Stentless xenograft repair of excavating aortic root sepsis

Outcomes After Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Reconstruction With a Tube Graft for Annular Erosion

BACKGROUND

Aortic annular erosion is a serious complication of aortic valve endocarditis or previous aortic valve replacement. This study examined the outcomes of a technique for left ventricular outflow tract reconstruction using a polyester tube graft, followed by translocation of the aortic valve and coronary arteries.

METHODS

A total of 23 patients with extensive annular erosion resulting from endocarditis or previous aortic valve replacement with or without pseudoaneurysm formation, or occurring after excision of the native valve, underwent suture of a polyester tube graft in the left ventricular outflow tract below the annulus, replacement of the aortic valve and proximal ascending aorta with a composite graft, and reimplantation of the coronary arteries with the use of interposition polyester grafts. The mean age of the patients was 50 years, and 57% were men.

RESULTS

There were no hospital deaths. The mean duration of follow-up was 6.5 years and extended to 16 years. Actuarial survival at 1, 5, and 10 years was 86.7%, 82.2%, and 62.6%, respectively. Two patients required reoperation for a graft-graft pseudoaneurysm and for degeneration of a porcine bioprosthesis. Echocardiograms obtained at a mean of 75 months postoperatively in 15 of the 23 patients demonstrated normal left ventricular outflow tract dimensions and velocities and a mean effective valve orifice area of 1.07 cm²/m². All coronary artery grafts were patent on angiography a mean of 40 months postoperatively in 13 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Extended experience with this technique confirms its safety and effectiveness for patients with extensive destruction of the aortic annulus. It represents a suitable alternative to other currently used techniques.

Surgical management of severe damage of the aortic annulus

Aortic annular erosion and abscess are serious complications of prosthetic aortic valve endocarditis and can be treated with aortic valve translocation and left ventricle outflow tract reconstruction. These two surgical techniques seem to have similar early postoperative outcomes, and their use can be considered an option after the failure of conventional surgical methods.

Freestyle root replacement for complex destructive aortic valve endocarditis

OBJECTIVES

In destructive aortic valve endocarditis with abscess formation in the root, homografts are used more often than xenografts. Because we had reliable perioperative results with Freestyle (Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, Minn) xenograft root replacement in these complex patients, we analyzed the long-term outcome in this high-risk indication.

METHODS

Of 126 consecutive patients with aortic valve endocarditis treated by surgery from 1997 to 2012, 32 (25.4%) received a Freestyle aortic root replacement for severe, destructive valve endocarditis and were studied retrospectively with approval of the local ethical committee. Perioperative complications, recurrence of endocarditis, and long-term morbidity and mortality were analyzed. The follow-up period was 3 months to 11.5 years.

RESULTS

Indication for surgery was native (n = 9) and prosthetic valve endocarditis (n = 23). In 18 patients, concomitant procedures were performed: coronary bypass (n = 9), additional valve surgery (n = 6), and ascending aortic surgery (n = 7). Thirty-day mortality was 19.4% (n = 6). There were no instances of technical failure requiring modification of the surgical strategy or reoperation for anastomotic bleeding. Actuarial survival at 5 and 10 years was 61.9% and 54.2%, respectively. Freedom from death, reoperation for prostheses dysfunction, and recurrence of endocarditis as the composite end point at 5 and 10 years was 56.3% and 53.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The Freestyle root was used successfully with no technical complications in all patients with most severe destructive aortic root endocarditis. In view of this complex patient population, short- and long-term results make this conduit a reliable choice for treatment of this condition.

Left ventricular outflow tract reconstruction and translocation of the aortic valve for annular erosion: early and midterm outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Aortic annular erosion is a serious complication of aortic valve endocarditis or previous aortic valve replacement without endocarditis, and its surgical management is challenging. We present the early and midterm results of a technique for left ventricular outflow tract and aortic root reconstruction with a polyester tube graft and translocation of the aortic valve and coronary arteries.

METHODS

A polyester tube graft is placed into the left ventricle and sutured to the left ventricular outflow tract below the area of erosion. The graft is then everted and sutured to a composite graft. Interposition polyester grafts from the coronary arteries are attached to the composite graft above the valve. This technique has been used in 12 cases. All but 1 patient had previously undergone aortic root or aortic valve replacement, and 4 had endocarditis of prosthetic (n = 2) or aortic allograft (n = 2) valves.

RESULTS

There were no in-hospital deaths. There was 1 early death from pulmonary embolism at 1 postoperative month and 2 late deaths at 15 and 64 postoperative months, both resulting from heart failure. The remaining 9 patients are alive at 3 to 132 postoperative months. Actuarial 5-year survival is 75%.

CONCLUSIONS

Left ventricular outflow tract reconstruction with translocation of the aortic valve and coronary arteries for annular erosion is a useful technique that safely excludes the area of annular erosion and eliminates left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. The procedure can be safely performed with satisfactory early outcomes and 5-year survival.

Freestyle stentless bioprosthesis for active aortic infectious endocarditis with undetermined causative organism

A 52-year-old woman developed congestive heart failure and was diagnosed with aortic regurgitation with approximately 20 mm of vegetation located on the noncoronary cusp of the aortic valve. The patient had undergone tooth extraction 3 months earlier, and various antibiotics had been given in the treatment of refractory high fever for 1 month. The damage to the aortic valve extended to the fibrous trigone near the mitral valve, and aggressive debridement of necrotic and infected tissue was done. The excised defect was repaired and reinforced with a pericardial patch, and the Freestyle stentless bioprosthesis was implanted using the full-root technique. Although the causative organism was never isolated, recurrent endocarditis has not occurred during 3 years of follow-up. The Freestyle stentless bioprosthesis was useful in the management of active aortic infectious endocarditis with undetermined causative organism for the prevention of recurrent endocarditis in the early postoperative period.

Prosthetic valve endocarditis

Prosthetic valve endocarditis is a catastrophic complication of cardiac valve replacement, associated with high mortality rates. Medical treatment is effective in a few instances of endocarditis involving the leaflets alone in bioprostheses. However, accurate diagnosis, better myocardial protection, and improved surgical strategies have led to better survival in patients undergoing surgery after failed conservative therapy. This comprehensive review addresses various issues involved in the management of this complication.

Treatment of destructive aortic valve endocarditis with the Freestyle Aortic Root Bioprosthesis

BACKGROUND

Successful treatment of destructive aortic valve endocarditis with annular abscess formation requires extensive surgical debridement and reconstruction of the left ventricular outflow tract and aortic root. Homograft aortic roots are the conduits of choice, but because they are not available in all cases, alternative conduits are needed.

METHODS

Owing to its features, which are comparable to those of homografts, the Freestyle aortic root xenograft was used in 10 consecutive patients aged between 32 and 77 years. All patients had extensive abscess formation, 5 presented with prosthetic valve endocarditis, 2 had additional mitral valve endocarditis requiring partial leaflet resection and reconstruction, 1 patient had an additional fistula into the right atrium, and 1 required coronary bypass. One patient developed a septic ventricular septal defect and fistula into the right atrium with tricuspid valve endocarditis.

RESULTS

None of the patients required reoperation for bleeding. Two (20%) patients died in the postoperative period, 1 due to multiorgan failure, and 1 due to preexisting invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. At autopsy, neither had evidence of intrapericardial hematoma or suture dehiscence. One patient died 13 months postoperatively without clinical signs of valve dysfunction or recurrent endocarditis. All other patients are well at 12 to 42 months after surgery. Clinical examination and echocardiography at the most recent follow-up showed no signs of valve dysfunction, recurrent fistulation, or endocarditis.

CONCLUSIONS

The Freestyle aortic root appears to be an acceptable alternative to homografts in the treatment of severe endocarditis. Long-term valve durability in younger patients, however, remains to be determined.

Congenital mitral-aortic discontinuity

Mitral-aortic (M-A) discontinuity is an uncommonly observed congenital malformation. From the embryologic point of view, it is a failure of the superior endocardial cushion of the A-V canal reach and insert into the aortic root (the mitral-aortic fibrous trigone). It should be differentiated from aorto-left ventricular discontinuity, a complication of endocarditis with excavating abscesses without boundaries. In congenital mitral-aortic discontinuity, the anterior leaflet of the mitral valve fails to insert into the aortic root. We report our experience with 2 patients. In patient 1, the severe left ventricular outflow obstruction was mainly caused by the mobile anterior leaflet of the mitral valve.

Stentless bioprostheses in aortic root disease

INTRODUCTION

The availability of aortic homografts is steadily decreasing. In the meantime, stentless xenografts convey similar flow characteristics, and tissue preservation methods are improving durability. Initially, these valves were contraindicated in aortic roots with discrepancy between annulus and sinotubular junction or with extensive calcification or sepsis. With increasing experience stentless xenografts are now applied in a wide spectrum of aortic root disease.

METHODS

I reviewed our own experience with stentless aortic bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement (AVR) and more taxing root problems. I used these valves in aortic aneurysm repair, acute Type A dissection, and for endocarditis with abcess formation. I studied valve hemodynamics, regression of left ventricular hypertrophy, and comparative survival with stented bioprostheses.

RESULTS

Stentless bioprostheses convey hemodynamic and possibly survival benefit through a low incidence of valve-related complications. They provide a useful alternative to aortic homografts in endocarditis, Type A dissection, and aortic aneurysm surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Stentless bioprostheses are no longer confined to AVR alone. Experience supports the use of stentless bioprostheses where aortic homografts were previously applied. With availability in a wide range of sizes.