Possible short-term amelioration of basilar plaque by high-dose atorvastatin: use of reductase inhibitors for intracranial plaque stabilization

Statin and aspirin therapy are associated with decreased rates of choroidal neovascularization among patients with age-related macular degeneration

PURPOSE

To investigate the relationship between statin and aspirin use and the risk of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

DESIGN

Retrospective consecutive case series.

METHODS

All patients 60 years and older with AMD who were seen between January 1, 1990, and March 1, 2003, at the San Francisco Veterans Affairs Hospital Eye Clinic with fundus photographs were included. Patients with other diagnoses predisposing to CNV or incomplete medical records were excluded. The main outcome measure was angiographically evident CNV. Diagnosis was based on review of fundus photographs and fluorescein angiograms in masked fashion; medical records were reviewed for variables possibly predisposing to CNV or statin use. For patients with CNV, age of onset was recorded; those without CNV were treated as censored. Age-related macular degeneration disease status and time of onset of CNV was compared between patients treated or not treated with statins for at least 6 months.

RESULTS

Of 326 patients with AMD, 104 had CNV, 204 had dry AMD, and 18 had geographic atrophy (GA). Of CNV subjects, 21 (20%) used statins, compared with 77 (38%) of dry AMD subjects without GA and 6 (33%) of controls with GA (hazard ratio = 0.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.31-0.86, P =.01). Aspirin use was also significantly associated with decreased rates of CNV; 62 CNV subjects (60%) used aspirin, compared with 154 (75%) dry AMD subjects without GA or 12 (67%) with GA (hazard ratio = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.40-0.98, P =.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Therapy with statins or aspirin is associated with decreased rates of CNV among AMD patients. Additional study with a prospective and/or randomized trial of statin and aspirin use in AMD patients is warranted.

Comparison of periprocedure complications resulting from direct stent placement compared with those due to conventional and staged stent placement in the basilar artery

OBJECT

Medically refractory, symptomatic atherosclerotic disease of the basilar artery (BA) portends a poor prognosis. Studies have shown morbidity rates following placement of stents in these lesions to be quite variable, ranging from 0 to 30%. The authors review their experience with BA stent placement for severe atherosclerotic disease to determine whether an increase in neurological morbidity is associated with direct stent placement (that performed without predilation angioplasty) compared with conventional stent placement (that performed immediately after predilation angioplasty) or staged stent placement (angioplasty followed > or = 1 month later by stent placement with or without repeated angioplasty).

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed the medical records from a consecutive series of 10 patients who underwent stent placement for medically refractory, symptomatic atherosclerotic disease of the BA between February 1999 and November 2002. Patient records were analyzed for symptoms at presentation, percentage of angiographically visible stenosis, devices used, procedure-related morbidity, and clinical and radiographic outcomes. Patients with symptomatic intracranial vertebral artery stenosis but without concomitant severe (> 50%) BA stenosis were excluded from the study. Four patients were treated with direct stent placement, three with a staged procedure (these were included in a previous publication), and three with conventional stent placement. In the group treated with direct stent placement, a dense quadriparesis developed in two patients after the procedure. Computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging revealed infarction of the ventral pons in these patients. In the staged stent placement group, no permanent neurological complications occurred after the procedure and, in the conventional stent placement group, one of three patients experienced a neurological complication involving homonymous hemianopsia.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct stent placement in the BA is associated with a relatively high complication rate, compared with a staged procedure. Complications may result from an embolic shower following disruption of atheromatous plaque debris attained using high-profile devices such as stents, as demonstrated by the postoperative imaging appearance of acute pontine infarctions. Additionally, displacement of debris by the stent into the ostia (snowplowing) of small brainstem perforating vessels may be responsible for the complications noted. Although direct stent placement in peripheral and coronary vessels has been shown to be safe, the authors suggest that direct stent placement in the BA should be avoided to minimize the risk of periprocedure morbidity.

Staged stent-assisted angioplasty for symptomatic intracranial vertebrobasilar artery stenosis

OBJECT

Medically refractory symptomatic vertebrobasilar atherosclerotic disease has a poor prognosis. Studies have shown that longer (> or = 10 mm), eccentric, high-grade (> 70%) stenoses portend increased procedure-related morbidity. The authors reviewed their experience to determine whether a staged procedure consisting of angioplasty followed by delayed (> or = 1 month later) repeated angioplasty and stent placement reduces the morbidity associated with endovascular treatment of symptomatic basilar and/or intracranial vertebral artery (VA) stenoses.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed the medical records in a consecutive series of eight patients who underwent planned stent-assisted angioplasty for medically refractory, symptomatic atherosclerotic disease of the intracranial posterior circulation between February 1999 and January 2002. Staged stent-assisted angioplasty was planned for these patients because the extent and degree of stenosis of the VA and/or basilar artery (BA) lesion portended an excessive procedure-related risk. The degree of stenosis, recent onset of symptoms (unstable plaque), vessel tortuosity, and lesion length and morphological feaures were contributing factors in determining procedure-related risk. Patient records were analyzed for location and degree of stenosis, preprocedural regimen of antiplatelet and/or anticoagulation agents, devices used, procedure-related complications, and clinical and radiographic outcomes. Among the patients in whom staged stent-assisted angioplasty was planned, vessel dissection, which necessitated immediate stent placement, occurred during passage of the balloon in one of them. In a second patient, the stent could not be maneuvered through the tortuous VA. In a third patient, the VA and BAs remained widely patent after angioplasty alone, and therefore stent placement was not required. Significant complications among the eight patients included transient aphasia and hemiparesis in one and a groin hematoma that necessitated surgical intervention in another; there was no permanent neurological morbidity. The mean stenosis before treatment was 78%, which fell to 54% after angioplasty, and the mean residual stenosis after stent placement was 30%. At the last follow-up examination, none of the treated patients had further symptoms attributable to the treated stenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel combination of initial angioplasty followed by delayed endoluminal stent placement may reduce the neurological morbidity associated with endovascular treatment of long, high-grade stenotic lesions. Attempting to cross high-grade stenoses with higher-profile devices such as stents may result in an embolic shower. Furthermore, neointimal proliferation and scar formation after angioplasty result in a thickened fibrous layer, which may be protective during delayed stent deployment. Larger-scale studies involving multiple centers are needed to elucidate further the lesion morphological characteristics and patient population most likely to benefit from staged procedures.