Hepatitis C virus infection in dialysis patients

Hepatitis C virus and carpal tunnel syndrome in hemodialysis patients: a single center cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a common complication in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients and leads to disabilities and increased risk of mortality. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is associated with inflammatory and oxidative stress, and HCV infection can be cured. This study aimed at evaluating the association of HCV infection with CTS.

METHODS

Using a cross-sectional design, anthropometric and laboratory data were collected. Serum β₂-microglobulin, HCV antibody and HCV-RNA were measured. CTS was diagnosed according to clinical manifestation, electrophysiological test or ultrasonography. The related factors for CTS were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

This study included 113 participants, of whom 33 (29.2%) patients were positive for HCV antibody and 18 (15.9%) were positive for HCV antibody and HCV-RNA. Thirty-two (28.3%) patients were diagnosed with CTS. There were significant differences in the dialysis vintage, age of onset of MHD, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, serum β₂M, anti-HCV-positive, HCV-RNA-positive, HCV load values and urine volume category between the CTS group and non-CTS group (p < 0.05). High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (OR: 1.238, 95% CI: 1.071-1.431, p = 0.004), dialysis vintage (OR: 1.017, 95% CI: 1.008-1.026, p < 0.001) and HCV-RNA-positive (OR: 5.929, 95% CI: 1.295-27.132, p = 0.022) rather than anti-HCV-positive were related factors for CTS.

CONCLUSIONS

High-sensitivity C-reactive protein, dialysis vintage and HCV-RNA replication but not previous HCV-infection were related factors for CTS in MHD patients. Further studies are needed to clarify whether intervention is beneficial for preventing and delaying the progression of CTS in MHD patients with HCV-RNA replication.

Differential Effect of Viral Hepatitis Infection on Mortality among Korean Maintenance Dialysis Patients: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study

The role of infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) in terms of survival among dialysis patients remains incompletely understood. In the present multicenter prospective cohort study, we investigated the prevalences of HBV and HCV infection among 3,321 patients receiving maintenance dialysis in Korea, and assessed the impacts of these infections on survival. All included patients underwent hepatitis B antigen (HBsAg) and HCV antibody (Ab) testing, which revealed that 236 patients (7.1%) were HBsAg-positive, and 123 patients (3.7%) were HCV Ab-positive. HBsAg-positive and HCV Ab-positive patients were matched to hepatitis virus-negative patients using a propensity score at a ratio of 1:2. The prevalences of HBV and HCV infection did not significantly differ according to dialysis modality. Linear-by-linear association analysis revealed that hepatitis B prevalence significantly increased with increasing dialysis vintage (p = 0.001), and hepatitis C prevalence tended to be higher with increasing dialysis vintage (p = 0.074). We compared the survival of HBsAg-positive and HCV Ab-positive patients to that of hepatitis virus-negative patients. After propensity score matching, cumulative survival did not differ between HBsAg-positive and HBsAg-negative patients (p = 0.37), while HCV Ab-positive patients showed significantly lower survival than HCV Ab-negative patients (p = 0.03). The main conclusions of the present study are that HBV infection prevalence increased with longer dialysis vintage, and that both HBV and HCV infections were most prevalent among patients with the longest dialysis vintage. Additionally, HCV infection among maintenance dialysis patients is associated with an increased risk of mortality.

Usefulness of combined application of double-filtration plasmapheresis and twice-daily injections of interferon-β in hemodialysis patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1b infection and a high viral load

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common among hemodialysis (HD) patients and has been recognized as an important prognostic factor. Therefore, the aggressive antiviral therapy is necessary for HCV infection in HD patients. However, various treatment limitations exist in HD patients such as the inability to use ribavirin. We have previously reported that HCV RNA can be eradicated by administration of interferon (IFN)-β during HD in patients with HCV infection caused by genotypes known to be sensitive to IFN therapy and low serum HCV RNA levels. In this case report, we tried to clarify the efficacy of combined application of double-filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) and IFN-β in HD patients with HCV genotype 1b infection and high serum HCV RNA levels. We report two HD patients with HCV genotype 1b infection and high viral loads who were successfully treated by five sessions of DFPP undertaken prior to treatment with IFN-β (twice-daily injections for 2 weeks). HCV was eradicated by this combination therapy in both patients. We revealed the efficacy of combined application of DFPP and IFN-β in HD patients with HCV genotype 1b infection and high serum HCV RNA levels. This combined therapy may be useful for the HD patients who are resistant to conventional IFN monotherapy.

Problems associated with hemodialysis and travel

BACKGROUND

While there is a recognized risk of hepatitis C acquisition associated with dialysis away from the "home" center, there is little documented data on the effect that dialysis while traveling has on the dialysis patient's health. This study was designed to examine the incidence of travel within a hemodialysis population and to ascertain whether travel was associated with morbidity for patients on hemodialysis.

METHODS

Travel data were collected prospectively over a 6-month period, from April 2009, for all patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis across our dialysis centers. Biochemical, microbiological, and hematological parameters as well as hepatitis serology and antibiotic starts were recorded for 12 weeks prior to and following dialysis away from center.

RESULTS

A total of 172 individuals traveled on 200 occasions. The blood stream infection rate for travelers with a central venous catheter was 0.25 versus 0.83/1,000 access days (p = 0.038) in the 12 weeks pre-travel versus post-travel. Parenteral and oral antibiotic starts were both significantly elevated post-travel and were mainly instituted for either chest or urinary sepsis. There was evidence of raised inflammatory markers and anemia on return to center but no evidence of hepatitis B or hepatitis C seroconversion.

CONCLUSIONS

Travel and dialysis away from a patient's usual hemodialysis unit is a common occurrence but is associated with an increased risk of bacterial infection, anemia, and inflammatory response. This study provides evidence for the concern that hemodialysis away from center is associated with increased morbidity.

Seroprevalence of Hepatitis Viruses B, C, D and HIV Infection Among Hemodialysis Patients in Kerman Province, South-East Iran

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of hepatitis viruses in hemodialysis patients has been reported to be much greater than in the general population. Attention to local data, effectively guides health planners so that they can control infections and prevent nosocomial transmissions.

OBJECTIVES

This cross sectional study was carried out to determine the prevalence of hepatitis B (HBV), hepatitis C (HCV), and hepatitis D (HDV) viruses, as well as the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in dialysis centers in the Kerman Province, in the southeast of Iran.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All hemodialysis patients (n = 228) in 7 centers were enrolled in the study. Hepatitis B surface antigens (HBsAg), HCV antibodies (Ab), HDV Ab and HIV Ab were measured using specific enzyme linked immunoassay kits (ULTRA kit, bioMérieux, France) and confirmed by a qualitative PCR assay.

RESULTS

The studied group was comprised of 92 (40.4%) females and 136 (59.6%) males. The mean age of the patients was 51 ± 9.5 years and the duration of hemodialysis was 39.7 ± 7.9 months. Positive HBsAg was found in 7% of cases, HCV Ab in 7%, and patients with both viruses were detected in 1.7% cases. HIV Ab and HDV Ab were negative in all cases. Out of the other risk factors, frequency of blood transfusions was significantly correlated with positive HCV Ab (P < 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence of HBV and HCV in hemodialysis patients was moderate to low in the Kerman Province, as in other parts of the country. Strict adherence to protective measures could lead to even lower rates.

Carpal tunnel syndrome in hemodialysis patients as a dialysis-related amyloidosis manifestation--incidence, risk factors and results of surgical treatment

Background

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common complication of dialysis-related amyloidosis (DRA) developing in patients on long-term dialysis therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of CTS and identify factors influencing the development of CTS in patients on maintenance hemodialysis, as well as results of its surgical treatment.

Material/Methods

The study included 386 patients, among whom CTS was diagnosed in 40 patients (10.4%) on the basis of signs and physical symptoms, as well as by nerve conduction. The group of patients with CTS and the group of patients without CTS were compared according to age (mean 54.50 vs. 56.48 years) and duration of dialysis treatment. Initial analysis of CTS incidence by sex, presence of anti-HCV antibodies, and location of arterio-venous fistula (AV fistula) was undertaken.

Results

Duration of dialysis treatment was the statistically significant risk factor for the development of CTS (16.05 vs. 4.51 years; p<0.0001). Among patients treated for a long period on hemodialysis (20–30 years), 100% required surgical release procedures, while 66.66% of those treated for 15–19 years, 42.1% of those treated for 10–14 years, and 1.6% of those treated for less than 10 years. CTS was diagnosed more often in anti-HCV-positive patients as compared with anti-HCV-negative patients (47.5 vs. 6.9%; p<0.0001). No significant differences were found when comparing CTS incidence by sex or between the development of CTS requiring surgical release intervention and location of the AV fistula.

Conclusions

Surgical release procedure of the carpal tunnel gave good treatment results in patients with CTS.

Effect of dialysis modality on survival of hepatitis C-infected ESRF patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is associated with increased mortality and morbidity in end-stage renal failure (ESRF) patients. Despite a lower incidence and risk of transmission of HCV infection with peritoneal dialysis (PD), the optimal dialysis modality for HCV-infected ESRF patients is not known. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of dialysis modality on the survival of HCV-infected ESRF patients.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

The study included all adult incident ESRF patients in Australia and New Zealand who commenced dialysis between January 1, 1994, and December 31, 2008, and were HCV antibody-positive at the time of dialysis commencement. Time to all-cause mortality was compared between hemodialysis (HD) and PD according to modality assignment at day 90, using Cox proportional hazards model analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 424 HCV-infected ESRF patients commenced dialysis during the study period and survived for at least 90 days (PD n = 134; HD n = 290). Mortality rates were comparable between PD and HD in the first year (10.7 versus 13.8 deaths per 100 patient-years, respectively; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.65, 95% CI 0.34 to 1.26) and thereafter (20 versus 15.9 deaths per 100 patient-years, respectively; HR 1.27, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.88).

CONCLUSIONS

The survival of HCV-infected ESRF patients is comparable between PD and HD.

[Infection by hepatitis C virus in patients on hemodialysis: prevalence and risk factors]

CONTEXT

Chronic renal disease patients on hemodialysis are at increased risk of infection by hepatitis C virus (HCV). High prevalence rates have been reported from dialysis units worldwide. Recent studies have shown an inverse relation between HCV infection and life expectancy of patients on hemodialysis and those undergoing renal transplant.

OBJECTIVES

Assess the prevalence of and risk factors for HCV infection in patients undergoing hemodialysis.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was undertaken from January to December, 2007. During this period, 236 patients were tested for anti-HCV antibodies with third generation ELISA. Those who tested positive further underwent qualitative PCR testing for HCV-RNA. A subject was considered HCV-infected if both tests (anti-HCV and HCV-RNA) were positive. Monthly serum ALT and the mean for the 12-month period were obtained from 195 patients. Two hundred eight (88.1%) patients answered a standardized questionnaire aiming to identify risk factors for HCV infection.

RESULTS

Of the 236 subjects studied, 14.8% (35/236) tested positive for anti-HCV antibodies. Of these, 71.6% (25/35) tested positive for HCV-RNA. Chronic HCV infection was thus prevalent in 10.6% (25/236). Bivariate analysis showed time on hemodialysis, number of blood transfusions, previous peritoneal dialysis and previous sexually transmitted diseases to be the main risk factors for HCV infection. Yet multivariate analysis showed that just time on hemodialysis and previous sexually transmitted diseases were significantly associated with HCV infection. Patients on hemodialysis for over 10 years were 73.9 (CI 17.5-311.8) times as likely to have acquired HCV, compared with those on hemodialysis for up to 5 years. Patients with previous sexually transmitted diseases had a 4.8 times higher risk of HCV infection compared with those without previous sexually transmitted diseases. Mean serum ALT was significantly higher in HCV-infected patients (44.0 +/-13.5 U/L versus 33.5 +/- 8.0 U/L, P<0,001).

CONCLUSION

HCV infection was highly prevalent in the dialysis unit studied. Time on dyalitic treatment and previous sexually transmitted diseases were the main risk factors for HCV infection. HCV-infected patients on hemodialysis had higher serum ALT levels than those without chronic HCV infection.

Lack of de novo hepatitis C virus infections and absence of nosocomial transmissions of GB virus C in a large cohort of German haemodialysis patients

To determine the prevalence and incidence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections among haemodialysis patients, a large prospective multicentre trial was conducted in the German Federal State of North Rhine-Westphalia. Sera obtained from the recruited patients in two separate sampling rounds run 1 year apart were analysed for both anti-HCV antibodies and HCV RNA. HCV RNA positive samples were also genotyped by direct sequencing of an HCV core fragment. In the first and second rounds, 150 (5.2%) of 2909 and 114 (5.4%) of 2100 patients were anti-HCV positive, respectively, and 4% of individuals were viraemic. Evaluation of potential risk factors in a case-control study indicated that the factors 'foreign country of birth', 'blood transfusions given before 1991' and 'duration of treatment on haemodialysis' were associated with the risk of HCV infection. Among the 2100 patients of whom 'paired' serum samples from both rounds were available for testing, not a single 'de novo' HCV infection could be recorded. The fact that in a subset of about 20% of these patients no nosocomial GB virus C (GBV-C) transmission occurred during the observational period suggests that the lack of HCV seroconversions was not only attributable to the isolation of HCV-infected patients but also to the strict adherence to so-called universal hygienic precautions for infection control maintained in the participating dialysis centres.

Blood borne virus-innovative approach to evaluate, prevent cross-transmission in dialysis units

Large public health interventions to control infectious disease outbreaks are common, but rigorous evaluation to improve the quality and effectiveness of these is rarely undertaken. This project aimed to prevent blood borne virus (BBV) cross-transmission in dialysis units. Following an incident concerning the diagnosis of acute Hepatitis B in a haemodialysis patient, possibly from healthcare associated acquisition, a multifaceted and multidisciplinary investigation was conducted involving consumers, health professionals and administrations. The results of this investigation were then used to produce practical operational guidelines for planning and future interventions. To date, there has been no incidence reported of any cross-transmission of BBV amongst our dialysis population. The actions implemented can be utilised by other departments in preventing other bacterial or viral outbreaks.

Frequencies of hepatitis B and C infections among haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients in Asia-Pacific countries: analysis of registry data

BACKGROUND

The impact of dialysis modality on the rates and types of infectious complications has not been well studied. The aim of the present investigation was to evaluate the rates of hepatitis C virus (HCV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections in peritoneal dialysis (PD) and haemodialysis (HD) patients in the Asia-Pacific region.

METHODS

The study included the most recent period-prevalent data recorded in the national or regional dialysis registries of the 10 Asia-Pacific countries/areas (Australia, New Zealand, Japan, China, Taiwan, Korea, Thailand, Hong Kong, Malaysia and India), where such data were available. Longitudinal data were also available for all incident Australian and New Zealand patients commencing dialysis between 1 April 1995 and 31 December 2005. Rates of HCV and HBV infections were compared by chi-square, Poisson regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses, as appropriate.

RESULTS

Data were obtained on 201,590 patients (HD 173,788; PD 27,802). HCV seroprevalences ranged between 0.7% and 18.1% across different countries and were generally higher in HD versus PD populations (7.9% +/- 5.5% versus 3.0% +/- 2.0%, P = 0.01). Seroconversion rates on dialysis were also significantly higher in HD patients (incidence rate ratio PD versus HD 0.33, 95% CI 0.13-0.75). HCV infection was highly predictive of mortality in Japan (relative risk 1.37, 95% CI 1.15-1.62, P = 0.003) and in Australia and New Zealand (adjusted hazards ratio 1.29, 95% CI 1.05-1.58). HBV infection data were limited, but less clearly influenced by dialysis modality.

CONCLUSIONS

Dialysis modality selection significantly influences the risk of HCV infection experienced by end-stage renal failure patients in the Asia-Pacific region. No such association could be identified for HBV infection.

Hepatitis B and C in dialysis units in Iran: changing the epidemiology

Hepatitis B (HBV) and C (HCV) viruses are the most important infections transmitted by the parenteral route in patients receiving maintenance dialysis. The prevalence varies markedly from country to country. The aim of this study is to review the efficacy of the strategies to reduce the incidence of these infections and the trend of results in Iran. As a routine, all hemodialysis patients in Iran have biannual blood samples for assessment of serum HBSAg, HBS Abs, and HCV Abs. The data are collected in the Ministry of Health. For statistical analysis, prevalence, and incidence were calculated. There is an increasing prevalence/incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in Iran, from 238/49.9 pmp in 2000 to 357/63.8 pmp in 2006. The prevalence of positive HBSAg and HCV Abs decreased from 3.8% and 14.4% in 1999 to 2.6% and 4.5% in 2006, respectively. Regarding the genotype distribution in Iran, no one was found with genotype 2. On the subject of decreasing HBV infection, our next strategy should be mandatory vaccination in dialysis centers and in the pre-ESRD period. Concerning HCV infection prevention, 2 approaches may be recommended: the first is decrease of duration of the hemodialysis period by possible early transplantation of suitable patients. The next is a strictly enforced isolation policy for HCV-positive patients, which may play a role in limiting HCV transmission in HD units, and universal precaution in dialysis units should be under constant close surveillance.