Concomitant carotid endarterectomy and coronary bypass surgery: should cardiopulmonary bypass be used for the carotid procedure?

A Modified Combined Approach to Operative Carotid and Coronary Artery Disease: 82 Cases in 8 Years

BACKGROUND

A significant number of patients undergoing coronary artery surgery have severe carotid artery disease. It is also true that up to half of the patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) have severe treatable coronary lesions. This study aims to review data regarding 82 patients of combined approach in 8 years; the second half consists of 44 patients whose CEA was performed under local anesthesia. It compares results of the conventional and the modified approaches to simultaneous surgery.

METHODS

All 82 patients who planned to have a concomitant procedure were recorded prospectively between 1995 and 2003. From 1998, the surgical technique has been modified to switch to local anesthesia for CEA, rather than perform under a single general anesthetic period. All pre-and perioperative data as well as in-hospital and outpatient control (mid- to long-term) data were recorded. A P-value of less than .05 was considered as significant. Analysis of survival was performed by using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test.

RESULTS

The 30-day follow-up was 100% complete for all patients. All patients were followed for 59.59 to 114 months) months postoperatively. Three patients (6.8%) in the modified and 2 (5.2%) in the standard group had intraluminal shunting (P > .05). In the standard group, 3 patients expired and 3 had perioperative stroke; only 1 patient had a stroke in the modified group and two expired (P > .05). Mean survival time according to Kaplan-Meier test was 109.97, SE 2.84, 95% CI (104.41-115.52) months for the former group, whereas it was 62.79, SE 1.20, 95% CI (60.4565.13) months for the latter. Actuarial estimates of survival during ten-year follow up were 94.44% SE 3.83 in ten-year follow-ups and 97.67% SE 2.30 in 5-year follow-ups for the modified group (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Avoidance from extended periods of general anesthesia and cardiopulmonary bypass periods as well as immediate recognition of impaired cerebral flow during CEA and the time it provides to take preventive measures are the most important benefits of the modified technique without significantly changing hospital and long-term mortality and stroke. It may also reduce the cost and the waiting period for the suffering patient.

Concomitant Carotid Endarterectomy and Coronary Bypass Surgery: Outcome of On-Pump and Off-Pump Techniques

BACKGROUND

There continues to be a dilemma regarding the best means of surgical management of significant carotid artery disease in patients requiring coronary artery bypass surgery. A combined approach of coronary artery bypass and carotid endarterectomy has shown good results in patients with concomitant carotid and coronary artery disease. We reviewed our results of coronary artery surgery using conventional cardiopulmonary bypass or off-pump techniques and carotid endarterectomy done as a combined procedure.

METHODS

Between January 1996 and June 2002, 358 patients underwent concomitant coronary artery bypass and carotid endarterectomy. There were 140 males (84.3%) and 26 females (15.7%) in group I. Group II consisted of 158 males (82.3%) and 34 females (17.7%). One hundred sixty-six patients (group I) were done off pump whereas in 192 patients (group II), the procedure was done using conventional cardiopulmonary bypass. Carotid endarterectomy was performed before coronary artery bypass surgery in both groups.

RESULTS

The average number of grafts were 3.4 +/- 0.8 with average operative time of 4.2 +/- 0.4 hours in group I, and 3.3 +/- 0.8 graft with operative time of 5.3 +/- 1.2 hours in group II (p = 0.239 and p < 0.001, respectively). There were 2 deaths (1.2%) in group I and 3 deaths (1.6%) in group II (p = 0.870). No patient from group I and 1 patient (0.5%) from group II had postoperative stroke (p = 0.941). Mean hospital stay was 9.0 +/- 1.2 days in group I and 11.2 +/- 1.7 days in group II (p < 0.001). At mean follow-up of 2.8 +/- 0.9 years in group I, 2 patients (1.2%) had late death due to cardiac failure and contralateral carotid endarterectomy was done in 2 patients (1.2%). Group II had mean follow-up of 2.4 +/- 0.6 years, during which 4 patients (2.1%) had late death and contralateral carotid endarterectomy was done in 3 patients (1.6%). Late stroke was seen in 1 patient (0.6%) from group I and 2 patients (1.0%) from group II.

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass is a safe and effective procedure in patients with significant coronary and carotid artery disease. Equally good results can be reproduced using cardiopulmonary bypass or off-pump techniques for coronary artery surgery, with low morbidity, mortality, and good long-term results.

A systematic review of outcome following synchronous carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass: Influence of surgical and patient variables

OBJECTIVES

Outcomes after synchronous carotid endarterectomy (CEA) plus coronary artery bypass (CABG) relative to surgical and patient based variables.

DESIGN

Systematic review of 94 published series (7863 synchronous procedures).

RESULTS

11.5% of patients died or suffered a stroke/myocardial infarction in the peri-operative period (95% CI 10.1-12.9). The risk of death/stroke appeared to significantly diminish in studies published between 1993-2002, compared with 1972-1992 (7.2% (95% CI 6.5-9.1) versus 10.7% (95% CI 8.9-12.5), p = 0.03). However, increasing operative experience was not associated with significantly lower risks of death/stroke; (1-49 cases (9.6% (95% CI 7.5-11.8); 50-99 cases (9.1% (95% CI 6.4-11.8); 100+ cases (8.4% (95% CI 6.9-10.1) (p = 0.64)). Patients with severe bilateral carotid disease were significantly more likely to suffer death and/or stroke compared to patients with unilateral disease (odds ratio 2.5, 95% CI 1.4-5.0, p = 0.001). Similarly, patients with a prior history of stroke/transient ischaemic attack (TIA) were significantly more likely to suffer a further stroke than asymptomatic patients (odds ratio 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-2.8, p = 0.008). There was no difference in the risk of death/stroke relative to the timing of CEA (pre- versus on-cardiopulmonary bypass), but recent small studies indicate that improved outcomes might be achieved by performing CABG 'off-bypass'.

CONCLUSIONS

Synchronous CEA + CABG is associated with a not insignificant cardiovascular risk. No comparable information is available for similar patients undergoing CABG without prophylactic CEA.

A systematic review of outcomes following staged and synchronous carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass

OBJECTIVES

to determine the overall cardiovascular risk for patients with combined cardiac and carotid artery disease undergoing synchronous coronary artery bypass (CABG) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA), staged CEA then CABG and reverse staged CABG then CEA.

DESIGN

systematic review of 97 published studies following 8972 staged or synchronous operations.

RESULTS

mortality was highest in patients undergoing synchronous CEA+CABG (4.6%, 95% CI 4.1-5.2). Reverse staged procedures (CABG-CEA) were associated with the highest risk of ipsilateral stroke (5.8%, 95% CI 0.0-14.3) and any stroke (6.3%, 95% CI 1.0-11.7). Peri-operative myocardial infarction (MI) was lowest following the reverse staged procedure (0.9%, 95% CI 0.5-1.4) and highest in patients undergoing staged CEA-CABG (6.5%, 95% CI 3.2-9.7). The risk of death+/-any stroke was highest in patients undergoing synchronous CEA+CABG (8.7%, 95% CI 7.7-9.8) and lowest following staged CEA-CABG (6.1%, 95% CI 2.9-9.3). The risk of death/stroke or MI was 11.5% (95% CI 10.1-12.9) following synchronous procedures versus 10.2% (95% CI 7.4-13.1) after staged CEA then CABG.

CONCLUSIONS

10-12% of patients undergoing staged or synchronous procedures suffered death or major cardiovascular morbidity (stroke, MI) within 30 days of surgery. Overall, there was no significant difference in outcomes for staged and synchronous procedures and no comparable data for patients with combined cardiac and carotid disease not undergoing staged or synchronous surgery.