Multiple esophageal rings: an association with eosinophilic esophagitis: case report and review of the literature

Eosinophilic esophagitis: historical perspective on an evolving disease

Initial case series describing children and adults with symptoms related to esophageal dysfunction and dense esophageal eosinophilia lead to recognition of a "new" disease, eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Clinical, basic, and translational studies have provided a deeper understanding of this somewhat enigmatic disease that mechanistically is defined as an antigen-driven condition limited to the esophagus. This article summarizes many of the key historical features of EoE and provides a glimpse of potential future developments.

The link between allergies and eosinophilic esophagitis: implications for management strategies

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) has an increased incidence of diagnosis similar to other atopic diseases. We present a recent literature review of the common features between atopic diseases (i.e., asthma, allergic rhinitis and atopic dermatitis) and EE. All of the disorders have allergen triggers and evidence of a possible Th2 inflammation at the site of disease. Murine models have also shown similar features with the importance of T cells and Th2 cytokines for the development of disease. The diseases share underlying inflammation with the potential for remodeling with an increase in TGF-beta expression in asthma and EE. However, differences do exist between the diseases in treatment and pathogenesis. For EE, there are two basic treatment options: avoidance of the food triggers or treatment of the eosinophilic inflammation with corticosteroids.

Esophageal trachealization: a feature of eosinophilic esophagitis

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) is an inflammatory condition characterized by intense eosinophilic infiltration of the esophagus. EE is frequently misdiagnosed as gastroesophageal reflux disease. Here, we present a child with EE and a characteristic endoscopic finding, "ringed esophagus". An 11-year-old Saudi boy presented with dysphagia for 1 year. He had experienced an intermittent sensation of solid food sticking in his chest, which was relieved by drinking liquids. A barium swallow excluded anatomical causes of dysphagia, but revealed multiple-ringed esophagus. Endoscopy showed a furrowing and trachealizing appearance of the entire esophagus. Hisologically, extensive eosinophilic infiltration was a feature in biopsies obtained from the esophagus. The child responded well to a 2-month course of inhaled fluticasone. Symptoms recurred 3 months after discontinuation of therapy, which necessitated resumption of inhaled fluticasone. The endoscopic appearance of multiple esophageal rings should raise suspicion of EE and be confirmed by esophageal biopsies.

Periostin facilitates eosinophil tissue infiltration in allergic lung and esophageal responses

Periostin is an extracellular matrix protein that has been primarily studied in the context of the heart, where it has been shown to promote cardiac repair and remodeling. In this study, we focused on the role of periostin in an allergic eosinophilic inflammatory disease (eosinophilic esophagitis (EE)) known to involve extensive tissue remodeling. Periostin was indeed markedly overexpressed (35-fold) in the esophagus of EE patients, particularly in the papillae, compared with control individuals. Periostin expression was downstream from transforming growth factor-beta and interleukin-13, as these cytokines were elevated in EE esophageal samples and markedly induced periostin production by primary esophageal fibroblasts (107- and 295-fold, respectively, at 10 ng ml(-1)). A functional role for periostin in eliciting esophageal eosinophilia was demonstrated, as periostin-null mice had a specific defect in allergen-induced eosinophil recruitment to the lungs and esophagus (66 and 72% decrease, respectively). Mechanistic analyses revealed that periostin increased (5.8-fold) eosinophil adhesion to fibronectin. As such, these findings extend the involvement of periostin to esophagitis and uncover a novel role for periostin in directly regulating leukocyte (eosinophil) accumulation in T helper type 2-associated mucosal inflammation in both mice and humans.

Variability in diagnostic criteria for eosinophilic esophagitis: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an emerging clinicopathologic entity defined by abnormal esophageal eosinophilic infiltration. Our understanding of this disease is hampered by the lack of a uniform diagnostic standard. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the range of diagnostic strategies and histologic criteria in the EoE literature.

METHODS

The MEDLINE-indexed literature from 1950 through December 31, 2006 was independently searched by two investigators. To identify additional relevant studies, bibliographies were hand searched, as were the published proceedings of the 2000-2006 American College of Gastroenterology and American Gastroenterological Association national meetings. Data were extracted from all human EoE case reports, case series, cross-sectional and cohort studies, and clinical trials.

RESULTS

Of 318 publications initially identified, 116 original articles, 39 abstracts, and 69 reviews were included. We found 10 different histologic definitions of EoE, ranging from 5 to 30 eosinophils per high-powered field (hpf), though 41 (35%) of the original articles did not state their diagnostic criteria. In the 13 original articles (11%) reporting an hpf area, the eosinophil density per mm(2) varied 23-fold. There was also variation in esophageal biopsy protocols, but specific protocols were reported in just 45 (39%) original articles.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant variability in diagnostic criteria for eosinophilic esophagitis exists, and in a large proportion of studies, criteria are not reported. Because of this lack of a common disease definition, conclusions drawn from the cumulative EoE literature should be viewed with caution. A consensus research-quality standard for diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis is needed.

Intermittent dysphagia for solids associated with a multiringed esophagus: clinical features and response to dilatation

The entity of the multiringed esophagus, generally presenting in adults as intermittent dysphagia for solids, is relatively uncommon and its pathogenesis is unknown. The goal of this study was to describe the demographic, clinical, and endoscopic features of patients presenting with this condition, their response to esophageal dilatation, and the relationship of multiple esophageal rings to eosinophilic esophagitis. Between 1989 and June 2004, 32 patients at this adult hospital fulfilled the following inclusion criteria: (1) intermittent dysphagia for solids, (2) multiple esophageal rings at endoscopy, and (3) esophageal dilatation(s) performed. Response to esophageal dilatation was measured by need for subsequent dilatations. Seventy-five percent of the patients were male. Median age at onset of dysphagia was 21 years and at presentation 36.5 years. All had multiple rings in the proximal or midesophagus on endoscopy and had undergone a total of 73 esophageal dilatations with no esophageal perforations. Median maximal dilator size was 15 mm; however, 16% developed significant esophageal mucosal tears even with 11-mm dilators. Sixty-six percent required repeat dilatation, with the median time interval before recurrence being 8 months. Eosinophilic esophagitis (mucosal eosinophil count > 20/HPF) was present in 50% of this cohort. From this study we conclude that a multiringed esophagus causing intermittent dysphagia occurs predominantly in young males, responds well to dilatation, but repeated dilatations are often necessary. Dilatation can lead to extensive mucosal tears and should be performed with caution. Eosinophilic esophagitis is commonly but not invariably associated with this entity. Frequent relapse of dysphagia highlights the need for effective pharmacotherapy.

Idiopathic eosinophilic esophagitis in adults: the ringed esophagus

PURPOSE

To retrospectively assess the findings of idiopathic eosinophilic esophagitis (IEE) at barium studies and determine the frequency of the ringed esophagus in patients with this condition.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The institutional review board approved all aspects of this retrospective study and did not require informed consent from patients whose records were included in the study. The study was compliant with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. A review of the pathology and radiology databases at the authors' institution revealed 14 patients (11 men and three women; mean age, 41.3 years) with IEE (defined as more than 20 eosinophils per high-power field in biopsy specimens) who had undergone barium studies and endoscopy. The radiographs were reviewed for strictures, esophagitis, or other abnormalities. The endoscopic reports, clinical records, and laboratory data were also reviewed and compared with the radiographic findings.

RESULTS

Seven of the 14 patients (50%) had a history of allergies, and two of nine patients with complete blood cell counts (22%) had peripheral eosinophilia. Thirteen patients (93%) had dysphagia, six (43%) had food impactions, and six (43%) had reflux symptoms. Ten patients (71%) had a total of 11 strictures at barium studies (two in the upper part of the esophagus, two in the middle part, three in the distal part, one in the middle and distal parts, and three at the gastroesophageal junction). The strictures had a mean length of 5.1 cm. In seven patients (50%), the strictures contained multiple fixed ringlike indentations that produced a ringed esophagus. The ringlike indentations appeared as multiple, fixed, closely spaced, concentric rings traversing the stricture. Four patients (28%) had esophagitis. Of 13 patients who underwent recumbent imaging, 10 (77%) had hiatal hernias and nine (69%) had reflux. Eight of the 10 patients (80%) with strictures underwent endoscopic dilation procedures, which resulted in only temporary relief of dysphagia.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that most patients with IEE have esophageal strictures, often with distinctive ringlike indentations that produce a ringed esophagus.

Defiant dysphagia: small-caliber esophagus and refractory benign esophageal strictures

Among causes of defiant dysphagia, two pose a special challenge for the clinician: the small-caliber esophagus and refractory benign esophageal strictures. The small-caliber esophagus is a major cause of dysphagia for solids in young patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. A smooth, diffusely narrow esophageal lumen can be appreciated by barium esophagography or esophagoscopy. The term "small-caliber esophagus" is preferred over "stricture" because of the absence of cicatrization. A "subtle" small-caliber esophagus may defy detection by barium esophagogram and esophagogastroduodenoscopy. The only evidence to its diagnosis is the endoscopic finding of unusually long rents in the body of the esophagus immediately after esophageal dilation. The ringed esophagus seems to be a variant of the small-caliber esophagus, with the additional endoscopic finding of a variable number of rings (few to numerous) throughout the narrowed esophagus. Classification, diagnosis, and management of small-caliber esophagus are discussed in this review. Refractory esophageal strictures have various causes, including gastroesophageal reflux disease, nasogastric tube placement, mediastinal irradiation, and corrosive ingestion. Treatments used to eliminate or reduce the need for frequent esophageal bougienage include acid-suppressive medical therapy, surgery, intralesional corticosteroid injection, and esophageal self-expandable metal stents.

Eosinophilic Gastroenteritis

There are no evidence-based studies of the treatment of patients with eosinophilic gastroenteritis. Treatment decisions depend on experience gained from observations linking causative entities, principal clinical manifestations, and anticipated natural history of the disease. Because clinical symptoms and organ involvement probably vary with etiology, classification as to the likely cause (eg, food allergy or other dietary intolerance, idiosyncratic drug reaction, occult infection, idiopathic) determines the decisions made about dietary, pharmacologic, and surgical treatment. Elimination of foods and the use of elemental diets, corticosteroids, and mast cell inhibitors (eg, cromolyn sodium, ketotifen), alone or in combination, all have their place, depending on the age of the patient, organ involved, clinical presentation, and clinical urgency. Isolated cases are diagnosed only at surgical exploration for acute abdominal catastrophes; in these instances, further therapy depends on whether resection is done, but most patients remain in remission after surgery. Occult parasitism remains an elusive and unrecognized cause of an unknown number of cases, suggesting that empiric antihelminthic therapy should be tried in some patients. Individual reports of success with nonsystemic steroids and leukotriene inhibitors have been published.

Eosinophilic esophagitis: an emerging clinicopathologic entity

Eosinophilic esophagitis is a clinicopathologic disease characterized by 1) persistent upper intestinal symptoms despite the patient's use of gastric acid blockade and 2) large numbers of eosinophils in the squamous epithelium of the esophagus. This disease is increasing in frequency and the exact etiologic agent(s) remain elusive. The major importance of identifying eosinophilic esophagitis is that affected patients are receiving fundoplication for persistent symptoms when, in fact, corticosteroids or diet restriction is the treatment of choice.