Nonreentrant supraventricular tachycardia due to simultaneous conduction over fast and slow AV node pathways: successful treatment with radiofrequency ablation

Narrow QRS Complex Tachycardia With Variable R-R Intervals and Discrete P Waves

Irregular narrow QRS complex tachycardia is associated with a wide range of differential diagnoses, including atrial fibrillation and atrial tachyarrhythmia with altered atrioventricular conduction. Here, we present a case of narrow QRS complex tachycardia with variable R-R intervals and discrete P waves. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

Nonreentrant atrioventricular nodal tachycardia: The great simulator

We present the case of a healthy 12-year-old boy without structural heart disease who was followed for several years for an arrhythmia with diverse and incorrect initial diagnoses, refractory to flecainide, metoprolol and verapamil. Thorough reevaluation of the electrocardiographic recordings led to a presumptive diagnosis of a non-reentrant atrioventricular nodal tachycardia, subsequently confirmed with electrophysiology study. Radiofrequency ablation was performed during the procedure and the arrhythmia resolved. Double conduction through the atrioventricular node often simulates other arrhythmias, leading to misdiagnosis.

[Dual AV nodal nonreentry tachycardia (DAVNNT): unrecognized differential diagnosis with far-reaching consequences]

BACKGROUND

The dual atrioventricular nodal nonreentry tachycardia (DAVNNT) is a rare form of tachycardia which occurs due to a time delayed double antegrade conduction via the slow and fast atrioventricular nodal pathways. Its epidemiology is not known so far. The aim of this article is to present the clinical findings in a series of patients with DAVNNT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed our database of patients who successfully underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation between January 2012 and March 2013 due to diagnosed supraventricular tachycardia.

RESULTS

In 3 out of 231 patients DAVNNT could be successfully treated by slow pathway modulation/ablation. Patients presented with widely varying symptoms including syncope, palpitations which had been mistaken as atrial fibrillation, and inappropriate defibrillator shocks due to suspected ventricular tachycardia.

CONCLUSIONS

The DAVNNT seems to be more common than previously thought. This important differential diagnosis needs to be taken into consideration as slow pathway modulation can be curative while a misdiagnosis, such as atrial fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia might result in over-treatment in patients with this arrhythmia.

Symptomatic sinus tachycardia with perpetuating slow pathway: successful treatment with radiofrequency ablation

We report a case of sinus tachycardia with perpetuating slow pathway (SP) conduction in a 42-year-old woman who developed severe symptoms as a result of atrioventricular (AV) desynchronization. The restoration of an AV synchrony, achieved with selective radiofrequency ablation of the SP, eliminated the symptomatic arrhythmia and may represent a reasonable therapeutic option despite the fact that the patient has no AV-node reentrant tachycardia. This case demonstrates the importance of AV timing.

Isoproterenol facilitation of slow pathway ablation in incessant dual atrioventricular nodal nonreentrant tachycardia

Catheter ablation of the slow atrioventricular (AV) nodal pathway is the treatment of choice for dual AV nodal nonreentrant tachycardia. Rapid ventricular rates during incessant tachycardia may compromise catheter stability and increase the risk of AV block. Conduction via the slow AV nodal pathway may mimic junctional beats with retrograde block, which is an indicator to cease ablation. We report a case of incessant dual AV nodal nonreentrant tachycardia where intravenous isoproterenol was instrumental in facilitating catheter ablation by eliminating these two factors.

Nonreentrant supraventricular tachycardia misdiagnosed as inappropriate sinus tachycardia

We report a case of a woman with incessant palpitations initially misdiagnosed as inappropriate sinus tachycardia that proved refractory to β-blockers. At the time of electrophysiologic testing, a sustained narrow-complex tachycardia with a 1:2 atrioventricular relationship was repeatedly initiated by a posterior fascicle depolarization induced by means of a timed ventricular extrastimulus. The tachycardia was repeatedly terminated with a timed atrial extrastimulus, which excluded junctional bigeminy and confirmed the diagnosis of nonreentrant supraventricular tachycardia. Catheter ablation of the slow pathway eliminated dual-pathway conduction and tachycardia.

Simultaneous Dual Fast and Slow Pathway Conduction upon Induction of Typical Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia: Electrophysiologic Characteristics in a Series of Patients

INTRODUCTION

Simultaneous dual atrioventricular nodal conduction (SDNC) through slow (SP) and fast pathway (FP) is a rare phenomenon observed upon the induction of atrioventricular nodal reciprocating tachycardia (AVNRT). The aim of this study is to report the electrophysiological features of patients showing typical AVNRT induced through SDNC.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Among 461 consecutive patients with typical AVNRT submitted to radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA), seven patients (1.5%) with SDNC at tachycardia onset (group I: 6 female; age 60-72 years, mean 65.2 +/- 3.8 years) and 118 age-matched controls (group II: 60 female; age 60-88 years, mean 68.4 +/- 6.8 years) were considered. Controls were further subdivided into two subgroups according to age: subgroup A (94 patients, age 60-75 years) and subgroup B (24 patients, age >75 years). The value of the following parameters was significantly higher in group I than in group II and in subgroup A: A-H interval [113 +/- 26 vs. 89 +/- 27 (P < 0.01) vs. 84 +/- 19 (P < 0.001)], ventriculoatrial conduction effective refractory period [355 +/- 85 vs. 293 +/- 87 (P < 0.05) vs. 281 +/- 82 (P < 0.05)], SP conduction time upon AVNRT induction [444 +/- 104 vs. 350 +/- 72 (P < 0.01); vs. 345 +/- 67 (P < 0.001)], AVNRT cycle length [484 +/- 103 vs. 396 +/- 71 ms (P < 0.05); vs. 384 +/- 69 (P < 0.05)], and rate of AVNRT induction from ventricle [71% vs. 10% (P = 0.001); vs. 6% (P = 0.001)]. Differences were mostly not significant between group I and subgroup B. SP location and RFCA success rate were similar in all groups.

CONCLUSION

In a population of AVNRT patients, SDNC at AVNRT induction is infrequent and it prevails beyond the fifth decade of life and in females. SDNC is associated with peculiar AVN conduction features, which resemble the age-related modifications of AVN conduction.

Dual Conduction in a Mahaim Fiber

The case of an 8-year-old girl with incessant nonsustained left bundle branch block-like tachycardia refractory to antiarrhythmic drug therapy is reported. Electrophysiologic study revealed the presence of a right-sided accessory atriofascicular pathway. Episodes of nonsustained tachycardia were found to be based upon a dual response in AV conduction over the Mahaim fiber to one P wave. No reentrant tachycardia could be induced. The arrhythmia was cured by catheter ablation targeting a Mahaim potential at the right lateral tricuspid annulus. The findings can be explained by longitudinal dissociation in a single Mahaim fiber, a fiber distally diverging into two fibers with different conduction times, or (less likely) two closely located Mahaim fibers with different conduction times.

Incessant nonreentrant tachycardia due to simultaneous conduction over dual atrioventricular nodal pathways mimicking atrial fibrillation in patients referred for pulmonary vein isolation

It has been reported that conduction over the fast and slow pathways of the AV node can occur simultaneously, leading to a double ventricular response from each atrial beat. We report the cases of two patients referred to us for evaluation of symptomatic, incessant, and irregular narrow-complex tachycardia, misdiagnosed as atrial fibrillation, for consideration of pulmonary vein isolation. At presentation, careful evaluation of the electrograms revealed the presence of two ventricular activations for each atrial beat. At electrophysiologic study, both patients were found to have nonreentrant tachycardias arising from simultaneous conduction over the fast and slow pathways of the AV node. In one patient, the tachycardia had resulted in cardiomyopathy. Slow AV nodal pathway ablation performed in both patients resulted in cure of their tachycardias and recovery of ventricular function in the patient with cardiomyopathy.

Double ventricular response via dual atrioventricular nodal pathways resulting with nonreentrant supraventricular tachycardia and successfully treated with radiofrequency catheter ablation

We report a patient with a complex nonreentrant supraventricular tachycardia because of double ventricular response resulting from antegrade dual atrioventricular (AV) nodal pathways. We could induce double ventricular response and confirm dual AV nodal pathways by AV simultaneous pacing during basic stimulation proceeding with programmed atrial single extrastimulation. As far as we know, it is the first report about the application of the AV simultaneous basic stimulation to prove the sustained nonreentrant tachycardia because of simultaneous conduction over dual AV nodal pathways. This was also confirmed by absence of the arrhythmia immediately after the elimination of the slow pathway conduction by radiofrequency ablation.

Incessant nonreentrant atrioventricular nodal tachycardia due to multiple nodal pathways treated by radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathways

In patients with dual AV nodal physiology, simultaneous anterograde fast and slow pathway conduction resulting in an unusual form of nonreentrant AV nodal tachycardia has been observed. We describe the case of a young patient with an incessant form of complex supraventricular tachycardia who underwent electrophysiologic evaluation, which showed simultaneous conduction via multiple AV nodal pathways that caused a unique form of incessant nonreentrant AV nodal tachycardia. Radiofrequency ablation of the spatially closed intermediate and slow pathways effectively treated the tachycardia. The electrophysiologic determinants of simultaneous conduction through the multiple nodal pathways and the apparently different behavior of the fast pathway before and after ablation are discussed.

Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia caused by 1:2 atrioventricular conduction in the presence of dual atrioventricular nodal pathways

One-to-two atrioventricular conduction, ie, the double response to a single sinus or atrial impulse, resulting in two QRS complexes for one P wave, is a rare manifestation of dual atrioventricular (AV) nodal pathways. This report describes the case of a 61-year-old woman with continuous episodes of supraventricular tachycardia caused by independent conduction to the ventricles of sinus impulses over both the fast and the slow AV nodal pathway, giving rise to a ventricular rate that was twice the sinus rate. A wide spectrum of electrocardiographic manifestations of 1:2 AV conduction was observed on the surface electrocardiogram. The diagnosis was suggested by several elements including evidence of dual AV nodal pathways during sinus rhythm and cycle length alternans during tachycardia. The patient underwent successful slow pathway ablation with complete disappearance of symptoms and electrocardiographic manifestations of 1:2 AV conduction.

Association between nonreentrant supraventricular tachycardia and atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia: a presentation of dual AV node physiology

Persistent simultaneous conduction of P waves over a fast and a slow nodal pathway defines the nonreentrant type of supraventricular tachycardia, usually not associated with reciprocating movements. We report a unique association between this uncommon tachycardia and a usual AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, made possible by the existence of three different nodal pathways.