AV conduction with atrial rate adaptive pacing in the bradycardia tachycardia syndrome

Non-physiological increase of AV conduction time in sinus disease patients programmed in AAIR-based pacing mode

PURPOSE

The EVOCAV(DS) trial aimed to quantify the paradoxal atrioventricular (AV) conduction time lengthening in sinus node (SD) patients (pts) paced in AAIR-based pacing mode.

METHODS

SD pts, implanted with dual-chamber pacemaker programmed in AAIR-based pacing mode, were randomized in two arms for a 1-month period: the low atrial pacing (LAP; basic rate at 60 bpm, dual sensor with minimal slope) and the high atrial pacing (HAP; basic rate at 70 bpm, dual sensor with optimized slope, overdrive pacing) arm. At 1 month, crossover was performed for an additional 1-month period. AV conduction time, AV block occurrence and AV conduction time adaptation during exercise were ascertained from device memories at each follow-up.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine pts participated to the analysis (75 ± 8 years; 32 male; PR = 184 ± 38 ms; bundle branch block n = 12; AF history n = 36; antiarrhythmic treatment n = 53; beta-blockers n = 27; class III/Ic n = 18; both n = 8). The mean AV conduction time was significantly greater during the HAP (275 ± 51 ms) vs. LAP (263 ± 49 ms) period (p < 0.0001). Class III/Ic drugs were the only predictors of this abnormal behaviour. Degree II/III AV blocks occurred in 49 % of pts in the HAP vs. 19 % in the LAP period (p < 0.0001). Fifty-two patients (66 %) presented a lengthening of AV conduction time during exercise.

CONCLUSION

AAIR-based pacing in SD pts may induce a significant lengthening of pts' AV conduction time, including frequent abnormal adaptation of AV conduction time during exercise.

Reducing Ventricular Pacing in Sinus Node Dysfunction DDIR versus DDDR

BACKGROUND

The use of DDIR mode has been limited since the advent of mode switch in the DDDR mode. In patients with AV block, DDDR is necessary to maintain AV synchrony. However, DDIR mode may still be beneficial for patients with intact AV conduction. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of ventricular pacing and atrial tachyarrhythmia in DDIR and DDDR with mode switch in a randomized, single-blind, crossover study, and discuss the utility of both modes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-four patients (8 males) with bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome and no signs of AV block (mean age 70.1 +/- -9.1 years) were enrolled and randomized to DDIR or DDDR modes with the leads placed at the right atrial appendage and right ventricular apex. After 12 weeks, patients were switched to the opposite mode. During the study period, atrial high rate episodes and other pacemaker diagnostic data were collected. Significantly less ventricular pacing was observed in DDIR mode (DDIR versus DDDR; 48.9%, 76.5%, P = 0.0002) and atrial high rate episodes were significantly lower in DDIR mode (DDIR versus DDDR; 1.32, 1.85 per day, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In patients with sinus node dysfunction and intact AV conduction, DDIR mode may have important implications for simplifying device programming, device longevity, and to avoid atrial tachyarrhythmia.