1
|
Hermsen R. Emergent multilevel selection in a simple spatial model of the evolution of altruism. PLoS Comput Biol 2022; 18:e1010612. [PMID: 36282807 PMCID: PMC9595567 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Theories on the evolutionary origins of altruistic behavior have a long history and have become a canonical part of the theory of evolution. Nevertheless, the mechanisms that allow altruism to appear and persist are still incompletely understood. It is well known, however, that the spatial structure of populations is an important determinant. In both theoretical and experimental studies, much attention has been devoted to populations that are subdivided into discrete groups. Such studies typically imposed the structure and dynamics of the groups by hand. Here, we instead present a simple individual-based model in which altruistic organisms spontaneously self-organize into spatially separated colonies that themselves reproduce by binary fission and hence behave as Darwinian entities in their own right. Using software to automatically track the rise and fall of colonies, we are able to apply formal theory on multilevel selection and thus quantify the within- and among-group dynamics. This reveals that individual colonies inevitably succumb to defectors in a within-colony "tragedy of the commons". Even so, altruism persists in the population because more altruistic colonies reproduce more frequently and drive less altruistic ones to extinction. Evidently, the colonies promote the selection of altruism but in turn depend on altruism for their existence; the selection of altruism hence involves a kind of evolutionary bootstrapping. The emergence of the colonies also depends crucially on the length scales of motility, altruism, and competition. This reconfirms the general relevance of these scales for social evolution, but also stresses that their impact can only be understood fully in the light of the emergent eco-evolutionary spatial patterns. The results also suggest that emergent spatial population patterns can function as a starting point for transitions of individuality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rutger Hermsen
- Theoretical Biology Group, Biology Department, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands,Centre for Complex Systems Studies, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands,* E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
Many microorganisms with high prevalence in host populations are beneficial to the host and maintained by specialized transmission mechanisms. Although microbial promotion of host fitness and specificity of the associations undoubtedly enhance microbial prevalence, it is an open question whether these symbiotic traits are also a prerequisite for the evolutionary origin of prevalent microbial taxa. To address this issue, we investigate how processes without positive microbial effects on host fitness or host choice can influence the prevalence of certain microbes in a host population. Specifically, we develop a theoretical model to assess the conditions under which particular microbes can become enriched in animal hosts even when they are not providing a specific benefit to a particular host. We find increased prevalence of specific microbes in a host when both show some overlap in their lifecycles, and especially when both share dispersal routes across a patchy habitat distribution. Our results emphasize that host enrichment per se is not a reliable indicator of beneficial host-microbe interactions. The resulting increase in time spent associated with a host may nevertheless give rise to new selection conditions, which can favor microbial adaptations toward a host-associated lifestyle, and, thus, it could be the foundation for subsequent evolution of mutually beneficial coevolved symbioses.
Collapse
|
3
|
Sánchez Á, Vila JCC, Chang CY, Diaz-Colunga J, Estrela S, Rebolleda-Gomez M. Directed Evolution of Microbial Communities. Annu Rev Biophys 2021; 50:323-341. [PMID: 33646814 PMCID: PMC8105285 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-101220-072829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Directed evolution is a form of artificial selection that has been used for decades to find biomolecules and organisms with new or enhanced functional traits. Directed evolution can be conceptualized as a guided exploration of the genotype-phenotype map, where genetic variants with desirable phenotypes are first selected and then mutagenized to search the genotype space for an even better mutant. In recent years, the idea of applying artificial selection to microbial communities has gained momentum. In this article, we review the main limitations of artificial selection when applied to large and diverse collectives of asexually dividing microbes and discuss how the tools of directed evolution may be deployed to engineer communities from the top down. We conceptualize directed evolution of microbial communities as a guided exploration of an ecological structure-function landscape and propose practical guidelines for navigating these ecological landscapes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Álvaro Sánchez
- Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology and Microbial Sciences Institute, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA; , , , , ,
| | - Jean C C Vila
- Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology and Microbial Sciences Institute, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA; , , , , ,
| | - Chang-Yu Chang
- Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology and Microbial Sciences Institute, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA; , , , , ,
| | - Juan Diaz-Colunga
- Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology and Microbial Sciences Institute, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA; , , , , ,
| | - Sylvie Estrela
- Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology and Microbial Sciences Institute, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA; , , , , ,
| | - María Rebolleda-Gomez
- Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology and Microbial Sciences Institute, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA; , , , , ,
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chang CY, Osborne ML, Bajic D, Sanchez A. Artificially selecting bacterial communities using propagule strategies. Evolution 2020; 74:2392-2403. [PMID: 32888315 PMCID: PMC7942404 DOI: 10.1111/evo.14092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2020] [Revised: 08/21/2020] [Accepted: 08/29/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Artificial selection is a promising approach to manipulate microbial communities. Here, we report the outcome of two artificial selection experiments at the microbial community level. Both used "propagule" selection strategies, whereby the best-performing communities are used as the inocula to form a new generation of communities. Both experiments were contrasted to a random selection control. The first experiment used a defined set of strains as the starting inoculum, and the function under selection was the amylolytic activity of the consortia. The second experiment used multiple soil communities as the starting inocula, and the function under selection was the communities' cross-feeding potential. In both experiments, the selected communities reached a higher mean function than the control. In the first experiment, this was caused by a decline in function of the control, rather than an improvement of the selected line. In the second experiment, this response was fueled by the large initial variance in function across communities, and stopped when the top-performing community "fixed" in the metacommunity. Our results are in agreement with basic expectations from breeding theory, pointing to some of the limitations of community-level selection experiments that can inform the design of future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chang-Yu Chang
- Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.,Microbial Sciences Institute. Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Melisa L. Osborne
- The Rowland Institute at Harvard, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.,Graduate Program in Bioinformatics and Biological Design Center, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Djordje Bajic
- Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.,Microbial Sciences Institute. Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Alvaro Sanchez
- Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.,Microbial Sciences Institute. Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.,The Rowland Institute at Harvard, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.,Corresponding author:
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Koike S, Nakamaru M, Otaka T, Shimao H, Shimomura KI, Yamato T. Reciprocity and exclusion in informal financial institutions: An experimental study of rotating savings and credit associations. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0202878. [PMID: 30157222 PMCID: PMC6114866 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2017] [Accepted: 08/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Group cooperation is fundamental to human society. The public goods game is often used to describe the difficulty of group cooperation. However, there are other structures of institutions to maintain group cooperation such as Rotating savings and credit associations (ROSCAs). ROSCAs are informal financial institutions that exist worldwide, in which all participants contribute to a common fund and take turns to receive a return. ROSCAs are common in developing countries and among migrant groups in developed countries. There are various types of ROSCAs, and they share a crucial problem in that participants whose turn to receive a return has passed have an incentive to default on their contributions. We conducted a laboratory experiment to investigate the mechanisms that can prevent default in a fixed ROSCA, in which the order of receipt of returns is determined before starting and is also known to members. The findings are as follows. (i) Excluding low contributors from ROSCA groups by voting increased contribution rates both before and after the receipt of returns. (ii) ROSCA members exhibited reciprocity and a sense of revenge: that is, members contributed to the returns payments of other members who had contributed to them, and did not contribute to the returns payments of non-contributors. Voluntary behaviors thus sustained ROSCAs. Meanwhile, an exogenous punishment whereby subjects were prevented from receiving returns payments unless they had themselves contributed previously did not increase contribution rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shimpei Koike
- Department of Value and Decision Science, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mayuko Nakamaru
- Department of Value and Decision Science, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan
- School of Environment and Society, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tokinao Otaka
- Department of Social Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hajime Shimao
- Department of Value and Decision Science, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ken-Ichi Shimomura
- Research Institute for Economics and Business Administration, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
| | - Takehiko Yamato
- School of Environment and Society, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan
- School of Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Wade
- University of Chicago, Department of Biology, Chicago, Illinois, 60637
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Aoki K. A CONDITION FOR GROUP SELECTION TO PREVAIL OVER COUNTERACTING INDIVIDUAL SELECTION. Evolution 2017; 36:832-842. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1982.tb05449.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/1981] [Revised: 11/16/1981] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kenichi Aoki
- National Institute of Genetics; Mishima Shizuoka-ken 411 Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wade MJ. GROUP SELECTION: MIGRATION AND THE DIFFERENTIATION OF SMALL POPULATIONS. Evolution 2017; 36:949-961. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1982.tb05465.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/1980] [Revised: 12/28/1981] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J. Wade
- Department of Biology; University of Chicago; Chicago Illinois 60637
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Wade
- Department of Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, 60637
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Craig DM. GROUP SELECTION VERSUS INDIVIDUAL SELECTION: AN EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS. Evolution 2017; 36:271-282. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1982.tb05041.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/1980] [Revised: 07/29/1981] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- David M. Craig
- Department of Biological Sciences University of Illinois at Chicago Circle Box 4348 Chicago Illinois 60680
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Łomnicki A. Group selection for the self-regulation of population density. ADV APPL PROBAB 2016. [DOI: 10.2307/1426712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
|
12
|
|
13
|
Wilder B, Stanley KO. Altruists Proliferate Even at a Selective Disadvantage within Their Own Niche. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0128654. [PMID: 26030734 PMCID: PMC4451246 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2014] [Accepted: 04/29/2015] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The evolutionary origin of altruism is a long-standing puzzle. Numerous explanations have been proposed, most prominently based on inclusive fitness or group selection. One possibility that has not yet been considered is that new niches will be created disproportionately often when altruism appears, perhaps by chance, causing altruists to be over-represented in such new niches. This effect is a novel variant of group selection in which altruistic groups benefit by discovering unoccupied niches instead of by competing for the limited resources within a single niche. Both an analytical population genetics model and computational simulations support that altruism systematically arises due to this side effect of increased carrying capacity even when it is strongly selected against within any given niche. In fact, even when selection is very strongly negative and altruism does not develop in most populations, it can still be expected to be observed in a consistent fraction of species. The ecological structure provided by niches thereby may be sufficient for altruists to proliferate even if they are always at a disadvantage within each niche considered individually.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan Wilder
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Kenneth O. Stanley
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Nakamaru M, Yokoyama A. The effect of ostracism and optional participation on the evolution of cooperation in the voluntary public goods game. PLoS One 2014; 9:e108423. [PMID: 25255458 PMCID: PMC4177995 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2014] [Accepted: 08/27/2014] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Not only animals, plants and microbes but also humans cooperate in groups. The evolution of cooperation in a group is an evolutionary puzzle, because defectors always obtain a higher benefit than cooperators. When people participate in a group, they evaluate group member's reputations and then decide whether to participate in it. In some groups, membership is open to all who are willing to participate in the group. In other groups, a candidate is excluded from membership if group members regard the candidate's reputation as bad. We developed an evolutionary game model and investigated how participation in groups and ostracism influence the evolution of cooperation in groups when group members play the voluntary public goods game, by means of computer simulation. When group membership is open to all candidates and those candidates can decide whether to participate in a group, cooperation cannot be sustainable. However, cooperation is sustainable when a candidate cannot be a member unless all group members admit them to membership. Therefore, it is not participation in a group but rather ostracism, which functions as costless punishment on defectors, that is essential to sustain cooperation in the voluntary public goods game.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mayuko Nakamaru
- Tokyo Institute of Technology, O-okayama, Meguro, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akira Yokoyama
- Tokyo Institute of Technology, O-okayama, Meguro, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
The demographic benefits of belligerence and bravery: defeated group repopulation or victorious group size expansion? PLoS One 2011; 6:e21437. [PMID: 21750712 PMCID: PMC3130041 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2011] [Accepted: 05/27/2011] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Intraspecific coalitional aggression between groups of individuals is a widespread trait in the animal world. It occurs in invertebrates and vertebrates, and is prevalent in humans. What are the conditions under which coalitional aggression evolves in natural populations? In this article, I develop a mathematical model delineating conditions where natural selection can favor the coevolution of belligerence and bravery between small-scale societies. Belligerence increases an actor's group probability of trying to conquer another group and bravery increase the actors's group probability of defeating an attacked group. The model takes into account two different types of demographic scenarios that may lead to the coevolution of belligerence and bravery. Under the first, the fitness benefits driving the coevolution of belligerence and bravery come through the repopulation of defeated groups by fission of victorious ones. Under the second demographic scenario, the fitness benefits come through a temporary increase in the local carrying capacity of victorious groups, after transfer of resources from defeated groups to victorious ones. The analysis of the model suggests that the selective pressures on belligerence and bravery are stronger when defeated groups can be repopulated by victorious ones. The analysis also suggests that, depending on the shape of the contest success function, costly bravery can evolve in groups of any size.
Collapse
|
16
|
|
17
|
|
18
|
What is selected in group selection? Behav Brain Sci 2010. [DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x00044010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
AbstractMisunderstandings often develop when scientists from different backgrounds use the same words (e.g., “selection”) when they mean different things by them. Theorists must therefore choose and define their terms carefully. In addition, proponents of “new” theories need to demonstrate empirically that theirs are more powerful than the existing theories they wish to supplant. Wilson & Sober have not yet done this.
Collapse
|
19
|
|
20
|
|
21
|
Abstract
AbstractHumans appear to be possible candidates for group selection because they are often said to live in bands, clans, and tribes. These terms, however, are only names for conceptual categories of people. They do not designate enduring bounded gatherings of people that might be “vehicles of selection.” Hence, group selection has probably not been a major force in human evolution.
Collapse
|
22
|
Nongenetic and non-Darwinian evolution. Behav Brain Sci 2010. [DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x00036396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
23
|
|
24
|
|
25
|
Abstract
AbstractIn both biology and the human sciences, social groups are sometimes treated as adaptive units whose organization cannot be reduced to individual interactions. This group-level view is opposed by a more individualistic one that treats social organization as a byproduct of self-interest. According to biologists, group-level adaptations can evolve only by a process of natural selection at the group level. Most biologists rejected group selection as an important evolutionary force during the 1960s and 1970s but a positive literature began to grow during the 1970s and is rapidly expanding today. We review this recent literature and its implications for human evolutionary biology. We show that the rejection of group selection was based on a misplaced emphasis on genes as “replicators” which is in fact irrelevant to the question of whether groups can be like individuals in their functional organization. The fundamental question is whether social groups and other higher-level entities can be “vehicles” of selection. When this elementary fact is recognized, group selection emerges as an important force in nature and what seem to be competing theories, such as kin selection and reciprocity, reappear as special cases of group selection. The result is a unified theory of natural selection that operates on a nested hierarchy of units.The vehicle-based theory makes it clear that group selection is an important force to consider in human evolution. Humans can facultatively span the full range from self-interested individuals to “organs” of group-level “organisms.” Human behavior not only reflects the balance between levels of selection but it can also alter the balance through the construction of social structures that have the effect of reducing fitness differences within groups, concentrating natural selection (and functional organization) at the group level. These social structures and the cognitive abilities that produce them allow group selection to be important even among large groups of unrelated individuals.
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
AbstractMany neo-Darwinists treat natural selection of genes and individual organisms as broadly equivalent. This enables Wilson & Sober (W&S) to propose a multilevel group selection model by drawing parallels between individuals and groups. The notion of gene/individual equivalence is a profound misconception. Its elimination negates W&S's current approach but offers the best way forward for both life and behavioural sciences.
Collapse
|
27
|
The maintenance of behavioral diversity in human societies. Behav Brain Sci 2010. [DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x00036438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
28
|
Empirically equivalent theories. Behav Brain Sci 2010. [DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x0003630x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
29
|
Driving both ways: Wilson & Sober's conflicting criteria for the identification of groups as vehicles of selection. Behav Brain Sci 2010. [DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x00036116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
32
|
Abstract
AbstractThe six commentaries raise five issues about multi-level selection theory that we attempt to address: (1) replicators without vehicles, (2) group selection and movement between groups, (3) absolute versus relative fitness, (4) group-level psychological adaptions, and (5) multi-level selection as a predictive theory.
Collapse
|
33
|
|
34
|
|
35
|
|
36
|
|
37
|
|
38
|
|
39
|
|
40
|
|
41
|
|
42
|
Beyond shared fate: Group-selected mechanisms for cooperation and competition in fuzzy, fluid vehicles. Behav Brain Sci 2010. [DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x00036360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
43
|
|
44
|
Abstract
AbstractIf selection at the group level is to be considered more than a mere possibility, it is important to find phenomena that are best explained at this level of selection. I argue that human religious phenomena provide evidence for the selection of a “pious gene” at the group level, which results in a human tendency to believe in a transcendental reality that encourages behavioral conformity to collective as opposed to individual interest.
Collapse
|
45
|
Different vehicles for group selection in humans. Behav Brain Sci 2010. [DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x00036335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
46
|
Levin BR, Cornejo OE. The population and evolutionary dynamics of homologous gene recombination in bacterial populations. PLoS Genet 2009; 5:e1000601. [PMID: 19680442 PMCID: PMC2717328 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2009] [Accepted: 07/15/2009] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
In bacteria, recombination is a rare event, not a part of the reproductive process. Nevertheless, recombination—broadly defined to include the acquisition of genes from external sources, i.e., horizontal gene transfer (HGT)—plays a central role as a source of variation for adaptive evolution in many species of bacteria. Much of niche expansion, resistance to antibiotics and other environmental stresses, virulence, and other characteristics that make bacteria interesting and problematic, is achieved through the expression of genes and genetic elements obtained from other populations of bacteria of the same and different species, as well as from eukaryotes and archaea. While recombination of homologous genes among members of the same species has played a central role in the development of the genetics and molecular biology of bacteria, the contribution of homologous gene recombination (HGR) to bacterial evolution is not at all clear. Also, not so clear are the selective pressures responsible for the evolution and maintenance of transformation, the only bacteria-encoded form of HGR. Using a semi-stochastic simulation of mutation, recombination, and selection within bacterial populations and competition between populations, we explore (1) the contribution of HGR to the rate of adaptive evolution in these populations and (2) the conditions under which HGR will provide a bacterial population a selective advantage over non-recombining or more slowly recombining populations. The results of our simulation indicate that, under broad conditions: (1) HGR occurring at rates in the range anticipated for bacteria like Streptococcus pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Haemophilus influenzae, and Bacillus subtilis will accelerate the rate at which a population adapts to environmental conditions; (2) once established in a population, selection for this capacity to increase rates of adaptive evolution can maintain bacteria-encoded mechanisms of recombination and prevent invasion of non-recombining populations, even when recombination engenders a modest fitness cost; and (3) because of the density- and frequency-dependent nature of HGR in bacteria, this capacity to increase rates of adaptive evolution is not sufficient as a selective force to provide a recombining population a selective advantage when it is rare. Under realistic conditions, homologous gene recombination will increase the rate of adaptive evolution in bacterial populations and, once established, selection for higher rates of evolution will promote the maintenance of bacteria-encoded mechanisms for HGR. On the other hand, increasing rates of adaptive evolution by HGR is unlikely to be the sole or even a dominant selective pressure responsible for the original evolution of transformation. For many species of bacteria, recombination in the form of the acquisition and expression of genes and genetic elements acquired from other bacteria, eukaryotes, and archaea, HGT is an important source of variation for adaptive evolution. Not so clear is the contribution of recombination of homologous genes to adaptive evolution and as a selective pressure for the evolution and maintenance of HGT. Using computer simulations, we explore the role of HGR to adaptive evolution and selection for the evolution and maintenance of HGT. We demonstrate that under realistic conditions by shuffling genes within a bacterial population, HGR will increase its rate of adaptive evolution. Once established, this capacity to increase the rate of adaptive evolution can serve as a selective force for the maintenance of HGT. On the other hand, HGR cannot provide an advantage to a population when its density is low or when the recombining population is rare relative to non-recombining competitors. Thus, we postulate that it is unlikely that the only bacteria—rather than plasmid (or phage)—determined mechanism of HGR, transformation, evolved in response to selection for higher rates of evolution by gene shuffling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruce R Levin
- Department of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Episodic selection and the maintenance of competence and natural transformation in Bacillus subtilis. Genetics 2009; 181:1521-33. [PMID: 19189946 DOI: 10.1534/genetics.108.099523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
We present a new hypothesis for the selective pressures responsible for maintaining natural competence and transformation. Our hypothesis is based in part on the observation that in Bacillus subtilis, where transformation is widespread, competence is associated with periods of nongrowth in otherwise growing populations. As postulated for the phenomenon of persistence, the short-term fitness cost associated with the production of transiently nongrowing bacteria can be compensated for and the capacity to produce these competent cells can be favored due to episodes where the population encounters conditions that kill dividing bacteria. With the aid of a mathematical model, we demonstrate that under realistic conditions this "episodic selection" for transiently nongrowing (persisting) bacteria can maintain competence for the uptake and expression of exogenous DNA transformation. We also show that these conditions for maintaining competence are dramatically augmented even by rare episodes where selection favors transformants. Using experimental populations of B. subtilis and antibiotic-mediated episodic selection, we test and provide support for the validity of the assumptions behind this model and the predictions generated from our analysis of its properties. We discuss the potential generality of episodic selection for the maintenance of competence in other naturally transforming species of bacteria and critically evaluate other hypotheses for the maintenance (and evolution) of competence and their relationship to this hypothesis.
Collapse
|
48
|
Abstract
Pluralism is the coexistence of equivalent theoretical frameworks, either because they are historically entrenched or because they achieve separate insights by viewing the same process in different ways. A recent article by West et al. [Journal of Evolutionary Biology (2007) vol. 20, 415-432] attempts to classify the many equivalent frameworks that have been developed to study the evolution of social behaviour. This article addresses shortcomings in the West et al.'s article, especially with respect to multilevel selection, in a common effort to maximize the benefits of pluralism while minimizing the semantic costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D S Wilson
- Departments of Biology and Anthropology, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Traulsen A, Shoresh N, Nowak MA. Analytical results for individual and group selection of any intensity. Bull Math Biol 2008; 70:1410-24. [PMID: 18386099 PMCID: PMC2574888 DOI: 10.1007/s11538-008-9305-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2007] [Accepted: 01/25/2008] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
The idea of evolutionary game theory is to relate the payoff of a game to reproductive success (= fitness). An underlying assumption in most models is that fitness is a linear function of the payoff. For stochastic evolutionary dynamics in finite populations, this leads to analytical results in the limit of weak selection, where the game has a small effect on overall fitness. But this linear function makes the analysis of strong selection difficult. Here, we show that analytical results can be obtained for any intensity of selection, if fitness is defined as an exponential function of payoff. This approach also works for group selection (= multi-level selection). We discuss the difference between our approach and that of inclusive fitness theory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arne Traulsen
- Program for Evolutionary Dynamics, Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Department of Mathematics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Abstract
If someone is nice to you, you feel good and may be inclined to be nice to somebody else. This every day experience is borne out by experimental games: the recipients of an act of kindness are more likely to help in turn, even if the person who benefits from their generosity is somebody else. This behaviour, which has been called 'upstream reciprocity', appears to be a misdirected act of gratitude: you help somebody because somebody else has helped you. Does this make any sense from an evolutionary or a game theoretic perspective? In this paper, we show that upstream reciprocity alone does not lead to the evolution of cooperation, but it can evolve and increase the level of cooperation if it is linked to either direct or spatial reciprocity. We calculate the random walks of altruistic acts that are induced by upstream reciprocity. Our analysis shows that gratitude and other positive emotions, which increase the willingness to help others, can evolve in the competitive world of natural selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin A Nowak
- Program for Evolutionary Dynamics, Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|