Prevalence of interatrial block in healthy school-aged children: definition by P-wave duration or morphological analysis

Brazilian Guideline for Exercise Testing in Children and Adolescents - 2024

CLASSES OF RECOMMENDATION

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Bayés' syndrome: Time to consider early anticoagulation?

In the past few decades, extensive research has been conducted on atrial conduction disorders and their clinical relevance. An association between interatrial block (IAB) and supraventricular arrhythmias [most commonly atrial fibrillation (AF)] has been discovered and extensively investigated. We coined the term "Bayés Syndrome" to describe this association, and the medical community has accepted the eponym in recognition to the scientist who discovered most of the aspects associated with it. In this non-systematic review, we will focus on the association between IAB and AF, with special emphasis on the value of the surface 12-lead ECG as a valid tool to predict AF.

Interatrial block: a virtual pandemic requiring attention

Interatrial block (IAB) denotes a conduction delay between the two atria (P-wave duration ≥110 ms). Depending on the severity of the block, IAB can be partial or advanced. Even though several studies have reported a high prevalence of IAB, it still remains a diagnosis many neglect without any follow-up. The crisis in IAB is undramatic until predictable complications appear. Nevertheless, the danger in IAB is real because of the major associations with multiple medical conditions, including atrial fibrillation, myocardial ischemia, left atrial enlargement, and systemic emboli. There are different treatment options for IAB to eliminate its consequences, including pacing and medical management with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers. Pacing has been shown to give promising results and could potentially prevent conditions related to cardiovascular disease such as hypertension or diabetes mellitus. Given the high prevalence of IAB, together with its potentially serious consequences, and yet being largely ignored, we stress attention to this potentially dangerous pandemic and raise consideration for further investigations.

P-wave morphology: underlying mechanisms and clinical implications

Increasing awareness of atrial fibrillation (AF) and its impact on public health revives interest in identification of noninvasive markers of predisposition to AF and ECG-based risk stratification. P-wave duration is generally accepted as the most reliable noninvasive marker of atrial conduction, and its prolongation has been associated with history of AF. However, patients with paroxysmal AF without structural heart disease may not have any impressive P-wave prolongation, thus suggesting that global conduction slowing is not an obligatory requirement for development of AF. P-wave morphology is therefore drawing increasing attention as it reflects the three-dimensional course of atrial depolarization propagation and detects local conduction disturbances. The factors that determine P-wave appearance include (1) the origin of the sinus rhythm that defines right atrial depolarization vector, (2) localization of left atrial breakthrough that defines left atrial depolarization vector, and (3) the shape and size of atrial chambers. However, it is often difficult to distinguish whether P-wave abnormalities are caused by atrial enlargement or interatrial conduction delay. Recent advances in endocardial mapping technologies have linked certain P-wave morphologies with interatrial conduction patterns and the function of major interatrial conduction routes. The value of P-wave morphology extends beyond cardiac arrhythmias associated with atrial conduction delay and can be used for prediction of clinical outcome of a wide range of cardiovascular disorders, including ischemic heart disease and congestive heart failure.

Meta-analysis of p-wave dispersion values in healthy individuals: the influence of clinical characteristics

BACKGROUND

P-wave dispersion (Pd) is an appealing marker for predicting the risk of developing atrial fibrillation. At present, no definitive cutoff value has been determined as to the diagnosis of high-risk patients. Our aims were to evaluate P-wave parameters of healthy subjects published in the literature, determine normal range and weighted means of Pd and P-wave parameters, and investigate the influences of gender, age, and BMI on the weighted results.

METHODS

A systematic search of studies published in PubMed was conducted. Only studies which included control groups of healthy individuals were included.

RESULTS

Of the 657 studies initially identified, 80 were eligible for inclusion. The total number of participants was 6,827. The highest reported Pd values were 58.56 ± 16.24 ms; the lowest were 7 ± 2.7 ms. The weighted mean was 33.46 ± 9.65 ms; weighted median was 32.2 ms. Gender and age were not found to be associated with significant influences on P-wave parameter values. High-normal BMI was not found to be associated with increased P-wave parameter values.

CONCLUSIONS

Pd, Pmax, and Pmin span a wide range of values in healthy individuals. Seemingly, abnormal values were often reported in healthy adults. The high variability of P-wave parameters in healthy individuals, and overlapping of the results with those reported for patients with increased risk for atrial fibrillation, might suggest that this technique has limited sensitivity and specificity. The variability between studies may stem from methodological issues and, therefore, there is a definite need for methodological standardization of Pd measurements.