The effect of in-stent restenosis on hemodialysis access patency

Classifications of haemodialysis vascular access stenosis: a scoping review

OBJECTIVES

Vascular access (VA) stenoses play a significant role in the morbidity of the haemodialysed population. Classifications for diagnosis, assessment and proposal of treatment strategies can be useful clinical and methodological tools. This review aims to present a comprehensive summary and propose further methodological approaches.

DESIGN

A systematic review of the literature, evaluating classifications for dialysis-related VA stenosis.

DATA SOURCES

Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, Google Scholar and the ClinicalTrials.gov registry were searched from inception to 7 December 2024.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

All articles containing classifications regarding dialysis VA were eligible, with no restrictions on the study type or language of the full text.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two independent researchers performed the search and initial screening. Four vascular surgeons assessed the included classifications using a modified Buchbinder's critical appraisal tool to evaluate quality.

RESULTS

From 4771 screened papers, 59 full-text papers were retrieved and 24 articles contained classifications. Three classifications were dedicated to VA stenosis, all based on the anatomical location of lesions. According to the modified Buchbinder's appraisal, the classifications were assessed as moderate-to-good quality. The literature disposes of immense inconsistency in terms of the definition of significant stenosis indicated for treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

VA significant stenosis and its classification is a non-uniformly understood issue with many different criteria and categorisations. This basic methodological problem leads to inconsistent results. We recommend the unification of the criteria and their validation in prospective studies.

Variables Leading to Usage of Alteplase Versus Heparin Lock in Patients With Tunneled Catheters in Hemodialysis Care Project Centers, Saudi Arabia

INTRODUCTION

A hemodialysis tunneled catheter is one option for vascular access used with hemodialysis patients; however, catheter complications such as thrombosis are still inevitable. To prevent thrombosis formation, a catheter-locking solution is instilled between dialysis sessions. Heparin is used as a default locking solution in our Hemodialysis Care Project centers, while a recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) such as alteplase is used to treat suspected catheter thrombosis. This study aimed to identify the clinical factors, catheter brands, and hemodialysis variables that influence the choice of use for alteplase versus heparin, for those patients with tunneled catheters, and reduce overprescribing of high-alert medication alteplase.

METHODS

A retrospective medical chart review study was conducted involving 230 patients with tunneled catheters; the first group of 133 patients used alteplase regularly three times a week, while the second group of 97 patients completed at least one year using the same catheter access with heparin lock only.

RESULTS

Multivariate logistic regression and logistic regression analysis showed a significant association (p < 0.05) between different variables. Results suggest that overweight and hyperlipidemia patients are more likely to use alteplase. Patients using brand-name catheters such as Hemostar/Vas-cath (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ) are less likely to use heparin than those using Medcomp catheters (Medcomp, Yuma, AZ). In addition, patients having a history of angioplasty would be less likely to have heparin than no angioplasty. Moreover, if the patient's fluid removal were equal to or less than 2 kg, they would be more likely to use heparin and vice versa.

CONCLUSION

The study postulates that identified variables affect whether alteplase or heparin is used in hemodialysis tunneled catheters, and may be useful to increase awareness, improve practices, or judiciously control the use of alteplase within Saudi Arabia and globally.

A surgical method to be reminded for the treatment of symptomatic ipsilateral central venous occlusions in patients with hemodialysis access: Axillo-axillary venous bypass case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

In this case report, we present two chronic hemodialysis patients with upper extremity swelling due to central venous occlusions together with their clinical presentation, surgical management and brief review of the literature.

METHODS

The first patient who was a 63-year-old female patient with a history of multiple bilateral arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) was referred to our clinic. Physical examination demonstrated a functioning right brachio-cephalic AVF, with severe edema of the right arm, dilated venous collaterals, facial edema, and unilateral breast enlargement. In her history, multiple ipsilateral subclavian venous catheterizations were present for sustaining temporary hemodialysis access. The second patient was a 47-year-old male with a history of failed renal transplant, CABG surgery, multiple AV fistula procedures from both extremities, leg amputation caused by peripheral arterial disease, and decreased myocardial functions. He was receiving 3/7 hemodialysis and admitted to our clinic with right arm edema, accompanied by pain, stiffness, and skin hyperpigmentation symptoms ipsilateral to a functioning brachio-basilic AVF. He was not able to flex his arms, elbow, or wrist due to severe edema.

RESULTS

Venography revealed right subclavian vein stenosis with patent contralateral central veins in the first patient. She underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) twice with subsequent re-occlusions. After failed attempts of PTA, the patient was scheduled for axillo-axillary venous bypass in order to preserve the AV access function. In second patient, venography revealed right subclavian vein occlusion caused secondary to the subclavian venous catheters. Previous attempts for percutaneously crossing the chronic subclavian lesion failed multiple times by different centers. Hence, the patient was scheduled for axillo-axillary venous bypass surgery.

CONCLUSION

In case of chronic venous occlusions, endovascular procedures may be ineffective. Since preserving the vascular access function is crucial in this particular patient population, venous bypass procedures should be kept in mind as an alternative for central venous reconstruction, before deciding on ligation and relocation of the AVF.

The role of stents in hemodialysis vascular access

Vascular access is the Achilles' heel of dialysis therapy among patient with end stage kidney disease. The development of neointimal hyperplasia and subsequent stenosis is common in vascular access and is associated with significant morbidity. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty using balloon inflation was the standard therapy of these lesions. However, the balloon-based approaches were associated with poor vascular access patency rate necessitating new inventions. It is within this context that different types of stents were developed in order to improve the overall dialysis vascular access functionality. In this article, we review the available literature regarding the use of stents in treating dialysis vascular access stenotic lesions. Further, we review the major clinical trials of stent use in different anatomic locations and in different clinical scenarios.

Unilateral jugular vein stenosis in five horses and experience with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty

BACKGROUND

Venous stenosis, a possible cause of jugular dilatation and congestion, is well known in human medicine but has poorly been described in horses.

OBJECTIVE

To report unilateral jugular vein stenosis as a cause of jugular vein dilatation in horses and describe treatment by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA).

STUDY DESIGN

Case report.

METHODS

Details of horses diagnosed with unilateral jugular stenosis were retrieved from medical records.

RESULTS

Five horses were presented with a non-painful, unilateral dilatation of the jugular vein of which two horses showed headshaking during exercise. In one horse an indwelling catheter had been used and jugular dilatation developed 4 weeks later. In the other horses, no intravenous injections had been administered in the months before jugular dilatation developed. Ultrasonographic examination revealed venous stenosis in all horses approximately 5-10 cm cranial to the thoracic inlet. The internal diameter at the level of this stenosis was only 1-3.1 mm. The length of the stenosis was about 15-19 mm with a markedly thickened intima and media on ultrasonography. After enoxaparin treatment, PTA was performed in three horses. During the procedure the stenotic vein was dilated three times with progressively increasing pressures up to 12 atm. The stenotic diameter increased to a maximum of 4.9 mm with improved jugular blood flow. Aftercare included anti-inflammatory and anti-thrombotic therapy.

CONCLUSION

Jugular vein stenosis occurs in horses and should be included in the differential diagnoses of unilateral jugular vein dilatation. It may present in the absence of previous intravenous treatment. PTA of the jugular vein is feasible to improve jugular blood flow.

Drug Coated Balloons for Dysfunctional Haemodialysis Venous Access: A Patient Level Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

To perform an individual patient data level meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing drug coated balloon angioplasty (DCB) against conventional percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in the treatment of dysfunctional haemodialysis venous access.

METHODS

A search was conducted from inception to 13 November 2020. Kaplan-Meier curves comparing DCB with PTA by target lesion primary patency (TLPP) and access circuit primary patency (ACPP) were graphically reconstructed to retrieve patient level data. One stage meta-analyses with Cox models with random effects shared frailties were conducted to determine hazard ratios (HRs). Dynamic restricted mean survival times (RMST) were conducted in view of violation of the proportional hazards assumption. Conventional two stage meta-analyses and network meta-analyses under random effects Frequentist models were conducted to determine overall and comparative outcomes of paclitaxel concentrations used. Where outliers were consistently detected through outlier and influence analyses, sensitivity analyses excluding those studies were conducted.

RESULTS

Among 10 RCTs (1 207 patients), HRs across all models favoured DCB (one stage shared frailty HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.53 - 0.73, p < .001; two stage random effects HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.42 - 0.86, p = .018, I² = 65%) for TLPP. Evidence of time varying effects (p = .005) was found. TLPP RMST was + 3.54 months (25.0%) longer in DCB treated patients compared with PTA (p = .001) at three years. TLPP at six months, one year, and two years was 75.3% vs. 58.1%, 51.1% vs. 37.1%, and 31.4% vs. 26.0% for DCB and PTA, respectively. The P-Scores within the Frequentist network meta-analysis suggest that higher concentrations of paclitaxel were associated with better TLPP and ACPP. Among six RCTs (854 patients), the one stage model favoured DCB (shared frailty HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.60 - 0.87, p < .001) for ACPP. Conversely, the two stage random effects model demonstrated no significant difference (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.35 - 1.67, p = .41, I² = 81%). Sensitivity analysis excluding outliers significantly favoured DCB (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.41 - 0.91, p = .027, I² = 62%).

CONCLUSION

Overall evidence suggests that DCB is favoured over PTA in TLPP and ACPP.

Comparison of Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty with Stenting for Treatment of Central Venous Stenosis or Occlusion in Hemodialysis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

A common cause of hemodialysis vascular access dysfunction, a primary cause of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing hemodialysis, is central venous stenosis or occlusion. The present study compared percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stent placement (PTS) for treatment of central venous stenosis or central vein occlusion in hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted using database searches of PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase. Articles were selected using the Population/Intervention/Comparator/Outcomes (PICO) process. Outcomes included the rate of procedural success, primary patency, assisted primary patency, re-intervention subjects, re-intervention rate, and adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of eight studies were included in the meta-analysis with subjects in the PTA group (n = 281) or PTS group (n = 192). Primary patency rate between PTA and PTS groups at 3-, 6-, 12-, or 24-month follow-up was not different (all p > 0.05). Patients treated with PTA had greater assisted primary patency rates than the PTS group (OR = 1.03, 1.73, 1.03, and 2.00 at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively). However, the statistical assessment only showed significantly at 24-month follow-up (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The present meta-analysis revealed that, compared to PTS, PTA may provide increased assisted primary patency for endovascular treatment of central vein stenosis or occlusion in patients undergoing hemodialysis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3a.

Use of the Viabahn stent graft for the treatment of recurrent cephalic arch stenosis in hemodialysis accesses

OBJECTIVE

Cephalic arch stenosis (CAS) is a frequent and challenging failure mode of brachiocephalic fistulas. Natural tortuosity of the cephalic arch requires special consideration in selecting a treatment modality. Typical percutaneous angioplasty and bare-metal stent (BMS) treatments provide a short-term treatment solution for CAS without a durable effect. This study assessed Viabahn (W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz) stent grafts (SGs) as a first-line percutaneous option to provide a durable treatment for CAS.

METHODS

SG data were collected at a free-standing physician office between July 10, 2009, and January 26, 2011. A single-arm, prospective, observational study was conducted of 50 consecutive CAS patients treated with angioplasty followed by deployment of Viabahn SGs. Outcomes included target lesion primary patency and reintervention rates as well as secondary access patency. Results were compared with historic cohorts of percutaneous balloon angioplasty (N = 50) and angioplasty followed by BMS deployment (N = 50). The cohorts were treated between May 5, 2005, and May 20, 2010, and assessed in chronologic order.

RESULTS

The SG cohort target lesion primary patency reported at 3, 6, and 12 months was 90% ± 7%, 74% ± 12%, and 60% ± 14% (±95% confidence interval), respectively. Compared with historic cohorts, the SG cohort demonstrated statistically superior target lesion primary patency (P < .001), with a reduced reintervention rate per access-year (P < .001). Secondary access patency was statistically superior compared with the percutaneous balloon angioplasty cohort (P = .034) but not statistically different from the BMS cohort when assessed during a 2.5-year period. The secondary access patency for the SG cohort at 5 years was 80% ± 15%.

CONCLUSIONS

In treatment of a CAS, the Viabahn SG study group demonstrated superior target lesion primary patency and required fewer subsequent interventions compared with historic cohorts treated with angioplasty or angioplasty followed by BMS placement. Given the significant improvement in target lesion primary patency, future studies should challenge Viabahn SGs as a primary percutaneous treatment modality vs durable surgical alternatives.

Treatment of central venous in-stent restenosis with repeat stent deployment in hemodialysis patients

Purpose

To report patency rates for stent deployment for treatment of in-stent stenosis of the central veins of the chest in hemodialysis patients.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on 29 patients who underwent 35 secondary percutaneous transluminal stent (PTS) deployments for in-stent stenosis within the central veins that were refractory to angioplasty and ipsilateral to a functioning hemodialysis access (in-stent PTS group). For comparison, patency data were acquired for 47 patients who underwent 78 successful percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) procedures for in-stent stenosis (in-stent PTA group) and 55 patients who underwent 55 stent deployments within native central vein stenosis refractory to angioplasty (native vein PTS group).

Results

The 3-, 6-, and 12-month primary lesion patency for the in-stent PTS group was 73%, 57%, and 32%, respectively. The 3-, 6-, and 12-month primary patency for the in-stent PTA group was 70%, 38%, and 17% and for the native vein PTS group was 78%, 57%, and 26%, which were similar to the in-stent PTS group (p = 0.20 and 0.41, respectively). The 3-, 6-, and 12-month secondary access patency was 91%, 73%, and 65% for the in-stent PTS group. Sub-analysis of the in-stent PTS group revealed no difference in primary (p = 0.93) or secondary patency rates (p = 0.27) of bare metal stents (n = 23) compared with stent grafts (n = 12).

Conclusions

Stent deployment for central vein in-stent stenosis refractory to angioplasty was associated with reasonable patency rates, which were similar to in-stent PTA and native vein PTS.

Endovascular Stent Placement for Hemodialysis Arteriovenous Access Stenosis

This study aims to report the outcomes of nitinol and polytetrafluoroethylene covered stent placement to treat hemodialysis arteriovenous access stenosis at a single center over a five-year period. Clinical and radiological information was reviewed retrospectively. Poststent primary and secondary patency rates were determined using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Ten clinical variables were subjected to multivariate Cox regression analysis to determine predictors of patency after stent placement. During the study period 60 stents were deployed in 45 patients, with a mean follow-up of 24.5 months. The clinical and anatomical success rate was 98.3% (59/60). Poststent primary patency rates at 6, 12, and 24 months were 64%, 46%, and 35%, respectively. Poststent secondary patency rates at 6, 12, and 24 months were 95%, 89%, and 85%, respectively. Stent placement for upper arm lesions and in access less than 12 months of age was associated with reduced primary patency (adjusted hazards ratio [HR] 5.1, p = 0.0084, and HR 3.5, p = 0.0029, resp.). Resistant or recurrent stenosis can be successfully treated by endovascular stent placement with durable long-term patency, although multiple procedures are often required. Stent placement for upper arm lesions and in arteriovenous access less than 12 months of age was associated with increased risk of patency loss.

Clinical Outcome of Overlapping Stents in Hemodialysis Access

Purpose

Endovascular stents have recently been shown to extend access patency in thrombosed and stenotic arteriovenous grafts. Given this improved patency, stent placement has outpaced balloon angioplasty in hemodialysis (HD) access interventions. However, concern remains over localized corrosion and increased neointimal hyperplasia of overlapping stents in the access circuit and whether this promotes premature stent failure.

Methods

This is a retrospective analysis of HD patients referred for access dysfunction during a 2-yr period. Using a prospectively collected, vascular access database, we identified 76 patients seen for follow-up angiography due to access dysfunction after stent placement. We compared the outcomes of overlapping vs. non-overlapping stents in measured primary assisted patency and mean percent luminal diameter as a marker of lesion severity.

Results

The two groups did not differ significantly in demographics or comorbid conditions. Only gender had a significant discrepancy between the two groups, with 65.5% vs. 42.9% male (p=0.01) in the overlapping vs. non-overlapping stent groups, respectively. The mean percent luminal stenosis was found to be 83.7 ± 17.3 and 85.5 ± 12.6 (p=0.55) for the overlapping vs. non-overlapping stent groups, respectively. For overlapping and non-overlapping stents, 30-day primary patency was 94% and 89%, respectively, 60-day primary patency was 77% and 63%, respectively, and 90-day primary patency was 68% and 50%, respectively. Using multiple regression analysis, no risk factors were identified to be associated with the severity of luminal stenosis. No identifiable risk factors were found to be associated with improved primary patency. In particular, overlapping vs. non-overlapping stents were not identified as a statistically significant factor influencing primary (assisted) patency (hazards ratio 0.60; 95% cI 0.34 to 1.06; p>0.05).

Conclusions

This study provides evidence that the theoretical concern of metal on metal corrosion and increased neointimal hyperplasia that can be seen with overlapping stents does not play a significant clinical role.