Long-term rivastigmine treatment in a routine clinical setting

Does Certainty of Genuine Treatment Increase the Drug Response in Alzheimer's Disease Patients: A Meta-Analysis and Critical Discussion

BACKGROUND

Non-specific treatment effects, such as expectations, contribute to the effectiveness of pharmacological treatments across diseases. However, the contribution of expectancy, i.e., certainty of receiving treatment, in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The aim is to investigate whether certainty of receiving a genuine treatment influences the response to active treatment in AD patients.

METHODS

The efficacy of active treatments in open-label trials, where patients are certain of receiving treatment (100%certainty), was compared to the same active treatments in randomized controlled trials (RCT), where patients are uncertain of receiving treatment or placebo (50%certainty).

RESULTS

In the seven open-label trials, there was no significant difference between post- and pre-treatment scores (difference in means = 0.14, 95%CI [-0.51; 0.81], p = 0.66). In the eight RCT trials, there was a significant difference between post- and pre-treatment (difference in means = -0.91, 95%CI [-1.43; -0.41], p < 0.001). There was a statistically significant difference between open-label and RCT trials (difference = 1.06, 95%CI [0.23; 1.90], p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients with AD did not benefit from certainty of receiving genuine treatment. This could be due to the nature/progression of the disease, but it could also be related to an order effect in the practice of running AD trials, where RCTs are conducted prior to open label. These findings have implications for the understanding of non-specific treatment effects in AD patients as well as for the design of clinical trials that test pharmacological treatments in AD.

Effectiveness of the 10 cm2 Rivastigmine Patch in Taiwanese Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Alzheimer's Dementia: A 48-Week Real-World Observational Study

Introduction

The current study aimed to provide data on the effectiveness of the 10 cm² rivastigmine patch in patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in a real-world setting in Taiwan.

Methods

This was a 48-week, single-arm, open-label, observational, and post-marketing study conducted across seven centers in Taiwan between May 5, 2016 and July 10, 2017. Eligible patients (aged 55–95 years) treated with the 10 cm²rivastigmine patch were enrolled based on physicians’ judgment and according to the Taiwan reimbursement criteria of the drug. Data were prospectively collected at Week 0 (baseline), Week 24, and Week 48. The primary endpoint was the change in the cognitive assessment screening instrument (CASI) scores at Week 48 versus baseline. The changes from baseline in clinical dementia rating (CDR), mini-mental state examination (MMSE), and neuropsychiatric inventory (NPI) scores were evaluated, as were treatment persistence and the safety profile.

Results

Of the 285 eligible patients [full analysis set (FAS)], 216 (75.8%) completed the study protocol while 180 (63.2%) persisted on the 10 cm² rivastigmine patch for the full 48 weeks. At baseline, 89.8% of patients had a CDR score of 0.5 or 1, while the change in CDR score at Week 48 was not significant. In the FAS, both the CASI and MMSE scores had numerical improvement at Week 24 but declined by 2.1 and 0.4 points, respectively, at Week 48 (p = 0.005 and p = 0.022). The increment in NPI scores was not significant. The most common drug-related adverse events (AEs) were pruritus (11.2%), nausea (3.5%), rash (3.2%), and vomiting (2.8%).

Conclusions

The use of the 10 cm² rivastigmine patch in the mild stage of AD maintained cognitive function at Week 24 and neuropsychiatric function at Week 48. The treatment persistency and safety profile support the clinical tolerability of the rivastigmine patch in the management of mild-to-moderate AD in Taiwan.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-021-01893-6.

Sixteen-Week Interventional Study to Evaluate the Clinical Effects and Safety of Rivastigmine Capsules in Chinese Patients with Alzheimer's Disease

BACKGROUND

Rivastigmine is a cholinesterase inhibitor, approved for the treatment of mild-to-moderate dementia of Alzheimer's type.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the efficacy and safety of the maximal tolerated dose of rivastigmine capsules in Chinese patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD).

METHODS

The study was a multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase IV clinical study in mild-to-moderate drug-naïve AD patients treated with rivastigmine capsules. The primary endpoint was the changes in the total scores of Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) from baseline to week 16. Secondary endpoints included changes in the scores of the following assessment scales and safety: Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study; Activities of Daily Living; Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE); Neuropsychiatry Index (NPI), and Caregiver Burden Inventory.

RESULTS

222 patients were enrolled. Of these, 136 (75.1%) patients received and maintained the effective dose (≥6 mg/d) of rivastigmine for at least 4 weeks. The ADAS-Cog scale score improved in rivastigmine-treated patients at week 16 compared with baseline (p < 0.001) by 2.0 (95% CI: -3.0 to -1.1) points, which met the pre-defined superiority criteria. NPI-10 and NPI-12 scores improved by 3.6 and 4.0 points at week 16 (p = 0.001, p < 0.001), respectively. A total of 107 patients (59.1%) experienced adverse effects (AEs) during the study; common AEs included nausea (20.5%), vomiting (16.6%), anorexia (7.8%), dizziness (7.7%), and diarrhea (7.2%).

CONCLUSION

This was the first phase IV study on rivastigmine in mainland China. The study preliminarily demonstrated that rivastigmine capsules showed good tolerability and efficacy in mild-to-moderate AD patients with the maximal tolerated dose.

Future avenues for Alzheimer's disease detection and therapy: liquid biopsy, intracellular signaling modulation, systems pharmacology drug discovery

When Alzheimer's disease (AD) disease-modifying therapies will be available, global healthcare systems will be challenged by a large-scale demand for clinical and biological screening. Validation and qualification of globally accessible, minimally-invasive, and time-, cost-saving blood-based biomarkers need to be advanced. Novel pathophysiological mechanisms (and related candidate biomarkers) - including neuroinflammation pathways (TREM2 and YKL-40), axonal degeneration (neurofilament light chain protein), synaptic dysfunction (neurogranin, synaptotagmin, α-synuclein, and SNAP-25) - may be integrated into an expanding pathophysiological and biomarker matrix and, ultimately, integrated into a comprehensive blood-based liquid biopsy, aligned with the evolving ATN + classification system and the precision medicine paradigm. Liquid biopsy-based diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms are increasingly employed in Oncology disease-modifying therapies and medical practice, showing an enormous potential for AD and other brain diseases as well. For AD and other neurodegenerative diseases, newly identified aberrant molecular pathways have been identified as suitable therapeutic targets and are currently investigated by academia/industry-led R&D programs, including the nerve-growth factor pathway in basal forebrain cholinergic neurons, the sigma1 receptor, and the GTPases of the Rho family. Evidence for a clinical long-term effect on cognitive function and brain health span of cholinergic compounds, drug candidates for repositioning programs, and non-pharmacological multidomain interventions (nutrition, cognitive training, and physical activity) is developing as well. Ultimately, novel pharmacological paradigms, such as quantitative systems pharmacology-based integrative/explorative approaches, are gaining momentum to optimize drug discovery and accomplish effective pathway-based strategies for precision medicine. This article is part of the special issue on 'The Quest for Disease-Modifying Therapies for Neurodegenerative Disorders'.

Panax ginseng components and the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (Review)

Ginseng is one of the main representatives of traditional Chinese medicine and presents a wide range of pharmacological actions. Ginsenosides are the main class of active compounds found in ginseng. They demonstrate unique biological activity and medicinal value, namely anti-tumour, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties, as well as anti-apoptotic properties. Increasing levels of stress in life are responsible for the increased incidence of nervous system diseases. Neurological diseases create a huge burden on the lives and health of individuals. In recent years, studies have indicated that ginsenosides play a pronounced positive role in the prevention and treatment of neurological diseases. Nevertheless, research is still at an early stage of development, and the complex mechanisms of action involved remain largely unknown. This review aimed to shed light into what is currently known about the mechanisms of action of ginsenosides in relation to Alzheimer's disease. Scientific material and theoretical bases for the treatment of nervous system diseases with purified Panax ginseng extracts are also discussed.

Long-Term Response to Cholinesterase Inhibitor Treatment Is Related to Functional MRI Response in Alzheimer's Disease

BACKGROUND

Treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD) with cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEI) enhances cholinergic activity and alleviates clinical symptoms. However, there is variation in the clinical response as well as system level changes revealed by functional MRI (fMRI) studies.

METHODS

We investigated 18 newly diagnosed mild AD patients with fMRI using a face recognition task after a single oral dose of rivastigmine, a single dose of placebo and 1-month treatment with rivastigmine. The clinical follow-up took place at 6 and 12 months.

RESULTS

MMSE score difference between baseline and the follow-ups showed a positive correlation with fMRI activation difference between treatment and placebo in the right prefrontal cortex. A negative correlation was found for the left prefrontal cortex and the left fusiform gyrus. In addition, greater signal intensity in the right versus the left fusiform gyrus predicted a response to ChEI with increasing MMSE scores during the follow-up with 77.8% sensitivity and 77.8% specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

The increased fMRI activation by cholinergic stimulation in brain areas associated with the processing of the visual task reveals still functioning brain networks and a subsequent positive effect of ChEI on cognition. Thus, fMRI may be useful for identifying AD patients most likely to respond to treatment with ChEI.

Retrospective cohort study of the efficacy of caprylic triglyceride in patients with mild-to-moderate alzheimer's disease

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of caprylic triglyceride (CT) in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) in routine clinical practice via review of medical records and caregiver questionnaires.

METHODS

Participants were outpatients aged ≥50 years with a diagnosis of probable mild-to-moderate AD who had received CT for ≥6 months. The primary outcome was change from baseline in the patient's condition as rated by the treating physician using a physician's overall assessment.

RESULTS

A total of 55 patients were included. The physician's overall assessment indicated that ~80% of patients who had CT added to ongoing pharmacotherapy were stable or improved. Mini-Mental State Examination scores also remained stable over 15 months of therapy (20.6 ± 3.0 at baseline and 20.1 ± 5.6 at follow-up, P = 0.5233, n = 27). Caregiver assessments indicated that most patients were stable or improved with respect to memory and ability to carry out activities of daily living. The most frequent adverse events with CT involved the gastrointestinal system.

CONCLUSION

Results from this chart review indicate that addition of CT to pharmacotherapy was associated with stable disease or improvement over a follow-up period of 18.8 months.

Real-life effectiveness and tolerability of the rivastigmine transdermal patch in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease: the EMBRACE study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the real-life effectiveness and tolerability of the rivastigmine transdermal patch in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) in Canada.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Eighteen-month observational, prospective, multi-center, open-label study conducted on AD patients with Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination (SMMSE) score of 10-26 and Global Deterioration Scale (GDS) score of 4-6. Patients were treated with the rivastigmine transdermal patch (Exelon patch*) 5 cm² (4.6 mg/24 hours) or 10 cm² (9.5 mg/24 hours), once daily.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome was change in SMMSE from baseline to 18 months. Secondary outcomes included change in SMMSE at 6 and 12 months and change in GDS, Assessment of Patient Ability (APA-C), Overall Patient Assessment Rating (OPAR), caregiver-reported compliance and treatment satisfaction at 6, 12, and 18 months.

RESULTS

Among the 1204 patients enrolled, 969 were included in the ITT analysis. Mean (SD) age was 80.2 (8.00) years, disease duration was 0.6 (1.26) years, 62.0% of patients were women, 80.4% were living in the community, and 69.3% were treatment naïve. Mean (SD) baseline SMMSE and GDS scores were 21.8 (3.98) and 4.2 (0.61), respectively. Over 18 months of treatment there were no clinically significant changes in SMMSE and GDS. The majority of patients showed improvement or no change in GDS, APA-C and OPAR over 18 months. The proportion with reported improvement in GDS, APA-C and OPAR was higher than the proportion that deteriorated. Compliance improved from baseline to 18 months and for 88.2% of patients caregivers preferred the transdermal patch to oral medications.

CONCLUSIONS

The rivastigmine transdermal patch is effective in maintaining cognitive function over 18 months of treatment in patients with mild-to-moderate AD. The safety profile was comparable to the data in the Canadian product monograph. Lack of a comparator group is a potential limitation of the study.

Improvement of cognitive deficit in Alzheimer's disease patients by long term treatment with korean red ginseng

A 24-week randomized open-label study with Korean red ginseng (KRG) showed cognitive benefits in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. To further determine long-term effect of KRG, the subjects were recruited to be followed up to 2 yr. Cognitive function was evaluated every 12 wk using the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS) and the Korean version of the Mini Mental Status Examination (K-MMSE) with the maintaining dose of 4.5 g or 9.0 g KRG per d. At 24 wk, there had been a significant improvement in KRG-treated groups. In the long-term evaluation of the efficacy of KRG after 24 wk, the improved MMSE score remained without significant decline at the 48th and 96th wk. ADAS-cog showed similar findings. Maximum improvement was found around week 24. In conclusion, the effect of KRG on cognitive functions was sustained for 2 yr follow-up, indicating feasible efficacies of long-term follow-up for Alzheimer’s disease.

Cognitive Enhancers in Moderate to Severe Alzheimer's Disease

The treatment of moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease is reviewed with regard to mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, metabolism, safety/tolerability, and efficacy in reducing cognitive, behavioral/psychiatric, functional and global symptoms. The cholinesterase inhibitors donepezil, rivastigmine and galantamine and the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor channel blocker memantine are moderately beneficial. Small improvements over a few months are followed by slowed mental decline. Concerning cognitive, functional and global functions, these drugs are similarly effective. Cholinesterase inhibitors also reduce apathy, memantine counteracts agitation and aggression. Serious adverse effects are rare with all four drugs. Cholinesterase inhibitors bear a risk for patients with cardiac diseases. Adverse emetic events are typical for oral formulations of these drugs, but less for rivastigmine transdermal patches. Other routes of administration and use of a galantamine prodrug are currently investigated. The superiority of combination therapies over monotherapies requires further support. Promising investigational drugs include the copper/zinc ionophore PBT2 and multifunctional hybrid molecules.

Galantamine treatment in Alzheimer's disease: response and long-term outcome in a routine clinical setting

BACKGROUND

In the absence of long-term, placebo-controlled studies of cholinesterase inhibitors in Alzheimer's disease (AD), analysis of the results of open-label trials becomes crucial. This study aimed to explore the three-year effects of galantamine treatment, as well as subgroups of response and adherence to treatment.

METHODS

Two hundred and eighty patients with a clinical diagnosis of AD were included in the prospective, open-label, multicenter Swedish Alzheimer Treatment Study, and received galantamine treatment. Efficacy measures included cognitive tests, ie, the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog), functional rating (Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale [IADL]), and global rating. Assessments were carried out before treatment and every six months for a period of three years. K-means cluster analysis was used to identify response subgroups.

RESULTS

After three years of treatment, the mean change from baseline was 2.6 points in MMSE and 5.6 points in ADAS-cog scores. Globally, half of the patients improved or remained unchanged for two years. Cluster analysis identified two response clusters. Cluster 1 included patients with low ability in ADAS-cog and IADL scores at baseline. Even though the patients in cluster 1 were older and less educated, they responded better at six months compared with patients in cluster 2. Cluster 2 included patients with better ADAS-cog and IADL scores at baseline. Patients in cluster 2 had a higher frequency of the APOE ɛ4 allele, a slower pretreatment progression rate, and remained in the study longer than those in cluster 1. Three-year completers (n = 129, 46%) received higher doses of galantamine compared with dropouts.

CONCLUSION

AD patients who received long-term galantamine treatment were cognitively and globally stabilized. Subgroup response analysis identified a better short-term response in older patients with lower cognitive and functional abilities at baseline, a faster pretreatment progression rate, and a lower incidence of the APOE ɛ4 allele. The galantamine dose was higher in the population of completers.

Safety and tolerability of rivastigmine transdermal patch compared with rivastigmine capsules in patients switched from donepezil: data from three clinical trials

OBJECTIVES

To compare the safety and tolerability of switching patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease from donepezil to either rivastigmine capsule or transdermal patch.

METHODS

Three studies investigated the switch from donepezil to rivastigmine; study US13 was a 26-week, single-arm, immediate-switch study; US18 was a 26-week, sequential cohort study (both studies evaluated rivastigmine capsules 3-12 mg/day); study US38 was a 25-week, randomised, parallel-group, open-label study which investigated switch (immediate or after 7 days' withdrawal) from donepezil to rivastigmine transdermal patch (4.6 mg/24 hr). Safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs), discontinuations caused by AEs and serious AEs (SAEs).

RESULTS

Patient groups receiving rivastigmine patch (n = 261) or capsules (n = 331) had mean +/- SD ages of 77.3 +/- 8.0 and 78.1 +/- 7.8 years, dementia durations of 3.9 +/- 2.6 and 3.6 +/- 2.2 years and Mini-Mental State Examination scores of 18.3 +/- 4.00 and 17.9 +/- 4.4 respectively. Overall, 184 (70.5%) and 276 (83.4%) patients experienced at least one AE, and 23 (8.8%) and 55 (16.6%) patients experienced an SAE with the rivastigmine patch and capsules respectively. Of the patients who experienced an AE, 10 (3.8%) and 109 (32.9%) experienced nausea, and 11 (4.2%) and 80 (24.1%) experienced vomiting with the rivastigmine patch and capsules respectively. Discontinuations because of AEs occurred in 64 (19.3%) patients receiving capsules and 38 (14.6%) patients in the transdermal patch group. The most common reasons for discontinuation with the transdermal patch were application site reaction and disease progression, and nausea and vomiting with the capsules.

CONCLUSIONS

The rivastigmine transdermal patch appears to have better tolerability than rivastigmine capsules, with fewer gastrointestinal AEs and discontinuations because of these AEs. Simple daily rotation of patch location will likely reduce the frequency of skin reactions. This post hoc analysis was carried out by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Data for the analysis were collected from the US13 study (CENA713B US13), the US18 study (CENA713B US18) and the US38 study (CENA713D US38).

Long-term treatment of patients with Alzheimer's disease in primary and secondary care: results from an international survey

OBJECTIVE

The International Outcomes Survey in Dementia (IOSID) was initiated to observe the effects of current standard of care for Alzheimer's disease (AD) on patient outcomes and caregiver burden in a real-life setting.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This 2-year, international, prospective, longitudinal and observational cohort survey involved patients with mild-to-moderate AD (Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE] scores of 10-26 points) living in an ordinary household at baseline. There was no intervention with regard to patient management. Primary informal caregivers were also included in the survey.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patient parameters assessed included the MMSE, Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD), Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), and Clinical Global Impression (CGI). Caregiver burden was evaluated with the Zarit Burden Interview and caregiver distress was assessed as part of the NPI. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored.

RESULTS

Of 2288 patients recruited, 1382 (60.4%) completed the survey. At baseline, the majority (79.3%) of patients were receiving treatment with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs) or/and memantine. MMSE, DAD, NPI and CGI scores all showed that patients experienced deterioration of AD symptoms during the survey. MMSE scores declined less steeply than might have been expected based on historical data. Scores on the four outcome scales were significantly correlated at all time points. Mean caregivers' feeling of strain and caregiver distress increased during the survey. AEs occurring in more than 2% of patients were nausea (3.0%), injury (2.6%), fall (2.4%), depression (2.2%) and urinary tract infection (2.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Community patients with AD experience progressive and interconnected decline in cognition, behaviour and functioning over time, placing increased burden on caregivers. However, improved care in recent years, including AChEI use, might be reflected in slower rates of patient decline than were evident in the past. Overall, relatively low rates of AEs were apparent during the survey. Limitations of this survey included a smaller than anticipated number of recruited patients confounding the possibility of performing comprehensive subgroup analyses, and the lack of randomisation inherent in the survey methodology.