Massively dilated esophagus in achalasia: response to pneumatic balloon dilation

Laparoscopic Heller-Dor is an effective long-term treatment for end-stage achalasia

BACKGROUND

The end-stage achalasia is a difficult condition to treat, for the esophageal diameter and conformation of the gullet, that may progress to a sigmoid shape. The aim of this study was to examine the outcome of Laparoscopic Heller-Dor in patients with end-stage achalasia, comparing them with patients who had mega-esophagus without a sigmoid shape.

METHODS

From 1992 to 2020, patients with a diagnosis of sigmoid esophagus, or radiological stage IV achalasia (the SE group), and patients with a straight esophagus larger than 6 cm in diameter, or radiological stage III achalasia (the NSE group), were all treated with LHD. The two groups were compared in terms of patients' symptoms, based on the Eckardt score, and on barium swallow, endoscopy and manometry performed before and after the treatment. The failure of the treatment was defined as an Eckardt score > 3, or the need for further treatment.

RESULTS

The study involved 164 patients: 73 in the SE group and 91 in the NSE group. No intra- or postoperative mortality was recorded. The median follow-up was 51 months (IQR 25-107). The outcome was satisfactory in 71.2% of patients in the SE group, and in 89% of those in the NSE group (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

SE is certainly the worst condition of the disease and the final outcome of LHD, in term of symptom control, is inferior compared to NSE. Despite this, almost 3/4 of the SE patients experienced a significant relieve in symptoms after LHD, which may therefore still be the first surgical option to offer to these patients, before considering esophagectomy.

A Case of Achalasia Presenting with Cardiac Arrest due to Left Atrial Compression

Achalasia is a rare primary esophageal motility disorder characterized by the loss of enteric neurons leading to an absence of peristalsis and impaired relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter. The subsequent stasis of ingested food not only leads to symptoms of dysphagia, regurgitation, chest pain, and weight loss, but also results in an increased risk of esophageal carcinoma. Structural or functional pulmonary abnormalities occur in more than half of patients and may be due to recurrent aspiration or tracheal compression from a dilated esophagus. Delayed diagnosis or ineffective intervention may lead to progressive dilation of the esophagus and the development of a megaesophagus. Respiratory distress and cardiopulmonary arrest from tracheal or left atrial compression secondary to a megaesophagus are rare complications of achalasia. There is only limited evidence that pneumatic dilation may be used as a first-line therapy for a megaesophagus. The choice of definitive treatment will depend on many factors including achalasia type, patient wishes, performance status, and surgical expertise.

The 2018 ISDE achalasia guidelines

Achalasia is a relatively rare primary motor esophageal disorder, characterized by absence of relaxations of the lower esophageal sphincter and of peristalsis along the esophageal body. As a result, patients typically present with dysphagia, regurgitation and occasionally chest pain, pulmonary complication and malnutrition. New diagnostic methodologies and therapeutic techniques have been recently added to the armamentarium for treating achalasia. With the aim to offer clinicians and patients an up-to-date framework for making informed decisions on the management of this disease, the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus Guidelines proposed and endorsed the Esophageal Achalasia Guidelines (I-GOAL). The guidelines were prepared according the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE-REX) tool, accredited for guideline production by NICE UK. A systematic literature search was performed and the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations were graded according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Given the relative rarity of this disease and the paucity of high-level evidence in the literature, this process was integrated with a three-step process of anonymous voting on each statement (DELPHI). Only statements with an approval rate >80% were accepted in the guidelines. Fifty-one experts from 11 countries and 3 representatives from patient support associations participated to the preparations of the guidelines. These guidelines deal specifically with the following achalasia issues: Diagnostic workup, Definition of the disease, Severity of presentation, Medical treatment, Botulinum Toxin injection, Pneumatic dilatation, POEM, Other endoscopic treatments, Laparoscopic myotomy, Definition of recurrence, Follow up and risk of cancer, Management of end stage achalasia, Treatment options for failure, Achalasia in children, Achalasia secondary to Chagas' disease.

Comparative observation on different intervention procedures in benign stricture of gastrointestinal tract

AIM: To determine the most effective intervention procedure by evaluation of mid and long-term therapeutic efficacy in patients of stricture of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT).

METHODS: Different intervention procedures were used to treat benign stricture of GIT in 180 patients including pneumatic dilation (group A, n = 80), permanent (group B, n = 25) and temporary (group C, n = 75) placement of expandable metallic stents.

RESULTS: The diameters of the strictured GIT were significantly greater after the treatment of all procedures employed (P < 0.01). For the 80 patients in group A, 160 dilations were performed (mean, 2.0 times per patient). Complications in group A included chest pain (n = 20), reflux (n = 16), and bleeding (n = 6). Dysphagia relapse occurred in 24 (30%) and 48 (60%) patients respectively during 6-and-12 momth follow-up periods in group A. In group B, 25 uncovered or partially covered or antireflux covered expandable metallic stents were placed permantly, complications included chest pain (n = 10), reflux (n = 15), bleeding (n = 3), and stent migration (n = 4), and dysphagia relapse occurred in 5 (20%) and 3 patients (25%) during the 6- and -12 month follow-up periods, respectively. In group C, the partially covered expandable metallic stents were temporarily placed in 75 patients and removed after 3 to 7 days via gastroscope, complications including chest pain (n = 30), reflux (n = 9), and bleeding (n = 12), and dysphagia relapse occurred in 9 (12%) and 8 patients (16%) during the 6-and-12 month follow-up periods, respectively. The placement and withdrawal of stents were all successfully performed. The follow-up of all patients lasted for 6 to 96 months (mean 45.3 ± 18.6 months).

CONCLUSION: The effective procedures for benign GIT stricture are pneumatic dilation and temporary placement of partially-covered expandable metallic stents. Temporary placement of partially-covered expandable metallic stents is one of the best methods for benign GIT strictures in mid and long-term therapeutic efficacy.

Selection and evaluation of three interventional procedures for achalasia based on long-term follow-up

AIM: To determine the best method out of the three types of interventional procedure for achalasia based on a long-term follow-up.

METHODS: The study cohort was comprised of 133 patients of achalasia. Among them, 60 patients were treated under fluoroscopy with pneumatic dilation (group A), 8 patients with permanent uncovered or antireflux covered metal stent dilation (group B), and 65 patients with temporary partially covered metal stent dilation (group C).

RESULTS: One hundred and thirty dilations were performed on the 60 patients of group A (mean 2.2 times per case). The mean diameter of the strictured cardia was 3.3 ± 2.1 mm before dilation and 10.6 ± 3.8 mm after dilation. The mean dysphagia score was 2.7 ± 1.4 before dilation and 0.9 ± 0.3 after dilation. Complications in group A were chest pain (n = 30), reflux (n = 16), and bleeding (n = 6). Thirty-six patients (60%) in group A exhibited dysphagia relapse during a 12-month follow-up, and 45 patients (90%) out of 50 exhibited dysphagia relapse during a 36-month follow-up. Five uncovered and 3 antireflux covered expandable metal stents were permanently placed in the 8 patients of group B. The mean diameter of the strictured cardia was 3.4 ± 1.9 mm before dilation and 19.5 ± 1.1 mm after dilation. The mean dysphagia score was 2.6 ± 1.3 before dilation and 0.4 ± 0.1 after dilation. Complications in group B were chest pain (n = 6), reflux (n = 5), bleeding (n = 3), and hyperplasia of granulation tissue (n = 3). Four patients (50%) in group B exhibited dysphagia relapse during a 12-month follow-up, and 2 case (66.7%) out of 3 patients exhibited dysphagia relapse during a 36-month follow-up. Sixty-five partially covered expandable metal stents were temporarily placed in the 65 patients of group C and withdrawn after 3-7 d via gastroscopy. The mean diameter of the strictured cardia was 3.3 ± 2.3 mm before dilation and 18.9 ± 3.5 mm after dilation. The mean dysphagia score was 2.4 ± 1.3 before dilation and 0.5 ± 0.2 after dilation. Complications in group C were chest pain (n = 26), reflux (n = 13), and bleeding (n = 8). 6 patients (9.2%) out of 65 exhibited dysphagia relapse during a 12-month follow-up, and 8 patients (14.5%) out of 55 exhibited dysphagia relapse during a 36-month follow-up. All the stents were inserted and withdrawn successfully. The follow-up in groups A-C lasted 12-96 months.

CONCLUSION: Temporary partially covered metal stent dilation is one of the best methods with interventional procedure for achalasia in terms of long-term follow-up.

Long-term follow-up of achalasia patients treated with botulinum toxin

AIMS

To evaluate long-term efficacy of intrasphincteric injection of botulinum toxin in untreated achalasia patients; to analyse whether age can be a predictor of response; and to verify whether any objective measurements correlate with symptom relief

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 37 patients (mean age 61.4+/-17.5 years) were enrolled, all of whom injected endoscopically with 100 U of botulinum toxin. Symptom score, oesophageal manometry and oesophageal radionuclide emptying were assessed prior to treatment and 4 weeks, 3 months and 1 year after botulinum toxin. In the case of failure or relapse (symptom score >2), treatment was repeated.

RESULTS

All but 6 patients (83.7%) were in clinical remission one month after botulinum toxin. At 12 months, mean symptom score was 0.9+/-0.5 (p<0.05 vs basal); mean lower oesophageal sphincter pressure was 22.0+/-6.3 (p<0.05 vs basal), and 10-min radionuclide retention was 14.0%+/-7.2 (p<0.05 vs basal). Of the 35 patients followed, 12 (34.3%) had a relapse and were re-treated; 4 out of 12 did not respond after re-treatment. Efficacy of first injection of botulinum toxin lasted for a mean period of 15.6 months (range 2-30). Up to day 31 (83.7%) patients were still in remission. We observed a trend towards a better response to botulinum toxin treatment in patients over 50 years (p=0.053). Moreover no correlation was found between any objective achalasia measurements and symptom relief (r coefficient between 0.1 and 0.5)

CONCLUSIONS

Results show that: 1) one or two intrasphincteric injections of botulinum toxin result in clinical and objective improvement in about 84% of achalasia patients and are not associated with serious side-effects; 2) patients over 50 years showed better benefit than younger patients; 3) no correlation was found between any objective measurements and symptom relief.

Esophageal motor disorders

Motor dysfunction is responsible for symptomatic illnesses both in the proximal skeletal muscle region and in the distal smooth muscle esophagus. Practical methods for diagnosing and treating oropharyngeal dysphagia continue to reach consensus. Achalasia, the most significant of the distal motor disorders, is of investigative interest because of the expanded armamentarium of treatment options. Minimally invasive surgical methods have taken an important foothold as a primary treatment of this disorder. Appreciation is growing for sensory dysfunction that accompanies distal motor disorders. Such dysfunction may help explain the observed discrepancies between symptoms and measurable motility abnormality.