Cardiac Resynchronization after Left Ventricular Lead Extraction: Usefulness of Angioplasty in Coronary Sinus Stenosis

Successful coronary sinus left ventricular lead extraction 9 years postimplantation using the wire ThRoUgh Snare Twice (wire TRUST) technique

The newly-proposed tandem approach, Wire ThRoUgh Snare Twice (Wire TRUST) is effective for grasping a lead with inaccessible ends. This case report shows that Wire TRUST can also enable successful extraction of a left ventricular lead by iteratively grasping and repositioning to the distal portion of the lead.

Coronary venous angioplasty to facilitate transvenous left ventricular lead placement: A single-center 13-year experience

BACKGROUND

Barriers to successful left ventricular lead placement within the coronary venous anatomy may include focal stenoses, thromboses, phrenic nerve stimulation, vessel tortuosity, small vessel caliber, nonexcitable tissue, and valve presence. A large series describing the utilization of coronary venous angioplasty (CVAP) for relief of these issues is absent in the literature.

OBJECTIVE

We report our experience on all patients treated with CVAP in a single-center 13-year experience.

METHODS

Forty-seven patients with CVAP (64% male, mean age 67 ± 12 years) were treated by five different implanting physicians for approved cardiac resynchronization therapy indications. The reason for CVAP was categorized by obstacle (focal occlusion, valve presence, small caliber vessel) and location. The number, type, and size of balloon used, inflation characteristics, complications, and success of lead deployment crossing the point of intervention were all tabulated.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven percent of patients (36/47) had successful CVAP. The most common reason for intervention was a focal occlusion (24/47; 51%), followed by valve presence (13/47; 28%), and small vessel caliber (10/47; 21%). Focal occlusions were most successfully managed with CVAP (23/24; 96%), followed by small vessel caliber (7/10; 70%) and valve presence (6/13; 46%). The reason for failure was most commonly due to failure to relieve the obstruction (5/11; 45%), thrombosis (3/11; 27.3%), dissection (2/11; 18.2%), and inability to pass the balloon through the occlusion (1/11; 9.0%). There were no significant complications developed from CVAP utilization.

CONCLUSION

In a large analysis, CVAP can be safely and successfully performed in the majority of instances required.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy after coronary sinus lead extraction: feasibility and mid-term outcome of transvenous reimplantation in a tertiary referral centre

AIMS

Few data are available on cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) after coronary sinus (CS) lead extraction. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and mid-term outcome of transvenous CS lead reimplantation in a tertiary referral centre.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We enrolled all patients who were referred to our hospital for CS lead removal from December 2000 through to May 2009 and were transvenously reimplanted with a CRT system before June 2009. One-year follow-up was performed to evaluate the incidence of infections, malfunctions, and mortality. We studied 113 consecutive patients undergoing successful CS lead extraction; 90 patients (75 male, mean age 69.2, range 35-84) underwent CS lead reimplantation (success rate: 95.6%; right-sided approach: 64.4%). In these patients, cardiac device infection was the usual indication for extraction (74.4%) and the subsequent reimplantation was performed after a median time of 3 days. The coronary sinus lead was usually positioned in the left ventricular (LV) postero-lateral region (62.2%); two procedures were required in two cases (2.2%). Balloon angioplasty was necessary for two patients (failure in one), whereas for the others we used a conventional implant technique. During follow-up, we observed four cases (4.4%) of local infection and six cases (6.7%) of system malfunction, requiring reintervention (two cases during the same hospitalization). One-year mortality was 5.5%.

CONCLUSION

Left ventricular lead reimplantation is in our experience an effective and safe procedure, also in the case of right-sided approach. During follow-up, 1-year mortality was particularly low, whereas overall infection rate was higher than first implant procedures.

Coronary venous lead implantation after an evaluation by virtual histology intravascular ultrasound and stenting of a stenosis

We describe a patient who developed coronary vein (CV) stenosis shortly (<3 months) after an initial left ventricular (LV) lead implantation with significant fibrous tissue. The virtual histological intravascular ultrasound analysis was useful for characterizing the plaque component of the stenotic lesion and formulating the strategy. A summarized review of the CV angioplasty for LV lead implantations disclosed that CV stenosis was often found in patients who had a previous history of cardiac surgery or an LV lead implantation and that a stent implantation was required to deploy the LV lead in the targeted CV in some (9.3%) patients.