If you've seen one EMS system, you've seen one EMS system

Prehospital transport and termination of resuscitation of cardiac arrest patients: A review of prehospital care protocols in the United States

Background

The objective was to describe emergency medical services (EMS) protocol variability in transport expectations for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients and the involvement of online medical control for on-scene termination of resuscitation in the United States. Whether other aspects of OHCA care were mentioned, including the definition of a "pediatric" patient, and use of end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring, mechanical chest compression devices (MCCDs), and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), were also described.

Methods and Results

Review of EMS protocols publicly accessible from https://www.emsprotocols.org and through searches on the internet when protocols were unavailable on the website from June 2021 to January 2022. Frequencies and proportions were used to describe outcomes. Of 104 protocols reviewed, 51.9% state to initiate transport after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), 26.0% do not specify when to initiate transport, and 6.7% state to transport after ≥20 minutes of on-scene cardiopulmonary resuscitation for adults. For pediatric patients, 38.5% of protocols do not specify when to initiate transport, 32.7% state to transport after ROSC, and 10.6% state to transport as soon as possible. Most protocols (42.3%) did not specify the age that defines "pediatric" in cardiac arrest. More than half (51.9%) of the protocols require online medical control for termination of resuscitation. Most protocols mention the use of end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring (81.7%), 50.0% mention the use of MCCDs, and 4.8% mention ECMO for cardiac arrest.

Conclusions

In the United States, EMS protocols for initiation of transport and termination of resuscitation for OHCA patients are highly variable.

Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Improving Partnerships with Emergency Medical Services

Emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians increasingly encounter seriously ill patients and their caregivers in times of distress. When crises arise or care coordination falls short, these high-stakes interactions highlight opportunities to improve care experience and outcomes. Efforts must address wide educational gaps, absence of specialized care protocols, and systematic fragmentation leading to hyperlocal practice. The authors represent cross-sectional expertise in palliative care and EMS. This article describes unmet needs at the EMS-palliative interface, challenges with collaboration, and where directional progress exists.

A predictive ambulance dispatch algorithm to the scene of a motor vehicle crash: the search for optimal over and under triage rates

Background

Calls for emergency medical assistance at the scene of a motor vehicle crash (MVC) substantially contribute to the demand on ambulance services. Triage by emergency medical dispatch systems is therefore important, to ensure the right care is provided to the right patient, in the right amount of time. A lights and sirens (L&S) response is the highest priority ambulance response, also known as a priority one or hot response. In this context, over triage is defined as dispatching an ambulance with lights and sirens (L&S) to a low acuity MVC and under triage is not dispatching an ambulance with L&S to those who require urgent medical care. We explored the potential for crash characteristics to be used during emergency ambulance calls to identify those MVCs that required a L&S response.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using ambulance and police data from 2014 to 2016. The predictor variables were crash characteristics (e.g. road surface), and Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS) dispatch codes. The outcome variable was the need for a L&S ambulance response. A Chi-square Automatic Interaction Detector technique was used to develop decision trees, with over/under triage rates determined for each tree. The model with an under/over triage rate closest to that prescribed by the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (ACS COT) will be deemed to be the best model (under triage rate of ≤ 5% and over triage rate of between 25–35%.

Results

The decision tree with a 2.7% under triage rate was closest to that specified by the ACS COT, had as predictors—MPDS codes, trapped, vulnerable road user, anyone aged 75 + , day of the week, single versus multiple vehicles, airbag deployment, atmosphere, surface, lighting and accident type. This model had an over triage rate of 84.8%.

Conclusions

We were able to derive a model with a reasonable under triage rate, however this model also had a high over triage rate. Individual EMS may apply the findings here to their own jurisdictions when dispatching to the scene of a MVC.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12873-022-00609-5.

Characteristics of statewide protocols for emergency medical services in the United States

OBJECTIVE

We sought to categorize and characterize the utilization of statewide emergency medical services (EMS) protocols as well as state recognition of specialty receiving facilities for trauma and time-sensitive conditions in the United States.

METHODS

A survey of all state EMS offices was conducted to determine which states use mandatory or model statewide EMS protocols and to characterize these protocols based on the process for authorizing such protocols. The survey also inquired as to which states formally recognize specialty receiving facilities for trauma, STEMI, stroke, cardiac arrest, and burn as well as whether or not states have mandatory or model statewide destination protocols for these specialty centers.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight states were found to have either mandatory or model statewide EMS protocols. Twenty-one states had mandatory statewide EMS protocols at either the basic life support (BLS) or advanced life support (ALS) level, and in 16 of these states, mandatory protocols covered both BLS and ALS levels of care. Seventeen states had model statewide protocols at either the BLS or ALS level, and in 14 of these states, the model protocols covered both BLS and ALS levels of care. Twenty states had separate protocols for the care of pediatric patients, while 18 states combined pediatric and adult care within the same protocols. When identified, the median age used to consider a patient for pediatric care was ≤14 years (range ≤8 to ≤17 years). Three states' protocols used a child's height based on a length-based dosage tool as the threshold for identifying a pediatric patient for care using their pediatric protocols. States varied in recognition of receiving centers for EMS patients with special medical needs: 46 recognized trauma centers, 25 recognized burn centers, 22 recognized stroke centers, 11 recognized centers capable of percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction, and 3 recognized centers for patients surviving cardiac arrest.

CONCLUSION

Statewide mandated EMS treatment protocols exist in 21 states, and optional model protocol guidelines are provided by 17 states. There is wide variation in the format and characteristics of these protocols and the recognition of specialty receiving centers for patients with time-sensitive illnesses.