High impedance low energy pacing leads: long-term results with a very small surface area steroid-eluting lead compared to three conventional electrodes

Design and Validation of a Surface-Contact Electrode for Gastric Pacing and Concurrent Slow-Wave Mapping

OBJECTIVE

Gastric contractions are, in part, coordinated by slow-waves. Functional motility disorders are correlated with abnormal slow-wave patterns. Gastric pacing has been attempted in a limited number of studies to correct gastric dysmotility. Integrated electrode arrays capable of pacing and recording slow-wave responses are required.

METHODS

New flexible surface-contact pacing electrodes (SPE) that can be placed atraumatically to pace and simultaneously map the slow-wave activity in the surrounding area were developed. SPE were applied in pigs in-vivo for gastric pacing along with concurrent high-resolution slow wave mapping as validation. Histology was conducted to assess for tissue damage around the pacing site. SPE were compared against temporary cardiac pacing electrodes (CPE), and hook-shaped pacing electrodes (HPE), for entrainment rate, entrainment threshold, contact quality, and slow-wave propagation patterns.

RESULTS

Pacing with SPE (amplitude: 2 mA, pulse width: 100 ms) consistently achieved pacemaker initiation. Histological analysis illustrated no significant tissue damage. SPE resulted in a higher rate of entrainment (64%) than CPE (37%) and HPE (24%), with lower entrainment threshold (25% of CPE and 16% of HPE). High resolution mapping showed that there was no significant difference between the initiated slow-wave propagation speed for SPE and CPE (6.8 ± 0.1 vs 6.8 ± 0.2 mm/s, P>0.05). However, SPE had higher loss of tissue lead contact quality than CPE (42 ± 16 vs 13 ± 10% over 20 min).

CONCLUSION

Pacing with SPE induced a slow-wave pacemaker site without tissue damage.

SIGNIFICANCE

SPE offered an atraumatic pacing electrode with a significant reduction of power consumption and placement time compared to impaled electrodes.

Epicardial left ventricular leads via minimally invasive technique: a role of steroid eluting leads

Background

We retrospectively assessed two types of sutureless screw-in left ventricular (LV) leads (steroid eluting vs. non-steroid eluting) in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implantation with regards to their electrical performance.

Methods

Between March 2008 and May 2014 an epicardial LV lead was implanted in 32 patients after failed transvenous LV lead placement using a left-sided lateral minithoracotomy or video-assisted thoracoscopy (mean age 64 ± 9 years). Patients were divided into two groups according to the type of implanted lead. Steroid eluting (SE) group: 21 patients (Myodex™ 1084 T; St. Jude Medical) and non-steroid eluting (NSE) group: 11 patients (MyoPore® 511,212; Greatbatch Medical).

Results

All epicardial leads could be placed successfully, without any intraoperative complications or mortality. With regard to the implanted lead following results were observed: sensing (mV): SE 8.8 ± 6.1 vs. NSE 10.1 ± 5.3 (p = 0.380); pacing threshold (V@0.5 ms): SE 1.0 ± 0.5 vs. NSE 0.9 ± 0.5 (p = 0.668); impedance (ohms): SE 687 ± 236 vs. NSE 790 ± 331 (p = 0.162). At the follow-up (2.6 ± 1.9 years) the following results were seen: sensing (mV): SE 8.7 ± 5.0 vs. NSE 11.2 ± 6.6 (p = 0.241), pacing threshold (V@0.5 ms): SE 1.4 ± 0.5 vs. NSE 1.0 ± 0.3 (p = 0.035), impedance (ohms): SE 381 ± 95 vs. NSE 434 ± 88 (p = 0.129).

Conclusions

Based on the results no strong differences have been found between the both types of epicardial LV leads (steroid eluting vs. non-steroid eluting) in CRT implantation in short- and midterm.

Controlled metallic nanopillars for low impedance biomedical electrode

Radial metallic nanopillar/nanowire structures can be created by a controlled radiofrequency (RF) plasma processing technique on the surface of certain alloy wires, including important biomedical alloys such as MP35N (Co-Ni-Cr-Mo alloy), platinum-iridium and stainless steel. In electrode applications such as pacemakers or neural stimulators, the increase in surface area in elongated MP35N nanopillars allows for decreased surface impedance and greater current density. However, the nanopillar height on MP35N alloy tends to be self-limiting at ∼1-3μm. The objective of this study was to further elongate the radial nanopillars so as to reduce electrode impedance for biomedical electrode applications. Intelligent experimental design allowed for efficient investigation of processing parameters, including plasma material, process duration, power, pressure and repetition. It was found that multi-step repeated processing in the parameter-controlled RF environment could increase nanopillar height to ∼10μm, a 400% improvement, while the RF plasma processing with identical total duration but in a single step did not lead to desired nanopillar elongation. Measurement of electrode impedance in phosphate-buffered saline solution showed an associated decrease to one-fifth of the surface impedance of unprocessed wire for signals below 100Hz. For the purposes of this study, MP35N and Pt-Ir wires were characterized and demonstrated augmented surface impedance properties which, in combination with superior cell integration, enhanced biomedical electrode performance.

Clinical testing of a new pacemaker function to monitor ventricular capture

Automatic beat-by-beat capture functions are designed to minimize the pacing energy delivered, while maintaining the highest safety by delivering an immediate back-up stimulus in case of loss of capture. The objective of this study was to estimate the lowering of ventricular pacing amplitude allowed by such a function, compared to amplitudes usually set manually in routine practice. An automatic ventricular pacing threshold test is launched every 6 hours to measure the automatic capture threshold (AT). From AT the function calculates: (1) the"capture amplitude"(V(c)) = AT + 0.5 V at a minimum output of 1 V and (2) the"safety amplitude" (V(s)) = twice AT at a minimum output of 2.5 V. The function preferentially uses V(c) and verifies capture after each paced beat. In case of loss of capture, a back-up spike is delivered and V(s) is implemented until the next threshold measurement. We estimated the ventricular amplitude delivered by the pacemaker from data stored in the pacemaker memory. We compared these values with the pacing amplitude typically programmed manually (MPA) by physicians at twice AT and a minimum of 2.5 V. Data from 57 recipients of Talent 3 DR pacemakers were analyzed. Complete data sets were available in 25 patients at 1 day, 28 at 1 month, and 39 between 1 day and 1 month. No loss of capture or ventricular pause was observed on 53 ambulatory electrocardiograms (ECG); and pulse amplitude automatically delivered by the device was significantly lower than the MPA at each of the three time points analyzed. This new beat-by-beat capture function allows a significant lowering of the pacing amplitude compared to manual settings, while preserving a 100% safety.

Long‐Term Performance of Transvenous, Steroid‐Eluting, High Impedance, Passive‐Fixation Ventricular Pacing Leads

The long-term performance of two high impedance, steroid-eluting, passive-fixation ventricular leads, porous platinum iridium electrode CPI Selute Picotip 4035 (131 patients), and platinized platinum electrode Medtronic Capsure Z 5034 (57 patients), was compared with one conventional 8.0-mm2 porous platinum iridium electrode CPI Selute 4285 (38 patients). The mean follow-up period was 28 +/- 14 months. Capture threshold, R wave amplitude, and pacing impedance were measured at the time of implantation, immediately after implantation, 1 week, 1, 3, and 6 months after implantation and then every 6 months thereafter. The two high impedance leads revealed a higher sensing slew rate than the conventional lead, the R wave amplitude was similar among the three groups, but the voltage threshold at 0.5-ms pulse width was significantly higher in porous platinum iridium groups at the time of implantation. During follow-up, the conventional lead revealed a significantly higher R wave amplitude within the first 3 months, however, this pattern disappeared after 3 months. Pacing impedance was significantly higher in the high impedance porous platinum iridium electrode groups. Voltage threshold at 0.5-ms pulse width was similar among the three groups in the first 3 months, however, it increased gradually and was significantly higher in porous platinum iridium electrode groups subsequently. The energy threshold at 0.5 ms was significantly lower in the two high impedance groups than the conventional group, but no difference was found in the two high impedance groups. Lead related complications were similar among the three groups. In conclusion, high impedance electrodes with different design and materials had different properties; platinized platinum electrode showed a lower pacing impedance but had a more stable long-term capture threshold as compared to the porous platinum iridium electrode. Further studies are mandatory for the development of an ideal pacing lead.

Worldwide evaluation of a defibrillation lead with a small geometric electrode surface for high-impedance pacing

BACKGROUND

Pacing leads with a small electrode surface for high-impedance stimulation have been shown to prolong pacemaker longevity, but no sufficient data is available on the safety and feasibility of a defibrillation lead with this novel design.

METHODS

We evaluated the clinical performance of a tined, steroid-eluting defibrillation lead with a small electrode surface area (model 6944) in a prospective multicenter study. A total of 542 patients with conventional indications for an implantable cardioverter defibrillator were randomized 1:1 to receive either the model 6944 or a tined, steroid-eluting defibrillation lead with a conventional sized electrode surface area (model 6942). Device performance and electrical parameters were evaluated at implant and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months thereafter (mean follow-up 11.3 +/- 5.6 months).

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics, lead implant success rates, and defibrillation thresholds did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. While pacing thresholds did not differ significantly during follow-up, pacing impedance was approximately twice as high in the model 6944 as in the model 6942 lead (P <.0001). Mean R-wave amplitudes were smaller in patients with a 6944 (9.1 +/- 3.1 mV vs 9.8 +/- 3.6 mV for model 6942, P <.05), but remained stable within both groups throughout the observation period. The total number of ventricular lead-related adverse events and patient survival did not differ significantly between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a defibrillation lead with a small electrode surface for high-efficiency pacing is safe and feasible and increases pacing impedance without significantly compromising clinical performance.

The Influence of High Versus Normal Impedance Ventricular Leads on Pacemaker Generator Longevity

As pacemaker generator longevity is dependent on current consumption and resistance of the pacing lead, the use of a high impedance pacing lead theoretically results in an extension of battery longevity. Therefore, the effect of high versus standard impedance ventricular leads on generator longevity was studied. In 40 patients (21 women, age 73 +/- 13 years) with a standard dual chamber pacemaker indication, a bipolar standard impedance ventricular lead was implanted in 20 patients, the remaining patients received a bipolar high impedance lead in a randomized fashion. All patients received identical pacemaker generators and atrial leads. The estimated longevity of the generator was calculated automatically by a programmed pacemaker algorithm. After a mean follow-up of 39 +/- 4.8 months, no significant differences were observed with respect to mean pacing and sensing thresholds of the atrial and ventricular leads in both groups. However, the high impedance leads displayed a significantly higher impedance and a significantly lower current drain as compared to standard impedance leads (1,044 +/- 139 vs 585 +/- 90 Omega, and 2.2 +/- 0.4 vs 4.3 +/- 1.1 mA). The extrapolated generator longevity was significantly longer in the high impedance lead group, as compared to the standard impedance lead group (107.3 +/- 8.5 vs 97.6 +/- 9.0 months; P = 0.02). In conclusion, implantation of a high impedance lead for ventricular pacing results in a clinically relevant extension of generator longevity.

Effect of modern pacing algorithms on generator longevity: a predictive analysis

Pulse generator (PG) longevity is of major importance to the quality of care of pacemaker patients. A series of automatic algorithms affect PG longevity. This study investigated the individual and combined effects of three algorithms incorporated in the Medtronic Kappa 700 pacemaker series: Capture Management periodically measures the stimulation threshold and adjusts the PG output, Sinus Preference allows the sinus rate to prevail in a specified range below the sensor rate, and Search AV allows an extension of the AV interval if spontaneous conduction is observed. The effects of Capture Management, Sinus Preference, and Search AV on device longevity were studied in 21 consecutive patients treated in the VDD and DDDR modes. Patients were followed for 1 year. The data were analyzed using an equation provided by the manufacturer. Capture Management was activated in 20 patients. For 11 PGs at the basic settings, longevity was extended by 5.2%, whereas reprogrammed PGs had no gain. Sinus Preference was active in four DDDR patients, who gained 12.0 +/- 5.3%atrial sensing from it, with a resultant longevity gain of1.4 +/- 0.45 months(NS). Search AV was active in 19 patients and 8 responders gained 7.8 +/- 4.4 months PG longevity. The overall longevity in this study was 106.3 +/- 8.4 months with all features as programmed, whereas the longevity without Capture Management and Search AV algorithms would be 98.2 +/- 4.9 months, saving 8.1 +/- 5.8 months(range 0-18) of battery life. Thus, two algorithms: Capture Management and Search AV, have clinical relevance in the extension of PG longevity.

Microdislodgment: a likely mechanism of pacing failure with high impedence small area electrodes

High impedance tined steroid-eluting leads, Medtronic CapSure Z family, incorporating a small surface (1.2 mm2) electrode made of porous platinum material are designed to reduce battery current drain. However, in some prior studies, an increased incidence of microdislodgment with this lead was reported thought to be due to the reduced electrode surface area. This article reports the experience that ventricular pacing failure due to microdislodgment occurred after CapSure Z lead implantation and the previous literature is reviewed. (

A systematic approach to pacemaker assessment

Despite the increasing use of pacemaker therapy, assessment of pacemaker function and electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation continue to challenge even experienced critical care nurses. Accurate assessment of pacemaker function is essential in the evaluation of patients, especially patients with symptoms that may be related to pacemaker malfunction such as syncope or palpitations. This article will review pacing concepts and pacing system components. A systematic approach to ECG interpretation will be presented that can be used in a variety of clinical settings.

Cardiac pacing leads

Many of the advances that have been seen in the last decade concerning the functionality, size, and longevity of cardiac pacemakers have been dependent upon concomitant advances in cardiac pacing leads. The most difficult component of a pacing lead to develop has been the insulator. There are many choices for physicians implanting pacing leads: active versus passive fixation, standard impedance versus high impedance and polyurethane versus silicone. The current state of affairs of cardiac pacing leads is quite good in that we have leads that have excellent electrical properties and appear to be more resistant to the hostile environment into which the lead is placed. In spite of this, the goal of a perfect lead remains elusive and there continues to be many challenges in lead design.