Benefits and lessons learned from stored electrogram information in implantable defibrillators

Cardiac device troubleshooting in the intensive care unit: an educational review

Numerous patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device are admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit (ICU). When taking care of these patients, it is essential to have basic knowledge of potential device problems and how they could be tackled. This review summarizes common issues with pacemakers, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization devices and provides a framework for troubleshooting in the ICU. In addition, specific aspects of intensive care that might interfere with cardiac devices are discussed.

The role and outcomes of new supraventricular tachycardia among patients with mild heart failure

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to assess the predictors of new supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) and the association of new SVT with subsequent clinical outcomes among mild heart failure (HF) patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study population comprised patients enrolled in MADIT-CRT, after exclusion of patients with atrial arrhythmias before enrollment (N = 325). Multivariate analysis was used to identify predictors of new-onset SVT and the association of time-dependent development of SVT with subsequent ventricular tachyarrhythmic events (VTEs), HF-hospitalizations, and death. SVT burden was categorized into three groups based on the number of episodes per patient; (a) Low <10, (b) Intermediate ≥10 but <20, and (c) High ≥20. During mean follow up of 3.4 ± 1.1 years, 41(3%) subjects developed new SVT. African American race, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) >80 mmHg and prior non sustained ventricular arrhythmia were independent predictors for SVT. Multivariate analysis showed that the development of time-dependent SVT was associated with a >4-fold increased risk for VTEs (HR = 4.3; 95% CI: 1.6-11.7; P = .004) and with a >6-fold increased risk for all-cause mortality (HR = 6.5; 95% CI: 2.3-18.7; P < .001), but not with HF hospitalizations (HR = 2.2; 95% CI: 0.7-7.2; P = .17). Intermediate, and high SVT-burden were each independent risk factors for death when compared with Low burden (HR = 9.1; P = .03, and HR = 19.4; P < .001; respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with mild HF, the development of new-onset SVT after device implantation is related to distinct baseline clinical and epidemiologic characteristics and is associated with a significant increase in subsequent adverse outcomes, including VTEs and death.

Predictors and outcomes of atrial tachyarrhythmia among patients with implantable defibrillators

BACKGROUND

Atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATAs) are common among heart failure (HF) patients.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess predictors for the development of new ATA and its components (atrial fibrillation/flutter [AF], supraventricular tachycardia [SVT]), and their association with subsequent clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We assessed predictors for first and recurrent ATA, AF, and SVT among 1500 patients in MADIT-RIT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Reduce Inappropriate Therapy). We also investigated the association of new ATA, AF, or SVT with subsequent ventricular arrhythmia (VA), adverse events (HF hospitalization, syncope, or death), or death by time-dependent analysis.

RESULTS

During 17 months of follow-up, 286 patients (19%) developed new ATA, of whom 92 (6%) had AF and 194 (12%) had SVT. Younger age (≤65 years), diastolic blood pressure ≥72 mm Hg, heart rate ≥63 bpm, absence of diabetes, and prior atrial arrhythmia were independent predictors of ATA. Prior atrial arrhythmia was the only predictor of AF (hazard ratio 3.14; P <.001). New ATA was associated with significantly increased risk for subsequent VA (HR 2.12; P <.001), increased adverse events (HR 1.42; P <.001), and death (HR 1.85; P = .038). New AF and new SVT were both independently associated with >2-fold increased risk for the development of subsequent VA (HR 2.21; P = .012l and HR 2.15; P <.001, respectively) and adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Among MADIT-RIT patients, younger age, absence of diabetes, higher blood pressure, higher heart rate, and prior atrial arrhythmia predicted device-detected ATA. Both AF and SVT were associated with increased risk for subsequent VA and adverse events. Aggressive management should be considered in HF patients who develop new-onset, device-detected ATA to improve clinical outcomes.

Usefulness of heart rate to predict one-year mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation and acute myocardial infarction (from the OMEGA trial)

In the setting of acute myocardial infarction and sinus rhythm, the heart rate (HR) has been demonstrated to correlate closely with mortality. In patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction and atrial fibrillation (AF) on admission, however, the prognostic relevance of the HR has not yet been systematically addressed. A post hoc subgroup analysis of the data from the OMEGA trial was conducted to analyze whether the admission HR determines the 1-year mortality in patients presenting with AF in the setting of acute myocardial infarction. Of 3,851 patients enrolled in the OMEGA study, 211 (6%) presented with AF on admission. This subgroup was dichotomized according to the admission HR (cutoff 95 beats/min). Multiple regression analysis revealed that an admission HR of ≥95 beats/min independently determined the 1-year mortality in patients with AF (odds ratio 4.69, 95% confidence interval 1.47 to 15.01; p = 0.01). In conclusion, this is the first study demonstrating that a high HR (≥95 beats/min) on admission in patients with AF and acute myocardial infarction is associated with an almost fivefold mortality risk.

Remote monitoring of implantable-cardioverter defibrillators: results from the Reliability of IEGM Online Interpretation (RIONI) study

AIMS

Intracardiac electrograms (IEGMs) recorded by implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are essential for arrhythmia diagnosis and ICD therapy assessment. Short IEGM snapshots showing 3-10 s before arrhythmia detection were added to the Biotronik Home Monitoring system in 2005 as the first-generation IEGM Online. The RIONI study tested the primary hypothesis that experts' ratings regarding the appropriateness of ICD therapy based on IEGM Online and on standard 30 s IEGM differ in <10% of arrhythmia events.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 619 ICD patients were enrolled and followed for 1 year. According to a predefined procedure, 210 events recorded by the ICDs were selected for evaluation. Three expert board members rated the appropriateness of ICD therapy and classified the underlying arrhythmia using coded IEGM Online and standard IEGM to avoid bias. The average duration of IEGM Online was 4.4±1.5 s. According to standard IEGM, the underlying arrhythmia was ventricular in 135 episodes (64.3%), supraventricular in 53 episodes (25.2%), oversensing in 17 episodes (8.1%), and uncertain in 5 episodes (2.4%). The expert board's rating diverged between determinable IEGM Online tracings and standard IEGM in 4.6% of episodes regarding the appropriateness of ICD therapy (95% CI up to 8.0%) and in 6.6% of episodes regarding arrhythmia classification (95% CI up to 10.5%).

CONCLUSION

By enabling accurate evaluation of the appropriateness of ICD therapy and the underlying arrhythmia, the first-generation IEGM Online provided a clinically effective basis for timely interventions and for optimized patient management schemes, which was comparable with current IEGM recordings.

Inappropriate Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy

Although improvements in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy have taken place, many challenges do remain. Inappropriate delivery of therapy is a big problem that impacts the quality of life of ICD recipients. Although there is now a clear understanding that atrial arrhythmias are the main cause of inappropriate ICD therapies, physicians have not been very successful in preventing them. Additionally, although many tachycardia detection discriminators have been shown to be helpful, it is not clear that there is a particular combination that is ideal for all patients. Until such an algorithm is developed (which may not be possible), a detailed knowledge and use of all available programming options, guided by special characteristics of each unique patient, are the only foreseeable solutions. Finally, one must face the prospect that this problem cannot be vanquished, but only ameliorated.

Mechanisms of ventricular fibrillation initiation in MADIT II patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators

BACKGROUND

The availability of stored intracardiac electrograms from implantable defibrillators (ICDs) has facilitated the study of the mechanisms of ventricular tachyarrhythmia onset. This study aimed to determine the patterns of initiation of ventricular fibrillation (VF) in Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT) II patients along with associated electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters and clinical characteristics.

METHODS

Examination of stored electrograms enabled us to evaluate the rhythm preceding each episode of VF and to calculate (intracardiac) ECG parameters including QT, QT peak (QTp), coupling interval, and prematurity index.

RESULTS

Sixty episodes of VF among 29 patients (mean age 64.4 +/- 2.5 years) were identified. A single ventricular premature complex (VPC) initiated 46 (77%) episodes whereas a short-long-short (SLS) sequence accounted for 14 (23%) episodes. Of the 29 patients studied, 23 patients had VF episodes preceded by a VPC only, two patients with SLS only, and four patients with both VPC and SLS-initiated episodes. There were no significant differences between initiation patterns in regards to the measured ECG parameters; a faster heart rate with SLS initiation (mean RR prior to VF of 655 +/- 104 ms for SLS and 744 +/- 222 ms for VPC) approached significance (P = 0.06). The two patients with SLS only were not on beta-blockers compared to 83% of the VPC patients.

CONCLUSION

Ventricular fibrillation is more commonly initiated by a VPC than by a SLS sequence among the MADIT II population. Current pacing modes designed to prevent bradycardia and pause-dependent arrhythmias are unlikely to decrease the incidence of VPC-initiated episodes of VF.

Persistent atrial fibrillation is associated with appropriate shocks and heart failure in patients with left ventricular dysfunction treated with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator

AIM

The objective of this study was to investigate whether persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) and new-onset AF are associated with appropriate shocks, cardiovascular mortality, chronic heart failure (CHF), and inappropriate shocks in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients with left ventricular dysfunction.

METHODS

We included 290 consecutive ICD patients with a documented left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 0.35 and compared outcomes between patients without AF (n = 207), those with persistent AF (n = 64), and those with new-onset AF (n = 19).

RESULTS

The patients with persistent AF were older, more frequently had valve disease and cardiac surgery, and less frequently had coronary artery disease as compared with the patients without AF. Patients with persistent AF had a higher New York Heart Association class, however, left ventricular ejection fraction rates between these 2 groups were comparable (0.28 +/- 0.07 vs 0.29 +/- 0.08, P = not significant). No difference was found between patients with new-onset AF and those without AF. During follow-up (2.6 +/- 1.9 years), more patients with persistent AF received appropriate ICD shocks as compared with those without AF (24 [38%] vs 49 [24%], P = .04). Deterioration of CHF occurred more often in patients with persistent AF (19 [30%], P = .001) and those with new-onset AF (9 [47%], P < .001) as compared with patients without AF (31 [14%]). Multivariate analysis revealed that patients with persistent AF had an increased risk for appropriate ICD shocks (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.9, 95% CI 1.2-3.2, P = .009). Persistent AF (adjusted HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.1-3.9, P = .03) and new-onset AF (adjusted HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.1-5.7, P = .02) were found to be independent risk indicators of CHF deterioration.

CONCLUSIONS

In ICD patients with left ventricular dysfunction, persistent AF is associated with appropriate ICD shocks and deterioration of CHF. New-onset AF is related to deterioration of CHF.

Effects of a rate smoothing algorithm for prevention of ventricular arrhythmias: Results of the Ventricular Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (VAST)

BACKGROUND

Rate smoothing, which is available in some pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), has been used to prevent Torsades de Pointes in patients with long QT syndrome. Its efficacy in general ventricular arrhythmia prevention has not been determined.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the Ventricular Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (VAST) was to prospectively investigate whether rate smoothing could significantly reduce the incidence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in a large, broad population of patients with ICDs.

METHODS

Five hundred sixty-nine patients were enrolled at 57 participating centers and implanted with a commercially available Guidant ICD. A single-blinded crossover design was used in which each patient was randomized at implant to one of two treatment sequences: either rate smoothing on (RS On) followed by rate smoothing off (RS Off), or RS Off followed by RS On. This mode sequence was randomly determined and assigned in a 1:1 fashion using randomized permuted blocks by site. Each mode was followed for 6 months. Programming of rate smoothing was prescribed as 12% Down and 12% Up for the duration of the RS On period.

RESULTS

Of enrolled patients, 281 were randomized to RS Off followed by RS On, and 288 to RS On followed by RS Off. With RS On, 75 (23%) patients experienced a reduction in arrhythmias, 76 (23%) saw an increase in arrhythmias, and the remaining 176 (54%) had no difference. No significant difference (P = .58) in frequency of arrhythmias with RS On vs RS Off was found.

CONCLUSION

Rate smoothing does not result in a reduction in ventricular arrhythmias in a heterogeneous population of patients receiving ICDs.

The RIONI study rationale and design: validation of the first stored electrograms transmitted via home monitoring in patients with implantable defibrillators

Appropriate and inappropriate therapies of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) have a major impact on morbidity and quality of life in ICD recipients. The recently introduced home monitoring of ICD devices is a promising new technique which remotely offers information about the status of the system. Stored intracardiac electrograms (IEGMs), which are essential for correct classification of appropriate and inappropriate ICD discharges, have until now not been available with ICD home monitoring on a day-by-day basis because of limitations of transferable data. We demonstrate the first compressed IEGMs daily transferable via home monitoring (IEGM-online). Validation of these electrograms will be performed in the Reliability of IEGM-Online Interpretation (RIONI) study. A total of 210 episodes of stored IEGMs will be collected by at least 12 European centres. The primary endpoint of this study is to investigate whether the IEGM-online based evaluation of the appropriateness of the ICDs therapeutic decision following episode detection is equivalent to the evaluation based on the complete ICD episode Holter extracted from the IEGM stored. The evaluation is independently done by an expert board of three experienced ICD investigators. The equivalence of the two methods is accepted if the evaluations yield a different conclusion for <10% of all evaluated IEGMs. The conclusion of the study is expected at the beginning of 2007. If RIONI successfully validates IEGMs transmitted via home monitoring, a strong basis for the use of this promising technique will be established.

Supraventricular arrhythmias limit effective cardiac resynchronization therapy: Diagnosis using intracardiac electrograms and device based pacing maneuvers

Cardiac resynchronization therapy is an effective tool for the treatment of drug-refractory heart failure in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and inter/intra ventricular conduction delay. Supraventricular tachycardias may prevent effect delivery of this therapy. We report three cases in which effective therapy was limited by asymptomatic supraventricular tachycardia. Diagnostic pacing maneuvers were performed via the implanted device to determine the underlying arrhythmia mechanism. These cases highlight the importance of (1) treating supraventricular tachycardias before and after implantation of cardiac devices and (2) using device based programmed stimulation to diagnose the mechanism of supraventricular tachycardias.

The DATAS rationale and design: a controlled, randomized trial to assess the clinical benefit of dual chamber (DDED) defibrillator

Single chamber (SC) implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) have several limitations that might be relevant during follow-up, like atrial pacing requirements, inadequate therapies, sustained atrial tachyarrhythmias and difficulties to achieve an accurate diagnosis of the arrhythmia. Dual chamber (DC) ICDs offer an attractive and rational solution, although controversy remains if the costs and complexity of these devices offer a real clinical advantage. The Dual Chamber & Atrial Tachyarrhythmias Adverse Events Study (DATAS) was designed to analyze the ability of DC ICD, DDED, to reduce clinically significant adverse events compared with SC ICD in a non-selected population with conventional indications for ICD implantation. This is a prospective, multicentre, randomized, open labelled study, with three arms: two of them (simulated SC ICD and true DC ICD) cross-over, and the third (true SC ICD) parallels the other two. The composite primary end point comprises four Clinically Significant Adverse Events (CSAE): (1) all-cause mortality, (2) invasive intervention, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization due to cardiovascular cause, (3) inappropriate shocks, and (4) sustained symptomatic atrial tachyarrhythmias that (a) require urgent termination or (b) last more than 48h leading to therapeutic intervention. Secondary end points constitute each of the individual components of CSAE, cardiovascular status, quality of life and a detailed analysis of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. To date (June 2003) there have been 343 patients enroled from 947 screened patients. The projected enrollment includes 360 patients and the conclusion of the study is expected at the beginning of 2005.

Prevention of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators-the PREVENT study

BACKGROUND

In patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), 25 to 45% of tachyarrhythmia episodes were initiated by short-long-short RR intervals.

METHODS

The prospective multi-center PREVENT study randomized patients implanted with ICDs capable of atrioventricular pacing, in order to compare-using a cross-over design with two 3-month treatment periods-the benefits of 'rate smoothing' (RS) as a 'pause-prevention algorithm' for the prevention of ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

RESULT

Follow-up included 219 patients with implanted ICDs, of whom 153 were eligible for analysis as per protocol. Fifty-seven of these patients (38%) had documented episodes of ventricular tachyarrhythmias during the six months follow-up. The total number of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia episodes was reduced from 358 with RS Off to 145 with RS On. RS was effective in reducing the number of short-long-short induced sustained ventricular episodes from 100 with RS Off to 40 with RS On. The Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney point estimator equals 0.66 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.51 to 0.82 (relevant superiority; corresponding p = 0.039). There were no proarrhythmic effects due to rate smoothing within the scope of this study.

CONCLUSIONS

'Rate smoothing' significantly reduced sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias in ICD patients. There is a relevant superiority of the treatment during the early six months of follow-up.

An adaptive interval-based algorithm for withholding ICD therapy during sinus tachycardia

Avoiding inappropriate ICD therapy during supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) while assuring 100% sensitivity for VT/VF remains a challenge. Inappropriate VT/VF therapy during sinus tachycardia (ST) is particularly distressing to the patient because the full sequence of ICD therapies is often delivered. ST or 1:1 atrial tachycardia (AT) with long PR intervals and ST or AT with atrial oversensing of far-field R waves cause the majority of inappropriate therapy in the Medtronic GEM DR (Model 7271) ICD. The goals of the present effort were to define an adaptive interval-based algorithm for withholding VT/VF therapy in dual chamber ICDs during ST and to compare performance of the adaptive algorithm with that of the original ST withholding algorithm in the GEM DR. The adaptive algorithm uses a combination of 1:1 atrial to ventricular conduction pattern, changes in RR intervals and changes in intrinsic PR intervals to establish evidence for or against the presence of ST. Performances of the adaptive and original ST withholding algorithms were compared on 3 databases collected by implanted GEM DR devices. The first database included 684 spontaneous VT/VF episodes. The second database included 216 spontaneous SVT episodes that received inappropriate VT/VF therapy. These databases included up to 2,000 atrial or ventricular sensed or paced events preceding the spontaneous tachycardias. The third database included 320 spontaneous ST/AT episodes for which therapy was appropriately withheld by the GEM DR. Performance of the adaptive algorithm on the third database was predicted rather than directly computed because of record length limitations. VT/VF therapy was classified as "withheld" if evidence of ST remained high for one algorithm (i.e., at least 7 more beats to VT/VF detection) at the point of VT/VF detection by the other algorithm. For the 684 true VT/VF episodes, the original algorithm withheld VT/VF therapy in 5 episodes and the adaptive algorithm withheld VT/VF therapy in 3 episodes. The 95% confidence interval for the difference in VT/VF sensitivity between the adaptive and original algorithms was [-0.5 to + 1.1%]. Twelve of the 320 ST/AT episodes (3.8%) that were appropriately classified by the original algorithm were predicted to receive inappropriate therapy by the adaptive algorithm. However, relative to the original algorithm, the adaptive algorithm appropriately withheld VT/VF therapy for 76 of 216 true SVT episodes (i.e., incremental specificity of 35.2%). For the specific SVT episodes that were the targets for improvement by the adaptive ST algorithm (ST/AT with long PR intervals and ST/AT with intermittent atrial oversensing of far-field R waves), the adaptive algorithm reduced inappropriate therapy by 63.2%.

Heart rate variability before the onset of ventricular tachycardia: differences between slow and fast arrhythmias

BACKGROUND

We tested whether or not heart rate variability (HRV) changes can serve as early signs of ventricular tachycardia (VT) and predict slow and fast VT in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied the ICD stored 1000 beat-to-beat intervals before the onset of VT (131 episodes) and during a control time without VT (74 series) in 63 chronic heart failure ICD patients. Standard HRV parameters as well as two nonlinear parameters, namely 'Polvar10' from symbolic dynamics and the finite time growth rates 'Fitgra9' were calculated. Comparing the control and the VT series, no linear HRV parameter showed a significant difference. The nonlinear parameters detected a significant increase in short phases with low variability before the onset of VT (for time series with less than 10% ectopy, P<0.05). Subdividing VT into fast (cycle length <or=270 ms) and slow (>270 ms) events, we found that the onset of slow VT was characterized by a significant increase in heart rate, whereas fast VT was triggered during decreased heart rates, compared to the control series.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data may permit the development of automatic ICD algorithms based on nonlinear dynamic HRV parameters to predict VT before it starts. Furthermore, they may facilitate improved prevention strategies.

Do atrial tachyarrhythmias beget ventricular tachyarrhythmias in defibrillator recipients?

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to analyze the incidence of "dual tachycardia"-ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) preceded by paroxysmal atrial tachycardia (AT) or atrial fibrillation (AF)-in patients receiving dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs).

BACKGROUND

Paroxysmal AT/AF occurs commonly in patients who receive ICDs for the treatment of life-threatening VT/VF. Although AF is associated with an adverse prognosis in the setting of structural heart disease, the relationship between AT/AF and VT/VF is unclear.

METHODS

We followed 537 patients undergoing implantation of the Jewel AF ICD (Model 7250, Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota) for 11.4 +/- 8.2 months. These included 398 patients with a history of at least two episodes of AT or AF during the preceding year as well as 139 patients enrolled because of VT/VF alone.

RESULTS

There were 233 dual tachycardia episodes in 45 patients during follow-up. Overall, 8.9% of episodes detected as VT/VF were dual tachycardias, and 20.3% of patients with VT/VF had at least one dual tachycardia episode. The median duration of AT/AF preceding the first VT/VF detection was 1.09 h (25% to 75% quartile 0.24 to 33.4 h). When AT/AF continued between two consecutive VT/VF detections, the median interdetection interval was 11 min. When AT/AF terminated either because of a ventricular therapy or spontaneously, the median interdetection interval was prolonged to 71 h (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Dual tachycardia is common in ICD recipients with a history of AT/AF. The duration of AT/AF preceding the first VT/VF detection is < or =1 h about 50% of the time. Termination of the AT/AF significantly delays the time to the next VT/VF detection.

Implantation of cardioverter defibrillators without induction of ventricular fibrillation

BACKGROUND

The upper limit of vulnerability (ULV) is the weakest shock at which ventricular fibrillation (VF) is not induced by a T-wave shock. This study tested the hypothesis that a vulnerability safety margin based on the ULV can be used as an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation criterion.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators were implanted in 80 patients if T-wave shocks did not induce VF and the baseline-rhythm R wave was >/=7 mV. The T-wave shock was 10 J in the first 45 patients (group A) and 15 J in the last 35 patients (group B). After inductionless implantations, the first VF shock was programmed to the T-wave shock plus 5 J. If T-wave shocks induced VF, the ULV was measured and the first shock was programmed to the ULV+5 J. Inductionless implantations were performed in 58 patients (72%), 28 in group A (62%) and 30 in group B (86%; P=0.04). If T-wave scanning had been done at 15 J in group A patients, inductionless implantations could have been performed in 84% of them. At 3 months, VF was induced twice during electrophysiological study in 75 patients (94%). All VFs were detected in </=4.7 s and were terminated by the first shock. During follow-up, 197 of 198 appropriate first shocks for rapid ventricular tachycardia or VF (99%) were successful in patients who had inductionless implantations (95% confidence intervals, 97% to 100%).

CONCLUSION

Inductionless implantations can be performed in >80% of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients using a vulnerability safety margin based on a T-wave scan at 15.

The implantable cardioverter defibrillator

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) have evolved from the treatment of last resort to the gold standard therapy for patients at high risk for ventricular tachyarrhythmias. High-risk patients include those who have survived life-threatening arrhythmias, and individuals with cardiac diseases who are at risk for such arrhythmias, but are symptomless. Use of an ICD will affect the patient's quality of life. Some drugs can substantially affect defibrillator function and efficacy, and possible drug-device interactions should be considered. Patients with ICDs may encounter cell phones, antitheft detectors, and many other sources of potential electromagnetic Interference. In addition to treating ventricular tachyarrhythmias, new defibrillators provide full featured dual chamber pacing, and could treat atrial arrhythmias, and congestive heart failure by means of biventricular pacing.

Current status of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator

Clinical trials have established the superiority of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) over antiarrhythmic drug therapy in survivors of sudden cardiac death and in high-risk patients with coronary artery disease. The ICD has evolved to overcome the limitation of earlier devices that required thoracotomy for implantation and were fraught with inappropriate shock delivery. Current ICDs are implanted in a similar manner to cardiac pacemakers and incorporate sophisticated rhythm-discrimination algorithms to prevent inappropriate therapy. Managing the patient with an ICD requires an understanding of the multiprogrammable features of modern devices. Drug interactions and potential sources of electromagnetic interference may adversely affect ICD function. Driving restrictions may be necessary under certain conditions. The cost-effectiveness of ICD therapy appears favorable, given the marked survival benefit seen in randomized trials relative to antiarrhythmic drug treatment. The growing number of ICD recipients necessitates an understanding of the specialized features of the modern ICD and the role of device therapy in clinical practice.

Implantable cardiac defibrillators

The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) represents an important development in the effort to reduce the incidence of sudden cardiac death (almost 400,000 yearly in the United States). Early generation ICDs, which required epicardial lead systems and abdominal placement of the pulse generator, have been replaced by transvenous leads and pectoral implants. Other important refinements, which include biphasic waveforms, extensive memory capability, antitachycardia pacing, and enhanced sensing algorithms, have greatly improved patient tolerance. Ongoing trials and those in the planning stages will continue to expand the indications for ICDs and will focus on cost-effectiveness.

Hybrid therapy for ventricular arrhythmia management

Optimum arrhythmia management has evolved to couple ICD therapy with catheter ablative and drug therapy to attempt to eliminate or reduce arrhythmia risk. No longer should the clinician approach such therapy as a choice among single alternative strategies only. Optimum patient management includes not only recognition of the indications and benefits of such hybrid therapy but also a complete understanding of potential pitfalls of such therapy.

ICD therapy in the new millennium

Remarkable progress has been made in the 15 years since ICD therapy was approved for human use. The early "shock boxes" had almost no diagnostic capabilities and required thoracotomy for epicardial patch implantation with typical duration of hospitalization of about a week. Pulse-generator longevity was less than 2 years. Modern devices provide detailed information about the morphology and rate of electrocardiographic signals before, during, and after arrhythmia therapy. The down-sizing of pulse generators and improvements in lead design and shock waveforms allow the simplicity of defibrillator implantation to approach that of pacemakers, with defibrillation thresholds comparable with those initially observed with epicardial patches. Despite the marked reduction in size and increase in diagnostic capabilities, device longevity is now longer than 6 years. Routine outpatient ICD implantation is presently feasible and will increase in frequency if ongoing primary prevention trials prove beneficial. Further advances in lead technology and arrhythmia discrimination should increase the efficacy and reliability of therapy. Finally, devices have the capabilities to treat multiple problems in addition to life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias including atrial arrhythmias and congestive heart failure.

Dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator benefits and limitations

Dual chamber ICD capable of providing dual chamber pacing (DDD) and ventricular arrhythmia therapy is now available. We report our experience of clinical performance of dual chamber ICDs amongst Chinese population.

METHODS

9 patients (6 men and 3 women) received dual chamber ICDs, mean age 50 +/- 18.8 years. The indications were ventricular fibrillation (VF) [5], hemodynamic intolerant ventricular tachycardia (VT) [3] and unexplained syncope plus positive induction of VF [1]. The underlying cardiac pathology were congenital LQT syndrome(1), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy [2], coronary artery disease [2], rheumatic valvular disease [1], Brugada syndrome [1], arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia [1] and idiopathic VF [1]. Four patients have documented paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). All patients have defibrillation thresholds (DFT) determined with a binary search protocol starting at 12 joules (J) at implantation.

RESULTS

A total of 34 episodes of VF were induced at implantation with mean DFT 13.8 +/- 7 J. The average shocking impedance was 40 +/- 3.6 Omega. The mean acute P wave measured 3.3 +/- 1.3 mV and R wave measured 13.2 +/- 3.2 mV. Atrial and ventricular thresholds, at pulse width 0.5 ms, averaged 0.8 +/- 0.4 V and 0.4 +/- 0.2 V. During follow-up period, 16 episodes of VF were documented and were successfully treated with the first programmed shock. In the patient with LQT syndrome, DDD was initiated to prevent pause-dependant VF. Three episodes of inappropriate therapy (15.8%) were delivered. One patient experienced 2 shocks after exercise. Stored electrograms showed sinus tachycardia with first degree heart block which was misdiagnosed as VT with retrograde 1:1 conduction. Another inappropriate therapy occurred with AF with fast ventricular response within the VF zone and VT therapy inhibitor was disabled.

CONCLUSION

Dual chamber ICD allows combined benefits of DDD and VT/VF therapy. Storage of both atrial and ventricular electrograms provide more information in elucidation of nature of dysarrhythmias. Inappropriate shocks, though reduced, are still possible and the rigid algorithms of SVT discrimination from VT will need further published.

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

Implantable defibrillators have become the dominant therapeutic modality for patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. Current defibrillators are small (<60 mL) and implanted with techniques similar to standard pacemakers. They provide high-energy shocks for ventricular fibrillation and rapid ventricular tachycardia, antitachycardia pacing for monomorphic ventricular tachycardia, as well as antibradycardia pacing. Newer devices incorporating an atrial lead allow dual-chamber pacing and better discrimination between ventricular and supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. Randomized controlled trials have shown superior survival with implantable defibrillators than with antiarrhythmic drugs in survivors of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias and in high-risk patients with coronary artery disease. Complications associated with implantable defibrillator therapy include infection, lead failure, and spurious shocks for supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. Most patients adapt well to living with an implantable defibrillator, although driving often has to be restricted. Limited evidence suggests that implantable defibrillator therapy is cost-effective when compared with other widely accepted treatments. The use of implantable defibrillators is likely to continue to expand in the future. Ongoing clinical trials will define further prophylactic indications of the implantable defibrillator and clarify its cost-effectiveness ratio in different clinical settings.

Technologic advances in implantable cardioverter defibrillators

Multiple technologic advances in the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) have resulted in smaller size, easier implantation, and improved detection, therapy, and stored diagnostic information. Advanced dual-chamber ICDs are currently available that allow dual-chamber rate-responsive pacing with mode switching, enhanced detection algorithms, antitachycardia pacing, low-energy cardioversion, high-energy shocks, and extensive diagnostics. Based on improvements in lead systems and improved energy waveforms, almost all devices are being implanted with nonthoracotomy leads in the pectoralis area. The results of recent clinical trials have expanded indications for the ICD for primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death. With advances in capacitor and battery technology coupled with improved lead systems and waveform resulting in lower defibrillation thresholds, it is likely that lower-output, smaller devices will be developed. In the future, ICDs may have expanded indications and may incorporate physiologic sensors to access hemodynamic significance of arrhythmias and algorithms for prediction and prevention of cardiac arrhythmias.

A new defibrillator discrimination algorithm utilizing electrogram morphology analysis

Inappropriate therapies delivered by implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) for supraventricular arrhythmias remain a common problem, particularly in the event of rapidly conducted atrial fibrillation or marked sinus tachycardia. The ability to differentiate between ventricular tachycardia and supraventricular arrhythmias is the major goal of discrimination algorithms. Therefore, we developed a new algorithm, SimDis, utilizing morphological features of the shocking electrograms. This algorithm was developed from electrogram data obtained from 36 patients undergoing ICD implantation. An independent test set was evaluated in 25 patients. Recordings were made in sinus rhythm, sinus tachycardia, and following the induction of ventricular tachycardia and atrial fibrillation. The arrhythmia complex is defined as wide if the duration is at least 30% greater than the template in sinus rhythm. For narrow complexes, four maximum and minimum values were measured to form a 4-element feature vector, which was compared with a representative feature vector during normal sinus rhythm. For each rhythm, any wide complex was classified as ventricular tachycardia. For narrow complexes, the second step of the algorithm compared the electrogram with the template, computing similarity and dissimilarity values. These values were then mapped to determine if they fell within a previously established discrimination boundary. On the independent test set, the SimDis algorithm correctly classified 100% of ventricular tachycardias (27/27), 98% of sinus tachycardias (54/55), and 100% of episodes of atrial fibrillation (37/37). We conclude that the SimDis algorithm yields high sensitivity (100%) and specificity (99%) for arrhythmia discrimination, using the computational capabilities of an ICD system.

Prospective evaluation of new and old criteria to discriminate between supraventricular and ventricular tachycardia in implantable defibrillators

This study was designed to evaluate the ability to distinguish between supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs) and ventricular tachycardias (VTs) based on onset, stability, and width criteria in an implantable defibrillator. Inappropriate detection of atrial fibrillation and sinus tachycardia is a common problem in patients with implantable defibrillators. The onset, stability, and width criteria were studied in 17 patients who underwent implantation of a Medtronic 7218C implantable defibrillator by inducing sinus tachycardia and atrial fibrillation. Additional data on the width criteria was obtained by pacing at separate sites in both the left and right ventricle. Patients were studied at different times for up to 6 months to determine any changes in the criteria. The onset and stability criteria caused inappropriate detections in 36% and 12% of the episodes, respectively. The addition of the width criteria decreased the inappropriate detection using the onset and stability criteria to 5% and 2%, respectively. Pacing from the RV apex, RV outflow tract, and LV apex was appropriately detected as wide in 76%, 41%, and 94%, respectively. The width criteria changed over time in individual patients, but was stable by 6 months in all but one patient. No single criterion is satisfactory for distinguishing between SVT and VT in this patient population, but the combination of criteria seems to provide better discrimination. The width criteria can change dramatically over time and needs to be monitored carefully. Newer algorithms will need to be developed to allow better detection of supraventricular tachycardias.

Distortion of intracardiac electrograms following defibrillator shocks for atrial tachyarrhythmias

In three patients with a defibrillator system consisting of a Ventak P2 pulse generator and an Endotak C transvenous lead, we observed distortion of intracardiac electrograms following defibrillator shocks for atrial arrhythmias. There was a transient marked widening of the intracardiac ventricular complexes resembling ventricular tachycardia. This phenomenon should be recognized when evaluating arrhythmic episodes.

Programming of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators on the basis of the upper limit of vulnerability

BACKGROUND

A patient-specific measure of defibrillation efficacy that requires a minimum number of ventricular fibrillation (VF) episodes would be valuable for programming implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). The upper limit of vulnerability (ULV) is the weakest shock strength at or above which VF is not induced when a stimulus is delivered during the vulnerable phase of the cardiac cycle. It correlates with the defibrillation threshold (DFT) and can be determined with a single episode of VF. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that ICDs programmed on the basis of the ULV convert spontaneous ICD-detected VF reliably.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 100 consecutive patients at ICD implantation and during follow-up of 20 +/- 7 months. At implantation, the ULV and DFT were determined, and the ICD system was tested at a shock strength equal to the ULV + 3 J. During follow-up, the strength of the first shock was programmed to the ULV + 5 J for arrhythmias detected in the VF zone (cycle length < 292 +/- 17 ms). We reviewed stored detection intervals and electrograms from spontaneous episodes of ICD-detected VF to determine the success rate for appropriate first shocks. The programmed first-shock strength was 17.5 +/- 5.2 J. During follow-up, there were 120 appropriate first shocks in 37 patients. The arrhythmia was rapid monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) in 70% of episodes (31 patients), VF in 11% (13 patients), polymorphic VT in 1%, and unclassified in 17% (15 patients). The first shock was successful in 119 of 120 episodes (99%; 95% CI, 93% to 100%). One unclassified episode required two shocks. No patient had syncope associated with an ICD shock or arrhythmic death.

CONCLUSIONS

ICD shocks can be programmed on the basis of the ULV, a measurement made in regular rhythm, without a direct measure of defibrillation efficacy.

Experience with unipolar pectoral defibrillation

With simple, single lead unipolar pectoral defibrillators, ICD technology has reached a level of ease and safety comparable to pacemaker implantation. It will be difficult to further decrease the morbidity associated with ICD implantation; just as it will be difficult to improve upon current device treatment of sudden cardiac death. Even as further incremental improvements in devices and leads will undoubtedly occur, at this point in ICD evolution, it is investigating the expanded use of this therapy as a prevention tool that is likely to have the largest overall impact on cardiac arrest survival.

Unipolar pectoral defibrillation systems

Over the past 15 years, the implantation of automatic defibrillations has evolved from an obscure, impractical, and often morbid procedure to nearly a routine therapy. Initial large abdominally implanted generators with multiple epicardial leads have given way to much smaller, pectorally implanted systems utilizing only a single lead. These systems are better accepted by physicians and patients and rival recent-generation pacemakers in their implantation simplicity. Outcomes with single lead defibrillator implantation have been excellent. They are 99% effective at eliminating sudden death in large cohorts of patients, with overall survival of 94.4% at 18 months. Previously significant perioperative complications and mortality associated with epicardial systems have been virtually eliminated. Transvenous single lead systems now provide defibrillation efficacy at a level that makes epicardial leads unnecessary in most patients. Although inappropriate shocks are not a morbid complication, they still occur in approximately 15%-30% of patients. This is an area for improvement in defibrillator therapy, which, though invisible in total mortality statistics, is significant in terms of patient comfort and acceptance. Incremental improvements in pulse generator design and defibrillator lead technology are being made. Perhaps the most interesting new development will be the dual chamber device, incorporating and atrial electrode for sensing, pacing, and perhaps, atrial defibrillation. Such improvements will continue to make device therapy of all arrhythmias more versatile and improve patient comfort both in terms of device size and inappropriate shocks. It is unlikely, however, that further technological advances can further diminish the already small complication rate or improve the already excellent efficacy of current single lead systems. Defibrillator technology has already reached a maturity where technological improvements are less significant than efforts to better define the patient population who will benefit from the therapy.

Transvenous defibrillation lead systems

The use of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator has grown dramatically over the past 10 years. One of the major advances in defibrillation technology is the development of transvenous lead systems. Compared with traditional epicardial lead systems, transvenous defibrillation leads reduce perioperative mortality, hospitalization, and costs. Transvenous lead systems provide reliable sensing of ventricular tachyarrhythmias, although redetection of ventricular fibrillation can be prolonged, especially with integrated lead systems. Both ramp and burst adaptive pacing are equally effective for the termination of ventricular tachycardia and are successful in up to 90% of spontaneous events. Defibrillation thresholds are higher with transvenous leads than with epicardial patches. These thresholds are reduced with the use of multiple transvenous leads, subcutaneous patches, or with reversing shock polarity. However, the development of biphasic waveforms has made the largest impact on the efficacy of these lead systems, allowing dual coil transvenous systems to be effective in about 90% of patients. Defibrillation efficacy is further enhanced and implantation simplified by the incorporation of an active pulse generator located in the left pectoral region. Active pectoral pulse generators with biphasic waveforms will be the primary lead system for new implants.