The Nordic Comparative Study on Sectorized Psychiatry: patients who use only psychiatric in-patient care in comprehensive community-based services--a 1-year follow-up study

Outpatient Follow-Up Visit after Hospital Discharge Lowers Risk of Rehospitalization in Patients with Schizophrenia: A Nationwide Population-Based Study

OBJECTIVE

Non-adherence to medication is a recognized problem in psychiatric patients and may be one of the most challenging aspects of treatment for patients with schizophrenia. Failure of follow-up care after discharge greatly increases non-adherence to prescribed medications, relapse and rehospitalization. However, it is still unknown whether and how much outpatient follow-up visits can mitigate the risk of rehospitalization. Therefore we sought to investigate the continuity and effectiveness of outpatient care after inpatient discharge and its effect on rehospitalization of patients with schizophrenia.

METHODS

Data were extracted from National Health Insurance Claim Database covering the period from 2007 through 2010. We identified 10,246 patients aged 18 years or older who were admitted in psychiatric facilities with the diagnosis of schizophrenia between January 1 and December 31 in 2007. The number of outpatient visits within 60 days after discharge from index admission was defined as the indicator for the continuous care and rehospitalization was inspected during the following 36-month period. Cox's proportional hazard model was used to examine the factors affecting the risk of rehospitalization including the number of outpatient visits, age, sex, comorbidities, antipsychotics, and characteristics of medical institution.

RESULTS

We found that 12.7% (n=1,327) of the patients visited psychiatric outpatient department once within 60 days after hospital discharge, 34.8% (n=3,626) twice, and 27.8% (n=2,900) more than three times. Patients taking atypical antipsychotics showed higher proportion in 2 or more outpatient visits, whereas patients taking typical antipsychotics showed higher proportion in one or no outpatient visits. Cox hazard ratios of rehospitalization for the factor of 3 or more outpatient visits referenced to that of no follow-up visit were 0.567 (0.428-0.750, 95% confidence interval) within 90 days, 0.673 (0.574-0.789) within 180 days, 0.800 (0.713-0.898) within a year, 0.906 (0.824-0.997) within 2 years, and 0.993 (0.910-1.084) within 3 years.

CONCLUSION

Although continuous outpatient treatment is important for relapse prevention, patients with schizophrenia showed a low rate of outpatient visit as 62.6% of total patients in 2 or more visits within 60 days after discharge. Lack of follow-up treatment might lead to increase psychotic symptoms and raised risk of relapse and rehospitalization. Our data suggest that the number of outpatient visits within 60 days after discharge in patients with schizophrenia is an important indicator of rehospitalization within a year. Therefore, further efforts to examine factors affecting failure of outpatient follow-up after discharge are warranted.

A pilot study of the "Continuation of Care" model in "revolving-door" patients

PURPOSE

The efficiency of continuation of care (COC) treatment by inpatient caregivers as compared to treatment administered by outpatient services for "revolving door" psychiatric patients was tested in this study. Number and days of hospitalization were examined.

METHOD

All patients who were hospitalized three times or more during the past 12 months were offered continuing follow-up in the ward, by the same staff, instead of being referred to the outpatient department. Information on number and length of hospitalizations before and after initiation of this care model was retrieved from the hospital computerized database.

RESULTS

Of the 36 patients meeting the criteria, 35 patients agreed to participate. The number of hospitalizations in the 18 months following the index hospitalization was 1.79±3.51 as compared to 4.67±1.79 before the index hospitalization (p=0.0002), and the number of days of hospitalization 18 months after was 24±41.65 as compared to 119.71±69.31 before (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

COC via inpatient follow-up significantly reduces the number and length of hospitalizations in "revolving door" psychiatric patients as compared to the traditional system of follow-up in an outpatient clinic.

Disability pension for psychiatric disorders: regional differences in Norway 1988-2000

The aim of this study was to describe regional differences in the incidence of disability pensions (DPs) with psychiatric diagnoses, and to determine whether these differences were related to age and/or gender. We compared the incidence rates of new DPs including all diagnoses, with DP with psychiatric diagnoses in Norwegian regions from 1988 to 2000. The population at risk was all individuals aged 16-67 in each year. Individuals already on DP were excluded. Cases were collected from the Norwegian National Insurance Administration. The results showed that the incidence rate ratio (IRR; Norway reference) for DP with psychiatric diagnoses was most elevated for men 1.41 (95% CI 1.27-1.58) and women 1.48 (95% CI 1.34-1.64) living in the most rural region. Men in the urban area had a higher IRR, 1.33 (95% CI 1.26-1.40), than urban women, 1.02 (95% CI 0.96-1.07). The incidence more than doubled in the youngest age group (16-29 years) and decreased in the oldest age group (60-67 years) between 1988 and 2000. The findings conclude that individuals living in semi-rural regions of Norway are more likely to receive a DP with a psychiatric diagnosis than those living in urban areas. Large gender differences were found in the urban area. Further research is needed to investigate the impact of the psychiatric healthcare system and access to rehabilitation on psychiatric disability.

Pathways and outcomes of psychiatric care: does it depend on who you are, or what you've got?

OBJECTIVES

To investigate predictors of outcome and cost for patients treated by Mental Health Services in the south metropolitan area of Perth using logistic regression to control for potential confounding factors.

METHOD

Data were collected over a 3-month period on 2691 subjects (47% male, 53% female) as part of the Mental Health Classification and Services Cost Project.

RESULTS

The average age of subjects was 44.3 years. Nearly 80% of care occurred in community settings and virtually all inpatient care was for acute emergencies. The most common diagnosis was schizophrenia (33%) followed by mood disorders (30%). Within the study period, 88% of patients had only one episode of care (n = 2361) and a further 8% two (n = 223). Patients with schizophrenia were one-third as likely to be discharged from care (95% CI = 0.2-0.4) and 30% as likely to have longer episodes of care (95% CI = 1.1-1.6). Patients with personality, substance or adjustment disorders spent less time in treatment, and those with personality or substance disorders were more likely to be discharged from psychiatric care. A past history of inpatient care was associated with a worse outcome in terms of length of care, or not being successfully discharged. Severity of illness as determined by involuntary treatment or elevated Health of the Nation Outcome Scales and Life Skills Profile (LSP) scores was associated with increased costs. Greater disability on the LSP was also associated with increased length of care. Sociodemographic factors were as least as important as diagnosis in predicting the cost and outcome of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Demographic factors may better predict increased health service use than diagnostic casemix. Since sociodemographic variables contribute as much to outcome as diagnosis, comparing results between units is likely to be misleading unless adjusted for these factors.

The Swedish mental health system. Past, present, and future

In sum, the evolution, strengths, and weaknesses of the Swedish mental health system are quite similar to mental health systems in other Western countries; early reliance on stand-alone, state psychiatric hospitals, followed by deinstitutionalization and development of largely ambulatory, community mental health care. This evolution has been complicated in Sweden by the multiple levels and system components, the state, the county councils and the municipalities. Unlike the United States, but similar to Britain, community mental health care in Sweden is provided by two systems; treatment (and forensic services) by the county councils' mental health providers, and generic services by the municipalities' social welfare system. The resulting division of roles and responsibilities creates a strong need for collaboration and coordination of activities on behalf of consumers. It can also have the unintended disincentives to serving more difficult consumers. All these difficulties not withstanding, the Swedish mental health system has made major stride in providing quality, appropriate care.