12 milliseconds pulse width. This study compared the safety and efficacy of LTMW with LTBW for transvenous cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

Patients were anticoagulated with warfarin to maintain International Normalized Ratio between 2 and 3 for 4 weeks prior cardioversion. Warfarin international normalized ratio level was maintained in between 2 and 3 for 4 weeks prior cardioversion. St Jude's defibrillating catheter was positioned in the distal coronary sinus and right atrium and connected to the defibrillator via a junction box. After a test shock using a dummy load, the patient was cardioverted in a step-up progression from 50 to 300 V. Shock success was defined as return of sinus rhythm for 30 seconds or more. If cardioversion was unsuccessful at peak voltage, the patient was crossed over to the other arm of the waveform type and cardioverted at peak voltage.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were randomized equally to LTBW and LTMW (15 each). Seven out of 15 patients (46%) cardioverted to sinus rhythm with LTBW, and 1 (6%) of 15, with LTMW (P = .035). Including crossover patients, 14 patients (46%) converted to sinus rhythm. After crossover, 4 patients were cardioverted with LTBW and 2 with LTMW. Overall mean voltage, current, and energy used for cardioversion were 270.53 ± 35.96 V, 3.68 ± 0.80 A, and 9.12 ± 3.73 J, respectively, and intracardiac impedance was 70.82 ± 13.46 Ω. For patients who were successfully cardioverted, mean voltage, current, energy, and intracardiac impedance were 268.28 ± 42.41 V, 3.52 ± 0.63 A, 8.51 ± 3.16 J, and 73.92 ± 12.01 Ω. There were no major adverse complications during the study. Cardiac markers measured postcardioversion were unremarkable.

CONCLUSION

Low-tilt biphasic waveform was more efficacious for low-energy transvenous cardioversion of AF. A significant proportion of patients were successfully cardioverted to sinus rhythm with low energy. Radiofrequency-powered defibrillation can be safely used for transvenous cardioversion of AF.

Termination of atrial fibrillation using pulsed low-energy far-field stimulation

BACKGROUND

Electrically based therapies for terminating atrial fibrillation (AF) currently fall into 2 categories: antitachycardia pacing and cardioversion. Antitachycardia pacing uses low-intensity pacing stimuli delivered via a single electrode and is effective for terminating slower tachycardias but is less effective for treating AF. In contrast, cardioversion uses a single high-voltage shock to terminate AF reliably, but the voltages required produce undesirable side effects, including tissue damage and pain. We propose a new method to terminate AF called far-field antifibrillation pacing, which delivers a short train of low-intensity electric pulses at the frequency of antitachycardia pacing but from field electrodes. Prior theoretical work has suggested that this approach can create a large number of activation sites ("virtual" electrodes) that emit propagating waves within the tissue without implanting physical electrodes and thereby may be more effective than point-source stimulation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using optical mapping in isolated perfused canine atrial preparations, we show that a series of pulses at low field strength (0.9 to 1.4 V/cm) is sufficient to entrain and subsequently extinguish AF with a success rate of 93% (69 of 74 trials in 8 preparations). We further demonstrate that the mechanism behind far-field antifibrillation pacing success is the generation of wave emission sites within the tissue by the applied electric field, which entrains the tissue as the field is pulsed.

CONCLUSIONS

AF in our model can be terminated by far-field antifibrillation pacing with only 13% of the energy required for cardioversion. Further studies are needed to determine whether this marked reduction in energy can increase the effectiveness and safety of terminating atrial tachyarrhythmias clinically.

Outpatient oesophageal-precordial electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: an effective and safe technique to restore sinus rhythm

OBJECTIVE

External electrical cardioversion is commonly used in the management of atrial fibrillation (AF), but usually involves general anaesthesia. We tested the efficacy, safety and tolerability of a minimally invasive cardioversion technique, not requiring general anaesthesia, performed on an outpatient basis.

METHODS

We performed outpatient oesophageal cardioversion in 87 consecutive patients (mean age: 67.5 +/- 9.6 years; weight: 77.47 +/- 12.34 kg; left atrium diameter: 46.25 +/- 6.85 mm; LVEF: 55.5 +/- 16%) with persistent AF (mean duration: 6.99 +/- 11.55 months). A biphasic shock was delivered via an oesophageal decapolar lead (cathode) and two precordial patches (anode) under a mild sedation (midazolam 2.5-5 mg). In the first 25 patients, a step-up protocol (from 10 to 100 J) was performed whereas, in the other 62, a first shock at 50 J and a second one at 100 J, were delivered.

RESULTS

Patients described the level of discomfort caused by the procedure according a five-grade scale. Cardioversion was achieved in 97.7% of patients using a mean effective energy of 51.2 +/- 15.7 J. In 88.5% of patients, sinus rhythm was restored by using 50 J or less. No complications occurred and no patient required hospital admission. Mean discomfort score was 1.56 +/- 0.74 out of 5. Sinus rhythm persisted in 62.6% of patients at the 1-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Outpatient oesophageal cardioversion is a safe, acceptable and effective way to cardiovert patients with AF. It may be a useful alternative to external cardioversion. A relatively high starting energy (50 J) was demonstrated to be superior to a low-energy step-up technique.

Electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: different methods for a safe and effective technique

Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia observed in clinical practice. Many different therapeutic approaches are available at present but none may be considered the gold standard treatment. Antiarrhythmic drugs are not very effective agents to cardiovert persistent atrial fibrillation and, therefore, the technique most frequently used to restore sinus rhythm is external direct current cardioversion, which has proved to be safe and very effective. Esophageal cardioversion is an alternative method that could obviate some of the limitations of the external technique, such as the high energy required, need for anesthesia and longer hospital stay. Another technique performed during the last two decades is internal cardioversion, but at present, the advantage of this technique is limited to the small proportion of cases of unsuccessful external cardioversion.

Internal defibrillation: where we have been and where we should be going?

Internal cardioversion has been developed as an alternative technique for patients who are resistant to external DC cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) and was found to be associated with higher success rates. It used initially high energies (200-300 J) delivered between an intracardiac catheter and a backplate. Subsequent studies have shown that it is possible to terminate with energies of 1 to 6 Joules, paroxysmal or induced AF in 90 percent of patients and persistent AF in 75 percent of patients, using biphasic shocks delivered between a right atrium-coronary sinus vectors. Consequently, internal atrial defibrillation can be performed under sedation only without the need for general anesthesia. Recently developed external defibrillators, capable of delivering biphasic shocks, have increased the success rates of external cardioversion and reduced the need for internal cardioversion. However, internal defibrillation is still useful in overweight or obese patients, in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma who are more difficult to defibrillate, and in patients with implanted devices which may be injured by high energy shocks. Low energy internal defibrillation has also proven to be safe and this has prompted the development of implantable devices for terminating AF. The first device used was the Metrix system, a stand-alone atrial defibrillator (without ventricular defibrillation) which was found to be safe and effective in selected groups of patients. Unfortunately, this device is no longer being marketed. Only double chamber defibrillators with pacing capabilities are presently available: the Medtronic GEM III AT, an updated version of the Jewel AF and the Guidant PRIZM AVT. These devices can be patient-activated or programmed to deliver automatically ounce atrial tachyarrhythmias are detected, therapies including pacing or/and shocks. Attempts to define the group of patients who might benefit from these devices are described but the respective role of atrial defibrillators versus other non-pharmacologic therapies for AF, such as surgery and radiofrequency catheter ablation, remains to be determined. Advantages and limitations or atrial defibrillators and approaches to reduce shock related discomfort which may be a concern in some patients, are reviewed. Studies have shown that despite shock discomfort, quality of life was improved in patients with atrial defibrillators and the need for repeated hospitalizations was reduced. The cost of these devices remains a concern for the treatment of a non-lethal arrhythmia. Attention that atrial defibrillators will receive from cardiologists and from the industry in the future, will depend of the long-term results of other non-pharmacological options and of the identification of the group of AF patients which will require restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm. But there is no doubt that selected subsets of patients with AF could benefit from atrial defibrillation.

Internal Atrial and Ventricular Defibrillation During Electrophysiology Procedures

Over the last twenty years internal defibrillation has evolved from an experimental technique into an important adjunctive procedure in the electrophysiology laboratory. Internal deflbrillation is used for treating persistent atrial fibrillation and refractory ventricular arrhythmias. Atrial defibrillation can be performed with several electrode configurations but generally shocks from 1 to 50 joules are delivered between electrodes placed in the coronary sinus and lateral wall of the right atrium. Ventricular defibrillation is usually performed with electrodes in the right ventricle and superior vena cava, although "unipolar" configurations with an internal ventricular electrode and a skin electrode can be used. Currently, internal deflbrillation can be required in 5-10% of cases within the electrophysiology laboratory and will become more commonly used as electrophysiologists perform more complex catheter ablation procedures.

Novel passive implantable atrial defibrillator using transcutaneous radiofrequency energy transmission successfully cardioverts atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Conventional methods for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) to sinus rhythm have numerous difficulties. A novel method for cardioversion using the passive implantable atrial defibrillator (PIAD) was tested in acute animal models. This device does not have a battery or a capacitor to store energy and is activated by transferring RF energy across the skin from an external transmitter to the subcutaneously implanted defibrillator. On activation, a novel monophasic shock waveform with 5% tilt is delivered to the heart via 2 intracardiac defibrillation leads.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Cardioversion attempts with the device were assessed in 2 phases: a feasibility and efficacy study and randomized comparison against standard waveforms. Defibrillation leads were placed transvenously into the distal coronary sinus and the right atrial appendage. These were connected to the subcutaneously implanted PIAD. Sustained AF was induced by rapid atrial pacing. The transmitter coil was placed on the skin overlying the defibrillator, and defibrillation synchronized to the R wave was attempted. The method was found to be efficacious at very low voltage and energy, with 100% cardioversion success observed for 10-ms 100-V shocks (mean energy, 1.54+/-0.02 J). The PIAD waveform had a higher cardioversion success rate than a truncated, 70% tilt monophasic exponential pulse (100 V, 100% versus 78.0+/-7.57%; P=0.001). There were no postshock complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering these animal results, this method is promising for cardioverting AF in symptomatic patients.

Automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

Ventricular fibrillation, a loss of synchronous electrical activity in the heart which leads to hemodynamic collapse, is a leading cause of death. Because of the devastating personal and societal effects of this phenomenon, the automatic cardioverter-defibrillator has been developed for automatic detection and termination of the arrhythmia and is in widespread clinical use. Advances in circuits, leads, waveforms, and signal processing along with increased knowledge of the mechanisms of fibrillation have led to continuing improvements in this device, extending its use to many patients. A device has also been developed for the automatic or semiautomatic treatment of atrial fibrillation, an arrhythmia less life-threatening than ventricular fibrillation, but still a serious health problem. Continued improvement of these devices and the development of qualitatively new approaches hold great promise for exciting therapeutic advances in this area.

Atrial mechanical performance after internal and external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: an echocardiographic study

OBJECTIVES

To compare the time course of resumption of mechanical performance of the left and right atrium after the novel method of internal low-energy cardioversion (CV) and conventional external CV of atrial fibrillation (AF).

BACKGROUND

Right atrial performance has been shown to normalize before the left atrium after external CV. However, no data on atrial function after internal CV are available.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS

Sixty-three patients with chronic AF were randomized to participate in either external or internal CV.

MEASUREMENTS

Echocardiographic examinations were carried out before as well as immediately after CV (day 0), and at days 1, 7, and 28 thereafter for the determination of cardiac dimensions, volumes, and transvalvular flow patterns.

RESULTS

After randomized internal CV or external CV, stable sinus rhythm was restored in 59 patients. Irrespective of the mode of CV, the right atrium resumed its mechanical function immediately after CV, whereas the left atrium was stunned beyond day 7. The mode of CV, internal or external, had no influence on the recovery of atrial mechanical function.

CONCLUSIONS

The right atrium resumes its normal function immediately after internal as well as external CV, whereas left atrium function is delayed. In contrast to the assumption that low-energy internal CV would impact less on atrial mechanical recovery, the type of method of CV used has no effect on such recovery.

Safety and efficacy of low-energy cardioversion of 500 patients using two different techniques

AIM

To present some safety and efficacy issues of low-energy internal cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation from 500 consecutive procedures performed with two different techniques, using either two single-coil catheters, or a single twin-coil catheter.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Low-energy internal cardioversion was carried out in 368 patients by means of two defibrillation catheters: the former was positioned in the right atrium and the latter either in the left pulmonary artery (212 patients), or in the distal coronary sinus (156 patients). In the remaining 132 patients, a single twin-coil catheter was positioned with the distal coil either in the pulmonary artery (75 patients) or in the coronary sinus (57 patients), while the proximal coil was in the right atrium. The external defibrillator delivered truncated biphasic shocks (6/6 ms, tilt 50%), with a voltage of 10-400 V. In 283 patients (57%) external cardioversion had been unsuccessfully tried before low-energy internal cardioversion. After a total of 1118 shocks, the overall success rate was 92.2% (91.3% with two catheters and 94.7% with the single catheter); the success rate was 93.4 and 91.3% with the coronary sinus and the pulmonary artery approach, respectively. The mean energy used was 6.5 +/- 3.4 J (voltage: 320 +/- 45 V); no difference was found between the twin catheter (6.3 +/- 3.1 J) and the single catheter approach (6.9 +/- 3.7 J), while the coronary sinus configuration required a significantly lower energy than the pulmonary artery configuration (5.6 +/- 2.9 vs 7.2 +/- 3.8 J, P < 0.05). The duration of the current atrial fibrillation episode was the only clinical characteristic statistically different between the 461 successfully cardioverted patients and the 39 failures (295 vs 727 days, P < 0.01). No complication was recorded during or after the delivery of the therapy; no procedure had to be terminated because of patient's intolerance.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-energy internal cardioversion is a safe and effective procedure for converting chronic atrial fibrillation, confirmed by this large multicentre experience. The newly available twin-coil catheter seems to achieve a slightly better success rate compared with the traditional two-catheter technique, and is associated with the same safety profile.

Prevalence and significance of focal sources of atrial arrhythmia in patients undergoing cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

Recent reports have high-lighted the importance of focal atrial arrhythmias as a curable cause for a group of patients with frequently recurrent paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). The importance of this arrhythmia mechanism in the general population of patients with persistent AF is unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

After successful internal cardioversion of 50 consecutive patients with persistent AF (mean age 60 years, mean duration of AF 26 months), endocardial activity in the immediate postcardioversion period was analyzed for the presence of focal atrial activity. Postcardioversion atrial arrhythmias were considered to be focal if there was evidence of a localized source of repetitive early atrial activation, either in the form of (1) self-terminating monomorphic atrial tachycardia (at least five beats) or (2) recurrences of AF with an initial atrial activation sequence (first five beats) that was both monomorphic and reproducible with repeated recurrences. Evidence for a focal atrial arrhythmia was present in 20 of the total group of 50 patients (40%). Multivariate analysis of clinical characteristics revealed the diagnosis of lone AF as the only independent predictor of a focal source of AF (P = 0.028). Thirty-nine patients were discharged from hospital in sinus rhythm. At 1-month follow-up, 25 (64%) of these 39 patients had suffered AF recurrence. The only significant predictor of AF recurrence was evidence of a focal source of atrial arrhythmia immediately after cardioversion, with a relative risk of 1.73 (range 1.1 to 2.7; P = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

Focal atrial arrhythmias are common in patients presenting with "idiopathic" persistent AF, suggesting a possible causative role in the generation of this common arrhythmia.

Higher energy synchronized external direct current cardioversion for refractory atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVES

We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of higher energy synchronized cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation refractory to standard energy direct current (DC) cardioversion.

BACKGROUND

Standard external electrical cardioversion fails to restore sinus rhythm in 5% to 30% of patients with atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

Patients with atrial fibrillation who failed to achieve sinus rhythm after at least two attempts at standard external cardioversion with 360 J were included in the study. Two external defibrillators, each connected to its own pair of R-2 patches in the anteroposterior position, were used to deliver a synchronized total of 720 J.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients underwent cardioversion with 720 J. Mean weight was 117 +/- 23 kg (body mass index 48.3 +/- 4.1 kg/m2). Structural heart disease was present in 76% of patients. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 45 +/- 12%. Atrial fibrillation was present for over three months in 55% of the patients. Sinus rhythm was achieved in 46 (84%) of the 55 patients. No major complications were observed. No patient developed hemodynamic compromise and no documented cerebrovascular accident occurred within one month after cardioversion. Of the 46 successful cardioversions, 18 patients (39%) remained in sinus rhythm over a mean follow-up of 2.1 months.

CONCLUSIONS

External higher energy cardioversion is effective in restoring sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation refractory to standard energy DC cardioversion. This method is safe and does not result in clinical evidence of myocardial impairment. It may be a useful alternative to internal cardioversion because it could be done within the same setting of the failed standard cardioversion and obviates the need to withhold protective anticoagulation for internal cardioversion.

Marked reduction in atrial defibrillation thresholds with repeated internal cardioversion

OBJECTIVES

This study was performed to assess the atrial defibrillation threshold in patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) using repeated internal cardioversion.

BACKGROUND

Previous studies in patients with chronic AF undergoing internal cardioversion have shown this method to be effective and safe. However, current energy requirements might preclude patients with longer-lasting AF from being eligible for an implantable atrial defibrillator.

METHODS

Internal shocks were delivered via defibrillation electrodes placed in the right atrium (cathode) and the coronary sinus (anode) or the right atrium (cathode) and the left pulmonary artery. After cardioversion, patients were orally treated with sotalol (mean 189 +/- 63 mg/day). Eighty consecutive patients with chronic AF (mean duration 291 +/- 237 days) underwent internal cardioversion, and sinus rhythm was restored in 74 patients. Eighteen patients underwent repeated internal cardioversion using the same electrode position and shock configuration after recurrence of AF (mean duration 34 +/- 25 days).

RESULTS

In these 18 patients, the overall mean defibrillation threshold was 6.67 +/- 3.09 J for the first cardioversion and 3.83 +/- 2.62 J for the second (p = 0.003). Mean lead impedance was 55.6 +/- 5.1 ohms and 57.1 +/- 3.7 ohms, respectively (not significant). For sedation, 6.7 +/- 2.9 mg and 3.9 +/- 2.2 mg midazolam were administered intravenously (p = 0.003), and the pain score (0 = not felt, 10 = intolerable) was 5.1 +/- 1.9 and 2.7 +/- 1.8 (p = 0.001). Uni- and multivariate analyses revealed only the duration of AF before cardioversion to be of relevance, lasting 175 +/- 113 days before the first and 34 +/- 25 days before the second cardioversion in these 18 patients (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

If the duration of AF is reduced, a significant reduction in defibrillation energy requirements for internal cardioversion ensues. This might extend the group of patients eligible for an implantable atrial defibrillator despite relatively high initial defibrillation thresholds.

Interactions of antiarrhythmic drugs with implantable defibrillator therapy for atrial and ventricular tachyarrhythmias

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) have proven highly successful in the treatment of recurrent ventricular and atrial arrhythmias. Despite their high efficacy in terminating arrhythmias, concomitant therapy with antiarrhythmic drugs in ICD recipients remains common. Antiarrhythmic drugs are employed in an attempt to to limit patient exposure to high-energy shocks, primarily by reducing the number of arrhythmia reccurrences, suppressing coexisting arrhythmias, affecting rate and organization of tachycardias, and increasing efficacy of painless pacing therapies. Data regarding interaction of antiarrhythmic drugs with ICDs are incomplete and mostly based on animal models; however, it is clear that antiarrhythmic drugs affect all aspects of function of devices such as defibrillation threshold, pacing threshold, and sensing of both atrial and and ventricular arrhythmias. Because significant change in any of these functions may result in a nonfunctional device, and magnitude of drug effect in an individual patient is unpredictable, careful assessment of ICD function after an institution of therapy with antiarrhythmic drugs is mandatory.

Transvenous atrial defibrillation--techniques and clinical applications

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia requiring treatment. The most desirable therapy may be restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm. Limitations of the current methods for cardioversion of AF have prompted the development of transvenous atrial defibrillation (TADF) as an alternative and more effective technique for converting AF. Recent advances in the technique of TADF, particularly in the design and configuration of the electrodes, and the use of an optimal biphasic shock waveform have dramatically improved the efficacy of TADF for the termination of all types of AF. The reduction in voltage and energy requirements for cardioversion by TADF may allow the procedure to be performed with little or no sedation and the risk of general anesthesia may be avoided. Both experimental and clinical studies have demonstrated the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of using TADF as a new temporary or "permanent" mode of electrical therapy for AF. It has several potential applications, from acute termination of AF in the electrophysiology laboratory and in patients who have failed to respond to external cardioversion, to its use as an implantable device for treating recurrent AF. This article reviews the current technique and clinical applications of TADF for treatment of AF.

Limited internal shocks for atrial fibrillation refractory to external cardioversion

We investigated the feasibility and long-term results of low-energy internal defibrillation using a limited number of shocks in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation resistant to external cardioversion. A relatively high number of shocks of lower energy are usually required in those cases and can be poorly tolerated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-five patients with persistent atrial fibrillation underwent internal defibrillation, using biphasic R wave synchronous shocks between two catheters in the high right atrium and the coronary sinus. Conversion to sinus rhythm was obtained in all patients, with a median of two shocks. Early recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) occurred in eight cases (32%). Seven patients (41%) out of 17 discharged in sinus rhythm remained free of AF after a median follow-up of 8.9 months. Severe mitral insufficiency (P=0.05) and low left ventricle ejection fraction (P=0.002) were correlated with earlier recurrence. Amiodarone significantly favored (P=0.019) maintenance of sinus rhythm.

CONCLUSION

Internal defibrillation using a limited number of shocks equal to or less than 30 Joules is effective in terminating refractory atrial fibrillation and could be more acceptable for patients. However, the recurrence rate remains high, particularly in patients with severe mitral insufficiency or poor ventricular function. Amiodarone delays recurrences of atrial fibrillation.

Transvenous internal cardioversion for atrial fibrillation: a randomized study on defibrillation threshold and tolerability of asymmetrical compared with symmetrical shocks

The aim of the study was to compare, according to a randomized cross-over design, two different biphasic waveforms (6.5/2.5 ms and 3.0/3.0 ms phases duration, respectively) for low energy internal atrial cardioversion with regard to energy requirements for cardioversion and shock induced discomfort.

METHODS

Nineteen patients with chronic persistent atrial fibrillation (AF)(mean duration 16+/-20 months) were submitted to internal atrial cardioversion (shock delivery between catheters in right atrium and coronary sinus, respectively) and were randomly allocated to baseline cardioversion with an asymmetrical biphasic shock (6.5/2.5 ms) or with a symmetrical biphasic shock (3.0/3.0 ms), according to a step up protocol. After baseline cardioversion, a sustained AF was reinduced and the patients crossed to the alternative waveform. The procedure was performed without routine administration of sedatives and shock induced discomfort was monitored by a subjective score (1 to 5). Sedatives or anesthetics were administered at patient's request.

RESULTS

The procedure was effective in all the patients and was performed without need for sedatives/anesthetics in 17/19 patients (89%). Leading edge voltage of effective shocks resulted lower for asymmetrical shocks compared to symmetrical shocks (290+/-76 vs. 337+/-104 V, P<0.001) with no statistically significant differences in delivered energy (7.74+/-4.25 vs. 8.65+/-5.94 J). Moreover shock induced discomfort resulted lower for asymmetrical shocks compared to symmetrical (pain score=4.18+/-0.73 vs. 4.59+/-0.62, P<0.02). Shock impedence of effective shocks was 59+/-10 ohms for both waveforms. No significant complications occurred during the procedure and no ventricular arrhythmia was observed after atrial cardioversion. Transient bradycardia requiring support ventricular pacing was observed in one patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Delivery of biphasic asymmetrical shocks (6.5/2.5 ms) results in lower leading edge voltage of effective shocks and better patients tolerability compared with conventional biphasic symmetrical shocks (3.0/3.0 ms). These findings are of interest both for transvenous internal cardioversion of chronic persistent AF and for implantable atrial defibrillators.

Incidence and modes of onset of early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation after successful internal cardioversion, and its prevention by intravenous sotalol

OBJECTIVES

To study the incidence and mode of onset of early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation (ERAF) following successful internal cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation, and to determine the effects of sotalol in the prevention of ERAF.

DESIGN

The incidence and modes of onset of ERAF and the acute effects of intravenous sotalol in the prevention of ERAF were studied retrospectively.

SETTING

Electrophysiology laboratory at a university teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

64 patients, mean (SD) age 62 (10) years, who underwent internal cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation (mean duration of atrial fibrillation 31 (39) months).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

ECGs and intracardiac electrograms recorded during the internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation using 3/3 ms biphasic, R wave synchronised shocks.

RESULTS

52 patients (81%) had successful electrical cardioversion, and 20 (31%) of these had ERAF during the procedure. There was no clinical predictor for the occurrence of ERAF. Fifty eight episodes of ERAF were observed. Five ERAF episodes (9%) had preceding bradycardia and 53 (91%) of these were triggered by atrial premature beats with normal preceding heart rate. Atrial premature beats that reinitiated atrial fibrillation had a shorter coupling interval (333 (43) ms v 396 (100), p < 0.001) and a lower prematurity index (0.44 (0.11) v 0. 55 (0.14), p < 0.001) than those that did not reinitiate atrial fibrillation. Repeated shock delivery and increasing the defibrillation energy did not prevent ERAF. Intravenous sotalol infusion decreased the numbers of atrial premature beats and prolonged their coupling interval, and prevented ERAF after repeated defibrillation in 83% of patients with ERAF.

CONCLUSIONS

ERAF is a significant clinical problem after successful internal cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation, and was observed in up to 31% of patients. In most episodes, ERAF was triggered by short coupling atrial premature beats with preceding normal heart rate. Intravenous sotalol was effective in preventing ERAF in most cases.

Atrial defibrillation with a transvenous lead: a randomized comparison of active can shocking pathways

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to compare transvenous atrial defibrillation thresholds with lead configurations consisting of an active left pectoral electrode and either single or dual transvenous coils.

BACKGROUND

Low atrial defibrillation thresholds are achieved using complex lead systems including coils in the coronary sinus. However, the efficacy of more simple ventricular defibrillation leads with active pectoral pulse generators to defibrillate atrial fibrillation (AF) is unknown.

METHODS

This study was a prospective, randomized assessment of shock configuration on atrial defibrillation thresholds in 32 patients. The lead system was a dual coil Endotak DSP lead with a left pectoral pulse generator emulator. Shocks were delivered either between the right ventricular coil and an active can in common with the proximal atrial coil (triad) or between the atrial coil and active can (transatrial).

RESULTS

Delivered energy at defibrillation threshold was 7.1 +/- 6.0 J in the transatrial configuration and 4.0 +/- 4.2 J in the triad configuration (p < 0.005). Moreover, a low threshold (< or = 3 J) was observed in 69% of subjects in the triad configuration but only 47% in the transatrial configuration. Peak voltage and shock impedance were also lowered significantly in the triad configuration. Left atrial size was the only clinical predictor of the defibrillation threshold (r = 0.57, p < 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that low atrial defibrillation thresholds can be achieved using a single-pass transvenous ventricular defibrillation lead with a conventional ventricular defibrillation pathway. These data support the development of the combined atrial and ventricular defibrillator system.

Can early timed internal atrial defibrillation shocks reduce the atrial defibrillation threshold?

The defibrillation threshold is markedly reduced very early following the initiation of ventricular fibrillation. The purpose of this study was to determine if the same finding holds true for atrial defibrillation. Sustained, reproducible AF was induced with programmed atrial pacing using acetyl-beta-methylcholine chloride (40-640 microL/min) in six adult sheep (heart weight 245-300 g). Seven timing intervals (125 ms, 200 ms, 1 s, 3 s, 10 s, 30 s, and 5 min after AF induction) and two lead configurations: (1) RA as cathode and CS as anode; and (2) RA as cathode and RV apex as anode were tested. Single capacitor biphasic waveforms (3/1 ms) were delivered and atrial defibrillation thresholds (ADFTs) were determined in random order. No significant differences in leading edge voltage and total energy were detected for the RA-CS configuration for the seven timing intervals. For the RA-RV configuration, a significant difference was detected comparing the voltage for 125 ms to the 5-minute timing interval. For all times except 125 ms, the RA-RV threshold was significantly higher than the RA-CS level. In contrast to ventricular defibrillation, the ADFT does not change significantly within the first 5 minutes after the initiation of AF for the RA-CS configuration. However, if the shock is given very early (125 ms after AF induction) with the RA-RV configuration, the ADFT is lowered almost to the RA-CS level.

Implantable atrial defibrillator with a single-pass dual-electrode lead

OBJECTIVES

We examined the feasibility and efficacy of using a single-pass, dual-electrode (Solo) lead for atrial fibrillation (AF) detection and defibrillation.

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of an implantable atrial defibrillator (IAD) has been extensively studied; however, separate right atrial (RA) and coronary sinus (CS) defibrillation leads are used for the present system.

METHODS

We studied the use of the Solo lead for AF detection and defibrillation in 17 patients who underwent cardioversion of chronic AF. The Solo lead with a proximal 6-cm RA electrode and a distal 6-cm spiral-shaped CS electrode were positioned into the CS with the RA electrode against the anterolateral RA wall. The RA-CS electrogram signal amplitudes were measured and the efficacy of the Solo lead for AF detection and defibrillation was assessed by using an external version of the IAD.

RESULTS

The leads were inserted in all patients without complication (mean fluoroscopy time: 13.3+/-6.8 min). The mean RA-CS signal amplitude was 484+/-229 microV during sinus rhythm and 274+/-88 microV during AF (p < 0.05). All patients had satisfactory atrial signal amplitude to allow accurate detection of sinus rhythm. Successful cardioversion was achieved in 16/17 (94%) patients with an atrial defibrillation threshold of 320+/-70 V (5.5+/-2.7 J). Insufficient interelectrode spacing resulted in suboptimal electrode locations, associated with a lower atrial signal amplitude, a higher atrial defibrillation threshold and diaphragmatic stimulation.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest a simplified lead configuration with optimal interelectrode spacing can be used with an IAD for AF detection and defibrillation.

The atrial defibrillator: a stand-alone device or part of a combined dual-chamber system?

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an extremely common arrhythmia seen in clinical practice. Because of the limited efficacy of traditional therapeutic strategies to restore and maintain normal sinus rhythm, several nonpharmacologic options have evolved. The promising results achieved with internal atrial defibrillation have facilitated the development of an implantable atrial defibrilator. Preliminary results obtained from an initial study on a small number of highly selected patients with refractory AF suggest that atrial defibrillation can be performed effectively and safely with adequate patient tolerance by using a stand-alone device. The extension of this therapy will depend on the results of well-designed prospective studies comparing this new therapeutic option with traditional methods. Several acute studies have shown that internal conversion of AF is feasible at low energies with current endocardial transvenous lead configurations primarily designed for ventricular defibrillation, but long-term efficacy has, to date, only been demonstrated with atrial implantable defibrillator lead systems. As AF is a frequent arrhythmia in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) recipients, it would seem desirable to incorporate the capability for atrial defibrillation into an ICD. Clinical studies have shown that an atrial defibrillator, as part of a combined dual-chamber ICD system, may not require a potentially complicated switching network for establishing different electrode configurations for atrial and ventricular tachyarrhythmia. The efficacy in atrial cardioversion of such a combined, less complex device seems to be as high as reported for a pure atrial defibrillator, but generally at somewhat higher energy requirements. The results of further investigations will show whether a dual-chamber cardioverter defibrillator would be of clinical relevance in patients with ventricular and supraventricular tachyarrhythmia.

Long-term outcome in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation after successful internal cardioversion

Internal cardioversion is safe and effective in restoring sinus rhythm, even in patients with persistent AF of prolonged duration. Up to 40% to 50% of patients with AF lasting >1 year but <3 years could be maintained in sinus rhythm using a class III antiarrhythmic drug after successful internal cardioversion, and amiodarone appears to be more effective than sotalol in this patient population.

Favorable effects of flecainide in transvenous internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of intravenous (IV) flecainide on defibrillation energy requirements in patients treated with low-energy internal atrial cardioversion.

BACKGROUND

Internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation is becoming a more widely accepted therapy for acute episode termination and for implantable atrial defibrillators.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients with atrial fibrillation (19 persistent, 5 paroxysmal) underwent elective transvenous cardioversion according to a step-up protocol. After successful conversion in a drug-free state, atrial fibrillation was induced by atrial pacing; IV flecainide (2 mg/kg) was administered and a second threshold was determined. In patients in whom cardioversion in a drug-free state failed notwithstanding a 400- to 550-V shock, a threshold determination was attempted after flecainide.

RESULTS

Chronic persistent atrial fibrillation was converted in 13/19 (68%) patients at baseline and in 16/19 (84%) patients after flecainide. Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation was successfully cardioverted in all the patients. A favorable effect of flecainide was observed either in chronic persistent atrial fibrillation (13 patients) or in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (5 patients) with significant reductions in energy requirements for effective defibrillation (persistent atrial fibrillation: 4.42+/-1.37 to 3.50+/-1.51 J, p < 0.005; paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: 1.68+/-0.29 to 0.84+/-0.26 J, p < 0.01). In 14 patients not requiring sedation, the favorable effects of flecainide on defibrillation threshold resulted in a significant reduction in the scores of shock-induced discomfort (3.71+/-0.83 vs. 4.29+/-0.61, p < 0.005). No ventricular proarrhythmia was observed for any shock.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous flecainide reduces atrial defibrillation threshold in patients treated with low-energy internal atrial cardioversion. This reduction in threshold results in lower shock-induced discomfort. Additionally, flecainide may increase the procedure success rate in patients with chronic persistent atrial fibrillation.

[Internal cardioversion with low-energy shocks in atrial fibrillation resistant to external electric cardioversion]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Although external electrical cardioversion is effective in most patients with atrial fibrillation, there are cases refractory to external cardioversion. This study is aimed at showing our initial experience with an internal cardioversion system in patients with previous unsuccessful external cardioversion.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between February, 1997 and September, 1998 nine consecutive patients with spontaneous chronic or persistent atrial fibrillation that failed external cardioversion, were included. Internal cardioversion was performed under sedation with two electrodes that had a 5.5 cm coil placed in the lateral right atrium and coronary sinus. Both electrodes were connected to an external defibrillator capable of delivering R-wave synchronized low-energy biphasic shocks following a minimum RR interval of 500 ms. Energy between 2 J and 10 J was applied until the restoration of sinus rhythm or a maximum of 2 shocks of 10 J.

RESULTS

Sinus rhythm was achieved in the nine patients, but in two of them atrial fibrillation recurred after a few beats. Both had underlying structural heart disease. The other 7 patients, 5 of them without structural heart disease, were in sinus rhythm at discharge. No mechanic complications or ventricular arrhythmias were observed. Six patients are in sinus rhythm after 4 +/- 3 months of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-energy intracardiac cardioversion is useful in some patients with atrial fibrillation that had failed external cardioversion and can be performed without general anesthesia.

Performance of temporary epicardial stainless steel wire electrodes used to treat atrial fibrillation: a study in patients following open heart surgery

AF is the most common arrhythmia following open heart surgery. Transthoracic cardioversion is used when pharmacological treatment fails to restore SR, or is ineffective in controlling ventricular response rate. We report on the performance of temporary atrial defibrillation wire electrodes implanted on the epicardium of patients undergoing open heart surgery. Epicardial stainless steel wire electrodes for both pacing/sensing and atrial defibrillation were placed at the left and right atrium during open heart surgery in 100 consecutive patients (age 65 +/- 9 years; male/female 77/23). Electrophysiological studies performed postoperatively revealed a test shock (0.3 J) impedance of 96 +/- 12 omega (monophasic) and 97 +/- 13 omega (biphasic). AF was induced by burst stimulation in 84 patients. All patients were successfully converted to SR. The mean energy of successful shocks was 3.1 +/- 1.9 J. Atrial pacing and sensing were accomplished in all patients. Pacing threshold was 1.9 +/- 1.7 V (0.5 ms) in the left atrium and 2.1 +/- 2 V in the right atrium. P wave sensing was 2.5 +/- 1.6 mV in the left atrium and 2.3 +/- 1.4 mV in the right atrium. No complications were observed with shock application, nor with lead extraction. Atrial defibrillation using temporary epicardial wire electrodes can be performed successfully and safely in patients following cardiac operations. The shock energy required to restore SR is low. Electrical cardioversion in the absence of anesthesia should be feasible.

Initial experience with a new balloon-guided single lead catheter for internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and dual chamber pacing

BACKGROUND

Based on the observation that internal cardioversion (IntCV) of atrial fibrillation is effective with electrodes in the right atrium and pulmonary artery, a new balloon-guided catheter and external defibrillation device with optional dual chamber pacing was evaluated.

METHODS

IntCV was attempted in 27 patients (age: 57 +/- 10 years, duration: 14 +/- 18 months, left atrial diameter 56 +/- 8 mm) using a new defibrillation device (Alert, EP MedSystems, Inc., NJ, USA) that allows the delivery of biphasic shocks (0.5-15 J, variable tilt), atrial and ventricular pacing, and online signal recording. Pacing and defibrillation shocks were applied via a 7.5 Fr balloon-guided catheter (EP MedSystems, Inc.). Pacing, sensing, and triggering were established through the proximal atrial array and an electrode ring between both defibrillation arrays and a single ventricular electrode ring. Catheters were inserted from the antecubital vein.

RESULTS

In 25 of 27 patients sinus rhythm was restored with a mean energy of 6.7 +/- 4.5 J. In five patients, atrial postshock pacing was required for bradycardia and atrial premature beats. The mean fluoroscopy time was 2.0 +/- 1.3 minutes.

CONCLUSION

The high success rate, ease of application, and backup dual chamber pacing suggest that this system is an alternative to established methods of cardioversion. In certain indications, such as failure of prior external cardioversion and situations in which a standard pulmonary balloon catheter is needed, this system would be advantageous.

Low energy intracardiac cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation

The aims of the study were to verify the efficacy and safety of low energy internal cardioversion (LEIC) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) and to identify the factors affecting the atrial defibrillation threshold (ADT). Forty-nine patients with persistent (lasting > or = 10 days) AF underwent LEIC. In each patient, two 6 Fr custom-made catheters with large active surface areas were positioned in the coronary sinus (cathode) and the lateral right wall (anode), respectively, for shock delivery, and a tetrapolar lead was placed in the right ventricular apex for R wave synchronization. Truncated, biphasic (3 ms + 3 ms), exponential shocks were used, beginning at 50 V and increasing in steps of 50 V until sinus rhythm had been restored. Mild sedation (diazepam 5 mg i.v.) was administered to 12 patients. Sinus rhythm was restored in all the subjects with mean voltage and energy levels of 352.0 +/- 80.3 V and 8.2 +/- 3.4 J, respectively. The ADT in patients pretreated with amiodarone (6.4 +/- 1.8 J) was lower than that of patients who had not received any antiarrhythmic drugs (9.2 +/- 3.7) (P = 0.04). No ventricular arrhythmias were induced by any of the atrial shocks, and no other complications were observed. During a mean follow-up of 162.9 +/- 58.7 days, AF recurred in 21 (43%) patients; 71% of these occurred in the first week after cardioversion. LEIC is effective in restoring sinus rhythm in patients with persistent AF. The technique seems to be safe and does not require general anesthesia or, in most cases, sedation. Patients pretreated with amiodarone have lower ADTs.

Atrioverter: an implantable device for the treatment of atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

During atrial fibrillation, electrophysiological changes occur in atrial tissue that favor the maintenance of the arrhythmia and facilitate recurrence after conversion to sinus rhythm. An implantable defibrillator connected to right atrial and coronary sinus defibrillation leads allows prompt restoration of sinus rhythm by a low-energy shock. The safety and efficacy of this system, called the Atrioverter, were evaluated in a prospective, multicenter study.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study included 51 patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation who had not responded to antiarrhythmic drugs, were in New York Heart Association Heart failure class I or II, and were at low risk for ventricular arrhythmias. The atrial defibrillation threshold had to be </=240 V during preimplant testing. Atrial fibrillation detection, R-wave shock synchronization, and defibrillation threshold were tested at implantation and during follow-up. Shock termination of spontaneous episodes of atrial fibrillation was performed under physician observation. Results are given after a minimum of 3 months of follow-up. During a follow-up of 72 to 613 days (mean, 259+/-138 days), 96% of 227 spontaneous episodes of atrial fibrillation in 41 patients were successfully converted to sinus rhythm by the Atrioverter. In 27% of episodes, several shocks were required because of early recurrence of atrial fibrillation. Shocks did not induce ventricular arrhythmias. Most patients received antiarrhythmic medication during follow-up. In 4 patients, the Atrioverter was removed: in 1 because of infection, in 1 because of cardiac tamponade, and in 1 because of frequent episodes of atrial fibrillation requiring His bundle ablation.

CONCLUSIONS

With the Atrioverter, prompt and safe restoration of sinus rhythm is possible in patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation.

Low-energy cardioversion with epicardial wire electrodes: new treatment of atrial fibrillation after open heart surgery

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia after open heart surgery. Traditional treatment with a range of antiarrhythmic drugs and electrical cardioversion is associated with considerable side effects. The aim of this study was to examine the feasibility and efficacy of low-energy atrial defibrillation with temporary epicardial defibrillation wire electrodes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Epicardial defibrillation wire electrodes were placed at the left and right atria during open heart surgery in 100 consecutive patients (age 65+/-9 years; male to female ratio 67:23). Electrophysiological studies performed postoperatively revealed a test shock (0.3 J) impedance of 96+/-12 omega (monophasic) and 97+/-13 omega (biphasic). During their hospital stay, AF occurred in 23 patients (23%) at 2.1+/-1.3 days postoperatively. Internal atrial defibrillation was performed in 20 patients. Of these patients, 80% (16/20) were successfully cardioverted with a mean energy of 5.2+/-3 J. Early recurrence of AF (< or =60 seconds after defibrillation) developed in 8 patients. Five patients had multiple episodes of AF. In total, 35 episodes of AF were treated, with an 88% success rate. Only 6 patients (30%) required sedation. No complications were observed with shock application or with lead extraction.

CONCLUSIONS

Atrial defibrillation with temporary epicardial wire electrodes can be performed safely and effectively in patients after cardiac operations. The shock energy required to restore sinus rhythm is low. Thus, patients can be cardioverted without anesthesia.

Optimization of shocking lead configuration for transvenous atrial defibrillation

INTRODUCTION

High atrial defibrillation energy requirements (ADER) in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) may limit the acceptance of transvenous atrial defibrillation. We evaluated an optimized defibrillation electrode configuration that could help to reduce the ADER in patients with AF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We tested ten different configurations in nine dogs with AF (3.33+/-2.92 days) induced by rapid atrial pacing. The configurations were: right atrial (RA) appendage as anode and coronary sinus (CS) as cathode; RA and innominate vein (I) as anode to CS (cathode); RA-CS (anode) to I (cathode); I-CS (anode) to RA (cathode); RA and left lateral subcutaneous patch (P) as anode to CS (cathode); RA-CS (anode) to P (cathode); P-CS (anode) to RA (cathode); superior vena cava (SVC) and CS (anode) to RA (cathode); RA-CS (anode) to SVC (cathode); and RA-SVC (anode) to CS (cathode). ADER was defined as the voltage needed to defibrillate the atria in 10% to 90% of 20 consecutive shocks. Three lead systems had ADER lower than the RA (anode) to CS (cathode) configuration, which required a mean of 143+/-58 volts. These three were: RA-SVC (anode) to CS (cathode) 103+/-29 V; I-CS (anode) to RA (cathode) 129+/-39 V; and P-CS (anode) to RA (cathode) 130+/-38 V. The remaining configurations had ADER higher than the RA (anode) to CS (cathode) configuration.

CONCLUSION

Adding an additional shocking electrode may reduce ADER when compared with the RA (anode) to CS (cathode) configuration. This concept could be incorporated into future implantable atrial defibrillators or used for refractory patients undergoing temporary transvenous cardioversion.

Effects of left atrial dilatation on the endocardial atrial defibrillation threshold: a study in an ovine model of pacing induced dilated cardiomyopathy

Left atrial (LA) dilation is a common finding in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation (AF). Progressive dilatation may alter the atrial defibrillation threshold (ADFT). In our study, epicardial electrodes were implanted on the LA free wall and right ventricular apex of eight adult sheep. Large surface area, coiled endocardial electrodes were positioned in the coronary sinus and right atrium (RA). LA dilatation was induced by rapid ventricular pacing (190 beats/min) for 6 weeks and echocardiographically assessed weekly along with the ADFT (under propofol anesthesia). LA effective refractory period (ERP) was measured every 2-3 days using a standard extra stimulus technique and 400 ms drive. The AF cycle length (AFCL) was assessed from LA electrograms. During the 6 weeks of pacing the mean LA area increased from 6.1 +/- 1.5 to 21.3 +/- 2.4 cm2. There were no significant changes in the mean ADFT (122 +/- 15 V), circuit impedance (46 +/- 5 omega), or LA AFCL (136 +/- 23 ms). There was a significant increase in the mean LA ERP (106 +/- 10 ms at day 0, and 120 +/- 13 ms at day 42 of pacing). In this study, using chronically implanted defibrillation leads, the minimal energy requirements for successful AF were not significantly altered by ongoing left atrial dilatation. This finding is a further endorsement of the efficiency of the coronary sinus/RA shock vector. Furthermore, the apparent stability of the AF present may be a further indication of a link between the type of AF and the ADFT.

The effects of ventricular fibrillation duration and site of initiation on the defibrillation threshold during early ventricular fibrillation

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine if the defibrillation threshold (DFT) is lower during the first few cycles of ventricular fibrillation (VF) than after 10 s of VF and, if so, if the effect is caused by local or global factors.

BACKGROUND

The DFT may be low very early during VF because: (1) for the first few cycles VF arises from a localized region close to a defibrillation electrode where the shock field is strong (local factors), or (2) during early VF the effects of ischemia and sympathetic discharge have not yet fully developed and the heart has not yet completely dilated (global factors).

METHODS

Protocol 1 included seven pigs in which a defibrillation electrode and a pacing catheter were both placed in the right ventricular apex. VF was induced by delivering a high current premature stimulus from the pacing catheter that should have caused reentry confined to the right ventricular apex for the first few cycles of VF. A bipolar electrogram was recorded from the tip of the defibrillation catheter. Using a three reversal up-down protocol, the DFT was determined for biphasic shocks delivered after 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 15, 20 and 25 activations in this electrogram and after 10 s (control). Protocol 2 included seven pigs undergoing the same procedure as in protocol 1 except that an additional pacing catheter was placed in the left ventricle. Defibrillation thresholds were determined after 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 VF activations following VF induction from the right ventricle (RV) or the left ventricle (LV) and after 10 s (control).

RESULTS

In protocol 1, the mean +/- SD DFrs were lower during the first three cycles than after 10 s of VF (3.0 +/- 4.1 J for the first VF cycle vs 15.8 +/- 6.6 J after 10 s of VF, p < 0.05). In protocol 2, the DFF for the first few cycles of VF induced away from the defibrillation electrode in the LV (6.9 +/- 1.4 J for the first VF cycle) was significantly lower than that after 10 s of VF (16.0 +/- 2.2 J), whereas the DFF for the first few cycles induced near the defibrillation electrode in the right ventricular apex was significantly lower (2.3 +/- 2.7 J for the first VF cycle) than that induced from the LV.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that the DFT is significantly lower during the first few VF cycles of VF than after 10 s of VF and that this decrease may be caused by both local factors and global factors. These results provide an impetus for exploring earlier shock delivery in implantable devices.

Effect of electrode length on atrial defibrillation thresholds

INTRODUCTION

Catheter-based electrodes have been used previously to terminate episodes of atrial fibrillation in animals and man. Typically, these electrodes span 6 to 7 cm, and lowest energy requirements are achieved when these electrodes are positioned in the distal coronary sinus and in the right atrium. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of longer electrode lengths for atrial defibrillation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 15 patients, two decapolar catheters were inserted, one into the distal coronary sinus and one in the right atrium. To provide longer electrodes lengths, a third catheter was inserted and alternated positioned in the right atrium or coronary sinus. A 6-cm electrode span was obtained by using the distal 8 rings on the coronary sinus catheter or 8 consecutive electrodes on the right atrial catheter and increased from 6 to 11 cm by connecting 5 consecutive, nonoverlapping rings of the third catheter with the 10 rings of the initial right atrial or coronary sinus catheter. Atrial defibrillation thresholds were determined twice, in a randomized order, in each patient for each of the three combinations of electrode lengths. All 15 patients could be successfully converted to sinus rhythm without complications; however, one patient could be converted reproducibly with only 2 of the 3 electrode combinations. Mean thresholds were 306 +/- 102 V, 5.9 +/- 4.0 J for the 6 cm/6 cm electrode length combination with an impedance of 72 +/- 18 omega. For the electrode combination using the 11-cm electrode in the right atrium, the defibrillation threshold was 296 +/- 107 V, 5.8 +/- 3.9 J with an impedance of 61 +/- 17 omega and was 294 +/- 91 V, 5.6 +/- 3.6 J with an impedance of 55 +/- 11 omega for the 11-cm electrode in the coronary sinus. There were no significant differences in defibrillation voltage or energy (P > 0.05) associated with the longer electrode lengths; however, the longer electrode lengths did significantly lower shock impedance (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The use of longer electrodes, when using the right atrium to coronary sinus shock vector, does not lower the defibrillation requirements for restoration of sinus rhythm.

Distribution of fast heart rate episodes during paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the defibrillator waiting time (time between the recognition of atrial fibrillation and the actual shock) by studying paroxysmal atrial fibrillation episodes with RR intervals shorter than a certain limit (that is, episodes during which defibrillation should not be attempted).

METHODS

Long term 24 hour Holter recordings from a digoxin v placebo crossover study in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation were analysed. In all, 23 recordings with atrial fibrillation episodes of at least 1000 ventricular cycles and with < 20% Holter artefacts or noise were used (11 recorded on placebo and 12 on digoxin). For each recording, the mean ("mean waiting time") and maximum ("maximum waiting time") duration of continuous sections of atrial fibrillation episodes with all RR intervals shorter than a certain threshold were evaluated, ranging the threshold from 400 to 1000 ms in 10 ms steps. For each threshold, the mean and maximum waiting times were compared between recordings on placebo and on digoxin.

RESULTS

Both the mean and maximum waiting times increased exponentially with increasing threshold. Practically acceptable mean waiting times less than one minute were observed with thresholds below 600 ms. There were no significant differences in mean waiting times and maximum waiting times between recordings on placebo and digoxin, and only a trend towards shorter waiting times on digoxin.

CONCLUSIONS

Introduction of a minimum RR interval threshold required to deliver atrial defibrillation leads to practically acceptable delays between atrial fibrillation recognition and the actual shock. These delays are not prolonged by digoxin treatment.

Spontaneous reinitiation of atrial fibrillation following transvenous atrial defibrillation

Spontaneous reinitiation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been systematically looked at in patients undergoing transvenous AF. This study involved 11 patients, the mean age 60 +/- 8 years, 3 male and 8 female, in whom transvenous atrial defibrillation successfully converted AF to sinus rhythm. Eight patients had paroxysmal AF and three patients had chronic persistent AF for 4 weeks or more. Four patients were taking antiarrhythmic medications at the time of testing. Multipolar transvenous catheters were positioned inside the coronary sinus, right atrium, and the right ventricle. Atrial defibrillation testing was performed using the METRIX atrial defibrillation system in nine patients and the Ventritex HVSO2 in the remaining two patients. A total of 64 therapeutic shocks (range 3-11) were delivered in the 11 patients, and 31 of these successfully converted AF to sinus rhythm. In four patients spontaneous AF was reinitiated following 12 successful transvenous atrial defibrillation episodes. The mean time to reinitiation of AF following shock delivery and restoration of sinus rhythm was 8.26 +/- 5.25 seconds, range 1.8-19.9 seconds. All 12 episodes of spontaneous AF were preceded by a spontaneous premature atrial complex. The coupling interval of the premature atrial complexes was 443 +/- 43 ms, range 390-510 ms. None of the patients taking antiarrhythmic medications or those demonstrating no premature atrial complexes had spontaneous reinitiation of AF. In conclusion, spontaneous reinitiation of AF can occur in a significant proportion of patients with AF undergoing transvenous atrial defibrillation. This phenomenon is preceded by the occurrence of atrial premature complex. Findings of this study may have significant clinical implications.

Update on Atrial Fibrillation: Restoration of Sinus Rhythm or Ventricular Rate Control?

In patients with persistent atrial fibrillation, two therapeutic alternatives exist, namely restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm versus ventricular rate control combined with anticoagulation. Currently, the selection of the best therapeutic strategy in an individual patient relies for the most part on clinical judgement and personal experience. At present, there are no prospective scientific data to support the superiority of one treatment over the other with respect to overall survival or quality of life. This review summarizes the present knowledge on this important clinical problem with particular emphasis on issues such as efficacy of antiarrhythmic drugs to prevent recurrent atrial fibrillation, proarrhythmic hazards of these compounds, or efficacy and safety of anticoagulation in nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. These data serve as the basis of ongoing clinical trials prospectively comparing the merits and demerits of the two therapeutic strategies in the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice.