The acute effects of biatrial pacing on atrial depolarization and repolarization

Cardiac hemodynamics and proinflammatory cytokines during biatrial and right atrial appendage pacing in patients with interatrial block

Purpose

Interatrial block (IAB) frequently coexists with sinus node disease and is considered a risk factor of left atrial dysfunction, atrial arrhythmias, and heart failure development. Conventional right atrial appendage (RAA) pacing impairs intra- and interatrial conductions and consequently prolongs P wave duration. Biatrial (BiA) pacing helps correct IAB, but its advantageous influence remains controversial. The aim of the study was to compare the effects of BiA and RAA pacing on cardiac hemodynamics and serum concentrations of inflammatory markers and neuropeptides.

Methods

Twenty-eight patients with IAB and preserved atrio-ventricular conduction treated with BiA pacing were studied. Standard invasive hemodynamic measurements were performed during BiA and RAA pacings. Furthermore, the influence of 1 week of BiA and RAA pacing on neuropeptides: atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and markers of inflammation: high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), interleukin 6 (IL-6), and neopterin was examined.

Results

BiA pacing resulted in significant increase of cardiac output (CO) and reduction of pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. We demonstrated significantly lower concentrations of ANP, hs-CRP, IL-6, and neopterin after 1 week of BiA in comparison to RAA pacing. BNP levels remained unchanged.

Conclusions

BiA pacing in comparison to RAA pacing improves hemodynamic performance in patients with IAB and preserved atrio-ventricular conduction. BiA pacing is associated with reduction of ANP and markers of inflammation (hs-CRP, IL-6, and neopterin).

P-wave dispersion: a novel predictor of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

The prolongation of intraatrial and interatrial conduction time and the inhomogeneous propagation of sinus impulses are well known electrophysiologic characteristics in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Previous studies have demonstrated that individuals with a clinical history of paroxysmal AF show a significantly increased P-wave duration in 12-lead surface electrocardiograms (ECG) and signal-averaged ECG recordings.

METHODS

The inhomogeneous and discontinuous atrial conduction in patients with paroxysmal AF has recently been studied with a new ECG index, P-wave dispersion. P-wave dispersion is defined as the difference between the longest and the shortest P-wave duration recorded from multiple different surface ECG leads. Up to now the most extensive clinical evaluation of P-wave dispersion has been performed in the assessment of the risk for AF in patients without apparent heart disease, in hypertensives, in patients with coronary artery disease and in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. P-wave dispersion has proven to be a sensitive and specific ECG predictor of AF in the various clinical settings. However, no electrophysiologic study has proven up to now the suspected relationship between the dispersion in the atrial conduction times and P-wave dispersion. The methodology used for the calculation of P-wave dispersion is not standardized and more efforts to improve the reliability and reproducibility of P-wave dispersion measurements are needed.

CONCLUSIONS

P-wave dispersion constitutes a recent contribution to the field of noninvasive electrocardiology and seems to be quite promising in the field of AF prediction.

Assessment of Atrial Regional Wall Motion Using Strain Doppler Imaging During Biatrial Pacing in the Bradycardia-Tachycardia Syndrome

INTRODUCTION

Biatrial pacing is expected to have preventive effects on atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

We evaluated atrial regional wall motion by strain Doppler imaging (SDI) in 6 patients (62.5 +/- 11.3 [SD] years), who suffered from atrial fibrillation, with an implanted biatrial pacemaker. SDI was performed and atrial regional wall motion was estimated during biatrial (BiA) and right atrial appendage (RAA) pacing.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the interval from the pacing spike to the peak strain of the atrium in the lateral right atrium (LRA) between BiA and RAA pacing. However, there was a significant difference in the septal atrium (SA) between BiA and RAA pacing (225.0 +/- 19.9 vs 267.2 +/- 15.7 ms, P < 0.0001) and in the lateral left atrium (LLA) between BiA and RAA pacing (216.7 +/- 21.6 vs 275.0 +/- 16.2 ms, P < 0.0001). There were significant differences in the time difference of peak strain between BiA and RAA pacing in each atrial segment (LRA-AS: 2.2 +/- 5.9 vs 45.0 +/- 11.9 ms, P = 0.0016, SA-LLA: -8.3 +/- 5.5 vs 7.8 +/- 2.7 ms, P < 0.0011, LRA-LLA: -6.1 +/- 3.9 vs 52.8 +/- 13.2 ms, P = 0.0002). There was no significant difference in the interval from the pacing spike to the inflection point of atrial strain (S-I) of LRA. However, there were significant differences in S-I of SA (83.9 +/- 24.1 vs 129.9 +/- 30.6 ms, P = 0.0086) and LLA (102.2 +/- 37.9 vs 166.1 +/- 13.4 ms, P = 0.0028).

CONCLUSION

BiA pacing improved the synchronicity of regional wall motion of both atrium.

Beneficial effects of biatrial pacing on cardiac function in patients with bradycardia -- tachycardia syndrome

BACKGROUND

Biatrial (BiA) pacing prevents atrial fibrillation. By an unknown mechanism. The purpose of this study was to use Doppler echocardiography to evaluate the hemodynamic effects during BiA pacing.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The subjects were 7 patients with bradycardia - tachycardia syndrome with an implanted pacemaker. Atrial pacing sites were the right atrial appendage (RAA) and coronary sinus. P wave duration during BiA pacing (123 +/-16 ms) was significantly shorter than during either RAA pacing (167+/-19 ms, p<0.05) or sinus rhythm (148+/-12 ms, p<0.05). Doppler echocardiography revealed a greater cardiac output during BiA pacing than during RAA pacing (4.1+/-1.1 vs 3.5+/-0.7 L/min, p=0.042). The Doppler waveform of transmitral flow indicated that the left ventricular contraction interrupted the atrial filling wave during RAA pacing. The interval between the end of the atrial filling wave of transmitral flow and the mitral valvular closing sound was significantly increased by BiA pacing compared with RAA pacing (56+/-65 vs 40+/-57 ms, p=0.047).

CONCLUSION

Cardiac hemodynamics were improved by BiA pacing and reduction of left atrial load may be one of the mechanisms.

Acute Hemodynamic Benefits of Bi-Atrial Atrioventricular Sequential Pacing With the Optimal Atrioventricular Delay

OBJECTIVES

We evaluate the acute effects on hemodynamics of bi-atrial (BiA) pacing with the optimal atrioventricular (AV) delays, in comparison with high right atrial (HRA) pacing and coronary sinus (CS) pacing.

BACKGROUND

Bi-atrial pacing has been suggested as one of the alternative therapy for preventing the recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF). There are, however, few reports on the hemodynamic effects of BiA pacing, and the results that exist are controversial.

METHODS

Twenty patients were paced from HRA, left lateral site of CS, and both sites with the optimal AV delays at 80 and 100 beats/min, in random order. After 5-min pacing, maximal P-wave duration in a 12-lead electrocardiogram, cardiac output (CO), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), and the transmitral flow pattern by transthoracic echocardiography were measured.

RESULTS

Compared with HRA and CS pacing, BiA pacing delivered the shortest P-wave duration (HRA: 130 +/- 14 ms, CS: 132 +/- 19 ms, and BiA: 94 +/- 8 ms, respectively, p < 0.001) and the most improvement in CO and PCWP (HRA: 3.63 +/- 0.67 l/min and 9.2 +/- 4.3 mm Hg, CS: 3.71 +/- 0.70 l/min and 8.8 +/- 3.4 mmHg, and BiA: 3.88 +/- 0.63 l/min and 8.0 +/- 3.1 mmHg, respectively, p < 0.01). Bi-atrial pacing also significantly increased the mitral flow time velocity integral and peak A-wave velocity by transthoracic echocardiography, compared with HRA and CS pacing (HRA: 7.6 +/- 1.4 cm and 68.8 +/- 12.2 cm/s, CS: 7.8 +/- 1.4 cm and 70.5 +/- 14.5 cm/s, and BiA: 8.2 +/- 1.2 cm and 76.3 +/- 14.2 cm/s, respectively, p < 0.01). Bi-atrial pacing most significantly decreased the intervals between the atrial pacing spike and the peak of A-wave (HRA: 180 +/- 28 ms, CS: 165 +/- 21 ms, and BiA: 157 +/- 19 ms, respectively, p < 0.01). These improvements in hemodynamics significantly correlated with interatrial conduction delay.

CONCLUSIONS

Bi-atrial pacing made the most significant improvements of hemodynamics. These benefits may be due to the improvements in interatrial conduction delay and atrial dyssynchrony.

Acute haemodynamic benefits of biatrial atrioventricular sequential pacing: comparison with single atrial atrioventricular sequential pacing

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the acute effects on haemodynamic variables of biatrial pacing in comparison with high right atrial (HRA) pacing and left lateral atrial pacing.

PATIENTS AND DESIGN

23 patients were paced from the HRA site, the lateral site of the coronary sinus (CS), and both sites on two fixed atrioventricular delays (100 and 150 ms) during atrioventricular sequential pacing at 80 and 100 beats/min in random order.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

After five minute pacing, the maximum P wave duration on a 12 lead ECG, cardiac output, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, and the transmitral flow pattern by transthoracic echocardiography were measured.

RESULTS

Biatrial pacing delivered the shortest P wave duration (133 (25) ms, 133 (27) ms, and 96 (15) ms during HRA, CS, and biatrial pacing, respectively; p < 0.001), and the most improvement in cardiac output and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (3.71 (0.93) l/min and 15 (7) mm Hg, 3.79 (0.97) l/min, and 14 (6) mm Hg, and 4.09 (1.01) l/min and 13(6) mm Hg during HRA, CS, and biatrial pacing, respectively; p < 0.01). Biatrial pacing most significantly decreased the intervals between the atrial pacing spike and the peak and end of the atrial filling wave (186 (16) ms and 250 (22) ms, 172 (19) ms and 242 (24) ms, and 153 (15) ms and 227 (23) ms during HRA, CS, and biatrial pacing, respectively; p < 0.001). It also significantly increased the mitral flow time velocity integral and peak atrial filling wave velocity (7.5 (3.4) cm and 63.8 (17.6) cm/s, 7.8 (3.0) cm and 62.4 (16.6) cm/s, and 8.3 (3.4) cm and 67.8 (19.3) cm/s during HRA, CS, and biatrial pacing, respectively; p < 0.05). The improvements in haemodynamic variables were especially remarkable in patients who had a longer interatrial conduction delay.

CONCLUSIONS

Biatrial pacing yielded the most significant improvements in haemodynamic variables. These haemodynamic benefits may play a part in reducing intra-atrial pressure and preventing atrial fibrillation.

The results of pacing trials for the prevention and termination of atrial tachyarrhythmias: is there any evidence of therapeutic breakthrough?

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is now recognized as the most prevalent sustained cardiac arrhythmia and it is associated with considerable mortality and morbidity. The demand for effective therapeutic strategies for AF has always been high and is anticipated to further increase. Anticoagulation and pharmacologic antiarrhythmic therapy or radiofrequency catheter ablation remain the mainstay of treatment for AF. Among the wide range of nonpharmacologic options which are presently being investigated, only ablation in or around the pulmonary veins and the surgical maze procedure have been shown to accomplish the aim of the curative treatment of the arrhythmia. Preventative atrial pacing and antitachycardia pacing may offer an attractive alternative option for the management of AF by either eliminating the triggers and/or by modifying the substrate of the arrhythmia. The results of several recent trials have shown a significant increase in the time to first AF recurrence, a decrease in atrial conduction time, and a trend towards reduction in AF burden, suggesting that atrial pacing may prevent AF due to improved synchronization of atrial depolarization. The recognition of potential triggers of AF, such as atrial premature complexes, short-long sequence, and bradycardia, has encouraged the development of novel atrial pacing algorithms designed to prevent the initiation of the arrhythmia on an individual basis. Observations of AF often starting with regular atrial activity consistent with atrial tachycardia have supported the hypothesis that early antitachycardia pacing may prevent progression to AF. The concept of "hybrid therapy" based on the combination of several different therapeutic strategies suggests that antitachycardia pacing therapy, integrated with an atrial defibrillator and preventative atrial pacing modes, may act synergistically to prevent AF. Dual chamber cardioverter-defibrillators with capacity to prevent and interrupt AF may offer more comprehensive and successful treatment for patients with advanced heart disease, frequent paroxysms of AF, and the risk of proarrhythmia.

Can simple Doppler measurements estimate interatrial conduction time?

Prolongation of the interatrial conduction time (ia-CT) is considered an important factor in the pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation (AF) and as a criterion to perform multisite atrial pacing. Measurement of ia-CT requires an electrophysiologic study. The aim of this study was to compare echocardiographic with electrophysiologic measurements to determine if they are correlated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study included 32 consecutive patients who underwent electrophysiologic studies. We measured ia-CT between the high right atrium and the distal coronary sinus. In all patients we measured P wave duration, left atrial diameter and area, and ia-CT by Doppler echocardiography was measured as the difference in time intervals between the QRS onset and the tricuspid A wave, and the QRS onset and the mitral A wave (DT). Ia-CT was statistically correlated with DT (r = 0.79, P < 0.0001), but not with P wave duration or left atrial dimensions.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurement DT may be reliable to estimate ia-CT without invasive procedure. Accordingly, DT could be used as a simple selection criterion when considering patients for atrial resynchronization therapy.

Atrial pacing for the prevention and termination of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) affects about 2% of the general population and 8%-11% of those older than 65 years. The demand for effective therapeutic strategies for AF is anticipated to increase substantially as the proportion of the elderly population increases. Atrioventricular nodal ablation accompanied by permanent pacemaker implantation is an established option in elderly patients with intractable arrhythmia and poor ventricular rate control. However, it renders most patients pacemaker dependent and does not eliminate symptoms associated with loss of atrial transport or reduce the risk of stroke. The considerable limitations of rhythm or rate control strategies prompted interest in preventative atrial pacing, which may reduce the incidence of AF by either eliminating the triggers and/or by modifying the substrate of AF. Atrial or dual-chamber pacing has been proven to prevent or delay progression to permanent AF in elderly patients with sinus node dysfunction as compared with ventricular pacing. Patients with advanced atrial conduction delay may benefit from atrial resynchronization pacing. There may be additional benefits associated with the use of particular sites of pacing, specific pacing algorithms designed to target potential triggers of AF, and pace-termination of atrial tachycardia. Preventive and antitachycardia pacing algorithms incorporated in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and pacemakers are currently under investigation and may offer a valuable alternative to antiarrhythmic drug therapy in elderly patients with left ventricular dysfunction at high risk of proarrhythmia or worsening heart failure. The evolution of hybrid therapy, in which two or more different strategies are employed in the same patient, may be the most effective approach to management of AF.