Retinal examination intervals in diabetic patients on diet treatment only

Evidence-based Danish guidelines for screening of diabetic retinopathy

PURPOSE

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is among the leading causes of visual loss in the working-age population. It is generally accepted that screening of DR is cost-effective and can detect DR before it becomes sight-threatening to allow timely treatment.

METHODS

A group of retinal specialists was formed by the Danish Ophthalmological Society with the aim to formulate contemporary evidence-based guidelines for screening of DR in order to implement these in the Danish screening system.

RESULTS

We hereby present evidence for DR-screening regarding (1) classification of DR, (2) examination techniques, (3) screening intervals and (4) automated screening. It is our recommendation that the International Clinical Retinopathy Disease Severity Scale should be used to classify DR. As a minimum, mydriatic two-field disc- and macular-centred images are required. In the case of suspected clinically significant diabetic macular oedema, supplementary optical coherence tomography can increase the diagnostic accuracy. There is solid evidence to support a flexible, individualized screening regimen. In particular, it is possible to prolong screening intervals to 24-48 months for patients with no or mild nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), but it is also possible to use extended intervals of 12-24 months for patients with moderate NPDR given that these are well-regulated regarding glycaemic control (HbA1c ≤ 53 mmol/mol) and blood pressure (≤130/80 mmHg). Automated screening of DR is encouraging but is not ready for implementation at present.

CONCLUSION

Danish evidenced-based guidelines for screening of DR support high-quality imaging and allow flexible, individualized screening intervals with a potential for extension to patients with low risk of DR progression.

The Prognostic Value of Post-Treatment Retinopathy after Panretinal Photocoagulation for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy in Type 1 Diabetes

PURPOSE

To study the prognostic value of post-treatment retinopathy after panretinal laser photocoagulation for proliferative diabetic retinopathy in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Proliferative diabetic retinopathy is treated with panretinal photocoagulation, which significantly reduces the risk of visual loss from this complication. However, no parameters are presently known that can be used to define an optimal control interval after the initial panretinal photocoagulation treatment that ensures enhancement of the treatment in cases where this is needed.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, 85 eyes from 56 type 1 diabetic patients were identified who had been subjected to panretinal photocoagulation for proliferative diabetic retinopathy before 1990. The patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 had four or fewer microaneurysms only at the first post-treatment examination whereas Group 2 had more retinopathy.

RESULTS

At the first photographic examination after treatment the eyes in Group 1 had a significantly lower visual acuity (VA) (mean =0.23, range: 0.01-1.00) than the patients in Group 2 (mean=0.48, range: 0.01-1.6). During the follow-up period the VA was further reduced in Group 2 but not in Group 1. Three eyes out of six in Group 1 had improvement of VA from below to above 0.1, whereas 6 eyes out of 12 in Group 2 experienced progression of retinopathy with a consequent worsening of VA to below 0.1 after a mean of 10.8 years (range: 6.8-15.9) after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The severity of post-treatment retinopathy can be used to assess the need for enhancing photocoagulation of proliferative diabetic retinopathy in type 1 diabetes. The interval between post-treatment examinations can be increased to several years when the initial treatment has reduced retinopathy to a minimal level.

Eye disease and the older diabetic

Elderly diabetic persons are 1.5 times more likely than age-matched nondiabetic persons to develop vision loss and blindness. Annually, between 12,000 and 24,000 diabetic patients in the United States become legally blind because of complications caused by diabetic retinopathy. Even more diabetic persons experience vision loss caused by comorbid ocular and periocular conditions such as dry eye syndrome, cataracts, macular degeneration, and glaucoma. This article discusses the synergy between these conditions and diabetes. Standards of care that slow the progression of vision loss and exciting new research on new strategies of care that may reverse vision loss are presented.

Single-field fundus photography for diabetic retinopathy screening: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether single-field fundus photography can be used as a screening tool to identify diabetic retinopathy for referral for further ophthalmic care.

METHODS

A MEDLINE search of the peer-reviewed literature was conducted in June 2001 for the years 1968 to 2001 and updated in September 2003, yielding 145 articles. The search was limited to articles published in English. The Cochrane Library of clinical trials was also investigated. The authors reviewed the abstracts of these articles and selected 63 of possible clinical relevance for review by the panel. Of these 63 articles, the panel selected 32 for the panel methodologist to review and rate according to the strength of evidence.

RESULTS

Three of the 32 articles reviewed were classified as level I evidence, and 4 were classified as level II evidence. Evidence from level I studies demonstrates that as a tool to detect vision-threatening retinopathy, single-field fundus photography interpreted by trained readers has sensitivity ranging from 61% to 90% and specificity ranging from 85% to 97% when compared with the gold standard reference of stereophotographs of 7 standard fields. When compared with dilated ophthalmoscopy by an ophthalmologist, single-field fundus photography has sensitivity ranging from 38% to 100% and specificity ranging from 75% to 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-field fundus photography is not a substitute for a comprehensive ophthalmic examination, but there is level I evidence that it can serve as a screening tool for diabetic retinopathy to identify patients with retinopathy for referral for ophthalmic evaluation and management. The advantages of single-field fundus photography interpreted by trained readers are ease of use (only one photograph is required), convenience, and ability to detect retinopathy. Further studies will be required to assess the implementation of single-field photography-based programs to confirm the clinical and cost-effectiveness of these techniques in improving population visual outcomes. Future research also should include establishing standardized protocols and satisfactory performance standards for diabetic retinopathy screening programs.

A review of current research on the effect of diabetes mellitus on the eye

It is estimated that almost one million Australians will have diabetes by the year 2000. Of those with diabetes a significant proportion will have eye-related conditions, the most debilitating being diabetic retinopathy. Appropriate identification and treatment can result in prevention of visual loss and blindness. The importance of diabetes as a cause of blindness in our community is realised by the commencement of a national program by the National Health and Medical Research Council to develop clinical practice guidelines for the management of diabetic retinopathy. The development of these guidelines was based on available evidence following an extensive review of the literature up to May 1996. This review is a summary of our advances in research on the effect of diabetes on various aspects of the eye and vision over the past two years. This review is a compilation of articles of research on the effect of diabetes on various aspects of the eye and vision. As a result of the enormous amount of effort and work by scientists and clinicians around the world, as well as space restrictions, the review covers the past two years only. Although every effort has been made to include as many research articles as possible, not all articles of research are covered. It is intended that this review provide an overview of the latest trends in research, particularly relating to new techniques and methods in the study of diabetes in ocular tissue as well as the new theories in the development of ocular damage to each of the tissue.