1
|
Murea M, Raimann JG, Divers J, Maute H, Kovach C, Abdel-Rahman EM, Awad AS, Flythe JE, Gautam SC, Niyyar VD, Roberts GV, Jefferson NM, Shahidul I, Nwaozuru U, Foley KL, Trembath EJ, Rosales ML, Fletcher AJ, Hiba SI, Huml A, Knicely DH, Hasan I, Makadia B, Gaurav R, Lea J, Conway PT, Daugirdas JT, Kotanko P. Comparative effectiveness of an individualized model of hemodialysis vs conventional hemodialysis: a study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial (the TwoPlus trial). Trials 2024; 25:424. [PMID: 38943204 PMCID: PMC11212207 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08281-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 06/20/2024] [Indexed: 07/01/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most patients starting chronic in-center hemodialysis (HD) receive conventional hemodialysis (CHD) with three sessions per week targeting specific biochemical clearance. Observational studies suggest that patients with residual kidney function can safely be treated with incremental prescriptions of HD, starting with less frequent sessions and later adjusting to thrice-weekly HD. This trial aims to show objectively that clinically matched incremental HD (CMIHD) is non-inferior to CHD in eligible patients. METHODS An unblinded, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial will be conducted across diverse healthcare systems and dialysis organizations in the USA. Adult patients initiating chronic hemodialysis (HD) at participating centers will be screened. Eligibility criteria include receipt of fewer than 18 treatments of HD and residual kidney function defined as kidney urea clearance ≥3.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 and urine output ≥500 mL/24 h. The 1:1 randomization, stratified by site and dialysis vascular access type, assigns patients to either CMIHD (intervention group) or CHD (control group). The CMIHD group will be treated with twice-weekly HD and adjuvant pharmacologic therapy (i.e., oral loop diuretics, sodium bicarbonate, and potassium binders). The CHD group will receive thrice-weekly HD according to usual care. Throughout the study, patients undergo timed urine collection and fill out questionnaires. CMIHD will progress to thrice-weekly HD based on clinical manifestations or changes in residual kidney function. Caregivers of enrolled patients are invited to complete semi-annual questionnaires. The primary outcome is a composite of patients' all-cause death, hospitalizations, or emergency department visits at 2 years. Secondary outcomes include patient- and caregiver-reported outcomes. We aim to enroll 350 patients, which provides ≥85% power to detect an incidence rate ratio (IRR) of 0.9 between CMIHD and CHD with an IRR non-inferiority of 1.20 (α = 0.025, one-tailed test, 20% dropout rate, average of 2.06 years of HD per patient participant), and 150 caregiver participants (of enrolled patients). DISCUSSION Our proposal challenges the status quo of HD care delivery. Our overarching hypothesis posits that CMIHD is non-inferior to CHD. If successful, the results will positively impact one of the highest-burdened patient populations and their caregivers. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05828823. Registered on 25 April 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariana Murea
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Nephrology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
| | | | - Jasmin Divers
- Department of Foundations of Medicine, Center for Population and Health Services Research, NYU Grossman Long Island School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Harvey Maute
- Department of Foundations of Medicine, Center for Population and Health Services Research, NYU Grossman Long Island School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Cassandra Kovach
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Emaad M Abdel-Rahman
- Division of Nephrology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Alaa S Awad
- Division of Nephrology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Jennifer E Flythe
- University of North Carolina (UNC) Kidney Center, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Samir C Gautam
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Vandana D Niyyar
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Glenda V Roberts
- External Relations and Patient Engagement, Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Kidney Research Institute and Center for Dialysis Innovation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Islam Shahidul
- Department of Foundations of Medicine, Center for Population and Health Services Research, NYU Grossman Long Island School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ucheoma Nwaozuru
- Department of Implementation Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Kristie L Foley
- Department of Implementation Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Alison J Fletcher
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Nephrology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Sheikh I Hiba
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Nephrology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Anne Huml
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Daphne H Knicely
- Division of Nephrology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Irtiza Hasan
- Division of Nephrology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | | - Raman Gaurav
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Janice Lea
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Paul T Conway
- American Association of Kidney Patients, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - John T Daugirdas
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Peter Kotanko
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Nephrology, LLC Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li HL, Tai PH, Hwang YT, Lin SW, Lan LC. Causes of Hospitalization among End-Stage Kidney Disease Cohort before and after Hemodialysis. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:10253. [PMID: 36011888 PMCID: PMC9408097 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191610253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Revised: 08/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) have a greater risk of comorbidities, including diabetes and anemia, and have higher hospital admission rates than patients with other diseases. The cause of hospital admissions is associated with ESKD prognosis. This retrospective cohort study involved patients with ESKD who received hemodialysis and investigated whether the cause of hospital admission changed before versus after they started hemodialysis. This study recruited 592 patients with ESKD who received hemodialysis at any period between January 2005 and November 2017 and had been assigned the International Classification of Diseases Ninth Revision Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) code for ESKD. The patients' demographic data and hospitalization status one year before and two years after they received hemodialysis were analyzed. A McNemar test was conducted to analyze the diagnostic changes from before to after hemodialysis in patients with ESKD. The study's sample of patients with ESKD comprised more women (51.86%) than men and had an average age of 67.15 years. The numbers of patients admitted to the hospital for the following conditions all decreased significantly after they received hemodialysis: type 2 (non-insulin-dependent and adult-onset) diabetes; native atherosclerosis; urinary tract infection; gastric ulcer without mention of hemorrhage, perforation, or obstruction; pneumonia; reflux esophagitis; duodenal ulcer without mention of hemorrhage, perforation, or obstruction; and bacteremia. Most patients exhibited one or more of the following comorbidities: diabetes (n = 407, 68.75%), hypertension (n = 491, 82.94%), congestive heart failure (n = 161, 27.20%), ischemic heart disease (n = 125, 21.11%), cerebrovascular accident (n = 93, 15.71%), and gout (n = 96, 16.22%). An analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated that changes in the ICD-9-CM codes for native atherosclerosis, urinary tract infection, pneumonia, and hyperkalemia were associated with age. Patients who developed pneumonia before or after they received hemodialysis tended to be older (range: 69-70 years old). This study investigated the causes of hospital admission among patients with ESKD one year before and two years after they received hemodialysis. This study's results revealed hypertension to be the most common comorbidity. Regarding the cause of admission, pneumonia was more prevalent in older than in younger patients. Moreover, changes in the ICD-9-CM codes of native atherosclerosis, urinary tract infection, pneumonia, and hyperkalemia were significantly correlated with age. Therefore, when administering comprehensive nursing care and treatment for ESKD, clinicians should not only focus on comorbidities but also consider factors (e.g., age) that can affect patient prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsiu-Lan Li
- Department of Nursing, Yunghe Cardinal Tien Hospital, New Taipei City 23148, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Management, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City 33302, Taiwan
| | - Pei-Hui Tai
- Medical Quality Control Room, En Chu Kong Hospital, New Taipei City 23148, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Ting Hwang
- Department of Statistics, National Taipei University, New Taipei City 23148, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Wei Lin
- Department of Information Management, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City 33302, Taiwan
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Keelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung City 20641, Taiwan
- Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Ming Chi University of Technology, New Taipei City 23148, Taiwan
| | - Li-Ching Lan
- Department of Nursing, En Chu Kong Hospital, New Taipei City 23148, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kim H, Seo HM, Kim JY, Kim M. Prediction of hemodialysis vascular access failure using segmental bioimpedance analysis parameters. Int Urol Nephrol 2018; 50:947-953. [PMID: 29476433 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-018-1827-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2017] [Accepted: 02/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Segmental bioimpedance analysis (BIA) can identify fluid volume changes in the arms of patients on hemodialysis (HD) after vascular access surgery. We investigated whether the difference in fluid volumes between the arms of the patients using segmental BIA is associated with vascular access outcome. METHODS Body composition measurements were taken for 127 patients on HD with segmental, multi-frequency BIA equipment (InBody 1.0, Biospace Co. Ltd, Seoul, Korea). The difference in fluid volume between the arms of the patients was calculated from the fluid volume of the arm with the vascular access minus that of the other. The primary outcome was the loss of vascular access patency within 3 months of BIA measurement. RESULTS The median absolute and relative inter-arm fluid volume differences were 150 ml [interquartile range (IQR) 90-250 ml] and 9.6% (IQR 4.9-14.4%), respectively. Within 3 months of BIA measurement, 38 patients (30.0%) experienced vascular access failure. When the patients were divided into three groups based on the tertiles of relative inter-arm fluid volume differences (lowest tertile: < 6.8%; middle tertile: 6.8-12.7%; highest tertile: > 12.7%), greater difference in relative inter-arm fluid volume differences was associated with higher vascular access failure rates (14 vs. 28 vs. 48%, p value for trend across tertiles = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS We conclude that segmental BIA may be used as a tool that can predict vascular access failure in patients on HD by calculating the relative difference in fluid volume between the arms of the patients with and without vascular access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyunwoo Kim
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Jeju National University, Jeju National University Hospital, 15, Aran 13-gil, Jeju City, Jeju, 63241, Republic of Korea.
| | - Hye Mi Seo
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Jeju National University, Jeju National University Hospital, 15, Aran 13-gil, Jeju City, Jeju, 63241, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Young Kim
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Jeju National University, Jeju National University Hospital, 15, Aran 13-gil, Jeju City, Jeju, 63241, Republic of Korea
| | - Miyeon Kim
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Jeju National University, Jeju National University Hospital, 15, Aran 13-gil, Jeju City, Jeju, 63241, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hickson LJ, Thorsteinsdottir B, Ramar P, Reinalda MS, Crowson CS, Williams AW, Albright RC, Onuigbo MA, Rule AD, Shah ND. Hospital Readmission among New Dialysis Patients Associated with Young Age and Poor Functional Status. Nephron Clin Pract 2018; 139:1-12. [PMID: 29402792 DOI: 10.1159/000485985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2017] [Accepted: 12/01/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Over one-third of hospital discharges among dialysis patients are followed by 30-day readmission. The first year after dialysis start is a high-risk time frame. We examined the rate, causes, timing, and predictors of 30-day readmissions among adult, incident dialysis patients. METHODS Hospital readmissions were assessed from the 91st day to the 15th month after the initiation of dialysis using a Mayo Clinic registry linkage to United States Renal Data System claims during the period January 2001-December 2010. RESULTS Among 1,727 patients with ≥1 hospitalization, 532 (31%) had ≥1, and 261 (15%) had ≥2 readmissions. Readmission rate was 1.1% per person-day post-discharge, and the highest rates (2.5% per person-day) occurred ≤5 days after index admission. The overall cumulative readmission rate was 33.8% at day 30. Common readmission diagnoses included cardiac issues (22%), vascular disorders (19%), and infection (13%). Similar-cause readmissions to index hospitalization were more common during days 0-14 post-discharge than days 15-30 (37.5 vs. 22.9%; p = 0.004). Younger age at dialysis initiation, inability to transfer/ambulate, serum creatinine ≤5.3 mg/dL, higher number of previous hospitalizations, and longer duration on dialysis were associated with higher readmission rates in multivariable analyses. Patients aged 18-39 were few (8.3%) but comprised 17.7% of "high-readmission" users such that a 30-year-old patient had an 87% chance of being readmitted within 30 days of any hospital discharge, whereas an 80-year-old patient had a 25% chance. CONCLUSIONS Overall, 30-day readmissions are common within the first year of dialysis start. The first 10-day period after discharge, young patients, and those with poor functional status represent key areas for targeted interventions to reduce readmissions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- LaTonya J Hickson
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.,Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Bjorg Thorsteinsdottir
- Division of Primary Care Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.,Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Priya Ramar
- Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.,Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Megan S Reinalda
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.,Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Cynthia S Crowson
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.,Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Amy W Williams
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Robert C Albright
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Macaulay A Onuigbo
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Health System, Eau Claire, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Andrew D Rule
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.,Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Nilay D Shah
- Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.,Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Effectiveness of beraprost sodium in maintaining vascular access patency in patients on hemodialysis. Int Urol Nephrol 2017; 49:1287-1295. [DOI: 10.1007/s11255-017-1586-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2017] [Accepted: 04/05/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
6
|
Parker K, Zhang X, Lewin A, MacRae JM. The association between intradialytic exercise and hospital usage among hemodialysis patients. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2015; 40:371-8. [DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2014-0326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Hemodialysis (HD) patients have high hospitalization rates. Benefits of intradialytic exercise have been proven in numerous studies yet exercise programs are still rarely used in the treatment of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Our objective was to determine if there was an association between a 6-month intradialytic bicycling program and hospitalization rates and length of stay (LOS) in ESKD patients. This was a retrospective cohort study that took place 6 months prior to and 6 months during an intradialtyic exercise program at an outpatient HD unit in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Participants comprised 102 patients who had commenced HD <6 months (incident) or >6 months (prevalent) prior to starting exercise. The intervention comprised a 6-month intradialytic bicycling program. Main outcome measures were hospitalization rate, cause of hospitalization, and LOS. Patients were predominantly male (67.6%) aged 65.6 ± 13.5 years and median HD vintage 1 year (range: 0–12). Comorbidities included diabetes mellitus (50%) and cardiac disease (38.2%). The hospitalization incidence rate ratio (IRR) was 0.48 (0.23–0.98; P = 0.04) in incident and 0.89 (0.56–1.42; P = 0.64) in prevalent patients. The LOS decreased from 7.8 (95% confidence interval (CI): 7.3–8.4) to 3.1 (95% CI: 2.8–3.4) days and LOS IRR was 0.39 (0.35–0.45; P < 0.001). The main predictors of hospitalization were lower albumin levels (P = 0.007) and lack of intradialytic exercise program participation (P < 0.001). In conclusion, 6 months of intradialytic exercise was associated with decreased LOS in both incident and prevalent HD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen Parker
- Southern Alberta Renal Program, South Calgary Hemodialysis, 31 Sunpark Plaza SE, Calgary, AB T2X 3W5, Canada
| | - Xin Zhang
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - Adriane Lewin
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - Jennifer M. MacRae
- Division of Nephrology and Department of Cardiac Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Schoonover KL, Hickson LJ, Norby SM, Hogan MC, Chaudhary S, Albright RC, Dillon JJ, McCarthy JT, Williams AW. Risk factors for hospitalization among older, incident haemodialysis patients. Nephrology (Carlton) 2014; 18:712-7. [PMID: 23848358 DOI: 10.1111/nep.12129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/06/2013] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
AIMS The number of elderly persons with end-stage renal disease is increasing with many requiring hospitalizations. This study examines the causes and predictors of hospitalization in older haemodialysis patients. METHODS We reviewed hospitalizations of older (≥65 years) incident chronic haemodialysis patients initiating therapy between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2009 under the care of a single Midwestern United States dialysis provider. RESULTS Of 125 patients, the mean age was 76 ± 7 years and 72% were male. At first dialysis, 68% used a central venous catheter (CVC) and 51% were in the hospital. Mean follow-up was 1.8 ± 1.0 years. At least one hospitalization occurred in 89 (71%) patients and half of all patients were hospitalized once within the first 223 days. Total hospital admission rate was 1.48 per patient year with hospital days totalling 8.54 days per patient year. The three most common reasons for first admission were cardiac (33%), infection (18%) and gastrointestinal (12%). Predictors of future hospitalization included the first dialysis occurring in hospital (hazard ratios (HR) 2.1, 95% CI 1.4-3.3, P = 0.0005) and the use of a CVC at first haemodialysis (HR 2.6, CI 1.6-4.4, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION Hospitalizations are common in older incident haemodialysis patients. Access preparation and overall burden of illness leading to the initial hospitalization appear to play a role. Identification of additional factors associated with hospitalization will allow for focused interventions to reduce hospitalization rates and increase the value of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly L Schoonover
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Murea M, Moran T, Russell GB, Shihabi ZK, Byers JR, Andries L, Bleyer AJ, Freedman BI. Glycated albumin, not hemoglobin A1c, predicts cardiovascular hospitalization and length of stay in diabetic patients on dialysis. Am J Nephrol 2012; 36:488-96. [PMID: 23147746 DOI: 10.1159/000343920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2012] [Accepted: 10/02/2012] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The utility of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and glycated albumin (GA) in diabetic dialysis patients remains unknown. GA was previously associated with all-cause hospitalization and patient survival. Relationships between GA, HbA1c, and casual plasma glucose (PG) with cause-specific cardiovascular (CV) disease, infectious disease (ID), and vascular access- (VA) related hospitalization rates and length of stay (LOS) were assessed. METHODS 444 prevalent diabetic dialysis patients had monthly PG, quarterly GA, and all HbA1c values recorded for 2.33 years; hospitalizations within 17 and 30 days of testing were evaluated. Best-fit, time-dependent Cox models were constructed in unadjusted, case-mix-adjusted (age, sex, race, BMI, diabetes duration, dialysis vintage), and case-mix- plus lab-adjusted (hemoglobin, albumin, phosphorus) models. RESULTS Mean ± SD diabetes duration was 18.5 ± 10.8 years and dialysis vintage 2.9 ± 2.6 years. In fully adjusted models, CV hospitalization rates were associated with increasing GA (HR 1.32; 95% CI 1.11-1.57; p = 0.002 at 17 days; HR 1.21; p = 0.02 at 30 days) and PG (HR 1.10; 95% CI 1.02-1.17; p = 0.01 at 17 days; HR 1.07; p = 0.03 at 30 days), not HbA1c (HR 1.24; 95% CI 0.89-1.73; p = 0.21 at 17 days; HR 1.26; p = 0.10 at 30 days). LOS for CV admissions was positively associated with GA (HR 1.18; 95% CI 1.01-1.39; p = 0.03), not PG (HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.99-1.10; p = 0.15) or HbA1c (HR 1.03; 95% CI 0.92-1.15; p = 0.21). Admissions due to ID and VA complications (and LOS) did not correlate with these assays. CONCLUSIONS Improved glycemic control based on GA and PG predicted CV-related hospitalizations; GA also predicted CV hospitalization LOS. HbA1c did not predict cause-specific hospitalizations in dialysis populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariana Murea
- Department of Internal Medicine-Nephrology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
GABALDON D, XU Z, SUN Y, SERVILLA KS, HARTSHORNE MF, TZAMALOUKAS AH. Hemodialysis catheter infection with unusual presentation and grave outcome. Hemodial Int 2011; 15:568-72. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-4758.2011.00584.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2011] [Revised: 06/01/2011] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|