Remoxipride and haloperidol in the acute phase of schizophrenia: a double-blind comparison

The effects of atypical antipsychotic medications on psychosocial outcomes

This review examines the question--Do atypical antipsychotic medications improve psychosocial outcomes?--by examining studies that compared the effects of atypicals to conventional antipsychotics or to other atypical medications. The authors reviewed randomized clinical trials of atypical antipsychotic medication that included psychosocial variables as outcomes. Findings from 31 published studies on more than 12,000 individuals generally showed that atypical medications led to significant improvements in negative symptoms compared to conventional antipsychotics. Effects on global assessment of psychosocial functioning and on the quality of life were mixed with only about half the studies reporting significant improvements. Olanzapine yielded the best results on psychosocial functioning; remoxipride was found to yield few significant changes on these variables. This review provides evidence that some atypical antipsychotics may have direct effects on some of the psychosocial disabilities that result from serious mental illness.

Design and reporting modifications in industry-sponsored comparative psychopharmacology trials

This review of recently published pharmaceutical industry-sponsored comparative psychotropic drug trials aims to classify apparent design and reporting modifications that favor the sponsor's product. The modifications have been grouped into 13 discrete categories, and representative examples of each are presented. Strong circumstantial evidence suggests that marketing goals led to these adjustments. The consequences of marketing influences on comparative psychopharmacology trials are discussed in terms of conflicts of interest, the integrity of the scientific literature, and costs to consumers, as well as their impact on physician practice.

Pharmacology of the atypical antipsychotic remoxipride, a dopamine D2 receptor antagonist

Remoxipride is a substituted benzamide that acts as a weak but very selective antagonist of dopamine D2 receptors. It was introduced by Astra (Roxiam) at the end of the eighties and was prescribed as an atypical antipsychotic. This article reviews its putative selective effects on mesolimbic versus nigrostriatal dopaminergic systems. In animals, remoxipride has minimal cataleptic effects at doses that block dopamine agonist-induced hyperactivity. These findings are predictive of antipsychotic activity with a low likelihood of extrapyramidal symptoms. Remoxipride also appears to be effective in more recent animal models of schizophrenia, such as latent inhibition or prepulse inhibition. In clinical studies, remoxipride shows a relatively low incidence of extrapyramidal side effects and its effects on prolactin release are short-lasting and generally mild. The clinical efficacy of remoxipride is similar to that of haloperidol or chlorpromazine. Although its clinical use was severely restricted in 1993, due to reports of aplastic anemia in some patients receiving remoxipride, this drug has been found to exhibit relatively high selectivity for dopamine D2 receptors making remoxipride an interesting tool for neurochemical and behavioral studies.

Mechanisms of action of atypical antipsychotic drugs: a critical analysis

Various criteria used to define atypical antipsychotic drugs include: 1) decrease, or absence, of the capacity to cause acute extrapyramidal motor side effects (acute EPSE) and tardive dyskinesia (TD); 2) increased therapeutic efficacy reflected by improvement in positive, negative, or cognitive symptoms; 3) and a decrease, or absence, of the capacity to increase prolactin levels. The pharmacologic basis of atypical antipsychotic drug activity has been the target of intensive study since the significance of clozapine was first appreciated. Three notions have been utilized conceptually to explain the distinction between atypical versus typical antipsychotic drugs: 1) dose-response separation between particular pharmacologic functions; 2) anatomic specificity of particular pharmacologic activities; 3) neurotransmitter receptor interactions and pharmacodynamics. These conceptual bases are not mutually exclusive, and the demonstration of limbic versus extrapyramidal motor functional selectivity is apparent within each arbitrary theoretical base. This review discusses salient distinctions predominantly between prototypic atypical and typical antipsychotic drugs such as clozapine and haloperidol, respectively. In addition, areas of common function between atypical and typical antipsychotic drug action may also be crucial to our identification of pathophysiological foci of the different dimensions of schizophrenia, including positive symptoms, negative symptoms, and neurocognitive deficits.

The Australian multicentre double-blind comparative study of remoxipride and thioridazine in schizophrenia

A double-blind, randomized study of parallel group design comparing remoxipride and thioridazine (dose range 150-600 mg/day of either drug) was undertaken at 11 Australian centres. A total of 144 patients (remoxipride = 73, thioridazine = 71) with DSM-III-R schizophrenia or schizophreniform disorder commenced the study, and 89 patients (remoxipride = 45, thioridazine = 44) completed the 6 weeks of the trial. The mean daily doses at last rating were 404 mg (remoxipride) and 378 mg (thioridazine). Initial Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale scores decreased by a mean 8.7 points in both remoxipride and thioridazine groups. Equivalent treatment responses were also confirmed by Clinical Global Impression. During the study, sedatives or hypnotics were needed by 68% of the remoxipride patients and 51% of the thioridazine patients. Thioridazine was associated with more postural hypotension, drowsiness, increased sleep, headache, dizziness on rising, dry mouth, sexual dysfunction and weight gain, while remoxipride patients reported more insomnia. There were no differences between remoxipride and thioridazine on dystonia, hypokinesia, dyskinesia, rigidity and akathisia. The results indicate that remoxipride has similar antipsychotic efficacy to thioridazine but causes fewer side effects.

Treatment of schizophrenia: a clinical and preclinical evaluation of neuroleptic drugs

Forty years after the first clinical report on the effectiveness of chlorpromazine in psychiatric patients, neuroleptic drugs are still the most widely used drugs in the treatment of schizophrenia. Indeed, there are no other drugs which have proven to be as effective in the treatment of this severe psychiatric disorder. Yet, there are still many unresolved problems relating to neuroleptic drugs. The present review gives a comprehensive overview of our knowledge (and our lack of knowledge) with respect to the clinical and preclinical effects of neuroleptic drugs and tries to integrate this knowledge in order to identify the neuronal mechanisms underlying the therapeutic and side effects of neuroleptic drugs.

Clinical profile of remoxipride--a combined analysis of a comparative double-blind multicentre trial programme

Nine double-blind studies comparing remoxipride to haloperidol in the treatment of acute schizophrenia formed the basis of this analysis. All studies followed a basic protocol with the main assessments performed regularly during the 4-6 week trial period according to the same methodology, thus allowing the data to be pooled. The results showed that remoxipride in a daily dose of 150-600 mg had a therapeutic effect comparable to that of haloperidol (5-45 mg/day), both on positive and negative symptoms. There was a clear advantage for remoxipride over haloperidol with regard to adverse events/symptoms, particularly extrapyramidal symptoms, but also drowsiness/somnolence and tiredness/fatigue. Anticholinergic drugs were used consistently less frequently as concomitant medication to alleviate extrapyramidal symptoms in the remoxipride group: the use of sedatives/hypnotics was approximately the same in both groups. Based on these and supportive clinical data, remoxipride seems to have a clinical profile characterized by antipsychotic efficacy in acute schizophrenia, apparently equal to that of haloperidol, and good tolerability in being non-sedative (in terms of drowsiness/somnolence) and with low incidences of extrapyramidal, autonomic, and endocrine symptoms.