Second trimester fetal magnetic resonance imaging improves diagnosis of non-central nervous system anomalies

Magnetic resonance imaging in the second trimester as a complement to ultrasound for diagnosis of fetal anomalies

Background

Fetal ultrasound has limitations, especially if the patient is obese or in cases with oligohydramnios. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can then be used as a complement, but only few studies have focused on examinations in the second trimester.

Purpose

To validate MRI as a complement to diagnose fetal anomalies in the second trimester.

Material and Methods

This retrospective study retrieved data from January 2008 to July 2012 from the Fetal Medicine Unit and Department of Radiology at Uppsala University Hospital. Ultrasound and MRI findings were reviewed in 121 fetuses in relation to the final diagnosis, including postpartum follow-up and autopsy results.

Results

Of the 121 fetuses, 51 (42%) had a CNS anomaly and 70 (58%) a non-CNS anomaly diagnosed or suspected. MRI provided additional information in 21% of all cases without changing the management and revealed information that changed the management of the pregnancy in 13%. When a CNS anomaly was detected or suspected, the MRI provided additional information in 22% and changed the management in 10%. The corresponding figures for non-CNS cases were 21% and 16%, respectively. The proportion of cases with additional information that changed the management was especially high in patients with a BMI >30 kg/m2 (25%) and in patients with oligohydramnios (38%). In five cases in category III, false-positive ultrasound findings were identified.

Conclusions

MRI in the second trimester complements ultrasound and improves diagnosis of fetal CNS- and non-CNS anomalies especially when oligohydramnios or maternal obesity is present.

Fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enhances the diagnosis of congenital body anomalies

AIMS

We sought to assess variability and concordance between fetal MRI and ultrasound (USS) in the evaluation of fetal body abnormalities.

METHODS

All fetal body anomalies reported on F-MRI within the iFIND database (http://www.ifindproject.com) were included. Differences in findings regarding anomalies on contemporaneous USS were explored. Three clinical specialists evaluated each case independently, and the anomaly severity was graded: as "insignificant" to "lethal". The value of MRI in alteration of either antenatal or postnatal care was established.

RESULTS

Fifty-four cases were identified consisting of 5 healthy controls, 37 with USS-identified body anomalies, and 12 with known CNS or cardiac anomalies. In fetuses with a known body anomaly, information on the MRI was relevant to change the clinical course in 59% of cases. There was also an incidental detection rate of 7% in fetuses with known cardiac or CNS anomalies, or 1.5% of normal control, although these were rarely clinically relevant. Importantly, fetuses undergoing MRI for cardiac concerns did have major anomalies that were missed (one case of oesophageal atresia and two cases of ARM).

CONCLUSIONS

In cases where fetal anomalies are suspected, F-MRI is a valuable means of further characterizing anomalies and may detect additional anomalies in fetuses with recognized cardiac or CNS anomalies. In fetuses with a recognized body anomaly, more than half of those scanned by MRI had information available which changed clinical management. Importantly there were also incidental findings in healthy control fetuses, so the management of these needs to be recognized in fetal MRI research.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II, Prospective cohort study.

Utility of Fetal Magnetic Resonance Imaging After Ultrasound in Differentiating Dicephalic Dibrachius Dipus Twin Gestation From Craniopagus Parasiticus

Conjoined twins represent a very rare congenital anomaly, and the dicephalic dibrachius dipus (DDD) type of conjoined twinning is so rare that the exact prevalence is unknown. Only a few published case studies have mentioned this anomaly. Not enough data are available where antenatal ultrasonography (USG) and MRI have been employed in the workup of such cases. This study describes the case of a 24-year-old woman who came to our department for an anomaly scan at 25 weeks of gestation and was diagnosed with a dicephalic type of conjoined twinning with multiple anomalies. However, USG could not differentiate between DDD twinning and craniopagus parasiticus; hence, the patient was referred for fetal MRI. On MRI, the diagnosis of DDD was confirmed. In craniopagus parasiticus twinning, the surgical removal of the parasitic head can allow an everyday life. However, DDD twinning with multiple anomalies is not compatible with life, and the mother was thoroughly explained the grave prognosis. In such doubtful cases, fetal MRI should always be employed to ascertain the diagnosis for proper management and counseling.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Second and Third Trimester Screening for Fetal Anomaly

The Appropriateness Criteria for the imaging screening of second and third trimester fetuses for anomalies are presented for fetuses that are low risk, high risk, have had soft markers detected on ultrasound, and have had major anomalies detected on ultrasound. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

MRI-Derived Fetal Weight Estimation in the Midpregnancy Fetus: A Method Comparison Study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the standard ultrasound (US) estimated fetal weight (EFW) and MRI volume-derived methods for the midtrimester fetus.

METHODS

Twenty-five paired US and MRI scans had the EFW calculated (gestational age [GA] range = 20-26 weeks). The intra- and interobserver variability of each method was assessed (2 operators/modality). A small sub-analysis was performed on 5 fetuses who were delivered preterm (mean GA 29 +3 weeks) and compared to the actual birthweight.

RESULTS

Two MRI volumetry EFW formulae under-measured compared to US by -10.9% and -14.5% in the midpregnancy fetus (p < 0.001) but had excellent intra- and interobserver agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.998 and 0.993). In the preterm fetus, the mean relative difference (MRD) between the MRI volume-derived EFW (MRI-EFW) and actual expected birthweight (at the scan GA) was -13.7% (-159.0 g, 95% CI: -341.7 to 23.7 g) and -17.1% (-204.6 g, 95% CI: -380.4 to -28.8 g), for the 2 MRI formulae. The MRD was smaller for US at 5.3% (69.8 g, 95% CI: -34.3 to 173.9).

CONCLUSIONS

MRI-EFW results should be interpreted with caution in midpregnancy. Despite excellent observer agreement with MRI volumetry, refinement of the EFW formula is needed in the second trimester, for the small and for the GA and preterm fetus to compensate for lower fetal densities.

Fetal dynamic magnetic resonance imaging using Doppler ultrasound gating for the assessment of the aortic isthmus: A feasibility study

INTRODUCTION

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is established in cardiac evaluation in postnatal life, but its application to the fetus has been hampered by technical limitations. We aimed to investigate the feasibility of dynamic MRI of the fetal aortic isthmus using a magnetic resonance-compatible Doppler ultrasound device for cardiac gating.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This prospective study included 19 fetuses at a median gestational age of 32.3 weeks (range 26-38 weeks). Imaging of the fetal aortic isthmus was assessed by (a) dynamic steady-state free precession MRI using a magnetic resonance-compatible Doppler ultrasound device for cardiac gating and (b) echocardiography. Diameters of the aortic isthmus were compared by two blinded observers. Magnetic resonance image quality was assessed independently by two observers using a four-point scale (1 = low quality, 4 = high quality). Furthermore, we performed four-dimensional flow MRI of the fetal aorta in three of these fetuses.

RESULTS

The Doppler ultrasound device for cardiac gating allowed successful dynamic MRI examinations of the aortic isthmus in 18/19 (95%) fetuses. Evaluation of the fetal aortic isthmus was possible by both MRI (15/18, 83%) and echocardiography (16/18, 89%) (P < .05). Diameters of the aortic isthmus were concordant for MRI (3.8 ± 0.9 mm) and echocardiography (4.0 ± 1.1 mm), with a variability of 10.8% (bias -2.3%, 95% limits of agreement -23.9% to 19.3%). Overall magnetic resonance image quality was good (score 4 in 67% and score 3 in 23%) with good inter-observer agreement (κ = 0.75; 95% CI 0.5-1). Fetal four-dimensional flow MRI allowed visualization of aortic flow dynamics.

CONCLUSIONS

Doppler ultrasound-gating allows dynamic MRI of the fetal aorta with the potential to serve as a complementary imaging tool in cases where echocardiography is inconclusive.

The use of fetal MRI for renal and urogenital tract anomalies

Fetal anomalies are detected in approximately 2% of all fetuses and, among these, genitourinary tract abnormalities account for 30% to 50% of all structural anomalies present at birth. Although ultrasound remains the first line diagnostic modality, fetal MRI provides important additional structural and functional information, especially with the development of faster sequences and the use of functional sequences. The added value of MRI-based imaging is three-fold: (a) improvement of diagnostic accuracy by adequate morphological examination, (b) detection of additional anomalies, and (c) in addition, MRI has the potential to provide information regarding renal function. In this review, we describe the role of fetal MRI in the anatomical evaluation of renal and urogenital tract anomalies, and we also touch upon the contribution of functional MRI to the diagnostic workup of these conditions.

Applicability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Assessment of Fetal Urinary Tract Malformations

OBJECTIVE

To assess the applicability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to complement ultrasound in the diagnosis of fetal urinary tract anomalies.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study that included 41 women between 19 weeks and 37 weeks and 6 days of gestation carrying fetuses with malformations of the urinary tract which were initially diagnosed by ultrasound and then referred for MRI. In all cases, the diagnosis was confirmed after birth either through imaging or autopsy. A surface coil was positioned over the abdomen and T2-weighted sequences were obtained in the axial, coronal, and sagittal planes; T1 in at least one plane; and three-dimensional (3-D) TRUFI in fetuses with dilatation of the urinary tract.

RESULTS

Mean gestational age at the time of MRI examination was 28.21 weeks. The rapid T2 sequences allowed all the anomalies of the fetal urinary tract to be assessed, whereas 3-D TRUFI sequencing proved very useful in evaluating anomalies involving dilatation of the urinary tract. The signs of pulmonary hypoplasia characterized by hypointense signal in the T2-weighted sequences were identified in 13 of the 41 fetuses.

CONCLUSION

MRI confirmed and added information to the ultrasound regarding fetal urinary tract anomalies, as well as information related to the other associated malformations, their progress in the prenatal period, and possible postnatal prognosis.

Prenatal diagnosis of suprarenal mass by magnetic resonance imaging: a case series

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the perinatal outcomes and postnatal follow-up of prenatally diagnosed suprarenal masses (SRMs) evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: Thirteen fetuses with SRMs detected during routine prenatal ultrasound screening were evaluated by MRI between February 2007 and May 2015. The prenatal characteristics of the masses, complications of the pregnancies, and related malformations were collected as the postnatal clinical, radiological, and pathological data. Results: The median gestational age at MRI was 30 weeks (18-41), and birth weight was 3285 (1700-3750) g. The mean follow-up period was 6 years (1.3-10). We observed 69.2% of the masses, which were predominantly cystic (69.2%), located on the left side. Associated malformations were found in 23% of the fetuses, with congenital heart defects being more prevalent. During the pregnancy, 15.4% of the fetuses had involution of the SRM, and one fetus had surgical treatment and different ultrasound and MRI diagnoses. Of the 69.2% of the cases, spontaneous resolution occurred in 30.7% during the first year of life and 38.4% the masses presented without modifications or signs of regression since the neonatal period. Conclusions: Prenatal SRMs were associated with congenital heart defects. Spontaneous regression and absence of modifications in the masses were commonly observed in the long-term follow-up of the SRMs.

Highlights on MRI of the fetal body

Fetal MRI is a level III diagnostic tool performed subsequently a level II prenatal ultrasound (US), in cases of inconclusive ultrasonographic diagnosis or when a further investigation is required to confirm or improve the diagnosis, to plan an appropriate pregnancy management. Fetal MRI plays an increasingly important role in the prenatal diagnosis of fetal neck, chest and abdominal malformations, even if its role has been amply demonstrated, especially, in the field of fetal CNS anomalies. Due to its multiparametricity and multiplanarity, MRI provides a detailed evaluation of the whole fetal respiratory, gastrointestinal and genitourinary systems, especially on T2-weighted (W) images, with a good tissue contrast resolution. In the evaluation of the digestive tract, T1-W sequences are very important in relation to the typical hyperintensity of the large intestine, due to the presence of meconium. The objective of this review is to focus on the application of fetal MRI in neck, chest and abdominal diseases.

Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of fetal anomalies: a blinded case-control study

OBJECTIVES

To compare the accuracy of two-dimensional ultrasound (2D-US), three-dimensional ultrasound (3D-US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the diagnosis of congenital anomalies without prior knowledge of indications and previous imaging findings.

METHODS

This was a prospective, blinded case-control study comprising women with a singleton pregnancy with fetal congenital abnormalities identified on clinical ultrasound and those with an uncomplicated pregnancy. All women volunteered to undergo 2D-US, 3D-US and MRI, which were performed at one institution. Different examiners at a collaborating institution performed image interpretation. Sensitivity and specificity of the three imaging methods were calculated for individual anomalies, based on postnatal imaging and/or autopsy as the definitive diagnosis. Diagnostic confidence was graded on a four-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

A total of 157 singleton pregnancies were enrolled, however nine cases were excluded owing to incomplete outcome, resulting in 148 fetuses (58 cases and 90 controls) included in the final analysis. Among cases, 13 (22.4%) had central nervous system (CNS) anomalies, 40 (69.0%) had non-CNS anomalies and five (8.6%) had both CNS and non-CNS anomalies. The main findings were: (1) MRI was more sensitive than 3D-US for diagnosing CNS anomalies (MRI, 88.9% (16/18) vs 3D-US, 66.7% (12/18) vs 2D-US, 72.2% (13/18); McNemar's test for MRI vs 3D-US: P = 0.046); (2) MRI provided additional information affecting prognosis and/or counseling in 22.2% (4/18) of fetuses with CNS anomalies; (3) 2D-US, 3D-US and MRI had similar sensitivity for diagnosing non-CNS anomalies; (4) specificity for all anomalies was highest for 3D-US (MRI, 85.6% (77/90) vs 3D-US, 94.4% (85/90) vs 2D-US, 92.2% (83/90); McNemar's test for MRI vs 3D-US: P = 0.03); and (5) the confidence of MRI for ruling out certain CNS abnormalities (usually questionable for cortical dysplasias or hemorrhage) that were not confirmed after delivery was lower than it was for 2D-US and 3D-US.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI was more sensitive than ultrasonography and provided additional information that changed prognosis, counseling or management in 22.2% of fetuses with CNS anomalies. False-positive diagnoses for subtle CNS findings were higher with MRI than with ultrasonography. Copyright © 2015 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Fetal magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been increasingly adopted in obstetrics practice in the past three decades. MRI aids prenatal ultrasound and improves diagnostic accuracy for selected maternal and fetal conditions. However, it should be considered only when high-quality ultrasound cannot provide certain information that affects the counseling, prenatal intervention, pregnancy course, and delivery plan. Major indications of fetal MRI include, but are not restricted to, morbidly adherent placenta, selected cases of fetal brain anomalies, thoracic lesions (especially in severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia), and soft tissue tumors at head and neck regions of the fetus. For fetal anatomy assessment, a 1.5-Tesla machine with a fast T2-weighted single-shot technique is recommended for image requisition of common fetal abnormalities. Individual judgment needs to be applied when considering usage of a 3-Tesla machine. Gadolinium MRI contrast is not recommended during pregnancy. MRI should be avoided in the first half of pregnancy due to small fetal structures and motion artifacts. Assessment of fetal cerebral cortex can be achieved with MRI in the third trimester. MRI is a viable research tool for noninvasive interrogation of the fetus and the placenta.

Overcoming foetal motion using interactive real-time magnetic resonance imaging

OBJECTIVE

Foetal MRI has become an established image modality in the prenatal diagnosis of CNS anomalies, but image quality can be severely affected by foetal movements. The objective was to overcome these inherent motion problems by applying interactive real-time MRI and to evaluate the diagnostic usefulness of the applied real-time MRI sequence in relation to standard protocols.

METHODS

Ten healthy foetuses (gestation week 21·3 ± 0·5) were scanned using a system, which allowed visual feedback and interactive slice positioning in real time. The data were compared to a control group of 14 healthy foetuses (gestation week 21·0 ± 0·8) who had previously been scanned using standard MRI. Comparisons were carried out by two radiologists with regard to cerebral anthropometric sizes, presence of important brain structures, degree of movement, clinical image value, image quality and ability to obtain correct slice planes.

RESULTS

Two out of eight anthropometric sizes were statistically different between the two groups. Representation of cerebral structures was found in 70-100% in the real-time group. No statistically differences were found in clinical image value and image quality. The mean ability to obtain optimal slice planes was higher in the real-time group, but it was not significant.

CONCLUSION

Imaging of the foetal brain using the proposed interactive real-time MRI system is a promising alternative to traditional foetal MRI for anthropometrics or as a supplement for the representation of foetal brain structures in cases in which foetal motion causes challenges in relation to obtaining optimal slice planes using conventional MRI techniques.

Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the prenatal diagnosis of gastrointestinal fetal anomalies

PURPOSE

This study was done to evaluate the role of fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the study of gastrointestinal malformations in comparison to prenatal ultrasound (US).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective (2010-2012) study of 38 fetal MRI scans was performed on 38 fetuses between 24 and 38 weeks of gestation. All the fetuses had a US diagnosis of gastrointestinal anomalies. T2-weighted HASTE, T1-weighted fast gradient echo, TrueFISP and diffusion-weighted images of the fetal abdomen were obtained on a 1.5-Tesla magnet. All fetal MRI diagnoses were compared with postnatal US findings, autopsy or surgical reports.

RESULTS

Fetal MRI was able to confirm the sonographic findings in nine of 38 fetuses (23.7%), to provide additional information in 23 of 38 fetuses (60.6%), to exclude the US diagnosis in five cases (5.2%) and to change it in two cases (5.2%). It was not able to characterize a case of gastric duplication and a case of abdominal cystic lymphangioma (5.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Fetal MRI can be used as a complementary imaging modality to US in prenatal evaluation of gastrointestinal anomalies and can be considered a valuable tool not only for confirming or excluding but also for providing additional information to fetal ultrasonographic findings.

False positive morphologic diagnoses at the anomaly scan: marginal or real problem, a population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Congenital malformations occur in 3-4% of live births. Their prenatal detection is performed by ultrasound screening. Any announcement about a suspected malformation is a source of stress for the parents, and misdiagnosis during ultrasound screening can lead to expensive and sometimes iatrogenic medical interventions. In this study, we aim to determine the false-positive rate, first overall and then by anatomical system, of ultrasound screening for congenital malformations in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy.

METHODS

Our sample includes all children born between 1 January, 2006, and 31 December, 2009, in the French region of Auvergne, whose mother had a prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of a congenital malformation during the second or third trimester of pregnancy confirmed by a follow-up ultrasound examination by an expert consultant ultrasonographer. The study included 526 fetuses, divided in 3 groups: false positives, diagnostic misclassifications, and true positives. The rates of false positives and diagnostic misclassifications were calculated for the sample as a whole and then by anatomical system.

RESULTS

Overall, the false-positive rate was 8.8% and the rate of diagnostic misclassification 9.2%. The highest false-positive rates were found for renal and gastrointestinal tract malformations, and the highest diagnostic misclassification rates for cerebral and cardiac malformations. The diagnostic misclassification rate was significantly higher than the false-positive rate for cardiac malformations.

CONCLUSION

The false-positive rate during prenatal ultrasound is not insignificant; these misdiagnoses cause psychological stress for the parents and overmedicalisation of the pregnancy and the child.

Standardized fetal anatomical examination using magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a standard complete fetal anatomical survey, as recommended for ultrasound examination guidelines, is feasible using a standardized magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol.

METHODS

Based on guidelines for ultrasound examination, we created a specific MRI protocol for fetal anatomical survey. This protocol was then tested prospectively in 100 women undergoing fetal MRI examination for various specific indications at a median gestational age of 30 weeks. The feasibility of using MRI to perform the fetal anatomical survey was analyzed by two reviewers (A and B) based on 26 predefined anatomical criteria, yielding a score ranging from 0 to 26 (26 meaning successful complete anatomical study). Reproducibility was analyzed using percentage agreement and modified kappa statistics.

RESULTS

The mean score for the standardized MRI anatomical survey was 24.6 (SD, 1.4; range, 15-26) for Reviewer A and 24.2 (SD, 1.7; range, 15-26) for Reviewer B (P = 0.1). Twenty-two, two and two criteria could be assessed in > 95%, 80-95% and < 80% of cases by Reviewer A and 19, four and three criteria could be assessed in > 95%, 80-95% and < 80% of cases by Reviewer B. For both reviewers, the two most difficult criteria to evaluate were aorta and pulmonary artery. Inter-reviewer agreement was above 90% for 22 of the 26 anatomical criteria and adjusted kappa coefficients for each criterion demonstrated good, moderate and poor agreement for 22, two and two criteria, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our data support the hypothesis that standardized fetal anatomical examination might be achieved and reproducible using MRI, although improvement is required for the cardiac part of the examination.

Techniques, terminology, and indications for MRI in pregnancy

Fetal MRI is now a well-established imaging modality for the diagnostic evaluation of fetuses with congenital anomalies. In this article, the authors provide a brief overview of the physical principles involved in fetal MRI imaging, the sequences that are used in clinical practice today, current indications, and limitations. A review of current evidence supports the following indications for fetal MRI: suspected central nervous system anomalies, neck and oropharyngeal masses, diaphragmatic hernia, abdominal masses or bowel pathology not fully characterized by ultrasonography, and suspected fetal infection. Other indications should be decided on a case-by-case basis with close collaboration between the departments of maternal-fetal medicine and radiology. More research is needed to determine the role of fetal MRI in functional neuroimaging at higher magnetic field strengths (3T).