Improving the reproducibility of QT dispersion measures

Weighing the QT intervals with the slope or the amplitude of the T wave

OBJECTIVE

The reproducibility of QT interval measurements is low, even for the mean QT interval based on the standard ECG. In this study we analyzed whether the reproducibility of the mean weighed QT interval was better than the simple mean QT interval. The weighing was based on the amplitude of the T wave or the slope of the steepest tangent on the terminal part of the T wave.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

12-lead ECGs of 130 postmyocardial infarction patients were obtained. The QT intervals were measured by the tangent-method on two occasions by the same observer Mismatch QT intervals were defined as QT intervals that were measured at only one occasion. Sixteen ECGs were rejected. The data were split into 34 and 80 ECGs for optimization and validation of the weighing, respectively. The weighed QT dispersion was calculated as the weighed mean of the three longest minus the weighed mean of the three shortest QT intervals.

RESULTS

Weighing with the slope increased the reproducibility by 41% (P = 3 10(-6)), but weighing with the amplitude reduced it by 20% (P = 0.02). However, if measurements with errors above 75 ms were rejected, weighing with the slope or the amplitude increased the reproducibility with 26% and 20% (P = 0.02), respectively. Weighing did not change the reproducibility of the weighed QT dispersion.

CONCLUSION

Weighing with the slope improved the reproducibility of the mean weighed QT interval. However, if measurements with errors above 75 ms were rejected, weighing with the amplitude also increased the reproducibility. Weighing did not change the reproducibility of the weighed QT dispersion. Weighing is particularly efficient at reducing the negative impact of mismatch QT intervals on the reproducibility.

The prognostic accuracy of different QT interval measures

BACKGROUND

The QT intervals accuracy for predicting arrhythmic death varies between studies, possibly due to differences in the selection of the lead used for measurement of the QT interval. The purpose of this study was to analyze the prognostic accuracy of all known ways to select the lead.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Three institutions that used different methods for measuring QT intervals provided their QT databases. They included more than 3500 twelve-lead surface ECGs. The data represented low- and high-risk patients of the normal population (survivors vs dead from cardiovascular causes), acute myocardial infarction (survivors versus death from all causes) and remote myocardial infarction (with vs without a history of ventricular arrhythmia). The prognostic accuracy was defined as the area under the Receiver Operator Curve (ROC-area). The most accurate standard leads were I and aVL and the least accurate was AVR. The most accurate precordial lead was V4. The prognostic accuracy of the longest QT interval was higher than for any standard lead. The prognostic accuracy of the mean of the three longest QT intervals was equal to or slightly lower than for the longest QT interval.

CONCLUSIONS

The highest prognostic accuracy is obtained with the longest QT interval. The accuracies of the lead selection methods are so different that it can explain a substantial part of the differences between otherwise similar studies in the literature. We recommend the use of the mean value of the three longest QT intervals.

Role of shortened QTc dispersion in in-hospital cardiac events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome

BACKGROUND

QT dispersion (QTD) refers to the difference between maximal and minimal QT values on the electrocardiogram (ECG). QTD values are calculated and corrected with Bazett's formula (corrected QTD = QTcD = QTD/square root of RR). QTcD increases in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Recovery of increased QTcD (shortened QTcD) develops after successful revascularization, but prolonged QTcD occurs in certain patients. The aim of this study is to ascertain the clinical significance between shortened and prolonged QTcD groups after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 128 patients with ACS who had received PCI. The values of QTcD were measured manually on 12-lead standard ECGs obtained within 3 days before and after PCI (pre-PCI QTcD and post-PCI QTcD). All the patients were divided into 2 groups. The shortened QTcD group was defined as those patients with a decrease in QTcD after PCI and the prolonged QTcD group as those with an increase in QTcD after PCI. The underlying diseases, various clinical classifications and some prognostic factors were taken into comparison and statistical analysis between these 2 groups.

RESULTS

The shortened QTcD group showed a significantly higher rate of in-hospital cardiac death (13% vs. 0%, p = 0.006) and a greater pre-PCI QTcD (100.8 +/- 39.5 vs. 61.3 +/- 24.1 ms, p < 0.001) than the prolonged QTcD group. There was a significantly greater pre-PCI QTcD in patients with cardiac death than those without cardiac death (111.6 +/- 38.3 vs. 83.3 +/- 38.3ms, p = 0.027). Furthermore, the patients with in-hospital cardiac death presented with a significantly more frequent occurrence of in-hospital ventricular arrhythmia, compared with those without cardiac death (30.0% vs. 4.0%, p = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

Among the patients with ACS undergoing PCI, directly divided into shortened and prolonged QTcD groups regardless of initial pre-PCI QTcD, the shortened QTcD group showed a higher occurrence of in-hospital cardiac death and a greater pre-PCI QTcD. Shortened QTcD might be 1 risk factor for in-hospital cardiac death.